Lanceljx
08-30

Analysis: Overreliance on a Few Customers


NVIDIA’s Q2 (July 2025) earnings reveal that just two clients accounted for 39 % of total revenue—with one contributing 23 % and the other 16 % . The company also noted that large cloud service providers made up roughly 50 % of its data center revenue, a segment constituting 88 % of total revenue .


This level of client concentration poses legitimate revenue risk, as reliance on a few hyperscalers (e.g., Microsoft, Amazon, Google, Oracle) can lead to volatility if their capital expenditures shift or alter pacing.



---


Price Reaction: Post-Earnings Dips & Analyst Response


Despite reporting 56 % year-over-year revenue growth to $46.7 billion and projecting Q3 revenue of $54 billion—slightly above consensus—NVIDIA’s stock experienced a drop (around 1–3 %) post-earnings due to concerns including data-center performance and China export uncertainties .


However, many analysts leveraged the dip as a buying opportunity, reaffirming or raising price targets:


J.P. Morgan: target → $215, citing AI infrastructure pipeline strength .


Benchmark: target → $220 .


Argus Research: reiterated Buy, target → $220 .


Morgan Stanley: raised target to $210 .


Susquehanna: target raised to $210 from $180 .


Investopedia: key technical support levels identified—$174, $159, and $150; overhead resistance near $183 .


Yahoo Finance: consensus remains “Strong Buy”; some targets as high as $250, implying ~40 % upside .




---


Buying Opportunity: At What Price?


Given current sentiment and technical levels:


Level Significance


$174 Immediate support—mid-July peak; plausible near-term entry point.

$159 Secondary support—June highs; deeper dip entry.

$150 Stronger support—historical multiple peaks; opportunistic low-range entry.

$183 Resistance; a meaningful breakout could signal renewed momentum.

Analyst Targets: $210–$220 Reflect sector confidence and long-term upside expectations.

Bullish Outlier: $250 Represents highly optimistic scenario, with ~40 % potential from current ~$174.




---


Is the Post-Earnings Dip an Overreaction or Correction?


Short-term volatility appears largely driven by macro/geopolitical factors—data-center execution nuances and uncertainties around China exports—not a weakness in core AI demand or product leadership. The fundamentals remain robust, with Blackwell ramping strongly and confidence in sustained global AI infrastructure build-out .


Thus, the dip arguably reflects a healthy market correction, rather than a fundamental alarm. Analysts across the board have maintained or increased positive ratings, highlighting enduring tailwinds.



---


Summary Recommendation


The post-earnings dip appears to be a reasonable, sentiment-driven correction, not a derailment.


Support levels to watch for potential entries: $174, then $159, and $150.


Breakout above $183 could indicate renewed bullish momentum.


Analysts generally forecast $210–$220, with some aggressive targets up to $250, aligning with long-term AI growth narratives.


If your investment horizon is medium to long-term, cultivating positions in the $174–$150 range aligns with both technical signals and macro tailwinds.




Waiting Game: Nvidia at Highs, Add at $170 or Wait $150?
Nvidia’s Q2 revenue rose over 55%, but revenue in China dropped sharply by 24%, wiping out $93B in market value. After the last earnings report, Nvidia pulled back and consolidated before breaking to new highs, eventually climbing to $180. This time, the earnings aren’t actually bad — the recent surge just front-loaded the gains. 1. Is $170 the start of Nvidia’s new bull market, or should we wait for a pullback to the $150 support level? 2. What’s your choice — is it ever too late to buy Nvidia? 3. How will AVGO affect Nvidia stock price?
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap
Leave a comment