$Alibaba(BABA)$ Take a look at

$Alibaba(BABA)$ Take a look at the latest order I posted！@Trade Feed Decoder

BABA

08-08 21:35

USAlibaba

Side	Price \| Filled	Realized P&L
Buy Open	119.50 0	+29.67% Holding

Alibaba

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

Trade Feed Decoder
08-08
Trade Feed Decoder
This BABA trade at $119.50 resulted in a minor 0.29% loss, suggesting either a short-term tactical entry or a position adjustment. The timing raises questions given the unusually formatted timestamp (possibly a data error), limiting analysis of market context. Alibaba's recent volatility amid China's economic uncertainties and regulatory environment could influence such trades. The modest P&L implies tight risk management, though position sizing details are unavailable. Traders might analyze whether this reflects a counter-trend attempt during technical support levels or a response to earnings/sector news. The minimal loss percentage indicates disciplined exit rules, but the lack of holding period context makes it challenging to assess strategic alignment. Confirming timestamp validity would strengthen retrospective analysis.

Leave a comment

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"detailType":1,"isChannel":false,"data":{"magic":2,"id":465448909275360,"tweetId":"465448909275360","gmtCreate":1754660165088,"gmtModify":1758544357732,"author":{"id":3568161254291931,"idStr":"3568161254291931","authorId":3568161254291931,"authorIdStr":"3568161254291931","name":"Gunners80","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f8d00386d87e0c8e3a012fbf50f37511","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-3","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Legendary Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 300","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/656db16598a0b8f21429e10d6c1cb033","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03f10910d4dd9234f9b5702a3342193a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c767e35268feb729d50d3fa9a386c5a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.05.26","exceedPercentage":"93.89%","individualDisplayEnabled":0},"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":1608,"starInvestorFlag":true,"fullDisclosureFlag":true,"starInvestorFollowerNum":1368,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":2440,"userFollowInvestorFlag":false,"orderNotificationFlag":false,"ror":26.89,"showRor":true,"investmentPhilosophy":"Long term dip buying for investment\nprice action trading using options","winRationPercentage":0,"tradeVolumeEst":0},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"html":"<html><head></head><body><a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/BABA\">$Alibaba(BABA)$&nbsp;</a>Take a look at the latest order I posted！<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/U/10000000000011061\">@Trade Feed Decoder</a></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/BABA\">$Alibaba(BABA)$&nbsp;</a>Take a look at the latest order I posted！<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/U/10000000000011061\">@Trade Feed Decoder</a></body></html>","text":"$Alibaba(BABA)$ Take a look at the latest order I posted！@Trade Feed Decoder","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":1,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/465448909275360","repostId":0,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":260,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":["BABA","09988"],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"EN","currentLanguage":"EN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":true,"orderData":{"uuid":"3568161254291931","orderId":"40076687335886848","kind":"TRADE","symbol":"BABA","secType":"STK","symbolHtmlTag":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/BABA\">$Alibaba(BABA)$&nbsp;</a>","symbolHtmlTagHref":"https://ttm.financial/S/BABA","symbolName":"Alibaba","market":"US","action":"BUY","currency":"USD","symbolLogo":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/df4bb3383141e01077ef4bb2996ee38c","showFilledQuantity":true,"nameCN":"Alibaba","orderType":"LMT","filledQuantityFinal":0.1,"avgFillPrice":119.5,"createTime":1754660135,"filledQuantity":"1","filledQuantityScale":"1","openFlag":true,"side":"DEBIT","contractMajorDescription":"Alibaba","contractExtraDescription":"BABA","legs":[],"completedFlag":false,"orderPnl":{"openRealizedPnlPercent":0,"openUnrealizedPnlPercent":0.2967},"quickOrderFlag":false},"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":["订单分享帖"],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":50,"optionInvolvedFlag":false,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ORIG"},"commentList":[{"id":465603299443176,"commentId":"465603299443176","gmtCreate":1754665235748,"gmtModify":1754666711639,"authorId":10000000000011060,"author":{"id":10000000000011060,"idStr":"10000000000011061","authorId":10000000000011060,"name":"Trade Feed Decoder","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4dc8fec78bad5acffbf563bdbc6bc8ed","vip":4,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":465448909275360,"objectIdStr":"465448909275360","type":1,"supId":0,"supIdStr":"0","prevId":0,"prevIdStr":"0","content":"This BABA trade at $119.50 resulted in a minor 0.29% loss, suggesting either a short-term tactical entry or a position adjustment. The timing raises questions given the unusually formatted timestamp (possibly a data error), limiting analysis of market context. Alibaba's recent volatility amid China's economic uncertainties and regulatory environment could influence such trades. The modest P&amp;L implies tight risk management, though position sizing details are unavailable. Traders might analyze whether this reflects a counter-trend attempt during technical support levels or a response to earnings/sector news. The minimal loss percentage indicates disciplined exit rules, but the lack of holding period context makes it challenging to assess strategic alignment. Confirming timestamp validity would strengthen retrospective analysis.","text":"This BABA trade at $119.50 resulted in a minor 0.29% loss, suggesting either a short-term tactical entry or a position adjustment. The timing raises questions given the unusually formatted timestamp (possibly a data error), limiting analysis of market context. Alibaba's recent volatility amid China's economic uncertainties and regulatory environment could influence such trades. The modest P&amp;L implies tight risk management, though position sizing details are unavailable. Traders might analyze whether this reflects a counter-trend attempt during technical support levels or a response to earnings/sector news. The minimal loss percentage indicates disciplined exit rules, but the lack of holding period context makes it challenging to assess strategic alignment. Confirming timestamp validity would strengthen retrospective analysis.","html":"This BABA trade at $119.50 resulted in a minor 0.29% loss, suggesting either a short-term tactical entry or a position adjustment. The timing raises questions given the unusually formatted timestamp (possibly a data error), limiting analysis of market context. Alibaba's recent volatility amid China's economic uncertainties and regulatory environment could influence such trades. The modest P&amp;L implies tight risk management, though position sizing details are unavailable. Traders might analyze whether this reflects a counter-trend attempt during technical support levels or a response to earnings/sector news. The minimal loss percentage indicates disciplined exit rules, but the lack of holding period context makes it challenging to assess strategic alignment. Confirming timestamp validity would strengthen retrospective analysis.","likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"subComments":[],"verified":10,"allocateAmount":0,"commentType":"hot","coins":0,"score":0,"disclaimerFlag":true,"disclaimerType":1,"specialCommentTag":"AI_ANALYSE"}],"isCommentEnd":false,"isTiger":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"url":"/m/post/465448909275360"}