收购格芯传闻背后：英特尔芯片制造野心显露

中国经营报2021-07-24

一桩也许是近年来全球半导体业内最大的并购计划日前浮出水面。7月17日，据《华尔街日报》援引知情人士透露，英特尔正在研究以300亿美元（约合人民币1940亿元）的价格收购格罗方德（业界常简称为“格芯”），后者曾是与台积电齐名的全球芯片制造巨头，如果该笔交易成行，将成为英特尔有史以来最大的一笔收购。不过，传闻很快遭到格罗方德否认。7月19日，格罗方德CEO出面表示，与英特尔洽谈收购的消息只是推测而已...

Source Link

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

Cyndilim93
2021-07-26
Cyndilim93
[呆住]
九寨飞流
2021-07-25
九寨飞流
期待格芯明年初能夠上市?
小白菜逆袭
2021-07-24
小白菜逆袭
666
- 小白菜逆袭:
  666
- 秀秀2:
  什么
yuliang559
2021-07-24
yuliang559
[微笑]
- yuliang559:
  [微笑]
LLMMYY
2021-07-24
LLMMYY
加油
zh2021
2021-07-24
zh2021
我想試試被英特爾收購的感覺
- zh2021:
  自己上市也行

Leave a comment

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"isChannel":false,"data":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2153133933?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03e38a3a3c63bd5a9d8d8ca2d384d1c5","is_english":false,"pubTime":"2021-07-24 10:39","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/9a95c1376e76363c1401fee7d3717173","id":"2153133933","market":"us","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"收购格芯传闻背后：英特尔芯片制造野心显露","media":"中国经营报","content":"<div>\n一桩也许是近年来全球半导体业内最大的并购计划日前浮出水面。7月17日，据《华尔街日报》援引知情人士透露，英特尔正在研究以300亿美元（约合人民币1940亿元）的价格收购格罗方德（业界常简称为“格芯”），后者曾是与台积电齐名的全球芯片制造巨头，如果该笔交易成行，将成为英特尔有史以来最大的一笔收购。\n不过，传闻很快遭到格罗方德否认。7月19日，格罗方德CEO出面表示，与英特尔洽谈收购的消息只是推测而已...\n\n<a href=\"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN2021072410404779d73bc6&s=b\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"tencent","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>收购格芯传闻背后：英特尔芯片制造野心显露</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n收购格芯传闻背后：英特尔芯片制造野心显露\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-24 10:39 北京时间&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN2021072410404779d73bc6&s=b>中国经营报</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n一桩也许是近年来全球半导体业内最大的并购计划日前浮出水面。7月17日，据《华尔街日报》援引知情人士透露，英特尔正在研究以300亿美元（约合人民币1940亿元）的价格收购格罗方德（业界常简称为“格芯”），后者曾是与台积电齐名的全球芯片制造巨头，如果该笔交易成行，将成为英特尔有史以来最大的一笔收购。\n不过，传闻很快遭到格罗方德否认。7月19日，格罗方德CEO出面表示，与英特尔洽谈收购的消息只是推测而已...\n\n<a href=\"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN2021072410404779d73bc6&s=b\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"INTC","symbol_name":"英特尔","start_time":0,"source_url":"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN2021072410404779d73bc6&s=b","article_id":"2153133933","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":["https://static.tigerbbs.com/03e38a3a3c63bd5a9d8d8ca2d384d1c5"],"rights":{"source":"tencent","url":"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN2021072410404779d73bc6&s=b","rn_cache_url":null,"customStyle":"body{padding-top:10px;}#news_title{font-weight:bold;#titleStyle#;}#news_description span{font-size:12px;#descriptionStyle#;}.footer-note{#statement#}","selectors":".mod-LoadTzbdNews, body","filters":".relate-stock, .hot-list, .recom-box, .wx-sou","directOrigin":true},"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2153133933","pubTimestamp":1627094380,"columns":[],"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"tencent","name":"腾讯"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"作为目前全球半导体产业中为数不多保留了芯片制造部门的龙头公司，英特尔近年来却在造芯环节开始落后于以芯片制造代工为核心业务的台积电，尤其是在先进制程方面，英特尔的7纳米工艺迟迟没有进展，台积电日前则在季度财报上宣布已通过5纳米工艺赚取了近三个季度10%的营收，同时还将在今年三季度试产3纳米工艺。","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"qq.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"zh","relate_stocks":{"159813":"芯片","INTC":"英特尔","03086":"华夏纳指","09086":"华夏纳指-U"},"translate_title":"Behind the rumors of acquiring Gexin: Intel's chip manufacturing ambitions are revealed","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dc40a9be1ca959805ac3f0737876e64a","symbols_score_info":{"159813":0.9,"INTC":0.9,"03086":0.9,"09086":0.9},"content_text":"一桩也许是近年来全球半导体业内最大的并购计划日前浮出水面。7月17日，据《华尔街日报》援引知情人士透露，英特尔正在研究以300亿美元（约合人民币1940亿元）的价格收购格罗方德（业界常简称为“格芯”），后者曾是与台积电齐名的全球芯片制造巨头，如果该笔交易成行，将成为英特尔有史以来最大的一笔收购。\n不过，传闻很快遭到格罗方德否认。7月19日，格罗方德CEO出面表示，与英特尔洽谈收购的消息只是推测而已，并否认与前者展开过收购方面的讨论，而是会继续寻求通过IPO方式实现上市。对此，《中国经营报》记者采访了英特尔中国区负责人，但对方表示对此话题不作回应。\n这一官方回应虽然迅速冷却了这笔有可能震动业界的惊天交易的舆论热度，但已有越来越多的证据显示，英特尔期冀在芯片制造领域有所作为。近日，英国《金融时报》引述英特尔官方说法证实，该公司正在计划投资200亿美元（约合人民币1296亿元）在多个欧盟成员国建造芯片工厂，目前该公司正在进行游说工作，以获得欧盟方面的支持。\n作为目前全球半导体产业中为数不多保留了芯片制造部门的龙头公司，英特尔近年来却在造芯环节开始落后于以芯片制造代工为核心业务的台积电，尤其是在先进制程方面，英特尔的7纳米工艺迟迟没有进展，台积电日前则在季度财报上宣布已通过5纳米工艺赚取了近三个季度10%的营收，同时还将在今年三季度试产3纳米工艺。\n如此差距之下，英特尔能否在收购格芯的进程中最终得手，似乎都已不影响外界对其将奋力重回芯片制造先进阵营的判断，而整个全球半导体制造领域的竞争格局，或也将以此次英特尔收购格芯传闻事件为标志，悄然进入新的态势。\n收购概率依然很高\n在英特尔近期连番动作背后，帕特·基辛格（Pat Gelsinger）被视为推动该轮决策的核心角色，他在今年2月正式接替了前任鲍勃·斯旺（Bob Swan）出任该公司的CEO。而据《华尔街日报》报道，鲍勃·斯旺出局的原因，正与其在推进先进制程方面不力导致落后主要竞争对手AMD有关。\n因此，履新不到一个月后，基辛格便高调对外宣布了英特尔的“IDM2.0”愿景。其中，IDM意指涵盖从设计到制造所有环节的半导体公司，由于芯片制造需要极高的资本投入技术研发，因此只有极少数巨头公司才有这一实力承担这一角色。在半导体制造领域，目前全球只有英特尔、三星等少数几家公司奉行IDM模式，其他则都采用台积电一类的专职代工模式。\n而在这张新绘制的IDM2.0蓝图中，代工业务也成为英特尔最重要的未来战略，基辛格在演讲中表示，英特尔计划成为美国和欧洲的主要代工产能供应商，为全球客户提供服务。为此，英特尔将投资200亿美元在亚利桑那州新建两家工厂、开设独立代工事务部门以及与第三方代工厂商进行合作。\n值得注意的是，在宣布合作名单时，基辛格直接点出了台积电、三星电子以及格罗方德的名字，而这三家企业正是占据目前全球芯片代工领域前三把交椅的主人。市场调研机构拓墣产业研究院数据显示，在全球晶圆代工领域，2019年第二季度台积电的市场份额为49.2%，紧随其后的为拥有18.0%份额的三星和8.7%的格罗方德。\n公开信息显示，格罗方德成立于2009年3月，其前身是英特尔在美国本土市场的老对手AMD的晶圆厂，因为连年亏损，最终被AMD脱手，经阿联酋阿布扎比创投基金 (ATIC) 注资后成立，专营芯片代工业务。\n但近年来，由于先进制程研发的进程并不顺利，格罗方德在与台积电、三星的竞争中逐渐败下阵来，市场份额一再下降，这也直接导致了其营收与利润规模的萎缩，使其更无足够的资金投入到芯片制程的军备竞赛上，从而形成恶性循环。\n在CHIP全球测试中心中国实验室主任罗国昭看来，英特尔虽然近年来遭遇困境，但稳定的财务表现仍是巨头级别；另一方面，虽然在尖端制程上同样乏力，但格罗方德在10纳米以上有稳定的产能供应与近8%的市场份额。\n此外，记者注意到，宏观政策上，今年3月底，美国官方公布了一轮规模达500亿美元的半导体产业本土振兴计划，用以投入芯片制造与研发，加速制造供应链重返美国。罗国昭表示，在这一政策下，没有比格罗方德这一美国背景的公司更适合英特尔，而英特尔如果完成收购并发力代工，无疑也能从500亿美元中获得更多的补贴。\n来自中国台湾的半导体资深分析师季维也向记者表示，美国透过英特尔这一收购案，能拥有更多向台积电施压的资本，以此逼迫台积电加大在美国的投资。\n以上种种现实因素，意欲在代工领域完成崛起的英特尔，以及需要资金补充的格罗方德，双方能够在交易中互取所需，这或许是收购绯闻传出的主要原因。\n“各取所需下，如果英特尔给出一个合理的价格，很难说中东的大股东就一定会拒绝。”罗国昭表示，格罗方德自身的意愿是一回事，但是否出售的决定权并不在其手中。因此，收购的可能性依然很高，而且在现阶段而言，这对双方都会是一个双赢的决定。\n赶超三星、台积电\n随着IDM2.0战略的践行，英特尔发力追赶的目标也已越来越清晰。如果能够成功吃下格罗方德的市场份额，英特尔前方将会只剩下三星与台积电两个对手。\n据记者了解，虽然目前英特尔的7纳米尚未推出，而三星、台积电均已宣布年内进军3纳米制程，但在实际中，一款芯片的性能取决于晶体管的数量，所以制程工艺越低越先进，因为单位面积内能容纳更多数量的晶体管。而公开信息显示，台积电5纳米芯片晶体管密度约为1.73亿颗/平方毫米，三星3纳米芯片晶体管密度约为1.7亿颗/平方毫米，英特尔规划中的7纳米芯片则达到了1.8亿颗/平方毫米。\n这也意味着，虽然落后两代制程，但英特尔在工艺方面与三星、台积电的差距比想象中要小得多，一旦7纳米技术成熟，英特尔也将有超越三星直追台积电的实力。\n尤其值得注意的是，最新的2021年二季度财报显示，虽然台积电营收增长再创新高，但获利略逊于预期，第三季预估的毛利率也不如预期。\n微妙的形势对比下，基辛格也在日前接受媒体采访时表示，英特尔将花两年时间赶上台积电。不过，罗国昭认为，短期内英特尔还不会是台积电的对手，毕竟台积电的3纳米工艺还是遥遥领先，而且制程方面的赶超不是朝夕之功，这也是英特尔选择与台积电合作的原因。\n据台积电CEO魏哲家此前透露，同5纳米工艺相比，3纳米工艺将使晶体管密度提升70%，并可能在明年下半年开始量产。外媒援引消息人士透露，苹果与英特尔将会是这一产线的主要客户。\n而在季维看来，在超过台积电之前，英特尔要解决的问题还有很多，即使其试图推进收购格罗方德，如果从收购阻力层面观察，格罗方德这几年的状况欠佳，在影响力上，被中芯国际与联电逐渐拉开差距，更无法撼动台积电。“格罗方德目前也还存在亏损，此时收购会在财务报表上造成一些压力，英特尔若真要收购格罗方德，可能要有充分的理由说服投资人同意。”季维表示。","kind":"news","is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":false,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":1,"need_auth":false,"code":"91000000","status":"200"},"commentList":[{"id":800034364,"gmtCreate":1627265345658,"gmtModify":1703486277555,"author":{"id":"3586928132531672","authorId":"3586928132531672","name":"Cyndilim93","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f3a31cb90d66b7a8374dcb75a6842f98","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4c5ceab71416b120bab4604c0754b52a","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3586928132531672","idStr":"3586928132531672"},"htmlText":"[呆住]&nbsp;","listText":"[呆住]&nbsp;","text":"[呆住]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/800034364","repostId":2153133933,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2153133933","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1627094380,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2153133933?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-24 10:39","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Behind the rumors of acquisition of GlobalFoundries: Intel's chip manufacturing ambitions revealed","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2153133933","media":"中国经营报","summary":"作为目前全球半导体产业中为数不多保留了芯片制造部门的龙头公司，英特尔近年来却在造芯环节开始落后于以芯片制造代工为核心业务的台积电，尤其是在先进制程方面，英特尔的7纳米工艺迟迟没有进展，台积电日前则在季度财报上宣布已通过5纳米工艺赚取了近三个季度10%的营收，同时还将在今年三季度试产3纳米工艺。","content":"A merger and acquisition plan that may be the largest in the global semiconductor industry in recent years has surfaced recently. On July 17, according to the Wall Street Journal citing people familiar with the matter,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/INTC\">Intel</a>It is studying the acquisition of GlobalFoundries (often referred to as \"GlobalFoundries\" in the industry) for US $30 billion (approximately RMB 194 billion), which was once a partner with<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSM\">TSMC</a>The equally famous global chip manufacturing giant, if this deal goes through, will become Intel's largest acquisition in history.However, the rumor was quickly denied by Grofond. On July 19, the CEO of GlobalFoundries stated that the news of negotiating an acquisition with Intel was just speculation, and denied that there had been any acquisition discussions with the former, but would continue to seek to achieve listing through IPO. In this regard, the reporter of China Business News interviewed the person in charge of Intel China, but the other party said that he would not respond to this topic.Although this official response quickly cooled the public opinion about this shocking deal that may shake the industry, there is more and more evidence that Intel hopes to make a difference in the field of chip manufacturing. Recently, the British \"Financial Times\" quoted Intel's official statement as confirming that the company is planning to invest US $20 billion (approximately RMB 129.6 billion) to build chip factories in multiple EU member states. The company is currently lobbying to obtain EU support.As one of the few leading companies in the global semiconductor industry that has retained its chip manufacturing department, Intel has begun to lag behind TSMC, whose core business is chip manufacturing foundry, in recent years, especially in terms of advanced manufacturing processes. Intel's 7 The nanometer process has not made progress. TSMC recently announced in its quarterly financial report that it has earned 10% of its revenue for nearly three quarters through the 5-nanometer process, and will also trial-produce the 3-nanometer process in the third quarter of this year.Under such a gap, whether Intel can finally succeed in the acquisition of GlobalFoundries does not seem to affect the outside world's judgment that it will strive to return to the advanced camp of chip manufacturing, and the competitive landscape of the entire global semiconductor manufacturing field may also be Marked by the rumored incident of Intel's acquisition of GlobalFoundries, it has quietly entered a new trend.The probability of acquisition remains highBehind Intel's recent actions, Pat Gelsinger (Pat Gelsinger) is regarded as the central role in promoting this round of decision-making. He officially succeeded his predecessor Bob Swan (Bob Swan) as the company's CEO in February this year. According to the Wall Street Journal, the reason Bob Swan was out is that he fell behind his main competitors because he failed to advance advanced manufacturing processes<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMD\">AMD</a>Related to.Therefore, less than a month after taking office, Kissinger made a high-profile announcement of Intel's \"IDM2.0\" vision. Among them, IDM refers to a semiconductor company covering all aspects from design to manufacturing. Since chip manufacturing requires extremely high capital investment in technology research and development, only a few giant companies have the strength to assume this role. In the field of semiconductor manufacturing, currently only Intel,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SMSN.UK\">Samsung</a>A few companies pursue the IDM model, while others adopt full-time foundry models such as TSMC.In this newly drawn IDM2.0 blueprint, the foundry business has also become Intel's most important future strategy. Kissinger said in his speech that Intel plans to become the main foundry capacity supplier in the United States and Europe, providing services to global customers. To this end, Intel will invest $20 billion to build two new factories in Arizona, open an independent foundry department and cooperate with third-party foundries.It is worth noting that when announcing the cooperation list, Kissinger directly pointed out TSMC,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SSNLF\">Samsung Electronics</a>And the name of GlobalFoundries, and these three companies are the owners that currently occupy the top three positions in the global chip foundry field. According to data from market research organization Top Industry Research Institute, in the global wafer foundry field, TSMC's market share in the second quarter of 2019 was 49.2%, followed by Samsung with 18.0% share and Grofond with 8.7%.According to public information, GlobalFoundries was established in March 2009. Its predecessor was the wafer fab of AMD, Intel's old rival in the US domestic market. Due to years of losses, it was finally sold by AMD. It was established after capital injection by Abu Dhabi Venture Capital Fund (ATIC), specializing in chip foundry business.However, in recent years, due to the unsmooth research and development of advanced manufacturing processes, GlobalFoundries has gradually lost in the competition with TSMC and Samsung, and its market share has declined again and again, which has directly led to the shrinkage of its revenue and profit scale, making it even more insufficient funds to invest in the arms race of the chip manufacturing process, thus forming an a vicious circle.According to Luo Guozhao, director of the China Laboratory of the CHIP Global Testing Center, although Intel has encountered difficulties in recent years, its stable financial performance is still at the level of a giant; On the other hand, although it is equally weak in cutting-edge manufacturing processes, GlobalFoundries has a stable production capacity supply above 10 nanometers and a market share of nearly 8%.In addition, the reporter noticed that in terms of macro policy, at the end of March this year, the U.S. official announced a round of US $50 billion local revitalization plan for the semiconductor industry to invest in chip manufacturing and research and development and accelerate the return of the manufacturing supply chain to the United States. Luo Guozhao said that under this policy, no company with an American background is more suitable for Intel than GlobalFoundries, and if Intel completes the acquisition and starts OEM, it will undoubtedly receive more subsidies from the US $50 billion.Ji Wei, a senior semiconductor analyst from Taiwan, also told reporters that through the acquisition of Intel, the United States can have more capital to put pressure on TSMC, thereby forcing TSMC to increase investment in the United States.All the above practical factors, Intel, which intends to complete its rise in the foundry field, and GlobalFoundries, which needs to be replenished by funds, can get each other's needs in the transaction, which may be the main reason for the acquisition scandal.\"If Intel offers a reasonable price, it's hard to say that the major shareholders in the Middle East will definitely refuse.\" Luo Guozhao said that GlobalFoundries' own will is one thing, but the decision on whether to sell is not in its hands. Therefore, the possibility of acquisition is still high, and at this stage, it will be a win-win decision for both parties.Catching up with Samsung and TSMCWith the implementation of IDM2.0 strategy, Intel's goal of catching up has become clearer and clearer. If it can successfully capture GlobalFoundries' market share, Intel will have only two rivals ahead, Samsung and TSMC.According to the reporter's understanding, although Intel's 7nm has not yet been launched, and Samsung and TSMC have announced that they will enter the 3nm process within the year, in practice, the performance of a chip depends on the number of transistors, so the lower the process technology, the more advanced it is. Because it can accommodate more transistors per unit area. Public information shows that the transistor density of TSMC's 5nm chip is about 173 million units/mm2, the transistor density of Samsung's 3nm chip is about 170 million units/mm2, and the transistor density of Intel's planned 7nm chip has reached 180 million units/mm2 millimeter.This also means that although it lags behind two generations of manufacturing processes, the gap between Intel and Samsung and TSMC in terms of technology is much smaller than expected. Once the 7nm technology matures, Intel will also have the strength to surpass Samsung and catch up with TSMC.It is particularly noteworthy that the latest financial report for the second quarter of 2021 shows that although TSMC's revenue growth has reached a new high, its profit is slightly worse than expected, and the estimated gross profit margin in the third quarter is not as expected.In contrast to the delicate situation, Kissinger also said in an interview with the media a few days ago that Intel will take two years to catch up with TSMC. However, Luo Guozhao believes that Intel will not be TSMC's opponent in the short term. After all, TSMC's 3nm process is still far ahead, and catching up in the manufacturing process is not an overnight achievement. This is why Intel chose to cooperate with TSMC.According to TSMC CEO Wei Zhejia, compared with the 5-nanometer process, the 3-nanometer process will increase transistor density by 70%, and mass production may begin in the second half of next year. Foreign media quoted sources as saying,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a>And Intel will be the main customers of this production line.In Ji Wei's view, Intel still has many problems to solve before surpassing TSMC. Even if it tries to advance the acquisition of GlobalFoundries, if we look at it from the perspective of acquisition resistance, GlobalFoundries has not been in good condition in recent years. In terms of influence, was<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SMI\">SMIC</a>With<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UMC\">UMC</a>Gradually widening the gap cannot shake TSMC. \"GlobalFoundries is still losing money at present. At this time, the acquisition will put some pressure on the financial statements. If Intel really wants to acquire GlobalFoundries, it may have sufficient reasons to convince investors to agree.\" Ji Wei said.","source":"tencent","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Behind the rumors of acquisition of GlobalFoundries: Intel's chip manufacturing ambitions revealed</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBehind the rumors of acquisition of GlobalFoundries: Intel's chip manufacturing ambitions revealed\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n中国经营报2021-07-24 10:39\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nA merger and acquisition plan that may be the largest in the global semiconductor industry in recent years has surfaced recently. On July 17, according to the Wall Street Journal citing people familiar with the matter,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/INTC\">Intel</a>It is studying the acquisition of GlobalFoundries (often referred to as \"GlobalFoundries\" in the industry) for US $30 billion (approximately RMB 194 billion), which was once a partner with<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSM\">TSMC</a>The equally famous global chip manufacturing giant, if this deal goes through, will become Intel's largest acquisition in history.However, the rumor was quickly denied by Grofond. On July 19, the CEO of GlobalFoundries stated that the news of negotiating an acquisition with Intel was just speculation, and denied that there had been any acquisition discussions with the former, but would continue to seek to achieve listing through IPO. In this regard, the reporter of China Business News interviewed the person in charge of Intel China, but the other party said that he would not respond to this topic.Although this official response quickly cooled the public opinion about this shocking deal that may shake the industry, there is more and more evidence that Intel hopes to make a difference in the field of chip manufacturing. Recently, the British \"Financial Times\" quoted Intel's official statement as confirming that the company is planning to invest US $20 billion (approximately RMB 129.6 billion) to build chip factories in multiple EU member states. The company is currently lobbying to obtain EU support.As one of the few leading companies in the global semiconductor industry that has retained its chip manufacturing department, Intel has begun to lag behind TSMC, whose core business is chip manufacturing foundry, in recent years, especially in terms of advanced manufacturing processes. Intel's 7 The nanometer process has not made progress. TSMC recently announced in its quarterly financial report that it has earned 10% of its revenue for nearly three quarters through the 5-nanometer process, and will also trial-produce the 3-nanometer process in the third quarter of this year.Under such a gap, whether Intel can finally succeed in the acquisition of GlobalFoundries does not seem to affect the outside world's judgment that it will strive to return to the advanced camp of chip manufacturing, and the competitive landscape of the entire global semiconductor manufacturing field may also be Marked by the rumored incident of Intel's acquisition of GlobalFoundries, it has quietly entered a new trend.The probability of acquisition remains highBehind Intel's recent actions, Pat Gelsinger (Pat Gelsinger) is regarded as the central role in promoting this round of decision-making. He officially succeeded his predecessor Bob Swan (Bob Swan) as the company's CEO in February this year. According to the Wall Street Journal, the reason Bob Swan was out is that he fell behind his main competitors because he failed to advance advanced manufacturing processes<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMD\">AMD</a>Related to.Therefore, less than a month after taking office, Kissinger made a high-profile announcement of Intel's \"IDM2.0\" vision. Among them, IDM refers to a semiconductor company covering all aspects from design to manufacturing. Since chip manufacturing requires extremely high capital investment in technology research and development, only a few giant companies have the strength to assume this role. In the field of semiconductor manufacturing, currently only Intel,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SMSN.UK\">Samsung</a>A few companies pursue the IDM model, while others adopt full-time foundry models such as TSMC.In this newly drawn IDM2.0 blueprint, the foundry business has also become Intel's most important future strategy. Kissinger said in his speech that Intel plans to become the main foundry capacity supplier in the United States and Europe, providing services to global customers. To this end, Intel will invest $20 billion to build two new factories in Arizona, open an independent foundry department and cooperate with third-party foundries.It is worth noting that when announcing the cooperation list, Kissinger directly pointed out TSMC,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SSNLF\">Samsung Electronics</a>And the name of GlobalFoundries, and these three companies are the owners that currently occupy the top three positions in the global chip foundry field. According to data from market research organization Top Industry Research Institute, in the global wafer foundry field, TSMC's market share in the second quarter of 2019 was 49.2%, followed by Samsung with 18.0% share and Grofond with 8.7%.According to public information, GlobalFoundries was established in March 2009. Its predecessor was the wafer fab of AMD, Intel's old rival in the US domestic market. Due to years of losses, it was finally sold by AMD. It was established after capital injection by Abu Dhabi Venture Capital Fund (ATIC), specializing in chip foundry business.However, in recent years, due to the unsmooth research and development of advanced manufacturing processes, GlobalFoundries has gradually lost in the competition with TSMC and Samsung, and its market share has declined again and again, which has directly led to the shrinkage of its revenue and profit scale, making it even more insufficient funds to invest in the arms race of the chip manufacturing process, thus forming an a vicious circle.According to Luo Guozhao, director of the China Laboratory of the CHIP Global Testing Center, although Intel has encountered difficulties in recent years, its stable financial performance is still at the level of a giant; On the other hand, although it is equally weak in cutting-edge manufacturing processes, GlobalFoundries has a stable production capacity supply above 10 nanometers and a market share of nearly 8%.In addition, the reporter noticed that in terms of macro policy, at the end of March this year, the U.S. official announced a round of US $50 billion local revitalization plan for the semiconductor industry to invest in chip manufacturing and research and development and accelerate the return of the manufacturing supply chain to the United States. Luo Guozhao said that under this policy, no company with an American background is more suitable for Intel than GlobalFoundries, and if Intel completes the acquisition and starts OEM, it will undoubtedly receive more subsidies from the US $50 billion.Ji Wei, a senior semiconductor analyst from Taiwan, also told reporters that through the acquisition of Intel, the United States can have more capital to put pressure on TSMC, thereby forcing TSMC to increase investment in the United States.All the above practical factors, Intel, which intends to complete its rise in the foundry field, and GlobalFoundries, which needs to be replenished by funds, can get each other's needs in the transaction, which may be the main reason for the acquisition scandal.\"If Intel offers a reasonable price, it's hard to say that the major shareholders in the Middle East will definitely refuse.\" Luo Guozhao said that GlobalFoundries' own will is one thing, but the decision on whether to sell is not in its hands. Therefore, the possibility of acquisition is still high, and at this stage, it will be a win-win decision for both parties.Catching up with Samsung and TSMCWith the implementation of IDM2.0 strategy, Intel's goal of catching up has become clearer and clearer. If it can successfully capture GlobalFoundries' market share, Intel will have only two rivals ahead, Samsung and TSMC.According to the reporter's understanding, although Intel's 7nm has not yet been launched, and Samsung and TSMC have announced that they will enter the 3nm process within the year, in practice, the performance of a chip depends on the number of transistors, so the lower the process technology, the more advanced it is. Because it can accommodate more transistors per unit area. Public information shows that the transistor density of TSMC's 5nm chip is about 173 million units/mm2, the transistor density of Samsung's 3nm chip is about 170 million units/mm2, and the transistor density of Intel's planned 7nm chip has reached 180 million units/mm2 millimeter.This also means that although it lags behind two generations of manufacturing processes, the gap between Intel and Samsung and TSMC in terms of technology is much smaller than expected. Once the 7nm technology matures, Intel will also have the strength to surpass Samsung and catch up with TSMC.It is particularly noteworthy that the latest financial report for the second quarter of 2021 shows that although TSMC's revenue growth has reached a new high, its profit is slightly worse than expected, and the estimated gross profit margin in the third quarter is not as expected.In contrast to the delicate situation, Kissinger also said in an interview with the media a few days ago that Intel will take two years to catch up with TSMC. However, Luo Guozhao believes that Intel will not be TSMC's opponent in the short term. After all, TSMC's 3nm process is still far ahead, and catching up in the manufacturing process is not an overnight achievement. This is why Intel chose to cooperate with TSMC.According to TSMC CEO Wei Zhejia, compared with the 5-nanometer process, the 3-nanometer process will increase transistor density by 70%, and mass production may begin in the second half of next year. Foreign media quoted sources as saying,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a>And Intel will be the main customers of this production line.In Ji Wei's view, Intel still has many problems to solve before surpassing TSMC. Even if it tries to advance the acquisition of GlobalFoundries, if we look at it from the perspective of acquisition resistance, GlobalFoundries has not been in good condition in recent years. In terms of influence, was<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SMI\">SMIC</a>With<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UMC\">UMC</a>Gradually widening the gap cannot shake TSMC. \"GlobalFoundries is still losing money at present. At this time, the acquisition will put some pressure on the financial statements. If Intel really wants to acquire GlobalFoundries, it may have sufficient reasons to convince investors to agree.\" Ji Wei said.\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n source：<a href=\"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN2021072410404779d73bc6&s=b\">中国经营报</a>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03e38a3a3c63bd5a9d8d8ca2d384d1c5","relate_stocks":{"159813":"芯片","INTC":"英特尔","03086":"华夏纳指","09086":"华夏纳指-U"},"source_url":"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN2021072410404779d73bc6&s=b","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/9a95c1376e76363c1401fee7d3717173","article_id":"2153133933","content_text":"一桩也许是近年来全球半导体业内最大的并购计划日前浮出水面。7月17日，据《华尔街日报》援引知情人士透露，英特尔正在研究以300亿美元（约合人民币1940亿元）的价格收购格罗方德（业界常简称为“格芯”），后者曾是与台积电齐名的全球芯片制造巨头，如果该笔交易成行，将成为英特尔有史以来最大的一笔收购。\n不过，传闻很快遭到格罗方德否认。7月19日，格罗方德CEO出面表示，与英特尔洽谈收购的消息只是推测而已，并否认与前者展开过收购方面的讨论，而是会继续寻求通过IPO方式实现上市。对此，《中国经营报》记者采访了英特尔中国区负责人，但对方表示对此话题不作回应。\n这一官方回应虽然迅速冷却了这笔有可能震动业界的惊天交易的舆论热度，但已有越来越多的证据显示，英特尔期冀在芯片制造领域有所作为。近日，英国《金融时报》引述英特尔官方说法证实，该公司正在计划投资200亿美元（约合人民币1296亿元）在多个欧盟成员国建造芯片工厂，目前该公司正在进行游说工作，以获得欧盟方面的支持。\n作为目前全球半导体产业中为数不多保留了芯片制造部门的龙头公司，英特尔近年来却在造芯环节开始落后于以芯片制造代工为核心业务的台积电，尤其是在先进制程方面，英特尔的7纳米工艺迟迟没有进展，台积电日前则在季度财报上宣布已通过5纳米工艺赚取了近三个季度10%的营收，同时还将在今年三季度试产3纳米工艺。\n如此差距之下，英特尔能否在收购格芯的进程中最终得手，似乎都已不影响外界对其将奋力重回芯片制造先进阵营的判断，而整个全球半导体制造领域的竞争格局，或也将以此次英特尔收购格芯传闻事件为标志，悄然进入新的态势。\n收购概率依然很高\n在英特尔近期连番动作背后，帕特·基辛格（Pat Gelsinger）被视为推动该轮决策的核心角色，他在今年2月正式接替了前任鲍勃·斯旺（Bob Swan）出任该公司的CEO。而据《华尔街日报》报道，鲍勃·斯旺出局的原因，正与其在推进先进制程方面不力导致落后主要竞争对手AMD有关。\n因此，履新不到一个月后，基辛格便高调对外宣布了英特尔的“IDM2.0”愿景。其中，IDM意指涵盖从设计到制造所有环节的半导体公司，由于芯片制造需要极高的资本投入技术研发，因此只有极少数巨头公司才有这一实力承担这一角色。在半导体制造领域，目前全球只有英特尔、三星等少数几家公司奉行IDM模式，其他则都采用台积电一类的专职代工模式。\n而在这张新绘制的IDM2.0蓝图中，代工业务也成为英特尔最重要的未来战略，基辛格在演讲中表示，英特尔计划成为美国和欧洲的主要代工产能供应商，为全球客户提供服务。为此，英特尔将投资200亿美元在亚利桑那州新建两家工厂、开设独立代工事务部门以及与第三方代工厂商进行合作。\n值得注意的是，在宣布合作名单时，基辛格直接点出了台积电、三星电子以及格罗方德的名字，而这三家企业正是占据目前全球芯片代工领域前三把交椅的主人。市场调研机构拓墣产业研究院数据显示，在全球晶圆代工领域，2019年第二季度台积电的市场份额为49.2%，紧随其后的为拥有18.0%份额的三星和8.7%的格罗方德。\n公开信息显示，格罗方德成立于2009年3月，其前身是英特尔在美国本土市场的老对手AMD的晶圆厂，因为连年亏损，最终被AMD脱手，经阿联酋阿布扎比创投基金 (ATIC) 注资后成立，专营芯片代工业务。\n但近年来，由于先进制程研发的进程并不顺利，格罗方德在与台积电、三星的竞争中逐渐败下阵来，市场份额一再下降，这也直接导致了其营收与利润规模的萎缩，使其更无足够的资金投入到芯片制程的军备竞赛上，从而形成恶性循环。\n在CHIP全球测试中心中国实验室主任罗国昭看来，英特尔虽然近年来遭遇困境，但稳定的财务表现仍是巨头级别；另一方面，虽然在尖端制程上同样乏力，但格罗方德在10纳米以上有稳定的产能供应与近8%的市场份额。\n此外，记者注意到，宏观政策上，今年3月底，美国官方公布了一轮规模达500亿美元的半导体产业本土振兴计划，用以投入芯片制造与研发，加速制造供应链重返美国。罗国昭表示，在这一政策下，没有比格罗方德这一美国背景的公司更适合英特尔，而英特尔如果完成收购并发力代工，无疑也能从500亿美元中获得更多的补贴。\n来自中国台湾的半导体资深分析师季维也向记者表示，美国透过英特尔这一收购案，能拥有更多向台积电施压的资本，以此逼迫台积电加大在美国的投资。\n以上种种现实因素，意欲在代工领域完成崛起的英特尔，以及需要资金补充的格罗方德，双方能够在交易中互取所需，这或许是收购绯闻传出的主要原因。\n“各取所需下，如果英特尔给出一个合理的价格，很难说中东的大股东就一定会拒绝。”罗国昭表示，格罗方德自身的意愿是一回事，但是否出售的决定权并不在其手中。因此，收购的可能性依然很高，而且在现阶段而言，这对双方都会是一个双赢的决定。\n赶超三星、台积电\n随着IDM2.0战略的践行，英特尔发力追赶的目标也已越来越清晰。如果能够成功吃下格罗方德的市场份额，英特尔前方将会只剩下三星与台积电两个对手。\n据记者了解，虽然目前英特尔的7纳米尚未推出，而三星、台积电均已宣布年内进军3纳米制程，但在实际中，一款芯片的性能取决于晶体管的数量，所以制程工艺越低越先进，因为单位面积内能容纳更多数量的晶体管。而公开信息显示，台积电5纳米芯片晶体管密度约为1.73亿颗/平方毫米，三星3纳米芯片晶体管密度约为1.7亿颗/平方毫米，英特尔规划中的7纳米芯片则达到了1.8亿颗/平方毫米。\n这也意味着，虽然落后两代制程，但英特尔在工艺方面与三星、台积电的差距比想象中要小得多，一旦7纳米技术成熟，英特尔也将有超越三星直追台积电的实力。\n尤其值得注意的是，最新的2021年二季度财报显示，虽然台积电营收增长再创新高，但获利略逊于预期，第三季预估的毛利率也不如预期。\n微妙的形势对比下，基辛格也在日前接受媒体采访时表示，英特尔将花两年时间赶上台积电。不过，罗国昭认为，短期内英特尔还不会是台积电的对手，毕竟台积电的3纳米工艺还是遥遥领先，而且制程方面的赶超不是朝夕之功，这也是英特尔选择与台积电合作的原因。\n据台积电CEO魏哲家此前透露，同5纳米工艺相比，3纳米工艺将使晶体管密度提升70%，并可能在明年下半年开始量产。外媒援引消息人士透露，苹果与英特尔将会是这一产线的主要客户。\n而在季维看来，在超过台积电之前，英特尔要解决的问题还有很多，即使其试图推进收购格罗方德，如果从收购阻力层面观察，格罗方德这几年的状况欠佳，在影响力上，被中芯国际与联电逐渐拉开差距，更无法撼动台积电。“格罗方德目前也还存在亏损，此时收购会在财务报表上造成一些压力，英特尔若真要收购格罗方德，可能要有充分的理由说服投资人同意。”季维表示。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"159813":0.9,"INTC":0.9,"03086":0.9,"09086":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":177911848,"gmtCreate":1627175244884,"gmtModify":1703485001441,"author":{"id":"3576982481279566","authorId":"3576982481279566","name":"九寨飞流","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d688e4bfe7ed0287344a57556145c3d9","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3576982481279566","idStr":"3576982481279566"},"htmlText":"期待格芯明年初能夠上市?","listText":"期待格芯明年初能夠上市?","text":"期待格芯明年初能夠上市?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/177911848","repostId":2153133933,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2153133933","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1627094380,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2153133933?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-24 10:39","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Behind the rumors of acquisition of GlobalFoundries: Intel's chip manufacturing ambitions revealed","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2153133933","media":"中国经营报","summary":"作为目前全球半导体产业中为数不多保留了芯片制造部门的龙头公司，英特尔近年来却在造芯环节开始落后于以芯片制造代工为核心业务的台积电，尤其是在先进制程方面，英特尔的7纳米工艺迟迟没有进展，台积电日前则在季度财报上宣布已通过5纳米工艺赚取了近三个季度10%的营收，同时还将在今年三季度试产3纳米工艺。","content":"A merger and acquisition plan that may be the largest in the global semiconductor industry in recent years has surfaced recently. On July 17, according to the Wall Street Journal citing people familiar with the matter,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/INTC\">Intel</a>It is studying the acquisition of GlobalFoundries (often referred to as \"GlobalFoundries\" in the industry) for US $30 billion (approximately RMB 194 billion), which was once a partner with<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSM\">TSMC</a>The equally famous global chip manufacturing giant, if this deal goes through, will become Intel's largest acquisition in history.However, the rumor was quickly denied by Grofond. On July 19, the CEO of GlobalFoundries stated that the news of negotiating an acquisition with Intel was just speculation, and denied that there had been any acquisition discussions with the former, but would continue to seek to achieve listing through IPO. In this regard, the reporter of China Business News interviewed the person in charge of Intel China, but the other party said that he would not respond to this topic.Although this official response quickly cooled the public opinion about this shocking deal that may shake the industry, there is more and more evidence that Intel hopes to make a difference in the field of chip manufacturing. Recently, the British \"Financial Times\" quoted Intel's official statement as confirming that the company is planning to invest US $20 billion (approximately RMB 129.6 billion) to build chip factories in multiple EU member states. The company is currently lobbying to obtain EU support.As one of the few leading companies in the global semiconductor industry that has retained its chip manufacturing department, Intel has begun to lag behind TSMC, whose core business is chip manufacturing foundry, in recent years, especially in terms of advanced manufacturing processes. Intel's 7 The nanometer process has not made progress. TSMC recently announced in its quarterly financial report that it has earned 10% of its revenue for nearly three quarters through the 5-nanometer process, and will also trial-produce the 3-nanometer process in the third quarter of this year.Under such a gap, whether Intel can finally succeed in the acquisition of GlobalFoundries does not seem to affect the outside world's judgment that it will strive to return to the advanced camp of chip manufacturing, and the competitive landscape of the entire global semiconductor manufacturing field may also be Marked by the rumored incident of Intel's acquisition of GlobalFoundries, it has quietly entered a new trend.The probability of acquisition remains highBehind Intel's recent actions, Pat Gelsinger (Pat Gelsinger) is regarded as the central role in promoting this round of decision-making. He officially succeeded his predecessor Bob Swan (Bob Swan) as the company's CEO in February this year. According to the Wall Street Journal, the reason Bob Swan was out is that he fell behind his main competitors because he failed to advance advanced manufacturing processes<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMD\">AMD</a>Related to.Therefore, less than a month after taking office, Kissinger made a high-profile announcement of Intel's \"IDM2.0\" vision. Among them, IDM refers to a semiconductor company covering all aspects from design to manufacturing. Since chip manufacturing requires extremely high capital investment in technology research and development, only a few giant companies have the strength to assume this role. In the field of semiconductor manufacturing, currently only Intel,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SMSN.UK\">Samsung</a>A few companies pursue the IDM model, while others adopt full-time foundry models such as TSMC.In this newly drawn IDM2.0 blueprint, the foundry business has also become Intel's most important future strategy. Kissinger said in his speech that Intel plans to become the main foundry capacity supplier in the United States and Europe, providing services to global customers. To this end, Intel will invest $20 billion to build two new factories in Arizona, open an independent foundry department and cooperate with third-party foundries.It is worth noting that when announcing the cooperation list, Kissinger directly pointed out TSMC,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SSNLF\">Samsung Electronics</a>And the name of GlobalFoundries, and these three companies are the owners that currently occupy the top three positions in the global chip foundry field. According to data from market research organization Top Industry Research Institute, in the global wafer foundry field, TSMC's market share in the second quarter of 2019 was 49.2%, followed by Samsung with 18.0% share and Grofond with 8.7%.According to public information, GlobalFoundries was established in March 2009. Its predecessor was the wafer fab of AMD, Intel's old rival in the US domestic market. Due to years of losses, it was finally sold by AMD. It was established after capital injection by Abu Dhabi Venture Capital Fund (ATIC), specializing in chip foundry business.However, in recent years, due to the unsmooth research and development of advanced manufacturing processes, GlobalFoundries has gradually lost in the competition with TSMC and Samsung, and its market share has declined again and again, which has directly led to the shrinkage of its revenue and profit scale, making it even more insufficient funds to invest in the arms race of the chip manufacturing process, thus forming an a vicious circle.According to Luo Guozhao, director of the China Laboratory of the CHIP Global Testing Center, although Intel has encountered difficulties in recent years, its stable financial performance is still at the level of a giant; On the other hand, although it is equally weak in cutting-edge manufacturing processes, GlobalFoundries has a stable production capacity supply above 10 nanometers and a market share of nearly 8%.In addition, the reporter noticed that in terms of macro policy, at the end of March this year, the U.S. official announced a round of US $50 billion local revitalization plan for the semiconductor industry to invest in chip manufacturing and research and development and accelerate the return of the manufacturing supply chain to the United States. Luo Guozhao said that under this policy, no company with an American background is more suitable for Intel than GlobalFoundries, and if Intel completes the acquisition and starts OEM, it will undoubtedly receive more subsidies from the US $50 billion.Ji Wei, a senior semiconductor analyst from Taiwan, also told reporters that through the acquisition of Intel, the United States can have more capital to put pressure on TSMC, thereby forcing TSMC to increase investment in the United States.All the above practical factors, Intel, which intends to complete its rise in the foundry field, and GlobalFoundries, which needs to be replenished by funds, can get each other's needs in the transaction, which may be the main reason for the acquisition scandal.\"If Intel offers a reasonable price, it's hard to say that the major shareholders in the Middle East will definitely refuse.\" Luo Guozhao said that GlobalFoundries' own will is one thing, but the decision on whether to sell is not in its hands. Therefore, the possibility of acquisition is still high, and at this stage, it will be a win-win decision for both parties.Catching up with Samsung and TSMCWith the implementation of IDM2.0 strategy, Intel's goal of catching up has become clearer and clearer. If it can successfully capture GlobalFoundries' market share, Intel will have only two rivals ahead, Samsung and TSMC.According to the reporter's understanding, although Intel's 7nm has not yet been launched, and Samsung and TSMC have announced that they will enter the 3nm process within the year, in practice, the performance of a chip depends on the number of transistors, so the lower the process technology, the more advanced it is. Because it can accommodate more transistors per unit area. Public information shows that the transistor density of TSMC's 5nm chip is about 173 million units/mm2, the transistor density of Samsung's 3nm chip is about 170 million units/mm2, and the transistor density of Intel's planned 7nm chip has reached 180 million units/mm2 millimeter.This also means that although it lags behind two generations of manufacturing processes, the gap between Intel and Samsung and TSMC in terms of technology is much smaller than expected. Once the 7nm technology matures, Intel will also have the strength to surpass Samsung and catch up with TSMC.It is particularly noteworthy that the latest financial report for the second quarter of 2021 shows that although TSMC's revenue growth has reached a new high, its profit is slightly worse than expected, and the estimated gross profit margin in the third quarter is not as expected.In contrast to the delicate situation, Kissinger also said in an interview with the media a few days ago that Intel will take two years to catch up with TSMC. However, Luo Guozhao believes that Intel will not be TSMC's opponent in the short term. After all, TSMC's 3nm process is still far ahead, and catching up in the manufacturing process is not an overnight achievement. This is why Intel chose to cooperate with TSMC.According to TSMC CEO Wei Zhejia, compared with the 5-nanometer process, the 3-nanometer process will increase transistor density by 70%, and mass production may begin in the second half of next year. Foreign media quoted sources as saying,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a>And Intel will be the main customers of this production line.In Ji Wei's view, Intel still has many problems to solve before surpassing TSMC. Even if it tries to advance the acquisition of GlobalFoundries, if we look at it from the perspective of acquisition resistance, GlobalFoundries has not been in good condition in recent years. In terms of influence, was<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SMI\">SMIC</a>With<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UMC\">UMC</a>Gradually widening the gap cannot shake TSMC. \"GlobalFoundries is still losing money at present. At this time, the acquisition will put some pressure on the financial statements. If Intel really wants to acquire GlobalFoundries, it may have sufficient reasons to convince investors to agree.\" Ji Wei said.","source":"tencent","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Behind the rumors of acquisition of GlobalFoundries: Intel's chip manufacturing ambitions revealed</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBehind the rumors of acquisition of GlobalFoundries: Intel's chip manufacturing ambitions revealed\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n中国经营报2021-07-24 10:39\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nA merger and acquisition plan that may be the largest in the global semiconductor industry in recent years has surfaced recently. On July 17, according to the Wall Street Journal citing people familiar with the matter,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/INTC\">Intel</a>It is studying the acquisition of GlobalFoundries (often referred to as \"GlobalFoundries\" in the industry) for US $30 billion (approximately RMB 194 billion), which was once a partner with<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSM\">TSMC</a>The equally famous global chip manufacturing giant, if this deal goes through, will become Intel's largest acquisition in history.However, the rumor was quickly denied by Grofond. On July 19, the CEO of GlobalFoundries stated that the news of negotiating an acquisition with Intel was just speculation, and denied that there had been any acquisition discussions with the former, but would continue to seek to achieve listing through IPO. In this regard, the reporter of China Business News interviewed the person in charge of Intel China, but the other party said that he would not respond to this topic.Although this official response quickly cooled the public opinion about this shocking deal that may shake the industry, there is more and more evidence that Intel hopes to make a difference in the field of chip manufacturing. Recently, the British \"Financial Times\" quoted Intel's official statement as confirming that the company is planning to invest US $20 billion (approximately RMB 129.6 billion) to build chip factories in multiple EU member states. The company is currently lobbying to obtain EU support.As one of the few leading companies in the global semiconductor industry that has retained its chip manufacturing department, Intel has begun to lag behind TSMC, whose core business is chip manufacturing foundry, in recent years, especially in terms of advanced manufacturing processes. Intel's 7 The nanometer process has not made progress. TSMC recently announced in its quarterly financial report that it has earned 10% of its revenue for nearly three quarters through the 5-nanometer process, and will also trial-produce the 3-nanometer process in the third quarter of this year.Under such a gap, whether Intel can finally succeed in the acquisition of GlobalFoundries does not seem to affect the outside world's judgment that it will strive to return to the advanced camp of chip manufacturing, and the competitive landscape of the entire global semiconductor manufacturing field may also be Marked by the rumored incident of Intel's acquisition of GlobalFoundries, it has quietly entered a new trend.The probability of acquisition remains highBehind Intel's recent actions, Pat Gelsinger (Pat Gelsinger) is regarded as the central role in promoting this round of decision-making. He officially succeeded his predecessor Bob Swan (Bob Swan) as the company's CEO in February this year. According to the Wall Street Journal, the reason Bob Swan was out is that he fell behind his main competitors because he failed to advance advanced manufacturing processes<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMD\">AMD</a>Related to.Therefore, less than a month after taking office, Kissinger made a high-profile announcement of Intel's \"IDM2.0\" vision. Among them, IDM refers to a semiconductor company covering all aspects from design to manufacturing. Since chip manufacturing requires extremely high capital investment in technology research and development, only a few giant companies have the strength to assume this role. In the field of semiconductor manufacturing, currently only Intel,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SMSN.UK\">Samsung</a>A few companies pursue the IDM model, while others adopt full-time foundry models such as TSMC.In this newly drawn IDM2.0 blueprint, the foundry business has also become Intel's most important future strategy. Kissinger said in his speech that Intel plans to become the main foundry capacity supplier in the United States and Europe, providing services to global customers. To this end, Intel will invest $20 billion to build two new factories in Arizona, open an independent foundry department and cooperate with third-party foundries.It is worth noting that when announcing the cooperation list, Kissinger directly pointed out TSMC,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SSNLF\">Samsung Electronics</a>And the name of GlobalFoundries, and these three companies are the owners that currently occupy the top three positions in the global chip foundry field. According to data from market research organization Top Industry Research Institute, in the global wafer foundry field, TSMC's market share in the second quarter of 2019 was 49.2%, followed by Samsung with 18.0% share and Grofond with 8.7%.According to public information, GlobalFoundries was established in March 2009. Its predecessor was the wafer fab of AMD, Intel's old rival in the US domestic market. Due to years of losses, it was finally sold by AMD. It was established after capital injection by Abu Dhabi Venture Capital Fund (ATIC), specializing in chip foundry business.However, in recent years, due to the unsmooth research and development of advanced manufacturing processes, GlobalFoundries has gradually lost in the competition with TSMC and Samsung, and its market share has declined again and again, which has directly led to the shrinkage of its revenue and profit scale, making it even more insufficient funds to invest in the arms race of the chip manufacturing process, thus forming an a vicious circle.According to Luo Guozhao, director of the China Laboratory of the CHIP Global Testing Center, although Intel has encountered difficulties in recent years, its stable financial performance is still at the level of a giant; On the other hand, although it is equally weak in cutting-edge manufacturing processes, GlobalFoundries has a stable production capacity supply above 10 nanometers and a market share of nearly 8%.In addition, the reporter noticed that in terms of macro policy, at the end of March this year, the U.S. official announced a round of US $50 billion local revitalization plan for the semiconductor industry to invest in chip manufacturing and research and development and accelerate the return of the manufacturing supply chain to the United States. Luo Guozhao said that under this policy, no company with an American background is more suitable for Intel than GlobalFoundries, and if Intel completes the acquisition and starts OEM, it will undoubtedly receive more subsidies from the US $50 billion.Ji Wei, a senior semiconductor analyst from Taiwan, also told reporters that through the acquisition of Intel, the United States can have more capital to put pressure on TSMC, thereby forcing TSMC to increase investment in the United States.All the above practical factors, Intel, which intends to complete its rise in the foundry field, and GlobalFoundries, which needs to be replenished by funds, can get each other's needs in the transaction, which may be the main reason for the acquisition scandal.\"If Intel offers a reasonable price, it's hard to say that the major shareholders in the Middle East will definitely refuse.\" Luo Guozhao said that GlobalFoundries' own will is one thing, but the decision on whether to sell is not in its hands. Therefore, the possibility of acquisition is still high, and at this stage, it will be a win-win decision for both parties.Catching up with Samsung and TSMCWith the implementation of IDM2.0 strategy, Intel's goal of catching up has become clearer and clearer. If it can successfully capture GlobalFoundries' market share, Intel will have only two rivals ahead, Samsung and TSMC.According to the reporter's understanding, although Intel's 7nm has not yet been launched, and Samsung and TSMC have announced that they will enter the 3nm process within the year, in practice, the performance of a chip depends on the number of transistors, so the lower the process technology, the more advanced it is. Because it can accommodate more transistors per unit area. Public information shows that the transistor density of TSMC's 5nm chip is about 173 million units/mm2, the transistor density of Samsung's 3nm chip is about 170 million units/mm2, and the transistor density of Intel's planned 7nm chip has reached 180 million units/mm2 millimeter.This also means that although it lags behind two generations of manufacturing processes, the gap between Intel and Samsung and TSMC in terms of technology is much smaller than expected. Once the 7nm technology matures, Intel will also have the strength to surpass Samsung and catch up with TSMC.It is particularly noteworthy that the latest financial report for the second quarter of 2021 shows that although TSMC's revenue growth has reached a new high, its profit is slightly worse than expected, and the estimated gross profit margin in the third quarter is not as expected.In contrast to the delicate situation, Kissinger also said in an interview with the media a few days ago that Intel will take two years to catch up with TSMC. However, Luo Guozhao believes that Intel will not be TSMC's opponent in the short term. After all, TSMC's 3nm process is still far ahead, and catching up in the manufacturing process is not an overnight achievement. This is why Intel chose to cooperate with TSMC.According to TSMC CEO Wei Zhejia, compared with the 5-nanometer process, the 3-nanometer process will increase transistor density by 70%, and mass production may begin in the second half of next year. Foreign media quoted sources as saying,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a>And Intel will be the main customers of this production line.In Ji Wei's view, Intel still has many problems to solve before surpassing TSMC. Even if it tries to advance the acquisition of GlobalFoundries, if we look at it from the perspective of acquisition resistance, GlobalFoundries has not been in good condition in recent years. In terms of influence, was<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SMI\">SMIC</a>With<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UMC\">UMC</a>Gradually widening the gap cannot shake TSMC. \"GlobalFoundries is still losing money at present. At this time, the acquisition will put some pressure on the financial statements. If Intel really wants to acquire GlobalFoundries, it may have sufficient reasons to convince investors to agree.\" Ji Wei said.\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n source：<a href=\"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN2021072410404779d73bc6&s=b\">中国经营报</a>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03e38a3a3c63bd5a9d8d8ca2d384d1c5","relate_stocks":{"159813":"芯片","INTC":"英特尔","03086":"华夏纳指","09086":"华夏纳指-U"},"source_url":"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN2021072410404779d73bc6&s=b","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/9a95c1376e76363c1401fee7d3717173","article_id":"2153133933","content_text":"一桩也许是近年来全球半导体业内最大的并购计划日前浮出水面。7月17日，据《华尔街日报》援引知情人士透露，英特尔正在研究以300亿美元（约合人民币1940亿元）的价格收购格罗方德（业界常简称为“格芯”），后者曾是与台积电齐名的全球芯片制造巨头，如果该笔交易成行，将成为英特尔有史以来最大的一笔收购。\n不过，传闻很快遭到格罗方德否认。7月19日，格罗方德CEO出面表示，与英特尔洽谈收购的消息只是推测而已，并否认与前者展开过收购方面的讨论，而是会继续寻求通过IPO方式实现上市。对此，《中国经营报》记者采访了英特尔中国区负责人，但对方表示对此话题不作回应。\n这一官方回应虽然迅速冷却了这笔有可能震动业界的惊天交易的舆论热度，但已有越来越多的证据显示，英特尔期冀在芯片制造领域有所作为。近日，英国《金融时报》引述英特尔官方说法证实，该公司正在计划投资200亿美元（约合人民币1296亿元）在多个欧盟成员国建造芯片工厂，目前该公司正在进行游说工作，以获得欧盟方面的支持。\n作为目前全球半导体产业中为数不多保留了芯片制造部门的龙头公司，英特尔近年来却在造芯环节开始落后于以芯片制造代工为核心业务的台积电，尤其是在先进制程方面，英特尔的7纳米工艺迟迟没有进展，台积电日前则在季度财报上宣布已通过5纳米工艺赚取了近三个季度10%的营收，同时还将在今年三季度试产3纳米工艺。\n如此差距之下，英特尔能否在收购格芯的进程中最终得手，似乎都已不影响外界对其将奋力重回芯片制造先进阵营的判断，而整个全球半导体制造领域的竞争格局，或也将以此次英特尔收购格芯传闻事件为标志，悄然进入新的态势。\n收购概率依然很高\n在英特尔近期连番动作背后，帕特·基辛格（Pat Gelsinger）被视为推动该轮决策的核心角色，他在今年2月正式接替了前任鲍勃·斯旺（Bob Swan）出任该公司的CEO。而据《华尔街日报》报道，鲍勃·斯旺出局的原因，正与其在推进先进制程方面不力导致落后主要竞争对手AMD有关。\n因此，履新不到一个月后，基辛格便高调对外宣布了英特尔的“IDM2.0”愿景。其中，IDM意指涵盖从设计到制造所有环节的半导体公司，由于芯片制造需要极高的资本投入技术研发，因此只有极少数巨头公司才有这一实力承担这一角色。在半导体制造领域，目前全球只有英特尔、三星等少数几家公司奉行IDM模式，其他则都采用台积电一类的专职代工模式。\n而在这张新绘制的IDM2.0蓝图中，代工业务也成为英特尔最重要的未来战略，基辛格在演讲中表示，英特尔计划成为美国和欧洲的主要代工产能供应商，为全球客户提供服务。为此，英特尔将投资200亿美元在亚利桑那州新建两家工厂、开设独立代工事务部门以及与第三方代工厂商进行合作。\n值得注意的是，在宣布合作名单时，基辛格直接点出了台积电、三星电子以及格罗方德的名字，而这三家企业正是占据目前全球芯片代工领域前三把交椅的主人。市场调研机构拓墣产业研究院数据显示，在全球晶圆代工领域，2019年第二季度台积电的市场份额为49.2%，紧随其后的为拥有18.0%份额的三星和8.7%的格罗方德。\n公开信息显示，格罗方德成立于2009年3月，其前身是英特尔在美国本土市场的老对手AMD的晶圆厂，因为连年亏损，最终被AMD脱手，经阿联酋阿布扎比创投基金 (ATIC) 注资后成立，专营芯片代工业务。\n但近年来，由于先进制程研发的进程并不顺利，格罗方德在与台积电、三星的竞争中逐渐败下阵来，市场份额一再下降，这也直接导致了其营收与利润规模的萎缩，使其更无足够的资金投入到芯片制程的军备竞赛上，从而形成恶性循环。\n在CHIP全球测试中心中国实验室主任罗国昭看来，英特尔虽然近年来遭遇困境，但稳定的财务表现仍是巨头级别；另一方面，虽然在尖端制程上同样乏力，但格罗方德在10纳米以上有稳定的产能供应与近8%的市场份额。\n此外，记者注意到，宏观政策上，今年3月底，美国官方公布了一轮规模达500亿美元的半导体产业本土振兴计划，用以投入芯片制造与研发，加速制造供应链重返美国。罗国昭表示，在这一政策下，没有比格罗方德这一美国背景的公司更适合英特尔，而英特尔如果完成收购并发力代工，无疑也能从500亿美元中获得更多的补贴。\n来自中国台湾的半导体资深分析师季维也向记者表示，美国透过英特尔这一收购案，能拥有更多向台积电施压的资本，以此逼迫台积电加大在美国的投资。\n以上种种现实因素，意欲在代工领域完成崛起的英特尔，以及需要资金补充的格罗方德，双方能够在交易中互取所需，这或许是收购绯闻传出的主要原因。\n“各取所需下，如果英特尔给出一个合理的价格，很难说中东的大股东就一定会拒绝。”罗国昭表示，格罗方德自身的意愿是一回事，但是否出售的决定权并不在其手中。因此，收购的可能性依然很高，而且在现阶段而言，这对双方都会是一个双赢的决定。\n赶超三星、台积电\n随着IDM2.0战略的践行，英特尔发力追赶的目标也已越来越清晰。如果能够成功吃下格罗方德的市场份额，英特尔前方将会只剩下三星与台积电两个对手。\n据记者了解，虽然目前英特尔的7纳米尚未推出，而三星、台积电均已宣布年内进军3纳米制程，但在实际中，一款芯片的性能取决于晶体管的数量，所以制程工艺越低越先进，因为单位面积内能容纳更多数量的晶体管。而公开信息显示，台积电5纳米芯片晶体管密度约为1.73亿颗/平方毫米，三星3纳米芯片晶体管密度约为1.7亿颗/平方毫米，英特尔规划中的7纳米芯片则达到了1.8亿颗/平方毫米。\n这也意味着，虽然落后两代制程，但英特尔在工艺方面与三星、台积电的差距比想象中要小得多，一旦7纳米技术成熟，英特尔也将有超越三星直追台积电的实力。\n尤其值得注意的是，最新的2021年二季度财报显示，虽然台积电营收增长再创新高，但获利略逊于预期，第三季预估的毛利率也不如预期。\n微妙的形势对比下，基辛格也在日前接受媒体采访时表示，英特尔将花两年时间赶上台积电。不过，罗国昭认为，短期内英特尔还不会是台积电的对手，毕竟台积电的3纳米工艺还是遥遥领先，而且制程方面的赶超不是朝夕之功，这也是英特尔选择与台积电合作的原因。\n据台积电CEO魏哲家此前透露，同5纳米工艺相比，3纳米工艺将使晶体管密度提升70%，并可能在明年下半年开始量产。外媒援引消息人士透露，苹果与英特尔将会是这一产线的主要客户。\n而在季维看来，在超过台积电之前，英特尔要解决的问题还有很多，即使其试图推进收购格罗方德，如果从收购阻力层面观察，格罗方德这几年的状况欠佳，在影响力上，被中芯国际与联电逐渐拉开差距，更无法撼动台积电。“格罗方德目前也还存在亏损，此时收购会在财务报表上造成一些压力，英特尔若真要收购格罗方德，可能要有充分的理由说服投资人同意。”季维表示。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"159813":0.9,"INTC":0.9,"03086":0.9,"09086":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":174715859,"gmtCreate":1627138856471,"gmtModify":1703484724515,"author":{"id":"3579091027208131","authorId":"3579091027208131","name":"小白菜逆袭","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e6fae3ff5fe246fa905d2a09cc814fdf","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0a8758340a08196056f8bc1e54805193","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"authorIdStr":"3579091027208131","idStr":"3579091027208131"},"htmlText":"666","listText":"666","text":"666","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/174715859","repostId":2153133933,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2153133933","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1627094380,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2153133933?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-24 10:39","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Behind the rumors of acquisition of GlobalFoundries: Intel's chip manufacturing ambitions revealed","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2153133933","media":"中国经营报","summary":"作为目前全球半导体产业中为数不多保留了芯片制造部门的龙头公司，英特尔近年来却在造芯环节开始落后于以芯片制造代工为核心业务的台积电，尤其是在先进制程方面，英特尔的7纳米工艺迟迟没有进展，台积电日前则在季度财报上宣布已通过5纳米工艺赚取了近三个季度10%的营收，同时还将在今年三季度试产3纳米工艺。","content":"A merger and acquisition plan that may be the largest in the global semiconductor industry in recent years has surfaced recently. On July 17, according to the Wall Street Journal citing people familiar with the matter,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/INTC\">Intel</a>It is studying the acquisition of GlobalFoundries (often referred to as \"GlobalFoundries\" in the industry) for US $30 billion (approximately RMB 194 billion), which was once a partner with<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSM\">TSMC</a>The equally famous global chip manufacturing giant, if this deal goes through, will become Intel's largest acquisition in history.However, the rumor was quickly denied by Grofond. On July 19, the CEO of GlobalFoundries stated that the news of negotiating an acquisition with Intel was just speculation, and denied that there had been any acquisition discussions with the former, but would continue to seek to achieve listing through IPO. In this regard, the reporter of China Business News interviewed the person in charge of Intel China, but the other party said that he would not respond to this topic.Although this official response quickly cooled the public opinion about this shocking deal that may shake the industry, there is more and more evidence that Intel hopes to make a difference in the field of chip manufacturing. Recently, the British \"Financial Times\" quoted Intel's official statement as confirming that the company is planning to invest US $20 billion (approximately RMB 129.6 billion) to build chip factories in multiple EU member states. The company is currently lobbying to obtain EU support.As one of the few leading companies in the global semiconductor industry that has retained its chip manufacturing department, Intel has begun to lag behind TSMC, whose core business is chip manufacturing foundry, in recent years, especially in terms of advanced manufacturing processes. Intel's 7 The nanometer process has not made progress. TSMC recently announced in its quarterly financial report that it has earned 10% of its revenue for nearly three quarters through the 5-nanometer process, and will also trial-produce the 3-nanometer process in the third quarter of this year.Under such a gap, whether Intel can finally succeed in the acquisition of GlobalFoundries does not seem to affect the outside world's judgment that it will strive to return to the advanced camp of chip manufacturing, and the competitive landscape of the entire global semiconductor manufacturing field may also be Marked by the rumored incident of Intel's acquisition of GlobalFoundries, it has quietly entered a new trend.The probability of acquisition remains highBehind Intel's recent actions, Pat Gelsinger (Pat Gelsinger) is regarded as the central role in promoting this round of decision-making. He officially succeeded his predecessor Bob Swan (Bob Swan) as the company's CEO in February this year. According to the Wall Street Journal, the reason Bob Swan was out is that he fell behind his main competitors because he failed to advance advanced manufacturing processes<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMD\">AMD</a>Related to.Therefore, less than a month after taking office, Kissinger made a high-profile announcement of Intel's \"IDM2.0\" vision. Among them, IDM refers to a semiconductor company covering all aspects from design to manufacturing. Since chip manufacturing requires extremely high capital investment in technology research and development, only a few giant companies have the strength to assume this role. In the field of semiconductor manufacturing, currently only Intel,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SMSN.UK\">Samsung</a>A few companies pursue the IDM model, while others adopt full-time foundry models such as TSMC.In this newly drawn IDM2.0 blueprint, the foundry business has also become Intel's most important future strategy. Kissinger said in his speech that Intel plans to become the main foundry capacity supplier in the United States and Europe, providing services to global customers. To this end, Intel will invest $20 billion to build two new factories in Arizona, open an independent foundry department and cooperate with third-party foundries.It is worth noting that when announcing the cooperation list, Kissinger directly pointed out TSMC,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SSNLF\">Samsung Electronics</a>And the name of GlobalFoundries, and these three companies are the owners that currently occupy the top three positions in the global chip foundry field. According to data from market research organization Top Industry Research Institute, in the global wafer foundry field, TSMC's market share in the second quarter of 2019 was 49.2%, followed by Samsung with 18.0% share and Grofond with 8.7%.According to public information, GlobalFoundries was established in March 2009. Its predecessor was the wafer fab of AMD, Intel's old rival in the US domestic market. Due to years of losses, it was finally sold by AMD. It was established after capital injection by Abu Dhabi Venture Capital Fund (ATIC), specializing in chip foundry business.However, in recent years, due to the unsmooth research and development of advanced manufacturing processes, GlobalFoundries has gradually lost in the competition with TSMC and Samsung, and its market share has declined again and again, which has directly led to the shrinkage of its revenue and profit scale, making it even more insufficient funds to invest in the arms race of the chip manufacturing process, thus forming an a vicious circle.According to Luo Guozhao, director of the China Laboratory of the CHIP Global Testing Center, although Intel has encountered difficulties in recent years, its stable financial performance is still at the level of a giant; On the other hand, although it is equally weak in cutting-edge manufacturing processes, GlobalFoundries has a stable production capacity supply above 10 nanometers and a market share of nearly 8%.In addition, the reporter noticed that in terms of macro policy, at the end of March this year, the U.S. official announced a round of US $50 billion local revitalization plan for the semiconductor industry to invest in chip manufacturing and research and development and accelerate the return of the manufacturing supply chain to the United States. Luo Guozhao said that under this policy, no company with an American background is more suitable for Intel than GlobalFoundries, and if Intel completes the acquisition and starts OEM, it will undoubtedly receive more subsidies from the US $50 billion.Ji Wei, a senior semiconductor analyst from Taiwan, also told reporters that through the acquisition of Intel, the United States can have more capital to put pressure on TSMC, thereby forcing TSMC to increase investment in the United States.All the above practical factors, Intel, which intends to complete its rise in the foundry field, and GlobalFoundries, which needs to be replenished by funds, can get each other's needs in the transaction, which may be the main reason for the acquisition scandal.\"If Intel offers a reasonable price, it's hard to say that the major shareholders in the Middle East will definitely refuse.\" Luo Guozhao said that GlobalFoundries' own will is one thing, but the decision on whether to sell is not in its hands. Therefore, the possibility of acquisition is still high, and at this stage, it will be a win-win decision for both parties.Catching up with Samsung and TSMCWith the implementation of IDM2.0 strategy, Intel's goal of catching up has become clearer and clearer. If it can successfully capture GlobalFoundries' market share, Intel will have only two rivals ahead, Samsung and TSMC.According to the reporter's understanding, although Intel's 7nm has not yet been launched, and Samsung and TSMC have announced that they will enter the 3nm process within the year, in practice, the performance of a chip depends on the number of transistors, so the lower the process technology, the more advanced it is. Because it can accommodate more transistors per unit area. Public information shows that the transistor density of TSMC's 5nm chip is about 173 million units/mm2, the transistor density of Samsung's 3nm chip is about 170 million units/mm2, and the transistor density of Intel's planned 7nm chip has reached 180 million units/mm2 millimeter.This also means that although it lags behind two generations of manufacturing processes, the gap between Intel and Samsung and TSMC in terms of technology is much smaller than expected. Once the 7nm technology matures, Intel will also have the strength to surpass Samsung and catch up with TSMC.It is particularly noteworthy that the latest financial report for the second quarter of 2021 shows that although TSMC's revenue growth has reached a new high, its profit is slightly worse than expected, and the estimated gross profit margin in the third quarter is not as expected.In contrast to the delicate situation, Kissinger also said in an interview with the media a few days ago that Intel will take two years to catch up with TSMC. However, Luo Guozhao believes that Intel will not be TSMC's opponent in the short term. After all, TSMC's 3nm process is still far ahead, and catching up in the manufacturing process is not an overnight achievement. This is why Intel chose to cooperate with TSMC.According to TSMC CEO Wei Zhejia, compared with the 5-nanometer process, the 3-nanometer process will increase transistor density by 70%, and mass production may begin in the second half of next year. Foreign media quoted sources as saying,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a>And Intel will be the main customers of this production line.In Ji Wei's view, Intel still has many problems to solve before surpassing TSMC. Even if it tries to advance the acquisition of GlobalFoundries, if we look at it from the perspective of acquisition resistance, GlobalFoundries has not been in good condition in recent years. In terms of influence, was<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SMI\">SMIC</a>With<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UMC\">UMC</a>Gradually widening the gap cannot shake TSMC. \"GlobalFoundries is still losing money at present. At this time, the acquisition will put some pressure on the financial statements. If Intel really wants to acquire GlobalFoundries, it may have sufficient reasons to convince investors to agree.\" Ji Wei said.","source":"tencent","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Behind the rumors of acquisition of GlobalFoundries: Intel's chip manufacturing ambitions revealed</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBehind the rumors of acquisition of GlobalFoundries: Intel's chip manufacturing ambitions revealed\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n中国经营报2021-07-24 10:39\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nA merger and acquisition plan that may be the largest in the global semiconductor industry in recent years has surfaced recently. On July 17, according to the Wall Street Journal citing people familiar with the matter,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/INTC\">Intel</a>It is studying the acquisition of GlobalFoundries (often referred to as \"GlobalFoundries\" in the industry) for US $30 billion (approximately RMB 194 billion), which was once a partner with<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSM\">TSMC</a>The equally famous global chip manufacturing giant, if this deal goes through, will become Intel's largest acquisition in history.However, the rumor was quickly denied by Grofond. On July 19, the CEO of GlobalFoundries stated that the news of negotiating an acquisition with Intel was just speculation, and denied that there had been any acquisition discussions with the former, but would continue to seek to achieve listing through IPO. In this regard, the reporter of China Business News interviewed the person in charge of Intel China, but the other party said that he would not respond to this topic.Although this official response quickly cooled the public opinion about this shocking deal that may shake the industry, there is more and more evidence that Intel hopes to make a difference in the field of chip manufacturing. Recently, the British \"Financial Times\" quoted Intel's official statement as confirming that the company is planning to invest US $20 billion (approximately RMB 129.6 billion) to build chip factories in multiple EU member states. The company is currently lobbying to obtain EU support.As one of the few leading companies in the global semiconductor industry that has retained its chip manufacturing department, Intel has begun to lag behind TSMC, whose core business is chip manufacturing foundry, in recent years, especially in terms of advanced manufacturing processes. Intel's 7 The nanometer process has not made progress. TSMC recently announced in its quarterly financial report that it has earned 10% of its revenue for nearly three quarters through the 5-nanometer process, and will also trial-produce the 3-nanometer process in the third quarter of this year.Under such a gap, whether Intel can finally succeed in the acquisition of GlobalFoundries does not seem to affect the outside world's judgment that it will strive to return to the advanced camp of chip manufacturing, and the competitive landscape of the entire global semiconductor manufacturing field may also be Marked by the rumored incident of Intel's acquisition of GlobalFoundries, it has quietly entered a new trend.The probability of acquisition remains highBehind Intel's recent actions, Pat Gelsinger (Pat Gelsinger) is regarded as the central role in promoting this round of decision-making. He officially succeeded his predecessor Bob Swan (Bob Swan) as the company's CEO in February this year. According to the Wall Street Journal, the reason Bob Swan was out is that he fell behind his main competitors because he failed to advance advanced manufacturing processes<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMD\">AMD</a>Related to.Therefore, less than a month after taking office, Kissinger made a high-profile announcement of Intel's \"IDM2.0\" vision. Among them, IDM refers to a semiconductor company covering all aspects from design to manufacturing. Since chip manufacturing requires extremely high capital investment in technology research and development, only a few giant companies have the strength to assume this role. In the field of semiconductor manufacturing, currently only Intel,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SMSN.UK\">Samsung</a>A few companies pursue the IDM model, while others adopt full-time foundry models such as TSMC.In this newly drawn IDM2.0 blueprint, the foundry business has also become Intel's most important future strategy. Kissinger said in his speech that Intel plans to become the main foundry capacity supplier in the United States and Europe, providing services to global customers. To this end, Intel will invest $20 billion to build two new factories in Arizona, open an independent foundry department and cooperate with third-party foundries.It is worth noting that when announcing the cooperation list, Kissinger directly pointed out TSMC,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SSNLF\">Samsung Electronics</a>And the name of GlobalFoundries, and these three companies are the owners that currently occupy the top three positions in the global chip foundry field. According to data from market research organization Top Industry Research Institute, in the global wafer foundry field, TSMC's market share in the second quarter of 2019 was 49.2%, followed by Samsung with 18.0% share and Grofond with 8.7%.According to public information, GlobalFoundries was established in March 2009. Its predecessor was the wafer fab of AMD, Intel's old rival in the US domestic market. Due to years of losses, it was finally sold by AMD. It was established after capital injection by Abu Dhabi Venture Capital Fund (ATIC), specializing in chip foundry business.However, in recent years, due to the unsmooth research and development of advanced manufacturing processes, GlobalFoundries has gradually lost in the competition with TSMC and Samsung, and its market share has declined again and again, which has directly led to the shrinkage of its revenue and profit scale, making it even more insufficient funds to invest in the arms race of the chip manufacturing process, thus forming an a vicious circle.According to Luo Guozhao, director of the China Laboratory of the CHIP Global Testing Center, although Intel has encountered difficulties in recent years, its stable financial performance is still at the level of a giant; On the other hand, although it is equally weak in cutting-edge manufacturing processes, GlobalFoundries has a stable production capacity supply above 10 nanometers and a market share of nearly 8%.In addition, the reporter noticed that in terms of macro policy, at the end of March this year, the U.S. official announced a round of US $50 billion local revitalization plan for the semiconductor industry to invest in chip manufacturing and research and development and accelerate the return of the manufacturing supply chain to the United States. Luo Guozhao said that under this policy, no company with an American background is more suitable for Intel than GlobalFoundries, and if Intel completes the acquisition and starts OEM, it will undoubtedly receive more subsidies from the US $50 billion.Ji Wei, a senior semiconductor analyst from Taiwan, also told reporters that through the acquisition of Intel, the United States can have more capital to put pressure on TSMC, thereby forcing TSMC to increase investment in the United States.All the above practical factors, Intel, which intends to complete its rise in the foundry field, and GlobalFoundries, which needs to be replenished by funds, can get each other's needs in the transaction, which may be the main reason for the acquisition scandal.\"If Intel offers a reasonable price, it's hard to say that the major shareholders in the Middle East will definitely refuse.\" Luo Guozhao said that GlobalFoundries' own will is one thing, but the decision on whether to sell is not in its hands. Therefore, the possibility of acquisition is still high, and at this stage, it will be a win-win decision for both parties.Catching up with Samsung and TSMCWith the implementation of IDM2.0 strategy, Intel's goal of catching up has become clearer and clearer. If it can successfully capture GlobalFoundries' market share, Intel will have only two rivals ahead, Samsung and TSMC.According to the reporter's understanding, although Intel's 7nm has not yet been launched, and Samsung and TSMC have announced that they will enter the 3nm process within the year, in practice, the performance of a chip depends on the number of transistors, so the lower the process technology, the more advanced it is. Because it can accommodate more transistors per unit area. Public information shows that the transistor density of TSMC's 5nm chip is about 173 million units/mm2, the transistor density of Samsung's 3nm chip is about 170 million units/mm2, and the transistor density of Intel's planned 7nm chip has reached 180 million units/mm2 millimeter.This also means that although it lags behind two generations of manufacturing processes, the gap between Intel and Samsung and TSMC in terms of technology is much smaller than expected. Once the 7nm technology matures, Intel will also have the strength to surpass Samsung and catch up with TSMC.It is particularly noteworthy that the latest financial report for the second quarter of 2021 shows that although TSMC's revenue growth has reached a new high, its profit is slightly worse than expected, and the estimated gross profit margin in the third quarter is not as expected.In contrast to the delicate situation, Kissinger also said in an interview with the media a few days ago that Intel will take two years to catch up with TSMC. However, Luo Guozhao believes that Intel will not be TSMC's opponent in the short term. After all, TSMC's 3nm process is still far ahead, and catching up in the manufacturing process is not an overnight achievement. This is why Intel chose to cooperate with TSMC.According to TSMC CEO Wei Zhejia, compared with the 5-nanometer process, the 3-nanometer process will increase transistor density by 70%, and mass production may begin in the second half of next year. Foreign media quoted sources as saying,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a>And Intel will be the main customers of this production line.In Ji Wei's view, Intel still has many problems to solve before surpassing TSMC. Even if it tries to advance the acquisition of GlobalFoundries, if we look at it from the perspective of acquisition resistance, GlobalFoundries has not been in good condition in recent years. In terms of influence, was<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SMI\">SMIC</a>With<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UMC\">UMC</a>Gradually widening the gap cannot shake TSMC. \"GlobalFoundries is still losing money at present. At this time, the acquisition will put some pressure on the financial statements. If Intel really wants to acquire GlobalFoundries, it may have sufficient reasons to convince investors to agree.\" Ji Wei said.\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n source：<a href=\"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN2021072410404779d73bc6&s=b\">中国经营报</a>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03e38a3a3c63bd5a9d8d8ca2d384d1c5","relate_stocks":{"159813":"芯片","INTC":"英特尔","03086":"华夏纳指","09086":"华夏纳指-U"},"source_url":"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN2021072410404779d73bc6&s=b","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/9a95c1376e76363c1401fee7d3717173","article_id":"2153133933","content_text":"一桩也许是近年来全球半导体业内最大的并购计划日前浮出水面。7月17日，据《华尔街日报》援引知情人士透露，英特尔正在研究以300亿美元（约合人民币1940亿元）的价格收购格罗方德（业界常简称为“格芯”），后者曾是与台积电齐名的全球芯片制造巨头，如果该笔交易成行，将成为英特尔有史以来最大的一笔收购。\n不过，传闻很快遭到格罗方德否认。7月19日，格罗方德CEO出面表示，与英特尔洽谈收购的消息只是推测而已，并否认与前者展开过收购方面的讨论，而是会继续寻求通过IPO方式实现上市。对此，《中国经营报》记者采访了英特尔中国区负责人，但对方表示对此话题不作回应。\n这一官方回应虽然迅速冷却了这笔有可能震动业界的惊天交易的舆论热度，但已有越来越多的证据显示，英特尔期冀在芯片制造领域有所作为。近日，英国《金融时报》引述英特尔官方说法证实，该公司正在计划投资200亿美元（约合人民币1296亿元）在多个欧盟成员国建造芯片工厂，目前该公司正在进行游说工作，以获得欧盟方面的支持。\n作为目前全球半导体产业中为数不多保留了芯片制造部门的龙头公司，英特尔近年来却在造芯环节开始落后于以芯片制造代工为核心业务的台积电，尤其是在先进制程方面，英特尔的7纳米工艺迟迟没有进展，台积电日前则在季度财报上宣布已通过5纳米工艺赚取了近三个季度10%的营收，同时还将在今年三季度试产3纳米工艺。\n如此差距之下，英特尔能否在收购格芯的进程中最终得手，似乎都已不影响外界对其将奋力重回芯片制造先进阵营的判断，而整个全球半导体制造领域的竞争格局，或也将以此次英特尔收购格芯传闻事件为标志，悄然进入新的态势。\n收购概率依然很高\n在英特尔近期连番动作背后，帕特·基辛格（Pat Gelsinger）被视为推动该轮决策的核心角色，他在今年2月正式接替了前任鲍勃·斯旺（Bob Swan）出任该公司的CEO。而据《华尔街日报》报道，鲍勃·斯旺出局的原因，正与其在推进先进制程方面不力导致落后主要竞争对手AMD有关。\n因此，履新不到一个月后，基辛格便高调对外宣布了英特尔的“IDM2.0”愿景。其中，IDM意指涵盖从设计到制造所有环节的半导体公司，由于芯片制造需要极高的资本投入技术研发，因此只有极少数巨头公司才有这一实力承担这一角色。在半导体制造领域，目前全球只有英特尔、三星等少数几家公司奉行IDM模式，其他则都采用台积电一类的专职代工模式。\n而在这张新绘制的IDM2.0蓝图中，代工业务也成为英特尔最重要的未来战略，基辛格在演讲中表示，英特尔计划成为美国和欧洲的主要代工产能供应商，为全球客户提供服务。为此，英特尔将投资200亿美元在亚利桑那州新建两家工厂、开设独立代工事务部门以及与第三方代工厂商进行合作。\n值得注意的是，在宣布合作名单时，基辛格直接点出了台积电、三星电子以及格罗方德的名字，而这三家企业正是占据目前全球芯片代工领域前三把交椅的主人。市场调研机构拓墣产业研究院数据显示，在全球晶圆代工领域，2019年第二季度台积电的市场份额为49.2%，紧随其后的为拥有18.0%份额的三星和8.7%的格罗方德。\n公开信息显示，格罗方德成立于2009年3月，其前身是英特尔在美国本土市场的老对手AMD的晶圆厂，因为连年亏损，最终被AMD脱手，经阿联酋阿布扎比创投基金 (ATIC) 注资后成立，专营芯片代工业务。\n但近年来，由于先进制程研发的进程并不顺利，格罗方德在与台积电、三星的竞争中逐渐败下阵来，市场份额一再下降，这也直接导致了其营收与利润规模的萎缩，使其更无足够的资金投入到芯片制程的军备竞赛上，从而形成恶性循环。\n在CHIP全球测试中心中国实验室主任罗国昭看来，英特尔虽然近年来遭遇困境，但稳定的财务表现仍是巨头级别；另一方面，虽然在尖端制程上同样乏力，但格罗方德在10纳米以上有稳定的产能供应与近8%的市场份额。\n此外，记者注意到，宏观政策上，今年3月底，美国官方公布了一轮规模达500亿美元的半导体产业本土振兴计划，用以投入芯片制造与研发，加速制造供应链重返美国。罗国昭表示，在这一政策下，没有比格罗方德这一美国背景的公司更适合英特尔，而英特尔如果完成收购并发力代工，无疑也能从500亿美元中获得更多的补贴。\n来自中国台湾的半导体资深分析师季维也向记者表示，美国透过英特尔这一收购案，能拥有更多向台积电施压的资本，以此逼迫台积电加大在美国的投资。\n以上种种现实因素，意欲在代工领域完成崛起的英特尔，以及需要资金补充的格罗方德，双方能够在交易中互取所需，这或许是收购绯闻传出的主要原因。\n“各取所需下，如果英特尔给出一个合理的价格，很难说中东的大股东就一定会拒绝。”罗国昭表示，格罗方德自身的意愿是一回事，但是否出售的决定权并不在其手中。因此，收购的可能性依然很高，而且在现阶段而言，这对双方都会是一个双赢的决定。\n赶超三星、台积电\n随着IDM2.0战略的践行，英特尔发力追赶的目标也已越来越清晰。如果能够成功吃下格罗方德的市场份额，英特尔前方将会只剩下三星与台积电两个对手。\n据记者了解，虽然目前英特尔的7纳米尚未推出，而三星、台积电均已宣布年内进军3纳米制程，但在实际中，一款芯片的性能取决于晶体管的数量，所以制程工艺越低越先进，因为单位面积内能容纳更多数量的晶体管。而公开信息显示，台积电5纳米芯片晶体管密度约为1.73亿颗/平方毫米，三星3纳米芯片晶体管密度约为1.7亿颗/平方毫米，英特尔规划中的7纳米芯片则达到了1.8亿颗/平方毫米。\n这也意味着，虽然落后两代制程，但英特尔在工艺方面与三星、台积电的差距比想象中要小得多，一旦7纳米技术成熟，英特尔也将有超越三星直追台积电的实力。\n尤其值得注意的是，最新的2021年二季度财报显示，虽然台积电营收增长再创新高，但获利略逊于预期，第三季预估的毛利率也不如预期。\n微妙的形势对比下，基辛格也在日前接受媒体采访时表示，英特尔将花两年时间赶上台积电。不过，罗国昭认为，短期内英特尔还不会是台积电的对手，毕竟台积电的3纳米工艺还是遥遥领先，而且制程方面的赶超不是朝夕之功，这也是英特尔选择与台积电合作的原因。\n据台积电CEO魏哲家此前透露，同5纳米工艺相比，3纳米工艺将使晶体管密度提升70%，并可能在明年下半年开始量产。外媒援引消息人士透露，苹果与英特尔将会是这一产线的主要客户。\n而在季维看来，在超过台积电之前，英特尔要解决的问题还有很多，即使其试图推进收购格罗方德，如果从收购阻力层面观察，格罗方德这几年的状况欠佳，在影响力上，被中芯国际与联电逐渐拉开差距，更无法撼动台积电。“格罗方德目前也还存在亏损，此时收购会在财务报表上造成一些压力，英特尔若真要收购格罗方德，可能要有充分的理由说服投资人同意。”季维表示。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"159813":0.9,"INTC":0.9,"03086":0.9,"09086":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5633310,"gmtCreate":1629805763747,"gmtModify":1663232843440,"authorId":3579091027208131,"author":{"id":3579091027208131,"idStr":"3579091027208131","authorId":3579091027208131,"name":"小白菜逆袭","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e6fae3ff5fe246fa905d2a09cc814fdf","vip":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-3","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"President Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $1,000,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fbeac6bb240db7da8b972e5183d050ba","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/436cdf80292b99f0a992e78750ac4e3a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/506a259a7b456f037592c3b23c779599","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.02.15","exceedPercentage":"93.42%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":174715859,"type":1,"supId":5318469,"prevId":0,"content":"666","text":"666","html":"666"},{"id":5318469,"gmtCreate":1627139845175,"gmtModify":1663231435147,"authorId":4087949335835340,"author":{"id":4087949335835340,"idStr":"4087949335835340","authorId":4087949335835340,"name":"秀秀2","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/e038d37cd29357541780e8c248a33897","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":174715859,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"什么","text":"什么","html":"什么"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":174737926,"gmtCreate":1627137996765,"gmtModify":1703484713979,"author":{"id":"3581663680495191","authorId":"3581663680495191","name":"yuliang559","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2769f9b0cdb3c39664fc7b74a5de5f0d","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3581663680495191","idStr":"3581663680495191"},"htmlText":"[微笑]&nbsp;","listText":"[微笑]&nbsp;","text":"[微笑]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/174737926","repostId":2153133933,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2153133933","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1627094380,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2153133933?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-24 10:39","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Behind the rumors of acquisition of GlobalFoundries: Intel's chip manufacturing ambitions revealed","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2153133933","media":"中国经营报","summary":"作为目前全球半导体产业中为数不多保留了芯片制造部门的龙头公司，英特尔近年来却在造芯环节开始落后于以芯片制造代工为核心业务的台积电，尤其是在先进制程方面，英特尔的7纳米工艺迟迟没有进展，台积电日前则在季度财报上宣布已通过5纳米工艺赚取了近三个季度10%的营收，同时还将在今年三季度试产3纳米工艺。","content":"A merger and acquisition plan that may be the largest in the global semiconductor industry in recent years has surfaced recently. On July 17, according to the Wall Street Journal citing people familiar with the matter,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/INTC\">Intel</a>It is studying the acquisition of GlobalFoundries (often referred to as \"GlobalFoundries\" in the industry) for US $30 billion (approximately RMB 194 billion), which was once a partner with<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSM\">TSMC</a>The equally famous global chip manufacturing giant, if this deal goes through, will become Intel's largest acquisition in history.However, the rumor was quickly denied by Grofond. On July 19, the CEO of GlobalFoundries stated that the news of negotiating an acquisition with Intel was just speculation, and denied that there had been any acquisition discussions with the former, but would continue to seek to achieve listing through IPO. In this regard, the reporter of China Business News interviewed the person in charge of Intel China, but the other party said that he would not respond to this topic.Although this official response quickly cooled the public opinion about this shocking deal that may shake the industry, there is more and more evidence that Intel hopes to make a difference in the field of chip manufacturing. Recently, the British \"Financial Times\" quoted Intel's official statement as confirming that the company is planning to invest US $20 billion (approximately RMB 129.6 billion) to build chip factories in multiple EU member states. The company is currently lobbying to obtain EU support.As one of the few leading companies in the global semiconductor industry that has retained its chip manufacturing department, Intel has begun to lag behind TSMC, whose core business is chip manufacturing foundry, in recent years, especially in terms of advanced manufacturing processes. Intel's 7 The nanometer process has not made progress. TSMC recently announced in its quarterly financial report that it has earned 10% of its revenue for nearly three quarters through the 5-nanometer process, and will also trial-produce the 3-nanometer process in the third quarter of this year.Under such a gap, whether Intel can finally succeed in the acquisition of GlobalFoundries does not seem to affect the outside world's judgment that it will strive to return to the advanced camp of chip manufacturing, and the competitive landscape of the entire global semiconductor manufacturing field may also be Marked by the rumored incident of Intel's acquisition of GlobalFoundries, it has quietly entered a new trend.The probability of acquisition remains highBehind Intel's recent actions, Pat Gelsinger (Pat Gelsinger) is regarded as the central role in promoting this round of decision-making. He officially succeeded his predecessor Bob Swan (Bob Swan) as the company's CEO in February this year. According to the Wall Street Journal, the reason Bob Swan was out is that he fell behind his main competitors because he failed to advance advanced manufacturing processes<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMD\">AMD</a>Related to.Therefore, less than a month after taking office, Kissinger made a high-profile announcement of Intel's \"IDM2.0\" vision. Among them, IDM refers to a semiconductor company covering all aspects from design to manufacturing. Since chip manufacturing requires extremely high capital investment in technology research and development, only a few giant companies have the strength to assume this role. In the field of semiconductor manufacturing, currently only Intel,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SMSN.UK\">Samsung</a>A few companies pursue the IDM model, while others adopt full-time foundry models such as TSMC.In this newly drawn IDM2.0 blueprint, the foundry business has also become Intel's most important future strategy. Kissinger said in his speech that Intel plans to become the main foundry capacity supplier in the United States and Europe, providing services to global customers. To this end, Intel will invest $20 billion to build two new factories in Arizona, open an independent foundry department and cooperate with third-party foundries.It is worth noting that when announcing the cooperation list, Kissinger directly pointed out TSMC,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SSNLF\">Samsung Electronics</a>And the name of GlobalFoundries, and these three companies are the owners that currently occupy the top three positions in the global chip foundry field. According to data from market research organization Top Industry Research Institute, in the global wafer foundry field, TSMC's market share in the second quarter of 2019 was 49.2%, followed by Samsung with 18.0% share and Grofond with 8.7%.According to public information, GlobalFoundries was established in March 2009. Its predecessor was the wafer fab of AMD, Intel's old rival in the US domestic market. Due to years of losses, it was finally sold by AMD. It was established after capital injection by Abu Dhabi Venture Capital Fund (ATIC), specializing in chip foundry business.However, in recent years, due to the unsmooth research and development of advanced manufacturing processes, GlobalFoundries has gradually lost in the competition with TSMC and Samsung, and its market share has declined again and again, which has directly led to the shrinkage of its revenue and profit scale, making it even more insufficient funds to invest in the arms race of the chip manufacturing process, thus forming an a vicious circle.According to Luo Guozhao, director of the China Laboratory of the CHIP Global Testing Center, although Intel has encountered difficulties in recent years, its stable financial performance is still at the level of a giant; On the other hand, although it is equally weak in cutting-edge manufacturing processes, GlobalFoundries has a stable production capacity supply above 10 nanometers and a market share of nearly 8%.In addition, the reporter noticed that in terms of macro policy, at the end of March this year, the U.S. official announced a round of US $50 billion local revitalization plan for the semiconductor industry to invest in chip manufacturing and research and development and accelerate the return of the manufacturing supply chain to the United States. Luo Guozhao said that under this policy, no company with an American background is more suitable for Intel than GlobalFoundries, and if Intel completes the acquisition and starts OEM, it will undoubtedly receive more subsidies from the US $50 billion.Ji Wei, a senior semiconductor analyst from Taiwan, also told reporters that through the acquisition of Intel, the United States can have more capital to put pressure on TSMC, thereby forcing TSMC to increase investment in the United States.All the above practical factors, Intel, which intends to complete its rise in the foundry field, and GlobalFoundries, which needs to be replenished by funds, can get each other's needs in the transaction, which may be the main reason for the acquisition scandal.\"If Intel offers a reasonable price, it's hard to say that the major shareholders in the Middle East will definitely refuse.\" Luo Guozhao said that GlobalFoundries' own will is one thing, but the decision on whether to sell is not in its hands. Therefore, the possibility of acquisition is still high, and at this stage, it will be a win-win decision for both parties.Catching up with Samsung and TSMCWith the implementation of IDM2.0 strategy, Intel's goal of catching up has become clearer and clearer. If it can successfully capture GlobalFoundries' market share, Intel will have only two rivals ahead, Samsung and TSMC.According to the reporter's understanding, although Intel's 7nm has not yet been launched, and Samsung and TSMC have announced that they will enter the 3nm process within the year, in practice, the performance of a chip depends on the number of transistors, so the lower the process technology, the more advanced it is. Because it can accommodate more transistors per unit area. Public information shows that the transistor density of TSMC's 5nm chip is about 173 million units/mm2, the transistor density of Samsung's 3nm chip is about 170 million units/mm2, and the transistor density of Intel's planned 7nm chip has reached 180 million units/mm2 millimeter.This also means that although it lags behind two generations of manufacturing processes, the gap between Intel and Samsung and TSMC in terms of technology is much smaller than expected. Once the 7nm technology matures, Intel will also have the strength to surpass Samsung and catch up with TSMC.It is particularly noteworthy that the latest financial report for the second quarter of 2021 shows that although TSMC's revenue growth has reached a new high, its profit is slightly worse than expected, and the estimated gross profit margin in the third quarter is not as expected.In contrast to the delicate situation, Kissinger also said in an interview with the media a few days ago that Intel will take two years to catch up with TSMC. However, Luo Guozhao believes that Intel will not be TSMC's opponent in the short term. After all, TSMC's 3nm process is still far ahead, and catching up in the manufacturing process is not an overnight achievement. This is why Intel chose to cooperate with TSMC.According to TSMC CEO Wei Zhejia, compared with the 5-nanometer process, the 3-nanometer process will increase transistor density by 70%, and mass production may begin in the second half of next year. Foreign media quoted sources as saying,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a>And Intel will be the main customers of this production line.In Ji Wei's view, Intel still has many problems to solve before surpassing TSMC. Even if it tries to advance the acquisition of GlobalFoundries, if we look at it from the perspective of acquisition resistance, GlobalFoundries has not been in good condition in recent years. In terms of influence, was<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SMI\">SMIC</a>With<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UMC\">UMC</a>Gradually widening the gap cannot shake TSMC. \"GlobalFoundries is still losing money at present. At this time, the acquisition will put some pressure on the financial statements. If Intel really wants to acquire GlobalFoundries, it may have sufficient reasons to convince investors to agree.\" Ji Wei said.","source":"tencent","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Behind the rumors of acquisition of GlobalFoundries: Intel's chip manufacturing ambitions revealed</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBehind the rumors of acquisition of GlobalFoundries: Intel's chip manufacturing ambitions revealed\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n中国经营报2021-07-24 10:39\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nA merger and acquisition plan that may be the largest in the global semiconductor industry in recent years has surfaced recently. On July 17, according to the Wall Street Journal citing people familiar with the matter,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/INTC\">Intel</a>It is studying the acquisition of GlobalFoundries (often referred to as \"GlobalFoundries\" in the industry) for US $30 billion (approximately RMB 194 billion), which was once a partner with<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSM\">TSMC</a>The equally famous global chip manufacturing giant, if this deal goes through, will become Intel's largest acquisition in history.However, the rumor was quickly denied by Grofond. On July 19, the CEO of GlobalFoundries stated that the news of negotiating an acquisition with Intel was just speculation, and denied that there had been any acquisition discussions with the former, but would continue to seek to achieve listing through IPO. In this regard, the reporter of China Business News interviewed the person in charge of Intel China, but the other party said that he would not respond to this topic.Although this official response quickly cooled the public opinion about this shocking deal that may shake the industry, there is more and more evidence that Intel hopes to make a difference in the field of chip manufacturing. Recently, the British \"Financial Times\" quoted Intel's official statement as confirming that the company is planning to invest US $20 billion (approximately RMB 129.6 billion) to build chip factories in multiple EU member states. The company is currently lobbying to obtain EU support.As one of the few leading companies in the global semiconductor industry that has retained its chip manufacturing department, Intel has begun to lag behind TSMC, whose core business is chip manufacturing foundry, in recent years, especially in terms of advanced manufacturing processes. Intel's 7 The nanometer process has not made progress. TSMC recently announced in its quarterly financial report that it has earned 10% of its revenue for nearly three quarters through the 5-nanometer process, and will also trial-produce the 3-nanometer process in the third quarter of this year.Under such a gap, whether Intel can finally succeed in the acquisition of GlobalFoundries does not seem to affect the outside world's judgment that it will strive to return to the advanced camp of chip manufacturing, and the competitive landscape of the entire global semiconductor manufacturing field may also be Marked by the rumored incident of Intel's acquisition of GlobalFoundries, it has quietly entered a new trend.The probability of acquisition remains highBehind Intel's recent actions, Pat Gelsinger (Pat Gelsinger) is regarded as the central role in promoting this round of decision-making. He officially succeeded his predecessor Bob Swan (Bob Swan) as the company's CEO in February this year. According to the Wall Street Journal, the reason Bob Swan was out is that he fell behind his main competitors because he failed to advance advanced manufacturing processes<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMD\">AMD</a>Related to.Therefore, less than a month after taking office, Kissinger made a high-profile announcement of Intel's \"IDM2.0\" vision. Among them, IDM refers to a semiconductor company covering all aspects from design to manufacturing. Since chip manufacturing requires extremely high capital investment in technology research and development, only a few giant companies have the strength to assume this role. In the field of semiconductor manufacturing, currently only Intel,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SMSN.UK\">Samsung</a>A few companies pursue the IDM model, while others adopt full-time foundry models such as TSMC.In this newly drawn IDM2.0 blueprint, the foundry business has also become Intel's most important future strategy. Kissinger said in his speech that Intel plans to become the main foundry capacity supplier in the United States and Europe, providing services to global customers. To this end, Intel will invest $20 billion to build two new factories in Arizona, open an independent foundry department and cooperate with third-party foundries.It is worth noting that when announcing the cooperation list, Kissinger directly pointed out TSMC,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SSNLF\">Samsung Electronics</a>And the name of GlobalFoundries, and these three companies are the owners that currently occupy the top three positions in the global chip foundry field. According to data from market research organization Top Industry Research Institute, in the global wafer foundry field, TSMC's market share in the second quarter of 2019 was 49.2%, followed by Samsung with 18.0% share and Grofond with 8.7%.According to public information, GlobalFoundries was established in March 2009. Its predecessor was the wafer fab of AMD, Intel's old rival in the US domestic market. Due to years of losses, it was finally sold by AMD. It was established after capital injection by Abu Dhabi Venture Capital Fund (ATIC), specializing in chip foundry business.However, in recent years, due to the unsmooth research and development of advanced manufacturing processes, GlobalFoundries has gradually lost in the competition with TSMC and Samsung, and its market share has declined again and again, which has directly led to the shrinkage of its revenue and profit scale, making it even more insufficient funds to invest in the arms race of the chip manufacturing process, thus forming an a vicious circle.According to Luo Guozhao, director of the China Laboratory of the CHIP Global Testing Center, although Intel has encountered difficulties in recent years, its stable financial performance is still at the level of a giant; On the other hand, although it is equally weak in cutting-edge manufacturing processes, GlobalFoundries has a stable production capacity supply above 10 nanometers and a market share of nearly 8%.In addition, the reporter noticed that in terms of macro policy, at the end of March this year, the U.S. official announced a round of US $50 billion local revitalization plan for the semiconductor industry to invest in chip manufacturing and research and development and accelerate the return of the manufacturing supply chain to the United States. Luo Guozhao said that under this policy, no company with an American background is more suitable for Intel than GlobalFoundries, and if Intel completes the acquisition and starts OEM, it will undoubtedly receive more subsidies from the US $50 billion.Ji Wei, a senior semiconductor analyst from Taiwan, also told reporters that through the acquisition of Intel, the United States can have more capital to put pressure on TSMC, thereby forcing TSMC to increase investment in the United States.All the above practical factors, Intel, which intends to complete its rise in the foundry field, and GlobalFoundries, which needs to be replenished by funds, can get each other's needs in the transaction, which may be the main reason for the acquisition scandal.\"If Intel offers a reasonable price, it's hard to say that the major shareholders in the Middle East will definitely refuse.\" Luo Guozhao said that GlobalFoundries' own will is one thing, but the decision on whether to sell is not in its hands. Therefore, the possibility of acquisition is still high, and at this stage, it will be a win-win decision for both parties.Catching up with Samsung and TSMCWith the implementation of IDM2.0 strategy, Intel's goal of catching up has become clearer and clearer. If it can successfully capture GlobalFoundries' market share, Intel will have only two rivals ahead, Samsung and TSMC.According to the reporter's understanding, although Intel's 7nm has not yet been launched, and Samsung and TSMC have announced that they will enter the 3nm process within the year, in practice, the performance of a chip depends on the number of transistors, so the lower the process technology, the more advanced it is. Because it can accommodate more transistors per unit area. Public information shows that the transistor density of TSMC's 5nm chip is about 173 million units/mm2, the transistor density of Samsung's 3nm chip is about 170 million units/mm2, and the transistor density of Intel's planned 7nm chip has reached 180 million units/mm2 millimeter.This also means that although it lags behind two generations of manufacturing processes, the gap between Intel and Samsung and TSMC in terms of technology is much smaller than expected. Once the 7nm technology matures, Intel will also have the strength to surpass Samsung and catch up with TSMC.It is particularly noteworthy that the latest financial report for the second quarter of 2021 shows that although TSMC's revenue growth has reached a new high, its profit is slightly worse than expected, and the estimated gross profit margin in the third quarter is not as expected.In contrast to the delicate situation, Kissinger also said in an interview with the media a few days ago that Intel will take two years to catch up with TSMC. However, Luo Guozhao believes that Intel will not be TSMC's opponent in the short term. After all, TSMC's 3nm process is still far ahead, and catching up in the manufacturing process is not an overnight achievement. This is why Intel chose to cooperate with TSMC.According to TSMC CEO Wei Zhejia, compared with the 5-nanometer process, the 3-nanometer process will increase transistor density by 70%, and mass production may begin in the second half of next year. Foreign media quoted sources as saying,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a>And Intel will be the main customers of this production line.In Ji Wei's view, Intel still has many problems to solve before surpassing TSMC. Even if it tries to advance the acquisition of GlobalFoundries, if we look at it from the perspective of acquisition resistance, GlobalFoundries has not been in good condition in recent years. In terms of influence, was<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SMI\">SMIC</a>With<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UMC\">UMC</a>Gradually widening the gap cannot shake TSMC. \"GlobalFoundries is still losing money at present. At this time, the acquisition will put some pressure on the financial statements. If Intel really wants to acquire GlobalFoundries, it may have sufficient reasons to convince investors to agree.\" Ji Wei said.\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n source：<a href=\"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN2021072410404779d73bc6&s=b\">中国经营报</a>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03e38a3a3c63bd5a9d8d8ca2d384d1c5","relate_stocks":{"159813":"芯片","INTC":"英特尔","03086":"华夏纳指","09086":"华夏纳指-U"},"source_url":"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN2021072410404779d73bc6&s=b","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/9a95c1376e76363c1401fee7d3717173","article_id":"2153133933","content_text":"一桩也许是近年来全球半导体业内最大的并购计划日前浮出水面。7月17日，据《华尔街日报》援引知情人士透露，英特尔正在研究以300亿美元（约合人民币1940亿元）的价格收购格罗方德（业界常简称为“格芯”），后者曾是与台积电齐名的全球芯片制造巨头，如果该笔交易成行，将成为英特尔有史以来最大的一笔收购。\n不过，传闻很快遭到格罗方德否认。7月19日，格罗方德CEO出面表示，与英特尔洽谈收购的消息只是推测而已，并否认与前者展开过收购方面的讨论，而是会继续寻求通过IPO方式实现上市。对此，《中国经营报》记者采访了英特尔中国区负责人，但对方表示对此话题不作回应。\n这一官方回应虽然迅速冷却了这笔有可能震动业界的惊天交易的舆论热度，但已有越来越多的证据显示，英特尔期冀在芯片制造领域有所作为。近日，英国《金融时报》引述英特尔官方说法证实，该公司正在计划投资200亿美元（约合人民币1296亿元）在多个欧盟成员国建造芯片工厂，目前该公司正在进行游说工作，以获得欧盟方面的支持。\n作为目前全球半导体产业中为数不多保留了芯片制造部门的龙头公司，英特尔近年来却在造芯环节开始落后于以芯片制造代工为核心业务的台积电，尤其是在先进制程方面，英特尔的7纳米工艺迟迟没有进展，台积电日前则在季度财报上宣布已通过5纳米工艺赚取了近三个季度10%的营收，同时还将在今年三季度试产3纳米工艺。\n如此差距之下，英特尔能否在收购格芯的进程中最终得手，似乎都已不影响外界对其将奋力重回芯片制造先进阵营的判断，而整个全球半导体制造领域的竞争格局，或也将以此次英特尔收购格芯传闻事件为标志，悄然进入新的态势。\n收购概率依然很高\n在英特尔近期连番动作背后，帕特·基辛格（Pat Gelsinger）被视为推动该轮决策的核心角色，他在今年2月正式接替了前任鲍勃·斯旺（Bob Swan）出任该公司的CEO。而据《华尔街日报》报道，鲍勃·斯旺出局的原因，正与其在推进先进制程方面不力导致落后主要竞争对手AMD有关。\n因此，履新不到一个月后，基辛格便高调对外宣布了英特尔的“IDM2.0”愿景。其中，IDM意指涵盖从设计到制造所有环节的半导体公司，由于芯片制造需要极高的资本投入技术研发，因此只有极少数巨头公司才有这一实力承担这一角色。在半导体制造领域，目前全球只有英特尔、三星等少数几家公司奉行IDM模式，其他则都采用台积电一类的专职代工模式。\n而在这张新绘制的IDM2.0蓝图中，代工业务也成为英特尔最重要的未来战略，基辛格在演讲中表示，英特尔计划成为美国和欧洲的主要代工产能供应商，为全球客户提供服务。为此，英特尔将投资200亿美元在亚利桑那州新建两家工厂、开设独立代工事务部门以及与第三方代工厂商进行合作。\n值得注意的是，在宣布合作名单时，基辛格直接点出了台积电、三星电子以及格罗方德的名字，而这三家企业正是占据目前全球芯片代工领域前三把交椅的主人。市场调研机构拓墣产业研究院数据显示，在全球晶圆代工领域，2019年第二季度台积电的市场份额为49.2%，紧随其后的为拥有18.0%份额的三星和8.7%的格罗方德。\n公开信息显示，格罗方德成立于2009年3月，其前身是英特尔在美国本土市场的老对手AMD的晶圆厂，因为连年亏损，最终被AMD脱手，经阿联酋阿布扎比创投基金 (ATIC) 注资后成立，专营芯片代工业务。\n但近年来，由于先进制程研发的进程并不顺利，格罗方德在与台积电、三星的竞争中逐渐败下阵来，市场份额一再下降，这也直接导致了其营收与利润规模的萎缩，使其更无足够的资金投入到芯片制程的军备竞赛上，从而形成恶性循环。\n在CHIP全球测试中心中国实验室主任罗国昭看来，英特尔虽然近年来遭遇困境，但稳定的财务表现仍是巨头级别；另一方面，虽然在尖端制程上同样乏力，但格罗方德在10纳米以上有稳定的产能供应与近8%的市场份额。\n此外，记者注意到，宏观政策上，今年3月底，美国官方公布了一轮规模达500亿美元的半导体产业本土振兴计划，用以投入芯片制造与研发，加速制造供应链重返美国。罗国昭表示，在这一政策下，没有比格罗方德这一美国背景的公司更适合英特尔，而英特尔如果完成收购并发力代工，无疑也能从500亿美元中获得更多的补贴。\n来自中国台湾的半导体资深分析师季维也向记者表示，美国透过英特尔这一收购案，能拥有更多向台积电施压的资本，以此逼迫台积电加大在美国的投资。\n以上种种现实因素，意欲在代工领域完成崛起的英特尔，以及需要资金补充的格罗方德，双方能够在交易中互取所需，这或许是收购绯闻传出的主要原因。\n“各取所需下，如果英特尔给出一个合理的价格，很难说中东的大股东就一定会拒绝。”罗国昭表示，格罗方德自身的意愿是一回事，但是否出售的决定权并不在其手中。因此，收购的可能性依然很高，而且在现阶段而言，这对双方都会是一个双赢的决定。\n赶超三星、台积电\n随着IDM2.0战略的践行，英特尔发力追赶的目标也已越来越清晰。如果能够成功吃下格罗方德的市场份额，英特尔前方将会只剩下三星与台积电两个对手。\n据记者了解，虽然目前英特尔的7纳米尚未推出，而三星、台积电均已宣布年内进军3纳米制程，但在实际中，一款芯片的性能取决于晶体管的数量，所以制程工艺越低越先进，因为单位面积内能容纳更多数量的晶体管。而公开信息显示，台积电5纳米芯片晶体管密度约为1.73亿颗/平方毫米，三星3纳米芯片晶体管密度约为1.7亿颗/平方毫米，英特尔规划中的7纳米芯片则达到了1.8亿颗/平方毫米。\n这也意味着，虽然落后两代制程，但英特尔在工艺方面与三星、台积电的差距比想象中要小得多，一旦7纳米技术成熟，英特尔也将有超越三星直追台积电的实力。\n尤其值得注意的是，最新的2021年二季度财报显示，虽然台积电营收增长再创新高，但获利略逊于预期，第三季预估的毛利率也不如预期。\n微妙的形势对比下，基辛格也在日前接受媒体采访时表示，英特尔将花两年时间赶上台积电。不过，罗国昭认为，短期内英特尔还不会是台积电的对手，毕竟台积电的3纳米工艺还是遥遥领先，而且制程方面的赶超不是朝夕之功，这也是英特尔选择与台积电合作的原因。\n据台积电CEO魏哲家此前透露，同5纳米工艺相比，3纳米工艺将使晶体管密度提升70%，并可能在明年下半年开始量产。外媒援引消息人士透露，苹果与英特尔将会是这一产线的主要客户。\n而在季维看来，在超过台积电之前，英特尔要解决的问题还有很多，即使其试图推进收购格罗方德，如果从收购阻力层面观察，格罗方德这几年的状况欠佳，在影响力上，被中芯国际与联电逐渐拉开差距，更无法撼动台积电。“格罗方德目前也还存在亏损，此时收购会在财务报表上造成一些压力，英特尔若真要收购格罗方德，可能要有充分的理由说服投资人同意。”季维表示。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"159813":0.9,"INTC":0.9,"03086":0.9,"09086":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5318281,"gmtCreate":1627138006589,"gmtModify":1663231434858,"authorId":3581663680495191,"author":{"id":3581663680495191,"idStr":"3581663680495191","authorId":3581663680495191,"name":"yuliang559","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2769f9b0cdb3c39664fc7b74a5de5f0d","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":174737926,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"[微笑]","text":"[微笑]","html":"[微笑]"}],"langContent":"CN"},{"id":174702339,"gmtCreate":1627135207821,"gmtModify":1703484681954,"author":{"id":"3577013325481265","authorId":"3577013325481265","name":"LLMMYY","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0673bd7a83e6b36e742df4a0eec734f4","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3577013325481265","idStr":"3577013325481265"},"htmlText":"加油","listText":"加油","text":"加油","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/174702339","repostId":2153133933,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2153133933","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1627094380,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2153133933?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-24 10:39","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Behind the rumors of acquisition of GlobalFoundries: Intel's chip manufacturing ambitions revealed","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2153133933","media":"中国经营报","summary":"作为目前全球半导体产业中为数不多保留了芯片制造部门的龙头公司，英特尔近年来却在造芯环节开始落后于以芯片制造代工为核心业务的台积电，尤其是在先进制程方面，英特尔的7纳米工艺迟迟没有进展，台积电日前则在季度财报上宣布已通过5纳米工艺赚取了近三个季度10%的营收，同时还将在今年三季度试产3纳米工艺。","content":"A merger and acquisition plan that may be the largest in the global semiconductor industry in recent years has surfaced recently. On July 17, according to the Wall Street Journal citing people familiar with the matter,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/INTC\">Intel</a>It is studying the acquisition of GlobalFoundries (often referred to as \"GlobalFoundries\" in the industry) for US $30 billion (approximately RMB 194 billion), which was once a partner with<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSM\">TSMC</a>The equally famous global chip manufacturing giant, if this deal goes through, will become Intel's largest acquisition in history.However, the rumor was quickly denied by Grofond. On July 19, the CEO of GlobalFoundries stated that the news of negotiating an acquisition with Intel was just speculation, and denied that there had been any acquisition discussions with the former, but would continue to seek to achieve listing through IPO. In this regard, the reporter of China Business News interviewed the person in charge of Intel China, but the other party said that he would not respond to this topic.Although this official response quickly cooled the public opinion about this shocking deal that may shake the industry, there is more and more evidence that Intel hopes to make a difference in the field of chip manufacturing. Recently, the British \"Financial Times\" quoted Intel's official statement as confirming that the company is planning to invest US $20 billion (approximately RMB 129.6 billion) to build chip factories in multiple EU member states. The company is currently lobbying to obtain EU support.As one of the few leading companies in the global semiconductor industry that has retained its chip manufacturing department, Intel has begun to lag behind TSMC, whose core business is chip manufacturing foundry, in recent years, especially in terms of advanced manufacturing processes. Intel's 7 The nanometer process has not made progress. TSMC recently announced in its quarterly financial report that it has earned 10% of its revenue for nearly three quarters through the 5-nanometer process, and will also trial-produce the 3-nanometer process in the third quarter of this year.Under such a gap, whether Intel can finally succeed in the acquisition of GlobalFoundries does not seem to affect the outside world's judgment that it will strive to return to the advanced camp of chip manufacturing, and the competitive landscape of the entire global semiconductor manufacturing field may also be Marked by the rumored incident of Intel's acquisition of GlobalFoundries, it has quietly entered a new trend.The probability of acquisition remains highBehind Intel's recent actions, Pat Gelsinger (Pat Gelsinger) is regarded as the central role in promoting this round of decision-making. He officially succeeded his predecessor Bob Swan (Bob Swan) as the company's CEO in February this year. According to the Wall Street Journal, the reason Bob Swan was out is that he fell behind his main competitors because he failed to advance advanced manufacturing processes<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMD\">AMD</a>Related to.Therefore, less than a month after taking office, Kissinger made a high-profile announcement of Intel's \"IDM2.0\" vision. Among them, IDM refers to a semiconductor company covering all aspects from design to manufacturing. Since chip manufacturing requires extremely high capital investment in technology research and development, only a few giant companies have the strength to assume this role. In the field of semiconductor manufacturing, currently only Intel,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SMSN.UK\">Samsung</a>A few companies pursue the IDM model, while others adopt full-time foundry models such as TSMC.In this newly drawn IDM2.0 blueprint, the foundry business has also become Intel's most important future strategy. Kissinger said in his speech that Intel plans to become the main foundry capacity supplier in the United States and Europe, providing services to global customers. To this end, Intel will invest $20 billion to build two new factories in Arizona, open an independent foundry department and cooperate with third-party foundries.It is worth noting that when announcing the cooperation list, Kissinger directly pointed out TSMC,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SSNLF\">Samsung Electronics</a>And the name of GlobalFoundries, and these three companies are the owners that currently occupy the top three positions in the global chip foundry field. According to data from market research organization Top Industry Research Institute, in the global wafer foundry field, TSMC's market share in the second quarter of 2019 was 49.2%, followed by Samsung with 18.0% share and Grofond with 8.7%.According to public information, GlobalFoundries was established in March 2009. Its predecessor was the wafer fab of AMD, Intel's old rival in the US domestic market. Due to years of losses, it was finally sold by AMD. It was established after capital injection by Abu Dhabi Venture Capital Fund (ATIC), specializing in chip foundry business.However, in recent years, due to the unsmooth research and development of advanced manufacturing processes, GlobalFoundries has gradually lost in the competition with TSMC and Samsung, and its market share has declined again and again, which has directly led to the shrinkage of its revenue and profit scale, making it even more insufficient funds to invest in the arms race of the chip manufacturing process, thus forming an a vicious circle.According to Luo Guozhao, director of the China Laboratory of the CHIP Global Testing Center, although Intel has encountered difficulties in recent years, its stable financial performance is still at the level of a giant; On the other hand, although it is equally weak in cutting-edge manufacturing processes, GlobalFoundries has a stable production capacity supply above 10 nanometers and a market share of nearly 8%.In addition, the reporter noticed that in terms of macro policy, at the end of March this year, the U.S. official announced a round of US $50 billion local revitalization plan for the semiconductor industry to invest in chip manufacturing and research and development and accelerate the return of the manufacturing supply chain to the United States. Luo Guozhao said that under this policy, no company with an American background is more suitable for Intel than GlobalFoundries, and if Intel completes the acquisition and starts OEM, it will undoubtedly receive more subsidies from the US $50 billion.Ji Wei, a senior semiconductor analyst from Taiwan, also told reporters that through the acquisition of Intel, the United States can have more capital to put pressure on TSMC, thereby forcing TSMC to increase investment in the United States.All the above practical factors, Intel, which intends to complete its rise in the foundry field, and GlobalFoundries, which needs to be replenished by funds, can get each other's needs in the transaction, which may be the main reason for the acquisition scandal.\"If Intel offers a reasonable price, it's hard to say that the major shareholders in the Middle East will definitely refuse.\" Luo Guozhao said that GlobalFoundries' own will is one thing, but the decision on whether to sell is not in its hands. Therefore, the possibility of acquisition is still high, and at this stage, it will be a win-win decision for both parties.Catching up with Samsung and TSMCWith the implementation of IDM2.0 strategy, Intel's goal of catching up has become clearer and clearer. If it can successfully capture GlobalFoundries' market share, Intel will have only two rivals ahead, Samsung and TSMC.According to the reporter's understanding, although Intel's 7nm has not yet been launched, and Samsung and TSMC have announced that they will enter the 3nm process within the year, in practice, the performance of a chip depends on the number of transistors, so the lower the process technology, the more advanced it is. Because it can accommodate more transistors per unit area. Public information shows that the transistor density of TSMC's 5nm chip is about 173 million units/mm2, the transistor density of Samsung's 3nm chip is about 170 million units/mm2, and the transistor density of Intel's planned 7nm chip has reached 180 million units/mm2 millimeter.This also means that although it lags behind two generations of manufacturing processes, the gap between Intel and Samsung and TSMC in terms of technology is much smaller than expected. Once the 7nm technology matures, Intel will also have the strength to surpass Samsung and catch up with TSMC.It is particularly noteworthy that the latest financial report for the second quarter of 2021 shows that although TSMC's revenue growth has reached a new high, its profit is slightly worse than expected, and the estimated gross profit margin in the third quarter is not as expected.In contrast to the delicate situation, Kissinger also said in an interview with the media a few days ago that Intel will take two years to catch up with TSMC. However, Luo Guozhao believes that Intel will not be TSMC's opponent in the short term. After all, TSMC's 3nm process is still far ahead, and catching up in the manufacturing process is not an overnight achievement. This is why Intel chose to cooperate with TSMC.According to TSMC CEO Wei Zhejia, compared with the 5-nanometer process, the 3-nanometer process will increase transistor density by 70%, and mass production may begin in the second half of next year. Foreign media quoted sources as saying,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a>And Intel will be the main customers of this production line.In Ji Wei's view, Intel still has many problems to solve before surpassing TSMC. Even if it tries to advance the acquisition of GlobalFoundries, if we look at it from the perspective of acquisition resistance, GlobalFoundries has not been in good condition in recent years. In terms of influence, was<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SMI\">SMIC</a>With<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UMC\">UMC</a>Gradually widening the gap cannot shake TSMC. \"GlobalFoundries is still losing money at present. At this time, the acquisition will put some pressure on the financial statements. If Intel really wants to acquire GlobalFoundries, it may have sufficient reasons to convince investors to agree.\" Ji Wei said.","source":"tencent","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Behind the rumors of acquisition of GlobalFoundries: Intel's chip manufacturing ambitions revealed</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBehind the rumors of acquisition of GlobalFoundries: Intel's chip manufacturing ambitions revealed\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n中国经营报2021-07-24 10:39\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nA merger and acquisition plan that may be the largest in the global semiconductor industry in recent years has surfaced recently. On July 17, according to the Wall Street Journal citing people familiar with the matter,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/INTC\">Intel</a>It is studying the acquisition of GlobalFoundries (often referred to as \"GlobalFoundries\" in the industry) for US $30 billion (approximately RMB 194 billion), which was once a partner with<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSM\">TSMC</a>The equally famous global chip manufacturing giant, if this deal goes through, will become Intel's largest acquisition in history.However, the rumor was quickly denied by Grofond. On July 19, the CEO of GlobalFoundries stated that the news of negotiating an acquisition with Intel was just speculation, and denied that there had been any acquisition discussions with the former, but would continue to seek to achieve listing through IPO. In this regard, the reporter of China Business News interviewed the person in charge of Intel China, but the other party said that he would not respond to this topic.Although this official response quickly cooled the public opinion about this shocking deal that may shake the industry, there is more and more evidence that Intel hopes to make a difference in the field of chip manufacturing. Recently, the British \"Financial Times\" quoted Intel's official statement as confirming that the company is planning to invest US $20 billion (approximately RMB 129.6 billion) to build chip factories in multiple EU member states. The company is currently lobbying to obtain EU support.As one of the few leading companies in the global semiconductor industry that has retained its chip manufacturing department, Intel has begun to lag behind TSMC, whose core business is chip manufacturing foundry, in recent years, especially in terms of advanced manufacturing processes. Intel's 7 The nanometer process has not made progress. TSMC recently announced in its quarterly financial report that it has earned 10% of its revenue for nearly three quarters through the 5-nanometer process, and will also trial-produce the 3-nanometer process in the third quarter of this year.Under such a gap, whether Intel can finally succeed in the acquisition of GlobalFoundries does not seem to affect the outside world's judgment that it will strive to return to the advanced camp of chip manufacturing, and the competitive landscape of the entire global semiconductor manufacturing field may also be Marked by the rumored incident of Intel's acquisition of GlobalFoundries, it has quietly entered a new trend.The probability of acquisition remains highBehind Intel's recent actions, Pat Gelsinger (Pat Gelsinger) is regarded as the central role in promoting this round of decision-making. He officially succeeded his predecessor Bob Swan (Bob Swan) as the company's CEO in February this year. According to the Wall Street Journal, the reason Bob Swan was out is that he fell behind his main competitors because he failed to advance advanced manufacturing processes<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMD\">AMD</a>Related to.Therefore, less than a month after taking office, Kissinger made a high-profile announcement of Intel's \"IDM2.0\" vision. Among them, IDM refers to a semiconductor company covering all aspects from design to manufacturing. Since chip manufacturing requires extremely high capital investment in technology research and development, only a few giant companies have the strength to assume this role. In the field of semiconductor manufacturing, currently only Intel,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SMSN.UK\">Samsung</a>A few companies pursue the IDM model, while others adopt full-time foundry models such as TSMC.In this newly drawn IDM2.0 blueprint, the foundry business has also become Intel's most important future strategy. Kissinger said in his speech that Intel plans to become the main foundry capacity supplier in the United States and Europe, providing services to global customers. To this end, Intel will invest $20 billion to build two new factories in Arizona, open an independent foundry department and cooperate with third-party foundries.It is worth noting that when announcing the cooperation list, Kissinger directly pointed out TSMC,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SSNLF\">Samsung Electronics</a>And the name of GlobalFoundries, and these three companies are the owners that currently occupy the top three positions in the global chip foundry field. According to data from market research organization Top Industry Research Institute, in the global wafer foundry field, TSMC's market share in the second quarter of 2019 was 49.2%, followed by Samsung with 18.0% share and Grofond with 8.7%.According to public information, GlobalFoundries was established in March 2009. Its predecessor was the wafer fab of AMD, Intel's old rival in the US domestic market. Due to years of losses, it was finally sold by AMD. It was established after capital injection by Abu Dhabi Venture Capital Fund (ATIC), specializing in chip foundry business.However, in recent years, due to the unsmooth research and development of advanced manufacturing processes, GlobalFoundries has gradually lost in the competition with TSMC and Samsung, and its market share has declined again and again, which has directly led to the shrinkage of its revenue and profit scale, making it even more insufficient funds to invest in the arms race of the chip manufacturing process, thus forming an a vicious circle.According to Luo Guozhao, director of the China Laboratory of the CHIP Global Testing Center, although Intel has encountered difficulties in recent years, its stable financial performance is still at the level of a giant; On the other hand, although it is equally weak in cutting-edge manufacturing processes, GlobalFoundries has a stable production capacity supply above 10 nanometers and a market share of nearly 8%.In addition, the reporter noticed that in terms of macro policy, at the end of March this year, the U.S. official announced a round of US $50 billion local revitalization plan for the semiconductor industry to invest in chip manufacturing and research and development and accelerate the return of the manufacturing supply chain to the United States. Luo Guozhao said that under this policy, no company with an American background is more suitable for Intel than GlobalFoundries, and if Intel completes the acquisition and starts OEM, it will undoubtedly receive more subsidies from the US $50 billion.Ji Wei, a senior semiconductor analyst from Taiwan, also told reporters that through the acquisition of Intel, the United States can have more capital to put pressure on TSMC, thereby forcing TSMC to increase investment in the United States.All the above practical factors, Intel, which intends to complete its rise in the foundry field, and GlobalFoundries, which needs to be replenished by funds, can get each other's needs in the transaction, which may be the main reason for the acquisition scandal.\"If Intel offers a reasonable price, it's hard to say that the major shareholders in the Middle East will definitely refuse.\" Luo Guozhao said that GlobalFoundries' own will is one thing, but the decision on whether to sell is not in its hands. Therefore, the possibility of acquisition is still high, and at this stage, it will be a win-win decision for both parties.Catching up with Samsung and TSMCWith the implementation of IDM2.0 strategy, Intel's goal of catching up has become clearer and clearer. If it can successfully capture GlobalFoundries' market share, Intel will have only two rivals ahead, Samsung and TSMC.According to the reporter's understanding, although Intel's 7nm has not yet been launched, and Samsung and TSMC have announced that they will enter the 3nm process within the year, in practice, the performance of a chip depends on the number of transistors, so the lower the process technology, the more advanced it is. Because it can accommodate more transistors per unit area. Public information shows that the transistor density of TSMC's 5nm chip is about 173 million units/mm2, the transistor density of Samsung's 3nm chip is about 170 million units/mm2, and the transistor density of Intel's planned 7nm chip has reached 180 million units/mm2 millimeter.This also means that although it lags behind two generations of manufacturing processes, the gap between Intel and Samsung and TSMC in terms of technology is much smaller than expected. Once the 7nm technology matures, Intel will also have the strength to surpass Samsung and catch up with TSMC.It is particularly noteworthy that the latest financial report for the second quarter of 2021 shows that although TSMC's revenue growth has reached a new high, its profit is slightly worse than expected, and the estimated gross profit margin in the third quarter is not as expected.In contrast to the delicate situation, Kissinger also said in an interview with the media a few days ago that Intel will take two years to catch up with TSMC. However, Luo Guozhao believes that Intel will not be TSMC's opponent in the short term. After all, TSMC's 3nm process is still far ahead, and catching up in the manufacturing process is not an overnight achievement. This is why Intel chose to cooperate with TSMC.According to TSMC CEO Wei Zhejia, compared with the 5-nanometer process, the 3-nanometer process will increase transistor density by 70%, and mass production may begin in the second half of next year. Foreign media quoted sources as saying,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a>And Intel will be the main customers of this production line.In Ji Wei's view, Intel still has many problems to solve before surpassing TSMC. Even if it tries to advance the acquisition of GlobalFoundries, if we look at it from the perspective of acquisition resistance, GlobalFoundries has not been in good condition in recent years. In terms of influence, was<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SMI\">SMIC</a>With<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UMC\">UMC</a>Gradually widening the gap cannot shake TSMC. \"GlobalFoundries is still losing money at present. At this time, the acquisition will put some pressure on the financial statements. If Intel really wants to acquire GlobalFoundries, it may have sufficient reasons to convince investors to agree.\" Ji Wei said.\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n source：<a href=\"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN2021072410404779d73bc6&s=b\">中国经营报</a>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03e38a3a3c63bd5a9d8d8ca2d384d1c5","relate_stocks":{"159813":"芯片","INTC":"英特尔","03086":"华夏纳指","09086":"华夏纳指-U"},"source_url":"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN2021072410404779d73bc6&s=b","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/9a95c1376e76363c1401fee7d3717173","article_id":"2153133933","content_text":"一桩也许是近年来全球半导体业内最大的并购计划日前浮出水面。7月17日，据《华尔街日报》援引知情人士透露，英特尔正在研究以300亿美元（约合人民币1940亿元）的价格收购格罗方德（业界常简称为“格芯”），后者曾是与台积电齐名的全球芯片制造巨头，如果该笔交易成行，将成为英特尔有史以来最大的一笔收购。\n不过，传闻很快遭到格罗方德否认。7月19日，格罗方德CEO出面表示，与英特尔洽谈收购的消息只是推测而已，并否认与前者展开过收购方面的讨论，而是会继续寻求通过IPO方式实现上市。对此，《中国经营报》记者采访了英特尔中国区负责人，但对方表示对此话题不作回应。\n这一官方回应虽然迅速冷却了这笔有可能震动业界的惊天交易的舆论热度，但已有越来越多的证据显示，英特尔期冀在芯片制造领域有所作为。近日，英国《金融时报》引述英特尔官方说法证实，该公司正在计划投资200亿美元（约合人民币1296亿元）在多个欧盟成员国建造芯片工厂，目前该公司正在进行游说工作，以获得欧盟方面的支持。\n作为目前全球半导体产业中为数不多保留了芯片制造部门的龙头公司，英特尔近年来却在造芯环节开始落后于以芯片制造代工为核心业务的台积电，尤其是在先进制程方面，英特尔的7纳米工艺迟迟没有进展，台积电日前则在季度财报上宣布已通过5纳米工艺赚取了近三个季度10%的营收，同时还将在今年三季度试产3纳米工艺。\n如此差距之下，英特尔能否在收购格芯的进程中最终得手，似乎都已不影响外界对其将奋力重回芯片制造先进阵营的判断，而整个全球半导体制造领域的竞争格局，或也将以此次英特尔收购格芯传闻事件为标志，悄然进入新的态势。\n收购概率依然很高\n在英特尔近期连番动作背后，帕特·基辛格（Pat Gelsinger）被视为推动该轮决策的核心角色，他在今年2月正式接替了前任鲍勃·斯旺（Bob Swan）出任该公司的CEO。而据《华尔街日报》报道，鲍勃·斯旺出局的原因，正与其在推进先进制程方面不力导致落后主要竞争对手AMD有关。\n因此，履新不到一个月后，基辛格便高调对外宣布了英特尔的“IDM2.0”愿景。其中，IDM意指涵盖从设计到制造所有环节的半导体公司，由于芯片制造需要极高的资本投入技术研发，因此只有极少数巨头公司才有这一实力承担这一角色。在半导体制造领域，目前全球只有英特尔、三星等少数几家公司奉行IDM模式，其他则都采用台积电一类的专职代工模式。\n而在这张新绘制的IDM2.0蓝图中，代工业务也成为英特尔最重要的未来战略，基辛格在演讲中表示，英特尔计划成为美国和欧洲的主要代工产能供应商，为全球客户提供服务。为此，英特尔将投资200亿美元在亚利桑那州新建两家工厂、开设独立代工事务部门以及与第三方代工厂商进行合作。\n值得注意的是，在宣布合作名单时，基辛格直接点出了台积电、三星电子以及格罗方德的名字，而这三家企业正是占据目前全球芯片代工领域前三把交椅的主人。市场调研机构拓墣产业研究院数据显示，在全球晶圆代工领域，2019年第二季度台积电的市场份额为49.2%，紧随其后的为拥有18.0%份额的三星和8.7%的格罗方德。\n公开信息显示，格罗方德成立于2009年3月，其前身是英特尔在美国本土市场的老对手AMD的晶圆厂，因为连年亏损，最终被AMD脱手，经阿联酋阿布扎比创投基金 (ATIC) 注资后成立，专营芯片代工业务。\n但近年来，由于先进制程研发的进程并不顺利，格罗方德在与台积电、三星的竞争中逐渐败下阵来，市场份额一再下降，这也直接导致了其营收与利润规模的萎缩，使其更无足够的资金投入到芯片制程的军备竞赛上，从而形成恶性循环。\n在CHIP全球测试中心中国实验室主任罗国昭看来，英特尔虽然近年来遭遇困境，但稳定的财务表现仍是巨头级别；另一方面，虽然在尖端制程上同样乏力，但格罗方德在10纳米以上有稳定的产能供应与近8%的市场份额。\n此外，记者注意到，宏观政策上，今年3月底，美国官方公布了一轮规模达500亿美元的半导体产业本土振兴计划，用以投入芯片制造与研发，加速制造供应链重返美国。罗国昭表示，在这一政策下，没有比格罗方德这一美国背景的公司更适合英特尔，而英特尔如果完成收购并发力代工，无疑也能从500亿美元中获得更多的补贴。\n来自中国台湾的半导体资深分析师季维也向记者表示，美国透过英特尔这一收购案，能拥有更多向台积电施压的资本，以此逼迫台积电加大在美国的投资。\n以上种种现实因素，意欲在代工领域完成崛起的英特尔，以及需要资金补充的格罗方德，双方能够在交易中互取所需，这或许是收购绯闻传出的主要原因。\n“各取所需下，如果英特尔给出一个合理的价格，很难说中东的大股东就一定会拒绝。”罗国昭表示，格罗方德自身的意愿是一回事，但是否出售的决定权并不在其手中。因此，收购的可能性依然很高，而且在现阶段而言，这对双方都会是一个双赢的决定。\n赶超三星、台积电\n随着IDM2.0战略的践行，英特尔发力追赶的目标也已越来越清晰。如果能够成功吃下格罗方德的市场份额，英特尔前方将会只剩下三星与台积电两个对手。\n据记者了解，虽然目前英特尔的7纳米尚未推出，而三星、台积电均已宣布年内进军3纳米制程，但在实际中，一款芯片的性能取决于晶体管的数量，所以制程工艺越低越先进，因为单位面积内能容纳更多数量的晶体管。而公开信息显示，台积电5纳米芯片晶体管密度约为1.73亿颗/平方毫米，三星3纳米芯片晶体管密度约为1.7亿颗/平方毫米，英特尔规划中的7纳米芯片则达到了1.8亿颗/平方毫米。\n这也意味着，虽然落后两代制程，但英特尔在工艺方面与三星、台积电的差距比想象中要小得多，一旦7纳米技术成熟，英特尔也将有超越三星直追台积电的实力。\n尤其值得注意的是，最新的2021年二季度财报显示，虽然台积电营收增长再创新高，但获利略逊于预期，第三季预估的毛利率也不如预期。\n微妙的形势对比下，基辛格也在日前接受媒体采访时表示，英特尔将花两年时间赶上台积电。不过，罗国昭认为，短期内英特尔还不会是台积电的对手，毕竟台积电的3纳米工艺还是遥遥领先，而且制程方面的赶超不是朝夕之功，这也是英特尔选择与台积电合作的原因。\n据台积电CEO魏哲家此前透露，同5纳米工艺相比，3纳米工艺将使晶体管密度提升70%，并可能在明年下半年开始量产。外媒援引消息人士透露，苹果与英特尔将会是这一产线的主要客户。\n而在季维看来，在超过台积电之前，英特尔要解决的问题还有很多，即使其试图推进收购格罗方德，如果从收购阻力层面观察，格罗方德这几年的状况欠佳，在影响力上，被中芯国际与联电逐渐拉开差距，更无法撼动台积电。“格罗方德目前也还存在亏损，此时收购会在财务报表上造成一些压力，英特尔若真要收购格罗方德，可能要有充分的理由说服投资人同意。”季维表示。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"159813":0.9,"INTC":0.9,"03086":0.9,"09086":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"CN"},{"id":174560443,"gmtCreate":1627112154782,"gmtModify":1703484459037,"author":{"id":"3574387078391491","authorId":"3574387078391491","name":"zh2021","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c227b611b9691752cedc6b263256bae1","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3574387078391491","idStr":"3574387078391491"},"htmlText":"我想試試被英特爾收購的感覺","listText":"我想試試被英特爾收購的感覺","text":"我想試試被英特爾收購的感覺","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/174560443","repostId":2153133933,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2153133933","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1627094380,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2153133933?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-24 10:39","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Behind the rumors of acquisition of GlobalFoundries: Intel's chip manufacturing ambitions revealed","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2153133933","media":"中国经营报","summary":"作为目前全球半导体产业中为数不多保留了芯片制造部门的龙头公司，英特尔近年来却在造芯环节开始落后于以芯片制造代工为核心业务的台积电，尤其是在先进制程方面，英特尔的7纳米工艺迟迟没有进展，台积电日前则在季度财报上宣布已通过5纳米工艺赚取了近三个季度10%的营收，同时还将在今年三季度试产3纳米工艺。","content":"A merger and acquisition plan that may be the largest in the global semiconductor industry in recent years has surfaced recently. On July 17, according to the Wall Street Journal citing people familiar with the matter,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/INTC\">Intel</a>It is studying the acquisition of GlobalFoundries (often referred to as \"GlobalFoundries\" in the industry) for US $30 billion (approximately RMB 194 billion), which was once a partner with<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSM\">TSMC</a>The equally famous global chip manufacturing giant, if this deal goes through, will become Intel's largest acquisition in history.However, the rumor was quickly denied by Grofond. On July 19, the CEO of GlobalFoundries stated that the news of negotiating an acquisition with Intel was just speculation, and denied that there had been any acquisition discussions with the former, but would continue to seek to achieve listing through IPO. In this regard, the reporter of China Business News interviewed the person in charge of Intel China, but the other party said that he would not respond to this topic.Although this official response quickly cooled the public opinion about this shocking deal that may shake the industry, there is more and more evidence that Intel hopes to make a difference in the field of chip manufacturing. Recently, the British \"Financial Times\" quoted Intel's official statement as confirming that the company is planning to invest US $20 billion (approximately RMB 129.6 billion) to build chip factories in multiple EU member states. The company is currently lobbying to obtain EU support.As one of the few leading companies in the global semiconductor industry that has retained its chip manufacturing department, Intel has begun to lag behind TSMC, whose core business is chip manufacturing foundry, in recent years, especially in terms of advanced manufacturing processes. Intel's 7 The nanometer process has not made progress. TSMC recently announced in its quarterly financial report that it has earned 10% of its revenue for nearly three quarters through the 5-nanometer process, and will also trial-produce the 3-nanometer process in the third quarter of this year.Under such a gap, whether Intel can finally succeed in the acquisition of GlobalFoundries does not seem to affect the outside world's judgment that it will strive to return to the advanced camp of chip manufacturing, and the competitive landscape of the entire global semiconductor manufacturing field may also be Marked by the rumored incident of Intel's acquisition of GlobalFoundries, it has quietly entered a new trend.The probability of acquisition remains highBehind Intel's recent actions, Pat Gelsinger (Pat Gelsinger) is regarded as the central role in promoting this round of decision-making. He officially succeeded his predecessor Bob Swan (Bob Swan) as the company's CEO in February this year. According to the Wall Street Journal, the reason Bob Swan was out is that he fell behind his main competitors because he failed to advance advanced manufacturing processes<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMD\">AMD</a>Related to.Therefore, less than a month after taking office, Kissinger made a high-profile announcement of Intel's \"IDM2.0\" vision. Among them, IDM refers to a semiconductor company covering all aspects from design to manufacturing. Since chip manufacturing requires extremely high capital investment in technology research and development, only a few giant companies have the strength to assume this role. In the field of semiconductor manufacturing, currently only Intel,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SMSN.UK\">Samsung</a>A few companies pursue the IDM model, while others adopt full-time foundry models such as TSMC.In this newly drawn IDM2.0 blueprint, the foundry business has also become Intel's most important future strategy. Kissinger said in his speech that Intel plans to become the main foundry capacity supplier in the United States and Europe, providing services to global customers. To this end, Intel will invest $20 billion to build two new factories in Arizona, open an independent foundry department and cooperate with third-party foundries.It is worth noting that when announcing the cooperation list, Kissinger directly pointed out TSMC,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SSNLF\">Samsung Electronics</a>And the name of GlobalFoundries, and these three companies are the owners that currently occupy the top three positions in the global chip foundry field. According to data from market research organization Top Industry Research Institute, in the global wafer foundry field, TSMC's market share in the second quarter of 2019 was 49.2%, followed by Samsung with 18.0% share and Grofond with 8.7%.According to public information, GlobalFoundries was established in March 2009. Its predecessor was the wafer fab of AMD, Intel's old rival in the US domestic market. Due to years of losses, it was finally sold by AMD. It was established after capital injection by Abu Dhabi Venture Capital Fund (ATIC), specializing in chip foundry business.However, in recent years, due to the unsmooth research and development of advanced manufacturing processes, GlobalFoundries has gradually lost in the competition with TSMC and Samsung, and its market share has declined again and again, which has directly led to the shrinkage of its revenue and profit scale, making it even more insufficient funds to invest in the arms race of the chip manufacturing process, thus forming an a vicious circle.According to Luo Guozhao, director of the China Laboratory of the CHIP Global Testing Center, although Intel has encountered difficulties in recent years, its stable financial performance is still at the level of a giant; On the other hand, although it is equally weak in cutting-edge manufacturing processes, GlobalFoundries has a stable production capacity supply above 10 nanometers and a market share of nearly 8%.In addition, the reporter noticed that in terms of macro policy, at the end of March this year, the U.S. official announced a round of US $50 billion local revitalization plan for the semiconductor industry to invest in chip manufacturing and research and development and accelerate the return of the manufacturing supply chain to the United States. Luo Guozhao said that under this policy, no company with an American background is more suitable for Intel than GlobalFoundries, and if Intel completes the acquisition and starts OEM, it will undoubtedly receive more subsidies from the US $50 billion.Ji Wei, a senior semiconductor analyst from Taiwan, also told reporters that through the acquisition of Intel, the United States can have more capital to put pressure on TSMC, thereby forcing TSMC to increase investment in the United States.All the above practical factors, Intel, which intends to complete its rise in the foundry field, and GlobalFoundries, which needs to be replenished by funds, can get each other's needs in the transaction, which may be the main reason for the acquisition scandal.\"If Intel offers a reasonable price, it's hard to say that the major shareholders in the Middle East will definitely refuse.\" Luo Guozhao said that GlobalFoundries' own will is one thing, but the decision on whether to sell is not in its hands. Therefore, the possibility of acquisition is still high, and at this stage, it will be a win-win decision for both parties.Catching up with Samsung and TSMCWith the implementation of IDM2.0 strategy, Intel's goal of catching up has become clearer and clearer. If it can successfully capture GlobalFoundries' market share, Intel will have only two rivals ahead, Samsung and TSMC.According to the reporter's understanding, although Intel's 7nm has not yet been launched, and Samsung and TSMC have announced that they will enter the 3nm process within the year, in practice, the performance of a chip depends on the number of transistors, so the lower the process technology, the more advanced it is. Because it can accommodate more transistors per unit area. Public information shows that the transistor density of TSMC's 5nm chip is about 173 million units/mm2, the transistor density of Samsung's 3nm chip is about 170 million units/mm2, and the transistor density of Intel's planned 7nm chip has reached 180 million units/mm2 millimeter.This also means that although it lags behind two generations of manufacturing processes, the gap between Intel and Samsung and TSMC in terms of technology is much smaller than expected. Once the 7nm technology matures, Intel will also have the strength to surpass Samsung and catch up with TSMC.It is particularly noteworthy that the latest financial report for the second quarter of 2021 shows that although TSMC's revenue growth has reached a new high, its profit is slightly worse than expected, and the estimated gross profit margin in the third quarter is not as expected.In contrast to the delicate situation, Kissinger also said in an interview with the media a few days ago that Intel will take two years to catch up with TSMC. However, Luo Guozhao believes that Intel will not be TSMC's opponent in the short term. After all, TSMC's 3nm process is still far ahead, and catching up in the manufacturing process is not an overnight achievement. This is why Intel chose to cooperate with TSMC.According to TSMC CEO Wei Zhejia, compared with the 5-nanometer process, the 3-nanometer process will increase transistor density by 70%, and mass production may begin in the second half of next year. Foreign media quoted sources as saying,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a>And Intel will be the main customers of this production line.In Ji Wei's view, Intel still has many problems to solve before surpassing TSMC. Even if it tries to advance the acquisition of GlobalFoundries, if we look at it from the perspective of acquisition resistance, GlobalFoundries has not been in good condition in recent years. In terms of influence, was<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SMI\">SMIC</a>With<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UMC\">UMC</a>Gradually widening the gap cannot shake TSMC. \"GlobalFoundries is still losing money at present. At this time, the acquisition will put some pressure on the financial statements. If Intel really wants to acquire GlobalFoundries, it may have sufficient reasons to convince investors to agree.\" Ji Wei said.","source":"tencent","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Behind the rumors of acquisition of GlobalFoundries: Intel's chip manufacturing ambitions revealed</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBehind the rumors of acquisition of GlobalFoundries: Intel's chip manufacturing ambitions revealed\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n中国经营报2021-07-24 10:39\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nA merger and acquisition plan that may be the largest in the global semiconductor industry in recent years has surfaced recently. On July 17, according to the Wall Street Journal citing people familiar with the matter,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/INTC\">Intel</a>It is studying the acquisition of GlobalFoundries (often referred to as \"GlobalFoundries\" in the industry) for US $30 billion (approximately RMB 194 billion), which was once a partner with<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSM\">TSMC</a>The equally famous global chip manufacturing giant, if this deal goes through, will become Intel's largest acquisition in history.However, the rumor was quickly denied by Grofond. On July 19, the CEO of GlobalFoundries stated that the news of negotiating an acquisition with Intel was just speculation, and denied that there had been any acquisition discussions with the former, but would continue to seek to achieve listing through IPO. In this regard, the reporter of China Business News interviewed the person in charge of Intel China, but the other party said that he would not respond to this topic.Although this official response quickly cooled the public opinion about this shocking deal that may shake the industry, there is more and more evidence that Intel hopes to make a difference in the field of chip manufacturing. Recently, the British \"Financial Times\" quoted Intel's official statement as confirming that the company is planning to invest US $20 billion (approximately RMB 129.6 billion) to build chip factories in multiple EU member states. The company is currently lobbying to obtain EU support.As one of the few leading companies in the global semiconductor industry that has retained its chip manufacturing department, Intel has begun to lag behind TSMC, whose core business is chip manufacturing foundry, in recent years, especially in terms of advanced manufacturing processes. Intel's 7 The nanometer process has not made progress. TSMC recently announced in its quarterly financial report that it has earned 10% of its revenue for nearly three quarters through the 5-nanometer process, and will also trial-produce the 3-nanometer process in the third quarter of this year.Under such a gap, whether Intel can finally succeed in the acquisition of GlobalFoundries does not seem to affect the outside world's judgment that it will strive to return to the advanced camp of chip manufacturing, and the competitive landscape of the entire global semiconductor manufacturing field may also be Marked by the rumored incident of Intel's acquisition of GlobalFoundries, it has quietly entered a new trend.The probability of acquisition remains highBehind Intel's recent actions, Pat Gelsinger (Pat Gelsinger) is regarded as the central role in promoting this round of decision-making. He officially succeeded his predecessor Bob Swan (Bob Swan) as the company's CEO in February this year. According to the Wall Street Journal, the reason Bob Swan was out is that he fell behind his main competitors because he failed to advance advanced manufacturing processes<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMD\">AMD</a>Related to.Therefore, less than a month after taking office, Kissinger made a high-profile announcement of Intel's \"IDM2.0\" vision. Among them, IDM refers to a semiconductor company covering all aspects from design to manufacturing. Since chip manufacturing requires extremely high capital investment in technology research and development, only a few giant companies have the strength to assume this role. In the field of semiconductor manufacturing, currently only Intel,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SMSN.UK\">Samsung</a>A few companies pursue the IDM model, while others adopt full-time foundry models such as TSMC.In this newly drawn IDM2.0 blueprint, the foundry business has also become Intel's most important future strategy. Kissinger said in his speech that Intel plans to become the main foundry capacity supplier in the United States and Europe, providing services to global customers. To this end, Intel will invest $20 billion to build two new factories in Arizona, open an independent foundry department and cooperate with third-party foundries.It is worth noting that when announcing the cooperation list, Kissinger directly pointed out TSMC,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SSNLF\">Samsung Electronics</a>And the name of GlobalFoundries, and these three companies are the owners that currently occupy the top three positions in the global chip foundry field. According to data from market research organization Top Industry Research Institute, in the global wafer foundry field, TSMC's market share in the second quarter of 2019 was 49.2%, followed by Samsung with 18.0% share and Grofond with 8.7%.According to public information, GlobalFoundries was established in March 2009. Its predecessor was the wafer fab of AMD, Intel's old rival in the US domestic market. Due to years of losses, it was finally sold by AMD. It was established after capital injection by Abu Dhabi Venture Capital Fund (ATIC), specializing in chip foundry business.However, in recent years, due to the unsmooth research and development of advanced manufacturing processes, GlobalFoundries has gradually lost in the competition with TSMC and Samsung, and its market share has declined again and again, which has directly led to the shrinkage of its revenue and profit scale, making it even more insufficient funds to invest in the arms race of the chip manufacturing process, thus forming an a vicious circle.According to Luo Guozhao, director of the China Laboratory of the CHIP Global Testing Center, although Intel has encountered difficulties in recent years, its stable financial performance is still at the level of a giant; On the other hand, although it is equally weak in cutting-edge manufacturing processes, GlobalFoundries has a stable production capacity supply above 10 nanometers and a market share of nearly 8%.In addition, the reporter noticed that in terms of macro policy, at the end of March this year, the U.S. official announced a round of US $50 billion local revitalization plan for the semiconductor industry to invest in chip manufacturing and research and development and accelerate the return of the manufacturing supply chain to the United States. Luo Guozhao said that under this policy, no company with an American background is more suitable for Intel than GlobalFoundries, and if Intel completes the acquisition and starts OEM, it will undoubtedly receive more subsidies from the US $50 billion.Ji Wei, a senior semiconductor analyst from Taiwan, also told reporters that through the acquisition of Intel, the United States can have more capital to put pressure on TSMC, thereby forcing TSMC to increase investment in the United States.All the above practical factors, Intel, which intends to complete its rise in the foundry field, and GlobalFoundries, which needs to be replenished by funds, can get each other's needs in the transaction, which may be the main reason for the acquisition scandal.\"If Intel offers a reasonable price, it's hard to say that the major shareholders in the Middle East will definitely refuse.\" Luo Guozhao said that GlobalFoundries' own will is one thing, but the decision on whether to sell is not in its hands. Therefore, the possibility of acquisition is still high, and at this stage, it will be a win-win decision for both parties.Catching up with Samsung and TSMCWith the implementation of IDM2.0 strategy, Intel's goal of catching up has become clearer and clearer. If it can successfully capture GlobalFoundries' market share, Intel will have only two rivals ahead, Samsung and TSMC.According to the reporter's understanding, although Intel's 7nm has not yet been launched, and Samsung and TSMC have announced that they will enter the 3nm process within the year, in practice, the performance of a chip depends on the number of transistors, so the lower the process technology, the more advanced it is. Because it can accommodate more transistors per unit area. Public information shows that the transistor density of TSMC's 5nm chip is about 173 million units/mm2, the transistor density of Samsung's 3nm chip is about 170 million units/mm2, and the transistor density of Intel's planned 7nm chip has reached 180 million units/mm2 millimeter.This also means that although it lags behind two generations of manufacturing processes, the gap between Intel and Samsung and TSMC in terms of technology is much smaller than expected. Once the 7nm technology matures, Intel will also have the strength to surpass Samsung and catch up with TSMC.It is particularly noteworthy that the latest financial report for the second quarter of 2021 shows that although TSMC's revenue growth has reached a new high, its profit is slightly worse than expected, and the estimated gross profit margin in the third quarter is not as expected.In contrast to the delicate situation, Kissinger also said in an interview with the media a few days ago that Intel will take two years to catch up with TSMC. However, Luo Guozhao believes that Intel will not be TSMC's opponent in the short term. After all, TSMC's 3nm process is still far ahead, and catching up in the manufacturing process is not an overnight achievement. This is why Intel chose to cooperate with TSMC.According to TSMC CEO Wei Zhejia, compared with the 5-nanometer process, the 3-nanometer process will increase transistor density by 70%, and mass production may begin in the second half of next year. Foreign media quoted sources as saying,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a>And Intel will be the main customers of this production line.In Ji Wei's view, Intel still has many problems to solve before surpassing TSMC. Even if it tries to advance the acquisition of GlobalFoundries, if we look at it from the perspective of acquisition resistance, GlobalFoundries has not been in good condition in recent years. In terms of influence, was<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SMI\">SMIC</a>With<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UMC\">UMC</a>Gradually widening the gap cannot shake TSMC. \"GlobalFoundries is still losing money at present. At this time, the acquisition will put some pressure on the financial statements. If Intel really wants to acquire GlobalFoundries, it may have sufficient reasons to convince investors to agree.\" Ji Wei said.\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n source：<a href=\"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN2021072410404779d73bc6&s=b\">中国经营报</a>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03e38a3a3c63bd5a9d8d8ca2d384d1c5","relate_stocks":{"159813":"芯片","INTC":"英特尔","03086":"华夏纳指","09086":"华夏纳指-U"},"source_url":"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN2021072410404779d73bc6&s=b","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/9a95c1376e76363c1401fee7d3717173","article_id":"2153133933","content_text":"一桩也许是近年来全球半导体业内最大的并购计划日前浮出水面。7月17日，据《华尔街日报》援引知情人士透露，英特尔正在研究以300亿美元（约合人民币1940亿元）的价格收购格罗方德（业界常简称为“格芯”），后者曾是与台积电齐名的全球芯片制造巨头，如果该笔交易成行，将成为英特尔有史以来最大的一笔收购。\n不过，传闻很快遭到格罗方德否认。7月19日，格罗方德CEO出面表示，与英特尔洽谈收购的消息只是推测而已，并否认与前者展开过收购方面的讨论，而是会继续寻求通过IPO方式实现上市。对此，《中国经营报》记者采访了英特尔中国区负责人，但对方表示对此话题不作回应。\n这一官方回应虽然迅速冷却了这笔有可能震动业界的惊天交易的舆论热度，但已有越来越多的证据显示，英特尔期冀在芯片制造领域有所作为。近日，英国《金融时报》引述英特尔官方说法证实，该公司正在计划投资200亿美元（约合人民币1296亿元）在多个欧盟成员国建造芯片工厂，目前该公司正在进行游说工作，以获得欧盟方面的支持。\n作为目前全球半导体产业中为数不多保留了芯片制造部门的龙头公司，英特尔近年来却在造芯环节开始落后于以芯片制造代工为核心业务的台积电，尤其是在先进制程方面，英特尔的7纳米工艺迟迟没有进展，台积电日前则在季度财报上宣布已通过5纳米工艺赚取了近三个季度10%的营收，同时还将在今年三季度试产3纳米工艺。\n如此差距之下，英特尔能否在收购格芯的进程中最终得手，似乎都已不影响外界对其将奋力重回芯片制造先进阵营的判断，而整个全球半导体制造领域的竞争格局，或也将以此次英特尔收购格芯传闻事件为标志，悄然进入新的态势。\n收购概率依然很高\n在英特尔近期连番动作背后，帕特·基辛格（Pat Gelsinger）被视为推动该轮决策的核心角色，他在今年2月正式接替了前任鲍勃·斯旺（Bob Swan）出任该公司的CEO。而据《华尔街日报》报道，鲍勃·斯旺出局的原因，正与其在推进先进制程方面不力导致落后主要竞争对手AMD有关。\n因此，履新不到一个月后，基辛格便高调对外宣布了英特尔的“IDM2.0”愿景。其中，IDM意指涵盖从设计到制造所有环节的半导体公司，由于芯片制造需要极高的资本投入技术研发，因此只有极少数巨头公司才有这一实力承担这一角色。在半导体制造领域，目前全球只有英特尔、三星等少数几家公司奉行IDM模式，其他则都采用台积电一类的专职代工模式。\n而在这张新绘制的IDM2.0蓝图中，代工业务也成为英特尔最重要的未来战略，基辛格在演讲中表示，英特尔计划成为美国和欧洲的主要代工产能供应商，为全球客户提供服务。为此，英特尔将投资200亿美元在亚利桑那州新建两家工厂、开设独立代工事务部门以及与第三方代工厂商进行合作。\n值得注意的是，在宣布合作名单时，基辛格直接点出了台积电、三星电子以及格罗方德的名字，而这三家企业正是占据目前全球芯片代工领域前三把交椅的主人。市场调研机构拓墣产业研究院数据显示，在全球晶圆代工领域，2019年第二季度台积电的市场份额为49.2%，紧随其后的为拥有18.0%份额的三星和8.7%的格罗方德。\n公开信息显示，格罗方德成立于2009年3月，其前身是英特尔在美国本土市场的老对手AMD的晶圆厂，因为连年亏损，最终被AMD脱手，经阿联酋阿布扎比创投基金 (ATIC) 注资后成立，专营芯片代工业务。\n但近年来，由于先进制程研发的进程并不顺利，格罗方德在与台积电、三星的竞争中逐渐败下阵来，市场份额一再下降，这也直接导致了其营收与利润规模的萎缩，使其更无足够的资金投入到芯片制程的军备竞赛上，从而形成恶性循环。\n在CHIP全球测试中心中国实验室主任罗国昭看来，英特尔虽然近年来遭遇困境，但稳定的财务表现仍是巨头级别；另一方面，虽然在尖端制程上同样乏力，但格罗方德在10纳米以上有稳定的产能供应与近8%的市场份额。\n此外，记者注意到，宏观政策上，今年3月底，美国官方公布了一轮规模达500亿美元的半导体产业本土振兴计划，用以投入芯片制造与研发，加速制造供应链重返美国。罗国昭表示，在这一政策下，没有比格罗方德这一美国背景的公司更适合英特尔，而英特尔如果完成收购并发力代工，无疑也能从500亿美元中获得更多的补贴。\n来自中国台湾的半导体资深分析师季维也向记者表示，美国透过英特尔这一收购案，能拥有更多向台积电施压的资本，以此逼迫台积电加大在美国的投资。\n以上种种现实因素，意欲在代工领域完成崛起的英特尔，以及需要资金补充的格罗方德，双方能够在交易中互取所需，这或许是收购绯闻传出的主要原因。\n“各取所需下，如果英特尔给出一个合理的价格，很难说中东的大股东就一定会拒绝。”罗国昭表示，格罗方德自身的意愿是一回事，但是否出售的决定权并不在其手中。因此，收购的可能性依然很高，而且在现阶段而言，这对双方都会是一个双赢的决定。\n赶超三星、台积电\n随着IDM2.0战略的践行，英特尔发力追赶的目标也已越来越清晰。如果能够成功吃下格罗方德的市场份额，英特尔前方将会只剩下三星与台积电两个对手。\n据记者了解，虽然目前英特尔的7纳米尚未推出，而三星、台积电均已宣布年内进军3纳米制程，但在实际中，一款芯片的性能取决于晶体管的数量，所以制程工艺越低越先进，因为单位面积内能容纳更多数量的晶体管。而公开信息显示，台积电5纳米芯片晶体管密度约为1.73亿颗/平方毫米，三星3纳米芯片晶体管密度约为1.7亿颗/平方毫米，英特尔规划中的7纳米芯片则达到了1.8亿颗/平方毫米。\n这也意味着，虽然落后两代制程，但英特尔在工艺方面与三星、台积电的差距比想象中要小得多，一旦7纳米技术成熟，英特尔也将有超越三星直追台积电的实力。\n尤其值得注意的是，最新的2021年二季度财报显示，虽然台积电营收增长再创新高，但获利略逊于预期，第三季预估的毛利率也不如预期。\n微妙的形势对比下，基辛格也在日前接受媒体采访时表示，英特尔将花两年时间赶上台积电。不过，罗国昭认为，短期内英特尔还不会是台积电的对手，毕竟台积电的3纳米工艺还是遥遥领先，而且制程方面的赶超不是朝夕之功，这也是英特尔选择与台积电合作的原因。\n据台积电CEO魏哲家此前透露，同5纳米工艺相比，3纳米工艺将使晶体管密度提升70%，并可能在明年下半年开始量产。外媒援引消息人士透露，苹果与英特尔将会是这一产线的主要客户。\n而在季维看来，在超过台积电之前，英特尔要解决的问题还有很多，即使其试图推进收购格罗方德，如果从收购阻力层面观察，格罗方德这几年的状况欠佳，在影响力上，被中芯国际与联电逐渐拉开差距，更无法撼动台积电。“格罗方德目前也还存在亏损，此时收购会在财务报表上造成一些压力，英特尔若真要收购格罗方德，可能要有充分的理由说服投资人同意。”季维表示。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"159813":0.9,"INTC":0.9,"03086":0.9,"09086":0.9}},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5323435,"gmtCreate":1627196499959,"gmtModify":1663231459836,"authorId":3574387078391491,"author":{"id":3574387078391491,"idStr":"3574387078391491","authorId":3574387078391491,"name":"zh2021","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c227b611b9691752cedc6b263256bae1","vip":1,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":174560443,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"自己上市也行","text":"自己上市也行","html":"自己上市也行"}],"langContent":"CN"}],"isCommentEnd":false,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":69,"commentSize":7,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false},"APP":{"userAgent":"Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)","isDev":false,"isTTM":true,"deviceId":"web-server-community-laohu8-v3","version":"4.35.12","shortVersion":"4.35.12","platform":"web","vendor":"web","appName":"ttm","isIOS":false,"isAndroid":false,"isTiger":false,"isTHS":false,"isWeiXin":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"isWeiBo":false,"isQQ":false,"isBaiduSwan":false,"isBaiduBox":false,"isDingTalk":false,"isToutiao":false,"isOnePlus":false,"isHuaWei":false,"isXiaomi":false,"isXiaomiWebView":false,"isOppo":false,"isVivo":false,"isSamsung":false,"isMobile":false},"href":"/m/news/2153133933","isCrawlerRequest":true}