Divergences On US MarketTrends

user
MaverickWealthBuilder
03-27

Core divergences

  1. Foreign Capital Flows: Goldman Sachs believes foreign capital (especially from Europe) will continue to flow; UBS warns of a possible return of capital to local markets.

  2. Rally Sustainability: Morgan Stanley is short-term bullish based on technicals; JPM emphasizes that weak fundamentals will limit the room for a rally.

  3. Economic cycle positioning: Deutsche Bank historical data suggests that the current pullback or non-bear market precursor; JPM believes that the risk of stagflation is more similar to a structural crisis.

Goldman Sachs: Foreign Capital Supports U.S. Stocks, Long-Term Growth Logic Unchanged $Goldman Sachs(GS)$

  • Core view: foreign capital (especially European investors) will continue to add to U.S. stocks and drive the market.

  • Argument support:

    • Liquidity advantage: the U.S. equity market is significantly more liquid than non-U.S. markets, attracting global capital.

    • Strong growth expectations: S&P 500 EPS growth is expected to be 7% in 2025-2026, well ahead of Europe (4% in 2025 and 6% in 2026).

    • Rising foreign ownership: foreign ownership has risen from 2% in 1960 to 18% in 2025, with European investors contributing nearly half of demand.

  • Risk Tip:

    • US economic policy uncertainty (e.g. guan tax, Trump policies).

    • Slowing domestic growth and weaker-than-expected returns from AI technology.

UBS (UBS): U.S. exceptionalism challenged, wary of foreign exit pressure $UBS Group AG(UBS)$

  • Core concern: U.S. asset overweight may face unwinding risk, the dollar may be sold off.

  • Logic Chain:

    • Weakening Growth Advantage: China's tech competition, U.S. fiscal austerity, and European security policy forces are weakening the relative attractiveness of the U.S.

    • Position structure vulnerability: foreign investors hold $13.7 trillion in US equity market capitalization (G-10 net unhedged exposure), a 5% reduction would trigger a $700 billion sell-off.

    • Market sensitivity: Private investor-led positions in US equities are more risk-sensitive and could accelerate capital flows back to Europe.

Deutsche Bank: Historical pullback statistics reveal market resilience $Deutsche Bank AG(DB)$

  • Data Conclusion:

    • Since 1928, the S&P 500 has experienced 60 pullbacks (declines of more than 10%), with only 28.8% evolving into bear markets (declines of more than 20%) and 71.2% stopping in the 10%-20% range.

    • 16.9% of the retracements did not fall more than 10.5%.

    • Recession correlation: some of the pullbacks were recession-related, but most did not deteriorate to a bear market.

Morgan Stanley: technical rally can be expected, stabilization in leading stocks is key $Morgan Stanley(MS)$

  • Short-term bearish logic:

    • Seasonality: month-end/quarter-end flows support rally.

    • Sentiment Repair: Oversold indicators (e.g., lower USD/US bond yields) provide short-term support, and the S&P may rally to 5,500.

    • Earnings stabilization signals: The "Big 7" earnings revisions are stabilizing, which may prevent the market from falling further.

    • Capital rotation: If leading stocks stabilize, international capital may flow back to U.S. stocks.

JPMorgan Chase (JPM): stagflation risk weighs on rally sustainability $JPMorgan Chase(JPM)$

Cautious view:

  • Nature of the rebound: currently only a technical fix after oversold, lack of fundamental support.

  • Cyclical differences: unlike the 2017 disinflationary environment, the current stagflation risk (PMI volatility, labor market weakness).

  • Policy risk: fiscal/monetary policy uncertainty exacerbates market volatility.

$S&P 500(.SPX)$ $NASDAQ(.IXIC)$ $Invesco QQQ(QQQ)$ $Dow Jones(.DJI)$ $Cboe Volatility Index(VIX)$ $SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust(SPY)$ $ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ(SQQQ)$ $ProShares UltraPro QQQ(TQQQ)$ $SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust(SPY)$

PE at a Historic Low! Would You Bottom Nvidia at $80?
Nvidia was down 33% from its high of $153.13. However, the last time Nvidia peaked at $346 (pre-split) in 2021, it declined 68% to $108 before bottoming out. Its PE and Forward PE both dip to a record low of 30 and 20. Now, with voices emerging that the semiconductor bull run is over, is the current correction far from enough? Its historic low of forward pe is 18 in 2025. If Nvidia further falls to $83, its forward pe will surpass the level in 2015. Would you bottom Nvidia at $80 or DCA now as it at a historic low level?
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

Leave a comment
1
7