Why Peter Thiel Is Right -- And What Comes Next for Those Ready to Build
Millennials didn’t turn skeptical of capitalism because they lacked ambition, discipline, or resilience. They turned skeptical because the ladder they were told to climb wasn’t just missing a few rungs -- it had been pulled away altogether, replaced by a system that demanded belief without offering any real path to ownership.
That’s not some bitter generational myth. It’s the foundational break that shaped every financial decision, every career plan, every entrepreneurial pivot made by Millennials since the GFC.
We spent nearly two decades pretending that the old economic contract still existed -- that college degrees, corporate loyalty, and careful saving could still open the doors to upward mobility -- while the cost of participation in real wealth escalated faster than hard work alone could ever bridge.
The results were predictable: record-high student debt, real wages stagnating against the tide of asset inflation, housing markets that grew inaccessible even to double-income households, and investment opportunities that rewarded incumbents while locking out new entrants before they could even begin.
Now we are waking up to the consequences, and some people are treating the response like it’s some unwarranted tantrum.
As if drowning in debt was an unavoidable rite of passage.
As if being locked out of homeownership was a failure of personal responsibility.
As if refusing to worship a system that excluded you somehow signaled weakness instead of clarity.
But this isn’t a rogue detour. It isn’t some avoidable drift that can be corrected with a few motivational speeches. It is the system operating exactly as it was restructured to operate -- and a generation realizing they were sold an outdated map to a territory that no longer exists.
And here’s where it gets even more complicated -- and more volatile. Because what we are seeing isn’t just an emotional response to difficult circumstances. It’s not simply a byproduct of political polarization or digital media echo chambers. There’s something deeper layered beneath the surface. And the signs aren’t subtle.
This isn’t cultural rebellion.
It’s strategic withdrawal.
A deliberate, widening repositioning away from legacy institutions that demand trust while hoarding access. And if you track the movements -- the explosion of freelance work, the retreat from traditional employment pipelines, the rise of decentralized finance, the collapse of loyalty to old career models -- the signal becomes clear.
It’s not capitalism that’s being rejected. It’s permissioned capitalism -- the kind where only incumbents participate meaningfully, while newcomers are asked to wait, hope, and trust.
You don’t have to believe in populism to see the throughline. Over the last decade, the tone within the Millennial and Gen Z generations has shifted -- from cautious patience to impatient construction, from playing by rules that no longer applied to building parallel ladders of their own.
Because when you take a generation that was told "work hard and you’ll earn ownership," and then systematically inflate away every accessible asset class, you do not just create frustration -- you create a break in the social contract itself.
Because if you want to break faith in a system, you don’t need a crisis. You only need time and exclusion.
And that’s exactly what happened.
This isn’t scattershot anymore.
It’s an organized, decentralized campaign of economic self-ownership, stitched together out of necessity rather than ideology.
$Robinhood(HOOD)$ portfolios.
$Airbnb, Inc.(ABNB)$ revenue streams.
$Coinbase Global, Inc.(COIN)$ wallets.
Self-taught coders and micro-entrepreneurs.
All different surfaces of the same underlying shift: a refusal to wait for legacy systems to repair themselves.
Which is why I am not cynical about what’s happening.
It’s not that I’m bearish on the future -- it’s that I know the future belongs to those willing to recognize the scaffolding of the past is already collapsing.
It’s not that I doubt the entrepreneurial energy of Millennials and Gen Z -- it’s that I see it thriving under entirely new assumptions about access, mobility, and value creation.
I didn’t inherit my position or shortcut my way around the structural rot.
I built who I am today from the ground up -- brick by brick, risk by risk, edge by edge -- navigating markets that didn’t care about my story, only about my execution.
And if there is one thing I know now, it’s this: the system isn’t going to fix itself.
And waiting for it to do so is the surest way to miss the transfer of opportunity already underway.
Capital no longer rewards patience inside broken systems. It rewards the ability to recognize when old ladders no longer lead anywhere worth climbing.
The truth is, until the barriers to ownership are meaningfully lowered -- or until the new economy achieves escape velocity -- this divergence will not slow down.
It will accelerate.
And those who continue to wait for the old system to repair itself will be left behind -- not because they lacked talent or ambition, but because they were fighting battles that no longer mattered.
The future will not be awarded through loyalty to the past. It will belong to those who are willing to build into the unknown, to bet early on what is rising rather than clinging to what is collapsing.
Because the 4th Industrial Revolution isn't coming someday -- it's already underway with early disruptors like $Palantir Technologies Inc.(PLTR)$ , $Snowflake(SNOW)$ , $CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.(CRWD)$ , $Tesla Motors(TSLA)$ , $NETLINKZ LTD(NET.AU)$ , $Axon Enterprise, Inc.(AXON)$ & $Astera Labs, Inc.(ALAB)$ .
And the ones who recognize that truth early enough to act will not just survive the transition. They will own it.
Open a CBA today and enjoy privileges of up to SGD 20,000 in trading limit with 0 commission. Trade SG, HK, US stocks as well as ETFs unlimitedly!
For whom haven't open CBA can know more from below:
Find out more here：
Comments