The optimal allocation to gold in an investment portfolio depends on an investor’s goals, risk tolerance, and market outlook. There’s no one-size-fits-all answer, but here are some general guidelines based on common investment strategies:
Diversification and Risk Management: Many financial advisors suggest allocating 5-10% of a portfolio to gold as a hedge against inflation, currency depreciation, and geopolitical uncertainty. This range is often cited because it provides exposure to gold’s benefits without over-concentrating assets in a non-yielding investment.
Conservative Investors: Those with a lower risk tolerance might lean toward the higher end (around 10%) to protect against economic downturns or market volatility, as gold tends to perform well when stocks falter.
Aggressive Investors: Growth-focused investors might keep gold at 5% or less, or even avoid it entirely, since it doesn’t generate dividends or interest and could underperform during strong equity bull markets.
Tactical Allocation: Some investors adjust their gold holdings based on market conditions. For example, if inflation is rising or central banks are cutting rates (lowering real yields), gold might warrant a larger share (e.g., 15-20%). Conversely, in a high-interest-rate environment, a smaller allocation might suffice.
Historically, gold’s role is as a “safe haven” rather than a primary wealth driver. Its price can be volatile in the short term but often holds value over long periods, especially during crises. Your allocation should reflect your view on these dynamics and your overall portfolio balance (e.g., stocks, bonds, cash).
One way to get exposure to gold is to buy iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM).
Pros of IAUM:
Low Cost: IAUM has an expense ratio of 0.09%, making it one of the cheapest gold ETFs available. This is a big advantage for long-term holders, as fees eat into returns over time. For comparison, its sibling ETF, iShares Gold Trust (IAU), charges 0.25%, and the popular SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) charges 0.40%.
Direct Gold Exposure: IAUM tracks the price of physical gold (based on the LBMA Gold Price PM USD index) by holding gold bars in secure vaults. This gives you a straightforward way to invest in gold without the hassle of storage or delivery.
Accessibility: With a share price typically around $30 (as of recent data), IAUM is more affordable per share than IAU or GLD (both around $50-60), making it easier for smaller investors to buy precise amounts.
Liquidity: It trades on major exchanges with decent volume, so you can buy and sell shares easily during market hours.
Reputable Provider: Managed by BlackRock’s iShares, IAUM benefits from a trusted name in the ETF space, with transparency in its holdings and operations.
Cons of IAUM:
Limited Options Market: Unlike GLD, IAUM has a less developed options chain, which might matter if you’re an active trader looking to hedge or speculate using options.
Smaller Scale: With about $1.4 billion in assets under management (AUM), IAUM is much smaller than IAU ($41 billion) or GLD ($75 billion). While this doesn’t affect its core function, larger funds sometimes offer tighter bid-ask spreads, which can reduce trading costs.
No Income: Like all physical gold ETFs, IAUM doesn’t pay dividends or interest, so returns depend entirely on gold price appreciation.
Tax Complexity: Gold ETFs like IAUM are structured as grantor trusts, and the IRS treats them as “collectibles,” subject to a higher long-term capital gains tax rate (up to 28%) compared to stocks or bonds (up to 20%). Short-term gains are taxed as ordinary income.
Verdict:
IAUM is an excellent choice if you’re seeking a low-cost, simple way to add gold to your portfolio for diversification or as an inflation hedge. Its rock-bottom expense ratio and direct exposure to gold prices make it highly competitive, especially for buy-and-hold investors. However, if you need advanced trading features (like options) or prefer a fund with massive liquidity, you might consider GLD or IAU instead. For most retail investors with a long-term view, IAUM’s cost advantage and accessibility make it a strong contender.
Comments