Lanceljx
05-14 17:57

If you strip away the optics, the sequencing usually follows what can be signed quickly versus what requires regulatory clearance or political capital.


1) BA / GE – most immediate (highest probability) Aircraft orders are the cleanest “headline deliverable”. China can announce bulk orders for Boeing with engines tied to General Electric (GE Aerospace).

These deals are politically symbolic, commercially straightforward, and have precedent during state visits. Expect this first, possibly even during the visit.


2) MU / ILMN – medium-term (policy signalling first, fundamentals later) Micron Technology easing is plausible as a goodwill gesture. But actual earnings impact depends on procurement recovery, which takes quarters.

For Illumina, any thaw is slower. Genomics sits closer to national security sensitivities, so progress is incremental rather than headline-driven.


3) TSLA – conditional, regulatory lag Tesla FSD approval is the most market-sensitive, but also the least immediate. Even if discussions happen, China’s regulatory process, data localisation, and mapping constraints mean timelines are uncertain. You might get positive language, not approval.



---


Bottom line:

Expect BA/GE headlines first, MU sentiment shift second, and TSLA optionality last.


The absence of NVIDIA and Google reinforces that this visit is skewed towards industrial and legacy tech détente, not frontier AI.

Trump’s China Visit CEO List Revealed: Which Trading Opportunities to Watch?
Trump is about to visit China, and the accompanying executives include Musk, Micron, Meta, Boeing, and GE — NVIDIA and Google are absent. MU/ILMN — resilience from past frictions being repaired TSLA — FSD approval expectations triggered by Musk’s presence BA/GE — expectations for large aircraft orders to materialize Once the outcomes of the visit are announced, which of these themes do you think will materialize first?
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap
Leave a comment