Is Hailey Beiber's Make Up Line More Profitable Than Justin Beiber's Music Sale?

koolgal
06-07

🌟🌟🌟The stark difference between Hailey Beiber's Make Up Line Rhode selling for a whopping USD 1 billion and her husband Justin Beiber's record sale of USD 200 million, might lead us to wonder if beauty is inherently more profitable than music.

However these 2 numbers reflect very different business models and market dynamics rather than indicating an absolute profitability ranking between beauty and music industries.

Distinct Business Models 

Rhode was built as a digitally skin first beauty brand designed to  meet modern consumer demands for streamlined multifunctional products. 

Rhode's growth was catalysed by Hailey Beiber's strong celebrity influence, saavy social media marketing and a business model that leverages direct to consumer sales with high margins and recurring purchases.

In contrast, the music industry, particularly record sales, has evolved significantly in the streaming era.  While traditional record sales once brought in substantial revenue, today a musician's earnings are spread over diverse avenues such as streaming royalties, live performances, merchandise and endorsements with record sales being only one part of a much broader ecosystem.

Market Dynamics and Valuation Multiples 

The beauty industry has enjoyed rapid global growth over the past few years.  With retail sales reaching hundreds of billions of dollars worldwide, brands such as Rhode that can capture popular consumer trends and demonstrate robust growth often command high acquisition valuations. 

Rhode 's acquisition by e.l.f. Beauty reflects not only its already proven earnings but also its strategic fit in a market that prizes digital engagement and innovation. 

In contrast valuations in the music field have to contend with the evolving revenue models amid a shift to streaming, where margins can be thinner compared to high demand, high margin cosmetics.  

Therefore the valuation applied to Rhode with a compelling digital and brand narrative will be different from that applied to recorded music assets. 

Not a Direct Comparison Across Both Industries 

While Hailey Bieber's foray into cosmetics delivered a spectacular sale, it is not necessarily a blanket indication that beauty is more profitable overall than music. 

Each industry has its unique challenges, growth opportunities and revenue streams.  For example top musicians like Justin Bieber still thrive by monetising live tours, endorsements and merchandise sales - channels that complement their recorded music revenue. 

In essence, the attractiveness of a business sale in one industry is not solely about inherent profitability but rather about the scalability, market potential and strategic timing of the sale.

Concluding Thoughts

The higher sale price for Rhode highlights how modern business models in beauty can achieve rapid, high valued growth, especially when they align with shifting consumer preferences and digital trends. 

Conversely the music industry's evolution means that record sales alone do not capture the full picture of an artist's revenue potential. 

So while Rhode's sale might make beauty look like a lucrative venture in this specific instance, the broader answer is that both industries have distinct economic engines that drive profitability in different and not directly comparable ways. 

@Tiger_comments  @Tiger_SG  @TigerStars  @CaptainTiger  @TigerClub  


High Margin Business: Is Beauty Product Your Choice?
Recently, US beauty giant e.l.f. Beauty announced its acquisition of Hailey Bieber's skincare brand, Rhode, for $1 billion. Meanwhile, Justin Bieber reportedly sold his nearly 300-song catalog to Hipgnosis Songs Capital for $200 million. After last week’s earnings, ELF jumped 23% on the day. By contrast, EstΓ©e Lauder and other traditional brands have struggled to stay relevant. Do you think Rhode is worth $1 billionβ€”or is this another overhyped celeb brand? Would you buy a product for identity and emotional value rather than function? Is the beauty industry a high-margin business?
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

  • JimmyHua
    06-09
    JimmyHua
    Interesting take! πŸ’‘ Totally agree β€” it's more about business models than the industry itself. Rhode tapped into digital-native beauty trends perfectly, while music revenue is way more spread out now. Two very different games with different rules. πŸ“Š
    • koolgal:Β 
      Best of luck πŸ€πŸ€πŸ€
    • koolgal:Β 
      May you have a winning week ahead πŸŒˆπŸŒˆπŸŒˆπŸ’°πŸ’°πŸ’°
    • koolgal:Β 
      Nonetheless both Biebers are certainly very well off.
    • koolgal:Β 
      Yes it is certainly not comparing apples to apples in this case.
    • koolgal:Β 
      Thanks for sharing your valuable insights 😍😍😍
  • icycrystal
    06-08
    icycrystal
    thanks for sharing
    • koolgal:Β 
      All the best πŸ€πŸ€πŸ€
    • koolgal:Β 
      May you have a winning week ahead πŸŒˆπŸŒˆπŸŒˆπŸ’°πŸ’°πŸ’°
    • koolgal:Β 
      Have a wonderful Sunday πŸ–οΈπŸ–οΈπŸ–οΈ
    • koolgal:Β 
      Appreciate your support πŸ₯°πŸ₯°πŸ₯°
    • koolgal:Β 
      My pleasure 😍😍😍
  • BirdieO
    06-07
    BirdieO
    Wow, fascinating
    • koolgal:Β 
      Best of luck πŸ€πŸ€πŸ€
    • koolgal:Β 
      Happy Trading πŸŒˆπŸŒˆπŸŒˆπŸ’°πŸ’°πŸ’°
    • koolgal:Β 
      Appreciate your positive feedback πŸ₯°πŸ₯°πŸ₯°
    • koolgal:Β 
      Thanks 😍😍😍
Leave a comment
17
86