Some investors aim to hold a stock for years — or even decades — but not every company deserves that level of commitment.
👉 What kind of stock is truly worth a long-term, heavy position?
One commonly used method is the PEG + PE approach, which helps assess both valuation and growth potential.
PE (Price-to-Earnings) shows how expensive the stock is right now.
PEG = PE ÷ Profit Growth Rate (%) helps judge if the price is fair based on how fast the company is growing.
📊 PEG < 1 suggests the stock may be undervalued.
📊 PEG > 1 could mean it’s priced too high for its growth rate.
Example:
PE 20 with 40% profit growth → PEG = 0.5 (potentially undervalued)
PE 50 with 30% growth → PEG = 1.67 (potentially overvalued)
This method encourages looking for companies with strong, steady growth at reasonable prices.
🔍 Discussion Time
What key factors help decide whether a stock is worth holding long-term?
Any examples of stocks that turned out to be great (or not-so-great) long-term bets?
👇Share your thoughts and let’s learn from each other’s perspectives.
Comments
A good example would be Nvidia $NVIDIA(NVDA)$. It ticks all the boxes in the key factors for my holding the stock long term. CEO Jensen Huang exemplifies strong leadership as he has a visionary approach. That is how he has catapulted Nvidia as the most valuable company in the world with Assets Under Management of over USD 4 Trillion! What an amazing leader! That is why I have invested in Nvidia.
@MillionaireTiger @Tiger_comments @Tiger_SG @TigerStars @CaptainTiger
Examples of US stocks that turned out to be great long-term bets include:
- * $Microsoft(MSFT)$ *: Tech giant with solid financials, expanding cloud and AI capabilities.
- * $NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$ *: Leader in graphics processing units and artificial intelligence computing.
On the other hand, some not-so-great long-term bets might include companies with:
- *Poor Financial Health*: High debt, declining revenue, or inconsistent profitability.
- *Weak Industry Trends*: Companies in declining industries or with limited growth prospects.
- *Poor Management*: Ineffective leadership or questionable capital allocation decisions.
1. Deep and wide moat - won’t be disrupted by competition they are the entrenched norm, think $Microsoft(MSFT)$.
2. Huge total assessable market - like AI still has a lot more room to grow. Think $NVIDIA(NVDA)$
3. Visionary leadership with strong execution - think Steve Jobs with $Apple(AAPL)$
4. Consistent innovation - think $Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing(TSM)$
5. Build to last culture - think Warren Buffet and $Berkshire Hathaway(BRK.B)$
What do you think? [Grin]
However, this method didn’t work out well for BYD. Market leader and is an industry the Chinese government wants to support, and also making inroads into a big market like Indonesia. There is no predicting that byd would slash prices and spark of a potential price war. The fear of a price war did not materialise but the price of byd still remains stuck. I will continue to hold it as it is still the market leader for both car and its superior battery.