Singaporean Banks: Calm in the Eye of the NIM Storm

orsiri
05-04

Margin Pressure? Hardly a Crisis

It’s no secret that net interest margins (NIMs) are under pressure. Rate cuts loom, yield curves have flattened, and the golden age of interest-driven profits may be fading. Yet when I examine Singapore’s banking trio—DBS, UOB, and OCBC—the word resilient still comes to mind. These banks aren’t scrambling; they’re pivoting. And I believe investors expecting a sharp fall from grace may be underestimating their balance, diversification, and dividend discipline.

Resilience, not panic, in the face of falling margins

Let’s start with the big one: $DBS Group Holdings(D05.SI)$. Yes, its NIM is forecast to decline from 2.13% in Q4 to around 2.05% in Q1, but its loan volume and non-interest income remain strong, and its dominance in digital banking gives it a nimbleness others lack. Analysts expect net profit of S\$2.95 billion, down just 0.3% from a year ago—a remarkably steady outcome in this climate.

UOB, on the other hand, is set to post a small gain in earnings, with estimates around S\$1.6 billion, up from S\$1.56 billion. Though this is its slowest profit growth since Q2 2024, UOB’s consistent wealth management fees and ASEAN exposure provide ballast. Its NIM, forecast around 2.02%, suggests it’s weathering the squeeze slightly better than DBS.

OCBC is the one showing more visible strain. Net profit is expected at S\$1.98 billion, down 14.3% year-on-year from S\$2.31 billion, despite only a small drop in NIM—from 2.29% to 2.27%. The earnings dip seems tied more to market volatility and softer insurance income than to core banking weakness.

Dividend Reliability in Focus

While the earnings story is nuanced, the dividend story is refreshingly straightforward. DBS, UOB, and OCBC continue to pay reliable and attractive yields—ranging from 5.0% to 5.6%—without blinking. DBS leads the way with a forward yield of 5.62%, followed by UOB at 5.27%, and OCBC at 5.07%. These payouts reflect not just past performance but management’s confidence that they can sustain returns, even with thinner margins.

Their payout ratios remain disciplined—DBS at 53.6%, OCBC at 51.5%, and UOB at 48.9%—offering wiggle room even if earnings come under further pressure.

Dividend Strength and Stability: Yield vs Payout Ratio

Valuation: Still Reasonable, Still Attractive

Despite their outperformance in recent years, none of the banks look overcooked. At the time of writing:

  • DBS: P/E 10.84, PB 1.58x, ROE 17.23%, Profit margin 52.08%

  • UOB: P/E 9.86, PB 1.10x, ROE 12.57%, Profit margin 45.22%

  • OCBC: P/E 9.68, PB 1.12x, ROE 13.37%, Profit margin 55.05%

To my eye, this suggests that DBS remains the most efficient at turning capital into profits, but $ocbc bank(O39.SI)$ quietly delivers the strongest margins, while UOB looks the most modestly valued on a relative basis.

Valuation and Market Size: Are Investors Paying a Premium?

Debt-wise, DBS carries the largest load at S\$161.4 billion, which reflects its scale and intermediation role, versus UOB’s S\$54.2 billion and OCBC’s S\$48.0 billion. However, all three maintain strong capital adequacy ratios and investment-grade ratings, so there’s little alarm there.

What’s more, all three have betas well below 1—DBS at 0.55, UOB at 0.57, OCBC at 0.42—making them unusually stable for bank stocks. That’s a welcome trait for income-focused investors navigating global volatility.

A Word on Alignment

Another underappreciated angle: insider ownership. $UOB(U11.SI)$ and OCBC have significantly higher insider holdings—20.86% and 27.80%, respectively—compared to DBS’s 0.96%. While insider activity doesn’t guarantee superior returns, it does hint at management confidence and long-term alignment with shareholders—particularly in UOB’s case, still influenced by the Wee family’s stewardship.

Where ASEAN growth and digital banking boldly converge

The Broader View

Ultimately, while NIM compression may trim short-term earnings growth, I don’t see it derailing the long-term investment case. These banks remain capital-rich, conservatively managed, and well-positioned across ASEAN. Their move into fee-based income, wealth management, and digital services makes them more than just interest-rate proxies.

To me, DBS remains the most efficient machine, UOB the most balanced across ASEAN, and OCBC the most underrated on yield plus optionality.

So yes, margins may narrow. But in a global economy hungry for yield, credibility, and calm—Singapore’s banks still offer a rare combination of all three.

@TigerStars @Daily_Discussion @Tiger_comments @Tiger_SG @Tiger_Earnings @TigerClub@ @TigerWire

Maintain Guidance, Profit Drops: How Will SG Banks Move Post-Earnings?
UOB drops near 2% as it drops 2025 guidance due to US tariffs, posts stable Q1 net profit that misses estimates. It will resume giving 2025 guidance when the impact of U.S. tariffs becomes clearer. DBS Q1 net profit drops 2% to $2.9 billion, but beats bloomberg estimates; sees lower earnings for 2025; Bank to pay total dividend of 75 cents, which includes a capital return dividend of 15 cents. --------- How will their guidance affect stock trend? Who is stronger in Q1?
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

  • CornellRudolph
    05-06
    CornellRudolph
    Strong fundamentals
    • orsiri
      Absolutely! 💪📊 With balance sheets this solid, 'Strong fundamentals' might be an understatement! 😄🇸🇬🏦📈
Leave a comment
2