L.Lim
03-03
I believe it will go on a little while simply because the us president does not seem to have a solid plan.
While it is simple to say that the war seeks to force a regime change, it is worth taking into account the view that the bombardment and air superiority can only achieve so much on the ground.

In the medium to long term, the idea of low(er) cost weapons, specifically one way attack drones, should become a priority for every nation's military force. Extrapolation would therefore mean that whoever comes up with a good and economical counter (not costly systems firing off missiles that cost millions of dollars) measure would rake in the money too.

Oil at 52-Week High: Can Trump Stop the March to $100?
U.S. crude oil futures (WTI) ignited on Thursday, surging 8.5% to settle near $81 per barrel, its highest level since July 2024. This spike comes as investors price in a "long-war" scenario in the Middle East, with Brent crude also breaking above the $85 mark. The market is currently grappling with a "Strait of Hormuz premium," as prediction-market odds of a closure hit an all-time high of 86%. Would supply squeeze push crude above $100? Or will a potential SPR release force a "gap fill" back toward $73?
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap
Leave a comment