Tiger Weekly Insights: 2025/05/05—2025/05/11

DerivTiger
05-19

I. Performance and Valuation of Global Equity Indices

II. Key Market Themes

i. China–U.S. Talks Exceed Expectations — What’s Next? 

Last week brought positive developments in U.S. tariff negotiations. Midweek, the U.S. and U.K. formally announced a trade agreement. Though still a broad framework, it marks the first bilateral deal signed under Trump’s new tariff regime. In essence, the U.S. will maintain a minimum 10% tariff while offering sector-specific relief on steel, aluminum, and automobiles. In return, the U.K. agreed to lower its average tariff on U.S. goods from 5.1% to 1.8%, expand market access for ethanol, beef, and fruit, and purchase an additional $10 billion in Boeing aircraft. While the agreement lacks granular detail, it does clarify several important takeaways:

  • The 10% baseline tariff is Trump’s non-negotiable floor. If even the U.K.—the first to sign—didn’t receive a lower rate, other countries are unlikely to negotiate below that threshold.

  • The “reciprocal tariff” add-ons are flexible and negotiable. They can be lowered from the levels announced on April 2—or even reduced to zero—but in exchange, the counterparty must make concessions, such as opening up markets or buying U.S. goods.

The weekend’s China–U.S. economic and trade negotiations were full of twists and turns, yet the final outcome exceeded everyone's expectations. On Monday, both sides issued a joint statement, announcing that they would mutually cancel 91% of tariffs and suspend an additional 24%. As a result, U.S. tariffs on China dropped from 145% to 30%, and China’s tariffs on the U.S. fell from 115% to 10%—a result that surpassed even the market’s most optimistic forecasts. Unsurprisingly, markets responded with euphoria: both the Nasdaq and Hang Seng Tech Index surged nearly 5% in a single day. Admittedly, the outcome of this first round of talks was far better than we anticipated. But it also reinforces two key points discussed earlier:

  • The 10% baseline tariff is non-negotiable—Trump will not walk it back.

  • The additional tariff rates are bargaining chips, subject to gradual negotiation and tied to reciprocal concessions.

While the results were highly favorable, we advise a more cautious interpretation:

  • First, despite exceeding expectations, this deal merely resets the clock to the pre–April 2nd status—and with a new 10% baseline tariff still in place. In essence, the two sides have paused the fight, but core issues remain unresolved. Technology competition continues, and the trade imbalance persists. Future negotiations will likely shift toward specific industries and sensitive sectors, where addressing fundamental conflicts will be far more complex. This is only the beginning.

  • Second, Trump has a history of backtracking. In May 2018, the U.S. and China similarly issued a joint statement calling for reconciliation—but just weeks later, Washington unilaterally escalated the conflict by imposing new tariffs. That said, the current landscape is very different: China now has more negotiating leverage, and this time the joint statement includes substantive, mutual tariff reductions—something that did not happen in 2018. This signals that complete decoupling is untenable for both sides.

In short, it’s undeniably positive that negotiations have resumed—but one should not underestimate the difficulties ahead. Whether it’s China’s rare earths or America’s semiconductors, the stakes are not merely economic—they’re strategic. That’s why we previously identified April 2 as the most pessimistic point in the tariff cycle, and now, May 12 may well represent its most optimistic moment.

On the other hand, last week's May FOMC meeting delivered no surprises—and no shocks either. Chair Powell reiterated that the Fed is in no hurry to cut rates, continued to emphasize uncertainty, and opted once again for a wait-and-see approach. Interestingly, Powell explicitly stated that "if tariffs remain in place, there will be no progress on the dual mandate this year." Translated: If Trump doesn’t adjust his tariff policy, I won’t be able to lower rates. Meanwhile, the Q1 U.S. earnings season has been very strong. So far, S&P 500 EPS has grown 12% year-over-year, double the 6% growth expected by analysts. The "Magnificent 7" continue to act as the primary growth engine, widening their performance gap over the remaining 493 companies. Notably, tech giants like Meta, Google, and Microsoft have all reiterated—or raised—their capital expenditure guidance. We believe this strong fundamental backdrop is providing meaningful support for equity markets. Looking ahead, however, the real test lies in how hard data evolves under the new tariff regime. The recent market rally has been more a reflection of emotional relief than of a clear-eyed repricing of tariff risks. In short: stay alert, and avoid blind optimism.

Disclaimer

1. The information contained in this document is for reference only and does not constitute any financial advice or a transaction offer, solicitation, suggestion, recommendation or any guarantee for any financial product, strategy or service. You should make your own investment decisions and bear the risk of investment responsibility independently.

2. The content of this document is based on reliable data sources that the staff believed to be reliable at the time of production. The Tiger Investment Research team may adjust without prior notice. The Tiger Investment Research team does not guarantee the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the content of this document, and does not assume any responsibility for any transactions arising from the content of this article and its derivative consequences.

3. This document is confidential and non-public and can only be accessed by professionals with corresponding risk-taking capabilities and preferences. Without the prior consent of Tiger, no one may copy or distribute it in any form.

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

Leave a comment
1