zhingle
02-03 21:43

🐯 Citi Lifts SanDisk to $750 — Why the AI Storage Trade Is Still Early 🚀💾

The market is starting to realize something important:

AI is not just a compute story — it’s a storage supercycle.

On Monday, Citigroup raised SanDisk’s target price from $490 to $750, highlighting:

• +64% QoQ data-center revenue growth

• Margin resilience despite past NAND cyclicality

• Accelerating hyperscaler demand tied directly to AI workloads

The result:

• SanDisk +15.4%

• Micron +5.5%

• Western Digital +6.1%

This move isn’t the end of the trade — it’s the recognition phase.

1️⃣ AI Is Creating a Structural (Not Cyclical) Storage Shift 🤖📈

Every AI model requires:

• Massive training datasets

• Continuous high-speed inference access

• Frequent data refresh and replacement

This changes storage economics:

• Higher endurance SSDs

• Faster replacement cycles

• More enterprise-grade mix → better margins

Unlike past NAND upcycles driven by PCs or smartphones, AI demand is capex-backed, long-duration, and non-discretionary.

📌 Storage has become mission-critical infrastructure, not a commodity.

2️⃣ SanDisk Is the Cleanest AI-Storage Pure Play 🎯💾

Post-spinoff, SanDisk offers:

• Direct exposure to NAND & SSD pricing

• Higher operating leverage to AI demand

• Minimal distraction from non-core segments

That +64% QoQ data-center revenue jump matters — it signals:

• Hyperscalers are scaling AI workloads

• AI storage is moving from testing to production

• Revenue visibility is improving

This is exactly the kind of inflection that drives multi-quarter earnings upgrades.

3️⃣ Valuation Is Expanding — But Fundamentals Are Catching Up 💰📊

Yes, the stock has rerated — but so has the earnings outlook.

Key tailwinds:

• NAND supply discipline across the industry

• Pricing stabilization after years of oversupply

• Margin expansion driven by data-center mix

As AI workloads grow, storage spend scales with data, not model hype — making it more durable than some compute demand.

📈 The market is still under-allocated to AI storage relative to GPUs and servers.

4️⃣ “Crowded Trade” Is the Wrong Framing 🚫📉

A trade isn’t crowded when:

• Earnings estimates are still moving up

• Institutional positioning is still light

• The narrative is just turning constructive

This looks more like early institutional catch-up, not late-cycle euphoria.

⚠️ Volatility will happen — but pullbacks are likely buyable, not trend-breaking.

🧠 Bottom Line: This Is Not the Top — It’s the Rerating Phase

SanDisk is benefiting from:

✔️ Structural AI data growth

✔️ Hyperscaler scaling, not pausing

✔️ A cleaner, higher-torque business model

The Citi upgrade isn’t calling the top — it’s acknowledging that AI storage demand is real, visible, and accelerating.

💡 AI needs GPUs to think — but it needs storage to remember.

And memory demand is only getting bigger.

📊 Bullish bias: Buy on dips, not fade the trend.

SNDK -12%, MU -9%: Storage Trade Ending?
The tech selloff that began in software is now spilling into AI hardware, with storage stocks facing a sharp crowded-trade unwind. As risk appetite faded, high-beta leaders saw heavy profit-taking: SanDisk fell 12%, Western Digital nearly 11%, Micron Technology over 9%, and Seagate Technology about 7%. With six-month gains exceeding 1,100% for SanDisk and bullish targets piling up, expectations were stretched. This looks less like a fundamentals break—and more like a valuation reset after extreme optimism. Is this a healthy shakeout—or the start of a deeper de-rating for AI storage stocks?
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap
Leave a comment
3