AppLovin’s AI Empire Under Fire: Is the 20% Stock Plunge a Dip Worth Buying?

Bullaroo
02-27

On Wednesday, February 26, 2025, AppLovin Corporation ( $AppLovin Corporation(APP)$ ), a titan in AI-driven mobile advertising, delivered a stellar Q4 2024 earnings report—$1.37 billion in revenue (up 44%) and $1.73 EPS, smashing estimates of $1.26 billion and $1.25. Yet, the glow was short-lived. Short-seller reports from Fuzzy Panda Research and Culper Research dropped the same day, accusing AppLovin’s AXON 2.0 algorithm of unethical and potentially illegal practices, including data theft from Meta and violations of Apple and Google app store policies. The fallout? A 12% drop to $355 by Wednesday’s close, followed by a further 15% slide to ~$300-$310 in after-hours trading on Thursday, February 27—an 18%-20% two-day rout from $375 pre-earnings, and 40% off its $525 peak. After seven straight declines since mid-February, is this a golden dip or a trap for retail investors? Let’s break it down.

Stock Price Performance: From Triumph to Turmoil

AppLovin’s 2024 was a rocket ride—up 780% from $39 to $345 by year-end, hitting $525 earlier this month on AXON’s e-commerce push. Q4’s $1.37 billion (73% software revenue growth) and $848 million EBITDA (up 78%) reinforced its AI ad tech dominance, with a $1.36-$1.39 billion Q1 2025 guide beating $1.3 billion forecasts. But the short reports flipped the script: Wednesday’s 12% tumble slashed $17 billion in market cap, and Thursday’s 15% after-hours dive to ~$300-$310—pending real-time confirmation—marks a 27% two-day loss from $410 highs. Seven consecutive declines signal momentum gone sour, yet the fundamentals remain intact.

The severity of Short Reports: Noise or Nuke?

Fuzzy Panda labels AXON 2.0 a “House of Cards,” alleging data theft from Meta’s ad pool, “backdoor” app installs via deceptive UX, and kid-targeted ads risking app store bans. Culper echoes this, claiming APP “force-feeds” installs and hypes AXON as a promotional sham, tying CEO Adam Foroughi’s Gator spyware past to credibility woes. Evidence? Thin—ex-employee quotes, gameplay clips of unclickable ads, and e-commerce client whispers. No lawsuits, regulatory filings, or platform rebukes back it up. Severity hinges on fallout: if Apple or Google act (e.g., SDK bans for policy breaches), it’s catastrophic—73% of Q4’s growth is software-driven. Without proof, it’s loud speculation from shorts profiting off panic (Fuzzy Panda’s short confirmed, Culper implied). Serious as a sentiment hit; unproven as a business killer.

Market Reaction: Overblown or On Point?

The market’s response—12% down to $355, then 15% more to ~$300-$310—slashes APP’s market cap by $30-$40 billion from $525 highs. Reasonable? Yes and no. The 27% two-day crater outpaces the reports’ substance—options priced an 8% swing (±$11 from ~$140 pre-drop), not 27%. APP’s beat ($1.37B vs. $1.26B, $1.73 vs. $1.25) and $1.36-$1.39B Q1 guide argue for a softer hit; a 700%+ yearly gain invites profit-taking, but this feels like panic. It’s rational as a knee-jerk to unproven fraud claims on a hyped stock—APP’s valuation (30x revenue, per Nasdaq) screams overreach, and shorts smell blood. But it’s excessive without concrete fallout (bans, suits). Compare Hindenburg’s 2022 Adani hit—30%+ drops on documented debt issues—or Muddy Waters’ Luckin Coffee fraud (80% crash, proven). APP’s drop is big, but not yet backed by that level of substantiation.

Prediction: Where’s the Stock Headed?

Near-term, selling’s got legs—after-hours runs and Friday’s open (1:00 AM AEDT) face volume. Short interest spiked pre-reports; more could pile on, pushing $250-$280 if Fuzzy Panda doubles down or news lags. But $290-$300 support and $1.2B buyback muscle suggest a floor. If platforms stay silent and earnings shine, a rebound to $350-$400 by mid-March isn’t wild—shorts often cover fast without ammo (Bear Cave’s 9% faded). Long-term, $450-$500 looms if trust holds; sub-$225 if regulators bite. Friday’s key—light buying, it’s a base; heavy dump, it’s a slide.

Wall Street’s Defense: Vested Interests Aside

Big firms—Wedbush (“overblown,” $620 target), Loop Capital ($650), BofA ($580)—rallied for APP, arguing no lawsuits or bans prove fraud. They’ve got skin in the game: long positions, client stakes in a $100B+ cap stock, and fees from buybacks or offerings. Their 14/18 “Buy” consensus (TipRanks) props APP, but profit motives muddy the purity—set that aside. The reports stand on their merit or lack thereof.

Retail Investor Strategy: Dip or Dodge?

  • The Opportunity Case

This dip could be a screaming buy if you believe the short-seller storm is overblown. APP’s fundamentals are rock-solid: revenue up 44% year-over-year, software platform (AXON) soaring 73% to nearly $1B, and net income tripling to $1.58B in 2024. The $848M EBITDA (78% growth) and $1.2B free cash flow back a $2.1B buyback, showing financial muscle. The Q1 outlook beats the $1.3B consensus, and analysts—14/18 “Buy” with a $542 average target—see upside to $400-$500, a 30%-60% jump from $300-$310. The short reports allege “deceptive ads,” “data theft from Meta,” and “backdoor installs,” but there’s no hard evidence yet—no lawsuits, no Google/Apple bans, no FTC probes. CEO Adam Foroughi’s rebuttal—“false assertions… we earn on value, not tricks”—and Wall Street’s defence (Wedbush’s “unwarranted,” Loop’s $650 target) suggest this 27% sell-off might be panic, not prophecy.

At ~$300-$310, you’re buying 40% below mid-February’s $510 high and 43% off the $525 record, with a forward P/E of ~50x 2025’s $6.16 EPS versus 74.7x pre-drop. If APP holds $290-$300 support, a rebound to $350-$400 by next week isn’t wild—20%-30% upside—especially if shorts cover without fresh ammo. The 780% 2024 run proves APP’s momentum; this could be a classic “buy the rumour, sell the news” dip exaggerated by froth (30x revenue).

  • The Risk Case

But it’s not all roses. Those short reports—while thin on proof—hit APP’s core: AXON’s integrity. If Google or Apple sniff policy breaches, an SDK ban could gut revenue—73% of Q4’s growth is software-driven. Meta suing over data theft or a class action on kid-tracking could escalate fast. The stock’s volatility—27% in two days, 43% from highs—screams uncertainty; short interest spiked 12.89% pre-reports (MarketBeat), and more could pile on. At $300, it’s still 5x its $50-$60 2024 floor—pricey if sentiment sours. A drop to $250-$225 (50% off $525) isn’t unthinkable if Friday’s open brings heavy volume or new bearish noise.

Retail Investor Playbook

If you’ve got no skin in the game, timing’s your edge. Here’s how to approach it:

  • Buy the Dip: If $290 holds on Friday, you can snag at $300-$310, 40% off the highs. If shorts fizzle, aim for $350-$400 (15%—30%); risk 10%—20% to $250. 

  • Wait and Watch: Hold off—$250-$280’s a steal if it overshoots, $330-$350 safer if it bounces. Check the news—silence is gold.

  • Avoid Chasing: Don’t FOMO without clarity; volatility burns. I’d nibble at $300—20%-30% upside outweighs unproven noise—but cap it small. Friday’s volume decides—steady, it’s a chance; tanking, it’s a pass.

Bottom Line

It’s an opportunity—tentatively. The beat ($1.37B, $1.73) and guidance ($1.36-$1.39B) outweigh the short-seller noise so far; 27% seems like an overreaction to speculation, not substance. I’d nibble at $300-$310—say, $500—betting on a bounce to $360-$380 by mid-March if APP’s rebuttal holds and platforms stay mum. But I’d cap it there; $250-$280’s in play if evidence emerges. Friday’s volume and news are your compasses—light selling and no bombshells, it’s a steal; heavy dump or a Google peep, it’s a pass.

@TigerWire

Third Short-Selling on AppLovin: Buy the Dip or Go Short?
AppLovin shares plunge 20% after third short-selling firm slams company’s ad technology Muddy Waters alleged that AppLovin’s ad tactics “systematically” violate app stores’ terms of service through “impermissibly extracting” user data. ------------- How do you view the third short selling on AppLovin? After 20% drop, will you buy the dip or go short?
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

  • Mortimer Arthur
    02-27
    Mortimer Arthur
    If short seller reports are baseless and inaccurate this is an incredible buy opportunity.
  • Enid Bertha
    02-27
    Enid Bertha
    CEO confimed fake shorts, this is going past 500 by next results and much more
  • dimpy
    02-27
    dimpy
    Interesting indeed
Leave a comment
3
7