$CTEV Explodes 17% as Short Squeeze Drives Test of $17.79
$Claritev Corporation(CTEV)$ Claritev Corporation(CTEV) Soared +17.19%: Short Squeeze Ignites, Eyes on $17.79 High Latest Close Data: On 2026-03-03, CTEV closed at $16.91, surging +17.19% (+$2.48). It is now -77.2% from its 52-week high of $74.07. Core Market Drivers: The dramatic intraday rally (+23.56% amplitude) appears driven by a potential short squeeze, as the stock price has broken above a key resistance level. The recent 5-day capital flow data shows consistent net inflows, suggesting renewed buying interest. Technical Analysis: Volume surged to 605.5K shares, a significant increase supporting the bullish move. The 6-day RSI jumped to 45.03, moving sharply out of the oversold territory (<30). MACD histogram turned less negative (-0.59),
Testing the Ceiling Again, $LVWR Faces Key Level at $1.66
$LiveWire(LVWR)$ LiveWire (LVWR) Gains +4.61%: Testing Resistance Near $1.66, Consolidation Continues Latest Close Data LiveWire closed at $1.59 on March 3, 2026, up 4.61% for the day. The stock remains significantly below its 52-week high of $9.04. Core Market Drivers The stock's modest uptick appears to be a technical bounce within its established low-price range. No major company-specific news was reported, suggesting the move was driven by general market sentiment or low-volume trading. The high concentration of ownership (Harley-Davidson holds ~89%) continues to limit float and liquidity. Technical Analysis Volume was light at 132k shares (Volume Ratio: 0.26), indicating a lack of strong conviction. The RSI(6) at 38.3 remains in neutral terri
$BCO Stabilizes With Buyers Returning, $136 Back in Play
$Brink's(BCO)$ Brink's (BCO) Consolidates Near $126: Bullish Divergence Emerges, Aims for $130+ Latest Close Data: BCO closed at $125.83 on Mar 3 (NY), essentially flat (-0.02%) from the previous close. It is now about 7.7% below its 52-week high of $136.37. Core Market Drivers: The stock is consolidating after a volatile week. Strong institutional ownership (BlackRock, Vanguard, FMR) provides stability, while recent capital flow data shows a significant net inflow on Mar 2, suggesting renewed buying interest. Technical Analysis: Volume was below average (Volume Ratio: 0.69), indicating consolidation. The MACD (-1.86) remains negative but its histogram is showing signs of slowing bearish momentum (DIF: 0.25, DEA: 1.18). The 12-day RSI at 47.7 is in
Why I Bought Prudential at 97.55 — Technical Support, Income Stability, and a 5% Dividend Engine
I initiated my position in Prudential plc (PRU) at 97.55 based on a combination of technical analysis and dividend fundamentals. This was not an emotional entry. It was a calculated decision supported by price structure, risk-reward positioning, and consistent income generation. At around this level, PRU presents an interesting blend of value, income, and potential recovery upside. Technical Analysis: Buying Near Support, Not at Euphoria From the daily chart, PRU has retraced significantly from its recent high near 119.76. That peak marked the exhaustion phase of the prior upward wave. After that, price rolled over in a structured correction, forming lower highs and lower lows. However, around the 96 to 100 region, we see something important. This zone has previously acted as support. Pric
War Escalation, Oil Shock and AI Divergence—Are Global Assets Entering a New Uncertainty Regime?
Source: DBS Chief Investment Office, Market Pulse Publication Date: 2 March 2026 This article is based on and adapted from the original report. Hi, Tigers~👋 How’s everyone navigating this week’s volatility? Have you managed to capture any excess returns during the swings — or has risk control been the bigger win? Over the past week, the pricing logic of global risk assets has shifted noticeably. The sudden escalation of U.S.–Iran tensions, the risk of an oil supply shock, a potential rebound in inflation expectations, and growing divergence within the AI theme have converged at once. With multiple variables interacting simultaneously, markets are entering a phase characterized less by clear direction and more by rising volatility. So today, let’s break this down together. In this edition,
$Target(TGT)$ Target Corp. (TGT) Soared +6.74%: Retail Giant Breaks Key Resistance, Eyeing $122-$127 Zone Latest Close Data TGT closed at $120.80 on 2026-03-03, surging +6.74% (+$7.63). The stock is now just $6.26 (4.9%) below its 52-week high of $127.06. Core Market Drivers The significant rally appears to be driven by strong net capital inflow ($98M), a notable reversal after several days of outflows. The 3.73% dividend yield continues to attract income-focused investors. No specific news was highlighted in the provided data. Technical Analysis The move was supported by high volume (2.79x average Volume Ratio) and a strong technical rebound. The 6-day RSI jumped to 71.94, approaching overbought territory, signaling strong short-term momentum. How
Key names are at critical junctures. $SPY teeters on a daily head-and-shoulders, $MU looks expensive in the short term, $JD highlights the importance of cutting losses, and $HOOD remains in a bearish cycle despite potential relief rallies. 1. $SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust(SPY)$ Liquidity is hanging on for dear life. And $SPY is building a daily head and shoulders. If that neckline breaks, things could get ugly fast. 2. $Micron Technology(MU)$ I hope I’m wrong, but I don’t think now is the time to buy $MU. Yes, trend is bullish and buyers are still in control. But short term, you’re paying an extreme premium. My ideal play is a 20% pullback, then looking to buy the dip. 3. $
$HOOD & $NOW Bearish, $MSFT at Key Support, $RIVN Coiling in Buy Zone
Several major names are at pivotal levels. $HOOD and $NOW remain in bearish cycles despite bounce potential, $MSFT is reacting off major long-term support, and $RIVN continues compressing inside a developing buy range. 1. $Robinhood(HOOD)$ HOOD is still in a Bear Cycle in my system. Monthly BX is dark red, so trend stays down, but a relief rally into the $60 area is possible. Monthly Bias is often a strong support zone, but I’m still on the sidelines. I only buy when there is real pressure in the market, not on “discount” alone. 2. $ServiceNow(NOW)$ NOW is building a solid base and a move back toward $140–$150 is possible. I am not buying yet ❌ My system is still bearish: Monthly BX is dark red and sellers
$AAPL & $AMD Test Support, $PLTR Trap Risk, $PLUG Diverges
Mixed signals across the board. $PLUG is pushing higher against market weakness, while $AAPL and $AMD sit at critical support with Monthly BX still green. Meanwhile, $PLTR’s bounce may be short-lived as broader signals remain bearish. 1. $Plug Power(PLUG)$ In a sea of red, $PLUG is pushing up stream 2. $Apple(AAPL)$ AAPL doing everything it can to stay bullish. Trend is still green and the Monthly BX is holding green. Both point to a potential bounce. If this support gives way and MBX flips, I am looking for a 10% to 12% correction. 3. $Advanced Micro Devices(AMD)$ AMD clinging to support with the Monthly BX still green. We’re at a critical make-or-break level. Fo
Momentum shift in $WDAY with buyers targeting $150–$155 next
$Workday(WDAY)$ Workday, Inc.(WDAY) Jumps +7.16%: Strong Rebound from Support, Eyes on $150 Latest Close Data Closed at $143.61 on Mar 3, up +7.16% ($+9.60). This marks a significant recovery, now trading 48% below its 52-week high of $276.00. Core Market Drivers The stock rebounded strongly from its recent support level. The positive price action coincides with a notable shift in capital flow, turning net positive on the last trading day after a series of outflows, indicating renewed buying interest. Technical Analysis The rally was supported by solid volume (6.86M shares, Volume Ratio 0.59). The MACD histogram turned positive to 3.46, signaling strengthening bullish momentum. The 6-day RSI jumped to 58.97, moving out of oversold territory and su
$Z recovery attempt builds momentum with $48–$50 upside
$Zillow(Z)$ Zillow Group, Inc. (Z) Rallies +3.88%: Rebound from 52-Week Low, Eyes $46 Breakout Latest Close Data Zillow closed at $45.23 on 2026-03-03, up +3.88% (+$1.69). The stock remains ~51.8% below its 52-week high of $93.88. Core Market Drivers The rally appears to be a technical rebound from oversold conditions near its 52-week low. No specific company news was reported, but the broader real estate tech sector may be finding support amid stabilizing interest rate expectations. Technical Analysis Volume was elevated at 5.74M shares (Volume Ratio: 1.14), confirming the move. The 6-day RSI at 46.12 is recovering from oversold territory (<30). Most notably, the MACD histogram turned positive (+1.00), signaling a potential bullish momentum shift
The Compute Iron Curtain: Who Controls Physical Access to Power?
The End of Cloud Globalization: Compute Becomes Strategic TerritoryIn Q1 2026, the world formally entered the era of Compute Mercantilism.Cloud computing was built on two assumptions:Cross-border data would remain frictionless.Core compute supply would remain politically neutral.Both assumptions have collapsed.Over the past two years, governments have internalized three hard truths:Data can be subject to extraterritorial regulation.GPUs can be restricted overnight.Cloud services can be cut off with a policy switch.The result is not market adjustment. It is state intervention.Compute is no longer an IT resource. It has been absorbed into national security doctrine.Sovereign AI clouds are becoming standard architecture:Mandatory data residencyPhysically isolated GPU clustersDomestic operatio
VIX Surges, Markets Plunge! Can S&P 500 Safeguard 6800?
$S&P 500(.SPX)$ fell as much as 2.5% intraday, $Dow Jones(.DJI)$ once dropped nearly 1,300 points, small caps slid close to 1.8%, and $NASDAQ(.IXIC)$ led the declines among the three major indexes. $Cboe Volatility Index(VIX)$ spiked sharply, hitting its highest level since April 2025 during the session, signaling a clear rise in risk-off sentiment. The Fear & Greed Index has entered the “Fear” zone. 1. “Negative Gamma” trap could accelerate the selloff? $S&P 500(.SPX)$ closed at 6816, the critical point. From both technical and options-chain perspectives, 6,800 is m
Based on a comparative analysis of valuation, financial health, and near-term catalysts, Microsoft (MSFT) presents a more balanced risk-reward profile for a "buy the dip" strategy in early March 2026, while Nvidia (NVDA) offers higher growth potential paired with greater volatility and execution risk. The current pullback has improved valuations for both, but their investment theses differ significantly. 1. Comparative Analysis: Nvidia (NVDA) vs. Microsoft (MSFT) Metric Nvidia (NVDA) Microsoft (MSFT) Analysis Current Price ~$180.05 ~$403.93 As of March 4, 2026. Forward P/E 22.26 24.03 Both are near 5-year lows. NVDA's is below its historical avg (40.82); MSFT's is below its avg (32.02). NVDA appears statistically cheaper. P/E (TTM) 36.75 25.28 MSFT has a lower trailing earnings multiple. P
$AI rebounds +5.2% from support, testing $9.30 breakout zone
$C3.ai, Inc.(AI)$ C3.ai, Inc.(AI) Rallied +5.20%: Bouncing from Key Support, Testing $9.3 Zone Latest Close Data Closed at $9.10, up +5.20%. Remains significantly below its 52-week high of $30.24. Core Market Drivers: The stock found support after recent declines, with positive net capital inflow for the day. The broader AI sector sentiment remains a key macro driver, though no specific company news was highlighted in the provided data. Technical Analysis: The 6-day RSI at 42.6 is recovering from oversold territory (below 30 earlier this week), suggesting weakening selling pressure. However, MACD remains in negative territory (DIF: -0.97, DEA: -0.87), indicating the overall trend is still bearish. Volume of 9.67M shares shows active participation in
War in the Middle East Intensifies, but Gold Sells Off — Why?
After falling more than 4.38% in the previous session and briefly dropping below the $5,000 mark intraday, gold has rebounded today to around $5,169, recovering part of the losses from the prior trading day. The sharp drop and subsequent rebound in gold prices over the past two days have also quickly transmitted to related ETFs. On March 3, the physically backed gold ETFs $黄金ETF-SPDR(GLD)$ and $黄金信托ETF-iShares(IAU)$ fell 4.46% and 4.44% respectively in a single session. Gold mining equity ETFs saw even larger declines, with $黄金矿业ETF-VanEck(GDX)$ dropping 8.76% and $小型黄金矿业ETF(Market Vectors)(GDXJ)$ falling 8.91%. Volatility
The short-term Elliott Wave structure in EURJPY continues to indicate a bullish trend. Examination of the 45‑minute chart reveals that the pullback from the wave ((iii)) high unfolded in three distinct waves. This formation suggests a corrective nature rather than the beginning of a larger reversal. Thereby, it supports the expectations of further upside momentum. The rally from the February 13 low is proposed to develop as a five‑wave impulse. From the February 13 low, wave ((i)) concluded at 182.27, followed by a retracement in wave ((ii)) that ended at 180.80. The pair then advanced in wave ((iii)), which itself unfolded as an impulse of a lesser degree. Within this sequence, wave (i) terminated at 183.15, while the corrective wave (ii) ended at 181.98. Subsequent strength carried wave
The EURJPY pair was on a higher high/higher low sequence in February 2026 so the obvious was to only look for buy opportunities. February 24 2026 the pair formed a bullish divergence pattern (Red) in the FVG top level (Blue line) then pushed higher and broke above the shift level (Black line) signalling that the pair was gearing up to rally higher again. I posted on February 24 2026 the buy/long trade chart below on social media @AidanFX and also posted the entry, stop loss and targets. “Bought at 183.52 with stop loss at 183.20 and minimum target at 2R 184.16 and maximum target at 3R 184.48.” EURJPY 15 Minute Chart February 24 2026 (Entry) EURJPY, trading, elliottwave, bullish market patterns, forex, @AidanFX, AidanFX EURJPY 15 Minute Chart February 25 2026 (Targets HIT) EURJPY, trading,
Strait of Hormuz A blockade threat at the Strait of Hormuz is not merely symbolic. It touches roughly one fifth of global oil flows. The market is therefore pricing a geopolitical premium, not just fundamentals. Could crude break US$100? Yes, but three conditions must align: 1. Physical disruption, not just rhetoric If tankers are actually halted, or insurers withdraw coverage, effective supply tightens immediately. 2. Insurance and freight spike Even without full closure, sharply higher risk premiums reduce available cargoes. 3. Limited OPEC spare capacity response If Saudi and UAE spare capacity is slow to offset losses, the squeeze intensifies. Under a true disruption scenario, Brent above US$100 is plausible. However, markets tend to overshoot first, then mean revert once alternative r