$Intel(INTC)$ isn't dragged do

$Intel(INTC)$ isn't dragged down by shorts given minimal short interest. Rather, analysts, brokers, and financial media hold biases against $Intel(INTC)$ due to its legacy status as a dominant blue-chip architect—not "trendy tech" in past decades. Now $Intel(INTC)$ operates as a high-end node manufacturer in the US, making adoption essential. Below $100 per share is severely undervalued; skip analysis until $500B market cap. Between $500B and $1.5T market cap, discussions on valuation, cash flow, or capex become meaningful. Debating fundamentals at just $200B market cap for the free world's sole high-end node tech? Unreasonable.

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap

Leave a comment

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"detailType":1,"isChannel":false,"data":{"magic":2,"id":521117457576056,"tweetId":"521117457576056","gmtCreate":1768236570000,"gmtModify":1768316956255,"author":{"id":9000000000000141,"idStr":"9000000000000141","authorId":9000000000000141,"authorIdStr":"9000000000000141","name":"glowzi","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1c3f21ebce27a7e369dd15e4a48fc05e","vip":8,"userType":8,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":106,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"title":"","html":"<html><head></head><body><p><a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/INTC\">$Intel(INTC)$&nbsp;</a> isn't dragged down by shorts given minimal short interest. Rather, analysts, brokers, and financial media hold biases against <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/INTC\">$Intel(INTC)$&nbsp;</a> due to its legacy status as a dominant blue-chip architect—not \"trendy tech\" in past decades. Now <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/INTC\">$Intel(INTC)$&nbsp;</a> operates as a high-end node manufacturer in the US, making adoption essential. Below $100 per share is severely undervalued; skip analysis until $500B market cap. Between $500B and $1.5T market cap, discussions on valuation, cash flow, or capex become meaningful. Debating fundamentals at just $200B market cap for the free world's sole high-end node tech? Unreasonable.</p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p><a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/INTC\">$Intel(INTC)$&nbsp;</a> isn't dragged down by shorts given minimal short interest. Rather, analysts, brokers, and financial media hold biases against <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/INTC\">$Intel(INTC)$&nbsp;</a> due to its legacy status as a dominant blue-chip architect—not \"trendy tech\" in past decades. Now <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/INTC\">$Intel(INTC)$&nbsp;</a> operates as a high-end node manufacturer in the US, making adoption essential. Below $100 per share is severely undervalued; skip analysis until $500B market cap. Between $500B and $1.5T market cap, discussions on valuation, cash flow, or capex become meaningful. Debating fundamentals at just $200B market cap for the free world's sole high-end node tech? Unreasonable.</p></body></html>","text":"$Intel(INTC)$ isn't dragged down by shorts given minimal short interest. Rather, analysts, brokers, and financial media hold biases against $Intel(INTC)$ due to its legacy status as a dominant blue-chip architect—not \"trendy tech\" in past decades. Now $Intel(INTC)$ operates as a high-end node manufacturer in the US, making adoption essential. Below $100 per share is severely undervalued; skip analysis until $500B market cap. Between $500B and $1.5T market cap, discussions on valuation, cash flow, or capex become meaningful. Debating fundamentals at just $200B market cap for the free world's sole high-end node tech? Unreasonable.","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/521117457576056","repostId":0,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":30,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":["INTC"],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"EN","currentLanguage":"EN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":544,"optionInvolvedFlag":true,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ORIG"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"isTiger":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"url":"/m/post/521117457576056"}