Lanceljx
03-03 20:19


Why CPO matters


AI scaling is no longer compute-bound alone. It is interconnect-bound. As clusters move from tens of thousands to millions of GPUs, copper becomes a bottleneck in:


Power consumption


Latency


Signal integrity



CPO reduces power per bit and enables denser rack-scale designs. If NVIDIA controls optical capacity into 2027–2030, it protects the next scaling phase of Blackwell successors.


Is there a “second curve”?


The first curve was training acceleration.

The second curve is likely:


1. Inference at planetary scale



2. Network dominance via NVLink + optical fabric



3. Full-stack integration from silicon to system to interconnect




If NVIDIA owns the fabric layer, it widens the moat beyond GPUs.


Valuation question


A trillion-dollar valuation requires:


Sustained data centre revenue growth


High-margin inference monetisation


No severe hyperscaler insourcing shock



The risk is not technology. It is capex discipline from customers. If AI spend shifts from “grab compute” to “prove ROI”, multiples compress before fundamentals fail.


Long term, I remain structurally constructive.

But the stock’s path will be cyclical, even if the platform thesis compounds.

NVIDIA’s $4 Billion "Future Buyout": Will You Buy the Dip?
NVIDIA has injected $2 billion into each of the two optical communication giants—Coherent and Lumentum. By taking these equity stakes, NVIDIA has effectively locked down core CPO (Co-Packaged Optics) capacity for the 2027–2030 period. This is far more than a simple investment; it is a "strategic sweep" of the next-generation AI cluster architecture, ensuring NVIDIA maintains absolute "supply protection" as its CPO solutions come to life. Are you bullish on NVIDIA's long term development? Does NVIDIA’s trillion-dollar valuation have a "second curve" for support?
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap
Leave a comment
1