Judge Approves Commonwealth's $5 Million Settlement With SEC in Long-Running Revenue-Sharing Dispute -- Barrons.com

Dow Jones03-25 05:36

By Kenneth Corbin

Commonwealth Financial Network will pay $5 million to resolve years-old allegations that it concealed revenue-sharing agreements that resulted in clients overpaying for pricey share classes of mutual funds when cheaper options were available. A federal judge approved the negotiated settlement between Commonwealth and the Securities and Exchange Commission on Monday, bringing the matter to an end.

The ultimate settlement is a far cry from the $93 million penalty a federal district court judge had initially imposed. An appellate court overturned that judgment a year ago, holding that a jury should have a chance to review the award, which included substantial interest and disgorgement components.

"We are pleased with this resolution and happy to put this matter behind us," says Peggy Ho, Commonwealth's general counsel and chief risk officer. Commonwealth settled the matter without admitting or denying wrongdoing.

The SEC declined to comment on the settlement.

The case, which the SEC originally brought in 2019, turned on Commonwealth's relationship with its clearing broker, a unit of Fidelity Investments. The commission said that arrangement incentivized Commonwealth advisors to steer clients into costly share classes over cheaper ones in a violation of the firm's fiduciary duty.

The case was a high-profile example of the SEC's crackdown on how firms were handling their compliance obligations amid strong financial incentives to invest clients' money in high-cost share classes. It followed a self-reporting period when the SEC invited firms to come forward and acknowledge their share-class conflicts in exchange for a lighter enforcement penalty.

In the dispute with Commonwealth, the SEC initially won a hefty disgorgement and interest judgment of $65 million and $21 million, respectively, though the appellate court questioned the fairness of those awards and the calculations used to arrive at them.

The $5 million the Commonwealth agreed to pay to finally settle the matter is off slightly from the $6.5 million civil penalty included in the original judgment.

Write to advisor.editors@barrons.com

This content was created by Barron's, which is operated by Dow Jones & Co. Barron's is published independently from Dow Jones Newswires and The Wall Street Journal.

 

(END) Dow Jones Newswires

March 24, 2026 17:36 ET (21:36 GMT)

Copyright (c) 2026 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

At the request of the copyright holder, you need to log in to view this content

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap
Leave a comment