The U.S.-China Chip War Reaches a Breaking Point

$Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing(TSM)$ $ASML Holding NV(ASML)$ $NVIDIA(NVDA)$ $Intel(INTC)$

A High-Stakes Battle for Tech Dominance

Let’s dive into the ongoing semiconductor battle between the U.S. and China—a high-stakes competition that could shape the future of technology. Over the past two years, the Biden administration has aggressively targeted China with sweeping sanctions, particularly in the semiconductor sector. The goal? To cut China off from cutting-edge chips made by U.S. companies like Nvidia and, ideally, cripple its tech industry.

The Final Wave of Sanctions Divides the World

Before leaving office, Biden introduced a final wave of chip restrictions, forcing the world to take sides—either aligning with U.S. policies or facing limitations on AI chip imports. The strategy aimed to slow China’s AI development while giving G7 nations a competitive edge. Countries were placed into different tiers, with China relegated to the lowest, restricting its access to even mid-tier U.S. semiconductors. Additionally, other nations were barred from exporting advanced chips to China, tightening the containment strategy.

China’s Surprising AI Breakthroughs

However, over the last three months, China has defied expectations, rolling out groundbreaking AI models that have disrupted the industry. DeepSeek, a Chinese AI model, not only outperformed OpenAI’s ChatGPT but did so at a fraction of the cost—nearly five times cheaper. Soon after, Menace AI emerged, shaking up the landscape once again. What’s even more remarkable is that China achieved this without access to the most advanced chips, spending under $10 billion and leveraging a team of engineers from a hedge fund to challenge U.S. tech dominance.

The Failure of Sanctions and the Rise of Open-Source AI

Taiwanese tech leaders, including industry experts, have pointed out the failure of these sanctions. The rise of open-source AI has further complicated the U.S. approach. While companies like OpenAI and Anthropic bank on closed models, they were caught off guard by China's ability to deliver high-performance AI at minimal cost. OpenAI, for instance, faces an estimated $7 billion in operating expenses for 2024, while DeepSeek runs at just 2% of that cost. This disparity has raised serious concerns about the long-term sustainability of U.S. AI firms.

The U.S. Doubles Down on Containment

Despite these setbacks, the U.S. has doubled down on its containment strategy. Earlier this month, the Trump administration made a major announcement: Taiwan’s chip giant TSMC would invest an additional $100 billion in U.S. semiconductor manufacturing. The plan includes six new chip plants and additional packaging facilities. Trump positioned this as a major victory for the American chip industry, leveraging tariffs to force TSMC’s expansion into the U.S.

The Cost of Manufacturing in America

However, this move raises critical questions. Manufacturing advanced chips in the U.S. is significantly more expensive—up to five times the cost of production in Taiwan. To attract TSMC, the Biden administration previously had to offer $6.6 billion in federal grants, essentially subsidizing the relocation effort. Even with these incentives, TSMC’s own founder has expressed skepticism, calling U.S. chip onshoring "wasteful and futile" due to a lack of skilled manufacturing talent and exorbitant costs.

The Uncertain Future of the Chip War

Ultimately, while the U.S. is pushing to build a domestic chip industry, the question remains: Is this strategy sustainable in the face of China’s rapid AI advancements and cost-effective innovation? The battle is far from over, and the coming months could redefine the future of global technology.

U.S. Tech Faces Permanent Weakness

The Cost Crisis of U.S. Semiconductor Manufacturing

Building chip factories in the U.S. is far more expensive than in Taiwan, making it impractical for TSMC to export U.S.-made semiconductors globally. Instead, the company will continue prioritizing production from its base in Taiwan, where costs are lower. To compensate for the higher expenses of U.S. operations, TSMC has confirmed it will charge customers significantly more for chips manufactured outside Taiwan—potentially 30% to 50% higher.

Warning Signs from TSMC’s CEO

TSMC’s chief executive has already cautioned the U.S. government about these cost burdens. Whether Trump has fully acknowledged these warnings remains unclear, but they shed light on why the Taiwanese chip giant is still investing in U.S. facilities. If a customer insists on local production, they must bear the added costs, and TSMC is likely to include its own markup. This pricing dilemma poses a major challenge to the U.S. semiconductor industry.

America's Supply Chain Crisis Deepens

The broader issue is that U.S. supply chains remain severely broken, a problem Trump is trying to address by securing a mineral agreement with Ukraine. Recently, he invoked emergency powers to ramp up domestic production of critical minerals, issuing an executive order to boost rare earth and essential metal extraction. This effort includes signing agreements worldwide—especially with Ukraine—to secure vital resources.

China’s Decades-Long Advantage in Critical Resources

However, reshoring chip production is not a simple fix. The U.S. faces a major challenge: China spent decades and trillions of dollars building an intricate supply network for critical minerals, securing dominance in essential materials for semiconductor production. China controls the majority of global magnesium, rare earth metals, and graphite, all of which are crucial for manufacturing chips. Even for metals like cobalt, China has built extensive international partnerships to secure steady imports.

Tariffs Won’t Solve the Core Problem

Rather than investing in long-term solutions, Trump has focused on using tariffs to force production back to the U.S. However, this approach fails to address the underlying supply chain vulnerabilities. Worse yet, the trade war has driven up material costs—copper, a critical component for semiconductor manufacturing, has surged to $10,000 per ton due to Trump’s policies. As a result, making chips in the U.S. has only become more expensive, further weakening America's position in the tech war.

Would you like any refinements or additional details?

TSMC's Massive Win, America’s Costly Gamble

The Skyrocketing Cost of U.S. Chip Production

Copper prices in the U.S. have surged, now costing at least 12% more than the global average. With a $1,200 price difference compared to London, semiconductor manufacturing in the U.S. has become significantly more expensive. To make matters worse, Trump’s upcoming 25% tariff on imported semiconductors will force American companies to rely on costlier domestic production, further driving up expenses.

A Cash Windfall for TSMC

For TSMC, this situation is a financial goldmine. With AI investment soaring, major tech companies are projected to spend $500 billion annually on computing infrastructure within the next decade. In 2025 alone, Microsoft and Amazon are expected to allocate $370 billion toward AI data centers—creating skyrocketing demand for Nvidia’s chips, which are manufactured by TSMC. While U.S. companies bear the brunt of higher costs, TSMC stands to profit enormously.

Taiwan’s Strategic Play: Limited Tech Transfer

Despite setting up operations in the U.S., Taiwan is carefully guarding its most advanced semiconductor technology. Officials have confirmed that TSMC will not produce 2nm chips or smaller in America until at least 2028, ensuring that the most cutting-edge innovations remain in Taiwan. This calculated move protects Taiwan’s technological edge, recognizing that U.S. foreign policy can be unpredictable.

A Divided Global Chip Market Emerges

Going forward, the world will likely see a split in semiconductor markets. The U.S. will buy domestically produced chips at significantly higher costs, while the rest of the world will source more affordable alternatives. Meanwhile, China continues to accelerate its semiconductor development, preparing to flood the market with cheaper AI chips that could outcompete American alternatives.

The Trade War’s Unintended Consequences

Beijing has responded to U.S. sanctions with escalating export restrictions on critical raw materials. In 2009, only 3,400 restrictions were in place—today, that number exceeds 18,000. Last December, China banned the export of gallium and germanium to the U.S., both essential for semiconductor production. As a result, U.S. manufacturing costs will rise even further, making AI models increasingly expensive for American users.

The Future of AI and Global Tech Dominance

With Washington likely to ban Chinese AI solutions like DeepSeek, American consumers will be left with costly, domestically produced AI models. The price of building the next wave of AI—whether it’s enterprise solutions or futuristic "Skynet"-like systems—will be staggering.

So, did the U.S. just trap its own tech industry in an unsustainable economic model? Was this a brilliant move for TSMC? Let me know your thoughts in the comments below.

Disclaimer: I want to make it clear that I am not a financial advisor, and nothing I say is intended to be a recommendation to buy or sell any financial instrument. Additionally, it's important to remember that there are no guarantees or certainties in trading or investing, and you should never invest money that you can't afford to lose.

@Daily_Discussion @TigerPM @TigerObserver @Tiger_comments @TigerClub