A Volatile Collision of Power, Politics, and Profit
In a world where political theater increasingly influences market behavior, few individuals personify the intersection of innovation and controversy more than Elon Musk. The South African-born billionaire is the face of not only Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA), but also SpaceX, xAI, and the social media platform formerly known as Twitter, now rebranded as X. Despite—or perhaps because of—his relentless disruption of multiple industries, Musk continues to attract both praise and provocation.
In June 2025, that provocation took an unexpected turn. Former President Donald Trump, the presumptive 2024 Republican nominee, made a loaded comment during a rally that many interpreted as a veiled threat to investigate and potentially deport high-profile immigrants who had allegedly gamed the U.S. immigration system. Though Musk wasn’t named directly, social media exploded with speculation, prompting a selloff in Tesla stock and renewed scrutiny of Musk’s citizenship and role in the American economy.
The situation raises urgent questions for investors: Is Musk genuinely at risk of political targeting or removal? Could a second Trump presidency endanger Tesla’s strategic positioning, especially amid heightened anti-EV rhetoric? Or is this simply another chapter in the Musk-controversy saga—one that short-sighted investors may overreact to, while long-term shareholders calmly add on weakness?
In this in-depth breakdown, we’ll dissect the political narrative, evaluate Tesla’s current financial standing, explore the macro and regulatory risks, and present a case for both cautious optimism and defensive skepticism.
The Political Powder Keg: Trump’s Targeted Rhetoric
While Trump’s immigration comments may not seem new—he built much of his 2016 campaign on anti-immigration sentiment—the timing and tone were particularly striking this time. With Musk now arguably more influential than ever, some commentators have speculated that Trump views him as both a rival and a threat, especially given Musk’s growing sway over AI, EVs, and social media discourse.
Musk’s Legal Immigration Path
First, a fact check: Elon Musk became a naturalized U.S. citizen in 2002 after legally immigrating from South Africa to Canada, then to the United States. There is no evidence that his immigration process involved fraud or misrepresentation. Legal scholars and former DHS officials have confirmed that any attempts to retroactively strip citizenship would be constitutionally fraught and politically explosive.
However, it’s the symbolic threat that matters. If Trump seeks to punish companies or individuals associated with the “green transition,” Musk—despite his libertarian views and growing affinity with some conservative factions—could find himself in the political crosshairs, whether over federal subsidies, labor policy, or regulatory scrutiny.
Regulatory Backlash More Likely Than Deportation
While the probability of deportation is effectively zero, a Trump administration could still pose real risks for Tesla via the Department of Justice, National Labor Relations Board, or the EPA. Consider the following possibilities:
-
Investigations into Tesla’s labor practices, which unions have long criticized.
-
Scrutiny over Autopilot/FSD marketing claims, already a point of legal contention.
-
Revocation or scaling back of EV tax credits instituted under the Inflation Reduction Act.
-
Tariffs on batteries or components sourced from China or assembled in Mexico.
In short, the threat is not about Elon Musk leaving the country—it’s about a hostile policy environment that could meaningfully impact Tesla’s operations, margins, and market share.
Tesla’s Core Business Remains Operationally Strong
Despite the political uncertainty, Tesla remains a dominant force in the EV space. In Q1 2025, the company reported:
-
Revenue of $26.1 billion, up 15% year-over-year.
-
GAAP net income of $3.2 billion.
-
Operating margin of 10.8%, rebounding from 2024’s lows.
-
Free Cash Flow of $2.4 billion, with gross cash exceeding $22 billion.
Wall Street expects a strong Q2 as well, with consensus delivery estimates of 465,000–475,000 vehicles—helped by improved logistics in Giga Berlin, ramping production in Austin, and Model 3 refresh demand.
Diversification Beyond Automotives
Tesla’s value proposition increasingly extends beyond just EVs. Its energy segment—which includes solar panels, Powerwall batteries, and utility-scale Megapacks—generated over $1.7 billion in Q1 revenue. While margins remain slimmer, growth rates are accelerating.
The Full Self-Driving (FSD) beta program also continues expanding. With over 2 million global users and software update cycles accelerating, Tesla’s AI ambitions—powered by its proprietary Dojo supercomputer—could unlock new software subscription revenue streams.
What’s at Stake if Trump Wins in 2024?
The return of Trump to the White House would likely trigger a series of cascading policy shifts unfavorable to the EV sector. Already, he has framed the Biden-era EV incentives as “wasteful giveaways to China” and has vowed to “eliminate every EV mandate on day one.”
For Tesla, which benefits enormously from:
-
$7,500 EV tax credits,
-
Domestic battery production subsidies,
-
Federal charging infrastructure projects,
-
Favorable emissions credit trading,
...a policy reversal could reduce demand and squeeze profitability—especially in the high-margin U.S. market.
Trade and Tariff Risks
Trump’s known hawkishness on China—and potential tariffs on vehicles or batteries sourced from abroad—poses a further risk. Tesla’s Shanghai Gigafactory exports to Europe and Asia, and its upcoming Gigafactory in Mexico is expected to supply North America. New trade barriers could disrupt these supply chains.
However, Tesla’s global footprint also acts as a partial hedge. Unlike Ford or GM, Tesla can ramp Berlin and Shanghai to offset North American headwinds, limiting the damage.
Valuation: Still Premium, But More Justifiable Today
Tesla’s stock trades at around $215 per share, giving it a market cap of roughly $685 billion. That equates to:
-
65x forward earnings
-
11x forward sales
-
28x free cash flow
-
8.2x EV/EBITDA
Yes, these are elevated compared to legacy automakers—but Tesla is no traditional car company. The premium valuation reflects:
-
Vertical integration
-
Brand dominance
-
AI/autonomy optionality
-
Recurring software revenue potential
-
A loyal, global customer base
A DCF model assuming:
-
15% revenue CAGR (2025–2030),
-
12% operating margin,
-
10% discount rate,
-
and modest terminal growth (3%)
...yields a fair value estimate between $240–260, suggesting that Tesla is trading near the lower end of its intrinsic value range—depending on political risk.
Free Cash Flow: The Quiet Strength in the Background
For all the focus on deliveries and FSD, Tesla’s free cash flow is arguably its most underrated metric. In the last twelve months, Tesla generated:
-
$9.1 billion in free cash flow,
-
while spending ~$10 billion on capex—mostly to build new Gigafactories and develop Dojo.
Tesla’s FCF margin sits near 9%, ahead of most large industrial firms. Unlike many tech peers, Tesla isn’t burning cash—it’s reinvesting heavily in its own infrastructure, while maintaining ample liquidity. With over $22 billion in cash and negligible long-term debt, Tesla has the resources to weather a political storm or macro downturn.
Risks and Challenges Ahead
Even if Trump doesn’t directly target Musk, Tesla faces multiple headwinds:
-
Rising Competition: BYD in China and Hyundai/Kia in the U.S. are catching up on EV features and price points.
-
Commoditization of EVs: As more players enter, price wars are intensifying, particularly in China and Europe.
-
Regulatory Scrutiny: FSD faces ongoing investigations in both the U.S. and Europe. Safety-related lawsuits could become headline risks.
-
Labor Relations: Union efforts at Giga Berlin and Fremont may gain traction under a new administration.
-
Execution Risk: Any delays in the Cybertruck ramp, Giga Mexico, or software monetization could hurt forward multiples.
7 Key Insights for Investors
-
Trump’s comments are more political theater than legal threat, but they could still weigh on sentiment and policy stability.
-
Tesla’s global supply chain and factory diversification insulate it from localized shocks, particularly if the U.S. becomes less favorable.
-
Free cash flow generation remains robust, giving Tesla optionality to invest, acquire, or innovate regardless of subsidy volatility.
-
Valuation is more reasonable than during previous bubbles, but political risk premiums should be considered.
-
FSD, Dojo, and software subscriptions are long-term call options, but they require execution and regulatory approval.
-
The market still sees Musk as Tesla’s irreplaceable asset—any scenario that sidelines him could cause sharp drawdowns.
-
Short-term volatility presents long-term opportunity, but investors should scale in gradually and monitor policy developments.
Conclusion: Brace for Noise, But Don’t Lose Sight of the Signal
The idea of Elon Musk being deported may be laughable to legal scholars, but markets are not always rational. Political fear, policy uncertainty, and media firestorms can distort stock prices well before fundamentals change. For Tesla investors, the next 18 months will be defined not only by deliveries and earnings, but by the outcome of the 2024 election and the broader U.S. stance toward EVs and green tech.
For now, Tesla remains a market leader with deep cash reserves, expanding product lines, and a loyal global customer base. However, the risks are mounting. Investors must weigh the long-term innovation premium against short-term regulatory headwinds and margin compression.
Final Takeaways for Investors
-
Political noise is real—but rarely fatal.
-
Tesla's fundamentals remain strong—even without full subsidy support.
-
Valuation now reflects uncertainty, offering a more balanced risk/reward.
-
Musk is still central to the brand—and the stock.
-
This may be a volatile path to long-term gains.
Bottom Line: For patient investors, the current drama may be an opportunity in disguise—but only if you’re prepared to navigate the turbulence ahead.
Disclaimer: I want to make it clear that I am not a financial advisor, and nothing I say is intended to be a recommendation to buy or sell any financial instrument. Additionally, it's important to remember that there are no guarantees or certainties in trading or investing, and you should never invest money that you can't afford to lose.
@Daily_Discussion @TigerPM @TigerObserver @Tiger_comments @TigerClub
Comments