Hey Tiger, hope you're all doing well. If you've been holding Uber shares for a while, they haven't performed particularly well. Over the past five years, the stock is up 400%, but over the last year, it's down about 6%. That's not great for a company people invest in for growth, especially when many other stocks have significantly outperformed Uber over the same period. The company recently announced its Q4 earnings, which many investors are focusing on—much like how BlackBerry investors in 2007 or 2008 were still watching earnings reports after the iPhone had already disrupted the market. While things initially looked stable for BlackBerry and Nokia, their business models had already been irreversibly damaged. Uber is in a similarly fragile position, and today, I’ll show you why.
Uber shareholders buying up shares today is like investing in BlackBerry before the iPhone or Blockbuster before Netflix. If you're thinking about buying Uber stock on the dip, you need to read this articles and understand the company's business model. In today's articles, I’ll explain why so many Uber investors don't fully grasp the company's moat and how it's on the verge of being disrupted—just like BlackBerry and Blockbuster before it. If you decide to buy Uber stock despite this warning, I won’t feel sorry for you because you've been fairly warned.
Many believe Uber is a cash-generating machine with a strong business model, but a closer look at its financials tells a different story. Reading through the company's latest earnings call, you can sense the panic—executives understand what’s coming but avoid discussing it openly because they don’t want the average investor to catch on.
Many Youtuber had shouting to buy uber stock since start of the year 2025, it's important to take a step back and analyze their reasoning. Are they making their case based on strong financial fundamentals, long-term growth potential, or just short-term hype?
Uber’s business model is relatively Fragile:
Uber operates a two-sided marketplace—it needs both drivers and riders. If driver supply shrinks (due to high costs, better alternatives, or dissatisfaction), the whole system weakens. More importantly, autonomous vehicles could completely upend Uber’s need for drivers, turning it into a one-sided market, which makes it much easier for competitors like Tesla and Google to enter the space. Drivers require financial incentives to continue working for Uber, and if they leave, riders will too. This balance between supply and demand is Uber’s moat, similar to how social media platforms need both content creators and an engaged audience to sustain their business.
However, the rise of autonomous vehicles will completely dismantle this two-way marketplace. Unlike human drivers, autonomous cars don’t require financial incentives to operate. This means the market shifts from a two-way model to a one-way model, where companies only need to attract riders. This shift makes it much easier for competitors—especially deep-pocketed tech giants like Google and Tesla—to enter the space and disrupt Uber’s business.
Uber currently benefits from having both drivers and riders locked into its platform, making it difficult for competitors to lure away both at the same time. But in a world of autonomous vehicles, competitors only need to attract riders—something Google and Tesla, with their massive user bases and technological advantages, can do effortlessly. Tesla, for example, has a history of eliminating middlemen in its business model, from car dealerships to charging infrastructure. Does anyone really think Tesla will suddenly decide to let Uber take a cut of its autonomous vehicle revenue? Similarly, Google, sitting on billions in cash and dominating online advertising, has the resources to create its own autonomous ride-hailing service without Uber’s involvement.
Uber’s Growth Is Slowing
While Uber has been growing, its revenue growth is in the 18–21% range, which is decent but not explosive for a company valued at nearly $150 billion. Many other tech stocks have outperformed it, so the idea that Uber is a "must-buy" isn’t necessarily true.
The Middleman Problem
Uber’s long-term risk is that it doesn’t own the cars or the technology behind self-driving vehicles. Tesla and Waymo (Google) are leading in autonomy, and they have no reason to let Uber take a cut of their business. History has shown that when tech giants no longer need a middleman, they cut them out—just like Apple did with Intel.
Financials Aren’t as Strong as They Seem
Yes, Uber has positive free cash flow, but it still carries $8 billion in long-term debt, and its profit margins are thin. At its current valuation, it assumes continued dominance, but that’s far from guaranteed.
While Uber’s financials currently appear solid—growing revenue at around 18–21%—its long-term viability is in question. The company’s balance sheet isn’t particularly strong, with $6 billion in cash and $8 billion in long-term debt. More importantly, its business model still depends on paying drivers, which will become an obsolete expense once autonomous vehicles take over.
Despite generating $7 billion in operating cash flow last year, Uber's valuation of nearly $150 billion is built on the assumption that its moat will remain intact indefinitely. That’s the same flawed thinking that led investors to believe BlackBerry and Blockbuster were safe. Investors bullish on Uber aren’t considering the fundamental shift that’s coming.
Over-hyped by Influencers?
Many YouTubers and influencers push stocks for clicks and engagement, often without deep analysis. Ask yourself: Are they considering the risks? Or are they just riding a trend?
The real risk is that once companies like Google and Tesla establish scale with autonomous ride-hailing, they will no longer need Uber as a middleman—just as Apple eventually stopped relying on Intel for its processors. Time and again, we’ve seen tech giants partner with companies in the early stages of a new industry, only to cut them out once they achieve self-sufficiency.
Conclusion
Uber might still perform well in the short term, but long-term investors should be cautious. If self-driving tech truly takes off, Uber’s competitive advantage could vanish, making it the next BlackBerry or Blockbuster. In the short term, Uber’s stock may fluctuate, but in the long run, its business model is at serious risk. Once its moat disappears, Uber could go the way of Blockbuster and BlackBerry.
Hope you found this Article insightful—good luck with your investments!
Disclaimer: I want to make it clear that I am not a financial advisor, and nothing I say is intended to be a recommendation to buy or sell any financial instrument. Additionally, it's important to remember that there are no guarantees or certainties in trading or investing, and you should never invest money that you can't afford to lose.
@Daily_Discussion @TigerPM @TigerObserver @Tiger_comments @TigerClub
Comments