U.S. Strikes Iran’s Nuclear Sites: Will Oil Hit $100 or Spark a Market Meltdown?

HMH
06-23

On June 21, 2025, President Donald Trump announced that the U.S. military executed precision strikes on three key Iranian nuclear facilities—Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan—marking a dramatic escalation in the Israel-Iran conflict. Trump hailed the operation as a “spectacular military success,” claiming Iran’s nuclear enrichment capabilities were “completely obliterated.” Iran’s Revolutionary Guard responded defiantly, vowing “serious consequences” and threatening U.S. interests across the Middle East. As Brent crude surged 2.6% to $79 per barrel by Sunday evening, investors are bracing for volatility. Could this conflict push oil prices to $80 or beyond, and might extreme scenarios trigger a broader market crisis? This article analyses the geopolitical fallout, oil market dynamics, and trading strategies for navigating the uncertainty.

The U.S. Strikes and Iran’s Response

Operation Midnight Hammer involved 125 U.S. aircraft, including seven B-2 stealth bombers, and 14 Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) bombs targeting Iran’s nuclear infrastructure. Satellite imagery from Maxar Technologies revealed significant damage at Fordow, with six craters indicating deep penetration, though Iranian officials claim the facility was evacuated and sustained no “irreversible” damage. Natanz and Isfahan, critical for uranium enrichment and nuclear research, also faced severe disruption, per Pentagon assessments.

Iran retaliated with missile strikes on Israel, killing at least 24 and intensifying regional tensions. Tehran’s parliament voted to close the Strait of Hormuz, through which 20% of global oil flows, though the decision awaits approval from the Supreme National Security Council. Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, speaking in Moscow, signalled a pause in diplomacy until Iran responds, raising fears of attacks on Gulf oil infrastructure or U.S. bases.

Oil Market Impact

Oil prices jumped 4% Sunday evening, with Brent crude reaching $80.28 and WTI at $76.73, the highest since January 2025. Analysts attribute the surge to fears of supply disruptions, given Iran’s 3.3 million barrels per day (bpd) production and the Strait of Hormuz’s strategic importance. Rapidan Energy estimates a 30% chance of Iran targeting Gulf infrastructure, which could push oil above $100 per barrel. A full Strait closure could spike prices to $120, raising U.S. gas prices by 75 cents to over $5 per gallon.

However, some factors may cap price gains. OPEC+ spare capacity of 5 million bpd could offset a 500,000 bpd loss from Iran, and China’s influence as Iran’s top oil buyer may deter a Strait closure, which U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio called “economic suicide” for Tehran. Jamie Cox of Harris Financial Group suggests Iran, stripped of nuclear leverage, may seek a peace deal, stabilizing prices after an initial spike.

Table: Oil Price Scenarios Based on Conflict Escalation

Broader Market Implications

The S&P 500 futures fell 0.6% Sunday evening, reflecting fears of inflation driven by higher oil prices. Rising inflation could reduce consumer confidence and delay Federal Reserve rate cuts, with markets pricing in a 22% chance of more than two cuts in 2025. Historically, Middle East conflicts like the 2003 Iraq invasion saw the S&P 500 dip 0.3% initially but recover 2.3% within two months, per Wedbush Securities. However, a prolonged conflict or Strait closure could trigger a global recession, especially amid Trump’s tariffs.

Cryptocurrencies like ether dropped 8.5% Sunday, signalling retail investor caution, while Gulf stock markets remained flat, assuming a benign outcome. The U.S. dollar may strengthen as a safe-haven asset, impacting emerging markets.

Trading Ideas

a) Long Oil ETFs (Entry: $United States Oil Fund LP(USO)$ ~$84, Target: $94, Stop-Loss: $79)

  • Rationale: The United States Oil Fund (USO) tracks WTI crude and could rally if Iran escalates. A 12% gain to $94 aligns with moderate disruption scenarios.

  • Probability: High, given current price momentum.

  • Risk: OPEC+ intervention or peace talks could cap gains.

b) Buy Gold Call Options (Strike: $SPDR Gold Shares(GLD)$ $320, Expiry: Dec 2025)

  • Rationale: Gold is a safe-haven asset during geopolitical turmoil. Options leverage upside while limiting risk.

  • Probability: Moderate, pending Iran’s response.

  • Risk: De-escalation could reduce safe-haven demand.

c) Short Consumer Discretionary (Entry: $Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund(XLY)$ ~$210, Target: $190, Stop-Loss: $220)

  • Rationale: Higher oil prices could curb consumer spending, pressuring XLY. A drop is feasible if gas prices rise.

  • Probability: Moderate, as inflation fears grow.

  • Risk: Strong labour market data could lift consumer stocks.

Conclusion

The U.S. strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities have thrust the Middle East into a precarious phase, with oil prices teetering above $80 and risks of a $100+ spike if Iran disrupts Gulf oil flows. While OPEC+ capacity and diplomatic efforts may mitigate supply shocks, the threat of a Strait of Hormuz closure looms large. Investors should consider oil and gold for upside potential while hedging against equity volatility. Monitoring Iran’s retaliation and Pentagon damage assessments will be critical to gauging market direction.

As always, Do Your Own Due Diligence and ensure risk management > prediction. Trade smart, stay adaptable, and don’t let emotions chase candles.

US Airstrikes = Stock Market Victory? Invest US or Israel Stocks?
On June 21, Trump announced US military had carried out precision strikes on three key Iranian nuclear facilities — Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. However, the market doesn't react too much on Monday. Some say it's a victory for stock market. How do you view market still hold a high level despite airstrikes? Problems all cleared or declines postponed?
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap
Leave a comment
4