Shyon
03-27

Honestly, I'm not too surprised by the rankings—Labubu taking the top spot was expected, given its massive fanbase and diverse series. Molly and Skullpanda are always strong contenders, but what really caught my eye was Crybaby's meteoric rise. The emotional resonance of the design, combined with overseas market traction, clearly made it a breakout success.

Dimoo staying in the top five also makes sense—it has a comforting, almost nostalgic appeal that resonates well, especially in stressful times. That said, I think 2025 might see more surprises. Hirono's fusion of traditional Japanese aesthetics and cyberpunk elements could gain even more traction, and ZSIGA's rebellious charm has the potential to explode, especially among younger collectors.

For me, the real question is whether Molly can maintain its throne. The market is shifting, and while nostalgia sells, newer designs like Crybaby and Hirono are tapping into deep emotional and cultural trends. If I had to bet, I'd say Labubu and Crybaby will continue to rise, and we might see an unexpected dark horse shake things up even more next year!

Bright future and bullish for $POP MART(09992)$   in near to mid term. 

@MillionaireTiger  @TigerStars  @Tiger_comments  @Tiger_SG  @TigerGPT  @Daily_Discussion  

Labubu Surpasses Molly! Which of Pop Mart's 5 Major IPs is Your Favorite?
After Pop Mart's release of its H2 2024 earnings, both revenue and profits exceeded expectations, with the stock rising 10.87%, hitting a new all-time high. The "Monsters" series surpassed Molly to become the top IP, accounting for nearly 30%. Plush toys saw a significant increase in their share, rising from less than 10% in the first half to 30%. ------------ With new IPs rising, which one is your favorite? Are you a fan of labubu or molly? Do you like the new IPs like Hirono or Crybaby?
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap
Leave a comment
1