東海吉龍 personal page - To The Moon

東海吉龍

東海吉龍

坚持自己的选择与目标！希望定能实现梦想！

195Follow

5Followers

1Topic

0Badge

2021-05-22

666

Bill Gates is under investigation for "close relationships," which could affect the division of his assets.

2021-05-12

666

Tiger Brokers has been included in the MSCI China All Equity Index!

2021-05-02

666

Was the US GDP relatively strong or weak in the first quarter?

2020-09-19

??

@Owen_trading room:10個點的調整已經結束了嗎？關於當前美股大盤，這裏有你應瞭解的一切

2021-05-24

666

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-05-07

666

Dropbox reported first-quarter revenue of $510 million, with net profit up 21% year-over-year.

2021-04-26

666

Copper prices soared to the highest level in a decade and the non-ferrous metals sector rose

2020-12-11

??

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-05-27

666

The United States buys time with money, and the whole world enters a "new era of mediocrity"

2021-04-12

666

Which of the three stocks favored by "Sister Wood" is the most worthy of investors' support?

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3536928846214760","uuid":"3536928846214760","gmtCreate":1573834824037,"gmtModify":1613484983395,"name":"東海吉龍","pinyin":"東hj龍東haiji龍","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"坚持自己的选择与目标！希望定能实现梦想！","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0ef8466588cf515f97a20c636e2be8a0","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":5,"headSize":195,"tweetSize":179,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":2,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":1,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-4","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Tiger Star","description":"Join the tiger community for 2000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dddf24b906c7011de2617d4fb3f76987","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/53d58ad32c97254c6f74db8b97e6ec49","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6304700d92ad91c7a33e2e92ec32ecc1","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2026.04.23","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001,"isScarce":0,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0}],"userBadgeCount":1,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"hot","tweets":[{"id":137120922,"gmtCreate":1622331132566,"gmtModify":1704182982938,"author":{"id":"3536928846214760","authorId":"3536928846214760","name":"東海吉龍","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0ef8466588cf515f97a20c636e2be8a0","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3536928846214760","authorIdStr":"3536928846214760"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"666","listText":"666","text":"666","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/137120922","repostId":"1125469611","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1125469611","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1622270854,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1125469611?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-29 14:47","market":"hk","language":"zh","title":"Xiaomi's Growth and Breakthrough: Technology-Driven Breakthrough to the High-End","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1125469611","media":"中国经营报","summary":"近日，小米好消息接连不断。\n5月26日，小米集团创始人、董事长兼首席执行官雷军发微博称，“美东时间5月25日下午4时09分，美国哥伦比亚特区地方法院颁发了最终判决，解除了美国国防部门对于本公司‘中国军","content":"<p>Recently, Xiaomi has been receiving a series of good news.</p><p>On May 26, Lei Jun, founder, chairman and CEO of Xiaomi Group, posted on Weibo, \"At 4:09 p.m. Eastern Time on May 25, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia issued a final judgment, lifting the U.S. Department of Defense's designation of the company as a 'Chinese military company' and officially removing all restrictions on U.S. investors purchasing or holding the company's securities.\"</p><p>This means that the lawsuit, which lasted for nearly four months, has finally been resolved. Following the announcement, Xiaomi opened higher at HK$28.25 per share in early trading on the 26th, reaching a high of HK$28.50 per share.</p><p>It is worth mentioning that on May 26, Xiaomi also released its first quarter 2021 performance report. At the same time, the Redmi Note 10 series phones were released.</p><p><b>Xiaomi wins lawsuit</b></p><p>The author learned that on January 14, the U.S. government added nine Chinese companies, including Xiaomi, to a blacklist of so-called \"Chinese military-related\" companies, preventing U.S. investors from investing in these companies. On January 29, Eastern Time, Xiaomi Group sued the U.S. Department of Defense and the U.S. Treasury Department in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.</p><p>At the time, Xiaomi issued an announcement stating that the company had noticed that the United States had included it in the relevant list. In its announcement, Xiaomi stated that the company has always adhered to legal and compliant operations and complies with the relevant laws and regulations of the places where it operates. Its services and products are all used for civilian or commercial purposes. The company will take appropriate measures to protect the interests of the company and its shareholders. In its announcement at the time, Xiaomi emphasized: \"Everything is currently operating normally.\"</p><p>In March of this year, Xiaomi issued a statement saying that a U.S. court had issued a temporary injunction, suspending the executive order designating Xiaomi as a Chinese military-related enterprise.</p><p>On the 26th, Lei Jun posted on Weibo, \"We won.\" On the same day, the topic \"Xiaomi removed from the US sanctions list\" became the second trending topic on Weibo, sparking heated discussions among netizens.</p><p>Xiaomi's victory marks a \"rare victory\" for Chinese technology companies in their clash with the U.S. government, given the numerous differences between the two countries on issues such as trade. This is a good sign for Chinese companies to defend their rights and interests internationally.</p><p><b>\"Breaking through\" the high-end market</b></p><p>Xiaomi's Q1 2021 financial report shows that in the first quarter of 2021, Xiaomi Group's total revenue reached 76.9 billion yuan, an increase of 54.7%, with revenue and profit setting new historical records. Among them, the high-end effect of mobile phones has become more prominent, becoming an important driving force for Xiaomi's performance improvement.</p><p>Meanwhile, the explosive performance of high-end products and the gradual enrichment of the high-end product matrix indicate that Xiaomi phones have successfully established themselves in the high-end market. In the future, Xiaomi's high-end product series will continue to inject greater growth momentum and space into Xiaomi Group.</p><p>Wang Xiang, partner and president of Xiaomi Group, said in a conference call, \"Our total revenue and adjusted net profit both set new records for a single quarter in Xiaomi's history. In the first quarter, we ranked third globally in smartphone shipments, with a market share of 14.1% and a year-on-year increase of 62%, maintaining a relatively fast growth rate among major manufacturers. The performance of our mobile phone business this quarter was mainly due to our continuous consolidation of our position in the high-end market.\"</p><p>For a long time, \"cost-effectiveness\" has been Xiaomi's hallmark, which has attracted a large number of young users. However, the capital market values profits more, and because Xiaomi phones have high cost-performance ratios but low profits, their stock price initially lagged behind, only to improve rapidly in 2020.</p><p>As can be seen from the first quarter report this year, Xiaomi's high-end mobile phones have seen significant growth and have gained an advantage in market share. Financial reports show that in the first quarter, Xiaomi's global shipments of smartphones priced at RMB 3,000 or more in mainland China and 300 euros or more overseas exceeded 4 million units. In addition, according to third-party data, Xiaomi's market share of smartphones priced between RMB 4,000 and RMB 6,000 in mainland China increased from 5.5% in the same period last year to 16.1% this quarter.</p><p>It is understood that in March, Xiaomi released three high-end phones: the Xiaomi 11 Pro, Xiaomi 11 Ultra, and MIXFOLD. From January to April, global orders for several mobile phones, including the Mi 11, Mi 11 Pro, and Ultra, exceeded 3 million units. Meanwhile, the Xiaomi 11 series ranked first in sales among Android phone series priced between 4,000 and 6,000 yuan in mainland China.</p><p>Mid-to-low-end mobile phones compete for market share, while high-end mobile phones earn profits. Xiaomi's record-breaking net profit in the first quarter was largely due to the outstanding performance of its high-end mobile phones, which also means that Xiaomi has established itself in the high-end mobile phone field.</p><p>It is worth mentioning that, in addition to maintaining its advantage in online sales channels, Xiaomi's shortcomings in offline channels are being rapidly made up for. As of the end of April, Xiaomi Home had more than 5,500 offline stores.</p><p><b>Innovation drives growth</b></p><p>During the conference call, Wang Xiang stated that Xiaomi's decent achievements in the high-end market are mainly due to technological innovation. \"To give a few examples, I've been talking about our continuous R&D investment over the past few quarters. First, in the camera field, the Ultra scored 143 points in the DXOMARK rating, ranking first in the global professional mobile phone camera rankings. At the same time, we also launched the GN2 image sensor, which is currently the largest image sensor in the industry.\" In terms of charging, the Xiaomi 11 Ultra is the first to feature a silicon-oxygen anode battery, resulting in faster charging, a lighter and thinner body, and support for 67W wireless flash charging, setting a series of benchmarks in the wireless charging industry.</p><p>Unlike in the past when growth was driven by \"cost-effectiveness,\" Xiaomi's products still offer great value for money, but the role of technology and innovation in helping Xiaomi's performance grow is becoming increasingly prominent. Financial reports show that Xiaomi's R&D investment reached 3 billion yuan in the first quarter, a year-on-year increase of 61.0%.</p><p>The enhancement of core technological capabilities has led to a comprehensive increase in Xiaomi's overall high-end production capacity and a significant improvement in its product capabilities. Specifically, in terms of products, more than ten high-end products in the Xiaomi 11 series have made their global debuts. Currently, Xiaomi possesses internationally leading testing capabilities in more than a dozen disciplines, including cameras, audio, radio frequency, antennas, electromagnetic compatibility, baseband, structure, optics, touch, thermal design, power consumption, batteries, reliability, and software stability.</p><p>For example, Xiaomi has already achieved global leadership in unlimited charging technology. At the end of March, at the Xiaomi 11 series product launch event, Xiaomi made its global debut with a silicon-oxygen anode battery. High energy density, long lifespan, and high performance silicon-oxygen anode batteries have once again raised the bar for the industry. For example, Xiaomi's third-generation under-display front camera solution has reached mass production and commercial standards, giving it a leading advantage in the industry.</p><p>With huge R&D investments, Xiaomi's R&D achievements are being continuously implemented. Xiaomi's ultra-high-end flagship model, the MIX FOLD, launched in March this year, features a 2K+ fully foldable screen, a liquid lens, and other cutting-edge technologies. Priced starting at 9,999 yuan, it perfectly combines technological innovation with cost-effectiveness.</p><p>It is evident that the premiumization of Xiaomi phones is a high-end development supported by technology. Breakthroughs in technological capabilities have led to improvements in Xiaomi's production capacity and efficiency, as well as enhancements in product experience and quality, laying a solid foundation for Xiaomi to continue opening up new high-end growth opportunities. Xiaomi's technology-defined premiumization will also usher in a new stage of competition in the high-end mobile phone market.</p><p>At the same time, Xiaomi's \"mobile phone × AIoT\" strategy has entered a period of rapid harvest. More and more consumers are choosing Xiaomi Smart Home because Xiaomi has chosen it; More and more consumers are choosing Xiaomi phones because of the potential of Xiaomi's smart home. In March 2021, the monthly active users of the AI assistant \"Xiao Ai Tong Xue\" reached 93 million; The number of monthly active users of the Mijia APP increased by 22.8% year-on-year to 49.2 million. At the end of March, Xiaomi officially announced its car manufacturing strategy, combining mobile phones with AIoT and car manufacturing. What kind of sparks will this create? This leaves people with endless imagination.</p><p>For a long time, online has been Xiaomi's home turf, and it achieved a doubling of its online mobile phone market share in the first quarter. In the first quarter, Xiaomi accelerated the expansion of its Xiaomi Home offline stores, exceeding 5,500 by the end of April.</p><p>Initially, Xiaomi focused on online channels, which helped save costs and achieve greater value for money. Today, a large number of Xiaomi AIoT blockbuster products have been launched, and the consumer demand for Xiaomi AIoT home devices in third-tier and lower-tier markets is constantly rising. A Xiaomi Home store selling both mobile phones and home devices can meet consumers' real needs and effectively reduce marketing costs compared to selling only mobile phones. This has become a unique advantage of the Xiaomi mobile phone brand.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Xiaomi's Growth and Breakthrough: Technology-Driven Breakthrough to the High-End</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nXiaomi's Growth and Breakthrough: Technology-Driven Breakthrough to the High-End\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">中国经营报</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-05-29 14:47</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Recently, Xiaomi has been receiving a series of good news.</p><p>On May 26, Lei Jun, founder, chairman and CEO of Xiaomi Group, posted on Weibo, \"At 4:09 p.m. Eastern Time on May 25, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia issued a final judgment, lifting the U.S. Department of Defense's designation of the company as a 'Chinese military company' and officially removing all restrictions on U.S. investors purchasing or holding the company's securities.\"</p><p>This means that the lawsuit, which lasted for nearly four months, has finally been resolved. Following the announcement, Xiaomi opened higher at HK$28.25 per share in early trading on the 26th, reaching a high of HK$28.50 per share.</p><p>It is worth mentioning that on May 26, Xiaomi also released its first quarter 2021 performance report. At the same time, the Redmi Note 10 series phones were released.</p><p><b>Xiaomi wins lawsuit</b></p><p>The author learned that on January 14, the U.S. government added nine Chinese companies, including Xiaomi, to a blacklist of so-called \"Chinese military-related\" companies, preventing U.S. investors from investing in these companies. On January 29, Eastern Time, Xiaomi Group sued the U.S. Department of Defense and the U.S. Treasury Department in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.</p><p>At the time, Xiaomi issued an announcement stating that the company had noticed that the United States had included it in the relevant list. In its announcement, Xiaomi stated that the company has always adhered to legal and compliant operations and complies with the relevant laws and regulations of the places where it operates. Its services and products are all used for civilian or commercial purposes. The company will take appropriate measures to protect the interests of the company and its shareholders. In its announcement at the time, Xiaomi emphasized: \"Everything is currently operating normally.\"</p><p>In March of this year, Xiaomi issued a statement saying that a U.S. court had issued a temporary injunction, suspending the executive order designating Xiaomi as a Chinese military-related enterprise.</p><p>On the 26th, Lei Jun posted on Weibo, \"We won.\" On the same day, the topic \"Xiaomi removed from the US sanctions list\" became the second trending topic on Weibo, sparking heated discussions among netizens.</p><p>Xiaomi's victory marks a \"rare victory\" for Chinese technology companies in their clash with the U.S. government, given the numerous differences between the two countries on issues such as trade. This is a good sign for Chinese companies to defend their rights and interests internationally.</p><p><b>\"Breaking through\" the high-end market</b></p><p>Xiaomi's Q1 2021 financial report shows that in the first quarter of 2021, Xiaomi Group's total revenue reached 76.9 billion yuan, an increase of 54.7%, with revenue and profit setting new historical records. Among them, the high-end effect of mobile phones has become more prominent, becoming an important driving force for Xiaomi's performance improvement.</p><p>Meanwhile, the explosive performance of high-end products and the gradual enrichment of the high-end product matrix indicate that Xiaomi phones have successfully established themselves in the high-end market. In the future, Xiaomi's high-end product series will continue to inject greater growth momentum and space into Xiaomi Group.</p><p>Wang Xiang, partner and president of Xiaomi Group, said in a conference call, \"Our total revenue and adjusted net profit both set new records for a single quarter in Xiaomi's history. In the first quarter, we ranked third globally in smartphone shipments, with a market share of 14.1% and a year-on-year increase of 62%, maintaining a relatively fast growth rate among major manufacturers. The performance of our mobile phone business this quarter was mainly due to our continuous consolidation of our position in the high-end market.\"</p><p>For a long time, \"cost-effectiveness\" has been Xiaomi's hallmark, which has attracted a large number of young users. However, the capital market values profits more, and because Xiaomi phones have high cost-performance ratios but low profits, their stock price initially lagged behind, only to improve rapidly in 2020.</p><p>As can be seen from the first quarter report this year, Xiaomi's high-end mobile phones have seen significant growth and have gained an advantage in market share. Financial reports show that in the first quarter, Xiaomi's global shipments of smartphones priced at RMB 3,000 or more in mainland China and 300 euros or more overseas exceeded 4 million units. In addition, according to third-party data, Xiaomi's market share of smartphones priced between RMB 4,000 and RMB 6,000 in mainland China increased from 5.5% in the same period last year to 16.1% this quarter.</p><p>It is understood that in March, Xiaomi released three high-end phones: the Xiaomi 11 Pro, Xiaomi 11 Ultra, and MIXFOLD. From January to April, global orders for several mobile phones, including the Mi 11, Mi 11 Pro, and Ultra, exceeded 3 million units. Meanwhile, the Xiaomi 11 series ranked first in sales among Android phone series priced between 4,000 and 6,000 yuan in mainland China.</p><p>Mid-to-low-end mobile phones compete for market share, while high-end mobile phones earn profits. Xiaomi's record-breaking net profit in the first quarter was largely due to the outstanding performance of its high-end mobile phones, which also means that Xiaomi has established itself in the high-end mobile phone field.</p><p>It is worth mentioning that, in addition to maintaining its advantage in online sales channels, Xiaomi's shortcomings in offline channels are being rapidly made up for. As of the end of April, Xiaomi Home had more than 5,500 offline stores.</p><p><b>Innovation drives growth</b></p><p>During the conference call, Wang Xiang stated that Xiaomi's decent achievements in the high-end market are mainly due to technological innovation. \"To give a few examples, I've been talking about our continuous R&D investment over the past few quarters. First, in the camera field, the Ultra scored 143 points in the DXOMARK rating, ranking first in the global professional mobile phone camera rankings. At the same time, we also launched the GN2 image sensor, which is currently the largest image sensor in the industry.\" In terms of charging, the Xiaomi 11 Ultra is the first to feature a silicon-oxygen anode battery, resulting in faster charging, a lighter and thinner body, and support for 67W wireless flash charging, setting a series of benchmarks in the wireless charging industry.</p><p>Unlike in the past when growth was driven by \"cost-effectiveness,\" Xiaomi's products still offer great value for money, but the role of technology and innovation in helping Xiaomi's performance grow is becoming increasingly prominent. Financial reports show that Xiaomi's R&D investment reached 3 billion yuan in the first quarter, a year-on-year increase of 61.0%.</p><p>The enhancement of core technological capabilities has led to a comprehensive increase in Xiaomi's overall high-end production capacity and a significant improvement in its product capabilities. Specifically, in terms of products, more than ten high-end products in the Xiaomi 11 series have made their global debuts. Currently, Xiaomi possesses internationally leading testing capabilities in more than a dozen disciplines, including cameras, audio, radio frequency, antennas, electromagnetic compatibility, baseband, structure, optics, touch, thermal design, power consumption, batteries, reliability, and software stability.</p><p>For example, Xiaomi has already achieved global leadership in unlimited charging technology. At the end of March, at the Xiaomi 11 series product launch event, Xiaomi made its global debut with a silicon-oxygen anode battery. High energy density, long lifespan, and high performance silicon-oxygen anode batteries have once again raised the bar for the industry. For example, Xiaomi's third-generation under-display front camera solution has reached mass production and commercial standards, giving it a leading advantage in the industry.</p><p>With huge R&D investments, Xiaomi's R&D achievements are being continuously implemented. Xiaomi's ultra-high-end flagship model, the MIX FOLD, launched in March this year, features a 2K+ fully foldable screen, a liquid lens, and other cutting-edge technologies. Priced starting at 9,999 yuan, it perfectly combines technological innovation with cost-effectiveness.</p><p>It is evident that the premiumization of Xiaomi phones is a high-end development supported by technology. Breakthroughs in technological capabilities have led to improvements in Xiaomi's production capacity and efficiency, as well as enhancements in product experience and quality, laying a solid foundation for Xiaomi to continue opening up new high-end growth opportunities. Xiaomi's technology-defined premiumization will also usher in a new stage of competition in the high-end mobile phone market.</p><p>At the same time, Xiaomi's \"mobile phone × AIoT\" strategy has entered a period of rapid harvest. More and more consumers are choosing Xiaomi Smart Home because Xiaomi has chosen it; More and more consumers are choosing Xiaomi phones because of the potential of Xiaomi's smart home. In March 2021, the monthly active users of the AI assistant \"Xiao Ai Tong Xue\" reached 93 million; The number of monthly active users of the Mijia APP increased by 22.8% year-on-year to 49.2 million. At the end of March, Xiaomi officially announced its car manufacturing strategy, combining mobile phones with AIoT and car manufacturing. What kind of sparks will this create? This leaves people with endless imagination.</p><p>For a long time, online has been Xiaomi's home turf, and it achieved a doubling of its online mobile phone market share in the first quarter. In the first quarter, Xiaomi accelerated the expansion of its Xiaomi Home offline stores, exceeding 5,500 by the end of April.</p><p>Initially, Xiaomi focused on online channels, which helped save costs and achieve greater value for money. Today, a large number of Xiaomi AIoT blockbuster products have been launched, and the consumer demand for Xiaomi AIoT home devices in third-tier and lower-tier markets is constantly rising. A Xiaomi Home store selling both mobile phones and home devices can meet consumers' real needs and effectively reduce marketing costs compared to selling only mobile phones. This has become a unique advantage of the Xiaomi mobile phone brand.</p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/w6a0xe3q02DwKBofdkhDJA\">中国经营报</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3df686d3a6ca977e8c6841905eb7e18c","relate_stocks":{"01810":"小米集团-W"},"source_url":"https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/w6a0xe3q02DwKBofdkhDJA","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1125469611","content_text":"近日，小米好消息接连不断。\n5月26日，小米集团创始人、董事长兼首席执行官雷军发微博称，“美东时间5月25日下午4时09分，美国哥伦比亚特区地方法院颁发了最终判决，解除了美国国防部门对于本公司‘中国军方公司’的认定，正式撤销了美国投资者购买或持有该公司证券的全部限制。”\n这意味着持续近4个月的诉讼终于得到了解决。消息公布后，小米26日早盘跳空高开于28.25港元/股，最高上探至28.50港元/股。\n值得一提的是，5月26日，小米还公布了2021年第一季度业绩报告。同时，发布了Redmi Note 10系列手机。\n小米胜诉\n笔者了解到，1 月 14 日，美国政府部门将小米等 9 家中国企业列入所谓“与中国军方相关”的黑名单中，阻止美国投资者对这些企业进行投资。美国东部时间 1 月 29 日，小米集团在美国哥伦比亚特区地方法院起诉美国国防部门和美国财政部门。\n当时，小米发布公告称，公司注意到，美国将本公司列入相关清单。小米在公告中称，公司一直坚持合法合规经营，并遵守经营地的相关法律法规，其服务和产品皆用于民用或商用。公司将采取合适的措施保护公司和股东的利益。小米在当时的公告中强调：“目前运转一切正常。”\n今年3月，小米公司发布声明称，美国法院已颁布临时禁令，暂停了把小米认定为中国涉军企业的行政命令。\n26日，雷军在微博称“我们赢了。”同日，“小米被移出美国制裁清单”话题已登上微博热搜第二位，引发网友热议。\n小米的胜诉，标志着中国科技企业在与美国政府部门的交锋中获得了“罕见的胜利”，毕竟中美两国在贸易等问题上存在不少分歧。这对于中国企业而言，是在国际上捍卫自身权益的好兆头。\n“突围”高端\n小米2021年第一季度财报显示，2021第一季度，小米集团总收入769亿元，增长54.7%，营收和利润再创历史新高。其中，手机高端效应进一步凸显，成为推动小米业绩提升的重要推动力。\n同时，高端产品业绩爆发及高端产品矩阵的逐渐丰富表明，小米手机已经成功站稳高端市场。未来，小米高端系列产品将持续为小米集团注入更大的增长动能和空间。\n小米集团合伙人、总裁王翔在电话会议上称，“我们的总收入和调整后净利都是创造了小米历史上单季的历史新高。第一季度，智能手机出货量排名稳居全球第三名，市场占有率达到了14.1%，出货同比增长62%，在主要厂商中依然维持了较快的增速。这个季度，手机业务的成绩最主要得益于我们在高端市场不断巩固的地位。”\n长久以来，“性价比”一直是小米的金字招牌，小米也因此吸引了大量年轻用户。可资本市场更看重利润，并因为小米手机性价比高，利润低，最初股价也迟迟没有表现，直到2020年才快速改观。\n透过今年一季报可以看到，小米高端手机显著增长，并在市场份额上占据优势。财报显示，一季度小米手机在中国内地定价在人民币3000元或以上及境外定价在300欧元及以上的智能手机全球出货量超过了400万台。此外，根据第三方数据，小米手机中国内地定价在人民币4000元至6000元区间的智能手机市场份额，由去年同期的5.5%提升至本季度的16.1%。\n据了解，3月份，小米发布了3款高端手机，小米11Pro，小米11ULtra和MIXFOLD。从1月份到4月份，包括Mi 11、Mi 11Pro和Ultra在内的几款手机全球累计的订单数突破了300万台。同时，小米11系列在中国内地市场4000~6000元的安卓手机系列里面销量排名第一名。\n中低端手机争夺份额，高端手机赚取利润。小米一季度净利润破纪录，小米高端手机的出色表现功不可没，这也意味着小米在高端手机领域已站稳脚跟。\n值得一提的是，除了线上销售渠道保持优势外，小米线下渠道短板正在被快速弥补。截至4月底，小米之家线下门店数突破5500家。\n创新驱动成长\n王翔在电话会议上称，小米之所以能够在高端市场取得还不错的成绩，最主要得益于技术创新。“举几个例子，我一直在讲我们在几个季度里面持续的研发投入，首先在相机领域里面，Ultra在DXOMARK评分里面143分，整个全球专业手机相机的排行榜排第一名。同时，我们还首发了GN2的影像传感器，这也是目前业内最大比的图像传感器。在充电方面，小米11Ultra首发了硅氧负极电池，手机触电更加快，机身更轻薄，也支持67瓦的无线闪充，在无线充电行业里面也树立一系列的典范。”\n和以往靠“性价比”驱动成长不同，小米产品性价比依然存在，但技术和创新在助力小米业绩成长上的作用愈发凸显。财报显示，一季度小米研发投入达到了30亿元，同比增长61.0%。\n核心技术能力的提升，带来的是小米整体高端产能的全面提升及产品能力的大幅进步。具体体现到产品上，小米11系列高端产品就有十多项全球首发。目前，小米在相机、音频、射频、天线、电磁兼容、基带、结构、光学、触控、热设计、功耗、电池、可靠性、软件稳定性等十几个学科领域均拥有国际领先的试验能力。\n比如，小米在无限充电技术上，已经实现全球领跑。3月底，在小米11系列产品发布会上，小米全球首发了硅氧负极电池。高能量密度、高寿命、高性能的硅氧负极电池，再次提升了新的行业门槛。再比如，小米的第三代屏下前摄方案已经达到了量产商用标准，在行业处于领先优势。\n巨额的研发投入下，小米研发成果正在不断落地。今年3月上市的小米超高端旗舰机型MIX FOLD，采用2K+全面折叠屏、液态镜头等多项黑科技，售价9999元起，将科技创新与性价比做到了完美。\n可见，小米手机的高端化是以技术作为支撑的高端。技术能力的突破，带来小米产能效率的提升以及产品体验、品质的提升，将持续为小米打开新的高端增长空间打下坚实的基础。而小米以技术定义的高端化，也将使高端手机的竞争进入新的阶段。\n与此同时，小米“手机×AIoT”战略进入了快速收获期。正在有越来越多的消费者，因为小米选择了小米智能家居；越来越多的消费者，因为小米智能家居的潜力，选择小米手机。2021年3月，人工智能助理“小爱同学”月活跃用户数达到9300万；米家APP的月活跃用户数同比增长22.8%，达到4920万。3月底，小米官宣造车，手机×AIoT+造车，能碰撞出怎样的火花，给人以无限遐想。\n长期以来，线上一直是小米的主场，并实现了一季度手机线上市场份额翻倍增长。一季度，小米加快了小米之家线下门店扩张步伐，截至4月底突破5500家。\n最初小米主攻线上，有利于节约成本，节省出更多的性价比。如今，小米AIoT大量爆款商品落地，三线以下下沉市场对小米AIoT家居设备的消费需求不断上涨。一家小米之家同时卖手机和家居设备，既可以满足消费者切实需求，同时相较只卖手机也可以有效降低营销成本。这成为小米手机品牌的独特优势。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"01810":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":5838,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":132724324,"gmtCreate":1622117672068,"gmtModify":1704179755218,"author":{"id":"3536928846214760","authorId":"3536928846214760","name":"東海吉龍","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0ef8466588cf515f97a20c636e2be8a0","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3536928846214760","authorIdStr":"3536928846214760"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"666","listText":"666","text":"666","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/132724324","repostId":"1171660212","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1171660212","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1622115884,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1171660212?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-27 19:44","market":"hk","language":"zh","title":"The United States buys time with money, and the whole world enters a \"new era of mediocrity\"","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1171660212","media":"投资作业本","summary":"全球化配置的时代已经开始了。","content":"<p>This year is not a bear market for US stocks; a bear market is definitely a global systemic risk. \"The Federal Reserve's monetary policy framework has changed drastically since 2019; it has completely changed. Many investors, especially those in mainland China, now believe that the US stock market is going to collapse, that the US is doomed, that inflation in the US stock market is so high, and that the economy is so good. The US is simply overheating. No matter how you look at it, you feel that the Federal Reserve needs to accelerate its tightening pace. But in fact, this kind of thinking is using an 'old map,' that the Federal Reserve has been focusing on inflation for a long time, and that paying attention to inflation is better than anything else.\"</p><p>\"In the second half of the year, the US economy will show resilience. It's not that it will suddenly jump down from eighteen floors, but that it will maintain a range of fluctuations, and the overall marginal growth momentum will weaken. At this time, there is no need to implement stimulus policies. This is the first point. The dimension of US economic growth will slow down, and the month-on-month momentum will weaken.\"</p><p>\"In the second half of the year, the unemployment rate (in the United States) will ease... This round of decline in the unemployment rate in the United States has been relatively smooth, rather than rapid and steep... (The Federal Reserve) will still focus on employment. Before the United States achieves full employment and before the pressure of social conflicts eases, it will be difficult for the United States to recover all at once.\"</p><p>\"US inflation will not fall all at once in the second half of the year. The peak of inflation will be in the second quarter, but inflation may still hover at a high level in the second half of the year. The Federal Reserve needs to control the real interest rate in the US.\"</p><p>\"Against the backdrop of the current great power competition, we believe that the United States is buying time with money. This is a rewriting of the American Dream, which means that whether it is the US dollar, the US dollar exchange rate or the US long-term Treasury yield, they will ultimately obey the so-called new American Dream. Money is used to buy time, time for the US economic recovery and time for the expansion of US domestic demand. Recently, whether it is with South Korea or some other regions, the United States hopes that advanced manufacturing in these regions can come to the United States, buy time for manufacturing to return to the United States, and buy time for US technological innovation and upgrading.\"</p><p>\"Before the policy shift, it is actually predictable that the Federal Reserve will guide market expectations. Moreover, before the Fed's policy, there may be other policies, including taxes.\"</p><p>\"The Federal Reserve's policy is like the master valve of global liquidity, and we are unlikely to see this master valve tighten until at least the first quarter of this year or next year.\"</p><p>\"These companies, which are the backbone of the US stock index, are not expensive. They are not expensive globally, and they are not expensive compared to A-shares. On the contrary, relatively weaker and more thematic companies are more expensive.\"</p><p>\"The US stock market is definitely not a bear market. A bear market in the US stock market at this time is definitely a global systemic risk... As long as the US stock market is not a big bear market, it is a bull or structural market, which will bring opportunities to other markets around the world.\"</p><p>\"Don't think that the US stock index is very strong and ignore the professional and institutional characteristics of the US stock market. I have always said that we should try to focus on buying funds and investing in funds through fixed investment programs, so that professional investors can participate in the US stock market. Don't consider the US stock market with the mindset of speculating on A-shares or with the mindset of retail investors.\"</p><p>\"The world has entered an era of low growth and low interest rates, a new era of mediocrity. At this stage, we need to find the best companies in the world... The era of global allocation has begun.\"</p><p>On May 25, during a live broadcast of \"Cloud Conference | Global Capital Market Linkage, What is the Allocation Value of US Stocks?\" hosted by CBN, Zhang Yidong, Global Chief Strategist at Industrial Securities, shared the above views.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f539f1c96458b7ed999579cf5647d0ff\" tg-width=\"677\" tg-height=\"457\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>The following are the highlights of my investment workbook, which I would like to share with you:</p><p><b>The Federal Reserve's monetary policy framework has changed significantly, and we can no longer think with old-fashioned thinking.</b></p><p>Q: For the first time since the outbreak of the pandemic, Federal Reserve officials have discussed the possibility of tightening monetary policy. What does this mean for global markets?</p><p>Zhang Yidong: If people try to find the way forward using old maps, thinking that the Fed's tightening and bond purchases this time may lead to further tightening in the distant future, their approach is wrong. Conversely, if they conduct more in-depth research on the US stock market, they will find that the Fed's monetary policy framework has changed significantly since 2019 compared to before; it has completely changed.</p><p>Many investors, especially those in mainland China, believe that the US stock market is about to crash and the US is doomed. With inflation so high and the economy so good, the US is simply overheating. No matter how you look at it, you feel that the Federal Reserve needs to accelerate its tightening pace. But in fact, this kind of thinking is using an \"old map,\" believing that the Federal Reserve has been focusing on inflation for a long time and that focusing on inflation is better than anything else.</p><p><b>The US economy remains resilient in the second half of the year, and there is no need for stimulus policies at this time.</b></p><p>The US economy will show resilience in the second half of the year. It's not that it will suddenly jump down from eighteen floors, but rather that it will maintain a range of fluctuations, and the overall marginal growth momentum will weaken. At this point, there is no need for stimulus policies. This is the first point: the dimension of US economic growth will slow down, and the month-on-month momentum will weaken.</p><p>Secondly, in terms of the unemployment rate, the economic data for April was very good. The unemployment rate was 6.1%, slightly higher than in March, indicating a shift from simple to luxurious, and from luxurious to simple and difficult. Over the past year, the United States has experienced three rounds of massive monetary easing and bailouts. Low- and middle-income earners in the United States will take the bailout money to enjoy themselves first and spend it first. The US savings rate is still as high as 13.6%, while the historical average is 6-8%, which is its normal savings rate level. Therefore, they are not in a hurry to work or find jobs. Under these circumstances, the unemployment rate is relatively high.</p><p><b>The Fed's focus remains on employment.</b></p><p>In the second half of the year, the unemployment rate will ease because he needs to find work, and the savings rate will decline. However, the US economy won't be that bad in the second half of the year. He might be able to do odd jobs, which will make the decline in the US unemployment rate relatively smooth, rather than a rapid and steep one.</p><p>The Federal Reserve paid more attention to the unemployment rate, so much so that when the April inflation data was released, on May 12, US time, US inflation far exceeded expectations, causing an uproar in the market. At that time, many risky assets plummeted, triggering minor global turmoil that day.</p><p>However, several important figures with voting rights at the Federal Reserve, including the Fed Vice Chairman and another important official, stated that they saw the data and suggested that inflation caused by short-term transitional supply factors and employment factors were more worrying, so their focus was still on employment. Before the United States achieves full employment and before the pressure of social conflicts eases, it will be difficult for the United States to clean up its mess all at once.</p><p>US inflation peaked in the second quarter, and inflation hovered at a high level in the second half of the year.</p><p>Third, US inflation will not fall all at once in the second half of the year. Inflation will peak in the second quarter, but it may still hover at a high level in the second half of the year, requiring the Federal Reserve to control US real interest rates.</p><p><b>America buys time with money</b></p><p>Real interest rates are crucial to the recovery of the US economy, and in turn, they also play a guiding role in nominal interest rates. As you can see, everyone was very worried in mid-March, but in mid-March we clearly stated that US long-term Treasury yields would not pose a systemic risk. Against the backdrop of the current great power competition, we believe that the US is buying time with money, which is a rewriting of the American Dream. This means that whether it is the US dollar, the US dollar exchange rate, or US long-term Treasury yields, they will ultimately obey the so-called new American Dream. Money is used to buy time, time for the US economic recovery, time for the expansion of US domestic demand. Recently, whether in relations with South Korea or some other regions, the US hopes that advanced manufacturing in these regions can come to the US, buying time for manufacturing to return to the US and time for US technological innovation and upgrading.</p><p>Overall, under the current circumstances, neither employment nor inflation, nor the United States' need to enhance its competitiveness and maintain the sustainability of economic growth, are far from reaching a stage of contraction.</p><p>There are no systemic risks this year, and tightening market concerns have actually provided opportunities to invest in high-quality assets globally.</p><p>To summarize, my view is that everyone needs to see clearly the trump cards of the American elite and Powell's trump cards. Powell will be deciding on a second term next year, and under these circumstances, his focus will be more on the sustainability of economic growth and employment. That's why we say it's irreversible, and there are no systemic risks this year.</p><p>When the market is worried about tightening US policies, which will trigger global concerns, the resulting shock is a short-term disturbance. Instead, it gives us the opportunity to invest in higher-quality and more cost-effective assets globally. This is my thinking.</p><p>What impact would it have if the Federal Reserve's monetary policy shifted to tightening?</p><p>First, contraction will inevitably lead to adjustments in overvalued assets, even in a more drastic way.</p><p>Secondly, if it contracts, it will also lead to differentiation, especially for emerging markets. At that time, it is important to pay attention to the fact that the rebound of the US dollar will create a trend of suppression on commodities, which will put enormous pressure on emerging markets that rely mainly on midstream and upstream raw materials and minerals, and may even lead to debt risks and debt crises in emerging markets.</p><p>For US stocks, high valuations, especially some thematic junk stocks, will undergo a significant adjustment, and history will repeat itself. What should we focus on now? When will it actually turn?</p><p>It is unlikely that the Federal Reserve will tighten its policy this year or even in the first quarter of next year.</p><p>Before the policy shift, it was actually predictable that the Federal Reserve would guide market expectations. Moreover, before the Federal Reserve's policy, there may be other policies, including taxes.</p><p>In the second half of today, there will also be questions about whether tax increases will be approved by the State Taxation Administration, changes in taxes, bond issuance, and fiscal stimulus packages. Overall, we believe that this year and even the beginning of next year, we can basically see the Federal Reserve's trump cards clearly.</p><p>Frankly speaking, the global monetary system is still an international monetary system dominated by the US dollar. Therefore, the Federal Reserve's policy is equivalent to the master valve of global liquidity. At least in the first quarter of this year or even next year, it is difficult to see the master valve tighten.</p><p>It's even possible that the opposite could happen. If the US economy is weaker than people imagine in the second half of the year, the Federal Reserve might slightly amplify the overall valve. This would have the opposite effect, bringing better value-for-money assets worldwide, including some high-quality companies in the US stock market, European stocks, Chinese A-shares, Hong Kong stocks, and emerging market stocks.</p><p>It's okay to have a vague concept of the Fed's judgment. It's difficult to make a judgment about the general trend. It's difficult to be precise down to the month or week. We're taking it one step at a time. At least we can judge that the general trend is that we won't see the Fed tightening this year.</p><p><b>The slow and prolonged bull market in the US stock market is driven by the best companies.</b></p><p>Q: Can US stocks continue to improve? How long will it take for things to improve?</p><p>Zhang Yidong: Let's look at this from three perspectives: First, let's look at this from a structural perspective. The US stock market itself has three major indices. We often talk about the Dow Jones, Nasdaq, and S&P 500. Among these three indices, the best American companies, represented by Apple and Microsoft, mainly lead the index. Similarly, when we select the best companies in China to create an index, we are actually a super bull market.</p><p>Don't get the idea that everything in America is fine. In the US market, a large number of companies have launched, cleared, or delisted directly. A considerable number of companies have no trading volume and are like dead companies, suffering from a discount in liquidity. Therefore, in mature markets, it's truly a winner-takes-all situation. The best companies have reliable performance, and people give them valuations that match their profit growth, so we believe their sustainability is relatively long.</p><p>The US stock market itself is an index system, and its mechanism for effectively selecting the best companies is actually worth learning from. Moreover, its trading mechanism, whether it is T+0 or short selling, ensures its slow and long-term bull market, so that the best companies do not rise several times in a year or a year and a half, only to be Game over and not recover for several years.</p><p>From a structural perspective, the US stock market is driven by the best group of companies, which in turn benefit from its sound market mechanisms, trading mechanisms, and a series of market-oriented mechanisms, resulting in a very small bubble for the best group of companies.</p><p><b>Core companies in the US stock market are not expensive.</b></p><p>We often say that US-listed companies are expensive, but we can say that they are expensive from two perspectives:</p><p>First, the backbone of the US stock market, which can drive the US stock index upwards, is not expensive. It is not expensive globally, and it is not expensive compared to A-shares. On the contrary, those that are relatively weaker and more thematic are more expensive.</p><p>Secondly, because its interest rates are low, after rising for so long, the 10-year Treasury Bond yield in the US stock market is only 1.6 or 1.7. This is the first point. Looking at the structure of the US stock market, until the US substantially tightens the tap (substantial contraction), the path of the most outperforming companies in the US stock market leading the index is unlikely to end.</p><p><b>This year is not a bear market for US stocks; a bear market is definitely a global systemic risk.</b></p><p>Second, differences between countries. We believe that the US stock market is not in a bear market this year. At the end of last year, many people said they were not optimistic about the US stock market this year, but I said that the US stock market is definitely not in a bear market. If the US stock market is in a bear market at this time, it must be a global systemic risk. If the US stock market experiences a bear market this year, it will definitely be because the Federal Reserve has tightened its overall valve. This is a global systemic risk, and neither A-shares, emerging markets, nor European stock markets can withstand it.</p><p>On the second level, from a global perspective, if the United States leads a systemic tightening of the global monetary system, it may not necessarily mean that US stocks are the best performers. Since the beginning of the year, US stocks have underperformed European stock markets, and some of their indices have even underperformed relatively well-performing emerging market stock markets. As long as the US stock market is not a major bear market, but rather a bull or structural market, it presents opportunities for other global markets. This is a comparison between country markets and regional stock markets.</p><p>Third, style. Clearly, the style of US stocks this year has been that small and mid-cap stocks have outperformed large-cap stocks, and cyclical and value stocks have outperformed growth stocks. This has been the case since the beginning of the year. However, there may be changes, and the growth style may improve in the second half of the year.</p><p>From a long-term perspective, the United States is still an economy driven by technology and domestic demand. From a style perspective, its backbone is still these giants with technological innovation capabilities, which are driving the US stock market. This year, the Dow Jones, Russell 3000, and Russell 2000 have performed much better than the Nasdaq since the beginning of the year.</p><p>However, we see that US stocks are not rising and falling simultaneously; they are rising in a style, such as value stocks rising and growth stocks adjusting. Whether it's Chinese concept stocks or pure US stocks in the US, many growth-oriented stocks have actually adjusted by more than 30%-50% since the beginning of this year. Don't assume that the US stock index is very strong and ignore the professional and institutional characteristics of the US stock market. I've always said that we should focus on buying funds and investing in funds through regular fixed-amount investments, so that professional investors can participate in the US stock market. We shouldn't consider the US stock market with the mindset of speculating on A-shares or with the mindset of retail investors.</p><p><b>Three points to note when investing in QDII: Know yourself, use long-term strategies against short-term strategies, and use slow-term strategies</b></p><p>Q: What should I pay attention to when investing in QDII?</p><p>Zhang Yidong: QDII itself is a tool, a product, a product that helps enrich asset allocation. There are a few concerns:</p><p>First, understand yourself. Before understanding a product, first look at what you are like. Because not everyone can make money on certain products. For example, the products of some famous fund managers may have increased dozens of times in more than ten years, but it was useless. Holders sold them after a short while.</p><p>Some people say that buying QDII is like buying various A-share products. When I make a swing trade, I often end up losing money. Knowing yourself is very important. Your risk tolerance is different whether you should make a swing trade or just make a long-term allocation.</p><p>Second, focus on using long-term strategies to combat After buying, try to know that the QDII you are buying is in a relatively unfamiliar market outside your own circle of competence. You need to go through a relatively familiar process with the fund manager. You need to be truly professional and have a genuine understanding of the market. Recognizing that making money in the US stock market doesn't depend on timing, but on good, high-quality companies. Investing in companies when they offer suitable cost-effectiveness is ultimately a measure of value.</p><p>Third, fight fast with slow motion. Because people are interested in overseas markets, they often feel that the A-share market is hopeless and prefer to invest their money, as the returns are better than those in the A-share market. However, the style of A-shares can go crazy very quickly. Many people cut their losses when the A-share market rises, directly withdrawing their money from QDII investment.</p><p>These three points—self-awareness, using long-term skills to combat short-term skills, and using slow skills to combat fast skills—are my advice to everyone. Even if the US stock market index is doing very well, if we cannot have a clear understanding of ourselves, I suggest that everyone should rather do what they are good at than follow the crowd.</p><p>In 2007 and 2008, when QDII was very popular, many people took advantage of the hype to subscribe to QDII and lost a lot of money, cutting their losses and getting out of the market.</p><p>Therefore, when subscribing to a QDII, you need to consider the investor's asset allocation philosophy and the assessment period. Once you understand yourself, it is always a good choice. Just like financial management, you take out money that you don't need urgently in the short term and continuously invest it regularly. Your purpose is very clear: to buy some assets that are not available in the A-share market, or even through the Hong Kong Stock Connect, assets that are not even available in the Hong Kong stock market, to buy the best global core assets, not just the core assets of A-shares and Hong Kong stocks in China. This is my sharing.</p><p><b>The era of global allocation has begun; we need to find the world's best companies.</b></p><p>Q: If we want to invest in QDII, is QDII a mandatory target in our basket? Is this a very important tool for allocating assets in our basket?</p><p>Zhang Yidong: Definitely, because the world has entered an era of low growth and low interest rates, a new era of mediocrity. At this stage, we need to find the best companies in the world. In 2016, I proposed the concept of Chinese core assets. In fact, this concept can be expanded to the whole world, whether it is Europe, Japan, or the United States. We need to find the best companies globally and continuously provide assets with core competitiveness and good cost-effectiveness.</p><p>When Chinese people's social wealth has accumulated to a certain stage, and our per capita GDP has now reached $10,000, based on the experience of Europe and the United States, this is precisely the beginning of the global allocation of wealth in the United States. Based on this experience, we should start considering regular fixed-amount investments in QDII (Qualified Domestic Investment Institutions) to gradually become familiar with such excellent managers. We should not put all our energy into it at once. If we put all our energy into it, we may become disheartened and heartbroken because of a fluctuation. It is best to take it slow, using long-term investments against short-term investments and slow investments against fast investments. However, the era of global allocation has already begun.</p>","source":"lsy1597111094582","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The United States buys time with money, and the whole world enters a \"new era of mediocrity\"</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe United States buys time with money, and the whole world enters a \"new era of mediocrity\"\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">投资作业本</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-05-27 19:44</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>This year is not a bear market for US stocks; a bear market is definitely a global systemic risk. \"The Federal Reserve's monetary policy framework has changed drastically since 2019; it has completely changed. Many investors, especially those in mainland China, now believe that the US stock market is going to collapse, that the US is doomed, that inflation in the US stock market is so high, and that the economy is so good. The US is simply overheating. No matter how you look at it, you feel that the Federal Reserve needs to accelerate its tightening pace. But in fact, this kind of thinking is using an 'old map,' that the Federal Reserve has been focusing on inflation for a long time, and that paying attention to inflation is better than anything else.\"</p><p>\"In the second half of the year, the US economy will show resilience. It's not that it will suddenly jump down from eighteen floors, but that it will maintain a range of fluctuations, and the overall marginal growth momentum will weaken. At this time, there is no need to implement stimulus policies. This is the first point. The dimension of US economic growth will slow down, and the month-on-month momentum will weaken.\"</p><p>\"In the second half of the year, the unemployment rate (in the United States) will ease... This round of decline in the unemployment rate in the United States has been relatively smooth, rather than rapid and steep... (The Federal Reserve) will still focus on employment. Before the United States achieves full employment and before the pressure of social conflicts eases, it will be difficult for the United States to recover all at once.\"</p><p>\"US inflation will not fall all at once in the second half of the year. The peak of inflation will be in the second quarter, but inflation may still hover at a high level in the second half of the year. The Federal Reserve needs to control the real interest rate in the US.\"</p><p>\"Against the backdrop of the current great power competition, we believe that the United States is buying time with money. This is a rewriting of the American Dream, which means that whether it is the US dollar, the US dollar exchange rate or the US long-term Treasury yield, they will ultimately obey the so-called new American Dream. Money is used to buy time, time for the US economic recovery and time for the expansion of US domestic demand. Recently, whether it is with South Korea or some other regions, the United States hopes that advanced manufacturing in these regions can come to the United States, buy time for manufacturing to return to the United States, and buy time for US technological innovation and upgrading.\"</p><p>\"Before the policy shift, it is actually predictable that the Federal Reserve will guide market expectations. Moreover, before the Fed's policy, there may be other policies, including taxes.\"</p><p>\"The Federal Reserve's policy is like the master valve of global liquidity, and we are unlikely to see this master valve tighten until at least the first quarter of this year or next year.\"</p><p>\"These companies, which are the backbone of the US stock index, are not expensive. They are not expensive globally, and they are not expensive compared to A-shares. On the contrary, relatively weaker and more thematic companies are more expensive.\"</p><p>\"The US stock market is definitely not a bear market. A bear market in the US stock market at this time is definitely a global systemic risk... As long as the US stock market is not a big bear market, it is a bull or structural market, which will bring opportunities to other markets around the world.\"</p><p>\"Don't think that the US stock index is very strong and ignore the professional and institutional characteristics of the US stock market. I have always said that we should try to focus on buying funds and investing in funds through fixed investment programs, so that professional investors can participate in the US stock market. Don't consider the US stock market with the mindset of speculating on A-shares or with the mindset of retail investors.\"</p><p>\"The world has entered an era of low growth and low interest rates, a new era of mediocrity. At this stage, we need to find the best companies in the world... The era of global allocation has begun.\"</p><p>On May 25, during a live broadcast of \"Cloud Conference | Global Capital Market Linkage, What is the Allocation Value of US Stocks?\" hosted by CBN, Zhang Yidong, Global Chief Strategist at Industrial Securities, shared the above views.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f539f1c96458b7ed999579cf5647d0ff\" tg-width=\"677\" tg-height=\"457\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>The following are the highlights of my investment workbook, which I would like to share with you:</p><p><b>The Federal Reserve's monetary policy framework has changed significantly, and we can no longer think with old-fashioned thinking.</b></p><p>Q: For the first time since the outbreak of the pandemic, Federal Reserve officials have discussed the possibility of tightening monetary policy. What does this mean for global markets?</p><p>Zhang Yidong: If people try to find the way forward using old maps, thinking that the Fed's tightening and bond purchases this time may lead to further tightening in the distant future, their approach is wrong. Conversely, if they conduct more in-depth research on the US stock market, they will find that the Fed's monetary policy framework has changed significantly since 2019 compared to before; it has completely changed.</p><p>Many investors, especially those in mainland China, believe that the US stock market is about to crash and the US is doomed. With inflation so high and the economy so good, the US is simply overheating. No matter how you look at it, you feel that the Federal Reserve needs to accelerate its tightening pace. But in fact, this kind of thinking is using an \"old map,\" believing that the Federal Reserve has been focusing on inflation for a long time and that focusing on inflation is better than anything else.</p><p><b>The US economy remains resilient in the second half of the year, and there is no need for stimulus policies at this time.</b></p><p>The US economy will show resilience in the second half of the year. It's not that it will suddenly jump down from eighteen floors, but rather that it will maintain a range of fluctuations, and the overall marginal growth momentum will weaken. At this point, there is no need for stimulus policies. This is the first point: the dimension of US economic growth will slow down, and the month-on-month momentum will weaken.</p><p>Secondly, in terms of the unemployment rate, the economic data for April was very good. The unemployment rate was 6.1%, slightly higher than in March, indicating a shift from simple to luxurious, and from luxurious to simple and difficult. Over the past year, the United States has experienced three rounds of massive monetary easing and bailouts. Low- and middle-income earners in the United States will take the bailout money to enjoy themselves first and spend it first. The US savings rate is still as high as 13.6%, while the historical average is 6-8%, which is its normal savings rate level. Therefore, they are not in a hurry to work or find jobs. Under these circumstances, the unemployment rate is relatively high.</p><p><b>The Fed's focus remains on employment.</b></p><p>In the second half of the year, the unemployment rate will ease because he needs to find work, and the savings rate will decline. However, the US economy won't be that bad in the second half of the year. He might be able to do odd jobs, which will make the decline in the US unemployment rate relatively smooth, rather than a rapid and steep one.</p><p>The Federal Reserve paid more attention to the unemployment rate, so much so that when the April inflation data was released, on May 12, US time, US inflation far exceeded expectations, causing an uproar in the market. At that time, many risky assets plummeted, triggering minor global turmoil that day.</p><p>However, several important figures with voting rights at the Federal Reserve, including the Fed Vice Chairman and another important official, stated that they saw the data and suggested that inflation caused by short-term transitional supply factors and employment factors were more worrying, so their focus was still on employment. Before the United States achieves full employment and before the pressure of social conflicts eases, it will be difficult for the United States to clean up its mess all at once.</p><p>US inflation peaked in the second quarter, and inflation hovered at a high level in the second half of the year.</p><p>Third, US inflation will not fall all at once in the second half of the year. Inflation will peak in the second quarter, but it may still hover at a high level in the second half of the year, requiring the Federal Reserve to control US real interest rates.</p><p><b>America buys time with money</b></p><p>Real interest rates are crucial to the recovery of the US economy, and in turn, they also play a guiding role in nominal interest rates. As you can see, everyone was very worried in mid-March, but in mid-March we clearly stated that US long-term Treasury yields would not pose a systemic risk. Against the backdrop of the current great power competition, we believe that the US is buying time with money, which is a rewriting of the American Dream. This means that whether it is the US dollar, the US dollar exchange rate, or US long-term Treasury yields, they will ultimately obey the so-called new American Dream. Money is used to buy time, time for the US economic recovery, time for the expansion of US domestic demand. Recently, whether in relations with South Korea or some other regions, the US hopes that advanced manufacturing in these regions can come to the US, buying time for manufacturing to return to the US and time for US technological innovation and upgrading.</p><p>Overall, under the current circumstances, neither employment nor inflation, nor the United States' need to enhance its competitiveness and maintain the sustainability of economic growth, are far from reaching a stage of contraction.</p><p>There are no systemic risks this year, and tightening market concerns have actually provided opportunities to invest in high-quality assets globally.</p><p>To summarize, my view is that everyone needs to see clearly the trump cards of the American elite and Powell's trump cards. Powell will be deciding on a second term next year, and under these circumstances, his focus will be more on the sustainability of economic growth and employment. That's why we say it's irreversible, and there are no systemic risks this year.</p><p>When the market is worried about tightening US policies, which will trigger global concerns, the resulting shock is a short-term disturbance. Instead, it gives us the opportunity to invest in higher-quality and more cost-effective assets globally. This is my thinking.</p><p>What impact would it have if the Federal Reserve's monetary policy shifted to tightening?</p><p>First, contraction will inevitably lead to adjustments in overvalued assets, even in a more drastic way.</p><p>Secondly, if it contracts, it will also lead to differentiation, especially for emerging markets. At that time, it is important to pay attention to the fact that the rebound of the US dollar will create a trend of suppression on commodities, which will put enormous pressure on emerging markets that rely mainly on midstream and upstream raw materials and minerals, and may even lead to debt risks and debt crises in emerging markets.</p><p>For US stocks, high valuations, especially some thematic junk stocks, will undergo a significant adjustment, and history will repeat itself. What should we focus on now? When will it actually turn?</p><p>It is unlikely that the Federal Reserve will tighten its policy this year or even in the first quarter of next year.</p><p>Before the policy shift, it was actually predictable that the Federal Reserve would guide market expectations. Moreover, before the Federal Reserve's policy, there may be other policies, including taxes.</p><p>In the second half of today, there will also be questions about whether tax increases will be approved by the State Taxation Administration, changes in taxes, bond issuance, and fiscal stimulus packages. Overall, we believe that this year and even the beginning of next year, we can basically see the Federal Reserve's trump cards clearly.</p><p>Frankly speaking, the global monetary system is still an international monetary system dominated by the US dollar. Therefore, the Federal Reserve's policy is equivalent to the master valve of global liquidity. At least in the first quarter of this year or even next year, it is difficult to see the master valve tighten.</p><p>It's even possible that the opposite could happen. If the US economy is weaker than people imagine in the second half of the year, the Federal Reserve might slightly amplify the overall valve. This would have the opposite effect, bringing better value-for-money assets worldwide, including some high-quality companies in the US stock market, European stocks, Chinese A-shares, Hong Kong stocks, and emerging market stocks.</p><p>It's okay to have a vague concept of the Fed's judgment. It's difficult to make a judgment about the general trend. It's difficult to be precise down to the month or week. We're taking it one step at a time. At least we can judge that the general trend is that we won't see the Fed tightening this year.</p><p><b>The slow and prolonged bull market in the US stock market is driven by the best companies.</b></p><p>Q: Can US stocks continue to improve? How long will it take for things to improve?</p><p>Zhang Yidong: Let's look at this from three perspectives: First, let's look at this from a structural perspective. The US stock market itself has three major indices. We often talk about the Dow Jones, Nasdaq, and S&P 500. Among these three indices, the best American companies, represented by Apple and Microsoft, mainly lead the index. Similarly, when we select the best companies in China to create an index, we are actually a super bull market.</p><p>Don't get the idea that everything in America is fine. In the US market, a large number of companies have launched, cleared, or delisted directly. A considerable number of companies have no trading volume and are like dead companies, suffering from a discount in liquidity. Therefore, in mature markets, it's truly a winner-takes-all situation. The best companies have reliable performance, and people give them valuations that match their profit growth, so we believe their sustainability is relatively long.</p><p>The US stock market itself is an index system, and its mechanism for effectively selecting the best companies is actually worth learning from. Moreover, its trading mechanism, whether it is T+0 or short selling, ensures its slow and long-term bull market, so that the best companies do not rise several times in a year or a year and a half, only to be Game over and not recover for several years.</p><p>From a structural perspective, the US stock market is driven by the best group of companies, which in turn benefit from its sound market mechanisms, trading mechanisms, and a series of market-oriented mechanisms, resulting in a very small bubble for the best group of companies.</p><p><b>Core companies in the US stock market are not expensive.</b></p><p>We often say that US-listed companies are expensive, but we can say that they are expensive from two perspectives:</p><p>First, the backbone of the US stock market, which can drive the US stock index upwards, is not expensive. It is not expensive globally, and it is not expensive compared to A-shares. On the contrary, those that are relatively weaker and more thematic are more expensive.</p><p>Secondly, because its interest rates are low, after rising for so long, the 10-year Treasury Bond yield in the US stock market is only 1.6 or 1.7. This is the first point. Looking at the structure of the US stock market, until the US substantially tightens the tap (substantial contraction), the path of the most outperforming companies in the US stock market leading the index is unlikely to end.</p><p><b>This year is not a bear market for US stocks; a bear market is definitely a global systemic risk.</b></p><p>Second, differences between countries. We believe that the US stock market is not in a bear market this year. At the end of last year, many people said they were not optimistic about the US stock market this year, but I said that the US stock market is definitely not in a bear market. If the US stock market is in a bear market at this time, it must be a global systemic risk. If the US stock market experiences a bear market this year, it will definitely be because the Federal Reserve has tightened its overall valve. This is a global systemic risk, and neither A-shares, emerging markets, nor European stock markets can withstand it.</p><p>On the second level, from a global perspective, if the United States leads a systemic tightening of the global monetary system, it may not necessarily mean that US stocks are the best performers. Since the beginning of the year, US stocks have underperformed European stock markets, and some of their indices have even underperformed relatively well-performing emerging market stock markets. As long as the US stock market is not a major bear market, but rather a bull or structural market, it presents opportunities for other global markets. This is a comparison between country markets and regional stock markets.</p><p>Third, style. Clearly, the style of US stocks this year has been that small and mid-cap stocks have outperformed large-cap stocks, and cyclical and value stocks have outperformed growth stocks. This has been the case since the beginning of the year. However, there may be changes, and the growth style may improve in the second half of the year.</p><p>From a long-term perspective, the United States is still an economy driven by technology and domestic demand. From a style perspective, its backbone is still these giants with technological innovation capabilities, which are driving the US stock market. This year, the Dow Jones, Russell 3000, and Russell 2000 have performed much better than the Nasdaq since the beginning of the year.</p><p>However, we see that US stocks are not rising and falling simultaneously; they are rising in a style, such as value stocks rising and growth stocks adjusting. Whether it's Chinese concept stocks or pure US stocks in the US, many growth-oriented stocks have actually adjusted by more than 30%-50% since the beginning of this year. Don't assume that the US stock index is very strong and ignore the professional and institutional characteristics of the US stock market. I've always said that we should focus on buying funds and investing in funds through regular fixed-amount investments, so that professional investors can participate in the US stock market. We shouldn't consider the US stock market with the mindset of speculating on A-shares or with the mindset of retail investors.</p><p><b>Three points to note when investing in QDII: Know yourself, use long-term strategies against short-term strategies, and use slow-term strategies</b></p><p>Q: What should I pay attention to when investing in QDII?</p><p>Zhang Yidong: QDII itself is a tool, a product, a product that helps enrich asset allocation. There are a few concerns:</p><p>First, understand yourself. Before understanding a product, first look at what you are like. Because not everyone can make money on certain products. For example, the products of some famous fund managers may have increased dozens of times in more than ten years, but it was useless. Holders sold them after a short while.</p><p>Some people say that buying QDII is like buying various A-share products. When I make a swing trade, I often end up losing money. Knowing yourself is very important. Your risk tolerance is different whether you should make a swing trade or just make a long-term allocation.</p><p>Second, focus on using long-term strategies to combat After buying, try to know that the QDII you are buying is in a relatively unfamiliar market outside your own circle of competence. You need to go through a relatively familiar process with the fund manager. You need to be truly professional and have a genuine understanding of the market. Recognizing that making money in the US stock market doesn't depend on timing, but on good, high-quality companies. Investing in companies when they offer suitable cost-effectiveness is ultimately a measure of value.</p><p>Third, fight fast with slow motion. Because people are interested in overseas markets, they often feel that the A-share market is hopeless and prefer to invest their money, as the returns are better than those in the A-share market. However, the style of A-shares can go crazy very quickly. Many people cut their losses when the A-share market rises, directly withdrawing their money from QDII investment.</p><p>These three points—self-awareness, using long-term skills to combat short-term skills, and using slow skills to combat fast skills—are my advice to everyone. Even if the US stock market index is doing very well, if we cannot have a clear understanding of ourselves, I suggest that everyone should rather do what they are good at than follow the crowd.</p><p>In 2007 and 2008, when QDII was very popular, many people took advantage of the hype to subscribe to QDII and lost a lot of money, cutting their losses and getting out of the market.</p><p>Therefore, when subscribing to a QDII, you need to consider the investor's asset allocation philosophy and the assessment period. Once you understand yourself, it is always a good choice. Just like financial management, you take out money that you don't need urgently in the short term and continuously invest it regularly. Your purpose is very clear: to buy some assets that are not available in the A-share market, or even through the Hong Kong Stock Connect, assets that are not even available in the Hong Kong stock market, to buy the best global core assets, not just the core assets of A-shares and Hong Kong stocks in China. This is my sharing.</p><p><b>The era of global allocation has begun; we need to find the world's best companies.</b></p><p>Q: If we want to invest in QDII, is QDII a mandatory target in our basket? Is this a very important tool for allocating assets in our basket?</p><p>Zhang Yidong: Definitely, because the world has entered an era of low growth and low interest rates, a new era of mediocrity. At this stage, we need to find the best companies in the world. In 2016, I proposed the concept of Chinese core assets. In fact, this concept can be expanded to the whole world, whether it is Europe, Japan, or the United States. We need to find the best companies globally and continuously provide assets with core competitiveness and good cost-effectiveness.</p><p>When Chinese people's social wealth has accumulated to a certain stage, and our per capita GDP has now reached $10,000, based on the experience of Europe and the United States, this is precisely the beginning of the global allocation of wealth in the United States. Based on this experience, we should start considering regular fixed-amount investments in QDII (Qualified Domestic Investment Institutions) to gradually become familiar with such excellent managers. We should not put all our energy into it at once. If we put all our energy into it, we may become disheartened and heartbroken because of a fluctuation. It is best to take it slow, using long-term investments against short-term investments and slow investments against fast investments. However, the era of global allocation has already begun.</p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzI0OTU4MTM3NQ==&mid=2247489839&idx=1&sn=bfa4c7de9db93cf496b1571b54d2223f&chksm=e98e037fdef98a691f1f72fec74fa81d0495e5508953175e31a96ce3ad949fe19ad0150a5e74&mpshare=1&scene=23&srcid=0527nkCwOi69oB7tUYWCJjNe&sharer_sharetime=1622111756938&sharer_shareid=ad9b2b8e01e45d9350b7cd98d4e88279#rd\">投资作业本</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/15e20574f8fb568333181d61bb200086","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzI0OTU4MTM3NQ==&mid=2247489839&idx=1&sn=bfa4c7de9db93cf496b1571b54d2223f&chksm=e98e037fdef98a691f1f72fec74fa81d0495e5508953175e31a96ce3ad949fe19ad0150a5e74&mpshare=1&scene=23&srcid=0527nkCwOi69oB7tUYWCJjNe&sharer_sharetime=1622111756938&sharer_shareid=ad9b2b8e01e45d9350b7cd98d4e88279#rd","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1171660212","content_text":"今年美股不是熊市，出现熊市肯定是全球性系统风险。“美联储的货币政策框架已经从2019年以后和以前大不一样，它已经完全的改变。现在很多投资者，特别是中国内地的投资者老是认为美股要崩了，美国要完蛋了，美股通胀这么高，经济又这么好，美国简直就是过热了，怎么想都觉得美联储要加快收紧的步伐，但事实上这种思考用的是一种“旧地图”，觉得美联储以前就盯住通胀，关注通胀胜于其他。”“下半年，美国经济会有一个韧性。不是说一下子从十八层楼向下跳，而是它会维持一个区间震荡，整个边际增长的动能会减弱，这个时候没有必要进行刺激政策，这是第一点，美国经济增长的维度会放缓，环比的动能会减弱。”“到了下半年，（美国）失业率的情况会缓解….. 美国这一轮失业率下行相对比较平滑，而不是快速的陡峭…..(美联储)他们的着重点还在于就业。美国实现充分就业之前，社会矛盾的压力缓解之前，美国覆水很难一下子收起来。”“美国下半年的通胀不会一下子下去，通胀的峰值在二季度，但是下半年通胀可能还在高位徘徊，需要美联储控制住美国的实际利率。”“在当前大国博弈的背景下，我们认为美国是用钱买时间，这是重新编了一个美国梦，意味着无论是美元、美元汇率还是美国长债利率最终都要服从于所谓新的美国梦，用钱来买时间，买美国经济复苏的时间，买美国内需扩张的时间，近期无论跟韩国还是一些区域，美国都希望这些区域的先进制造业能够到美国，买制造业回流美国的时间，买美国科技创新升级的时间。”“在政策转向之前，其实是可以预期的，美联储会引导市场的预期。而且在美联储的政策之前，可能还会有其他的政策，包括税收。”“美联储的政策相当于全球流动性的总阀门，这个总阀门至少今年乃至明年的一季度，我们还是很难看到收紧。”“能够推动美股指数向上涨的主心骨的这些公司并不贵，放在全球都不贵，跟A股相比也不算贵。反而相对弱的，比较偏题材性的比较贵。”“美股肯定不是熊市，这个时候美股出现熊市，一定是全球性的系统风险……只要美股不是一个大熊，它是一个偏牛或者偏结构型的市场，带来全球其他市场就有机会。”“不要以为美股指数很牛，忽略了美股市场的专业化、机构化的特征。我一直讲尽量用买基金、定投基金为主，让专业的投资者参与到美股，不要用炒A股的思路，散户化的思路考虑美股的市场。”“全球都进入到低增长、低利率的时代，是一个新平庸时代。这个阶段就要找全世界最优秀的公司……全球化配置的时代已经开始了。”5月25日，在第一财经举办的《云上会丨全球资本市场联动，美股配置价值几何？》的直播中，兴业证券全球首席策略分析师张忆东分享了上述观点。以下是投资作业本整理的精华内容，分享给大家：美联储货币政策框架已大大不同，不能用老式思维思考Q: 疫情爆发以来，美联储官员首次讨论收紧货币政策的可能性，这对全球市场意味着什么？张忆东：大家如果用老的地图试图找到未来的路，认为美联储这一次进行收缩、购债，遥远的未来有可能进一步收紧，方法是错的，反过来说，如果对于美股市场一直比较多的深入研究就会发现美联储的货币政策框架已经从2019年以后和以前大不一样，它已经完全的改变。现在很多投资者，特别是中国内地的投资者老是认为美股要崩了，美国要完蛋了，美股通胀这么高，经济又这么好，美国简直就是过热了，怎么想都觉得美联储要加快收紧的步伐，但事实上这种思考用的是一种“旧地图”，觉得美联储以前就盯住通胀，关注通胀胜于其他。下半年美国经济仍有韧性，此时无需进行刺激政策下半年，美国经济会有一个韧性。不是说一下子从十八层楼向下跳，而是它会维持一个区间震荡，整个边际增长的动能会减弱，这个时候没有必要进行刺激政策，这是第一点，美国经济增长的维度会放缓，环比的动能会减弱。第二，从失业率的维度来说，4月份经济数据非常好。失业率是6.1%，比3月份提高了一点，这就是由简入奢易，由奢入简难。过去一年的时间里，美国经历了3轮大放水，纾困，美国中低收入阶层会拿着纾困的钱先Happy，先花掉，美国的储蓄率依然高达13.6%，美国历史上的平均值是6—8%，这是它正常的储蓄率水平，所以不急于干活、找工作，这种情况下，失业率比较高。美联储重点还是关注就业到了下半年，失业率的情况会缓解，因为他要找工作，储蓄率下降。但是美国下半年的经济不会那么糟，他可能打打零工就OK了，从而使得美国这一轮失业率下行相对比较平滑，而不是快速的陡峭。美联储对于失业率的关注度更高，以至于当4月份的通胀数据出现之后，美国时间5月12号，美国通胀大超预期，市场一片哗然，当时很多风险资产暴跌，引发了那一天全球性的小小动荡。但是，立刻美联储有投票权的几个大人物，美联储的副主席包括另外一个重要的官员提出，他们看到数据，提出相比较短期过渡性的供给因素引发的通胀，就业的因素更令人担心，所以他们的着重点还在于就业。美国实现充分就业之前，社会矛盾的压力缓解之前，美国覆水很难一下子收起来。美国通胀峰值在二季度，下半年通胀高位徘徊第三，美国下半年的通胀不会一下子下去，通胀的峰值在二季度，但是下半年通胀可能还在高位徘徊，需要美联储控制住美国的实际利率。美国用钱买时间实际利率对美国经济的复苏非常重要，进而对于名义利率也有一个引导作用。你可以看到很明显，3月中旬的时候大家都很担心，但是3月中旬我们旗帜鲜明的提出美国长债收益率不会构成系统性风险，在当前大国博弈的背景下，我们认为美国是用钱买时间，这是重新编了一个美国梦，意味着无论是美元、美元汇率还是美国长债利率最终都要服从于所谓新的美国梦，用钱来买时间，买美国经济复苏的时间，买美国内需扩张的时间，近期无论跟韩国还是一些区域，美国都希望这些区域的先进制造业能够到美国，买制造业回流美国的时间，买美国科技创新升级的时间。总体来说，现在的状态下，无论是就业、通胀还是美国要增强它的竞争力，维持经济增长的持续性，都远不到收缩的阶段。今年没有系统性风险，市场担忧收紧反而给了全球布局优质资产的机会做一个总结，我的看法是大家要看清楚美国精英阶层的底牌，要看清楚鲍威尔的底牌，鲍威尔明年就要决定第二轮任期，在这种情况下，他的关注点更多在经济增长的持续性，就业的层面。所以我们说叫做覆水难收，今年没有系统性风险。当市场担心美国政策收紧，进而引发全球性担忧，这种导致的震荡是一个短期的扰动，反而给了我们在全球范围内布局更优质资产，性价比更好的资产的机会，这是我的思考。假如美联储货币政策转向收缩，会带来哪些影响？第一，收缩一定会带来高估值资产的调整，甚至是以一个比较激烈的方式调整。第二，如果收缩，也会带来分化，特别是对于新兴市场，那个时候要关注美元的反弹对于大宗商品形成一个趋势性的压制，进而那些以中上游原材料和矿产为主要支柱的新兴市场就形成了一个巨大的压力，甚至会导致新兴市场的债务风险、债务危机。对于美股而言，它里边的高估值，特别是有一些题材型的垃圾股也会有一个明显的调整，历史都会重演。我们现在要关注的是什么？它什么时候会真正的转。今年乃至明年一季度很难看到美联储政策收紧在政策转向之前，其实是可以预期的，美联储会引导市场的预期。而且在美联储的政策之前，可能还会有其他的政策，包括税收。今天下半年，也会有加税会不会被国税批准，税收的变化，以及发债，财政刺激方案。总体来说，我们认为今年乃至于明年的年初，我们基本上认为大家还可以看清楚美联储的底牌。坦率说，现在全球的货币体系依然是以美元为主导的国际货币体系，所以美联储的政策相当于全球流动性的总阀门，这个总阀门至少今年乃至明年的一季度，我们还是很难看到总阀门的收紧。甚至不排除反过来，如果下半年美国经济可能比大家想象中的弱，也有可能美联储的总阀门略微的放大一点，这会带来反过来的作用，带来全世界性价比更好的资产，包括美国股个别优质的公司，欧洲的，中国A股、中国港股，包括新兴市场的。对于美联储的判断有一个模糊的概念就OK，对大体趋势做一个判断，具体精确到月、周那很难，我们也是走一步看一步，至少我们能够判断大的趋势是今年看不到美联储收缩的动作。美股的慢牛、长牛是由最优秀的一批公司驱动的Q：美股还能继续向好吗？向好的时间有多长？张忆东：分三个方面来看这个事情：第一，从结构的角度来看这件事情。美股市场本身的结构，它有三大指数，我们动辄讲道琼斯、纳斯达克、标普，这三大指数里面主要就是苹果、微软为代表的美国最优秀的公司带着指数走。同样，我们把中国最优秀的公司筛出来做一个指数，其实我们也是超级长牛。你不要有一个想法，美国所有的都好。美国市场大量的公司推出了，清零了，直接退市了，有相当一批公司没有成交量，像死了一样，流动性折价。所以成熟市场真的是赢家通吃，最优秀的公司它的业绩靠谱，大家给他符合盈利增长相匹配的估值，所以我们认为它的持续性比较长。美股本身是指数编制，以及它能够有效的把最优秀的公司筛选出来的机制其实值得我们学习，而且它的交易机制，无论是T+0还是融券的机制，反而保证了它的慢牛，长牛，使得最优秀的公司不会是一年或者一年半涨了几倍，涨完了就Game over，好几年起不来了。从结构的角度来说，美股是最优秀的一批公司驱动的，而最优秀的公司又受益于它良好的市场机制、交易机制和市场一系列的市场化机制，使得最优秀的一批公司反而泡沫很小。美股主心骨公司并不贵我们动辄讲美股公司贵，贵从两个角度说：第一，单独拿出来美股的主心骨，能够推动美股指数向上涨的主心骨的这些公司并不贵，放在全球都不贵，跟A股相比也不算贵。反而相对弱的，比较偏题材性的比较贵。第二，因为它的利率低，涨了这么久，美股的十年期国债收益率只有1.6、1.7。这是第一点，从美股市场的结构来看在美国实质性地收紧水龙头（实质性收缩）之前，美股最牛的一批公司引领着指数走的路径还是看不到终止的。今年美股不是熊市，出现熊市肯定是全球性系统风险第二，国别之间的差异。我们认为今年美股不是熊市，去年年底，很多人说今年不看好美股，我说美股肯定不是熊市，这个时候美股出现熊市，一定是全球性的系统风险。如果今年美股出现熊市，肯定是美联储总阀门收紧了，那是全球性的系统性风险，无论是A股、新兴市场、欧洲的股市，都顶不住。第二个层面，从全球的角度来说，如果美国引领了全球货币体系不是一个系统性的收紧，不一定是美股最优秀，年初以来，美股跑输了欧洲股市，甚至它的有些指数比新兴市场相对优秀的股市表现得弱一点。只要美股不是一个大熊，它是一个偏牛或者偏结构型的市场，带来全球其他市场就有机会，这是国别市场和区域股市之间的比较。第三，风格。很明显，今年美股的风格是中小型的表现得比大型得好，周期和价值表现的比成长的风格好，这是从年初一直到现在。但是有可能会有所变化，下半年不排除成长的风格有所改善。从长期的角度来说，美国还是一个依靠科技驱动、内需驱动的经济体，从风格的角度来说，它的主心骨还是具有科技创新能力的这些巨头拖着美股走，今年的道琼斯，罗素3000、罗素2000，表现的比纳斯达克从年初到现在好很多。但是恰恰我们看到美股不是同涨同跌，它是一个风格涨，比如说价值涨，成长在调整。无论是中概股还是美股本地的纯美股，其实在今年从年初以来偏成长的很多都调了30%—50%以上，不要以为美股指数很牛，忽略了美股市场的专业化、机构化的特征。我一直讲尽量用买基金、定投基金为主，让专业的投资者参与到美股，不要用炒A股的思路，散户化的思路考虑美股的市场。投资QDII注意三点：认知自我、以长打短、以慢打快Q：投资QDII的时候需要注意什么？张忆东：QDII本身就是一种工具，是一种产品，有助于丰富资产配置的产品。有几个关注点：第一，认知自我。在认知产品之前，先看一看自己是什么样子的。因为并不是所有的人都能够在某些产品上赚钱，比如某些著名基金经理的产品可能十几年翻了几十倍，但没用，持有人拿了一会儿就卖掉了。有些人说买QDII就和买A股的各种产品一样，我做一个波段，往往就砸在手里面了。认知自我很重要，你的风险承受能力，究竟是择时做一个波段还是只是做一个长远的配置，这是不一样的。第二，关注以长打短。买了以后，尽量要知道你买的QDII是在自己能力圈以外，相对陌生的市场，对于基金管理人要有一个相对熟悉的过程，路遥知马力，真正要专业，真正对市场有认知。认知到在美股赚钱不是靠择时，而是靠好的公司，优质的公司，在它性价比合适的时候进行布局，其实还是对价值的衡量。第三，以慢打快。因为大家对海外市场感兴趣，往往是因为觉得A股没戏，喜欢把钱投出去，相比A股那边的收益率好一点。但是A股的风格一旦疯起来特别快。很多人在A股一旦起来的时候就割肉，直接把钱从QDII折腾出来。这三点，认知自我，以长打短，以慢打快是我对大家的建议。就算是美股市场指数走得很好，如果我们不能够对自我有清醒的认识，我建议大家宁可做自己擅长的事，不一定随大流。2007年、2008年，QDII非常火的时候，趁着热度认购QDII，很多人都亏了大钱，割肉出局。所以认购QDII，需要看投资者资产配置的理念和考核的期限，你要认知好自我之后，什么时候都是一个好的选择。就像理财一样，你拿出短期不需要急用的钱，不断的定期定投，你的目的很清晰，就是买一些A股没有的资产，甚至通过港股通，连港股都没有的资产，买最优秀的全球型的核心资产，不止是A股、港股中国的核心资产，这是我的分享。全球化配置时代已开启，要寻找全世界最优秀的公司Q：如果要投资QDII，QDII是不是我们这个篮子里面必须要选择的标的？是不是我们这个篮子配置资产很重要的一个抓手？张忆东：肯定是的，因为全球都进入到低增长、低利率的时代，是一个新平庸时代。这个阶段就要找全世界最优秀的公司，我在2016年提出中国核心资产这个理念，其实这个理念可以扩增到全世界，无论是欧洲、日本、美国，全球范围内寻找最优秀的公司，持续提供有核心竞争力，性价比不错的资产。当中国人的社会财富积累到了一定的阶段，现在我们的人均GDP到了1万美金，按照欧美的经验来看，恰恰是美国财富全球化配置的开端，按照这样一个经验来看，我们应该开始考虑定期定投QDII，慢慢熟悉这种优秀的管理人，不要一下子把全部的精力放上去，如果全部放上去，很可能因为一个波动灰了心，伤了心，最好慢慢来，以长打短，以慢打快，但是全球化配置的时代已经开始了。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":6662,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":131283763,"gmtCreate":1621863226252,"gmtModify":1704363464048,"author":{"id":"3536928846214760","authorId":"3536928846214760","name":"東海吉龍","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0ef8466588cf515f97a20c636e2be8a0","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3536928846214760","authorIdStr":"3536928846214760"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"666","listText":"666","text":"666","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/131283763","repostId":"1120894920","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":5703,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":133957781,"gmtCreate":1621689414443,"gmtModify":1704361490545,"author":{"id":"3536928846214760","authorId":"3536928846214760","name":"東海吉龍","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0ef8466588cf515f97a20c636e2be8a0","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3536928846214760","authorIdStr":"3536928846214760"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"666","listText":"666","text":"666","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/133957781","repostId":"1118299916","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1118299916","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1621678031,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1118299916?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-22 18:07","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Bill Gates is under investigation for \"close relationships,\" which could affect the division of his assets.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1118299916","media":"央视财经","summary":"盖茨确实在20年前有过一段婚外情。","content":"<p>After announcing their divorce, regarding Bill Gates and<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a>Reports of inappropriate relationships between female employees have been rampant. According to The Wall Street Journal, Microsoft's board of directors decided last year that Gates was no longer suitable to continue serving on the board after investigating his past close relationship with a female Microsoft employee.</p><p>A spokesperson for Gates acknowledged that he did have an extramarital affair 20 years ago, but denied that Gates' departure from the Microsoft board was directly related to the incident.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d3c235491c4dd6fdf7ee7547fb3f4ae5\" tg-width=\"649\" tg-height=\"332\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>In the United States, many large companies prohibit executives from dating their subordinates. In 2019,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MCD\">McDonald's</a>The company's former CEO was dismissed by the board of directors for having an intimate relationship with a female employee.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/48e7630ab78f177b4beef70b1b57a49e\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"328\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Recent reports could not only damage Gates' personal reputation, but also put him at a disadvantage in the division of property in the divorce case. It is reported that Gates has transferred at least $3 billion to Melinda since announcing his divorce.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9582961d249d905e99b9f1d934c13167\" tg-width=\"656\" tg-height=\"330\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>According to another report, Microsoft's current CEO Satya Nadella said on Friday that corporate executives should not abuse the power they are given. This is the first time a Microsoft executive has commented since media reports that Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates had an affair with an employee in 2000.</p><p>Since Nadella became CEO in 2014, Microsoft has not faced many controversies. Nadella is considered a thoughtful leader who helped Microsoft rebuild in the highly competitive technology industry. During this period, Nadella did not encounter many complicated problems.</p><p>But now Nadella faces a thorny problem that his predecessor (Gates) single-handedly created 20 years ago, when Nadella was just one of many vice presidents at Microsoft.</p><p>In response, Nadella said in a recent interview: \"In general, power in the workplace cannot be abused in any form. For us, the most important thing is to ensure that everyone can feel free to ask any questions they see and that we can conduct a full investigation.\"</p><p>According to a Microsoft spokesperson, in the second half of 2019, Microsoft received a report alleging that Gates had attempted to establish an intimate relationship with an employee in 2000. With the help of a law firm, Microsoft investigated the matter. Last weekend, some media reported on this investigation. Shortly before this, Gates had just announced his divorce.</p><p>In the interview, Della also stated that Microsoft has had a policy prohibiting executive misconduct since 2006. Before this, Nadella had not dealt with many difficult problems, although he had encountered some troubles.</p><p>In 2014, Nadella faced some criticism because he advised female employees not to ask for a raise. Nadella stated at the time that women would receive long-term rewards when their excellent work was recognized if they did not demand more salary from their employers. Nadella later apologized for this.</p><p>In 2019, Nadella defended the move after some employees protested Microsoft's contract to provide augmented reality (AR) headsets to the U.S. military. He said, \"We have made a principled decision that we will not refuse to provide technology to our democratically elected institutions to protect the freedoms we enjoy.\"</p>","source":"YSCJ","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Bill Gates is under investigation for \"close relationships,\" which could affect the division of his assets.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBill Gates is under investigation for \"close relationships,\" which could affect the division of his assets.\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">央视财经</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-05-22 18:07</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>After announcing their divorce, regarding Bill Gates and<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a>Reports of inappropriate relationships between female employees have been rampant. According to The Wall Street Journal, Microsoft's board of directors decided last year that Gates was no longer suitable to continue serving on the board after investigating his past close relationship with a female Microsoft employee.</p><p>A spokesperson for Gates acknowledged that he did have an extramarital affair 20 years ago, but denied that Gates' departure from the Microsoft board was directly related to the incident.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d3c235491c4dd6fdf7ee7547fb3f4ae5\" tg-width=\"649\" tg-height=\"332\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>In the United States, many large companies prohibit executives from dating their subordinates. In 2019,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MCD\">McDonald's</a>The company's former CEO was dismissed by the board of directors for having an intimate relationship with a female employee.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/48e7630ab78f177b4beef70b1b57a49e\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"328\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Recent reports could not only damage Gates' personal reputation, but also put him at a disadvantage in the division of property in the divorce case. It is reported that Gates has transferred at least $3 billion to Melinda since announcing his divorce.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9582961d249d905e99b9f1d934c13167\" tg-width=\"656\" tg-height=\"330\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>According to another report, Microsoft's current CEO Satya Nadella said on Friday that corporate executives should not abuse the power they are given. This is the first time a Microsoft executive has commented since media reports that Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates had an affair with an employee in 2000.</p><p>Since Nadella became CEO in 2014, Microsoft has not faced many controversies. Nadella is considered a thoughtful leader who helped Microsoft rebuild in the highly competitive technology industry. During this period, Nadella did not encounter many complicated problems.</p><p>But now Nadella faces a thorny problem that his predecessor (Gates) single-handedly created 20 years ago, when Nadella was just one of many vice presidents at Microsoft.</p><p>In response, Nadella said in a recent interview: \"In general, power in the workplace cannot be abused in any form. For us, the most important thing is to ensure that everyone can feel free to ask any questions they see and that we can conduct a full investigation.\"</p><p>According to a Microsoft spokesperson, in the second half of 2019, Microsoft received a report alleging that Gates had attempted to establish an intimate relationship with an employee in 2000. With the help of a law firm, Microsoft investigated the matter. Last weekend, some media reported on this investigation. Shortly before this, Gates had just announced his divorce.</p><p>In the interview, Della also stated that Microsoft has had a policy prohibiting executive misconduct since 2006. Before this, Nadella had not dealt with many difficult problems, although he had encountered some troubles.</p><p>In 2014, Nadella faced some criticism because he advised female employees not to ask for a raise. Nadella stated at the time that women would receive long-term rewards when their excellent work was recognized if they did not demand more salary from their employers. Nadella later apologized for this.</p><p>In 2019, Nadella defended the move after some employees protested Microsoft's contract to provide augmented reality (AR) headsets to the U.S. military. He said, \"We have made a principled decision that we will not refuse to provide technology to our democratically elected institutions to protect the freedoms we enjoy.\"</p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"https://finance.sina.com.cn/stock/usstock/c/2021-05-22/doc-ikmyaawc6885660.shtml\">央视财经</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f5f084842fb3799c40f34178d55cdc2f","relate_stocks":{"MSFT":"微软"},"source_url":"https://finance.sina.com.cn/stock/usstock/c/2021-05-22/doc-ikmyaawc6885660.shtml","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1118299916","content_text":"宣布离婚后，关于比尔·盖茨与微软女员工存在不当关系的报道就层出不穷。据《华尔街日报》报道称，微软董事会对盖茨和一名微软女员工曾经的亲密关系进行调查后，在去年做出决定，认为盖茨不再适合继续在董事会任职。一名盖茨的发言人承认，盖茨确实在20年前有过一段婚外情，不过否认了盖茨离开微软董事会与这一事件的直接关系。在美国，不少大型公司都禁止高管与下属恋爱，2019年，麦当劳公司前CEO就因为与一名女员工存在亲密关系而被董事会解聘。近期的报道不仅可能有损盖茨的个人名誉，也可能使其在离婚官司的财产分割中陷于不利。据悉，在宣布离婚后，盖茨已经向梅琳达转账至少30亿美元。另据报道，微软现任CEO萨蒂亚·纳德拉（Satya Nadella）周五表示，企业高管不应滥用其被赋予的权力。这是在媒体报道微软联合创始人比尔·盖茨（Bill Gates）在2000年与一名员工有染后，微软高管首次发表评论。自纳德拉2014年出任CEO以来，微软并未面临太多争议。纳德拉被认为是一位深思熟虑的领导者，在竞争激烈的科技行业，他帮助微软重振旗鼓。期间，纳德拉并未遭遇太多复杂的问题。但如今，纳德拉却面临一个棘手的问题，他的前任（盖茨）在20年前一手酿成的，当时纳德拉只是微软公司众多副总裁之中的一位。对此，纳德拉日前在接受采访时表示：“总的来说，职场的权力不能以任何形式被滥用。对我们来说，最重要的是确保每个人都能放心地提出他们看到的任何问题，并让我们能够对此进行全面调查。”据微软发言人称，2019年下半年，微软收到一份报告，称盖茨在2000年曾试图与一名员工建立亲密关系。在一家律师事务所的帮助下，微软对此进行了调查。上周末，有媒体报道了这项调查。而此之前不久，盖茨刚刚宣布离婚。德拉在采访中还表示，自2006年以来，微软一直有禁止高管不当行为的政策。在此之前，纳德拉并未处理过太多棘手的问题，尽管他也遭遇过一些麻烦。2014年，纳德拉曾面临一些批评，因为他建议女性员工别要求加薪。纳德拉当时称，如果女性不向雇主索要更多薪水，那么当她们的优异工作得到认可时，也会得到长期的奖励。后来，纳德拉对此进行了道歉。2019年，在一些员工抗议微软向美国军队提供增强现实（AR）头盔的合同后，纳德拉为这一举动进行了辩护。他说：“我们做出了一个原则性的决定，我们不会拒绝向我们民主选举的机构提供技术，以保护我们享有的自由。”","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"MSFT":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":6263,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":191045748,"gmtCreate":1620830207184,"gmtModify":1704349069331,"author":{"id":"3536928846214760","authorId":"3536928846214760","name":"東海吉龍","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0ef8466588cf515f97a20c636e2be8a0","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3536928846214760","authorIdStr":"3536928846214760"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"666","listText":"666","text":"666","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/191045748","repostId":"1123721888","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1123721888","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"为用户提供金融资讯、行情、数据，旨在帮助投资者理解世界，做投资决策。","home_visible":1,"media_name":"老虎资讯综合","id":"102","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1620812439,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1123721888?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-12 17:40","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Tiger Brokers has been included in the MSCI China All Equity Index!","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1123721888","media":"老虎资讯综合","summary":"此次被纳入MSCI意味着国际资本市场对老虎证券的认可和信心！","content":"<p>On May 11, MSCI, an international index provider, released its quarterly index adjustment results for May.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TIGR\">Tiger Brokers</a>It will be included in the MSCI China All Shares Index, effective after the market closes on May 27.</p><p>Tiger Brokers founder and CEO Wu Tianhua stated, \"Tiger Brokers' inclusion in the MSCI China All Equity Index represents international market recognition and confidence in our long-term investment value and development prospects. Tiger Brokers' mission is to make investing better through technology. Through continuous technological iteration, we are committed to providing investors with a more efficient, convenient, and smooth one-stop global investment experience.\" As Tiger enters countries and regions such as Singapore and the United States, we look forward to serving even more global users.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6cac618ec6413c15fd5aad09ee702621\" tg-width=\"405\" tg-height=\"720\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">MSCI is currently the world's most important index company, compiling hundreds of indices for various markets around the world, which are used as investment benchmarks and tracked by numerous international institutions and investors. Since launching its first index in 1969, MSCI has primarily provided products and services such as indices, risk portfolio and performance analysis tools, and corporate governance tools, tailored to different countries and regions, market sizes, industries, and investment methods. With approximately $10 trillion in global assets benchmarked against the MSCI index, 97 of the world's top 100 largest asset managers are MSCI clients. Pensions in the United States that hold 95% of their investment interests are benchmarked by MSCI.</p><p>The MSCI China All Shares Index, compiled by Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI), is the most important component of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. According to MSCI's index adjustment methodology, companies that can be included in its index system generally have to meet a series of requirements, including total market capitalization, free-float market capitalization, liquidity, and trading hours.</p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e8f2f148520e460cb20ee263c4b5fd2f\" tg-width=\"830\" tg-height=\"536\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>MSCI official website</span></p><p>Historical performance of the MSCI China All Shares Index:</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6c5df675372dbd49e16da8a583e0f650\" tg-width=\"830\" tg-height=\"426\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">According to MSCI's quarterly adjustment results, the MSCI China All Stock Index added 60 stocks and removed 26 stocks. So what does being on the list mean for Tiger?</p><p>This signifies that the international capital market's recognition and confidence in Tiger Brokers will help further expand the company's influence in the international capital market and enhance the internationalization level of its shareholders.</p><p>According to MSCI estimates, trillions of dollars worldwide track emerging market indices, including both active and passive funds, with passive funds investing in the MSCI China All Equity Index. Once stocks are included in the index, passive investors will allocate these newly added constituent stocks proportionally.</p><p>View details:</p><p><a href=\"https://www.msci.com/eqb/gimi/stdindex/MSCI_May21_ChinaAllShares_PublicList.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Explanation of Adjustments to MSCI China Index Constituents</a></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tiger Brokers has been included in the MSCI China All Equity Index!</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTiger Brokers has been included in the MSCI China All Equity Index!\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/102\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">老虎资讯综合 </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-05-12 17:40</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>On May 11, MSCI, an international index provider, released its quarterly index adjustment results for May.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TIGR\">Tiger Brokers</a>It will be included in the MSCI China All Shares Index, effective after the market closes on May 27.</p><p>Tiger Brokers founder and CEO Wu Tianhua stated, \"Tiger Brokers' inclusion in the MSCI China All Equity Index represents international market recognition and confidence in our long-term investment value and development prospects. Tiger Brokers' mission is to make investing better through technology. Through continuous technological iteration, we are committed to providing investors with a more efficient, convenient, and smooth one-stop global investment experience.\" As Tiger enters countries and regions such as Singapore and the United States, we look forward to serving even more global users.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6cac618ec6413c15fd5aad09ee702621\" tg-width=\"405\" tg-height=\"720\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">MSCI is currently the world's most important index company, compiling hundreds of indices for various markets around the world, which are used as investment benchmarks and tracked by numerous international institutions and investors. Since launching its first index in 1969, MSCI has primarily provided products and services such as indices, risk portfolio and performance analysis tools, and corporate governance tools, tailored to different countries and regions, market sizes, industries, and investment methods. With approximately $10 trillion in global assets benchmarked against the MSCI index, 97 of the world's top 100 largest asset managers are MSCI clients. Pensions in the United States that hold 95% of their investment interests are benchmarked by MSCI.</p><p>The MSCI China All Shares Index, compiled by Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI), is the most important component of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. According to MSCI's index adjustment methodology, companies that can be included in its index system generally have to meet a series of requirements, including total market capitalization, free-float market capitalization, liquidity, and trading hours.</p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e8f2f148520e460cb20ee263c4b5fd2f\" tg-width=\"830\" tg-height=\"536\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>MSCI official website</span></p><p>Historical performance of the MSCI China All Shares Index:</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6c5df675372dbd49e16da8a583e0f650\" tg-width=\"830\" tg-height=\"426\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">According to MSCI's quarterly adjustment results, the MSCI China All Stock Index added 60 stocks and removed 26 stocks. So what does being on the list mean for Tiger?</p><p>This signifies that the international capital market's recognition and confidence in Tiger Brokers will help further expand the company's influence in the international capital market and enhance the internationalization level of its shareholders.</p><p>According to MSCI estimates, trillions of dollars worldwide track emerging market indices, including both active and passive funds, with passive funds investing in the MSCI China All Equity Index. Once stocks are included in the index, passive investors will allocate these newly added constituent stocks proportionally.</p><p>View details:</p><p><a href=\"https://www.msci.com/eqb/gimi/stdindex/MSCI_May21_ChinaAllShares_PublicList.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Explanation of Adjustments to MSCI China Index Constituents</a></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9e4b807dafecc161ebbd0d3c42055f20","relate_stocks":{"TIGR":"老虎证券"},"is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1123721888","content_text":"5月11日消息，国际指数编制公司MSCI公布5月指数季度调整结果，其中，老虎证券获纳入MSCI中国全股票指数（MSCI China All Shares Index），将于5月27日收盘后生效。老虎证券创始人及CEO巫天华表示：“老虎证券获纳入MSCI中国全股票指数代表国际市场对我们长期投资价值和发展前景的认可和信心。老虎证券的使命是科技让投资更美好。通过不断技术迭代，我们致力于为投资者提供更高效、便捷、流畅的一站式全球投资体验。随着老虎进入新加坡，美国等国家和地区，我们期待服务更多全球用户。”MSCI（明晟）是目前全球最重要的指数公司，编制数百种全球各个市场的指数，被大量国际机构，投资者作为投资基准并跟踪。从 1969年发布第一只指数至今，MSCI按照国家和区域、市场规模大小、行业及投资方式的不同，主要提供指数、风险组合和业绩分析工具以及公司治理工具等产品和服务。全球约10万亿美元的资产以MSCI指数为基准，全球前100个最大资产管理者中，97个都是MSCI的客户。美国95%的投资权益的养老金以MSCI为基准。MSCI中国全股票指数(MSCI China All Shares Index)由摩根士丹利资本国际(MSCI)编制，是 MSCI新兴市场指数中最重要的组成部分。根据 MSCI指数的调整方法，能被纳入到其指数体系的公司一般要满足总市值、自由流通市值、流动性和交易时间等一系列要求。MSCI官网明晟中国全股票指数(MSCI China All Shares Index)历史表现：根据MSCI发布的季度调整结果， MSCI中国全股票指数本次新增60只个股，剔除26只股票。那么，上榜对于老虎意味着什么呢？意味着国际资本市场对老虎证券的认可和信心，有助于进一步扩大公司国际资本市场影响力、提升公司股东国际化水平。据 MSCI估算，全球数以万亿美元的资金跟踪新兴市场指数，其中既包含了主动型资金，又包含了被动型基金，被动型资金以明晟中国全股票指数作为投资标的。当股票被纳入指数后，被动型投资者会按比例配置新增这些成份股。详情查看：MSCI中国指数成分股调整说明","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TIGR":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":7404,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":190552224,"gmtCreate":1620637306668,"gmtModify":1704345913235,"author":{"id":"3536928846214760","authorId":"3536928846214760","name":"東海吉龍","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0ef8466588cf515f97a20c636e2be8a0","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3536928846214760","authorIdStr":"3536928846214760"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"666","listText":"666","text":"666","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/190552224","repostId":"2134638173","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2134638173","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1620634320,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2134638173?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-10 16:12","market":"sh","language":"zh","title":"Zhongtai International: Biden's proposal on vaccine patents has limited short-term impact","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2134638173","media":"中泰金融国际","summary":"拜登转向支持WTO对放弃新冠疫苗知识产权保护的倡议，我们认为短期影响有限\n美国总统拜登日前提出将支持世界贸易组织(WTO)的要求疫苗企业放弃新冠疫苗专利的提案，导致全球疫苗企业股价波动。根据多家权威媒","content":"<p>Biden has shifted his support to the WTO's initiative to waive intellectual property protection for COVID-19 vaccines, which we believe will have limited short-term impact.</p><p>US President Biden's recent proposal to support the World Trade Organization's (WTO) proposal requiring vaccine companies to relinquish their COVID-19 vaccine patents has caused stock prices of global vaccine companies to fluctuate. According to multiple authoritative media reports, 100 WTO member states have already supported the proposal. U.S. Trade Representative Ditch stated that the U.S. will actively support the text negotiations held at the WTO to achieve the above goals, but the negotiations will take time.</p><p>Currently, Germany and Switzerland have expressed their opposition. Considering that if approved, it will affect the revenue of the leading pharmaceutical group and affect the enthusiasm for vaccine research and development, we expect the negotiations to take time. We believe that if the proposal is ultimately approved, it will affect the performance of some original vaccine research companies in the long run. However, due to the high technical barriers to COVID-19 vaccines, and the fact that drugs and vaccines require long-term clinical trials before they are launched on the market, there are only a limited number of qualified manufacturers. Therefore, obtaining a patent does not mean that you can immediately imitate it. Therefore, we believe that even if the proposal is passed, the impact on vaccine companies in the short term will be limited.</p><p>Regarding domestically produced vaccines, the WHO is currently evaluating the inactivated vaccines produced by Sinopharm Group Beijing Biological Products and Sinovac Biotech. Based on currently publicly available data, clinical data on these two vaccines is insufficient in people over 60 years old and patients with underlying diseases (such as hypertension, diabetes, and obesity) due to a lack of cases. However, they have shown good efficacy in young and middle-aged people aged 18-59. We will pay attention to the WHO's evaluation results in the near future.</p><p>In addition, regarding<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/600196\">Fosun Pharma</a>Regarding the approval status of the participating FubiTai vaccine in Mainland China, management stated that it is currently at the end of Phase II clinical trials, and a marketing application can be submitted after the completion of Phase II clinical trials. As the product has already been approved by the WHO and is widely used in Hong Kong, we do not expect that the approval in China will take much time.</p><p>According to the earlier agreement,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/02196\">Fosun Pharma</a>In 2021, Fosun Pharma will purchase at least 100 million doses of FubiTai vaccine from Biontech, and Fosun Pharma will have the joint development and commercialization rights of FubiTai vaccine in mainland China, Hong Kong and Macau. We have not yet obtained information from the Chinese government regarding the procurement price and procurement model of the Fosun Pharma vaccine. However, if we refer to the US government's procurement price of US$19.50 per dose (approximately RMB 126) and calculate based on a procurement volume of 100 million doses, Fosun Pharma will generate revenue of over RMB 10 billion. According to the previous agreement, depending on the procurement model, Fosun Pharma will receive 60% or 65% of FubiTai's gross profit from sales in China, Hong Kong and Macau. Therefore, if we calculate based on the gross profit margin of more than 80% of listed vaccine companies, if the vaccine approval and sales proceed smoothly, Fosun Pharma will receive considerable revenue.</p><p>According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Fubitai is as effective as 95% in preventing COVID-19, and 94% in people over 65 years of age. Based on good clinical data, we are optimistic about the demand prospects of FubiTai vaccine in mainland China. In the future, we will pay attention to the approval status, purchase price and purchase mode of this product in mainland China to estimate its specific profit contribution to the company.</p><p>Continue to recommend high-quality innovative drugs and leading companies in the biotechnology sector.</p><p>We expect that if the FubiTai vaccine is approved in China,<b>Fosun Pharma (02196)</b>The benefits of this vaccine will gradually become clear. We estimate that as many details remain unclear, current market forecasts for Fosun Pharma may not fully reflect the contribution of the vaccine. We recommend paying attention to the progress of FubiTai's approval in mainland China. In addition, judging from the pharmaceutical companies that have released their first-quarter reports, most of them performed well in the first quarter, and we still recommend leading companies in the innovative drug and CXO sectors. In addition, we believe that if the epidemic situation in India, a major API producer, continues to worsen, it will continue to push up API prices. Domestic API industry leaders<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/03933\">Federal Pharmaceutical</a>(03933) will benefit.</p><p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/01093\">CSPC Pharmaceutical</a></b>Judging from the list of drugs involved in the fifth batch of volume-based procurement circulating online recently, the company's products are less affected. We expect the company to perform well in the first quarter, and the company's innovative anti-infective drug amphotericin B was just approved in early April. In the future, we will also submit a marketing application for the lung cancer drug EGFR-TKI inhibitor as soon as possible, and the demand outlook is expected to be good. The company will actively promote its listing on the Science and Technology Innovation Board. If approved, it will strengthen the company's financial strength. We maintain our \"buy\" rating and target price of HK$11.52.</p><p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WX\">WuXi AppTec</a></b>The company's first-quarter revenue increased by 55.3% year-on-year to RMB 4.95 billion, shareholders' net profit increased by 394.9% year-on-year to approximately RMB 1.5 billion, while adjusted Non-IFRS net profit, which reflects the company's core net profit, increased by 63.6% year-on-year to approximately RMB 940 million, demonstrating the continued rapid growth of the China business. Due to the very successful \"long tail strategy\" of the company, the number of customers continues to grow, the number of small molecule drug research and development and outsourcing services (CDMO) projects is increasing rapidly, and as the epidemic recovers, clinical trials and other CRO businesses are also recovering. It is expected that the US business will gradually recover as the epidemic eases. We expect revenue CAGR of 31.0% in 2020-23E and adjusted Non-IFRS net profit CAGR of 30.1%, giving us an \"Overweight\" rating and a target price of HK$206.2.</p><p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/01801\">Innovent Biotechnology</a></b>The company's main product, Daboshu, performed well in sales in the first quarter. As the product was approved for the treatment of first-line non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in February, the marketing application for the treatment of first-line hepatocellular carcinoma and EGFR-positive lung cancer resistant to TKI preparations has also been accepted by the National Medical Products Administration. We expect sales to maintain rapid growth, with a CAGR of 24.0% in 2020-23E. In addition to Daboshu, the company's oncology drugs Dayoutong (bevacizumab), Dabohua (rituximab) and Sulixin are all new products that were just approved for marketing in 2020 and are in a period of sales increase. We expect revenue from pharmaceutical sales business to increase from approximately RMB2.37 billion in 2020 to RMB6.12 billion, representing a CAGR of 37.2% in 2020-23E. We reiterate our \"Buy\" rating with a target price of HK$102.1.</p><p><b>Federal Pharmaceutical</b>The company is a leader in the domestic intermediate and API industry. In recent years, insulin has led the company to transform into a specialty drug manufacturer. According to our understanding, the sales revenue of the company's main third-generation insulin product, insulin glargine, maintained rapid growth in the first quarter of 2021. It is expected that the blockbuster new drug insulin aspart may be approved within the year. If approved, it is expected to become a catalyst for the stock price. If the epidemic in India continues, it will also push up the price of raw materials. We reiterate our \"buy\" rating and target price of HK$8.</p><p><b>Risk Warning</b>：</p><p>1) The Chinese government's approval progress for the FubiTai vaccine is slower than expected or the purchase price is lower than expected;</p><p>2) The impact of policy regulations such as volume-based procurement in the pharmaceutical industry is greater than expected;</p><p>3) The research and development and sales progress of innovative drug companies is slower than expected.</p>","source":"lsy1597304098211","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Zhongtai International: Biden's proposal on vaccine patents has limited short-term impact</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nZhongtai International: Biden's proposal on vaccine patents has limited short-term impact\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">中泰金融国际</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-05-10 16:12</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Biden has shifted his support to the WTO's initiative to waive intellectual property protection for COVID-19 vaccines, which we believe will have limited short-term impact.</p><p>US President Biden's recent proposal to support the World Trade Organization's (WTO) proposal requiring vaccine companies to relinquish their COVID-19 vaccine patents has caused stock prices of global vaccine companies to fluctuate. According to multiple authoritative media reports, 100 WTO member states have already supported the proposal. U.S. Trade Representative Ditch stated that the U.S. will actively support the text negotiations held at the WTO to achieve the above goals, but the negotiations will take time.</p><p>Currently, Germany and Switzerland have expressed their opposition. Considering that if approved, it will affect the revenue of the leading pharmaceutical group and affect the enthusiasm for vaccine research and development, we expect the negotiations to take time. We believe that if the proposal is ultimately approved, it will affect the performance of some original vaccine research companies in the long run. However, due to the high technical barriers to COVID-19 vaccines, and the fact that drugs and vaccines require long-term clinical trials before they are launched on the market, there are only a limited number of qualified manufacturers. Therefore, obtaining a patent does not mean that you can immediately imitate it. Therefore, we believe that even if the proposal is passed, the impact on vaccine companies in the short term will be limited.</p><p>Regarding domestically produced vaccines, the WHO is currently evaluating the inactivated vaccines produced by Sinopharm Group Beijing Biological Products and Sinovac Biotech. Based on currently publicly available data, clinical data on these two vaccines is insufficient in people over 60 years old and patients with underlying diseases (such as hypertension, diabetes, and obesity) due to a lack of cases. However, they have shown good efficacy in young and middle-aged people aged 18-59. We will pay attention to the WHO's evaluation results in the near future.</p><p>In addition, regarding<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/600196\">Fosun Pharma</a>Regarding the approval status of the participating FubiTai vaccine in Mainland China, management stated that it is currently at the end of Phase II clinical trials, and a marketing application can be submitted after the completion of Phase II clinical trials. As the product has already been approved by the WHO and is widely used in Hong Kong, we do not expect that the approval in China will take much time.</p><p>According to the earlier agreement,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/02196\">Fosun Pharma</a>In 2021, Fosun Pharma will purchase at least 100 million doses of FubiTai vaccine from Biontech, and Fosun Pharma will have the joint development and commercialization rights of FubiTai vaccine in mainland China, Hong Kong and Macau. We have not yet obtained information from the Chinese government regarding the procurement price and procurement model of the Fosun Pharma vaccine. However, if we refer to the US government's procurement price of US$19.50 per dose (approximately RMB 126) and calculate based on a procurement volume of 100 million doses, Fosun Pharma will generate revenue of over RMB 10 billion. According to the previous agreement, depending on the procurement model, Fosun Pharma will receive 60% or 65% of FubiTai's gross profit from sales in China, Hong Kong and Macau. Therefore, if we calculate based on the gross profit margin of more than 80% of listed vaccine companies, if the vaccine approval and sales proceed smoothly, Fosun Pharma will receive considerable revenue.</p><p>According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Fubitai is as effective as 95% in preventing COVID-19, and 94% in people over 65 years of age. Based on good clinical data, we are optimistic about the demand prospects of FubiTai vaccine in mainland China. In the future, we will pay attention to the approval status, purchase price and purchase mode of this product in mainland China to estimate its specific profit contribution to the company.</p><p>Continue to recommend high-quality innovative drugs and leading companies in the biotechnology sector.</p><p>We expect that if the FubiTai vaccine is approved in China,<b>Fosun Pharma (02196)</b>The benefits of this vaccine will gradually become clear. We estimate that as many details remain unclear, current market forecasts for Fosun Pharma may not fully reflect the contribution of the vaccine. We recommend paying attention to the progress of FubiTai's approval in mainland China. In addition, judging from the pharmaceutical companies that have released their first-quarter reports, most of them performed well in the first quarter, and we still recommend leading companies in the innovative drug and CXO sectors. In addition, we believe that if the epidemic situation in India, a major API producer, continues to worsen, it will continue to push up API prices. Domestic API industry leaders<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/03933\">Federal Pharmaceutical</a>(03933) will benefit.</p><p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/01093\">CSPC Pharmaceutical</a></b>Judging from the list of drugs involved in the fifth batch of volume-based procurement circulating online recently, the company's products are less affected. We expect the company to perform well in the first quarter, and the company's innovative anti-infective drug amphotericin B was just approved in early April. In the future, we will also submit a marketing application for the lung cancer drug EGFR-TKI inhibitor as soon as possible, and the demand outlook is expected to be good. The company will actively promote its listing on the Science and Technology Innovation Board. If approved, it will strengthen the company's financial strength. We maintain our \"buy\" rating and target price of HK$11.52.</p><p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WX\">WuXi AppTec</a></b>The company's first-quarter revenue increased by 55.3% year-on-year to RMB 4.95 billion, shareholders' net profit increased by 394.9% year-on-year to approximately RMB 1.5 billion, while adjusted Non-IFRS net profit, which reflects the company's core net profit, increased by 63.6% year-on-year to approximately RMB 940 million, demonstrating the continued rapid growth of the China business. Due to the very successful \"long tail strategy\" of the company, the number of customers continues to grow, the number of small molecule drug research and development and outsourcing services (CDMO) projects is increasing rapidly, and as the epidemic recovers, clinical trials and other CRO businesses are also recovering. It is expected that the US business will gradually recover as the epidemic eases. We expect revenue CAGR of 31.0% in 2020-23E and adjusted Non-IFRS net profit CAGR of 30.1%, giving us an \"Overweight\" rating and a target price of HK$206.2.</p><p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/01801\">Innovent Biotechnology</a></b>The company's main product, Daboshu, performed well in sales in the first quarter. As the product was approved for the treatment of first-line non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in February, the marketing application for the treatment of first-line hepatocellular carcinoma and EGFR-positive lung cancer resistant to TKI preparations has also been accepted by the National Medical Products Administration. We expect sales to maintain rapid growth, with a CAGR of 24.0% in 2020-23E. In addition to Daboshu, the company's oncology drugs Dayoutong (bevacizumab), Dabohua (rituximab) and Sulixin are all new products that were just approved for marketing in 2020 and are in a period of sales increase. We expect revenue from pharmaceutical sales business to increase from approximately RMB2.37 billion in 2020 to RMB6.12 billion, representing a CAGR of 37.2% in 2020-23E. We reiterate our \"Buy\" rating with a target price of HK$102.1.</p><p><b>Federal Pharmaceutical</b>The company is a leader in the domestic intermediate and API industry. In recent years, insulin has led the company to transform into a specialty drug manufacturer. According to our understanding, the sales revenue of the company's main third-generation insulin product, insulin glargine, maintained rapid growth in the first quarter of 2021. It is expected that the blockbuster new drug insulin aspart may be approved within the year. If approved, it is expected to become a catalyst for the stock price. If the epidemic in India continues, it will also push up the price of raw materials. We reiterate our \"buy\" rating and target price of HK$8.</p><p><b>Risk Warning</b>：</p><p>1) The Chinese government's approval progress for the FubiTai vaccine is slower than expected or the purchase price is lower than expected;</p><p>2) The impact of policy regulations such as volume-based procurement in the pharmaceutical industry is greater than expected;</p><p>3) The research and development and sales progress of innovative drug companies is slower than expected.</p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"http://www.zhitongcaijing.com/content/detail/470973.html\">中泰金融国际</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e559c5a8390713a5a8d4b07a2667368d","relate_stocks":{"02196":"复星医药","BNTX":"BioNTech SE"},"source_url":"http://www.zhitongcaijing.com/content/detail/470973.html","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2134638173","content_text":"拜登转向支持WTO对放弃新冠疫苗知识产权保护的倡议，我们认为短期影响有限\n美国总统拜登日前提出将支持世界贸易组织(WTO)的要求疫苗企业放弃新冠疫苗专利的提案，导致全球疫苗企业股价波动。根据多家权威媒体报道，目前已有100个WTO成员国支持该提案，美国贸易代表戴琪表示，美方将积极支持世贸组织举行的文本谈判以促成上述目标，但是谈判需 要时间。\n目前来看，德国与瑞士已表示反对。考虑到如果获批将影响龙头制药集团收入并影响 疫苗研发热情等原因，我们预计谈判需要时间。我们认为如果提议最终获批，长远将影响部分 疫苗原研企业的业绩，但是由于新冠疫苗技术壁垒很高，而且药品与疫苗上市前都需进行长时 间临床试验，符合要求的生产厂商也有限，因此并非获得专利就能马上仿制，因此我们认为就 算提案通过，短期内对疫苗企业的影响也有限。\n国产疫苗方面，世卫组织目前正在评估国药集团北京生物与科兴中维生产的灭活疫苗，从目前公开的数据看，这两种疫苗在60 岁以上老年人以及基础疾病患者(如高血压、糖尿病、肥胖等)方面由于缺少病例，临床数据还不充分，但是对于18-59 岁的中青年则表现出良好效力，我们近期将关注世卫组织的评估结果。\n另外，关于复星医药参与的复必泰疫苗在中国大陆的审批情况，管理层表示目前处于二期临床的尾声，二期临床完成后即可提交上市申请，由于产品已经在世卫组织获批而且于香港广为 使用，我们预计中国审批不会需要太多时间。\n按照早前协议,复星医药2021 年向Biontech采购至少1亿剂复必泰疫苗，复星医药将拥有复必泰疫苗在中国大陆、香港与澳门的共同开发及商业化权利。我们尚未获取中国政府关于复必泰疫苗的采购价及采购模式方面 的信息，但是如果参考美国政府19.5 美元/剂(约126 元人民币)的采购价，按照1亿剂采购量计算，复星医药将获得超100亿人民币的收入。按照早前的协议，按照不同的采购模式，复星医药将获得复必泰在中国、香港及澳门销售毛利的60%或65%，因此如果按照通常疫苗上市 企业80%以上的毛利率推算，如疫苗审批与销售情况顺利，复星医药将获得可观收入。\n根据美国国家疾控中心(CDC)资料，复必泰在防止新 冠方面的有效率高达95%，对于65 岁以上老人的有效率为94%。基于良好的临床数据，我们看好复必泰疫苗在中国大陆的需求前景，未来将关注这个产品在中国大陆的审批情况、采购价 及采购模式等具体信息以推算对公司具体的利润贡献。\n继续推荐优质创新药及生物科技板块龙头企业\n我们预计如复必泰疫苗在中国获批，复星医药(02196)在这个疫苗上的收益将逐步明朗化。我们估计由于许多细节尚未明朗，目前市场对于复星医药的预测未必完全反应疫苗的贡献，我们 建议关注复必泰在内地审批的进度。除此以外，从目前已公布一季报的医药企业看，大部分企业一季度经营情况良好，我们仍然推荐创新药与CXO 板块龙头。另外，我们认为如原料药生产大国印度疫情持续恶化，将继续推升原料药价格，国内原料药行业龙头联邦制药(03933)将受益。\n石药集团：从近期网络流传的第五批带量采购涉及药物名单看，公司产品受影响较 小。我们预计公司一季度经营情况良好，而且公司创新药抗感染药物两性霉素B于4月初刚刚获 批，未来也将尽快提交肺癌药物肺癌药物三EGFR-TKI 抑制剂的上市申请，预计需求前景良好。公司将积极推进科创板上市，如获批将夯实公司资金实力，维持“买入”评级与11.52 港元目标价。\n药明康德：公司一季度收入同比增长55.3%至49.5亿元人民币，股东净利润同比增 长394.9%至约15亿元，而反映公司核心净利润的经调整Non-IFRS 净利润则同比增长63.6% 至约9.4亿元，中国业务引领业绩持续快速增长。由于公司“长尾战略”非常成功客户数量不断 增长，小分子药品研发与外包服务(CDMO)项目数量快速增加，而随着疫情的恢复临床试验与其 他CRO 业务也在恢复，预计美国业务随着疫情舒缓也将逐步恢复。我们预计2020-23E收入CAGR 为31.0%,经调整Non-IFRS 净利润CAGR 为30.1%，给予“增持”评级和206.2 港元目标价。\n信达生物:公司主要产品达伯舒一季度销售表现良好。由于产品于2 月获批用于一线 非鳞状非小细胞肺癌治疗，目前用于一线肝细胞癌与TKI 制剂耐药的EGFR 阳性肺癌治疗的上市申 请也已经获得国家药监局受理，我们预计销售将维持快速增长，2020-23E CAGR 为24.0%。除达伯舒 以外，公司的肿瘤药达莜同(贝伐珠单抗)、达伯华(利妥昔单抗)与苏立信均为2020 年刚刚获批 上市的新产品，处于销售放量期。我们预计医药销售业务的收入将从2020年的约23.7亿人民币增加到61.2亿人民币，2020-23E CAGR为37.2%。我们重申“买入”评级102.1 港元目标价。\n联邦制药:公司是国内中间体与原料药行业龙头，近年来胰岛素引领公司转型成为专科 药生产商。根据我们的了解，公司三代胰岛素主力产品甘精胰岛素销售收入2021 年一季度维持快速 增长，而预计重磅新药门冬胰岛素可能于年内获批，预计如获批将成为股价催化剂，印度疫情如持续也将推升原料药价格，我们重申“买入”评级与8港元目标价。\n风险提示：\n1)中国政府对复必泰疫苗的审批进度慢于预期或采购价低于预期;\n2)药品行业带量采购等政策调控影响大于预期;\n3)创新药企业研发与销售进度慢于预期。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"02196":0.9,"BNTX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4550,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":104068993,"gmtCreate":1620345931912,"gmtModify":1704342217749,"author":{"id":"3536928846214760","authorId":"3536928846214760","name":"東海吉龍","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0ef8466588cf515f97a20c636e2be8a0","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3536928846214760","authorIdStr":"3536928846214760"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"666","listText":"666","text":"666","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/104068993","repostId":"2133691576","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2133691576","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"为用户提供金融资讯、行情、数据，旨在帮助投资者理解世界，做投资决策。","home_visible":1,"media_name":"老虎资讯综合","id":"102","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1620333000,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2133691576?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-07 04:30","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Dropbox reported first-quarter revenue of $510 million, with net profit up 21% year-over-year.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2133691576","media":"老虎资讯综合","summary":"5月7日，云存储服务提供商Dropbox美股盘后公布了该公司的2021财年第一季度财报。报告显示，Dropbox第一季度总营收为5.116亿美元，与上年同期的4.550亿美元相比增长12%，不计入汇率","content":"<p>On May 7, cloud storage service providers<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMC\">Dropbox</a>The company released its financial results for the first quarter of fiscal year 2021 after the US stock market closed. The report shows that Dropbox's total revenue for the first quarter was $511.6 million, a 12% increase compared to $455 million in the same period last year, and an 11% year-over-year increase excluding the impact of currency fluctuations. Net income was $47.6 million, a 21% increase compared to a net income of $39.3 million in the same period last year; Non-GAAP adjusted net income was $141.8 million, compared with $69.8 million in the same period last year.</p><p>Dropbox's first-quarter revenue and adjusted earnings per share both exceeded Wall Street analysts' expectations, driving its stock price up nearly 2% in after-hours trading.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7cdec3e6dcc56ee4828167017836a71e\" tg-width=\"1302\" tg-height=\"833\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>First Quarter Results Summary:</b></p><p>Dropbox's total revenue for the first quarter was $511.6 million, a 12% increase compared to $455 million in the same period last year, and an 11% increase year-over-year excluding the impact of currency fluctuations, exceeding Wall Street analysts' expectations. according to<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/YHOO\">Yahoo</a>Data provided by the financial channel shows that nine analysts had previously expected Dropbox's total revenue to reach $505.18 million in the first quarter.</p><p>According to U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, Dropbox's net profit for the first quarter was $47.6 million, a 21% increase compared to a net profit of $39.3 million in the same period last year. Excluding certain one-time items (not in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles), Dropbox's adjusted net income for the first quarter was $141.8 million, compared to $69.8 million in the same period last year.</p><p>Under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, Dropbox's diluted earnings per share attributable to common shareholders for the first quarter were $0.12, compared to $0.09 in the same period last year. Excluding certain one-time items (not in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles), Dropbox's diluted earnings per share attributable to common shareholders for the first quarter were $0.35, compared to $0.17 in the same period last year, which also exceeded Wall Street analysts' expectations. according to<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/YHOO\">Yahoo</a>Data provided by the financial channel shows that 10 analysts had previously expected Dropbox's adjusted earnings per share to reach $0.30 in the first quarter.</p><p>Dropbox reported a gross profit of $402.3 million in the first quarter, compared to $351.9 million in the same period last year. Dropbox reported operating profit of $42.5 million in the first quarter, compared to $26.8 million in the same period last year.</p><p>Dropbox's total operating expenses for the first quarter were $359.8 million, compared to $325.1 million in the same period last year. Of this, R&D expenditure was US$181.2 million, compared to US$181.8 million in the same period of the previous year; Sales and marketing expenses were $102.7 million, compared to $104.3 million in the same period last year; General and administrative expenses amounted to $58.6 million, compared to $39 million in the same period of the previous year; Impairment charges related to real estate assets amounted to $17.3 million, compared to no such charge in the same period last year.</p><p>As of the end of the first quarter, Dropbox's total ARR (accounting rate of return, a method of measuring profitability) was $2.112 billion, a 13% increase compared to the same period last year. Excluding the impact of currency fluctuations, Dropbox's total ARR as of the end of the first quarter increased by $60.5 million compared to the previous quarter, representing a 12% increase compared to the same period last year.</p><p>As of the end of the first quarter, Dropbox had 15.83 million paying users, compared to 14.59 million at the end of the first quarter of fiscal year 2020. The average revenue per paying user was $132.55, compared to $126.30 in the same period last year.</p><p>According to U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, Dropbox's gross profit margin for the first quarter was 78.6%, compared to 77.3% in the same period last year. Excluding certain one-time items (not in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles), Dropbox's gross margin for the first quarter was 80.2%, compared to 78.3% in the same period last year.</p><p>According to U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, Dropbox's operating profit margin for the first quarter was 8.3%, compared to 5.9% in the same period last year. Excluding certain one-time items (not in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles), Dropbox's operating profit margin for the first quarter was 29.1%, compared to 16.1% in the same period last year.</p><p>Dropbox's net cash from operating activities in the first quarter was $115.7 million, compared to $53.3 million in the same period last year. Dropbox's operating cash flow for the first quarter was $108.8 million, compared to $25.5 million in the same period last year.</p><p>As of the end of the first quarter, Dropbox held $1.916 billion in cash and cash equivalents, as well as short-term investments.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Dropbox reported first-quarter revenue of $510 million, with net profit up 21% year-over-year.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDropbox reported first-quarter revenue of $510 million, with net profit up 21% year-over-year.\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/102\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">老虎资讯综合 </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-05-07 04:30</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>On May 7, cloud storage service providers<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMC\">Dropbox</a>The company released its financial results for the first quarter of fiscal year 2021 after the US stock market closed. The report shows that Dropbox's total revenue for the first quarter was $511.6 million, a 12% increase compared to $455 million in the same period last year, and an 11% year-over-year increase excluding the impact of currency fluctuations. Net income was $47.6 million, a 21% increase compared to a net income of $39.3 million in the same period last year; Non-GAAP adjusted net income was $141.8 million, compared with $69.8 million in the same period last year.</p><p>Dropbox's first-quarter revenue and adjusted earnings per share both exceeded Wall Street analysts' expectations, driving its stock price up nearly 2% in after-hours trading.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7cdec3e6dcc56ee4828167017836a71e\" tg-width=\"1302\" tg-height=\"833\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>First Quarter Results Summary:</b></p><p>Dropbox's total revenue for the first quarter was $511.6 million, a 12% increase compared to $455 million in the same period last year, and an 11% increase year-over-year excluding the impact of currency fluctuations, exceeding Wall Street analysts' expectations. according to<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/YHOO\">Yahoo</a>Data provided by the financial channel shows that nine analysts had previously expected Dropbox's total revenue to reach $505.18 million in the first quarter.</p><p>According to U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, Dropbox's net profit for the first quarter was $47.6 million, a 21% increase compared to a net profit of $39.3 million in the same period last year. Excluding certain one-time items (not in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles), Dropbox's adjusted net income for the first quarter was $141.8 million, compared to $69.8 million in the same period last year.</p><p>Under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, Dropbox's diluted earnings per share attributable to common shareholders for the first quarter were $0.12, compared to $0.09 in the same period last year. Excluding certain one-time items (not in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles), Dropbox's diluted earnings per share attributable to common shareholders for the first quarter were $0.35, compared to $0.17 in the same period last year, which also exceeded Wall Street analysts' expectations. according to<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/YHOO\">Yahoo</a>Data provided by the financial channel shows that 10 analysts had previously expected Dropbox's adjusted earnings per share to reach $0.30 in the first quarter.</p><p>Dropbox reported a gross profit of $402.3 million in the first quarter, compared to $351.9 million in the same period last year. Dropbox reported operating profit of $42.5 million in the first quarter, compared to $26.8 million in the same period last year.</p><p>Dropbox's total operating expenses for the first quarter were $359.8 million, compared to $325.1 million in the same period last year. Of this, R&D expenditure was US$181.2 million, compared to US$181.8 million in the same period of the previous year; Sales and marketing expenses were $102.7 million, compared to $104.3 million in the same period last year; General and administrative expenses amounted to $58.6 million, compared to $39 million in the same period of the previous year; Impairment charges related to real estate assets amounted to $17.3 million, compared to no such charge in the same period last year.</p><p>As of the end of the first quarter, Dropbox's total ARR (accounting rate of return, a method of measuring profitability) was $2.112 billion, a 13% increase compared to the same period last year. Excluding the impact of currency fluctuations, Dropbox's total ARR as of the end of the first quarter increased by $60.5 million compared to the previous quarter, representing a 12% increase compared to the same period last year.</p><p>As of the end of the first quarter, Dropbox had 15.83 million paying users, compared to 14.59 million at the end of the first quarter of fiscal year 2020. The average revenue per paying user was $132.55, compared to $126.30 in the same period last year.</p><p>According to U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, Dropbox's gross profit margin for the first quarter was 78.6%, compared to 77.3% in the same period last year. Excluding certain one-time items (not in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles), Dropbox's gross margin for the first quarter was 80.2%, compared to 78.3% in the same period last year.</p><p>According to U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, Dropbox's operating profit margin for the first quarter was 8.3%, compared to 5.9% in the same period last year. Excluding certain one-time items (not in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles), Dropbox's operating profit margin for the first quarter was 29.1%, compared to 16.1% in the same period last year.</p><p>Dropbox's net cash from operating activities in the first quarter was $115.7 million, compared to $53.3 million in the same period last year. Dropbox's operating cash flow for the first quarter was $108.8 million, compared to $25.5 million in the same period last year.</p><p>As of the end of the first quarter, Dropbox held $1.916 billion in cash and cash equivalents, as well as short-term investments.</p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3a51a02ea9a24f4d4f0b9e4e8e4c6bc7","relate_stocks":{"DBX":"Dropbox Inc."},"is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2133691576","content_text":"5月7日，云存储服务提供商Dropbox美股盘后公布了该公司的2021财年第一季度财报。报告显示，Dropbox第一季度总营收为5.116亿美元，与上年同期的4.550亿美元相比增长12%，不计入汇率变动的影响为同比增长11%；净利润为4760万美元，与上年同期的净利润3930万美元相比增长21%；不按照美国通用会计准则的调整后净利润为1.418亿美元，相比之下上年同期为6980万美元。\nDropbox第一季度营收和调整后每股收益均超出华尔街分析师预期，从而推动其盘后股价上涨近2%。\n\n第一季度业绩概要：\nDropbox第一季度总营收为5.116亿美元，与上年同期的4.550亿美元相比增长12%，不计入汇率变动的影响为同比增长11%，这一业绩超出华尔街分析师预期。据雅虎财经频道提供的数据显示，9名分析师此前平均预期Dropbox第一季度总营收将达5.0518亿美元。\n按照美国通用会计准则，Dropbox第一季度净利润为4760万美元，与上年同期的净利润3930万美元相比增长21%。不计入某些一次性项目（不按照美国通用会计准则），Dropbox第一季度的调整后净利润为1.418亿美元，相比之下上年同期为6980万美元。\n按照美国通用会计准则，Dropbox第一季度归属于普通股股东的每股摊薄收益为0.12美元，相比之下去年同期为0.09美元。不计入某些一次性项目（不按照美国通用会计准则），Dropbox第一季度归属于普通股股东的每股摊薄收益为0.35美元，相比之下去年同期为0.17美元，这一业绩也超出华尔街分析师预期。据雅虎财经频道提供的数据显示，10名分析师此前平均预期Dropbox第一季度调整后每股收益将达0.3美元。\nDropbox第一季度毛利润为4.023亿美元，相比之下上年同期的毛利润为3.519亿美元。Dropbox第一季度运营利润为4250万美元，相比之下上年同期为2680万美元。\nDropbox第一季度总运营支出为3.598亿美元，相比之下上年同期为3.251亿美元。其中，研发支出为1.812亿美元，相比之下上年同期为1.818亿美元；销售和营销支出为1.027亿美元，相比之下上年同期为1.043亿美元；总务和行政支出为5860万美元，相比之下上年同期为3900万美元；与不动产资产相关的减值支出为1730万美元，而上年同期并无这项支出。\n截至第一季度末，Dropbox的总ARR（会计收益率法，一种衡量盈利性的方法）为21.12亿美元，与上年同期相比增长13%。不计入汇率变动影响，Dropbox截至第一季度末的总ARR与上一季度相比增长6050万美元，与上年同期相比增长12%。\n截至第一季度末，Dropbox的付费用户人数为1583万人，相比之下截至2020财年第一季度末为1459万人；平均每付费用户收入为132.55美元，相比之下上年同期为126.30美元。\n按照美国通用会计准则，Dropbox第一季度毛利率为78.6%，相比之下上年同期为77.3%。不计入某些一次性项目（不按照美国通用会计准则），Dropbox第一季度毛利率为80.2%，相比之下上年同期为78.3%。\n按照美国通用会计准则，Dropbox第一季度运营利润率为8.3%，相比之下上年同期为5.9%。不计入某些一次性项目（不按照美国通用会计准则），Dropbox第一季度运营利润率为29.1%，相比之下上年同期为16.1%。\nDropbox第一季度来自于业务运营活动的净现金为1.157亿美元，相比之下上年同期为5330万美元。Dropbox第一季度运营现金流为1.088亿美元，相比之下上年同期为2550万美元。\n截至第一季度末，Dropbox所持现金和现金等价物以及短期投资总额为19.16亿美元。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"DBX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":6990,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":104061675,"gmtCreate":1620345903697,"gmtModify":1704342216448,"author":{"id":"3536928846214760","authorId":"3536928846214760","name":"東海吉龍","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0ef8466588cf515f97a20c636e2be8a0","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3536928846214760","authorIdStr":"3536928846214760"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"666","listText":"666","text":"666","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/104061675","repostId":"2133691576","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2133691576","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"为用户提供金融资讯、行情、数据，旨在帮助投资者理解世界，做投资决策。","home_visible":1,"media_name":"老虎资讯综合","id":"102","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1620333000,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2133691576?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-07 04:30","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Dropbox reported first-quarter revenue of $510 million, with net profit up 21% year-over-year.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2133691576","media":"老虎资讯综合","summary":"5月7日，云存储服务提供商Dropbox美股盘后公布了该公司的2021财年第一季度财报。报告显示，Dropbox第一季度总营收为5.116亿美元，与上年同期的4.550亿美元相比增长12%，不计入汇率","content":"<p>On May 7, cloud storage service providers<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMC\">Dropbox</a>The company released its financial results for the first quarter of fiscal year 2021 after the US stock market closed. The report shows that Dropbox's total revenue for the first quarter was $511.6 million, a 12% increase compared to $455 million in the same period last year, and an 11% year-over-year increase excluding the impact of currency fluctuations. Net income was $47.6 million, a 21% increase compared to a net income of $39.3 million in the same period last year; Non-GAAP adjusted net income was $141.8 million, compared with $69.8 million in the same period last year.</p><p>Dropbox's first-quarter revenue and adjusted earnings per share both exceeded Wall Street analysts' expectations, driving its stock price up nearly 2% in after-hours trading.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7cdec3e6dcc56ee4828167017836a71e\" tg-width=\"1302\" tg-height=\"833\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>First Quarter Results Summary:</b></p><p>Dropbox's total revenue for the first quarter was $511.6 million, a 12% increase compared to $455 million in the same period last year, and an 11% increase year-over-year excluding the impact of currency fluctuations, exceeding Wall Street analysts' expectations. according to<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/YHOO\">Yahoo</a>Data provided by the financial channel shows that nine analysts had previously expected Dropbox's total revenue to reach $505.18 million in the first quarter.</p><p>According to U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, Dropbox's net profit for the first quarter was $47.6 million, a 21% increase compared to a net profit of $39.3 million in the same period last year. Excluding certain one-time items (not in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles), Dropbox's adjusted net income for the first quarter was $141.8 million, compared to $69.8 million in the same period last year.</p><p>Under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, Dropbox's diluted earnings per share attributable to common shareholders for the first quarter were $0.12, compared to $0.09 in the same period last year. Excluding certain one-time items (not in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles), Dropbox's diluted earnings per share attributable to common shareholders for the first quarter were $0.35, compared to $0.17 in the same period last year, which also exceeded Wall Street analysts' expectations. according to<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/YHOO\">Yahoo</a>Data provided by the financial channel shows that 10 analysts had previously expected Dropbox's adjusted earnings per share to reach $0.30 in the first quarter.</p><p>Dropbox reported a gross profit of $402.3 million in the first quarter, compared to $351.9 million in the same period last year. Dropbox reported operating profit of $42.5 million in the first quarter, compared to $26.8 million in the same period last year.</p><p>Dropbox's total operating expenses for the first quarter were $359.8 million, compared to $325.1 million in the same period last year. Of this, R&D expenditure was US$181.2 million, compared to US$181.8 million in the same period of the previous year; Sales and marketing expenses were $102.7 million, compared to $104.3 million in the same period last year; General and administrative expenses amounted to $58.6 million, compared to $39 million in the same period of the previous year; Impairment charges related to real estate assets amounted to $17.3 million, compared to no such charge in the same period last year.</p><p>As of the end of the first quarter, Dropbox's total ARR (accounting rate of return, a method of measuring profitability) was $2.112 billion, a 13% increase compared to the same period last year. Excluding the impact of currency fluctuations, Dropbox's total ARR as of the end of the first quarter increased by $60.5 million compared to the previous quarter, representing a 12% increase compared to the same period last year.</p><p>As of the end of the first quarter, Dropbox had 15.83 million paying users, compared to 14.59 million at the end of the first quarter of fiscal year 2020. The average revenue per paying user was $132.55, compared to $126.30 in the same period last year.</p><p>According to U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, Dropbox's gross profit margin for the first quarter was 78.6%, compared to 77.3% in the same period last year. Excluding certain one-time items (not in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles), Dropbox's gross margin for the first quarter was 80.2%, compared to 78.3% in the same period last year.</p><p>According to U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, Dropbox's operating profit margin for the first quarter was 8.3%, compared to 5.9% in the same period last year. Excluding certain one-time items (not in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles), Dropbox's operating profit margin for the first quarter was 29.1%, compared to 16.1% in the same period last year.</p><p>Dropbox's net cash from operating activities in the first quarter was $115.7 million, compared to $53.3 million in the same period last year. Dropbox's operating cash flow for the first quarter was $108.8 million, compared to $25.5 million in the same period last year.</p><p>As of the end of the first quarter, Dropbox held $1.916 billion in cash and cash equivalents, as well as short-term investments.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Dropbox reported first-quarter revenue of $510 million, with net profit up 21% year-over-year.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDropbox reported first-quarter revenue of $510 million, with net profit up 21% year-over-year.\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/102\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">老虎资讯综合 </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-05-07 04:30</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>On May 7, cloud storage service providers<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMC\">Dropbox</a>The company released its financial results for the first quarter of fiscal year 2021 after the US stock market closed. The report shows that Dropbox's total revenue for the first quarter was $511.6 million, a 12% increase compared to $455 million in the same period last year, and an 11% year-over-year increase excluding the impact of currency fluctuations. Net income was $47.6 million, a 21% increase compared to a net income of $39.3 million in the same period last year; Non-GAAP adjusted net income was $141.8 million, compared with $69.8 million in the same period last year.</p><p>Dropbox's first-quarter revenue and adjusted earnings per share both exceeded Wall Street analysts' expectations, driving its stock price up nearly 2% in after-hours trading.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7cdec3e6dcc56ee4828167017836a71e\" tg-width=\"1302\" tg-height=\"833\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>First Quarter Results Summary:</b></p><p>Dropbox's total revenue for the first quarter was $511.6 million, a 12% increase compared to $455 million in the same period last year, and an 11% increase year-over-year excluding the impact of currency fluctuations, exceeding Wall Street analysts' expectations. according to<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/YHOO\">Yahoo</a>Data provided by the financial channel shows that nine analysts had previously expected Dropbox's total revenue to reach $505.18 million in the first quarter.</p><p>According to U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, Dropbox's net profit for the first quarter was $47.6 million, a 21% increase compared to a net profit of $39.3 million in the same period last year. Excluding certain one-time items (not in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles), Dropbox's adjusted net income for the first quarter was $141.8 million, compared to $69.8 million in the same period last year.</p><p>Under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, Dropbox's diluted earnings per share attributable to common shareholders for the first quarter were $0.12, compared to $0.09 in the same period last year. Excluding certain one-time items (not in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles), Dropbox's diluted earnings per share attributable to common shareholders for the first quarter were $0.35, compared to $0.17 in the same period last year, which also exceeded Wall Street analysts' expectations. according to<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/YHOO\">Yahoo</a>Data provided by the financial channel shows that 10 analysts had previously expected Dropbox's adjusted earnings per share to reach $0.30 in the first quarter.</p><p>Dropbox reported a gross profit of $402.3 million in the first quarter, compared to $351.9 million in the same period last year. Dropbox reported operating profit of $42.5 million in the first quarter, compared to $26.8 million in the same period last year.</p><p>Dropbox's total operating expenses for the first quarter were $359.8 million, compared to $325.1 million in the same period last year. Of this, R&D expenditure was US$181.2 million, compared to US$181.8 million in the same period of the previous year; Sales and marketing expenses were $102.7 million, compared to $104.3 million in the same period last year; General and administrative expenses amounted to $58.6 million, compared to $39 million in the same period of the previous year; Impairment charges related to real estate assets amounted to $17.3 million, compared to no such charge in the same period last year.</p><p>As of the end of the first quarter, Dropbox's total ARR (accounting rate of return, a method of measuring profitability) was $2.112 billion, a 13% increase compared to the same period last year. Excluding the impact of currency fluctuations, Dropbox's total ARR as of the end of the first quarter increased by $60.5 million compared to the previous quarter, representing a 12% increase compared to the same period last year.</p><p>As of the end of the first quarter, Dropbox had 15.83 million paying users, compared to 14.59 million at the end of the first quarter of fiscal year 2020. The average revenue per paying user was $132.55, compared to $126.30 in the same period last year.</p><p>According to U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, Dropbox's gross profit margin for the first quarter was 78.6%, compared to 77.3% in the same period last year. Excluding certain one-time items (not in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles), Dropbox's gross margin for the first quarter was 80.2%, compared to 78.3% in the same period last year.</p><p>According to U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, Dropbox's operating profit margin for the first quarter was 8.3%, compared to 5.9% in the same period last year. Excluding certain one-time items (not in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles), Dropbox's operating profit margin for the first quarter was 29.1%, compared to 16.1% in the same period last year.</p><p>Dropbox's net cash from operating activities in the first quarter was $115.7 million, compared to $53.3 million in the same period last year. Dropbox's operating cash flow for the first quarter was $108.8 million, compared to $25.5 million in the same period last year.</p><p>As of the end of the first quarter, Dropbox held $1.916 billion in cash and cash equivalents, as well as short-term investments.</p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3a51a02ea9a24f4d4f0b9e4e8e4c6bc7","relate_stocks":{"DBX":"Dropbox Inc."},"is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2133691576","content_text":"5月7日，云存储服务提供商Dropbox美股盘后公布了该公司的2021财年第一季度财报。报告显示，Dropbox第一季度总营收为5.116亿美元，与上年同期的4.550亿美元相比增长12%，不计入汇率变动的影响为同比增长11%；净利润为4760万美元，与上年同期的净利润3930万美元相比增长21%；不按照美国通用会计准则的调整后净利润为1.418亿美元，相比之下上年同期为6980万美元。\nDropbox第一季度营收和调整后每股收益均超出华尔街分析师预期，从而推动其盘后股价上涨近2%。\n\n第一季度业绩概要：\nDropbox第一季度总营收为5.116亿美元，与上年同期的4.550亿美元相比增长12%，不计入汇率变动的影响为同比增长11%，这一业绩超出华尔街分析师预期。据雅虎财经频道提供的数据显示，9名分析师此前平均预期Dropbox第一季度总营收将达5.0518亿美元。\n按照美国通用会计准则，Dropbox第一季度净利润为4760万美元，与上年同期的净利润3930万美元相比增长21%。不计入某些一次性项目（不按照美国通用会计准则），Dropbox第一季度的调整后净利润为1.418亿美元，相比之下上年同期为6980万美元。\n按照美国通用会计准则，Dropbox第一季度归属于普通股股东的每股摊薄收益为0.12美元，相比之下去年同期为0.09美元。不计入某些一次性项目（不按照美国通用会计准则），Dropbox第一季度归属于普通股股东的每股摊薄收益为0.35美元，相比之下去年同期为0.17美元，这一业绩也超出华尔街分析师预期。据雅虎财经频道提供的数据显示，10名分析师此前平均预期Dropbox第一季度调整后每股收益将达0.3美元。\nDropbox第一季度毛利润为4.023亿美元，相比之下上年同期的毛利润为3.519亿美元。Dropbox第一季度运营利润为4250万美元，相比之下上年同期为2680万美元。\nDropbox第一季度总运营支出为3.598亿美元，相比之下上年同期为3.251亿美元。其中，研发支出为1.812亿美元，相比之下上年同期为1.818亿美元；销售和营销支出为1.027亿美元，相比之下上年同期为1.043亿美元；总务和行政支出为5860万美元，相比之下上年同期为3900万美元；与不动产资产相关的减值支出为1730万美元，而上年同期并无这项支出。\n截至第一季度末，Dropbox的总ARR（会计收益率法，一种衡量盈利性的方法）为21.12亿美元，与上年同期相比增长13%。不计入汇率变动影响，Dropbox截至第一季度末的总ARR与上一季度相比增长6050万美元，与上年同期相比增长12%。\n截至第一季度末，Dropbox的付费用户人数为1583万人，相比之下截至2020财年第一季度末为1459万人；平均每付费用户收入为132.55美元，相比之下上年同期为126.30美元。\n按照美国通用会计准则，Dropbox第一季度毛利率为78.6%，相比之下上年同期为77.3%。不计入某些一次性项目（不按照美国通用会计准则），Dropbox第一季度毛利率为80.2%，相比之下上年同期为78.3%。\n按照美国通用会计准则，Dropbox第一季度运营利润率为8.3%，相比之下上年同期为5.9%。不计入某些一次性项目（不按照美国通用会计准则），Dropbox第一季度运营利润率为29.1%，相比之下上年同期为16.1%。\nDropbox第一季度来自于业务运营活动的净现金为1.157亿美元，相比之下上年同期为5330万美元。Dropbox第一季度运营现金流为1.088亿美元，相比之下上年同期为2550万美元。\n截至第一季度末，Dropbox所持现金和现金等价物以及短期投资总额为19.16亿美元。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"DBX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":5075,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":105814116,"gmtCreate":1620288877035,"gmtModify":1704341380288,"author":{"id":"3536928846214760","authorId":"3536928846214760","name":"東海吉龍","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0ef8466588cf515f97a20c636e2be8a0","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3536928846214760","authorIdStr":"3536928846214760"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"666","listText":"666","text":"666","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/105814116","repostId":"1180972135","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":5232,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":108049131,"gmtCreate":1619966745623,"gmtModify":1704336845529,"author":{"id":"3536928846214760","authorId":"3536928846214760","name":"東海吉龍","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0ef8466588cf515f97a20c636e2be8a0","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3536928846214760","authorIdStr":"3536928846214760"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"66666","listText":"66666","text":"66666","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/108049131","repostId":"2132182593","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":7209,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":108054251,"gmtCreate":1619966313173,"gmtModify":1704336841241,"author":{"id":"3536928846214760","authorId":"3536928846214760","name":"東海吉龍","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0ef8466588cf515f97a20c636e2be8a0","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3536928846214760","authorIdStr":"3536928846214760"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"666","listText":"666","text":"666","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/108054251","repostId":"2132567538","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2132567538","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1619941518,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2132567538?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-02 15:45","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Was the US GDP relatively strong or weak in the first quarter?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2132567538","media":"智通财经网","summary":"本文来自“申万宏源宏观”。摘要一、周观点：美国一季度GDP究竟是偏强还是偏弱?21Q1美国GDP同比0.4%，略低于市场预期。美国21Q1  GDP实际同比0.4%，疫情以来首次同比转正，环比1.6%","content":"<p><b>This article is from \"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/000166\">Shenwan Hongyuan</a>\"Macroeconomic\".</b></p><p>Abstract</p><p><b>I. Weekly Viewpoint: Was the US Q1 GDP relatively strong or weak?</b></p><p><b>The US GDP grew by 0.4% year-on-year in Q1 2021, slightly lower than market expectations.</b>The US GDP grew 0.4% year-on-year in real terms in Q1 2021, turning positive year-on-year for the first time since the pandemic, and 1.6% month-on-month. The main contributing factors were goods consumption, service consumption, and non-residential investment, demonstrating the rapid recovery of the US economy under the improvement of the pandemic and fiscal subsidies. However, the main drags were changes in private inventories and imports. In fact, the US GDP growth rate in the first quarter was slightly lower than market expectations, indicating insufficient market awareness of the slow recovery of production caused by excessive fiscal subsidies in the US, as well as overly optimistic expectations for the improvement of the pandemic.</p><p><b>Consumer spending: Subsidies boost commodity consumption, and the pandemic eases the recovery of the service sector.</b>1) In Q1 2021, U.S. personal consumption expenditures contributed 1.1 percentage points to GDP year-on-year, a significant improvement of 3 percentage points compared to Q4 2020. Commodity consumption is mainly driven by durable goods, while service consumption has a greater impact on GDP growth than durable goods consumption. 2) From a monthly high-frequency perspective, PCE in March was 8.5% year-on-year and 3.7% month-on-month, strengthening again after a slight decline during the direct subsidy vacuum in February. This demonstrates the immediate stimulating effect of the $1,400 subsidy in March on consumption, as well as the recovery of service consumption after the relaxation of prevention and control measures. However, in terms of the strength of the recovery in service consumption, it was actually slightly weaker than the overly optimistic expectations of overseas markets in February and March.</p><p><b>Investment: Equipment investment improved significantly, interest rates suppressed real estate investment, and inventory replenishment did not occur.</b>In Q1 2021, domestic private investment contributed 0.8 percentage points to GDP year-on-year, a slight improvement of 0.1 percentage points compared to the fourth quarter. 1) Improved non-residential investment indicates that the U.S. manufacturing sector's expectations for the economic outlook have improved; 2) The decline in the year-on-year contribution of private inventory changes to GDP in Q1 2021 reflects the supply-demand gap in the US economy. Strong demand but slow production recovery lead to a decline in inventories. This means that the strength of commodity prices in Q1 cannot be supported by the logic of strong US industrial production and proactive inventory replenishment. 3) The year-on-year contribution of residential investment to GDP remained basically stable, while the month-on-month growth rate was suppressed by the overall rise in US interest rates in the previous period. It is expected to continue to cool down as interest rates rise in the medium term.</p><p><b>Government spending and net exports: Subsidies have driven up government spending, while the widening supply-demand gap has led to high import growth.</b>The supply-demand gap in the US economy has further deepened the drag on GDP from net exports. In Q1 2021, net exports dragged down GDP by 2 percentage points year-on-year, an increase of 0.7 percentage points compared to Q4 2020. Government spending contributed 0.1 percentage points to GDP year-on-year in Q1 2021, mainly due to the U.S. government's direct subsidy checks to the banking system for residents and the cost of purchasing vaccines.</p><p><b>The US economic recovery is expected to peak in the second quarter, and attention should be paid to the subsequent developments of the pandemic.</b>We believe the strength of the future U.S. economic recovery will depend on the vaccination process and the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic. Assuming that the US pandemic continues to ease and the service sector gradually recovers, the second quarter is expected to be the peak of the US economic recovery. However, the supply-demand gap caused by excessive subsidies will continue until September, and the strength of the US economic recovery this year may not be as strong as the market expects. Personal consumption expenditures: The first quarter is expected to be the peak of goods consumption, and service sector consumption will continue to gradually recover as the pandemic eases. However, the spread of more contagious virus variants in the United States and overseas countries will also affect the strength of the subsequent service sector recovery. Investment: The improvement of non-residential investment requires attention to the subsequent progress of the pandemic. Residential investment will decline as the real estate market gradually cools down; Changes in private inventories may not improve until unemployment benefits end in September. Government spending and net exports: Government spending is expected to continue to make a positive year-on-year contribution to GDP until the fourth quarter. Net exports will return to normal levels as the supply-demand gap narrows later this year.</p><p><b>II. Global Macro Data</b></p><p><b>This week's high-frequency data</b>New orders for U.S. durable goods rose both year-on-year and month-on-month.</p><p><b>epidemic</b>The number of new confirmed cases in the United States has decreased.</p><p><b>Demand</b>Retail sales in Japan rebounded significantly year-on-year.</p><p><b>Supply and Employment</b>New orders for durable goods in the United States rose both year-on-year and month-on-month.</p><p><b>Trade</b>U.S. imports and exports both rose significantly year-on-year in March.</p><p><b>Inflation and commodities</b>Oil prices rose slightly.</p><p><b>Real Estate</b>The U.S. existing home sales index rose in March.</p><p><b>Monetary policy and exchange rates</b>the US Dollar Index fell, while gold prices remained stable.</p><p><b>Global Macro Calendar</b>Focus on the US ISM Manufacturing PMI</p><p>text</p><p><b>I. Weekly Viewpoint: Was the US Q1 GDP relatively strong or weak?</b></p><p><b>US GDP grew 0.4% year-on-year in Q1, slightly lower than market expectations.</b></p><p>The US GDP grew by 0.4% year-on-year in real terms in Q1 2021, turning positive year-on-year for the first time since the pandemic, and by 1.6% month-on-month. The main contributing factors were goods consumption, service consumption, and non-residential investment, demonstrating the relatively rapid recovery of the US economy under the improvement of the pandemic and fiscal subsidies. The main drags were changes in private inventories and imports. In fact, the US GDP growth rate in the first quarter was slightly lower than market expectations, indicating insufficient market awareness of the slow production recovery caused by excessive fiscal subsidies in the US, as well as overly optimistic expectations for the improvement of the pandemic.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/867b3b31bf5a4410ca85884cf283ce1f.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"588\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>2. Consumer spending: Subsidies boost commodity consumption, and the pandemic eases the recovery of the service sector.</b></p><p>In Q1 2021, government subsidies of up to $2,000 per person boosted consumer spending; The easing of the pandemic has driven the recovery of service consumption, but it is slightly weaker than the initial optimistic expectations of overseas markets. 1) From a quarterly perspective, US personal consumption expenditures contributed 1.1 percentage points to GDP year-on-year in Q1 2021, a significant improvement of 3 percentage points compared to Q4 2020. It jumped from being the biggest drag on GDP in Q4 to the biggest contributor, showing that the first quarter had the stimulating effect of both the $600 subsidy in January and the $1,400 subsidy that began to be distributed in March on consumption, as well as the gradual release of service consumption under the easing of the epidemic. 2) From a monthly high-frequency perspective, PCE reached 8.5% year-on-year and 3.7% month-on-month in March, strengthening again after a slight decline during the direct subsidy vacuum in February. Among them, the year-on-year growth rates of durable goods and service consumption increased again, reaching 43.3% and 4.8% respectively in March, while the year-on-year growth rate of non-durable goods slowed slightly (4.3%), indicating that the US$1,400 subsidy in March had an immediate stimulating effect on consumption, as well as the recovery of service consumption under the relaxation of prevention and control measures. However, in terms of the strength of the recovery in service consumption, it was actually slightly weaker than the overly optimistic expectations of overseas markets in February and March.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/fb6a3cdada866cc05b11f3b44abb7b40.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"398\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Consumption of goods and services jointly drove high growth in personal consumption expenditure. 1) Commodity consumption is mainly driven by durable goods. In Q1 2021, commodity consumption contributed 3.2 percentage points to GDP, an improvement of 1.5 percentage points compared to Q4 2020. This was mainly due to the renewed high growth of durable goods under fiscal stimulus in the first quarter. In Q1 2021, the contribution of durable goods to GDP improved significantly by 1.3 percentage points compared to Q4, while the contribution of non-durable goods to GDP improved only slightly by 0.3 percentage points. 2) Service consumption has a greater impact on GDP growth than durable goods consumption. Although service consumption still had a negative contribution of -1.4% to GDP in Q1 2021, it improved significantly by 1.6 percentage points compared to the previous quarter. The improvement was greater than that of durable goods consumption, demonstrating that service consumption has greater resilience in improving under the dual factors of fiscal subsidies and easing of the pandemic.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/e8b1b37f95a3c799e28a194bc63e56e7.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"399\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>3. Investment: Equipment investment improved significantly, interest rates suppressed real estate investment, and inventory replenishment did not occur.</b></p><p>The impact of non-residential investment on GDP growth has improved significantly, while private inventory has become a drag. In Q1 2021, domestic private investment contributed 0.8 percentage points to GDP year-on-year, a slight improvement of 0.1 percentage points compared to the fourth quarter.</p><p>1) Improved non-residential investment indicates that the U.S. manufacturing sector has improved its expectations for the economic outlook. The main contributor to the improvement in private investment was non-residential investment (an improvement of 0.6 percentage points), mainly from equipment investment, indicating that manufacturing companies remain optimistic about the prospects for economic recovery.</p><p>2) The decline in the year-on-year contribution of private inventory changes to GDP in Q1 2021 reflects the gap between supply and demand in the US economy. Strong demand but slow production recovery lead to a decline in inventory. This means that the strengthening of commodity prices in Q1 cannot be supported by the logic of strong US industrial production and proactive inventory replenishment. The main factor dragging down private investment was changes in private inventories (a drag of 0.4 percentage points).</p><p>3) The year-on-year contribution of residential investment to GDP remained basically stable, while the month-on-month growth rate was suppressed by the overall rise in US interest rates in the previous period. It is expected to continue to cool down as interest rates rise in the medium term. In Q1 2021, residential investment's contribution to GDP remained stable. However, with the gradual rise in mortgage rates since 2021, the US real estate market has cooled down, and residential construction spending and existing home sales have slowed down. It is expected that the contribution of residential investment to GDP will gradually decline in the future.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/8831f8bd60fdfc9671df61b6e741faaa.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"393\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>4. Government spending and net exports: Subsidies drove up government spending, while the widening supply-demand gap led to high import growth.</b></p><p>The supply-demand gap in the US economy has further deepened the drag on GDP from net exports. In Q1 2021, net exports dragged down GDP by 2 percentage points year-on-year, an increase of 0.7 percentage points compared to Q4 2020. 1) Exports dragged down by 1 percentage point, but improved by 0.2 percentage points compared to the previous quarter, indicating a slight recovery in US industrial production. However, this still pales in comparison to the 3.0 percentage point improvement in personal consumption expenditures. In reality, it reflects the widening supply-demand gap in Q1 2021 due to excessive US fiscal subsidies. 2) Imports dragged down GDP by 1.0 percentage points year-on-year in Q1 2021, a significant increase of 0.9 percentage points compared to the previous quarter. The direct consequence of the widening supply and demand gap in the United States is the expansion of imports.</p><p>Government spending contributed 0.1 percentage points to GDP year-on-year in Q1 2021, mainly due to the U.S. government's direct subsidy checks to the banking system for residents and the cost of purchasing vaccines.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/1e6d4ceb162a00ae93de51b3cf6bb71b.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"386\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>5. The US economic recovery is expected to peak in the second quarter; attention should be paid to the subsequent developments of the pandemic.</b></p><p>Looking ahead, we believe the strength of the future U.S. economic recovery will depend on the vaccination progress and the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic. Assuming that the US pandemic continues to ease and the service sector gradually recovers, the second quarter is expected to be the peak of the US economic recovery. However, the supply-demand gap caused by excessive subsidies will continue until September, and the strength of the US economic recovery this year may not be as strong as the market expects.</p><p>Personal consumption expenditures: 1) Although goods consumption showed extremely strong momentum in Q1 2021, we expect the first quarter to be the peak of goods consumption, and it will gradually decline as subsidies subside; 2) Service sector consumption will continue to gradually recover as the pandemic eases, but the global pandemic has rebounded since March, especially in European countries and emerging countries. At the same time, the spread of more contagious virus variants in the United States and overseas countries will also affect the intensity of the subsequent recovery of the service sector.</p><p>Investment: 1) The main driver of the improvement in non-residential investment in Q1 2021 was positive economic expectations. From the current perspective, the global pandemic is the core factor determining the strength of economic recovery, and the subsequent progress of the pandemic needs to be monitored. 2) Residential investment will decline as the real estate market gradually cools down; 3) Changes in private inventory, i.e., the intensity of inventory replenishment, will depend on whether the current supply-demand gap in the United States can be alleviated. From the current perspective, it may not be until after unemployment benefits end in September that a significant trend of bridging between the supply and demand sides of the United States can emerge, thereby driving inventory investment.</p><p>Government spending and net exports: 1) With the continued payment of unemployment benefits in the second and third quarters, government spending is expected to continue to make a positive year-on-year contribution to GDP until the fourth quarter. If the US jobs program or the US family program can be implemented within the year, it will also boost government spending levels; In terms of net exports, exports will depend on the progress of the recovery of US industrial production, which, as mentioned above, may not be boosted until the fourth quarter, while imports, on the contrary, will fall back to normal levels as the supply-demand gap narrows later this year.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/32e1b124c2e79173310a2a69f29f1ee7.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"547\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>II. Global macro data: New confirmed cases in the United States decline</b></p><p><b>1. Epidemic: New confirmed cases in the United States decline</b></p><p>New confirmed cases in the United States declined this week. The average number of new confirmed cases in the United States dropped to more than 53,000 over the past seven days. As of April 29, the cumulative number of confirmed cases of COVID-19 worldwide exceeded 150 million, the cumulative number of deaths reached 3.14 million, and the cumulative number of recoveries reached 120 million. Over the four days of this week (April 27-April 30), the United States and the United Kingdom reported 220,000 and 9,000 new confirmed cases, respectively.</p><p>As of April 28, Israel had the highest average number of COVID-19 vaccines per 100 people globally, at 121.1 doses per 100 people, followed by the United States at 70.2 doses per 100 people and the United Kingdom at 70.9 doses per 100 people. As of April 28, Israel had the highest proportion of fully vaccinated people globally, at 58.7%, followed by the United States and the United Kingdom at 29.3% and 20.7%, respectively.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/887a942234cb8fe459a2f83e1d51371f.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"591\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/62573bfd15fa133a1b4a5d4e236f878d.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"397\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>2. Demand: Japanese retail sales rebounded significantly year-on-year.</b></p><p>Both retail and wholesale sales in Japan saw significant year-on-year growth. Japan's retail sales index rose 5.3% year-on-year in March, with textiles and apparel retailing at 15.8% year-on-year and wholesale sales at 1.0% year-on-year in March.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/a115423dbfa92a2b68fd1ddba7b7202c.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"432\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>South Korea's retail sales continued to grow year-on-year in March, and consumption of semi-durable goods increased significantly. South Korea's retail sales rose 3.5 percentage points to 13.5% year-on-year in March, with semi-durable goods consumption growing the fastest at 35.5% year-on-year. Durable goods increased by 13.6% year-on-year, while non-durable goods increased by 6.5% year-on-year.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/660433692ab7c356ac6e92af5532c956.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"549\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>3. Supply and Employment: New orders for U.S. durable goods rose both year-on-year and month-on-month.</b></p><p>U.S. durable goods inventories rose, and new order growth both increased month-on-month. U.S. durable goods inventories reached $431.84 billion in March, up 1.0% month-over-month and 1.7% year-over-year. New orders for durable goods in the United States rose 0.5% month-on-month in March and a sharp increase of 25% year-on-year.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/00d167c28987b587b0353bdb22cabcb3.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"397\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Japan's unemployment rate fell to 2.6% in March. Japan's unemployment rate fell 0.3 percentage points to 2.6% in March from the previous month. South Korea's industrial production index rose both year-on-year and month-on-month, indicating a continued recovery in industry. South Korea's industrial production index rose 5.7% year-on-year and 0.8% month-on-month to 112.6 in March.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/3e518f69ea70eb9423bd2c4c0800a9d4.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"393\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>U.S. industrial materials production continues to rise. 1) In the week ending April 24, U.S. weekly crude steel production rose 43.6% year-on-year, and capacity utilization increased slightly by 0.4 percentage points from the previous week to 78.4%; 2) As of April 23, the operational capacity utilization rate of U.S. refineries rose by 0.4 percentage points to 85.4%.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/08378049f4011957a1ca13a61b5f7ee9.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"395\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>The number of initial jobless claims in the United States fell slightly that week, while the number of continuing jobless claims rose slightly. In the week ending April 24, initial jobless claims in the United States reached 553,000, a decrease of 13,000 from the previous week; The number of people continuing to claim unemployment benefits reached 3.66 million in the week ending April 17, an increase of 9,000 from the previous week.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/50abaebb23322c65845134f36edf2eac.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"550\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>4. Trade: US imports and exports both rose significantly year-on-year in March.</b></p><p>U.S. imports and exports both rose significantly year-on-year in March. U.S. exports rose sharply by 16.5 percentage points to 11.5% in March from the previous month, while imports rose by 20.6% year-on-year. The U.S. merchandise trade balance was -$90.59 billion in March.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/b94fcaf0b73f26e0f7e86a9f8b746b80.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"549\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>5. Inflation and commodities: Oil prices rose slightly.</b></p><p>EIA crude oil inventories rose by 9 million barrels in the week ending April 28, while U.S. crude oil production fell slightly by 100,000 barrels per day to 10.9 million barrels per day. As of April 29, the weekly average price of WTI crude oil rose to $63.2 per barrel; The weekly average price of Brent crude rose to $66.6 per barrel.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/2ea9504a69c4ccccc0e74ff1a56da96e.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"396\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/e2a42a869453a51bf63a352119f75e6a.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"402\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>6. Real Estate: The US existing home sales index rose year-on-year in March.</b></p><p>The U.S. S&P/CS home price index rose for the eighth consecutive month in February. The U.S. S&P/CS home price index rose 11.9% year-over-year to 246.0 in February, marking its eighth consecutive month of gains. The U.S. existing home sales index rose sharply by 23.3% year-on-year and 1.9% month-on-month in March.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/6ac3751240b8a02c34f4c66d93fb255b.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"398\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>New home starts and construction orders in Japan rose sharply in March. New home starts in Japan in March rose 1.5% year-on-year and 18.1% month-on-month, while construction orders in March rose 12.5% year-on-year and 192.7% month-on-month, the highest increase in nearly a year.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/e961519800be12d5e185f10acff56a58.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"392\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>U.S. 5-year mortgage rates fell, while 15-year and 30-year mortgage rates rose. In the week ending April 29, the 5-year mortgage rate fell 0.2 percentage points to 2.6%, while the 15-year and 30-year mortgage rates rose to 2.3% and 3.0%, respectively. In the week ending April 23, the U.S. MBA market index fell 18.2 to 706.6, indicating a slight cooling of housing market activity.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/2eb2b206b830b79a11aed2265d986bec.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"395\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>7. Monetary policy and exchange rates: the US Dollar Index fell, while gold prices remained basically stable.</b></p><p>This week, the Federal Reserve held its interest rate meeting, Powell's speech was dovish, the US Dollar Index fell, and gold prices remained basically stable. On April 28 local time, the Federal Reserve released its interest rate meeting statement. At the post-meeting press conference, Powell said that it would take some time to see substantial progress, and that the current scale of asset purchases would be maintained before that. It was not yet time to discuss Taper, and the US Dollar Index continued to decline. As of April 29, the the US Dollar Index closed at 90.6140, down 0.7% from the previous week; The euro and the pound sterling closed at 1.2129 and 1.3906 against the dollar respectively (pound sterling exchange rate data as of the 28th), appreciating 0.7% and depreciating 0.2% respectively from last week; The Canadian dollar strengthened, closing at 1.2292, up 1.7% from last week, as the Bank of Canada took the lead in tapering. The average weekly price of gold in London this week was $1,774.8 per ounce, basically stable from last week, with a year-on-year increase of 1.2 percentage points to 3.6%.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/c2e4e8d549f84a56f7d651806cc3a657.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"398\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/09b461fbeb60aed3abf2e7ffd691b486.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"551\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>","source":"highlight_zhitongcaijin","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Was the US GDP relatively strong or weak in the first quarter?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWas the US GDP relatively strong or weak in the first quarter?\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">智通财经网</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-05-02 15:45</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>This article is from \"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/000166\">Shenwan Hongyuan</a>\"Macroeconomic\".</b></p><p>Abstract</p><p><b>I. Weekly Viewpoint: Was the US Q1 GDP relatively strong or weak?</b></p><p><b>The US GDP grew by 0.4% year-on-year in Q1 2021, slightly lower than market expectations.</b>The US GDP grew 0.4% year-on-year in real terms in Q1 2021, turning positive year-on-year for the first time since the pandemic, and 1.6% month-on-month. The main contributing factors were goods consumption, service consumption, and non-residential investment, demonstrating the rapid recovery of the US economy under the improvement of the pandemic and fiscal subsidies. However, the main drags were changes in private inventories and imports. In fact, the US GDP growth rate in the first quarter was slightly lower than market expectations, indicating insufficient market awareness of the slow recovery of production caused by excessive fiscal subsidies in the US, as well as overly optimistic expectations for the improvement of the pandemic.</p><p><b>Consumer spending: Subsidies boost commodity consumption, and the pandemic eases the recovery of the service sector.</b>1) In Q1 2021, U.S. personal consumption expenditures contributed 1.1 percentage points to GDP year-on-year, a significant improvement of 3 percentage points compared to Q4 2020. Commodity consumption is mainly driven by durable goods, while service consumption has a greater impact on GDP growth than durable goods consumption. 2) From a monthly high-frequency perspective, PCE in March was 8.5% year-on-year and 3.7% month-on-month, strengthening again after a slight decline during the direct subsidy vacuum in February. This demonstrates the immediate stimulating effect of the $1,400 subsidy in March on consumption, as well as the recovery of service consumption after the relaxation of prevention and control measures. However, in terms of the strength of the recovery in service consumption, it was actually slightly weaker than the overly optimistic expectations of overseas markets in February and March.</p><p><b>Investment: Equipment investment improved significantly, interest rates suppressed real estate investment, and inventory replenishment did not occur.</b>In Q1 2021, domestic private investment contributed 0.8 percentage points to GDP year-on-year, a slight improvement of 0.1 percentage points compared to the fourth quarter. 1) Improved non-residential investment indicates that the U.S. manufacturing sector's expectations for the economic outlook have improved; 2) The decline in the year-on-year contribution of private inventory changes to GDP in Q1 2021 reflects the supply-demand gap in the US economy. Strong demand but slow production recovery lead to a decline in inventories. This means that the strength of commodity prices in Q1 cannot be supported by the logic of strong US industrial production and proactive inventory replenishment. 3) The year-on-year contribution of residential investment to GDP remained basically stable, while the month-on-month growth rate was suppressed by the overall rise in US interest rates in the previous period. It is expected to continue to cool down as interest rates rise in the medium term.</p><p><b>Government spending and net exports: Subsidies have driven up government spending, while the widening supply-demand gap has led to high import growth.</b>The supply-demand gap in the US economy has further deepened the drag on GDP from net exports. In Q1 2021, net exports dragged down GDP by 2 percentage points year-on-year, an increase of 0.7 percentage points compared to Q4 2020. Government spending contributed 0.1 percentage points to GDP year-on-year in Q1 2021, mainly due to the U.S. government's direct subsidy checks to the banking system for residents and the cost of purchasing vaccines.</p><p><b>The US economic recovery is expected to peak in the second quarter, and attention should be paid to the subsequent developments of the pandemic.</b>We believe the strength of the future U.S. economic recovery will depend on the vaccination process and the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic. Assuming that the US pandemic continues to ease and the service sector gradually recovers, the second quarter is expected to be the peak of the US economic recovery. However, the supply-demand gap caused by excessive subsidies will continue until September, and the strength of the US economic recovery this year may not be as strong as the market expects. Personal consumption expenditures: The first quarter is expected to be the peak of goods consumption, and service sector consumption will continue to gradually recover as the pandemic eases. However, the spread of more contagious virus variants in the United States and overseas countries will also affect the strength of the subsequent service sector recovery. Investment: The improvement of non-residential investment requires attention to the subsequent progress of the pandemic. Residential investment will decline as the real estate market gradually cools down; Changes in private inventories may not improve until unemployment benefits end in September. Government spending and net exports: Government spending is expected to continue to make a positive year-on-year contribution to GDP until the fourth quarter. Net exports will return to normal levels as the supply-demand gap narrows later this year.</p><p><b>II. Global Macro Data</b></p><p><b>This week's high-frequency data</b>New orders for U.S. durable goods rose both year-on-year and month-on-month.</p><p><b>epidemic</b>The number of new confirmed cases in the United States has decreased.</p><p><b>Demand</b>Retail sales in Japan rebounded significantly year-on-year.</p><p><b>Supply and Employment</b>New orders for durable goods in the United States rose both year-on-year and month-on-month.</p><p><b>Trade</b>U.S. imports and exports both rose significantly year-on-year in March.</p><p><b>Inflation and commodities</b>Oil prices rose slightly.</p><p><b>Real Estate</b>The U.S. existing home sales index rose in March.</p><p><b>Monetary policy and exchange rates</b>the US Dollar Index fell, while gold prices remained stable.</p><p><b>Global Macro Calendar</b>Focus on the US ISM Manufacturing PMI</p><p>text</p><p><b>I. Weekly Viewpoint: Was the US Q1 GDP relatively strong or weak?</b></p><p><b>US GDP grew 0.4% year-on-year in Q1, slightly lower than market expectations.</b></p><p>The US GDP grew by 0.4% year-on-year in real terms in Q1 2021, turning positive year-on-year for the first time since the pandemic, and by 1.6% month-on-month. The main contributing factors were goods consumption, service consumption, and non-residential investment, demonstrating the relatively rapid recovery of the US economy under the improvement of the pandemic and fiscal subsidies. The main drags were changes in private inventories and imports. In fact, the US GDP growth rate in the first quarter was slightly lower than market expectations, indicating insufficient market awareness of the slow production recovery caused by excessive fiscal subsidies in the US, as well as overly optimistic expectations for the improvement of the pandemic.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/867b3b31bf5a4410ca85884cf283ce1f.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"588\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>2. Consumer spending: Subsidies boost commodity consumption, and the pandemic eases the recovery of the service sector.</b></p><p>In Q1 2021, government subsidies of up to $2,000 per person boosted consumer spending; The easing of the pandemic has driven the recovery of service consumption, but it is slightly weaker than the initial optimistic expectations of overseas markets. 1) From a quarterly perspective, US personal consumption expenditures contributed 1.1 percentage points to GDP year-on-year in Q1 2021, a significant improvement of 3 percentage points compared to Q4 2020. It jumped from being the biggest drag on GDP in Q4 to the biggest contributor, showing that the first quarter had the stimulating effect of both the $600 subsidy in January and the $1,400 subsidy that began to be distributed in March on consumption, as well as the gradual release of service consumption under the easing of the epidemic. 2) From a monthly high-frequency perspective, PCE reached 8.5% year-on-year and 3.7% month-on-month in March, strengthening again after a slight decline during the direct subsidy vacuum in February. Among them, the year-on-year growth rates of durable goods and service consumption increased again, reaching 43.3% and 4.8% respectively in March, while the year-on-year growth rate of non-durable goods slowed slightly (4.3%), indicating that the US$1,400 subsidy in March had an immediate stimulating effect on consumption, as well as the recovery of service consumption under the relaxation of prevention and control measures. However, in terms of the strength of the recovery in service consumption, it was actually slightly weaker than the overly optimistic expectations of overseas markets in February and March.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/fb6a3cdada866cc05b11f3b44abb7b40.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"398\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Consumption of goods and services jointly drove high growth in personal consumption expenditure. 1) Commodity consumption is mainly driven by durable goods. In Q1 2021, commodity consumption contributed 3.2 percentage points to GDP, an improvement of 1.5 percentage points compared to Q4 2020. This was mainly due to the renewed high growth of durable goods under fiscal stimulus in the first quarter. In Q1 2021, the contribution of durable goods to GDP improved significantly by 1.3 percentage points compared to Q4, while the contribution of non-durable goods to GDP improved only slightly by 0.3 percentage points. 2) Service consumption has a greater impact on GDP growth than durable goods consumption. Although service consumption still had a negative contribution of -1.4% to GDP in Q1 2021, it improved significantly by 1.6 percentage points compared to the previous quarter. The improvement was greater than that of durable goods consumption, demonstrating that service consumption has greater resilience in improving under the dual factors of fiscal subsidies and easing of the pandemic.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/e8b1b37f95a3c799e28a194bc63e56e7.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"399\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>3. Investment: Equipment investment improved significantly, interest rates suppressed real estate investment, and inventory replenishment did not occur.</b></p><p>The impact of non-residential investment on GDP growth has improved significantly, while private inventory has become a drag. In Q1 2021, domestic private investment contributed 0.8 percentage points to GDP year-on-year, a slight improvement of 0.1 percentage points compared to the fourth quarter.</p><p>1) Improved non-residential investment indicates that the U.S. manufacturing sector has improved its expectations for the economic outlook. The main contributor to the improvement in private investment was non-residential investment (an improvement of 0.6 percentage points), mainly from equipment investment, indicating that manufacturing companies remain optimistic about the prospects for economic recovery.</p><p>2) The decline in the year-on-year contribution of private inventory changes to GDP in Q1 2021 reflects the gap between supply and demand in the US economy. Strong demand but slow production recovery lead to a decline in inventory. This means that the strengthening of commodity prices in Q1 cannot be supported by the logic of strong US industrial production and proactive inventory replenishment. The main factor dragging down private investment was changes in private inventories (a drag of 0.4 percentage points).</p><p>3) The year-on-year contribution of residential investment to GDP remained basically stable, while the month-on-month growth rate was suppressed by the overall rise in US interest rates in the previous period. It is expected to continue to cool down as interest rates rise in the medium term. In Q1 2021, residential investment's contribution to GDP remained stable. However, with the gradual rise in mortgage rates since 2021, the US real estate market has cooled down, and residential construction spending and existing home sales have slowed down. It is expected that the contribution of residential investment to GDP will gradually decline in the future.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/8831f8bd60fdfc9671df61b6e741faaa.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"393\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>4. Government spending and net exports: Subsidies drove up government spending, while the widening supply-demand gap led to high import growth.</b></p><p>The supply-demand gap in the US economy has further deepened the drag on GDP from net exports. In Q1 2021, net exports dragged down GDP by 2 percentage points year-on-year, an increase of 0.7 percentage points compared to Q4 2020. 1) Exports dragged down by 1 percentage point, but improved by 0.2 percentage points compared to the previous quarter, indicating a slight recovery in US industrial production. However, this still pales in comparison to the 3.0 percentage point improvement in personal consumption expenditures. In reality, it reflects the widening supply-demand gap in Q1 2021 due to excessive US fiscal subsidies. 2) Imports dragged down GDP by 1.0 percentage points year-on-year in Q1 2021, a significant increase of 0.9 percentage points compared to the previous quarter. The direct consequence of the widening supply and demand gap in the United States is the expansion of imports.</p><p>Government spending contributed 0.1 percentage points to GDP year-on-year in Q1 2021, mainly due to the U.S. government's direct subsidy checks to the banking system for residents and the cost of purchasing vaccines.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/1e6d4ceb162a00ae93de51b3cf6bb71b.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"386\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>5. The US economic recovery is expected to peak in the second quarter; attention should be paid to the subsequent developments of the pandemic.</b></p><p>Looking ahead, we believe the strength of the future U.S. economic recovery will depend on the vaccination progress and the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic. Assuming that the US pandemic continues to ease and the service sector gradually recovers, the second quarter is expected to be the peak of the US economic recovery. However, the supply-demand gap caused by excessive subsidies will continue until September, and the strength of the US economic recovery this year may not be as strong as the market expects.</p><p>Personal consumption expenditures: 1) Although goods consumption showed extremely strong momentum in Q1 2021, we expect the first quarter to be the peak of goods consumption, and it will gradually decline as subsidies subside; 2) Service sector consumption will continue to gradually recover as the pandemic eases, but the global pandemic has rebounded since March, especially in European countries and emerging countries. At the same time, the spread of more contagious virus variants in the United States and overseas countries will also affect the intensity of the subsequent recovery of the service sector.</p><p>Investment: 1) The main driver of the improvement in non-residential investment in Q1 2021 was positive economic expectations. From the current perspective, the global pandemic is the core factor determining the strength of economic recovery, and the subsequent progress of the pandemic needs to be monitored. 2) Residential investment will decline as the real estate market gradually cools down; 3) Changes in private inventory, i.e., the intensity of inventory replenishment, will depend on whether the current supply-demand gap in the United States can be alleviated. From the current perspective, it may not be until after unemployment benefits end in September that a significant trend of bridging between the supply and demand sides of the United States can emerge, thereby driving inventory investment.</p><p>Government spending and net exports: 1) With the continued payment of unemployment benefits in the second and third quarters, government spending is expected to continue to make a positive year-on-year contribution to GDP until the fourth quarter. If the US jobs program or the US family program can be implemented within the year, it will also boost government spending levels; In terms of net exports, exports will depend on the progress of the recovery of US industrial production, which, as mentioned above, may not be boosted until the fourth quarter, while imports, on the contrary, will fall back to normal levels as the supply-demand gap narrows later this year.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/32e1b124c2e79173310a2a69f29f1ee7.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"547\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>II. Global macro data: New confirmed cases in the United States decline</b></p><p><b>1. Epidemic: New confirmed cases in the United States decline</b></p><p>New confirmed cases in the United States declined this week. The average number of new confirmed cases in the United States dropped to more than 53,000 over the past seven days. As of April 29, the cumulative number of confirmed cases of COVID-19 worldwide exceeded 150 million, the cumulative number of deaths reached 3.14 million, and the cumulative number of recoveries reached 120 million. Over the four days of this week (April 27-April 30), the United States and the United Kingdom reported 220,000 and 9,000 new confirmed cases, respectively.</p><p>As of April 28, Israel had the highest average number of COVID-19 vaccines per 100 people globally, at 121.1 doses per 100 people, followed by the United States at 70.2 doses per 100 people and the United Kingdom at 70.9 doses per 100 people. As of April 28, Israel had the highest proportion of fully vaccinated people globally, at 58.7%, followed by the United States and the United Kingdom at 29.3% and 20.7%, respectively.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/887a942234cb8fe459a2f83e1d51371f.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"591\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/62573bfd15fa133a1b4a5d4e236f878d.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"397\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>2. Demand: Japanese retail sales rebounded significantly year-on-year.</b></p><p>Both retail and wholesale sales in Japan saw significant year-on-year growth. Japan's retail sales index rose 5.3% year-on-year in March, with textiles and apparel retailing at 15.8% year-on-year and wholesale sales at 1.0% year-on-year in March.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/a115423dbfa92a2b68fd1ddba7b7202c.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"432\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>South Korea's retail sales continued to grow year-on-year in March, and consumption of semi-durable goods increased significantly. South Korea's retail sales rose 3.5 percentage points to 13.5% year-on-year in March, with semi-durable goods consumption growing the fastest at 35.5% year-on-year. Durable goods increased by 13.6% year-on-year, while non-durable goods increased by 6.5% year-on-year.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/660433692ab7c356ac6e92af5532c956.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"549\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>3. Supply and Employment: New orders for U.S. durable goods rose both year-on-year and month-on-month.</b></p><p>U.S. durable goods inventories rose, and new order growth both increased month-on-month. U.S. durable goods inventories reached $431.84 billion in March, up 1.0% month-over-month and 1.7% year-over-year. New orders for durable goods in the United States rose 0.5% month-on-month in March and a sharp increase of 25% year-on-year.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/00d167c28987b587b0353bdb22cabcb3.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"397\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Japan's unemployment rate fell to 2.6% in March. Japan's unemployment rate fell 0.3 percentage points to 2.6% in March from the previous month. South Korea's industrial production index rose both year-on-year and month-on-month, indicating a continued recovery in industry. South Korea's industrial production index rose 5.7% year-on-year and 0.8% month-on-month to 112.6 in March.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/3e518f69ea70eb9423bd2c4c0800a9d4.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"393\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>U.S. industrial materials production continues to rise. 1) In the week ending April 24, U.S. weekly crude steel production rose 43.6% year-on-year, and capacity utilization increased slightly by 0.4 percentage points from the previous week to 78.4%; 2) As of April 23, the operational capacity utilization rate of U.S. refineries rose by 0.4 percentage points to 85.4%.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/08378049f4011957a1ca13a61b5f7ee9.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"395\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>The number of initial jobless claims in the United States fell slightly that week, while the number of continuing jobless claims rose slightly. In the week ending April 24, initial jobless claims in the United States reached 553,000, a decrease of 13,000 from the previous week; The number of people continuing to claim unemployment benefits reached 3.66 million in the week ending April 17, an increase of 9,000 from the previous week.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/50abaebb23322c65845134f36edf2eac.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"550\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>4. Trade: US imports and exports both rose significantly year-on-year in March.</b></p><p>U.S. imports and exports both rose significantly year-on-year in March. U.S. exports rose sharply by 16.5 percentage points to 11.5% in March from the previous month, while imports rose by 20.6% year-on-year. The U.S. merchandise trade balance was -$90.59 billion in March.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/b94fcaf0b73f26e0f7e86a9f8b746b80.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"549\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>5. Inflation and commodities: Oil prices rose slightly.</b></p><p>EIA crude oil inventories rose by 9 million barrels in the week ending April 28, while U.S. crude oil production fell slightly by 100,000 barrels per day to 10.9 million barrels per day. As of April 29, the weekly average price of WTI crude oil rose to $63.2 per barrel; The weekly average price of Brent crude rose to $66.6 per barrel.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/2ea9504a69c4ccccc0e74ff1a56da96e.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"396\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/e2a42a869453a51bf63a352119f75e6a.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"402\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>6. Real Estate: The US existing home sales index rose year-on-year in March.</b></p><p>The U.S. S&P/CS home price index rose for the eighth consecutive month in February. The U.S. S&P/CS home price index rose 11.9% year-over-year to 246.0 in February, marking its eighth consecutive month of gains. The U.S. existing home sales index rose sharply by 23.3% year-on-year and 1.9% month-on-month in March.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/6ac3751240b8a02c34f4c66d93fb255b.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"398\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>New home starts and construction orders in Japan rose sharply in March. New home starts in Japan in March rose 1.5% year-on-year and 18.1% month-on-month, while construction orders in March rose 12.5% year-on-year and 192.7% month-on-month, the highest increase in nearly a year.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/e961519800be12d5e185f10acff56a58.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"392\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>U.S. 5-year mortgage rates fell, while 15-year and 30-year mortgage rates rose. In the week ending April 29, the 5-year mortgage rate fell 0.2 percentage points to 2.6%, while the 15-year and 30-year mortgage rates rose to 2.3% and 3.0%, respectively. In the week ending April 23, the U.S. MBA market index fell 18.2 to 706.6, indicating a slight cooling of housing market activity.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/2eb2b206b830b79a11aed2265d986bec.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"395\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>7. Monetary policy and exchange rates: the US Dollar Index fell, while gold prices remained basically stable.</b></p><p>This week, the Federal Reserve held its interest rate meeting, Powell's speech was dovish, the US Dollar Index fell, and gold prices remained basically stable. On April 28 local time, the Federal Reserve released its interest rate meeting statement. At the post-meeting press conference, Powell said that it would take some time to see substantial progress, and that the current scale of asset purchases would be maintained before that. It was not yet time to discuss Taper, and the US Dollar Index continued to decline. As of April 29, the the US Dollar Index closed at 90.6140, down 0.7% from the previous week; The euro and the pound sterling closed at 1.2129 and 1.3906 against the dollar respectively (pound sterling exchange rate data as of the 28th), appreciating 0.7% and depreciating 0.2% respectively from last week; The Canadian dollar strengthened, closing at 1.2292, up 1.7% from last week, as the Bank of Canada took the lead in tapering. The average weekly price of gold in London this week was $1,774.8 per ounce, basically stable from last week, with a year-on-year increase of 1.2 percentage points to 3.6%.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/c2e4e8d549f84a56f7d651806cc3a657.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"398\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/09b461fbeb60aed3abf2e7ffd691b486.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"551\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"http://www.zhitongcaijing.com/content/detail/466474.html\">智通财经网</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://img.zhitongcaijing.com/image/20210501/20210501134714_46528.png?x-oss-process=image/format,jpg/quality,Q_80/resize,w_250","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"http://www.zhitongcaijing.com/content/detail/466474.html","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/6ca2dcdccfa2217fb20a0351f4efe814","article_id":"2132567538","content_text":"本文来自“申万宏源宏观”。摘要一、周观点：美国一季度GDP究竟是偏强还是偏弱?21Q1美国GDP同比0.4%，略低于市场预期。美国21Q1  GDP实际同比0.4%，疫情以来首次同比转正，环比1.6%。主要贡献因素为商品消费、服务消费、非住宅投资，显示出疫情改善+财政补贴下美国经济快速复苏。但主要拖累项为私人存货变动及进口，且实际上，美国一季度GDP增速是小幅低于市场预期的，显示市场对美国过度财政补贴导致生产恢复缓慢的认识不足，以及对疫情改善过度乐观的预期。居民消费：补贴推动商品消费，疫情缓和服务业修复。1)21Q1美国个人消费支出拉动GDP同比1.1个百分点，较20Q4大幅改善3个百分点。商品消费主要为耐用品推动，而服务消费对GDP拉动的改善幅度大于耐用品消费;2)月度高频角度，3月PCE同比8.5%，环比3.7%，在2月直接补贴真空期小幅回落后再度走强。显示3月1400美金补贴发放对于消费立竿见影的刺激效果，以及防控措施放松下服务消费的恢复。但从服务消费恢复的强度来看，实际上略弱于2-3月海外市场的过度乐观预期。投资：设备投资改善显著，利率抑制地产投资，补库存并未出现。21Q1国内私人投资拉动GDP同比0.8个百分点，较4季度小幅改善0.1个百分点。1)非住宅投资改善显示美国生产部门对经济前景预期有所改善;2)私人存货变动对21Q1  GDP同比贡献的下降是美国经济供需撕裂的体现，需求旺盛而生产恢复缓慢，从而导致库存下降，这也就意味着Q1大宗商品价格的走强并不能得到美国工业生产强劲、主动补库存逻辑的支持;3)住宅投资对GDP同比贡献基本保持稳定，环比增速则随前期美国利率的整体抬升而受到抑制。后续预计将随着利率的中期上行过程而持续降温。政府支出和净出口：补贴推动政府支出增加，供需缺口拉大导致进口高增。美国经济供需撕裂导致净出口对GDP拖累程度再度加深。21Q1净出口拖累GDP同比2个百分点，拖累程度较上20Q4扩大0.7个百分点。政府支出21Q1对GDP同比拉动0.1个百分点，主要由于美国政府向银行体系发放针对居民的直接补贴支票以及购买疫苗费用。预计美国经济复苏2季度为高点，关注疫情后续进展。我们认为未来美国经济恢复的强度依赖于疫苗接种进程，以及新冠疫情的扩散情况。在美国疫情持续缓和、服务业渐进修复的假设下，预计2季度为美国经济恢复高点，但由于过度补贴导致的供需撕裂情况将持续到9月份，年内美国经济恢复的强度或将不会如市场预期一般强劲。个人消费支出：预计1季度是商品消费高点，服务业消费将继续随着疫情缓和而渐进式恢复，但美国本土及海外国家传染性更强的病毒变种的传播也将影响后续服务业恢复强度;投资：非住宅投资的改善需要关注后续疫情进展。住宅投资将随着地产市场的逐步降温而走低;私人库存变动或要等到9月失业补贴结束之后得以改善。政府支出和净出口：政府支出预计将在4季度前持续对GDP同比形成正贡献。净出口将随着今年后期供需缺口的收窄而回到正常水平。二、全球宏观数据本周高频数据：美国耐用品新订单同环比均上升疫情：美国新增确诊病例下降。需求：日本零售销售同比大幅回升。供给与就业：美国耐用品新订单同环比均上升。贸易：美国3月进出口同比均大幅上升。通胀和大宗商品：油价小幅上行。房地产：美3月成屋签约销售指数上升。货币政策和汇率：美元指数下跌，黄金价格稳定。全球宏观日历：关注美国ISM制造业PMI正文一、周观点：美国一季度GDP究竟是偏强还是偏弱?1.21Q1美国GDP同比0.4%，略低于市场预期美国21Q1GDP实际同比0.4%，疫情以来首次同比转正，环比1.6%。主要贡献因素为商品消费、服务消费、非住宅投资，显示出疫情改善+财政补贴下美国经济相对较快的复苏。主要拖累项为私人存货变动及进口，且实际上，美国一季度GDP增速是小幅低于市场预期的，显示市场对美国过度财政补贴导致生产恢复缓慢的认识不足，以及对疫情改善过度乐观的预期。2.居民消费：补贴推动商品消费，疫情缓和服务业修复21Q1高达2000美金/人的财政补贴拉动商品消费;疫情缓和推动服务消费恢复，但略弱于前期海外市场乐观预期。1)从季度角度看，21Q1美国个人消费支出拉动GDP同比1.1个百分点，较20Q4大幅改善3个百分点，从4季度对GDP最大的拖累项一跃转为最大的贡献项，显示一季度同时具备1月600美金补贴以及3月开始发放的1400美金补贴对消费的刺激效果，以及疫情缓和下服务消费的渐次释放。2)而从月度高频角度，3月PCE同比达到8.5%，环比3.7%，在2月直接补贴真空期小幅回落后再度走强。其中，耐用品、服务消费同比增速再度提升，3月分别达到43.3%和4.8%，而非耐用品同比略有放缓(4.3%)，显示3月1400美金补贴发放对于消费立竿见影的刺激效果，以及防控措施放松下服务消费的恢复。但从服务消费恢复的强度来看，实际上略弱于2-3月海外市场的过度乐观预期。商品消费、服务消费共同驱动个人消费支出高增。1)商品消费主要为耐用品推动。21Q1商品消费对GDP拉动3.2个百分点，较20Q4改善1.5个百分点，主要归功于耐用品在一季度财政刺激下再度高增，21Q1耐用品对GDP贡献度较4季度大幅改善1.3个百分点，而非耐用品对GDP贡献度仅小幅改善0.3个百分点;2)服务消费对GDP拉动效果的改善幅度大于耐用品消费。21Q1服务消费对GDP虽然仍为-1.4%的负拉动，但已较上季度大幅改善1.6个百分点，改善幅度更甚于耐用品消费，显示出服务消费在财政补贴+疫情缓和双重因素下改善的弹性更大。3.投资：设备投资改善显著，利率抑制地产投资，补库存并未出现非住宅投资对GDP拉动效果大幅改善，私人存货转为拖累。21Q1国内私人投资拉动GDP同比0.8个百分点，较4季度小幅改善0.1个百分点。1)非住宅投资改善显示美国生产部门对经济前景预期有所改善。私人投资改善的主要贡献因素为非住宅投资(改善0.6个百分点)，其中主要来自于设备投资，显示制造业企业对经济恢复前景保持乐观。2)私人存货变动对21Q1  GDP同比贡献的下降是美国经济供需撕裂的体现，需求旺盛而生产恢复缓慢，从而导致库存下降，这也就意味着Q1大宗商品价格的走强并不能得到美国工业生产强劲、主动补库存逻辑的支持。拖累私人投资的主要因素为私人存货变动(拖累0.4个百分点)。3)住宅投资对GDP同比贡献基本保持稳定，环比增速则随前期美国利率的整体抬升而受到抑制。后续预计将随着利率的中期上行过程而持续降温。21Q1住宅投资对GDP的拉动保持稳定，但随着21年以来抵押贷款利率的逐步上行，美国房地产市场已经有所降温，住宅营建支出、成屋销售已经有所放缓，预计后续住宅投资对GDP的拉动效果将逐步下降。4.政府支出和净出口：补贴推动政府支出增加，供需缺口拉大导致进口高增美国经济供需撕裂导致净出口对GDP拖累程度再度加深。21Q1净出口拖累GDP同比2个百分点，拖累程度较上20Q4扩大0.7个百分点。1)出口拖累1个百分点，但已较上个季度改善0.2个百分点，显示美国工业生产的小幅恢复，但相比个人消费支出3.0个百分点的改善幅度仍然相形见绌，实际体现的是美国过度财政补贴下21Q1供需缺口的拉大;2)而进口在21Q1拖累GDP同比1.0个百分点，拖累程度较上季度大幅扩大0.9个百分点，美国供需缺口拉大的直接后果便是进口规模的扩大。政府支出21Q1对GDP同比拉动0.1个百分点，主要由于美国政府向银行体系发放针对居民的直接补贴支票以及购买疫苗费用。5.预计美国经济复苏2季度为高点，关注疫情后续进展展望未来，我们认为未来美国经济恢复的强度依赖于疫苗接种进程，以及新冠疫情的扩散情况。在美国疫情持续缓和、服务业渐进修复的假设下，预计2季度为美国经济恢复高点，但由于过度补贴导致的供需撕裂情况将持续到9月份，年内美国经济恢复的强度或将不会如市场预期一般强劲。个人消费支出：1)虽然21Q1商品消费显示出极为强劲的势头，但我们预计1季度已经是商品消费高点，后续将随着补贴退潮而逐步回落;2)服务业消费将继续随着疫情缓和而渐进式恢复，但3月以来全球疫情有所反弹，特别是在欧洲国家以及新兴国家，同时美国本土及海外国家传染性更强的病毒变种的传播也将影响后续服务业恢复强度。投资：1)21Q1非住宅投资的改善主要驱动力为经济向好预期，而从当前时点来看，全球疫情是决定经济恢复强度的核心因素，需要关注后续疫情进展;2)住宅投资将随着地产市场的逐步降温而走低;3)私人库存变动，即补库存的力度将依赖于美国供需撕裂的现状是否能够缓和，从当前来看，或要等到9月失业补贴结束之后，美国供需两端才能出现显著的弥合趋势，进而带动库存投资。政府支出和净出口：1)随着失业补贴在2、3季度的持续发放，政府支出预计将在4季度前持续对GDP同比形成正贡献，而如果美国就业计划或美国家庭计划能够在年内落地，也将提振政府支出水平;净出口方面，出口将依赖于美国工业生产恢复的进度，如上文所说，或要到4季度才能得到提振，进口则恰恰相反，将随着今年后期供需缺口的收窄而回落到正常水平。二、全球宏观数据：美国新增确诊病例下降1.疫情：美国新增确诊病例下降本周美国新增确诊病例下降。美国新增确诊7日平均下降至5.3万人以上。截止4月29日，全球新冠疫情累计确诊超过1.5亿，累计死亡病例314万人，累计康复病例1.2亿人。本周四天(4月27日-4月30日)美国、英国分别新增确诊病例22万人和0.9万人。截止4月28日，全球范围内平均每百人接种新冠疫苗最多的是以色列，达每百人121.1针，美国每百人70.2针，英国每百人70.9针。截止4月28日，全球范围内完全接种疫苗的人占人口比例最高的是以色列，达58.7%，美国、英国分别为29.3%、20.7%。2.需求：日本零售销售同比大幅回升日本零售销售和批发销售同比均大幅上行。日本3月零售销售指数同比5.3%，其中零售中纺织服装同比15.8%，3月批发销售指数同比1.0%。韩国3月零售销售同比持续增长，半耐用品消费大幅增长。韩国3月零售销售同比较上月上升3.5个百分点至13.5%，其中半耐用品消费增速最快，同比35.5%;耐用品同比13.6%，非耐用品同比6.5%。3.供给与就业：美国耐用品新订单同环比均上升美国耐用品库存上升，新订单增速同环比均上升。3月美国耐用品库存达4318.4亿美元，环比上升1.0%，同比增长1.7%。美国3月耐用品新订单环比上升0.5%，同比大幅上升25%。日本3月失业率下降至2.6%。3月日本失业率较上月下降0.3个百分点至2.6%。韩国工业生产指数同环比均上升，工业持续回升。韩国3月工业生产指数同比上升5.7%，环比上升0.8%至112.6。美国工业材料生产持续上升。1)截止4月24日当周，美国周度粗钢产量同比上升43.6%，产能利用率较上周小幅上升0.4个百分点至78.4%;2)截止4月23日，美国炼油厂可运营能力利用率上升0.4个百分点至85.4%。美国当周初请失业金人数小幅下降，持续申领失业金人数小幅上升。4月24日当周美国初请失业金人数达55.3万人，环比上周下降1.3万人;4月17日当周持续申领失业金人数达366万人，环比上升0.9万人。4.贸易：美国3月进出口同比均大幅上升美国3月进出口同比均大幅上升。美国3月出口增速较上月大幅上升16.5个百分点至11.5%，进口同比20.6%。美国3月份商品贸易差额为-905.9亿美元。5.通胀和大宗商品：油价小幅上行4月28日当周EIA原油库存上升900万桶，美国原油产量小幅下降10万桶/日至1090万桶/日。截止4月29日，WTI原油周均价上升至63.2美元/桶;布油周均价上升至66.6美元/桶。6.房地产：美国3月成屋签约销售指数同比上升美国2月标普/CS房价指数连续8个月上涨。2月美国标普/CS房价指数同比上升11.9%至246.0，连续8个月上涨。美国3月成屋签约销售指数同比大幅23.3%，环比1.9%。日本3月新屋开工、营建订单大幅上行。日本3月新屋开工同比1.5%，环比18.1%，3月营建订单数同比12.5%，环比192.7%，涨幅达到近一年最高。美国5年期抵押贷款利率下降，15年期、30年期抵押贷款利率上升。截止4月29日当周，5年期抵押贷款利率下降0.2个百分点至2.6%，15年期、30年期抵押贷款利率分别上升至2.3%和3.0%。截止4月23日当周，美国MBA市场指数下降18.2至706.6，房市热度小幅回落。7.货币政策和汇率：美元指数下跌，黄金价格基本稳定本周美联储议息会议召开，鲍威尔发言偏鸽，美元指数下跌，黄金价格基本稳定。当地时间4月28日，美联储公布议息会议声明，鲍威尔在会后新闻发布会上表示看到实质性进展仍需一些时间，在此之前会维持当前的资产购买规模，现在还未到讨论Taper的时间，美元指数持续下行。截至4月29日，美元指数报收90.6140，较上周下行0.7%;欧元、英镑兑美元汇率(英镑汇率数据截至28日)分别报收1.2129、1.3906，分别较上周升值0.7%、贬值0.2%;由于加拿大央行率先Taper，加元走强，报收1.2292，较上周升值1.7%。本周伦敦金周均价1774.8美元/盎司，较上周基本稳定，同比涨幅较上周下行1.2pct至3.6%。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"ZBmain":0.9,".DJI":0.9,"ZTmain":0.9,"ZFmain":0.9,"ZNmain":0.9,"UBmain":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1655,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":101397235,"gmtCreate":1619842968227,"gmtModify":1704335673823,"author":{"id":"3536928846214760","authorId":"3536928846214760","name":"東海吉龍","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0ef8466588cf515f97a20c636e2be8a0","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3536928846214760","authorIdStr":"3536928846214760"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"666","listText":"666","text":"666","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/101397235","repostId":"2131557638","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2131557638","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"中国最具影响力的财经新闻媒体《财经》携手道琼斯媒体集团，引入百年历史的《巴伦》（Barron's）独家内容，打造涵盖全球金融信息、市场动态、行业分析、公司研究及理财顾问评估的全球投资平台。","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Barrons巴伦","id":"1063202233","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dd0fd02e1b0644cdbe57505e702dacab"},"pubTimestamp":1619837108,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2131557638?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-01 10:45","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"7 Reasons Why Value Stocks Are Not Over Yet","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2131557638","media":"Barrons巴伦","summary":"过去几周，价值股跑赢成长股的势头陷入停滞。美国银行策略师认为，价值股可能再次跑赢成长股，主要有以下7个原因。-过去价值股的跑赢行情会持续33个月，而近期出现的跑赢行情才刚刚过了七个月。在目前的分化程度下，价值股的涨幅往往会超过成长股。通常情况下，当价值股跑赢成长股时，幅度往往会达到60个百分点，但是目前价值股跑赢幅度仅为20个百分点。","content":"<p>Some investors are still taking a wait-and-see approach to value stocks, but they will soon see a new round of recovery. In the past few weeks, the momentum of value stocks outperforming growth stocks has stalled. But<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BAC\">Bank of America</a>Bank of America believes that this situation will soon change for many reasons.</p><p>Value stocks are more sensitive to changes in the economic situation than growth stocks. Therefore, when the upward momentum of US Treasury Bond yields slows down, the outperformance of value stocks also stagnates. This is because when the economy turns around, the inflation rate will rise, which will be reflected in the rise in long-term yields. An improved economy is beneficial to the profitability of value stocks.</p><p>When long-term yields decline, the valuation of growth stocks increases because most of the profits of growth stocks can only be realized in the future. When long-term yields decline, the value of future profits increases. The yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury Bond has fallen from 1.73% to 1.57% since mid-March, while the Russell 1000 Value Index has risen 2.5% over the same period, far below the Russell 1000 Growth Index's 7.3% gain.</p><p>Bank of America strategists believe that value stocks may outperform growth stocks again for the following seven main reasons.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bd0250cad5be414685082cf4dfad68ab\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"720\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>- Value stocks are still cheap. Compared to growth stocks, the average forward P/E of the Russell 1000 Value Index constituents remains below historical levels.</p><p>- In the past, value stocks would outperform for 33 months, but the recent outperformance has only been going on for seven months.</p><p>Compared to historical levels, the valuation divergence between value and growth stocks in the S&P 500 is significant, and the number of individual stocks involved is also greater. Given the current level of divergence, value stocks often outperform growth stocks.</p><p>- Value stocks still have room to outperform. Typically, when value stocks outperform growth stocks, the margin can reach 60 percentage points, but currently, value stocks outperform by only 20 percentage points.</p><p>Actively managed funds typically increase their holdings of value stocks when they outperform, but currently, value stocks still have a relatively low weighting among these funds. Energy and finance, two important value sectors, generally have the same weighting in actively managed funds as in index funds, but their weighting in actively managed funds is currently relatively low.</p><p>- Profits in S&P 500 constituent stocks are still accelerating, indicating that share prices are likely to rise. According to FactSet data, profits for S&P 500 constituents are expected to grow by 24% in the first quarter and 28% for the full year. It is certain that some expectations of profit growth have already been reflected in value stocks, but stock prices may rise further in the future.</p><p>- Finally, as the economy restarts, economic growth is expected to accelerate by mid-year. Bank of America stated that this means the United States may currently be in the middle stage of the economic cycle. Historical experience shows that value stocks tend to outperform growth stocks in the mid-cycle.</p><p>As the economic recovery accelerates, some investors remain cautious about value stocks, but they will soon see a new round of recovery.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>7 Reasons Why Value Stocks Are Not Over Yet</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n7 Reasons Why Value Stocks Are Not Over Yet\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1063202233\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/dd0fd02e1b0644cdbe57505e702dacab);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Barrons巴伦 </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-05-01 10:45</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Some investors are still taking a wait-and-see approach to value stocks, but they will soon see a new round of recovery. In the past few weeks, the momentum of value stocks outperforming growth stocks has stalled. But<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BAC\">Bank of America</a>Bank of America believes that this situation will soon change for many reasons.</p><p>Value stocks are more sensitive to changes in the economic situation than growth stocks. Therefore, when the upward momentum of US Treasury Bond yields slows down, the outperformance of value stocks also stagnates. This is because when the economy turns around, the inflation rate will rise, which will be reflected in the rise in long-term yields. An improved economy is beneficial to the profitability of value stocks.</p><p>When long-term yields decline, the valuation of growth stocks increases because most of the profits of growth stocks can only be realized in the future. When long-term yields decline, the value of future profits increases. The yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury Bond has fallen from 1.73% to 1.57% since mid-March, while the Russell 1000 Value Index has risen 2.5% over the same period, far below the Russell 1000 Growth Index's 7.3% gain.</p><p>Bank of America strategists believe that value stocks may outperform growth stocks again for the following seven main reasons.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bd0250cad5be414685082cf4dfad68ab\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"720\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>- Value stocks are still cheap. Compared to growth stocks, the average forward P/E of the Russell 1000 Value Index constituents remains below historical levels.</p><p>- In the past, value stocks would outperform for 33 months, but the recent outperformance has only been going on for seven months.</p><p>Compared to historical levels, the valuation divergence between value and growth stocks in the S&P 500 is significant, and the number of individual stocks involved is also greater. Given the current level of divergence, value stocks often outperform growth stocks.</p><p>- Value stocks still have room to outperform. Typically, when value stocks outperform growth stocks, the margin can reach 60 percentage points, but currently, value stocks outperform by only 20 percentage points.</p><p>Actively managed funds typically increase their holdings of value stocks when they outperform, but currently, value stocks still have a relatively low weighting among these funds. Energy and finance, two important value sectors, generally have the same weighting in actively managed funds as in index funds, but their weighting in actively managed funds is currently relatively low.</p><p>- Profits in S&P 500 constituent stocks are still accelerating, indicating that share prices are likely to rise. According to FactSet data, profits for S&P 500 constituents are expected to grow by 24% in the first quarter and 28% for the full year. It is certain that some expectations of profit growth have already been reflected in value stocks, but stock prices may rise further in the future.</p><p>- Finally, as the economy restarts, economic growth is expected to accelerate by mid-year. Bank of America stated that this means the United States may currently be in the middle stage of the economic cycle. Historical experience shows that value stocks tend to outperform growth stocks in the mid-cycle.</p><p>As the economic recovery accelerates, some investors remain cautious about value stocks, but they will soon see a new round of recovery.</p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c10b319311303e929760f86229735277","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2131557638","content_text":"一些投资者对价值股仍持观望态度，但价值股很快就会重新迎来新一轮回升势头。\n\n过去几周，价值股跑赢成长股的势头陷入停滞。但美国银行（Bank of America）认为，出于很多原因，这种情况很快会发生变化。\n价值股对经济形势变化的敏感程度比成长股高，因此当美国国债收益率上升势头放缓时，价值股的跑赢势头也陷入了停滞，这是由于而当经济迎来转机时，通胀率会上升，这会通过长期收益率的上升反映出来，而经济转好对价值股的盈利能力构成利好。\n而当长期收益率下降时，成长股的估值会上升，这是由于成长股大部分利润只能在未来实现，当长期收益率下降时，未来利润的价值就会上升。10年期美国国债收益率自3月中旬以来已从1.73%降至1.57%，而罗素1000价值股指数同期涨幅为2.5%，远低于罗素1000成长股指数7.3%的涨幅。\n美国银行策略师认为，价值股可能再次跑赢成长股，主要有以下7个原因。\n\n-价值股仍然很便宜。和成长股相比，罗素1000价值股指数成分股的平均远期市盈率仍低于历史水平。\n-过去价值股的跑赢行情会持续33个月，而近期出现的跑赢行情才刚刚过了七个月。\n-和历史水平相比，标普500指数中的价值股和成长股的估值分化非常大，涉及的个股数量也更多。在目前的分化程度下，价值股的涨幅往往会超过成长股。\n-价值股还有跑赢空间。通常情况下，当价值股跑赢成长股时，幅度往往会达到60个百分点，但是目前价值股跑赢幅度仅为20个百分点。\n-主动管理型基金在价值股跑赢时通常会增持价值股，但是目前来看，价值股在这类基金中的权重还比较低。能源和金融这两个重要的价值板块在主动型基金中的权重一般与在指数基金中的权重相同，但目前在主动型基金中的权重也较低。\n-标普500指数成分股的利润仍在加速增长，这表明股价有可能上涨。根据FactSet的数据，预计第一季度标普500指数成分股利润增长24%，全年利润增长28%。可以确定的是，利润增长的部分预期已经体现在价值股中，但接下来股价可能还会进一步上涨。\n-最后，随着经济重启，预计今年年中经济增长将会提速。美国银行表示，这意味着美国目前可能处于经济周期的中期阶段。而历史经验表明，在周期中期，价值股的表现往往优于成长股。\n随着经济复苏步伐的加快，一些投资者对价值股仍持观望态度，但价值股很快就会重新迎来新一轮回升势头。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".SPX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2097,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":109247446,"gmtCreate":1619702877185,"gmtModify":1704728271453,"author":{"id":"3536928846214760","authorId":"3536928846214760","name":"東海吉龍","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0ef8466588cf515f97a20c636e2be8a0","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3536928846214760","authorIdStr":"3536928846214760"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"666","listText":"666","text":"666","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/109247446","repostId":"1164804182","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1164804182","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1619698615,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1164804182?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-29 20:16","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"What chess is Biden playing behind \"robbing the rich and giving the poor\" for the infrastructure plan","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1164804182","media":"川阅全球宏观","summary":"第二弹具有缩减贫富差距、提高美国家庭福祉的特殊目标。","content":"<p>Author: Duan Meng Tao Chuan</p><p>On April 28th, Eastern Time, Biden delivered his first congressional speech since taking office, and announced the second \"American Family Plan\" of $1.8 trillion in infrastructure at the joint meeting of the two houses:<b>Investing about $1 trillion in 10 years + about $800 billion in tax cuts for families and workers, with human infrastructure investment at its core. All the infrastructure plans totaling about 4 trillion yuan have been revealed</b>。 Biden offered to raise taxes on the wealthy to fund the second infrastructure bomb,<b>The series of tax reforms for the wealthy (Table 1) is expected to raise about $1.5 trillion over a decade and ultimately allow for fewer tax loopholes for the wealthy and more opportunities for low-and middle-income Americans.</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3bfc2e9170b3d9ef1b4b6e31e2c16497\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"539\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>What is the difference between the second and first bombs of Biden's infrastructure?</b>The second bomb has the special goal of narrowing the gap between rich and poor and improving the well-being of American families. The first one focuses on improving the core competitiveness of the United States, which is of great strategic significance, mainly involving traditional infrastructure, research and development, green energy and other fields, while the second one focuses on education and social security, including childcare, paid leave, medical insurance, etc.</p><p><b>Why do you choose to increase capital gains taxes on the rich at this time?</b></p><p><b>In recent years, the tax difference between wage income and capital gains has been at a high of 17%, and a large number of wealthy people have transferred their income to capital gains to avoid taxes.</b>Diess, director of the White House National Economic Council, pointed out that since 2000, the tax rate for wealthy people earning> $60 million a year was only about 20 percent, lower than that of many middle-class people. About 70% of the average citizen's income comes from wages, while only about 30% of the wealthy earn ≥ $1 million a year, and the Top 1% of the wealthy account for 75% of the total long-term capital gains declarations (Figure 1). Increasing capital gains taxes on the wealthy to finance the \"American Family Plan\" can be described as robbing the rich and giving the poor.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/af037fe8e9152d998a716faadfddfa3e\" tg-width=\"999\" tg-height=\"698\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>To take history as a guide, President Reagan raised capital gains taxes to limit tax avoidance by the rich:</b>In the 1980s, the low capital gains tax rate made the rich invest heavily, generating interest and other deductions to reduce tax burden and reap long-term capital gains. Reagan's 1986 tax reform bill raised the capital gains tax rate and lowered the wage income tax rate, capping both at 28% (Figure 2), eliminating the tax rate difference and making the tax avoidance scheme unprofitable. This is consistent with the intention of the Biden administration.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dca46699479f6ce424d8456fa659ea68\" tg-width=\"981\" tg-height=\"596\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>How feasible is it to increase capital gains taxes on the wealthy? It is a bipartisan consensus and approved by the polls.</b></p><p>Mr. Diess recently said that the government had bipartisan support for raising funds and investing with higher returns by taxing the wealthy. According to Gallup poll data, more than 60% of Americans surveyed believe that the tax rate of the rich is too low (Figure 3), which shows that tax increases for the rich are recognized by the American public.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/51a26561f8d403091469f71d0729db6b\" tg-width=\"1002\" tg-height=\"611\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>Will Biden Infrastructure Plan Use Budget Reconciliation Process?</b>Yes. In anticipation of a clearer legislative strategy for the infrastructure scheme next month, we prefer to think that the infrastructure scheme will be adopted as a large scheme using a reconciliation process.</p><p><b>Impact of Biden's infrastructure plan on the economy?</b></p><p><b>There is no evidence that it will significantly affect long-term investments.</b>Corporate investment is mainly affected by the economic cycle, especially the aggregate market demand, and has little elasticity to tax rate. The Trump tax reform, which lowered the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, has not been effective in stimulating investment (Figure 4). In terms of capital gains tax, Diess said that most of the long-term investments come from tax-insensitive entities such as pension funds and sovereign wealth funds, so capital gains tax rates and investments do not show a clear correlation (Figure 5).</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f037481bdf356e2bf8d4f608286bbc25\" tg-width=\"1027\" tg-height=\"601\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4fd67ef94086e0cea357dd154629c8d2\" tg-width=\"762\" tg-height=\"693\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>The \"American Jobs Plan\" is expected to drive GDP by about 2% in the past decade.</b>According to the research of the Federal Reserve, the fiscal multiplier of infrastructure investment can be as high as x2. It is estimated that the \"American Employment Plan\" will drive the real GDP growth rate of the United States by about 0.2% every year on average in the next 10 years. In view of the pre-position of most investments, it will drive the GDP growth rate even more in the initial stage. In terms of debt, according to the latest calculation of Wharton Business School, the U.S. government debt will increase by 1.7% by 2031, but will decrease by 6.4% by 2050.</p><p><b>Risk warning:</b>The economy is in recession again as Covid virus mutation renders vaccines ineffective</p>","source":"lsy1582083733592","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>What chess is Biden playing behind \"robbing the rich and giving the poor\" for the infrastructure plan</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhat chess is Biden playing behind \"robbing the rich and giving the poor\" for the infrastructure plan\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">川阅全球宏观</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-04-29 20:16</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Author: Duan Meng Tao Chuan</p><p>On April 28th, Eastern Time, Biden delivered his first congressional speech since taking office, and announced the second \"American Family Plan\" of $1.8 trillion in infrastructure at the joint meeting of the two houses:<b>Investing about $1 trillion in 10 years + about $800 billion in tax cuts for families and workers, with human infrastructure investment at its core. All the infrastructure plans totaling about 4 trillion yuan have been revealed</b>。 Biden offered to raise taxes on the wealthy to fund the second infrastructure bomb,<b>The series of tax reforms for the wealthy (Table 1) is expected to raise about $1.5 trillion over a decade and ultimately allow for fewer tax loopholes for the wealthy and more opportunities for low-and middle-income Americans.</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3bfc2e9170b3d9ef1b4b6e31e2c16497\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"539\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>What is the difference between the second and first bombs of Biden's infrastructure?</b>The second bomb has the special goal of narrowing the gap between rich and poor and improving the well-being of American families. The first one focuses on improving the core competitiveness of the United States, which is of great strategic significance, mainly involving traditional infrastructure, research and development, green energy and other fields, while the second one focuses on education and social security, including childcare, paid leave, medical insurance, etc.</p><p><b>Why do you choose to increase capital gains taxes on the rich at this time?</b></p><p><b>In recent years, the tax difference between wage income and capital gains has been at a high of 17%, and a large number of wealthy people have transferred their income to capital gains to avoid taxes.</b>Diess, director of the White House National Economic Council, pointed out that since 2000, the tax rate for wealthy people earning> $60 million a year was only about 20 percent, lower than that of many middle-class people. About 70% of the average citizen's income comes from wages, while only about 30% of the wealthy earn ≥ $1 million a year, and the Top 1% of the wealthy account for 75% of the total long-term capital gains declarations (Figure 1). Increasing capital gains taxes on the wealthy to finance the \"American Family Plan\" can be described as robbing the rich and giving the poor.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/af037fe8e9152d998a716faadfddfa3e\" tg-width=\"999\" tg-height=\"698\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>To take history as a guide, President Reagan raised capital gains taxes to limit tax avoidance by the rich:</b>In the 1980s, the low capital gains tax rate made the rich invest heavily, generating interest and other deductions to reduce tax burden and reap long-term capital gains. Reagan's 1986 tax reform bill raised the capital gains tax rate and lowered the wage income tax rate, capping both at 28% (Figure 2), eliminating the tax rate difference and making the tax avoidance scheme unprofitable. This is consistent with the intention of the Biden administration.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dca46699479f6ce424d8456fa659ea68\" tg-width=\"981\" tg-height=\"596\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>How feasible is it to increase capital gains taxes on the wealthy? It is a bipartisan consensus and approved by the polls.</b></p><p>Mr. Diess recently said that the government had bipartisan support for raising funds and investing with higher returns by taxing the wealthy. According to Gallup poll data, more than 60% of Americans surveyed believe that the tax rate of the rich is too low (Figure 3), which shows that tax increases for the rich are recognized by the American public.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/51a26561f8d403091469f71d0729db6b\" tg-width=\"1002\" tg-height=\"611\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>Will Biden Infrastructure Plan Use Budget Reconciliation Process?</b>Yes. In anticipation of a clearer legislative strategy for the infrastructure scheme next month, we prefer to think that the infrastructure scheme will be adopted as a large scheme using a reconciliation process.</p><p><b>Impact of Biden's infrastructure plan on the economy?</b></p><p><b>There is no evidence that it will significantly affect long-term investments.</b>Corporate investment is mainly affected by the economic cycle, especially the aggregate market demand, and has little elasticity to tax rate. The Trump tax reform, which lowered the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, has not been effective in stimulating investment (Figure 4). In terms of capital gains tax, Diess said that most of the long-term investments come from tax-insensitive entities such as pension funds and sovereign wealth funds, so capital gains tax rates and investments do not show a clear correlation (Figure 5).</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f037481bdf356e2bf8d4f608286bbc25\" tg-width=\"1027\" tg-height=\"601\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4fd67ef94086e0cea357dd154629c8d2\" tg-width=\"762\" tg-height=\"693\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>The \"American Jobs Plan\" is expected to drive GDP by about 2% in the past decade.</b>According to the research of the Federal Reserve, the fiscal multiplier of infrastructure investment can be as high as x2. It is estimated that the \"American Employment Plan\" will drive the real GDP growth rate of the United States by about 0.2% every year on average in the next 10 years. In view of the pre-position of most investments, it will drive the GDP growth rate even more in the initial stage. In terms of debt, according to the latest calculation of Wharton Business School, the U.S. government debt will increase by 1.7% by 2031, but will decrease by 6.4% by 2050.</p><p><b>Risk warning:</b>The economy is in recession again as Covid virus mutation renders vaccines ineffective</p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"https://www.gelonghui.com/p/462955\">川阅全球宏观</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b723feb7135a01ca53f3c6edab4b9665","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.gelonghui.com/p/462955","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1164804182","content_text":"作者：段萌 陶川美国东部时间4月28日，拜登发表上任以来首次国会演说，在两院联席会议上公布1.8万亿美元的基建第二弹“美国家庭计划”：10年内投资约1万亿美元+家庭和工人约8000亿美元的减税额，核心为人力基础设施投资。总计约4万亿的基建计划至此全部揭晓。拜登提出对富人增税来为基建第二弹筹资，针对富人的系列税收改革（表1）预计将在十年内筹集约1.5万亿美元，并最终使得富人税收漏洞减少、中低收入美国人的机会增加。拜登基建第二弹和第一弹的差别是什么？第二弹具有缩减贫富差距、提高美国家庭福祉的特殊目标。第一弹着重于提高美国核心竞争力，极具战略意义，主要涉及传统基建、研发、绿色能源等领域，而第二弹着重于教育和社会保障，包括儿童保育、带薪假、医保等。为什么选择此时向富人增收资本利得税？近年来，工资收入与资本利得的税率差处在17%的高位，大量富人将收入转移至资本利得来避税。白宫国家经济委员会主任迪斯指出，2000年来，年收入>6000万美元的富人，税率仅约20%，低于许多中产阶级。普通民众约70%的收入来自工资，而年收入≥100万美元的富人仅约30%，收入Top 1%的富人占比长期资本利得申报总额的75%（图1）。对富人增收资本利得税来为“美国家庭计划”融资，可谓劫富济贫。以史为鉴，里根总统曾增收资本利得税以限制富人避税：80年代，低资本利得税率使得富人通过大量投资，产生利息等抵扣项以减少税负，收获长期资本利得。里根1986年税改法案提高资本利得税率、降低工资收入税率、将二者上限均设为28%（图2），消除税率差，使避税计划无利可图。这与拜登政府的初衷一致。对富人增收资本利得税的可行性如何？为两党共识，并受到民调认可。迪斯近期讲话，政府通过对富人征税筹资并进行更高回报的投资，受到了两党的支持。Gallup民调数据显示，超过60%的受访美国民众认为富人纳税比例过低（图3），可见对富人增税受到美国民众认可。拜登基建计划将使用预算和解程序吗？是的。预计在下个月基建计划的立法策略将变得更为清晰，我们偏向于认为基建计划将被作为一个大计划，使用一次和解程序通过。拜登基建计划对经济的影响？没有证据表明将会显著影响长期投资。公司投资主要受经济周期，尤其是市场总需求的影响，对税率的弹性不大。特朗普税改将公司税率从35%降至21%，但并未有效刺激投资（图4）。资本利得税方面，迪斯表示，长期投资大部分来自养老基金、主权财富基金等对税收不敏感的实体，因此资本利得税率和投资并未显示出明显的相关性（图5）。预计“美国就业计划”在近十年拉动GDP约2%。根据美联储的研究，基建投资的财政乘数可高至x2，预计“美国就业计划”在未来10年平均每年对美国实际GDP增速的拉动约为0.2%，鉴于多数投资前置，初期对GDP增速的拉动更大。债务方面，根据沃顿商学院最新测算，美国政府债务至2031年增加1.7%，但至2050年减少6.4%。风险提示：新冠病毒变异导致疫苗失效，经济再次陷入衰退","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1602,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":374212552,"gmtCreate":1619448102976,"gmtModify":1704724098062,"author":{"id":"3536928846214760","authorId":"3536928846214760","name":"東海吉龍","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0ef8466588cf515f97a20c636e2be8a0","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3536928846214760","authorIdStr":"3536928846214760"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"666","listText":"666","text":"666","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/374212552","repostId":"1112124246","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1112124246","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1619446921,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1112124246?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-26 22:22","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Copper prices soared to the highest level in a decade and the non-ferrous metals sector rose","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1112124246","media":"智通财经","summary":"高盛将未来12个月铜目标价提高到1.1万美元/吨。","content":"<p>On Monday, April 26, the non-ferrous metals sector rose during trading. As of press time,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FCX\">McMoran Copper Gold</a>It rose more than 6%.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AA\">Alcoa</a>It rose more than 5%.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TRQ\">Turquoise Hill Resources</a>It rose more than 4%, and Albert & Paykel Inc. rose more than 3%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4747a8a90284928bc8ab8f9768b760f4\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Previously, global copper prices soared to their highest level in a decade, with LME copper rising to $9,700 per ton at one point. Including<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GS\">Goldman Sachs</a>Other institutions believe that, given the important role of copper in the green energy transition, the climate goals of various countries will make this round of copper price rebound the beginning of a longer-term rise in copper prices.</p><p>Goldman Sachs has raised its 12-month copper price target to $11,000 per ton, up $500 from its reiterated 12-month copper price target two weeks ago, an increase of nearly 4.8%.</p>","source":"highlight_zhitongcaijin","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Copper prices soared to the highest level in a decade and the non-ferrous metals sector rose</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCopper prices soared to the highest level in a decade and the non-ferrous metals sector rose\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">智通财经</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-04-26 22:22</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>On Monday, April 26, the non-ferrous metals sector rose during trading. As of press time,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FCX\">McMoran Copper Gold</a>It rose more than 6%.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AA\">Alcoa</a>It rose more than 5%.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TRQ\">Turquoise Hill Resources</a>It rose more than 4%, and Albert & Paykel Inc. rose more than 3%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4747a8a90284928bc8ab8f9768b760f4\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Previously, global copper prices soared to their highest level in a decade, with LME copper rising to $9,700 per ton at one point. Including<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GS\">Goldman Sachs</a>Other institutions believe that, given the important role of copper in the green energy transition, the climate goals of various countries will make this round of copper price rebound the beginning of a longer-term rise in copper prices.</p><p>Goldman Sachs has raised its 12-month copper price target to $11,000 per ton, up $500 from its reiterated 12-month copper price target two weeks ago, an increase of nearly 4.8%.</p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"https://www.zhitongcaijing.com/content/detail/458639.html\">智通财经</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eeb9a4d452d8568bcc6a2558535ad160","relate_stocks":{"FCX":"麦克莫兰铜金","AA":"美国铝业"},"source_url":"https://www.zhitongcaijing.com/content/detail/458639.html","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/6ca2dcdccfa2217fb20a0351f4efe814","article_id":"1112124246","content_text":"4月26日(周一)，有色金属板块盘中走高，截至发稿，麦克莫兰铜金涨超6%，美国铝业涨超5%，Turquoise Hill Resources涨超4%，美国雅宝公司涨超3%。此前全球铜价飙升至十年来的最高水平，伦铜一度升至9700美元/吨。包括高盛等机构认为，考虑到铜在绿色能源转型中的重要作用，各国的气候目标将使本轮铜价反弹成为更长维度铜价上涨的开始。高盛将未来12个月铜目标价提高到1.1万美元/吨，较两周前其重申的12个月铜目标价上调500美元，升幅将近4.8%。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"FCX":0.9,"TRQ":0.9,"AA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1501,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":375314336,"gmtCreate":1619307943225,"gmtModify":1704722173437,"author":{"id":"3536928846214760","authorId":"3536928846214760","name":"東海吉龍","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0ef8466588cf515f97a20c636e2be8a0","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3536928846214760","authorIdStr":"3536928846214760"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"666","listText":"666","text":"666","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/375314336","repostId":"1130451341","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1130451341","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1619413290,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1130451341?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-26 13:01","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"The US dollar's massive monetary easing, global stimulus, and the strongest inflation have wiped out all living beings!","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1130451341","media":"华尔街见闻","summary":"1997年以色列的一场大会上，有人问弗里德曼，能不能一句话概括出经济学的精义，这位著作等身的经济学大师脱口而出，天下没有免费的午餐，这就是我经济理论的全部。反观当前，过去几周，美国财政刺激和货币宽松的","content":"<p>At a conference in Israel in 1997, someone asked Friedman if he could summarize the essence of economics in one sentence. The prolific economics guru blurted out, \"There is no such thing as a free lunch. That is the whole of my economic theory.\"</p><p>In contrast, in the past few weeks, the dual waves of fiscal stimulus and monetary easing in the United States have instantly shifted the attention of global markets from deflation to inflation, almost causing a bloodbath in the stock and bond markets. Last week, with Powell suddenly releasing hawkish signals in an interview, this feast is likely about to enter its second half.</p><p>Before everyone is truly bankrupt, someone must be prepared to pay the price. But how big is the order, and who will buy it?</p><p>As the United States gradually begins to buy global assets at rock-bottom prices, the US dollar has begun to flow back, and emerging markets have already taken the lead in setting off a wave of rate hike in order to withstand the shock. As the*of currency flows globally, it's time to reflect on former U.S. Treasury Secretary Connelly's words: The dollar is our currency, but it's your problem.</p><p>In this episode, we'll take a look at the ins and outs of this massive stimulus event in the United States. We will focus on three things:</p><p><b>First, why did the United States take such drastic measures when it launched unprecedented fiscal and monetary stimulus?</b></p><p><b>Second, could super-stimulus lead to a serious overheating of the U.S. economy?</b></p><p><b>Third, with the US introducing monetary easing and the world paying the price, how will this massive monetary easing end?</b></p><p><b>01. How intense is this round of stimulus from the United States?</b></p><p>How big is the fiscal stimulus? Following the $2.2 trillion fiscal stimulus package last April, the Trump administration introduced another $900 billion stimulus package at the end of the year. This year, Biden passed a $1.9 trillion stimulus bill, accounting for 10% of the US GDP last year, and the latest $2.25 trillion in infrastructure spending has been officially announced in the blink of an eye. Excluding the last item that has not yet been officially released, in just one year, the total amount of fiscal stimulus has reached a record 5 trillion yuan. In a longitudinal comparison, it is a full six times the nearly 800 billion yuan stimulus provided by the Obama administration in the two years following the 2008 financial crisis. In horizontal comparison, this figure accounts for 25% of US GDP, a proportion far exceeding that of Germany (12%) and Japan (16%).</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/62286730e1f021dfbeb1393d4e5fc201\" tg-width=\"553\" tg-height=\"235\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Regarding monetary policy, how big is this round of quantitative easing? During the 2008 financial crisis, the Federal Reserve spent six years using three rounds of quantitative easing, purchasing only a little over $3 trillion in assets. This time, however, it only took six months to easily reach this scale.</p><p>If the financial stimulus of 2008 was a shuriken in the left hand and a revolver in the right, this time it's a cannon firing two shots at once. But why is the US fiscal and monetary policy being ramped up to full capacity this time?</p><p>Let's look at the finances first. The latest passage of 1.9 trillion is very dramatic. This number far exceeded expectations, because when Biden initially proposed the plan, the Republican-backed stimulus figure was only over $600 billion, a difference of $1.3 trillion. Biden had previously claimed that the two parties should unite and cooperate, so everyone thought he would make a compromise, and the final stimulus package should only be around $900 billion.</p><p>Unexpectedly, Biden suddenly took a \"forceful\" approach, forcing through a plan called the \"budget reconciliation process\". Simply put, it significantly reduces the number of votes the Senate would normally need to pass a stimulus bill, requiring only a majority. Therefore, when the $1.9 trillion bill is voted on in the future, even if the Republicans unanimously oppose it, the Democrats, who hold the majority in the Senate, will be able to forcefully shake off the Republicans and push the bill forward on their own.</p><p>The question is, why did Biden suddenly disregard Republican opposition and rush to quickly seal the $1.9 trillion deal?</p><p>Because during the 2008 financial crisis, Obama's Democratic Party suffered heavily from fiscal stimulus.</p><p>Twelve years ago, it was precisely because of Republican opposition that the Obama administration's fiscal stimulus package was significantly scaled back, and the original $2 trillion stimulus package ultimately passed less than $800 billion.</p><p>However, it's important to understand that this small amount of money is far from enough to lead to a rapid economic recovery. Over the next two years, the US economy grew slowly, the job market recovery stagnated, Obama's popular approval rating plummeted, and he quickly lost the House of Representatives in the 2010 election, allowing the Republicans to regain control.</p><p>It can be said that in the last crisis, it was precisely because the Obama administration was not tough enough that not only caused the Democratic Party to lose power, but also kept the US economy mired in the quagmire for longer.</p><p>Biden, as Obama's deputy at the time, clearly remembers this lesson deeply. So after he came to power, he went all out and confronted them head-on, afraid of repeating the mistakes he made back then.</p><p>What about quantitative easing? Based on the above facts, the QE in 2009 was a \"second-best option\" made by the United States when fiscal policy was constrained by the Republican Party. Now that there is already a massive amount of stimulus, why is Powell still insisting on not exiting QE?</p><p>We believe there are roughly three reasons:</p><p>First, Powell never believed there would be truly serious inflationary pressures. As he said not long ago at a hearing of the U.S. House Financial Services Committee, global deflation has lasted for more than 20 years. How could it get out of control in just one inflation?</p><p>Second, even with inflationary pressures, the United States does not have to bear the consequences of inflation alone due to the US dollar's reserve currency status. We'll get to that later.</p><p>Third, the Federal Reserve is more concerned about deflationary expectations than inflationary pressures.</p><p>Deflation is when the inflation rate drops below zero, and society as a whole is in an environment where prices continue to decline.</p><p>Once people have an expectation that prices will continue to fall, they will save what they want to buy for a cheaper time in the future. For example, if you want to buy a house, and the current price is 50,000 yuan per square meter, but you expect it to become 40,000 yuan per square meter in two years, then if conditions permit, it will definitely be more cost-effective to buy in two years. The same logic applies to businesses purchasing raw materials and making investments.</p><p>In this way, the desire to consume and invest is greatly reduced, and no matter how much money you have, it will be of no use. More than 60% of the US GDP comes from consumption. With insufficient demand, production naturally cannot increase, and the economy can only stagnate. Just look at Japan's \"lost 20 years\" to see how terrible the whole process is.</p><p>In the short term, QE is definitely a powerful medicine to alleviate deflationary expectations. It only needs to do one thing: push up asset prices, especially in the stock and housing markets, thereby creating the illusion of wealth and a thriving economy. Even if it doesn't translate into real cash flow, people may happily consume more, thereby stimulating production and economic recovery. This is entirely a psychological question, and it works especially well when coordinated with fiscal policy.</p><p>However, we should not confuse a bull market with a strong real economy. Is QE a short-sighted measure to quench thirst, and will it backfire on the economy in the future? That's a story for later; we'll talk about it below.</p><p><b>02. The US economy may be overheating.</b></p><p>As we just explained, the scale of this fiscal and monetary stimulus in the United States is unprecedented. So what will happen to the US economy under such massive stimulus? The answer is that inflation is rising and the economy is overheating, and the overheating may be much more severe than the market expects. Because of the prolonged and large-scale quantitative easing (QE), inflation has unknowingly been given huge upside potential.</p><p>To understand the impact of long-term QE, we will first explain the entire transmission path of the central bank's monetary policy for macroeconomic regulation in the simplest way possible. Let's return to a \"prehistoric\" world without QE and see how the monetary policy system operates under normal circumstances; With QE now in place, how has the operating model changed?</p><p>We often say that the central bank scatters money, but the money is definitely not scattered directly on the people. Instead, it is first scattered to commercial banks and other financial institutions, forming the base money. There are many methods, including adjusting the rediscount rate and the reserve requirement ratio. One of them is the buying and selling of government bonds, which is most related to QE. When the central bank buys bonds, it pays a sum of money, which is essentially injecting a base currency into the financial system.</p><p>Next, banks either invest this money in the real economy, or lend it to businesses and families through loans to enable them to produce and consume, thereby promoting economic growth. Alternatively, if most businesses and families are unwilling to borrow money, the remaining money will remain in the form of savings within the banking system or flow into financial markets such as the stock market. On the one hand, the development of the real economy lacks funding, and on the other hand, the financial market may accumulate excessive funds, triggering a bubble.</p><p>In the world before QE, monetary policy followed the above path very smoothly, namely, the liquidity provided by the Federal Reserve through conventional monetary policy could be well transmitted to businesses and residents. During an economic recession, a proactive fiscal policy stabilizes the confidence of businesses and residents, while the central bank lowers policy interest rates and provides liquidity to the banking industry. When commercial banks have money, residents and businesses are also encouraged by low interest rates and fiscal stimulus to actively borrow money to buy houses and invest.</p><p>Once the economy begins to recover, what the central bank needs to do is gradually raise policy interest rates and curb credit, thereby preventing inflation. As can be seen from the chart, textbooks on the three lines of base money, money supply, and bank credit generally rise and fall at the same time. In this process, long-term interest rates also decline and rebound along with the policy interest rate. The US and Europe before 2008, and Japan before 1990, were in this state.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5db62c0fd67426e30d8e887c264e2c1d\" tg-width=\"553\" tg-height=\"205\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>However, QE broke this situation. As we just mentioned, after the real estate bubble burst in 2008, due to ineffective fiscal stimulus, the United States had to take a one-sided approach, using monetary policy QE to release a large amount of liquidity in an attempt to stimulate domestic demand, but it had little effect on the severely affected families and businesses. After collateral prices plummeted, people were not only unwilling to borrow money, but also had a large amount of debt waiting to be repaid.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5df372cd565af39ad4d6bcb81d7c6d0\" tg-width=\"553\" tg-height=\"438\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>As a result, on the one hand, with the expansion of QE and the drop in interest rates to 0, liquidity in the United States reached an unprecedented level, and the proportion of base money in GDP rose from 6% in 2008 to 25%. On the other hand, people hold huge amounts of savings but do not spend them. The funds not only do not leave the banking industry in the form of loans, but also go back in the form of savings and loan repayments (Figure 1), causing the economy and inflation to remain stagnant (Figure 2).</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/519c94b8f058459bc94057a57c4e4bcd\" tg-width=\"553\" tg-height=\"265\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c4531164bb26df43688035a5cf421b70\" tg-width=\"553\" tg-height=\"282\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>In other words, if the entire monetary system continues to operate according to the pre-2008 model, inflation in the United States should have risen to a very high level by now. If we compare the money sprayed by the central bank to water, the current price is like a sponge covered in a layer of rubber that is difficult to absorb water. Once the rubber is peeled off, the sponge will quickly absorb water and expand. So we can see what will happen once demand improves and people start borrowing again: bank credit and money supply could be several times higher than they are now, and prices could rise sharply, which would mean very high inflation.</p><p>Under this expectation, once the economy shows signs of recovery, high tensions over inflationary pressures will exacerbate market panic about liquidity fluctuations. Investors worry that the central bank will have to reduce its bond purchases or even sell long-term bonds, so they are also selling bonds to avoid risks. As a result, long-term interest rates in countries with QE will rise at a faster pace than without QE, further causing severe fluctuations in the real economy, stock markets, and commodity markets.</p><p>The longer QE lasts, the more serious these problems will undoubtedly become. During the Federal Reserve's third round of quantitative easing in 2013, Koo Chao-ming, chief researcher at Nomura Securities, proposed a \"quantitative easing Trap\" model to discuss the extent of economic damage caused by prolonged quantitative easing.</p><p>Initially, the decline in long-term interest rates in QE countries was much greater than in non-QE countries, meaning that the economic recovery was subsequently faster (t1). However, as the economy recovered and monetary policy tightened, long-term interest rates rose rapidly, and some interest rate-sensitive industries faced declining demand, forcing the central bank to relax its policy stance again. After the economy recovered again, as the market refocused on the possibility of central banks absorbing excess reserves, long-term interest rates rose in a repeating cycle known as the \"QE Trap\".</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/95fcf876d04c9fa79632dabb02901fe9\" tg-width=\"553\" tg-height=\"367\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>In contrast, the decline in long-term interest rates in non-QE countries was gradual, which delayed the start of recovery (t2); But once the economy starts to improve, the pace of recovery will actually be faster due to lower interest rates.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c252a193b242e7b67bb52a022f673936\" tg-width=\"553\" tg-height=\"415\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>We can also draw this conclusion from the seven years of experience of gradually normalizing monetary policy in the United States before the pandemic. The last round of QE in the United States was gradually withdrawn in 2013, but what will happen if it is not withdrawn? Will the economy be better? Maybe not.</p><p>When the Federal Reserve first started tapering its bond purchases, the inflation rate was only 1%. Although there were nine rate hike and quantitative tightening (QT) began in October 2017, the inflation rate continued to rise slowly. The reason that deeply suppresses inflation and keeps it rising slowly is the same: the savings held by households and businesses have not been digested, and they have not borrowed money, so rising interest rates do not put pressure on them. This, in turn, suggests that even if interest rates remained low at the time, economic activity may have remained unmoved.</p><p>Moreover, due to insufficient demand in the real economy, continued QE may actually lead to a large amount of spare money entering the real estate and financial markets, triggering a thick asset bubble. In fact, U.S. commercial real estate prices are now 50% higher than their previous peak in 2007.</p><p>Importantly, given that this round of quantitative easing is much more rapid than during the financial crisis, Koo Chao-ming believes in a recent research report that the US economy has already stepped halfway into the \"quantitative easing Trap.\" Once the private sector resumes borrowing, soaring inflation and soaring long-term bond interest rates are imminent, at which point it will be necessary to significantly increase policy interest rates to suppress inflation. In a prehistoric world without QE in the late 1970s, the Federal Reserve raised its policy interest rate sharply to 22% to curb inflation. What level is needed now?</p><p><b>03. The US introduced monetary easing, and the world paid the price. How will this massive monetary easing end?</b></p><p>We just discussed the impact of massive monetary easing on the US economy. Due to the existence of dollar hegemony, the influence of US economic policies is by no means limited to the United States itself. Through a series of transmission mechanisms, this round of economic stimulus in the United States has a far-reaching impact and is very likely to make the whole world pay for Americans.</p><p>Emerging markets are likely to pay the biggest price, as has always been the case, and this may be one of the reasons for the United States' reckless monetary easing.</p><p>In 2020, as the circulation of the US dollar, the global reserve currency, surged, countries began to ease monetary policy to combat inflation caused by the excessive issuance of currency by the United States, which in turn exported inflation to the world. This is directly reflected in the increase in housing prices in various countries. OECD data shows that housing prices rose in 89% of countries around the world last year, the highest percentage since 2000, with Turkey and Russia in particular seeing increases of more than 20%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/75c4ae79984d71e542068e5f4451b545\" tg-width=\"553\" tg-height=\"334\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Now, with the strengthening of US inflation expectations, the sharp rise in US Treasury yields, and the misalignment of the recovery pace between the US and emerging market countries, the US dollar has begun to strengthen in stages and is showing a return trend, completely reversing the situation. Emerging markets are forced to repeat the old adage: Americans print money, and the whole world pays for it.</p><p>Since March, emerging market countries have collectively \"rushed\" to rate hike ahead of the Federal Reserve's actions. In the short week leading up to and around the US interest rate meeting in March, several emerging market countries experienced a wave of rate hike:</p><p>On March 17, the Central Bank of Brazil announced an increase in the benchmark lending rate by 75 basis points to 2.75% (compared to an expected 50 basis points).</p><p>On March 18, the Central Bank of Türkiye announced that it would raise its key interest rate by 200 basis points to 19% (compared to the expected increase to 18%).</p><p>On March 19, the Central Bank of Russia announced a rate hike rate of 25 basis points to 4.50% (expected to remain at 4.25%).</p><p>Moreover, indicators from emerging countries such as India, Argentina, Malaysia, Thailand, and South Korea all show that market expectations for rate hike are increasing, with rate hike expected to occur at least once this year and the first half of next year.</p><p>The main reason driving rate hike in emerging market countries is certainly rising inflation. From a general analysis, inflationary pressures still originate from the supply side. On the one hand, the downstream consumer goods production capacity of these emerging market countries is already weak, and the impact of the pandemic has widened the supply and demand gap, which is directly reflected in pushing up commodity prices. On the other hand, food and transportation consumption account for more than 40-50% of these countries and they rely on imports and exports. Therefore, the rapid rise in global petroleum product and food prices has further increased the imported inflationary pressure on emerging market countries.</p><p>Chart: Inflation level reaches target policy area</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e94ce07a7037fde2b973d9eb87b28c31\" tg-width=\"553\" tg-height=\"218\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>These emerging market countries, which are highly open and dependent on foreign trade, can only passively accept the spillover of the economies and policies of developed countries to a large extent. However, compared to rising inflation, the economic recovery of these emerging countries is still in a relatively slow process, especially Brazil and Türkiye, where unemployment rates are high at over 10%, and the control of the pandemic is once again facing challenges.</p><p>Chart: Economic recovery will take time</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2f81cda958ecf4d254726ed35cd77803\" tg-width=\"553\" tg-height=\"204\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>At the same time, in order to prevent a vicious circle expectations of an excessively rapid return of the US dollar, currency depreciation, hyperinflation, domestic rate hike, falling asset prices, and exposure of foreign debt, emerging market countries had to take the lead in launching rate hike, firstly to curb bubbles and secondly to stabilize capital outflows.</p><p>Chart: The largest appreciation of currencies relative to the US dollar last year</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f5087af222bd88b05f938b86843362cc\" tg-width=\"553\" tg-height=\"234\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Countries with high external debt ratios and significant asset market gains may pay a greater price. Turkey's overnight lending rate has remained above 15% this year, making it difficult to curb international capital outflows. The resignation of the central bank governor following better-than-expected rate hike has further triggered a vicious circle expectations, causing asset prices to plummet and the currency to collapse. In terms of external debt, Chile and South Africa are next.</p><p>High inflation, especially in countries with high asset price increases, indicates that more capital is flowing into the virtual economy than into the recovery of the real economy, and there is also a significant risk of capital outflow. For example, Argentina and India. In these countries, rate hike is more about choosing the lesser of two evils, and there is not much independence in monetary policy. If there is a rapid outflow of capital, they will pay the price for last year's liquidity feast.</p><p>In the United States, as funds flow back and arbitrage trading between the US and Europe increases demand for US Treasury bonds, the upward pressure on US Treasury yields will actually ease.</p><p>Chart: The interest rate differential between Europe and the United States widens to the mean level</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/17f074dd3e16aa39866470bd4c68767c\" tg-width=\"553\" tg-height=\"294\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>As the dollar rises and falls, China, as the largest emerging market country, will withstand some shocks thanks to its domestic supply capacity, liquidity restraint, and currency independence. However, under the global storm, asset price pressures are unlikely to ease.</p><p>Perhaps money can exceed printing, but wealth cannot. When we look at the current state of global money from a more macro perspective, a deeper question is how to make good use of our policy tools, and how individuals can identify good assets to ensure that our wages are more stably preserved. By understanding the historical responsibility of the RMB and its value in keeping a low profile, we may be able to prepare for the upcoming risks.</p>","source":"highlight_wallstreetcn","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The US dollar's massive monetary easing, global stimulus, and the strongest inflation have wiped out all living beings!</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe US dollar's massive monetary easing, global stimulus, and the strongest inflation have wiped out all living beings!\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">华尔街见闻</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-04-26 13:01</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>At a conference in Israel in 1997, someone asked Friedman if he could summarize the essence of economics in one sentence. The prolific economics guru blurted out, \"There is no such thing as a free lunch. That is the whole of my economic theory.\"</p><p>In contrast, in the past few weeks, the dual waves of fiscal stimulus and monetary easing in the United States have instantly shifted the attention of global markets from deflation to inflation, almost causing a bloodbath in the stock and bond markets. Last week, with Powell suddenly releasing hawkish signals in an interview, this feast is likely about to enter its second half.</p><p>Before everyone is truly bankrupt, someone must be prepared to pay the price. But how big is the order, and who will buy it?</p><p>As the United States gradually begins to buy global assets at rock-bottom prices, the US dollar has begun to flow back, and emerging markets have already taken the lead in setting off a wave of rate hike in order to withstand the shock. As the*of currency flows globally, it's time to reflect on former U.S. Treasury Secretary Connelly's words: The dollar is our currency, but it's your problem.</p><p>In this episode, we'll take a look at the ins and outs of this massive stimulus event in the United States. We will focus on three things:</p><p><b>First, why did the United States take such drastic measures when it launched unprecedented fiscal and monetary stimulus?</b></p><p><b>Second, could super-stimulus lead to a serious overheating of the U.S. economy?</b></p><p><b>Third, with the US introducing monetary easing and the world paying the price, how will this massive monetary easing end?</b></p><p><b>01. How intense is this round of stimulus from the United States?</b></p><p>How big is the fiscal stimulus? Following the $2.2 trillion fiscal stimulus package last April, the Trump administration introduced another $900 billion stimulus package at the end of the year. This year, Biden passed a $1.9 trillion stimulus bill, accounting for 10% of the US GDP last year, and the latest $2.25 trillion in infrastructure spending has been officially announced in the blink of an eye. Excluding the last item that has not yet been officially released, in just one year, the total amount of fiscal stimulus has reached a record 5 trillion yuan. In a longitudinal comparison, it is a full six times the nearly 800 billion yuan stimulus provided by the Obama administration in the two years following the 2008 financial crisis. In horizontal comparison, this figure accounts for 25% of US GDP, a proportion far exceeding that of Germany (12%) and Japan (16%).</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/62286730e1f021dfbeb1393d4e5fc201\" tg-width=\"553\" tg-height=\"235\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Regarding monetary policy, how big is this round of quantitative easing? During the 2008 financial crisis, the Federal Reserve spent six years using three rounds of quantitative easing, purchasing only a little over $3 trillion in assets. This time, however, it only took six months to easily reach this scale.</p><p>If the financial stimulus of 2008 was a shuriken in the left hand and a revolver in the right, this time it's a cannon firing two shots at once. But why is the US fiscal and monetary policy being ramped up to full capacity this time?</p><p>Let's look at the finances first. The latest passage of 1.9 trillion is very dramatic. This number far exceeded expectations, because when Biden initially proposed the plan, the Republican-backed stimulus figure was only over $600 billion, a difference of $1.3 trillion. Biden had previously claimed that the two parties should unite and cooperate, so everyone thought he would make a compromise, and the final stimulus package should only be around $900 billion.</p><p>Unexpectedly, Biden suddenly took a \"forceful\" approach, forcing through a plan called the \"budget reconciliation process\". Simply put, it significantly reduces the number of votes the Senate would normally need to pass a stimulus bill, requiring only a majority. Therefore, when the $1.9 trillion bill is voted on in the future, even if the Republicans unanimously oppose it, the Democrats, who hold the majority in the Senate, will be able to forcefully shake off the Republicans and push the bill forward on their own.</p><p>The question is, why did Biden suddenly disregard Republican opposition and rush to quickly seal the $1.9 trillion deal?</p><p>Because during the 2008 financial crisis, Obama's Democratic Party suffered heavily from fiscal stimulus.</p><p>Twelve years ago, it was precisely because of Republican opposition that the Obama administration's fiscal stimulus package was significantly scaled back, and the original $2 trillion stimulus package ultimately passed less than $800 billion.</p><p>However, it's important to understand that this small amount of money is far from enough to lead to a rapid economic recovery. Over the next two years, the US economy grew slowly, the job market recovery stagnated, Obama's popular approval rating plummeted, and he quickly lost the House of Representatives in the 2010 election, allowing the Republicans to regain control.</p><p>It can be said that in the last crisis, it was precisely because the Obama administration was not tough enough that not only caused the Democratic Party to lose power, but also kept the US economy mired in the quagmire for longer.</p><p>Biden, as Obama's deputy at the time, clearly remembers this lesson deeply. So after he came to power, he went all out and confronted them head-on, afraid of repeating the mistakes he made back then.</p><p>What about quantitative easing? Based on the above facts, the QE in 2009 was a \"second-best option\" made by the United States when fiscal policy was constrained by the Republican Party. Now that there is already a massive amount of stimulus, why is Powell still insisting on not exiting QE?</p><p>We believe there are roughly three reasons:</p><p>First, Powell never believed there would be truly serious inflationary pressures. As he said not long ago at a hearing of the U.S. House Financial Services Committee, global deflation has lasted for more than 20 years. How could it get out of control in just one inflation?</p><p>Second, even with inflationary pressures, the United States does not have to bear the consequences of inflation alone due to the US dollar's reserve currency status. We'll get to that later.</p><p>Third, the Federal Reserve is more concerned about deflationary expectations than inflationary pressures.</p><p>Deflation is when the inflation rate drops below zero, and society as a whole is in an environment where prices continue to decline.</p><p>Once people have an expectation that prices will continue to fall, they will save what they want to buy for a cheaper time in the future. For example, if you want to buy a house, and the current price is 50,000 yuan per square meter, but you expect it to become 40,000 yuan per square meter in two years, then if conditions permit, it will definitely be more cost-effective to buy in two years. The same logic applies to businesses purchasing raw materials and making investments.</p><p>In this way, the desire to consume and invest is greatly reduced, and no matter how much money you have, it will be of no use. More than 60% of the US GDP comes from consumption. With insufficient demand, production naturally cannot increase, and the economy can only stagnate. Just look at Japan's \"lost 20 years\" to see how terrible the whole process is.</p><p>In the short term, QE is definitely a powerful medicine to alleviate deflationary expectations. It only needs to do one thing: push up asset prices, especially in the stock and housing markets, thereby creating the illusion of wealth and a thriving economy. Even if it doesn't translate into real cash flow, people may happily consume more, thereby stimulating production and economic recovery. This is entirely a psychological question, and it works especially well when coordinated with fiscal policy.</p><p>However, we should not confuse a bull market with a strong real economy. Is QE a short-sighted measure to quench thirst, and will it backfire on the economy in the future? That's a story for later; we'll talk about it below.</p><p><b>02. The US economy may be overheating.</b></p><p>As we just explained, the scale of this fiscal and monetary stimulus in the United States is unprecedented. So what will happen to the US economy under such massive stimulus? The answer is that inflation is rising and the economy is overheating, and the overheating may be much more severe than the market expects. Because of the prolonged and large-scale quantitative easing (QE), inflation has unknowingly been given huge upside potential.</p><p>To understand the impact of long-term QE, we will first explain the entire transmission path of the central bank's monetary policy for macroeconomic regulation in the simplest way possible. Let's return to a \"prehistoric\" world without QE and see how the monetary policy system operates under normal circumstances; With QE now in place, how has the operating model changed?</p><p>We often say that the central bank scatters money, but the money is definitely not scattered directly on the people. Instead, it is first scattered to commercial banks and other financial institutions, forming the base money. There are many methods, including adjusting the rediscount rate and the reserve requirement ratio. One of them is the buying and selling of government bonds, which is most related to QE. When the central bank buys bonds, it pays a sum of money, which is essentially injecting a base currency into the financial system.</p><p>Next, banks either invest this money in the real economy, or lend it to businesses and families through loans to enable them to produce and consume, thereby promoting economic growth. Alternatively, if most businesses and families are unwilling to borrow money, the remaining money will remain in the form of savings within the banking system or flow into financial markets such as the stock market. On the one hand, the development of the real economy lacks funding, and on the other hand, the financial market may accumulate excessive funds, triggering a bubble.</p><p>In the world before QE, monetary policy followed the above path very smoothly, namely, the liquidity provided by the Federal Reserve through conventional monetary policy could be well transmitted to businesses and residents. During an economic recession, a proactive fiscal policy stabilizes the confidence of businesses and residents, while the central bank lowers policy interest rates and provides liquidity to the banking industry. When commercial banks have money, residents and businesses are also encouraged by low interest rates and fiscal stimulus to actively borrow money to buy houses and invest.</p><p>Once the economy begins to recover, what the central bank needs to do is gradually raise policy interest rates and curb credit, thereby preventing inflation. As can be seen from the chart, textbooks on the three lines of base money, money supply, and bank credit generally rise and fall at the same time. In this process, long-term interest rates also decline and rebound along with the policy interest rate. The US and Europe before 2008, and Japan before 1990, were in this state.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5db62c0fd67426e30d8e887c264e2c1d\" tg-width=\"553\" tg-height=\"205\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>However, QE broke this situation. As we just mentioned, after the real estate bubble burst in 2008, due to ineffective fiscal stimulus, the United States had to take a one-sided approach, using monetary policy QE to release a large amount of liquidity in an attempt to stimulate domestic demand, but it had little effect on the severely affected families and businesses. After collateral prices plummeted, people were not only unwilling to borrow money, but also had a large amount of debt waiting to be repaid.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5df372cd565af39ad4d6bcb81d7c6d0\" tg-width=\"553\" tg-height=\"438\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>As a result, on the one hand, with the expansion of QE and the drop in interest rates to 0, liquidity in the United States reached an unprecedented level, and the proportion of base money in GDP rose from 6% in 2008 to 25%. On the other hand, people hold huge amounts of savings but do not spend them. The funds not only do not leave the banking industry in the form of loans, but also go back in the form of savings and loan repayments (Figure 1), causing the economy and inflation to remain stagnant (Figure 2).</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/519c94b8f058459bc94057a57c4e4bcd\" tg-width=\"553\" tg-height=\"265\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c4531164bb26df43688035a5cf421b70\" tg-width=\"553\" tg-height=\"282\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>In other words, if the entire monetary system continues to operate according to the pre-2008 model, inflation in the United States should have risen to a very high level by now. If we compare the money sprayed by the central bank to water, the current price is like a sponge covered in a layer of rubber that is difficult to absorb water. Once the rubber is peeled off, the sponge will quickly absorb water and expand. So we can see what will happen once demand improves and people start borrowing again: bank credit and money supply could be several times higher than they are now, and prices could rise sharply, which would mean very high inflation.</p><p>Under this expectation, once the economy shows signs of recovery, high tensions over inflationary pressures will exacerbate market panic about liquidity fluctuations. Investors worry that the central bank will have to reduce its bond purchases or even sell long-term bonds, so they are also selling bonds to avoid risks. As a result, long-term interest rates in countries with QE will rise at a faster pace than without QE, further causing severe fluctuations in the real economy, stock markets, and commodity markets.</p><p>The longer QE lasts, the more serious these problems will undoubtedly become. During the Federal Reserve's third round of quantitative easing in 2013, Koo Chao-ming, chief researcher at Nomura Securities, proposed a \"quantitative easing Trap\" model to discuss the extent of economic damage caused by prolonged quantitative easing.</p><p>Initially, the decline in long-term interest rates in QE countries was much greater than in non-QE countries, meaning that the economic recovery was subsequently faster (t1). However, as the economy recovered and monetary policy tightened, long-term interest rates rose rapidly, and some interest rate-sensitive industries faced declining demand, forcing the central bank to relax its policy stance again. After the economy recovered again, as the market refocused on the possibility of central banks absorbing excess reserves, long-term interest rates rose in a repeating cycle known as the \"QE Trap\".</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/95fcf876d04c9fa79632dabb02901fe9\" tg-width=\"553\" tg-height=\"367\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>In contrast, the decline in long-term interest rates in non-QE countries was gradual, which delayed the start of recovery (t2); But once the economy starts to improve, the pace of recovery will actually be faster due to lower interest rates.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c252a193b242e7b67bb52a022f673936\" tg-width=\"553\" tg-height=\"415\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>We can also draw this conclusion from the seven years of experience of gradually normalizing monetary policy in the United States before the pandemic. The last round of QE in the United States was gradually withdrawn in 2013, but what will happen if it is not withdrawn? Will the economy be better? Maybe not.</p><p>When the Federal Reserve first started tapering its bond purchases, the inflation rate was only 1%. Although there were nine rate hike and quantitative tightening (QT) began in October 2017, the inflation rate continued to rise slowly. The reason that deeply suppresses inflation and keeps it rising slowly is the same: the savings held by households and businesses have not been digested, and they have not borrowed money, so rising interest rates do not put pressure on them. This, in turn, suggests that even if interest rates remained low at the time, economic activity may have remained unmoved.</p><p>Moreover, due to insufficient demand in the real economy, continued QE may actually lead to a large amount of spare money entering the real estate and financial markets, triggering a thick asset bubble. In fact, U.S. commercial real estate prices are now 50% higher than their previous peak in 2007.</p><p>Importantly, given that this round of quantitative easing is much more rapid than during the financial crisis, Koo Chao-ming believes in a recent research report that the US economy has already stepped halfway into the \"quantitative easing Trap.\" Once the private sector resumes borrowing, soaring inflation and soaring long-term bond interest rates are imminent, at which point it will be necessary to significantly increase policy interest rates to suppress inflation. In a prehistoric world without QE in the late 1970s, the Federal Reserve raised its policy interest rate sharply to 22% to curb inflation. What level is needed now?</p><p><b>03. The US introduced monetary easing, and the world paid the price. How will this massive monetary easing end?</b></p><p>We just discussed the impact of massive monetary easing on the US economy. Due to the existence of dollar hegemony, the influence of US economic policies is by no means limited to the United States itself. Through a series of transmission mechanisms, this round of economic stimulus in the United States has a far-reaching impact and is very likely to make the whole world pay for Americans.</p><p>Emerging markets are likely to pay the biggest price, as has always been the case, and this may be one of the reasons for the United States' reckless monetary easing.</p><p>In 2020, as the circulation of the US dollar, the global reserve currency, surged, countries began to ease monetary policy to combat inflation caused by the excessive issuance of currency by the United States, which in turn exported inflation to the world. This is directly reflected in the increase in housing prices in various countries. OECD data shows that housing prices rose in 89% of countries around the world last year, the highest percentage since 2000, with Turkey and Russia in particular seeing increases of more than 20%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/75c4ae79984d71e542068e5f4451b545\" tg-width=\"553\" tg-height=\"334\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Now, with the strengthening of US inflation expectations, the sharp rise in US Treasury yields, and the misalignment of the recovery pace between the US and emerging market countries, the US dollar has begun to strengthen in stages and is showing a return trend, completely reversing the situation. Emerging markets are forced to repeat the old adage: Americans print money, and the whole world pays for it.</p><p>Since March, emerging market countries have collectively \"rushed\" to rate hike ahead of the Federal Reserve's actions. In the short week leading up to and around the US interest rate meeting in March, several emerging market countries experienced a wave of rate hike:</p><p>On March 17, the Central Bank of Brazil announced an increase in the benchmark lending rate by 75 basis points to 2.75% (compared to an expected 50 basis points).</p><p>On March 18, the Central Bank of Türkiye announced that it would raise its key interest rate by 200 basis points to 19% (compared to the expected increase to 18%).</p><p>On March 19, the Central Bank of Russia announced a rate hike rate of 25 basis points to 4.50% (expected to remain at 4.25%).</p><p>Moreover, indicators from emerging countries such as India, Argentina, Malaysia, Thailand, and South Korea all show that market expectations for rate hike are increasing, with rate hike expected to occur at least once this year and the first half of next year.</p><p>The main reason driving rate hike in emerging market countries is certainly rising inflation. From a general analysis, inflationary pressures still originate from the supply side. On the one hand, the downstream consumer goods production capacity of these emerging market countries is already weak, and the impact of the pandemic has widened the supply and demand gap, which is directly reflected in pushing up commodity prices. On the other hand, food and transportation consumption account for more than 40-50% of these countries and they rely on imports and exports. Therefore, the rapid rise in global petroleum product and food prices has further increased the imported inflationary pressure on emerging market countries.</p><p>Chart: Inflation level reaches target policy area</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e94ce07a7037fde2b973d9eb87b28c31\" tg-width=\"553\" tg-height=\"218\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>These emerging market countries, which are highly open and dependent on foreign trade, can only passively accept the spillover of the economies and policies of developed countries to a large extent. However, compared to rising inflation, the economic recovery of these emerging countries is still in a relatively slow process, especially Brazil and Türkiye, where unemployment rates are high at over 10%, and the control of the pandemic is once again facing challenges.</p><p>Chart: Economic recovery will take time</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2f81cda958ecf4d254726ed35cd77803\" tg-width=\"553\" tg-height=\"204\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>At the same time, in order to prevent a vicious circle expectations of an excessively rapid return of the US dollar, currency depreciation, hyperinflation, domestic rate hike, falling asset prices, and exposure of foreign debt, emerging market countries had to take the lead in launching rate hike, firstly to curb bubbles and secondly to stabilize capital outflows.</p><p>Chart: The largest appreciation of currencies relative to the US dollar last year</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f5087af222bd88b05f938b86843362cc\" tg-width=\"553\" tg-height=\"234\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Countries with high external debt ratios and significant asset market gains may pay a greater price. Turkey's overnight lending rate has remained above 15% this year, making it difficult to curb international capital outflows. The resignation of the central bank governor following better-than-expected rate hike has further triggered a vicious circle expectations, causing asset prices to plummet and the currency to collapse. In terms of external debt, Chile and South Africa are next.</p><p>High inflation, especially in countries with high asset price increases, indicates that more capital is flowing into the virtual economy than into the recovery of the real economy, and there is also a significant risk of capital outflow. For example, Argentina and India. In these countries, rate hike is more about choosing the lesser of two evils, and there is not much independence in monetary policy. If there is a rapid outflow of capital, they will pay the price for last year's liquidity feast.</p><p>In the United States, as funds flow back and arbitrage trading between the US and Europe increases demand for US Treasury bonds, the upward pressure on US Treasury yields will actually ease.</p><p>Chart: The interest rate differential between Europe and the United States widens to the mean level</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/17f074dd3e16aa39866470bd4c68767c\" tg-width=\"553\" tg-height=\"294\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>As the dollar rises and falls, China, as the largest emerging market country, will withstand some shocks thanks to its domestic supply capacity, liquidity restraint, and currency independence. However, under the global storm, asset price pressures are unlikely to ease.</p><p>Perhaps money can exceed printing, but wealth cannot. When we look at the current state of global money from a more macro perspective, a deeper question is how to make good use of our policy tools, and how individuals can identify good assets to ensure that our wages are more stably preserved. By understanding the historical responsibility of the RMB and its value in keeping a low profile, we may be able to prepare for the upcoming risks.</p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/f3lP37XC665lbZXQhGuNGA\">华尔街见闻</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/082208e3c37780dd55878056410ffa43","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/f3lP37XC665lbZXQhGuNGA","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/cc96873d3d23ee6ac10685520df9c100","article_id":"1130451341","content_text":"1997年以色列的一场大会上，有人问弗里德曼，能不能一句话概括出经济学的精义，这位著作等身的经济学大师脱口而出，天下没有免费的午餐，这就是我经济理论的全部。反观当前，过去几周，美国财政刺激和货币宽松的双重浪潮，把全球市场的注意力瞬间从通缩转向通胀，几乎在股债市场掀起血雨腥风。而上周伴随鲍威尔在采访中突然开始释放鹰派信号，这场饕餮盛宴怕是要进入下半场了。真正酒阑人散之前，有人必须要做好买单的准备。只是，单有多大，又由谁来买？随着美国慢慢开始抄底全球资产，美元已经启动回流，新兴市场为了抵御冲击，早已经率先掀起了加息潮。货币的汪洋流向全球之际，是时候品一品美国前财长康纳利的话：美元是我们的货币，却是你们的问题。本期我们就来盘一盘美国这场巨量刺激的来龙去脉。我们将着重探讨三件事:第一，美国推出史无前例的财政货币双刺激，为什么要下这么重的狠手？第二，超级刺激可能导致美国经济严重过热？第三，美国放水，全球买单，这场大放水又会以怎样的方式收场？01、美国这轮刺激有多猛财政刺激有多大？去年4月2.2万亿美元的财政刺激之后，特朗普政府年底又出台了一项9000亿美元的刺激；到了今年，拜登上来就通过了1.9万亿刺激法案，占到美国去年GDP的10%，转眼最新的2.25万亿基建又已官宣。不算还未正式出台的最后一项，短短一年时间，财政刺激总量已经达到了5万亿的天量，纵向对比，是08年金融危机之后两年奥巴马政府将近8000亿刺激的整整6倍；横向对比，这个数字占美国GDP的25%，这一比例远远超过德国（12%）和日本（16%）。而货币政策方面，这轮QE又有多大？2008年金融危机时，美联储耗时6年，用了三轮QE，一共也只购买了3万多亿美元资产，而这次QE只花了6个月，就轻轻松松达到了这一规模。如果08年的财货刺激是左手手里剑右手左轮手枪的话，这次就是两杆齐发的加农炮。但是为什么这次美国财政和货币政策两头都要狂风暴雨式地加足马力？先来看看财政。最新1.9万亿的通过非常戏剧化。这个数字首先是远远超过大家预期的，因为拜登提出这项计划的最初，共和党支持的刺激数字只有6000多亿，之间差了1.3万亿。而拜登之前又一直声称两党要团结合作，大家就认为他会做个折中，最后放水量应该也就在9000亿美元左右。但出人意料的是，拜登突然来了个“霸王硬上弓”式的操作，强行通过了一个叫作“预算调和程序”的方案。简单来说，它把参议院通过刺激法案原本所需要的票数大大降低，只需要过半数就能通过。于是未来就1.9万亿进行投票的时候，就算共和党一致反对，占参议院多数的民主党，也能强行甩开共和党，凭一己之力让法案得到推进。问题是，拜登为什么突然不顾共和党反对，急于让1.9万亿快速板上钉钉？因为2008年金融危机时，奥巴马的民主党就在财政刺激上吃过大亏。12年前，正是因为共和党反对，奥巴马政府的财政刺激方案大幅缩水，原本2万亿美元的刺激方案最终只通过了不到8000亿。但要知道，这点小钱远远无法令经济快速复苏，接下来两年美国经济增长缓慢，就业市场复苏陷入停滞，奥巴马的民众支持率直线下降，很快在2010年中选输掉了众院，被共和党重新夺回了控制权。可以说，上一轮危机中，正是由于奥巴马政府不够强硬，不仅导致民主党失势，还使得美国经济在泥潭中陷得更久。拜登作为奥巴马当时的副手，显然对这次教训刻骨铭心。所以自己上台后一不做二不休，来个硬碰硬，生怕重蹈当年覆辙。那么量化宽松呢？从上面的事实看来，09年的QE是在财政政策被共和党束缚住手脚的情况下，美国做出的“次优选择”。而如今既然已经有了天量刺激，为什么鲍威尔还要坚持迟迟不退出QE？我们认为，大致有以下三个原因：第一，鲍威尔始终不认为会有真正的严重通胀压力。像不久前他在美国众议院金融服务委员会听证会上所说，全球性通缩已持续20多年，现在短短一次通胀，怎么就会失控呢？第二，即便有通胀压力，由于美元的储备货币地位，通胀带来的后果并不需要美国独自承担。我们会在后面说到这一点。第三，比起通胀压力，美联储更担心的是通缩预期。所谓通缩，就是通货膨胀率降到零以下，整个社会处在一个物价持续、普遍下降的环境之中。一旦人们有了价格持续下跌的预期，就会把想买的东西留到未来更便宜的时候去买。比如你想买房，现在是5w一平米，但你预计过两年就变成4w一平米了，那在条件允许的情况下，一定是两年后买入更划得来。对企业购买原料、进行投资也是一样的逻辑。这样一来，消费和投资欲望就被大大降低，手里钱再多也无济于事。美国GDP超六成来自消费，需求不够，生产自然也上不去，经济只能停滞不前，整个过程有多可怕，看看日本“失去的20年”就知道。短期来看，QE对缓解通缩预期绝对是一剂猛药。它只需要做一件事，就是推高资产价格，尤其是股市和楼市价格，从而给人们营造一番手头富裕，经济也欣欣向荣的假象。即便并没有转化成真实的现金流，人们也可能开开心心地进行更多的消费，进而刺激生产和经济复苏。这完全是个心理学问题，在财政政策配合下尤其行得通。但是，切勿把牛市和实体经济走强混为一谈，QE是否是饮鸩止渴，未来会否对经济形成反噬？这是后话，我们会在下面讲到。02、美国经济可能过热刚才我们解释了，美国这次财政、货币刺激的规模史无前例。那么这样的巨额刺激下，美国经济会发生什么呢？答案就是通胀上升，经济过热，而且过热程度可能比市场预期要严重得多。因为长时间、大规模的QE，不知不觉给了通胀巨大的上行空间。为了了解长期QE的影响，下面，我们首先最简单地解释一下央行货币政策进行宏观调控的整个传导路径；再回到一个没有QE的“史前”世界里，看看正常情况下货币政策体系是怎么运转的；如今有了QE，运转模式又发生了怎样的变化。我们常说央行撒钱，但钱肯定不是直接撒在人民群众身上的，而是首先撒给商业银行等各个金融机构，构成基础货币。方法有很多种，包括调节再贴现率、调节存款准备金率，和QE最相关的买卖政府债券也是其中之一，央行买进债券的同时付出去一笔钱，实质就是向金融系统注入一笔基础货币。紧接着，各个银行要么把这些钱投入实体经济，也就是通过贷款的方式借给企业和家庭，让他们进行生产和消费，促进经济增长；要么，如果大多数企业和家庭都不愿意借钱，剩下的钱就会以储蓄的形式滞留在银行体系内部，或是流入股市等金融市场，则一方面实体经济发展缺少资金驱动，另一方面金融市场又可能积累过量资金引发泡沫。在QE前的世界，货币政策在上面一条道路上走得非常顺畅，即美联储通过常规货币政策提供的流动性，能很好地传到企业和居民手里。经济衰退时，一边积极的财政政策稳住企业和居民的信心，一边央行降低政策利率，同时给银行业提供流动性；商业银行一有钱，居民和企业也被低利率和财政刺激鼓舞着，积极借钱买房和投资。一旦经济开始复苏，央行所要做的就是逐步提高政策利率，抑制信贷，从而防止通胀。于是从图上可以看出，基础货币、货币供应、银行信贷三条线教科书一般地同起同落，在此过程中，长期利率也随政策利率下降和回升。2008年前的美欧，1990年前的日本就是处于这种状态。但是QE打破了这一局面。刚才我们介绍过，08年房地产泡沫破裂后，由于财政刺激不给力，美国不得不一条腿走路，用货币政策QE释放大量的流动性，试图刺激内需，却在受到重创的家庭和企业面前收效甚微。抵押物价格暴跌之后，人们不仅不愿意借钱，反而还有大量债务等着还。于是，一边是随着QE扩大、利率下降到0，美国流动性来到前所未有的水平，基础货币占GDP比重从08年的6%上升到25%；另一边，人们握着巨额储蓄却不花出去，资金不仅没有以贷款形式离开银行业，还以储蓄和还贷形式回去了（第一张图），使得经济和通胀迟迟上不来（第二张图）。也就是说，如果整个货币体系仍然按照08年以前的模式运行，现在美国的通胀应该已经上升到很高的水平了。如果把央行撒的钱比作水，现在的价格就像是裹了一层胶质、难以进水的海绵，一旦胶质被剥离掉，海绵就会迅速吸水进而膨胀。于是我们可以看到一旦需求改善，人们开始恢复借款会发生什么：银行信贷和货币供应量都可能比现在高出好几倍，物价也可能随之大幅度攀升，那将意味着非常高的通胀。在这种预期之下，一旦经济出现复苏迹象，对通胀压力的高度紧张，就将加剧市场对流动性波动的恐慌。投资者担心，央行到时候将不得不减少债券购买乃至卖出长期债券，于是也纷纷抛售债券来规避风险，从而，QE国家长期利率也会比没有QE时以更快的速度上行，进一步对实体经济和股市、商品市场造成严重波动。QE持续时间越长，这些问题无疑也会越严重。野村证券首席研究员辜朝明曾在2013年美联储第三轮QE期间，提出了一个“量化宽松陷阱”（QE Trap）模型，讨论了长时间QE对经济的损伤程度：最初，QE国长期利率降幅要比非QE国大得多，意味着随后经济复苏更快(t1)。但随着经济的回暖，货币政策收紧，长期利率迅速攀升，部分利率敏感行业又面临需求下降，迫使央行重新放松政策立场。经济再次复苏后，随着市场又重新关注央行吸收超额准备金的可能性，长期利率在一个所谓“QE Trap”的重复周期中上行。相比之下，非QE国长期利率下降是渐进的，这延迟了复苏的开始(t2)；但一旦经济开始好转，由于利率较低，复苏步伐实际会更快。从美国疫情前逐步货币政策正常化的7年经验当中，我们也可以推出这一结论。美国上一轮QE是在2013年逐步退出的，但如果不退会发生什么？经济会更好吗？也许不会。当年美联储刚开始缩减购债的时候，通胀率只有1%，之后虽然9次加息、2017年10月又开始了量化紧缩（QT），通胀率却仍然在慢慢上升。深压住通胀的和让通胀维持缓慢上行的是同一个原因，那就是家庭和企业手里的储蓄始终没有得到消化，没有借钱，利率升高也就对他们造不成压力。这反过来说明，即便当时利率继续保持低位，经济活动也可能无动于衷。不仅如此，由于实体经济需求不足，继续QE反而可能导致大量闲钱进入房地产和金融市场，激起厚厚的资产泡沫。事实上，美国商业地产价格目前已经比2007年的上一个峰值高出了50%。重要的是，鉴于本轮QE比金融危机时已经迅猛得多，辜朝明在最近发布的研报中认为，美国经济已经半只脚踏进“量化宽松陷阱”中了，私营部门一旦恢复借款，通胀飙高、长债利率飙升乃是一触即发，届时将需要大幅提高政策利率来压制通胀。在70年代末那个没有QE的史前世界，美联储把政策利率大幅提高到22%来抑制通胀，如今又需要怎样的水平呢？03、美国放水，全球买单，这场大放水又会以怎样的方式收场？刚才我们谈了超级大放水对美国经济的影响。由于美元霸权的存在，美国经济政策的影响力绝不限于美国国内，通过一系列传导机制，美国这轮经济刺激影响极为深远，很有可能让全球都为美国人买单。而其中付出最大代价的可能还是新兴市场，这在历来都是如此，可能也是美国肆无忌惮大放水的原因之一。2020年，随着作为全球储备货币的美元流通量激增，各国纷纷开启了放水之路，以抵抗美国超发货币所引发的通胀，美国借此将通胀输出到全球。这在各国的房价涨幅上就有直接体现，OECD数据显示，去年全球89%国家的房价都在上涨，这一比例为2000年以来最高，土耳其、俄罗斯尤其上涨超过20%。而如今随着美国通胀预期的增强，美债收益率大幅走高，以及美国与新兴市场国家复苏节奏的错位，美元开始阶段性走强，并呈现出回流态势，局面完全反转。新兴市场被迫再次响应那句老话：美国人印钞票，全世界来买单。3月以来，新兴市场国家集体“抢跑”，赶在美联储行动之前提前加息。美国3月的议息会议前后的短短一周中，多个新兴市场国家纷纷掀起加息潮：3月17日巴西央行宣布上调基准贷款利率75个基点至2.75%（预期50个基点）。3月18日土耳其央行宣布将关键利率上调200个基点至19%（预期上调至18%）。3月19日俄罗斯央行宣布加息25个基点至4.50%（预期维持4.25%）。不仅如此，印度、阿根廷、马来西亚、泰国、韩国等新兴国家的指标均显示，市场对于加息的预期正在增强，今年至明年上半年至少加息一次。推动新兴市场国家加息的主要原因肯定是通胀的上行。而通胀的压力从普遍的分析来看还是自于供给端。一方面这类新兴市场国家下游消费品端的生产能力本身就薄弱，疫情的冲击便使得供需缺口扩大，直接体现到推升商品价格上。另一方面，这些国家的食品与交通类消费占比都在40-50%之上，且依赖于进出口，因而全球石油制品和食品价格的快速上行便进一步增加了新兴市场国家的输入性通胀压力。图：通胀水平达到目标政策区域这些具有高开放性和外贸依赖的新兴市场国家，很大程度上，只能被动接受发达国家经济和政策的溢出。然而，相对于通胀的上行，这些新兴国家的经济修复还处于一个相对偏慢的过程中，尤其是巴西和土耳其，失业率高企10%以上，同时对疫情的控制也再度面临考验。图：经济修复尚需时日与此同时，为了防止出现美元过快回流—本币贬值—恶性通胀—本国加息—资产价格下跌—外债暴露的恶性循环预期，新兴市场国家也不得不率先启动加息，一来抑制泡沫，二来稳定资本流出。图：去年各国货币相对美元最大升值幅度而那些外债比例高和资产市场涨幅明显的国家，或会付出更大的代价。今年以来土耳其隔夜拆借利率高企于15%以上，依然难以抑制国际资本流出，超预期加息后央行行长下台更引发恶性循环预期，资产价格暴跌，汇率崩盘。从外债来看接下来是智利、南非等。通胀偏高，尤其是资产价格涨幅偏高的国家，显示资本更多进入虚拟经济体而非实体经济复苏，也存在较大的资本流出风险。比如阿根廷、印度。这些国家加息更多是两害权其轻的操作，也没有太多货币政策的独立性可言。一旦出现资本流出较快，他们将为去年的流动性盛宴付出代价。美国呢，随着资金回流，美欧套利交易增加美债需求，美债利率上行压力反倒会有所缓解。图：欧美利差水平走阔至均值水平美元潮起潮落，中国作为最大的新兴市场国家，得益于国内的供给能力、流动性克制和货币独立，将抵御部分冲击，但是在全球性的风暴之下，资产价格压力难言缓和。或许货币可以超印，但财富不能，当我们以一个更宏观的视角看待全球货币现状，一个更深刻的命题是，如何用好自己的政策工具，作为个人又如何甄别好的资产，让自己的劳动报酬获得更稳健的保值。理解手中人民币的历史责任和其韬光养晦的价值，我们或许能在即将到来的风险中有所准备。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2229,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":376119967,"gmtCreate":1619097012059,"gmtModify":1704719577516,"author":{"id":"3536928846214760","authorId":"3536928846214760","name":"東海吉龍","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0ef8466588cf515f97a20c636e2be8a0","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3536928846214760","authorIdStr":"3536928846214760"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"666","listText":"666","text":"666","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/376119967","repostId":"1129282939","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1129282939","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"为用户提供金融资讯、行情、数据，旨在帮助投资者理解世界，做投资决策。","home_visible":1,"media_name":"老虎资讯综合","id":"102","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1619094484,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1129282939?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-22 20:28","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Pre-market: Uxin's stock price surged due to its partnership with JD.com, while TAL Education Group's strong earnings report caused a stir.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1129282939","media":"老虎资讯综合","summary":"4月22日，美国三大股指下跌，截至发稿，道指期货跌0.05%；标普500指数期货跌0.11%；纳斯达克100指数期货跌0.25%。美国上周首次申领失业救济人数为万54.7人，预估为61万人，前值为57","content":"<p>On April 22, the three major U.S. stock indexes fell, with Dow Jones futures down 0.05% as of press time. S&P 500 futures fell 0.11%; Nasdaq 100 futures fell 0.25%. The number of initial jobless claims in the United States last week was 54.7 million, compared to an estimated 610,000 and the previous figure of 576,000.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a948444803dea28ccf37e01d20bba3c9\" tg-width=\"828\" tg-height=\"248\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><b>Today's big event: the World Leaders Climate Summit</b></p><p>At 8 PM Beijing time on the 22nd, the US-hosted Leaders' Climate Summit will be held via video link. According to information published on the White House website, the United States has extended invitations to leaders of 40 countries. The U.S. State Department announced the specific schedule for the climate summit on its website on the 22nd.</p><p>The two-day summit included five agenda items, covering topics such as enhancing resolve to address climate change, climate adaptability and resilience, climate security, innovative technologies for addressing climate change, and economic opportunities brought about by climate change.</p><p><b>Pre-market price</b></p><p>U.S. hydrogen energy stocks rose in pre-market trading.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FCEL\">fuel cell energy</a>It rose more than 4%.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PLUG\">Plug Energy</a>It rose more than 3%, while Bloom Energy rose 1.5%.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CS\">Credit Suisse</a>U.S. stocks fell more than 5% in pre-market trading, after...<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CS\">Credit Suisse</a>Credit Suisse reported a net loss of 252 million Swiss francs in the first quarter and expects the Archegos incident to generate approximately 600 million Swiss francs in the second quarter.<b>(Approximately US$654 million)</b>The impact. In addition, Credit Suisse plans to cut by the end of the year.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IBOC\">International bank</a>The business has a risk exposure of at least $35 billion.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UXIN\">Uxin</a>Used car stocks surged more than 14% in pre-market trading, following the announcement of a partnership with...<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JD\">JD.com</a>Establish strategic partnerships.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CAN\">Canaan Technology</a>The stock rose more than 7% in pre-market trading after announcing plans to supply 11,760 Bitcoin mining machines to Mawson.</p><p>AT&T shares rose more than 4% in pre-market trading to $31.41. AT&T reportedly released its first-quarter 2021 results, showing revenue of $43.939 billion, a 2.7% increase compared to $42.779 billion in the same period last year. Net profit was $7.942 billion, compared with $4.963 billion in the same period last year.</p><p>Nikola rose more than 3% in pre-market trading after announcing a partnership with...<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TA\">Travel Centers of America</a>A hydrogen fuel agreement was signed.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TAL\">TAL Education Group</a>The stock rose more than 6% in pre-market trading after a financial report showed that Q4 net revenue was $1.363 billion, a year-over-year increase of 58.9%. Net revenue for the full year of fiscal year 2021 was $4.496 billion, a year-over-year increase of 37.3%.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/300024\">Robot</a>Software company UiPath rose more than 4% in pre-market trading and closed up 23.2% yesterday.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAL\">American Airlines</a>The stock rose more than 3% in pre-market trading. Q1 2021 revenue was $4.008 billion, compared to market expectations of $4.05 billion and $8.515 billion in the same period last year. Q1 net profit was -$1.25 billion, compared to market expectations of -$1.762 billion and -$2.241 billion in the same period last year.</p><p>Evolus shares fell more than 18% in pre-market trading as it plans to issue common shares publicly.</p><p>Software company Tianrui (TDC.O) rose more than 28% in pre-market trading after executives said they expect quarterly revenue to exceed previous expectations.</p><p>Fisker fell more than 9% in pre-market trading after the stock was previously...<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GS\">Goldman Sachs</a>We downgraded our rating to Sell.</p><p><b>European Market</b></p><p>Major European stock indices rose across the board; as of press time, Germany's DAX30 index was up 0.66%.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VUKE.UK\">UK FTSE 100</a>It rose 0.18%, and the French CAC40 rose 0.68%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/85454e772ec1d010a5be19c31a63b732\" tg-width=\"819\" tg-height=\"355\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><b>crude oil</b></p><p>Both US and Brent crude oil prices fluctuated and fell. As of press time, WTI crude oil was down 0.15% at $61.27 per barrel. Brent crude oil fell 0.24% to $65.16 a barrel.</p><p>An unexpected increase in U.S. crude oil inventories and a renewed surge in COVID-19 cases in India and Japan have raised concerns about the global economic recovery and a potential stagnation in fuel demand. OPEC+ sources say next week's meeting of oil-producing countries will be primarily technical and unlikely to make significant changes to policy.</p><p><b>gold</b></p><p>Spot gold prices rose, falling 0.53% to $1783.651784.05 per ounce as of press time.</p><p>The continued high run of the stock market limited the rise in gold prices, and the accelerated pace of vaccination in the United States also boosted expectations of economic recovery, which will also drag down gold to some extent.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Pre-market: Uxin's stock price surged due to its partnership with JD.com, while TAL Education Group's strong earnings report caused a stir.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPre-market: Uxin's stock price surged due to its partnership with JD.com, while TAL Education Group's strong earnings report caused a stir.\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/102\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">老虎资讯综合 </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-04-22 20:28</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>On April 22, the three major U.S. stock indexes fell, with Dow Jones futures down 0.05% as of press time. S&P 500 futures fell 0.11%; Nasdaq 100 futures fell 0.25%. The number of initial jobless claims in the United States last week was 54.7 million, compared to an estimated 610,000 and the previous figure of 576,000.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a948444803dea28ccf37e01d20bba3c9\" tg-width=\"828\" tg-height=\"248\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><b>Today's big event: the World Leaders Climate Summit</b></p><p>At 8 PM Beijing time on the 22nd, the US-hosted Leaders' Climate Summit will be held via video link. According to information published on the White House website, the United States has extended invitations to leaders of 40 countries. The U.S. State Department announced the specific schedule for the climate summit on its website on the 22nd.</p><p>The two-day summit included five agenda items, covering topics such as enhancing resolve to address climate change, climate adaptability and resilience, climate security, innovative technologies for addressing climate change, and economic opportunities brought about by climate change.</p><p><b>Pre-market price</b></p><p>U.S. hydrogen energy stocks rose in pre-market trading.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FCEL\">fuel cell energy</a>It rose more than 4%.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PLUG\">Plug Energy</a>It rose more than 3%, while Bloom Energy rose 1.5%.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CS\">Credit Suisse</a>U.S. stocks fell more than 5% in pre-market trading, after...<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CS\">Credit Suisse</a>Credit Suisse reported a net loss of 252 million Swiss francs in the first quarter and expects the Archegos incident to generate approximately 600 million Swiss francs in the second quarter.<b>(Approximately US$654 million)</b>The impact. In addition, Credit Suisse plans to cut by the end of the year.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IBOC\">International bank</a>The business has a risk exposure of at least $35 billion.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UXIN\">Uxin</a>Used car stocks surged more than 14% in pre-market trading, following the announcement of a partnership with...<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JD\">JD.com</a>Establish strategic partnerships.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CAN\">Canaan Technology</a>The stock rose more than 7% in pre-market trading after announcing plans to supply 11,760 Bitcoin mining machines to Mawson.</p><p>AT&T shares rose more than 4% in pre-market trading to $31.41. AT&T reportedly released its first-quarter 2021 results, showing revenue of $43.939 billion, a 2.7% increase compared to $42.779 billion in the same period last year. Net profit was $7.942 billion, compared with $4.963 billion in the same period last year.</p><p>Nikola rose more than 3% in pre-market trading after announcing a partnership with...<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TA\">Travel Centers of America</a>A hydrogen fuel agreement was signed.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TAL\">TAL Education Group</a>The stock rose more than 6% in pre-market trading after a financial report showed that Q4 net revenue was $1.363 billion, a year-over-year increase of 58.9%. Net revenue for the full year of fiscal year 2021 was $4.496 billion, a year-over-year increase of 37.3%.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/300024\">Robot</a>Software company UiPath rose more than 4% in pre-market trading and closed up 23.2% yesterday.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAL\">American Airlines</a>The stock rose more than 3% in pre-market trading. Q1 2021 revenue was $4.008 billion, compared to market expectations of $4.05 billion and $8.515 billion in the same period last year. Q1 net profit was -$1.25 billion, compared to market expectations of -$1.762 billion and -$2.241 billion in the same period last year.</p><p>Evolus shares fell more than 18% in pre-market trading as it plans to issue common shares publicly.</p><p>Software company Tianrui (TDC.O) rose more than 28% in pre-market trading after executives said they expect quarterly revenue to exceed previous expectations.</p><p>Fisker fell more than 9% in pre-market trading after the stock was previously...<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GS\">Goldman Sachs</a>We downgraded our rating to Sell.</p><p><b>European Market</b></p><p>Major European stock indices rose across the board; as of press time, Germany's DAX30 index was up 0.66%.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VUKE.UK\">UK FTSE 100</a>It rose 0.18%, and the French CAC40 rose 0.68%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/85454e772ec1d010a5be19c31a63b732\" tg-width=\"819\" tg-height=\"355\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><b>crude oil</b></p><p>Both US and Brent crude oil prices fluctuated and fell. As of press time, WTI crude oil was down 0.15% at $61.27 per barrel. Brent crude oil fell 0.24% to $65.16 a barrel.</p><p>An unexpected increase in U.S. crude oil inventories and a renewed surge in COVID-19 cases in India and Japan have raised concerns about the global economic recovery and a potential stagnation in fuel demand. OPEC+ sources say next week's meeting of oil-producing countries will be primarily technical and unlikely to make significant changes to policy.</p><p><b>gold</b></p><p>Spot gold prices rose, falling 0.53% to $1783.651784.05 per ounce as of press time.</p><p>The continued high run of the stock market limited the rise in gold prices, and the accelerated pace of vaccination in the United States also boosted expectations of economic recovery, which will also drag down gold to some extent.</p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ed4ee39e6b0f45214393093d70ba81a8","relate_stocks":{"159945":"能源","TAL":"好未来",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯","PLUG":"普拉格能源",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1129282939","content_text":"4月22日，美国三大股指下跌，截至发稿，道指期货跌0.05%；标普500指数期货跌0.11%；纳斯达克100指数期货跌0.25%。美国上周首次申领失业救济人数为万54.7人，预估为61万人，前值为57.6万人。今天大事件，世界领导人气候峰会北京时间22日20时，美国主办的领导人气候峰会将以视频形式举行。据白宫网站公布的信息显示，美国向40个国家的领导人发出了邀请。美国国务院官网于22日公布了此次气候峰会的具体日程安排。此次峰会会期两天，包含5项议程，讨论的主题涉及提高应对气候变化的决心、气候适应能力与韧性、气候安全、应对气候变化的创新技术、应对气候变化带来的经济机会等。盘前行情美股氢能源板块盘前走高，燃料电池能源涨超4%，普拉格能源涨超3%，Bloom Energy涨1.5%。瑞士信贷美股盘前跌超5%，此前瑞士信贷公布财报，第一季净亏损2.52亿瑞郎 ，并预计Archegos事件还将在第二季度对瑞信产生约6亿瑞郎（约合6.54亿美元）的影响。另外，瑞信计划在年底前削减国际银行业务至少350亿美元的风险敞口。优信二手车盘前拉升涨超14%，此前宣布与京东建立战略合作关系。嘉楠科技盘前涨超7%，将向Mawson提供11760台比特币挖矿机。AT&T盘前股价涨超4%，报31.41美元。据悉，AT&T公布了2021年第一季度业绩，数据显示，该公司Q1营收439.39亿美元，较上年同期427.79亿美元增长2.7%;净利润79.42亿美元，上年同期为49.63亿美元。Nikola盘前涨超3%，此前宣布与TravelCenters of America签订氢燃料协议。好未来盘前涨超6%，财报显示：Q4净营收13.63亿美元，同比增长58.9%；2021财年全年净营收44.96亿美元，同比增长37.3%。机器人软件公司UiPath盘前涨超4%，昨日首挂收涨23.2%。美国航空盘前涨超3%，2021年Q1营收40.08亿美元，市场预期40.5亿美元，去年同期85.15亿美元。Q1净利润-12.5亿美元，市场预期-17.62亿美元，去年同期-22.41亿美元。Evolus盘前跌超18%，计划公开发行普通股。软件公司天睿(TDC.O)盘前涨超28%，公司高管表示预计本季度营收将超出此前预期。Fisker盘前跌超9%，此前该股被高盛下调评级至卖出。欧洲市场欧洲主要股指集体上涨，截至发稿，德国DAX30指数涨0.66%，英国富时100涨0.18%、法国CAC40涨0.68%。原油美、布两油震荡下跌，截止发稿，WTI原油跌0.15%，报61.27美元/桶；布伦特原油跌0.24%，报65.16美元/桶。因美国原油库存意外增加，且印度和日本新冠病例再次激增，引发对全球经济复苏及燃料需求可能停滞的担忧。OPEC+消息人士称，下周将要召开的产油国会议主要是技术性的，不太可能对政策做出重大改变。黄金现货黄金上跌，截止发稿，跌0.53%，报1783.651784.05美元/盎司。股市继续高位运行限制了金价的涨势，美国疫苗接种速度加快也提振了经济复苏的预期，对黄金也会产生一定的拖累。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"159945":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,"PLUG":0.9,".SPX":0.9,"TAL":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1803,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":376137181,"gmtCreate":1619096969843,"gmtModify":1704719574594,"author":{"id":"3536928846214760","authorId":"3536928846214760","name":"東海吉龍","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0ef8466588cf515f97a20c636e2be8a0","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3536928846214760","authorIdStr":"3536928846214760"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"666","listText":"666","text":"666","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/376137181","repostId":"1155546663","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1155546663","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1619095566,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1155546663?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-22 20:46","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Just now, Tesla provided driving data! Reversing the truth?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1155546663","media":"中国证券报  ","summary":"特斯拉方面确认，已经将相关行车数据提供给了消费者。\n4月22日，特斯拉相关负责人向中国证券报记者表示，特斯拉方面已经把事发前半小时的车辆原始数据邮件发给张女士及家人。由于张女士目前还处在行拘状态，电话","content":"<p><div>Tesla confirmed that it has provided relevant driving data to consumers. On April 22nd, the relevant person in charge of Tesla told china securities journal that Tesla had sent the original vehicle data email half an hour before the incident to Ms. Zhang and her family. As Ms. Zhang is still in detention, the phone has not been answered, and the company sent the data to the customer by email. At the same time, China Market Supervision News, which is in charge of the State Administration for Market Regulation, published the data of one minute before the vehicle accident, and made a written explanation. The full text of this note reads as follows: When the driver presses the brake pedal for the last time...</p><p><a href=\"https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/W4yHqJTPEOinQf-KwSaXGw\">Web link</a></div></p>","source":"zgzqb","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Just now, Tesla provided driving data! Reversing the truth?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nJust now, Tesla provided driving data! Reversing the truth?\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">中国证券报  </strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-04-22 20:46</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><div>Tesla confirmed that it has provided relevant driving data to consumers. On April 22nd, the relevant person in charge of Tesla told china securities journal that Tesla had sent the original vehicle data email half an hour before the incident to Ms. Zhang and her family. As Ms. Zhang is still in detention, the phone has not been answered, and the company sent the data to the customer by email. At the same time, China Market Supervision News, which is in charge of the State Administration for Market Regulation, published the data of one minute before the vehicle accident, and made a written explanation. The full text of this note reads as follows: When the driver presses the brake pedal for the last time...</p><p><a href=\"https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/W4yHqJTPEOinQf-KwSaXGw\">Web link</a></div></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/W4yHqJTPEOinQf-KwSaXGw\">中国证券报  </a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8350896f4f33c86bc28f200b67ab82b4","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/W4yHqJTPEOinQf-KwSaXGw","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1155546663","content_text":"特斯拉方面确认，已经将相关行车数据提供给了消费者。\n4月22日，特斯拉相关负责人向中国证券报记者表示，特斯拉方面已经把事发前半小时的车辆原始数据邮件发给张女士及家人。由于张女士目前还处在行拘状态，电话一直没有接，公司通过邮箱将数据发给了客户。\n同时，国家市场监督管理总局主管的中国市场监管报公开了车辆发生事故前一分钟的数据，并作出一份文字说明。\n这份文字说明全文如下：\n在驾驶员最后一次踩下制动踏板时，数据显示，车辆时速为118.5千米每小时。在驾驶员踩下制动踏板后的2.7秒内，最大制动主缸压力仅为45.9bar，之后驾驶员加大踩下制动踏板的幅度，制动主缸压力达到了92.7bar，紧接着前撞预警及自动紧急制动功能启动（最大制动主缸压力达到了140.7bar）并发挥了作用，减轻了碰撞的幅度，ABS作用之后的1.8秒，系统记录了碰撞的发生。驾驶员踩下制动踏板后，车速持续降低，发生碰撞前，车速降低至48.5千米每小时。\n来源：中国市场监管报\n综上所述，车辆以较高速度行驶，驾驶员开始踩下制动踏板力度较轻，之后，自动紧急制动功能启动并发挥了作用，提升了制动力并减轻了碰撞的冲击力，制动系统均正常介入工作并降低了车速。\n另外，关于事故发生前30分钟车辆的状况，特斯拉方面是这样叙述的：在车辆发生事故前的30分钟内，驾驶员正常驾驶车辆，有超过40次踩下制动踏板的记录。同时车辆有多次超过100千米每小时和多次刹停的情况发生。\n特斯拉相关负责人表示，将毫无保留地配合监管部门开展深入调查，开诚布公接受社会监督。\n特斯拉称愿意全力配合\n4月19日，上海车展首日，一女子站在一辆特斯拉Model3车顶高呼“特斯拉刹车失灵”。随后，该女子被保安抬走。\n4月21日晚间，国家市场监管总局网站发布消息称，已责成河南省、上海市等地市场监督管理部门依法维护消费者合法权益。\n同日，郑东新区市场监管局责令特斯拉汽车销售服务（郑州）有限公司无条件向张女士提供该车发生事故前半小时完整行车数据。\n特斯拉发声表示，愿意全力配合，提供事发前半小时的车辆原始数据给第三方鉴定机构或政府指定的技术监督部门或者消费者。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1810,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":347107491,"gmtCreate":1618472351713,"gmtModify":1704711346866,"author":{"id":"3536928846214760","authorId":"3536928846214760","name":"東海吉龍","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0ef8466588cf515f97a20c636e2be8a0","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3536928846214760","authorIdStr":"3536928846214760"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"123","listText":"123","text":"123","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/347107491","repostId":"2127003956","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2127003956","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1618468860,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2127003956?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-15 14:41","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Tesla's frequent brake failures may trigger a sales crisis","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2127003956","media":"财经网","summary":"4月11日，上海一停车场又现特斯拉刹车失灵事件。从已被媒体公开曝光的消息来看，自2020年至今，特斯拉汽车刹车失灵事件发生十起有余。在网络搜索引擎上，敲入“特斯拉刹车失灵”字样，显示结果多达567万条，以及近期发生的数起相关事故。2020年6月，江西南昌一辆特斯拉Model X因刹车失灵发生撞击事故后起火。据了解，对于刹车失灵引发的事故原因，特斯拉官方尚未给出过正面而详实的公开回应。","content":"<p><div>On April 11th, Tesla's brake failure occurred in a parking lot in Shanghai. According to public information, Mr. Liu, the owner of the incident, said that the car couldn't stop when it turned in the garage until it hit the wall and was forced to stop. Tesla responded that the ABS started and slid because the ground friction was too low, and the accident is still under further investigation. Judging from the news that has been publicly exposed by the media, since 2020, there have been more than ten incidents of brake failure in Tesla cars. For more than a year, such incidents have occurred frequently in Jiangxi, Shanghai, Zhejiang, Sichuan, Beijing, Jiangsu, Shenzhen and other places nationwide. And Tesla's official response to such...</p><p><a href=\"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN20210415144139787bc447&s=b\">Web link</a></div></p>","source":"tencent","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla's frequent brake failures may trigger a sales crisis</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla's frequent brake failures may trigger a sales crisis\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">财经网</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-04-15 14:41</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><div>On April 11th, Tesla's brake failure occurred in a parking lot in Shanghai. According to public information, Mr. Liu, the owner of the incident, said that the car couldn't stop when it turned in the garage until it hit the wall and was forced to stop. Tesla responded that the ABS started and slid because the ground friction was too low, and the accident is still under further investigation. Judging from the news that has been publicly exposed by the media, since 2020, there have been more than ten incidents of brake failure in Tesla cars. For more than a year, such incidents have occurred frequently in Jiangxi, Shanghai, Zhejiang, Sichuan, Beijing, Jiangsu, Shenzhen and other places nationwide. And Tesla's official response to such...</p><p><a href=\"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN20210415144139787bc447&s=b\">Web link</a></div></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN20210415144139787bc447&s=b\">财经网</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b4edcd70007a48ee832e76f61e110854","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN20210415144139787bc447&s=b","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/9a95c1376e76363c1401fee7d3717173","article_id":"2127003956","content_text":"4月11日，上海一停车场又现特斯拉刹车失灵事件。\n公开资料显示，事发车主刘先生称车子是在车库拐弯时刹不住，直至撞到墙面后逼停。\n特斯拉回应称：因地面摩擦力太低导致ABS启动有滑行，目前事故仍在进一步调查处理中。\n从已被媒体公开曝光的消息来看，自2020年至今，特斯拉汽车刹车失灵事件发生十起有余。一年多时间里，此类事件在全国范围内江西、上海、浙江、四川、北京、江苏、深圳等多地频发。而特斯拉官方对此类事故原因，多数并未给出内容详实的确切回应。\n\n在业内人士看来，短时间内相对高密度的刹车失灵事故“扎堆”，着实挑战着消费者对特斯拉汽车安全品质的信任感，特斯拉的品控危机或将对其在扩张抢占市场中的销量表现带来严重的负面影响。\n多次上演的刹车失灵\n财经网汽车注意到，本次发生在上海的特斯拉“刹车失灵”直接撞墙事件，已经在多个地方发生。\n在网络搜索引擎上，敲入“特斯拉刹车失灵”字样，显示结果多达567万条，以及近期发生的数起相关事故。\n2020年6月，江西南昌一辆特斯拉Model X因刹车失灵发生撞击事故后起火。车主称，事故发生前车辆突然提速到127km/h，发生撞击前他已在刹车失灵的情况下，先后躲避了四五十台车，勉强行驶了8公里。\n同年9月，在四川南充，51岁的刘女士驾驶的特斯拉疑似失控，造成多车连撞，2死6伤及多车受损。12月，深圳一辆正常行驶的特斯拉突然加速追尾一辆出租车，并再次加速撞上一辆货车后被阻停。车主称，刹车失灵的同时方向盘也无法操控。\n另有公开信息显示，今年3月11日，特斯拉model 3在海南也出现了刹车失灵并撞车的状况。值得玩味的是，官方工作人员复现时，在30KM的时速下亦出现刹车失灵引发撞车。对此特斯拉的回复是：地面湿滑，制动踏板踩得轻。ABS功能失效。\n据了解，对于刹车失灵引发的事故原因，特斯拉官方尚未给出过正面而详实的公开回应。\n事故频发或与自动驾驶辅助功能有关\n财经网汽车注意到，梳理特斯拉刹车失灵的事故案例，出现了有关Autopilot自动驾驶功能是否开启的讨论。\n据了解，目前特斯拉旗下的Model X、Model S、Model 3都可以实现Autopoilot功能。在特斯拉CEO埃隆·马斯克的描述中，该系统功能被视为核心竞争优势，或可理解为精髓承载。\n该系统最早可追溯到2013年，其由马斯克由航空领域借用了航空领域Autopoilot自动导航名称，将此理念立为招牌。2016年，马斯克接受采访时称要打造“全自动驾驶”。四年后，特斯拉FSD被推出。\n美国汽车工程师协会（SAE）将汽车驾驶的自动化级别，按车辆功能及控制权/责任归属，自L0-l5做了明确细分：L0为无自动化、L1辅助驾驶、L2部分自动驾驶、L3有条件自动驾驶、L4高度自动驾驶、L5完全自动驾驶。\n在特斯拉的中文手册中，Atuopoilot曾被解释为“自动驾驶”，后因事故频发其改为“自动辅助驾驶功能”。而FSD则是Full Self-Driving的英文简写，即“完全自动驾驶”。\n据相关业公开资料显示，目前为止无论是Autopoilot还是FSD，均未达L3级别标准。L3是自动驾驶的起点标准，而L1/2通常被概称为驾驶辅助。\n由此，特斯拉曾被一些第三方机构质疑过度宣传。\n据不完全统计，涉及特斯拉的伤亡事故中，驾驶员过度信赖其自动辅助驾驶功能的原因占有一定比重。\n有行业人士指出，国内所有特斯拉车型配备的自动辅助驾驶功能目前仍不可脱离驾驶员的实时监控。\n质量问题或将引发销量危机\n另一方面，特斯拉的自动驾驶辅助功能，也被一些独立机构认为技术水准并不出众。\n财经网汽车了解到，美国Navigant Research公司对自动驾驶领域企业实力进行了排名。\n该公司参考了各企业市场发展策略、产品质量与可靠性、技术、产能、产品策略等十个维度的考量依据，在横竖坐标分别为策略能力、执行能力的坐标系中划分排名，并将参与企业划分为领导者、竞争者、挑战者及跟随者四个档次。结果显示，谷歌Waymo是其中的佼佼者，而与强势宣传效果不同的是，特斯拉在这份排名中的表现并不出众。\n2020年特斯拉完成50万辆的交付目标。特别是迈入2021年，特斯拉摆脱了以往因产能不足引发“订单压顶”的掣肘，尤其是以Model Y亮相为契机大打价格战，准备以最快速度抢占市场份额。\n而这一过程中，特斯拉被指对于相关细节品质，某种程度上并不重视。\n对此有专家表示，汽车市场已然发生变化，如若特斯拉继续为了大规模抢占市场而放纵品控底线，忽略消费者的愤怒，或将影响市场信赖度，长期销量目标也将难以为继。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1438,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":347107819,"gmtCreate":1618472263931,"gmtModify":1704711346221,"author":{"id":"3536928846214760","authorId":"3536928846214760","name":"東海吉龍","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0ef8466588cf515f97a20c636e2be8a0","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3536928846214760","authorIdStr":"3536928846214760"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"666","listText":"666","text":"666","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/347107819","repostId":"1111977847","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1111977847","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1618472047,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1111977847?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-15 15:34","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Disassembling TuSimple's Future: 6 Questions to Understand the World's First Autonomous Driving","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1111977847","media":"甲子光年","summary":"文/高雅\n就在今天晚上，“全球自动驾驶第一股”要来了。如果不出意外，美东时间4月15日，图森未来（以下简称“图森”）将在纳斯达克上市，股票代码TSP。\n与此前看客们的期待不同，“全球自动驾驶第一股”率","content":"<p>By Gao Ya</p><p>Tonight, the \"world's first autonomous driving stock\" is coming. Barring any unforeseen circumstances, TuSimple Future (hereinafter referred to as \"TuSimple\") will be listed on Nasdaq on April 15, Eastern Time, under the ticker symbol TSP.</p><p>Contrary to the expectations of onlookers, the \"world's first autonomous driving stock\" was the first to free up the hands of truck drivers. On March 23 this year, TuSimple, an autonomous truck company, submitted its IPO application; On the 7th of this month, it further determined the price range and number of shares to be issued.</p><p>In this IPO, TuSimple plans to issue 33.78 million ADS, including 27.02 million shares issued by the company and those issued by existing shareholders.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SINA\">Sina</a>6.75 million shares were sold. Tucson has set an offering price range of $35 to $39. According to previous disclosures, TuSimple hopes to raise $800 million to $1 billion. If the IPO is successful, TuSimple's overall valuation is approximately $5 to $7 billion.</p><p>Some analysts believe that Tucson is likely to sell an additional $1 billion in stock \"because investors have an appetite.\" Financing is currently booming in the autonomous driving sector. According to a previous exclusive report by \"Jiazi Guangnian\", autonomous driving company Xidi Intelligent Driving has completed two rounds of financing within three months, and the latest round of financing has far exceeded the plan. Xidi Intelligent Driving is just a microcosm of the entire industry. In the first two months of 2021 alone, there were 24 investment and financing events in the autonomous driving industry, with a total disclosed investment and financing amount of 17.64 billion yuan.</p><p>With TuSimple's IPO, Nasdaq will also welcome the world's first listed autonomous driving company. The close contact between autonomous driving and the stock market has begun. In the race to go public, TuSimple emerged victorious.</p><p>\"Sixty Years of Light\" broke down TuSimple's prospectus to see what kind of company it is:</p><p>The autonomous driving sector is booming, and now is a good time to enter the secondary market, with TuSimple successfully taking the lead.</p><p>TuSimple aims to seize the world's first listed company in autonomous driving to prepare for its subsequent business development. According to its plan, Tucson aims to expand its autonomous freight network (AFN) throughout the continental United States by 2024.</p><p>Regarding the use of funds raised from the IPO, TuSimple currently does not plan to invest in research and development or products.</p><p>Compared to the passenger car sector, the driverless truck market seems to be a blue ocean. However, the technology has only just begun to be implemented and commercialized, and the marathon has only just begun.</p><p>TuSimple is still losing money and currently has no profit plans;</p><p>TuSimple's largest outside shareholder is Sun Dream Inc., an affiliate of Sina. How did this long-established internet company invest in an autonomous driving company? Intriguing.</p><p><b>1. Who is Tucson?</b></p><p>Tucson is a brand of driverless trucks. Founded in September 2015, it aims to empower the global logistics and transportation industry through artificial intelligence.</p><p>The company claims its vision is to revolutionize the approximately $4 trillion global trucking market. According to a report by consulting firm Armstrong & Associates, the total freight market in the United States generates $100 million in annual revenue, with trucking accounting for another 80%. The United States is currently Tucson's main market.</p><p>To achieve this goal, TuSimple has developed technologies for semi-trucks, namely commercially viable Level 4 autonomous driving solutions based on computer vision, unmanned transportation solutions for container trucks in highway scenarios and ports. Combined with the Autonomous Freight Network (AFN), TuSimple believes that long-distance truck transportation will be safer, more reliable, more efficient and environmentally friendly.</p><p>Level 4 autonomous driving (High Automation) refers to a vehicle that can automatically plan its route and avoid traffic congestion under the control of a trip computer, without the owner having to intervene.</p><p>In 2020, TuSimple's revenue was $1.84 million; In 2018, this figure was $9,000. In fact, similar companies in autonomous driving have recently enjoyed good times. In addition to the gradual maturation of the technology and the general increase in acceptance, the pandemic has also reduced contact between people.</p><p>The current \"TuSimple Future Co., Ltd.\" was formerly known as \"Beijing TuSimple Internet Technology Co., Ltd.\" In 2017, the company changed its name to \"TuSimple Future\" and its business shifted from providing technical services to autonomous driving. At the time, founder Chen Mo had his eye on the hot topic of autonomous driving. Chen Mo touts himself as \"a pragmatist\" and will choose the path closest to money.</p><p>This is also Chen Mo's fifth entrepreneurial venture. Before founding TuSimple, Chen Mo participated in the operation of three companies: Cangqiong Advertising (a building advertising platform), DeepBlue Brothers (a web game and card game platform), and CheGuo.com (an automotive O2O trading platform). However, in addition to seizing opportunities, starting a business also requires a bit of luck. The first three startups failed halfway through, until TuSimple was founded.</p><p>TuSimple's technological background comes from another founding member and CTO, Hou Xiaodi, who holds a PhD in Computing and Neuroscience from Caltech. He created the theory of visual attention mechanisms based on the frequency domain and has been referred to by the media as the prototype of \"campus hackers\".</p><p><b>2. Why did you choose a truck?</b></p><p>Autonomous driving can be divided into the passenger sector and the commercial sector. The half-card selected by Tucson belongs to the commercial field of autonomous driving. Domestic analysts often regard TuSimple, SmartPlus, and Pony.ai as the \"three new treasures\" of the unmanned freight market.</p><p>The market space for passenger vehicles is far larger than that for commercial vehicles. Chen Mo once told the media that their (passenger vehicle) market is nearly 10 times that of ours. This has made the passenger car sector more crowded. An entrepreneur in the autonomous driving industry told \"Jiazi Guangnian\" that previously from<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Google</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BIDU\">Baidu</a>Entrepreneurs in the field of autonomous driving will prioritize passenger vehicle projects. For example, Wang Jin, founder of WeRide (formerly Jingchi Technology), and Lou Tiancheng, founder of Pony.ai, both chose the passenger vehicle field.</p><p>However, because passenger vehicles are directly related to people, safety has become a high hurdle, making their implementation and commercialization more difficult. It focused on autonomous driving in the passenger vehicle sector in 2018.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/V03.SI\">Startup company</a>Many of them didn't make it to this day.</p><p>Relatively speaking, it is actually easier to implement in the commercial sector. Chris Urmson, the pioneer of Google's self-driving cars and founder of Aurora, once explained: If there is a person in the back seat of your self-driving car, there will be many concerns. If there is a roll of toilet paper behind it, then it will be much less difficult to achieve.</p><p>Meanwhile, the market potential for driverless trucks alone is actually quite large. McKinsey data provides evidence: by utilizing driverless truck systems, the overall operating costs of the U.S. trucking industry will decrease by approximately 45%, saving approximately $85 billion to $125 billion. The situation is similar in China. In its recruitment section on its official website, TuSimple describes its business as \"an $800 billion industry.\"</p><p>There are relatively few competitors in the unmanned truck freight market. Sam Abuelsamid, chief research analyst at Guidehouse Insights and a senior contributor to Forbes, once said when commenting on Tucson: \"In the AV (autonomous driving) truck industry, they are certainly one of the leaders, if not the leaders.\"</p><p>This is a fairly small group. To avoid fierce competition from passenger vehicles, some autonomous driving companies have turned to truck freight. Starting in April 2019, Pony.ai also began to focus on the truck freight market, having previously focused on the passenger vehicle market.</p><p><b>3. What can be used to attract investors?</b></p><p>In the process of capital markets, Tucson took the lead. Zhijia Technologies is a direct competitor of TuSimple. Bloomberg previously reported that Zhijia wanted to go public as a SPAC in early 2021, but there has been no new progress so far.</p><p>\"Being the first\" is also very much in Chen Mo's style. Previously, during a phone call with Yuan Hongming, chairman of Shaanxi Automobile, he said: \"If others get started first, and you take a step back, won't the market be completely taken over?\"</p><p>How did TuSimple, which succeeded in getting ahead of the competition, attract secondary market investors? Transforming the truck market isn't exactly sexy, and autonomous driving isn't a household name.</p><p>One card Tucson is playing is high growth. In 2020, it received more than 5,700 letters of intent, and its financial revenue increased by 160% year-on-year. However, this is because the base is relatively small; even in the whole of 2020, Tucson's total revenue was only $1.843 million.</p><p>The potential for future growth is an even greater temptation offered by Tucson. In 2020, TuSimple launched the world's first driverless freight network (AFN), which formed the foundation for its commercialization. It stated in its prospectus: \"We expect to map the entire 46,000-mile U.S. interstate highway system by 2024.\"</p><p>In other words, three years from now, its AFN routes will be 16 times larger than today's, and L4 autonomous semi-trucks will be available on major transportation routes in all 48 states of the United States. But the prerequisite is that this plan must be successfully achieved.</p><p>Judging from the use of the raised funds, it is difficult to judge how TuSimple will promote its aforementioned plans. According to the prospectus, TuSimple will mainly use the funds raised from the IPO for the following three aspects: improving financial flexibility and market recognition, and hopes to use the net proceeds from this issuance for working capital and other general corporate purposes.</p><p>The common uses of funding for autonomous driving companies include expanding teams, promoting products, and supporting research and development. For example, the latest round of financing of $500 million by autonomous driving company Momenta is mainly used for product strategy, pushing its product \"flywheel\" to farther places; Zhijia Technology's financing in February this year will be focused on strengthening cooperation, mainly for building a comprehensive sales and support network; The funding raised by autonomous delivery company Nuro last November will be used to expand its team and manufacturing scale. Tucson clearly did not choose this conventional route.</p><p><b>4. How is its commercialization capability?</b></p><p>In its prospectus, TuSimple said it was “the first and only” company to implement Level 4 truck autonomous driving technology on highways and surface streets.</p><p>However, \"Jiazi Guangnian\" discovered that if we do not limit ourselves to \"highways\", \"surface streets\" and \"trucks\", there are many other companies that claim to have achieved Level 4 autonomous driving technology, each with its own scenario. For example, Pony.ai showcased its Level 4 autonomous driving heavy truck software and hardware system last November.</p><p>In addition, TuSimple's advantages highlighted in its prospectus include: 28,000 miles (approximately 4.506 million kilometers) of road test kilometers, partnerships with tier 1 component suppliers (including major operators such as Schneider Nationa, USXpress, and Werner Enterprises) and semi-truck original equipment manufacturers Navistar and TRATON to jointly build an autonomous freight ecosystem, etc.</p><p>There are some questions about this. Industry insiders in China have asked: If that's the case, why doesn't TuSimple provide services to domestic companies? \"The different policy environments between China and the United States are one thing, but autonomous driving also depends on the technology of wire control, and whether the technological capabilities of wire control are sufficient is another.\"</p><p>At this stage, no company has truly achieved commercialization; players in the industry are competing more on the potential for commercialization.</p><p>Pre-orders have become one of the important indicators for measuring the success of commercialization. One of the highlights of TuSimple's prospectus is that it received more than 5,700 pre-orders within four months. Like TuSimple, PlusDrive has also received pre-orders. According to the latest news, PlusDrive (PlusDrive's commercial vehicle autonomous driving system) has received more than 10,000 pre-orders for deployment by large fleets and heavy truck OEMs. The delivery date for Smart Plus is set for 2021.</p><p>Automakers are racing desperately to seize the initiative. According to the mass production timetable for autonomous vehicles given in the \"Intelligent Connected Vehicle Technology Roadmap 2.0\" released last November, the goal is to achieve large-scale application of highly autonomous driving technology by 2030. In other words, the official plan to achieve L4 is about 10 years away.</p><p>Even if automakers develop autonomous vehicles with Level 4 or higher capabilities, countries around the world are still exploring the rules for allocating responsibilities for Level 4 and above. This is also a hurdle that needs to be overcome in commercialization.</p><p><b>5. There is no timetable for profitability yet.</b></p><p>Not only TuSimple, but the marathon of the entire autonomous driving industry has only just taken its first step. Regarding profitability, TuSimple stated in its prospectus: \"There are no plans yet.\"</p><p>Like most tech companies, TuSimple is still operating at a loss. According to TuSimple's prospectus, as of December 31, 2020, TuSimple had suffered a total loss of $405.2 million (approximately RMB 2.64 billion) over five years, with a loss of $177.9 million (approximately RMB 1.16 billion) for the whole of 2020 alone. From 2018 to 2020, TuSimple's annual net loss was about twice that of the previous year.</p><p>The losses are very likely to continue. Chen Mo once said that it would take about $1 billion to make money from driverless truck freight.</p><p>The AFN ecosystem is still in the early stages of development and commercialization, and there is still a long way to go before it can become profitable. TuSimple's surge in revenue throughout 2020 was closely linked to its more than 5,700 undelivered pre-orders, but about 75% of these orders were placed by customers operating commercial truck fleets, which is still far from truly market-oriented operations.</p><p>Autonomous driving is an industry that requires continuous investment in research and development and maintaining innovation capabilities. According to data from research firm PitchBook, startups in the autonomous driving industry spend an average of $1.6 million (equivalent to 105.1 billion yuan) per month. WeRide CEO Han Xu has also revealed the company's spending speed: $300 million in 3 years and $500 million in 5 years.</p><p>Currently, of TuSimple's 839 employees, 673 are R&D personnel, accounting for 80%. From 2018 to 2020, the company's R&D expenditures were US$32.278 million, US$63.619 million, and US$132 million, respectively, accounting for more than 70% of total expenditures, and showing a slight upward trend.</p><p>As the commercialization process unfolds, operating costs may continue to increase, which may delay...<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/06838\">When profitable</a>Between. Between 2018 and 2020, TuSimple's marketing expenses were $1.085 million, $814,000, and $1.313 million, respectively, accounting for a relatively small proportion of its expenses. However, once mass production of L4 trucks is truly achieved, marketing and market expansion costs may also rise, and investors need to consider these factors when calculating profitability.</p><p>Take Google's Waymo as an example. It provides driverless taxi services to 1,500 passengers in Phoenix, USA, every month, but the revenue from this service is only tens of thousands of dollars. Revenue of this size is almost negligible, but it currently burns through Google's $1 billion annually. However, people's eyes are on the future, according to...<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UBS\">UBS</a>UBS predicts that Waymo's revenue could reach $114 billion by 2030.</p><p>Tucson's future needs to be built on the mass production of semiconductors. Currently, Tucson's semi-truck test vehicle still needs a safety officer and driver to be able to drive on the road. Chen Mo once stated that technically eliminating safety officers is a prerequisite for mass production. It is only possible to remove the safety officer when the hardware reliability meets the standards. For example, the machine can only operate continuously without downtime when the power supply reaches 4000 watt-hours, which is not yet possible with current hardware. Without sufficient technology, mass production is impossible, and without mass production, commercialization is impossible.</p><p><b>6. Who owns Tucson?</b></p><p>Prior to its IPO, TuSimple had completed 10 rounds of financing, raising over $650 million. Sina,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">NVIDIA</a>UPS, Navistar, and Mando, a Tier 1 automotive supplier in South Korea.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/0P6N.UK\">Volkswagen Group</a>TRATON, CDH Investments, and others are all shareholders of TuSimple.</p><p>According to the prospectus, prior to the IPO, Chen Mo, co-founder and chairman of TuSimple Future, held 9% of Class A shares and 50% of Class B shares. Co-founder and CTO Hou Xiaodi holds 8.3% of Class A shares and 50% of Class B shares.</p><p>Sun Dream Inc., a Sina affiliate, is TuSimple's largest outside shareholder, holding 31 million shares, or about 20% of its Class A shares. Sina CEO Cao Guowei and CFO Zhang Yi are both directors of TuSimple. Sina Micro Venture Capital participated in all of TuSimple's Series A to D financing rounds.</p><p>Sina's initial investment in TuSimple was likely due to its value for its pre-transformation product, namely image recognition technology for online advertising, and it never expected to become a shareholder of an autonomous driving company.</p><p>After the IPO, Chen Mo will hold 7.6% of the company's Class A shares and 50% of its Class B shares; Hou Xiaodi holds 7.1% of Class A shares and 50% of Class B shares. Sun Dream Inc. holds 13.1% of the Class A shares.</p><p>In addition, truck manufacturer Navistar International Corp. (NYSE: NAV) also holds 10.2 million Class A shares (6.5%) of TuSimple, giving Navistar a 5.4% stake after the IPO.</p><p>Among investors in the secondary market, there are also many well-known institutions that have bet on TuSimple. In the subscription news for this IPO,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BLK\">BlackRock</a>BlackRock, Fidelity, and Capital World Investors participated in the IPO subscription as cornerstone Investors, with an average subscription of 3,378,378 shares and a maximum subscription of 10,135,134 shares.</p>","source":"lsy1569753395102","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Disassembling TuSimple's Future: 6 Questions to Understand the World's First Autonomous Driving</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDisassembling TuSimple's Future: 6 Questions to Understand the World's First Autonomous Driving\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">甲子光年</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-04-15 15:34</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>By Gao Ya</p><p>Tonight, the \"world's first autonomous driving stock\" is coming. Barring any unforeseen circumstances, TuSimple Future (hereinafter referred to as \"TuSimple\") will be listed on Nasdaq on April 15, Eastern Time, under the ticker symbol TSP.</p><p>Contrary to the expectations of onlookers, the \"world's first autonomous driving stock\" was the first to free up the hands of truck drivers. On March 23 this year, TuSimple, an autonomous truck company, submitted its IPO application; On the 7th of this month, it further determined the price range and number of shares to be issued.</p><p>In this IPO, TuSimple plans to issue 33.78 million ADS, including 27.02 million shares issued by the company and those issued by existing shareholders.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SINA\">Sina</a>6.75 million shares were sold. Tucson has set an offering price range of $35 to $39. According to previous disclosures, TuSimple hopes to raise $800 million to $1 billion. If the IPO is successful, TuSimple's overall valuation is approximately $5 to $7 billion.</p><p>Some analysts believe that Tucson is likely to sell an additional $1 billion in stock \"because investors have an appetite.\" Financing is currently booming in the autonomous driving sector. According to a previous exclusive report by \"Jiazi Guangnian\", autonomous driving company Xidi Intelligent Driving has completed two rounds of financing within three months, and the latest round of financing has far exceeded the plan. Xidi Intelligent Driving is just a microcosm of the entire industry. In the first two months of 2021 alone, there were 24 investment and financing events in the autonomous driving industry, with a total disclosed investment and financing amount of 17.64 billion yuan.</p><p>With TuSimple's IPO, Nasdaq will also welcome the world's first listed autonomous driving company. The close contact between autonomous driving and the stock market has begun. In the race to go public, TuSimple emerged victorious.</p><p>\"Sixty Years of Light\" broke down TuSimple's prospectus to see what kind of company it is:</p><p>The autonomous driving sector is booming, and now is a good time to enter the secondary market, with TuSimple successfully taking the lead.</p><p>TuSimple aims to seize the world's first listed company in autonomous driving to prepare for its subsequent business development. According to its plan, Tucson aims to expand its autonomous freight network (AFN) throughout the continental United States by 2024.</p><p>Regarding the use of funds raised from the IPO, TuSimple currently does not plan to invest in research and development or products.</p><p>Compared to the passenger car sector, the driverless truck market seems to be a blue ocean. However, the technology has only just begun to be implemented and commercialized, and the marathon has only just begun.</p><p>TuSimple is still losing money and currently has no profit plans;</p><p>TuSimple's largest outside shareholder is Sun Dream Inc., an affiliate of Sina. How did this long-established internet company invest in an autonomous driving company? Intriguing.</p><p><b>1. Who is Tucson?</b></p><p>Tucson is a brand of driverless trucks. Founded in September 2015, it aims to empower the global logistics and transportation industry through artificial intelligence.</p><p>The company claims its vision is to revolutionize the approximately $4 trillion global trucking market. According to a report by consulting firm Armstrong & Associates, the total freight market in the United States generates $100 million in annual revenue, with trucking accounting for another 80%. The United States is currently Tucson's main market.</p><p>To achieve this goal, TuSimple has developed technologies for semi-trucks, namely commercially viable Level 4 autonomous driving solutions based on computer vision, unmanned transportation solutions for container trucks in highway scenarios and ports. Combined with the Autonomous Freight Network (AFN), TuSimple believes that long-distance truck transportation will be safer, more reliable, more efficient and environmentally friendly.</p><p>Level 4 autonomous driving (High Automation) refers to a vehicle that can automatically plan its route and avoid traffic congestion under the control of a trip computer, without the owner having to intervene.</p><p>In 2020, TuSimple's revenue was $1.84 million; In 2018, this figure was $9,000. In fact, similar companies in autonomous driving have recently enjoyed good times. In addition to the gradual maturation of the technology and the general increase in acceptance, the pandemic has also reduced contact between people.</p><p>The current \"TuSimple Future Co., Ltd.\" was formerly known as \"Beijing TuSimple Internet Technology Co., Ltd.\" In 2017, the company changed its name to \"TuSimple Future\" and its business shifted from providing technical services to autonomous driving. At the time, founder Chen Mo had his eye on the hot topic of autonomous driving. Chen Mo touts himself as \"a pragmatist\" and will choose the path closest to money.</p><p>This is also Chen Mo's fifth entrepreneurial venture. Before founding TuSimple, Chen Mo participated in the operation of three companies: Cangqiong Advertising (a building advertising platform), DeepBlue Brothers (a web game and card game platform), and CheGuo.com (an automotive O2O trading platform). However, in addition to seizing opportunities, starting a business also requires a bit of luck. The first three startups failed halfway through, until TuSimple was founded.</p><p>TuSimple's technological background comes from another founding member and CTO, Hou Xiaodi, who holds a PhD in Computing and Neuroscience from Caltech. He created the theory of visual attention mechanisms based on the frequency domain and has been referred to by the media as the prototype of \"campus hackers\".</p><p><b>2. Why did you choose a truck?</b></p><p>Autonomous driving can be divided into the passenger sector and the commercial sector. The half-card selected by Tucson belongs to the commercial field of autonomous driving. Domestic analysts often regard TuSimple, SmartPlus, and Pony.ai as the \"three new treasures\" of the unmanned freight market.</p><p>The market space for passenger vehicles is far larger than that for commercial vehicles. Chen Mo once told the media that their (passenger vehicle) market is nearly 10 times that of ours. This has made the passenger car sector more crowded. An entrepreneur in the autonomous driving industry told \"Jiazi Guangnian\" that previously from<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Google</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BIDU\">Baidu</a>Entrepreneurs in the field of autonomous driving will prioritize passenger vehicle projects. For example, Wang Jin, founder of WeRide (formerly Jingchi Technology), and Lou Tiancheng, founder of Pony.ai, both chose the passenger vehicle field.</p><p>However, because passenger vehicles are directly related to people, safety has become a high hurdle, making their implementation and commercialization more difficult. It focused on autonomous driving in the passenger vehicle sector in 2018.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/V03.SI\">Startup company</a>Many of them didn't make it to this day.</p><p>Relatively speaking, it is actually easier to implement in the commercial sector. Chris Urmson, the pioneer of Google's self-driving cars and founder of Aurora, once explained: If there is a person in the back seat of your self-driving car, there will be many concerns. If there is a roll of toilet paper behind it, then it will be much less difficult to achieve.</p><p>Meanwhile, the market potential for driverless trucks alone is actually quite large. McKinsey data provides evidence: by utilizing driverless truck systems, the overall operating costs of the U.S. trucking industry will decrease by approximately 45%, saving approximately $85 billion to $125 billion. The situation is similar in China. In its recruitment section on its official website, TuSimple describes its business as \"an $800 billion industry.\"</p><p>There are relatively few competitors in the unmanned truck freight market. Sam Abuelsamid, chief research analyst at Guidehouse Insights and a senior contributor to Forbes, once said when commenting on Tucson: \"In the AV (autonomous driving) truck industry, they are certainly one of the leaders, if not the leaders.\"</p><p>This is a fairly small group. To avoid fierce competition from passenger vehicles, some autonomous driving companies have turned to truck freight. Starting in April 2019, Pony.ai also began to focus on the truck freight market, having previously focused on the passenger vehicle market.</p><p><b>3. What can be used to attract investors?</b></p><p>In the process of capital markets, Tucson took the lead. Zhijia Technologies is a direct competitor of TuSimple. Bloomberg previously reported that Zhijia wanted to go public as a SPAC in early 2021, but there has been no new progress so far.</p><p>\"Being the first\" is also very much in Chen Mo's style. Previously, during a phone call with Yuan Hongming, chairman of Shaanxi Automobile, he said: \"If others get started first, and you take a step back, won't the market be completely taken over?\"</p><p>How did TuSimple, which succeeded in getting ahead of the competition, attract secondary market investors? Transforming the truck market isn't exactly sexy, and autonomous driving isn't a household name.</p><p>One card Tucson is playing is high growth. In 2020, it received more than 5,700 letters of intent, and its financial revenue increased by 160% year-on-year. However, this is because the base is relatively small; even in the whole of 2020, Tucson's total revenue was only $1.843 million.</p><p>The potential for future growth is an even greater temptation offered by Tucson. In 2020, TuSimple launched the world's first driverless freight network (AFN), which formed the foundation for its commercialization. It stated in its prospectus: \"We expect to map the entire 46,000-mile U.S. interstate highway system by 2024.\"</p><p>In other words, three years from now, its AFN routes will be 16 times larger than today's, and L4 autonomous semi-trucks will be available on major transportation routes in all 48 states of the United States. But the prerequisite is that this plan must be successfully achieved.</p><p>Judging from the use of the raised funds, it is difficult to judge how TuSimple will promote its aforementioned plans. According to the prospectus, TuSimple will mainly use the funds raised from the IPO for the following three aspects: improving financial flexibility and market recognition, and hopes to use the net proceeds from this issuance for working capital and other general corporate purposes.</p><p>The common uses of funding for autonomous driving companies include expanding teams, promoting products, and supporting research and development. For example, the latest round of financing of $500 million by autonomous driving company Momenta is mainly used for product strategy, pushing its product \"flywheel\" to farther places; Zhijia Technology's financing in February this year will be focused on strengthening cooperation, mainly for building a comprehensive sales and support network; The funding raised by autonomous delivery company Nuro last November will be used to expand its team and manufacturing scale. Tucson clearly did not choose this conventional route.</p><p><b>4. How is its commercialization capability?</b></p><p>In its prospectus, TuSimple said it was “the first and only” company to implement Level 4 truck autonomous driving technology on highways and surface streets.</p><p>However, \"Jiazi Guangnian\" discovered that if we do not limit ourselves to \"highways\", \"surface streets\" and \"trucks\", there are many other companies that claim to have achieved Level 4 autonomous driving technology, each with its own scenario. For example, Pony.ai showcased its Level 4 autonomous driving heavy truck software and hardware system last November.</p><p>In addition, TuSimple's advantages highlighted in its prospectus include: 28,000 miles (approximately 4.506 million kilometers) of road test kilometers, partnerships with tier 1 component suppliers (including major operators such as Schneider Nationa, USXpress, and Werner Enterprises) and semi-truck original equipment manufacturers Navistar and TRATON to jointly build an autonomous freight ecosystem, etc.</p><p>There are some questions about this. Industry insiders in China have asked: If that's the case, why doesn't TuSimple provide services to domestic companies? \"The different policy environments between China and the United States are one thing, but autonomous driving also depends on the technology of wire control, and whether the technological capabilities of wire control are sufficient is another.\"</p><p>At this stage, no company has truly achieved commercialization; players in the industry are competing more on the potential for commercialization.</p><p>Pre-orders have become one of the important indicators for measuring the success of commercialization. One of the highlights of TuSimple's prospectus is that it received more than 5,700 pre-orders within four months. Like TuSimple, PlusDrive has also received pre-orders. According to the latest news, PlusDrive (PlusDrive's commercial vehicle autonomous driving system) has received more than 10,000 pre-orders for deployment by large fleets and heavy truck OEMs. The delivery date for Smart Plus is set for 2021.</p><p>Automakers are racing desperately to seize the initiative. According to the mass production timetable for autonomous vehicles given in the \"Intelligent Connected Vehicle Technology Roadmap 2.0\" released last November, the goal is to achieve large-scale application of highly autonomous driving technology by 2030. In other words, the official plan to achieve L4 is about 10 years away.</p><p>Even if automakers develop autonomous vehicles with Level 4 or higher capabilities, countries around the world are still exploring the rules for allocating responsibilities for Level 4 and above. This is also a hurdle that needs to be overcome in commercialization.</p><p><b>5. There is no timetable for profitability yet.</b></p><p>Not only TuSimple, but the marathon of the entire autonomous driving industry has only just taken its first step. Regarding profitability, TuSimple stated in its prospectus: \"There are no plans yet.\"</p><p>Like most tech companies, TuSimple is still operating at a loss. According to TuSimple's prospectus, as of December 31, 2020, TuSimple had suffered a total loss of $405.2 million (approximately RMB 2.64 billion) over five years, with a loss of $177.9 million (approximately RMB 1.16 billion) for the whole of 2020 alone. From 2018 to 2020, TuSimple's annual net loss was about twice that of the previous year.</p><p>The losses are very likely to continue. Chen Mo once said that it would take about $1 billion to make money from driverless truck freight.</p><p>The AFN ecosystem is still in the early stages of development and commercialization, and there is still a long way to go before it can become profitable. TuSimple's surge in revenue throughout 2020 was closely linked to its more than 5,700 undelivered pre-orders, but about 75% of these orders were placed by customers operating commercial truck fleets, which is still far from truly market-oriented operations.</p><p>Autonomous driving is an industry that requires continuous investment in research and development and maintaining innovation capabilities. According to data from research firm PitchBook, startups in the autonomous driving industry spend an average of $1.6 million (equivalent to 105.1 billion yuan) per month. WeRide CEO Han Xu has also revealed the company's spending speed: $300 million in 3 years and $500 million in 5 years.</p><p>Currently, of TuSimple's 839 employees, 673 are R&D personnel, accounting for 80%. From 2018 to 2020, the company's R&D expenditures were US$32.278 million, US$63.619 million, and US$132 million, respectively, accounting for more than 70% of total expenditures, and showing a slight upward trend.</p><p>As the commercialization process unfolds, operating costs may continue to increase, which may delay...<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/06838\">When profitable</a>Between. Between 2018 and 2020, TuSimple's marketing expenses were $1.085 million, $814,000, and $1.313 million, respectively, accounting for a relatively small proportion of its expenses. However, once mass production of L4 trucks is truly achieved, marketing and market expansion costs may also rise, and investors need to consider these factors when calculating profitability.</p><p>Take Google's Waymo as an example. It provides driverless taxi services to 1,500 passengers in Phoenix, USA, every month, but the revenue from this service is only tens of thousands of dollars. Revenue of this size is almost negligible, but it currently burns through Google's $1 billion annually. However, people's eyes are on the future, according to...<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UBS\">UBS</a>UBS predicts that Waymo's revenue could reach $114 billion by 2030.</p><p>Tucson's future needs to be built on the mass production of semiconductors. Currently, Tucson's semi-truck test vehicle still needs a safety officer and driver to be able to drive on the road. Chen Mo once stated that technically eliminating safety officers is a prerequisite for mass production. It is only possible to remove the safety officer when the hardware reliability meets the standards. For example, the machine can only operate continuously without downtime when the power supply reaches 4000 watt-hours, which is not yet possible with current hardware. Without sufficient technology, mass production is impossible, and without mass production, commercialization is impossible.</p><p><b>6. Who owns Tucson?</b></p><p>Prior to its IPO, TuSimple had completed 10 rounds of financing, raising over $650 million. Sina,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">NVIDIA</a>UPS, Navistar, and Mando, a Tier 1 automotive supplier in South Korea.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/0P6N.UK\">Volkswagen Group</a>TRATON, CDH Investments, and others are all shareholders of TuSimple.</p><p>According to the prospectus, prior to the IPO, Chen Mo, co-founder and chairman of TuSimple Future, held 9% of Class A shares and 50% of Class B shares. Co-founder and CTO Hou Xiaodi holds 8.3% of Class A shares and 50% of Class B shares.</p><p>Sun Dream Inc., a Sina affiliate, is TuSimple's largest outside shareholder, holding 31 million shares, or about 20% of its Class A shares. Sina CEO Cao Guowei and CFO Zhang Yi are both directors of TuSimple. Sina Micro Venture Capital participated in all of TuSimple's Series A to D financing rounds.</p><p>Sina's initial investment in TuSimple was likely due to its value for its pre-transformation product, namely image recognition technology for online advertising, and it never expected to become a shareholder of an autonomous driving company.</p><p>After the IPO, Chen Mo will hold 7.6% of the company's Class A shares and 50% of its Class B shares; Hou Xiaodi holds 7.1% of Class A shares and 50% of Class B shares. Sun Dream Inc. holds 13.1% of the Class A shares.</p><p>In addition, truck manufacturer Navistar International Corp. (NYSE: NAV) also holds 10.2 million Class A shares (6.5%) of TuSimple, giving Navistar a 5.4% stake after the IPO.</p><p>Among investors in the secondary market, there are also many well-known institutions that have bet on TuSimple. In the subscription news for this IPO,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BLK\">BlackRock</a>BlackRock, Fidelity, and Capital World Investors participated in the IPO subscription as cornerstone Investors, with an average subscription of 3,378,378 shares and a maximum subscription of 10,135,134 shares.</p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"http://finance.sina.com.cn/tech/csj/2021-04-15/doc-ikmyaawa9815441.shtml\">甲子光年</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c360efedfdf306e30d535692b886657e","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"http://finance.sina.com.cn/tech/csj/2021-04-15/doc-ikmyaawa9815441.shtml","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1111977847","content_text":"文/高雅\n就在今天晚上，“全球自动驾驶第一股”要来了。如果不出意外，美东时间4月15日，图森未来（以下简称“图森”）将在纳斯达克上市，股票代码TSP。\n与此前看客们的期待不同，“全球自动驾驶第一股”率先解放的，是货车司机们的双手。今年3月23日，自动驾驶卡车企业图森递交了IPO申请；本月7日，其进一步确定了股票发行价格区间和发售数量。\n此次上市，图森准备发行3,378万股ADS，其中包含公司发行的2,702万股和现有股东新浪出售的675万股。图森已确定的发行价区间为35美元到39美元。按此前披露，图森希望能募集8~10亿美元。如果顺利上市，图森的整体估值约为50~70亿美元。\n有分析师认为，图森很可能能多出售10亿美元的股票，“因为投资人有胃口”。自动驾驶赛道当下融资火热。据“甲子光年”此前的独家消息，自动驾驶公司希迪智驾在三个月内完成了两次融资，最新一轮融资也远超计划。希迪智驾只是整个赛道的一个缩影，仅在2021的前两个月，自动驾驶行业的投融资事件已有24起，披露投融资总金额为176.4亿元。\n随着图森上市，纳斯达克也将迎来全球第一家上市的自动驾驶公司。自动驾驶与股市的亲密接触拉开序幕。在上市这场竞逐赛中，图森抢跑成功。\n“甲子光年”拆解了图森的招股书，来看看这是家什么样的企业：\n无人驾驶赛道火热，此时是登陆二级市场的好时候，图森抢跑成功；\n抢占全球自动驾驶第一股，图森是要为后续业务开展准备粮草。按其计划，到2024年图森要在整个美国大陆扩展其自主货运网络（AFN）；\n上市募集的资金用途，图森目前的计划中没有研发和产品投入；\n相比乘用赛道，无人驾驶货车市场似乎是片蓝海。但技术落地、商业化才起步，马拉松才开跑；\n图森仍在亏损，目前没有盈利计划；\n图森最大的外部股东是新浪的关联公司Sun Dream Inc.。这家老牌互联网公司怎么投出了一家自动驾驶公司？耐人寻味。\n1.图森是谁？\n图森是一个无人驾驶卡车品牌。它成立于2015年9月，想要通过人工智能为全球物流运输业赋能。\n这家公司宣称，其愿景是彻底变革约4万亿美元全球卡车运输市场。咨询机构Armstrong & Assocates的报告称，其中美国总货运市场年收入为1亿美元，卡车货运又占80%。美国是图森目前的主要市场。\n为实现这个目的，图森开发了针对半卡车的技术，即计算机视觉为主的可商用L4级自动驾驶解决方案、高速场景及港内集装箱卡车的无人驾驶运输解决方案，加上自动驾驶货运网络(AFN)，图森相信将使长途卡车运输更加安全、可靠、高效、环保。\n所谓L4级无人驾驶（High Automation），是指车辆在行车电脑的控制下能自动规划行驶路线、躲避交通拥堵路段等，车主可以不介入操作。\n2020年，图森收入184万美元；2018年这个数字为9000美元。实际上自动驾驶的同类公司近期都迎来了好日子，除了技术逐渐走向成熟、接受度普遍提高，还有疫情减少了人和人之间的接触。\n现在的“图森未来有限公司”，前身是“北京图森互联科技有限责任公司”。2017年时公司更名为“图森未来”，业务也从提供技术服务转向自动驾驶。当时，创始人陈墨看上了火热的自动驾驶。陈墨标榜自己是“一名实用主义者”，会选择离钱最近的道路。\n这也是陈墨的第五次创业。在创立图森之前，陈墨先后参与运营了三家公司，分别是苍穹广告（一家楼宇广告平台）、深蓝兄弟（页游棋牌平台）和车国网（汽车O2O交易平台）。只不过，创业除了要抢先机，还需要一点运气。前三次创业先后中道崩殂，直到有了图森。\n图森的技术底色则来源于另一位创始成员、CTO侯晓迪，后者是加州理工计算与神经系统的博士，创立了基于频域的视觉注意机制理论，被媒体称为是“校园黑客”的原型。\n2.为什么选了卡车？\n自动驾驶可以被分为乘用领域和商用领域。图森选择的半卡属于无人驾驶的商用领域。国内分析人士常把图森、智加、小马智行看作是无人货运市场的“新势力三宝”。\n乘用车的市场空间远远大于商用车。陈墨就曾对媒体表示，他们（乘用车）的市场是我们的将近10倍。这造成了乘用领域的赛道更拥挤。一位自动驾驶行业的创业者告诉“甲子光年”，此前从谷歌、百度自动驾驶方向出来的创业者都会优先选乘用车项目。比如文远知行（原景驰科技）创始人王劲、小马智行创始人楼天城都选择了乘用领域。\n但乘用车因为与人直接相关，安全问题成了一道较高的门槛，导致其落地和商业化难度更高。曾在2018年发力乘用车领域的自动驾驶创业公司，有不少没能撑到今天。\n相对而言，商用领域其实更好落地。Google无人车的开创者、Aurora创始人克里斯·厄姆森曾经这样解释：如果你的自动驾驶后座上是个人，那顾虑会很多。如果后面就是一卷卫生纸，那实现起来难度就会小得多。\n同时，仅无人驾驶货车市场而言，其实市场空间不小。麦肯锡的数据给出了佐证：通过利用无人驾驶货车系统，美国卡车运输业的整体运营成本将下降约45%，可节省约850亿至1250亿美元。在中国，情况也如出一辙。图森在自己官网的招聘栏目中，将自己的事业描述为“一个价值8000亿美元的产业”。\n无人卡车货运市场竞争者相对较少。Guidehouse Insights首席研究分析师、《福布斯》资深撰稿人萨姆·阿伯萨米德(Sam Abuelsamid)评价图森时就曾说过：在AV（自动驾驶）卡车行业，他们即使不是领导者，也肯定是领导者之一。\n这是一个相当小的群体。为避开乘用车的激烈竞争，也有自动驾驶企业转向卡车货运的。2019年4月起，小马智行也开始发力卡车货运市场，此前其专注的是乘用车市场。\n3.拿什么吸引投资人？\n在资本市场的进程中，图森抢先了一步。智加科技是图森的直接竞争对手，此前彭博社就报道过智加想在2021年初以SPAC方式上市的消息，不过迄今没有新的进展。\n“抢先”也很有陈默的风格。此前其与陕汽董事长袁宏明通电话时就曾说过：要是别人先做起来了，您慢一步，市场不就被占光了？\n抢跑成功的图森，靠什么吸引二级市场投资人？变革卡车市场并不那么性感，无人驾驶也不是耳熟能详的事情。\n图森打出来的一张牌，是高增长。2020年它拿到了5700多个意向预订单，财务收入同比增长160%。不过，这是因为基数比较小，即使2020年全年，图森的总收入也不过184.3万美元。\n未来的可能增长是图森给出的更大诱惑。2020年，图森启动了全球首个无人驾驶货运网络（AFN），这是其商业化的基础。它在招股书中这么说：预计到2024年，我们将绘制整个4.6万英里的美国州际公路系统。\n也就是说，3年后其AFN的路线将是今天的16倍，到时候美国48个州的主要运输路线上都可以看到L4自主半卡车。但前提是，这个计划要顺利达成。\n如果从募资资金的用途看，还很难判断图森将如何推动它的上述规划。按招股书披露，图森将IPO募集的资金主要用于以下三方面：提高财务灵活性以及在市场上的知名度，并希望将此次发行的净收益用于营运资金和其他一般公司用途。\n自动驾驶公司的融资用途，常见的资金去向为扩建团队、产品推广和助力研发。比如自动驾驶公司Momenta最新一轮5亿美元的融资主要用于产品战略，将其产品“飞轮”推往更远的地方；智加科技今年2月的融资将放在强化合作上，主要用于构建完善的销售和支持网络；自动驾驶送货公司Nuro去年11月的融资将用于扩大团队和制造规模。图森显然没有选择这条常规路线。\n4.商业化能力怎么样？\n在招股书中，图森说自己是“第一家也是唯一一家”在高速公路和地面街道上实现L4级别卡车自动驾驶技术的公司。\n但“甲子光年”发现，如果不限定“高速公路”、“地面街道”和“卡车”，说自己实现了L4级自动驾驶技术的还有很多家，每家都有各自的场景。比如小马智行去年11月就展示了L4级自动驾驶重卡软硬件系统。\n此外，图森在招股书中强调的优势还包括：2.8万英里（约合450.6万公里）的路测公里数、和处于tier 1的零部件供应商（其中包括Schneider Nationa，U.S.Xpress和Werner Enterprises等主要运营商）以及半卡车原始设备制造商Navistar和TRATON合作，共同打造自动驾驶的货运生态等等。\n对此，并不是没有质疑。国内自动驾驶业内人士就问：既然如此，为什么图森没给国内的公司提供服务呢？“中美的政策环境不一样是一方面，自动驾驶还要看线控的技术，线控的技术能力够不够是另一方面。”\n在当前这个阶段，实际上还没有哪一家公司能真正实现商业化，行业内的选手比拼的更多是商业化的潜力。\n预订单成了衡量商业化落地的重要指标之一。图森招股书中的一大亮点是，其在4个月内获得了5700多个意向预订单。但与图森一样，智加也拿到预订单，按照最新消息，PlusDrive（智加科技商用车自动驾驶系统）已获得超过10,000台可供大型车队及重卡主机厂部署的预定单。智加的交付时间定在了2021年。\n车企们都在拼命奔跑，试图抢占先机。按照去年11月发布的《智能网联汽车技术路线图2.0》给出的自动驾驶车型量产时间表，是在2030年实现高度自动驾驶技术的规模应用。也就是说，实现L4的官方计划大约还有10年。\n即使车企研发出了具备L4及以上的自动驾驶汽车，目前世界各国对L4以上级别的责任分配规则仍还在探索中。这也是商业化需要迈过的一道坎儿。\n5.盈利还没有时间表\n不仅图森，自动驾驶整个行业的马拉松也才迈出第一步。表现在盈利上，图森在招股书中的表述是：还没有计划。\n像大部分科技公司一样，图森仍处于亏损状态。据图森招股书，截至2020年12月31日，图森5年共计亏损4.052亿美元（约为人民币26.4亿），仅2020年全年就亏损了1.779亿美元（约为人民币11.6亿）。从2018年到2020年，图森每年的净亏损额度都是上一年的两倍左右。\n亏损极有可能还将持续。陈默曾说过，要实现无人驾驶卡车货运赚钱，大概需要10亿美元。\nAFN生态系统目前仍处于开发和商业化早期的阶段，要想实现盈利还有一段路要走。2020年，图森全年营收的暴增与那5700多个未交付的预订单紧密相关，但这些订单中大约75%是由运营商用卡车车队的客户提出的，离着真正市场化运营还有距离。\n自动驾驶是一个需要不断投入研发、保持创新能力的行业。据研究机构PitchBook数据，自动驾驶行业里的创业公司平均每月耗掉160万美金（折合1051亿元人民币）。文远知行CEO韩旭也曾透露过公司的花钱速度：3年3亿美元，5年5亿美元。\n目前，图森839名员工中，673人都是研发人员，占比80%。2018至2020年，公司的研发支出分别为3227.8万美元、6361.9万美元和1.32亿美元，在总支出中的占比都超过七成，而且有略微上升的势头。\n随着商业化过程的展开，运营成本可能持续增加，这可能延后盈利时间。在2018至2020年的三年间，图森的营销费用分别为108.5万美元、81.4万美元、131.3万美元，占支出比重较小。但真正实现L4卡车量产后，营销、市场拓展费用也有可能水涨船高，投资人们在计算盈利可能性时也需要考虑这些因素。\n以谷歌旗下的Waymo为例，每个月给美国凤凰城1500名乘客提供无人驾驶出租车服务，但这项服务的营收不过区区上万美元。这样规模的营收几乎可以忽略不计，但目前每年都要烧掉谷歌10亿美元。不过人们的眼光在未来，据瑞银(UBS)预测，到2030年，Waymo的营收可能达到1140亿美元。\n图森的未来，需要建立在半卡的量产基础上。目前，图森的半卡测试车还需要配备一位安全员和司机才能上路。陈墨曾表示，技术上可以去掉安全员是量产的前提。只有硬件可靠性达标时，才有可能去掉安全员。比如，在机器供电可以达到4000瓦时，机器才可以持续运行、不出现宕机的情况，而目前的硬件还无法达到这个水平。技术水平不足就无法实现量产，没法量产就谈不上商业化。\n6.谁在持有图森？\n在IPO之前，图森已经累计获得完成10轮融资、累计募资超过6.5亿美元，新浪、英伟达、UPS、Navistar、韩国汽车一级供应商万都、大众集团TRATON、鼎晖投资等都是图森的股东。\n按招股书信息，IPO之前图森未来联合创始人、董事长陈默持有9%的A类股，50%的B类股；联合创始人、CTO侯晓迪持有8.3%的A类股，及50%的B类股。\n新浪的关联公司Sun Dream Inc.是图森最大的外部股东，持有3,100万股股票，占A级股比例约20%。新浪CEO曹国伟、CFO张怿都是图森董事。在图森A轮到D轮的融资中，新浪微创投均参与投资。\n新浪最初投资图森的原因，很可能是看重其转型前的产品，即在线广告的图像识别技术，没想到成了一家自动驾驶公司的股东。\nIPO后，陈默将持有公司7.6%的A类股，及50%的B类股；侯晓迪持有7.1%的A类股，及50%的B类股。Sun Dream Inc.持股13.1%的A类股。\n此外，卡车制造商Navistar International Corp.（NYSE：NAV）也持有图森1020万A类股（6.5%），上市之后，Navistar的持股比例为5.4%。\n二级市场的投资人中，也不乏知名机构押注图森的。此次IPO的认购消息中，贝莱德（BlackRock）、富达（Fidelity）和资本世界投资者(Capital World Investors)三家投资机构作为基石投资者参与IPO认购，平均认购3,378,378股，最高一共认购10,135,134股。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSP":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1345,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":344031492,"gmtCreate":1618359317816,"gmtModify":1704709571897,"author":{"id":"3536928846214760","authorId":"3536928846214760","name":"東海吉龍","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0ef8466588cf515f97a20c636e2be8a0","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3536928846214760","authorIdStr":"3536928846214760"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"666","listText":"666","text":"666","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/344031492","repostId":"2127045758","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2127045758","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1618351055,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2127045758?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-14 05:57","market":"hk","language":"zh","title":"Tesla surged 8.6% at the close on Tuesday, bringing its market capitalization back above $700 billion.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2127045758","media":"新浪财经","summary":"特斯拉股价周二收盘大涨8.6%，领跑热门科技股和纽交所新能源汽车类股，报762.32美元，创2月19日以来收盘新高。该股周二成交额达到327.2亿美元，位居美股成交额榜首，市值重新站上7000亿美元。Canaccord分析师Jed Dorsheimer将特斯拉股票评级从“持有”上调至“买入”，目标价从419美元上调至1071美元，预计到2025年，特斯拉能源生产和储能部门将产生80亿美元收入。其中，特斯拉将是第一个上市的股权代币，并于4月12日在该平台开放部分交易。","content":"<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/811f4220ec7872735330397a4dabe441\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\"><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla</a>Shares surged 8.6% at the close on Tuesday, leading popular technology stocks and NYSE new energy vehicle stocks to $762.32, a new closing high since February 19. The stock reached $32.72 billion in trading volume on Tuesday, topping the U.S. stock market by volume, and its market capitalization has once again surpassed $700 billion.</p><p>Previously, analysts at investment bank Canaccord Genuity stated that as Tesla increases its focus on energy production and storage, the company known for its electric vehicles will inevitably \"attack and conquer\" another trillion-dollar market. Canaccord analyst Jed Dorsheimer upgraded Tesla's stock rating from \"hold\" to \"buy\" and raised his price target from $419 to $1,071, projecting that Tesla's energy generation and storage division will generate $8 billion in revenue by 2025.</p><p>In addition, in terms of news, cryptocurrency exchange Binance previously announced the launch of a zero-commission tradable equity token called Binance Stock Tokens (BST), allowing users to trade individual stocks. Tesla will be the first equity token to be listed, and some trading will open on the platform on April 12.</p>","source":"sina_symbol","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla surged 8.6% at the close on Tuesday, bringing its market capitalization back above $700 billion.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla surged 8.6% at the close on Tuesday, bringing its market capitalization back above $700 billion.\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">新浪财经</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-04-14 05:57</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/811f4220ec7872735330397a4dabe441\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\"><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla</a>Shares surged 8.6% at the close on Tuesday, leading popular technology stocks and NYSE new energy vehicle stocks to $762.32, a new closing high since February 19. The stock reached $32.72 billion in trading volume on Tuesday, topping the U.S. stock market by volume, and its market capitalization has once again surpassed $700 billion.</p><p>Previously, analysts at investment bank Canaccord Genuity stated that as Tesla increases its focus on energy production and storage, the company known for its electric vehicles will inevitably \"attack and conquer\" another trillion-dollar market. Canaccord analyst Jed Dorsheimer upgraded Tesla's stock rating from \"hold\" to \"buy\" and raised his price target from $419 to $1,071, projecting that Tesla's energy generation and storage division will generate $8 billion in revenue by 2025.</p><p>In addition, in terms of news, cryptocurrency exchange Binance previously announced the launch of a zero-commission tradable equity token called Binance Stock Tokens (BST), allowing users to trade individual stocks. Tesla will be the first equity token to be listed, and some trading will open on the platform on April 12.</p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"https://cj.sina.cn/article/normal_detail?url=https://finance.sina.com.cn/stock/usstock/c/2021-04-14/doc-ikmxzfmk6663473.shtml\">新浪财经</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1758ac5dbd4a135a251f043ec0fbc95f","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://cj.sina.cn/article/normal_detail?url=https://finance.sina.com.cn/stock/usstock/c/2021-04-14/doc-ikmxzfmk6663473.shtml","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2127045758","content_text":"特斯拉股价周二收盘大涨8.6%，领跑热门科技股和纽交所新能源汽车类股，报762.32美元，创2月19日以来收盘新高。该股周二成交额达到327.2亿美元，位居美股成交额榜首，市值重新站上7000亿美元。\n此前，投行Canaccord Genuity分析师表示，随着特斯拉加强对能源生产和储能业务的关注，这家以电动汽车闻名的公司必将“攻击并征服”另一个规模达万亿美元的市场。Canaccord分析师Jed Dorsheimer将特斯拉股票评级从“持有”上调至“买入”，目标价从419美元上调至1071美元，预计到2025年，特斯拉能源生产和储能部门将产生80亿美元收入。\n此外，消息面上，加密货币交易平台币安此前宣布推出名为Binance Stock Tokens（BST）的零佣金可交易股权代币，允许用户交易零散股票。其中，特斯拉将是第一个上市的股权代币，并于4月12日在该平台开放部分交易。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1354,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":133957781,"gmtCreate":1621689414443,"gmtModify":1704361490545,"author":{"id":"3536928846214760","authorId":"3536928846214760","name":"東海吉龍","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0ef8466588cf515f97a20c636e2be8a0","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3536928846214760","idStr":"3536928846214760"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"666","listText":"666","text":"666","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/133957781","repostId":"1118299916","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1118299916","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1621678031,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1118299916?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-22 18:07","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Bill Gates is under investigation for \"close relationships,\" which could affect the division of his assets.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1118299916","media":"央视财经","summary":"盖茨确实在20年前有过一段婚外情。","content":"<p>After announcing their divorce, regarding Bill Gates and<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a>Reports of inappropriate relationships between female employees have been rampant. According to The Wall Street Journal, Microsoft's board of directors decided last year that Gates was no longer suitable to continue serving on the board after investigating his past close relationship with a female Microsoft employee.</p><p>A spokesperson for Gates acknowledged that he did have an extramarital affair 20 years ago, but denied that Gates' departure from the Microsoft board was directly related to the incident.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d3c235491c4dd6fdf7ee7547fb3f4ae5\" tg-width=\"649\" tg-height=\"332\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>In the United States, many large companies prohibit executives from dating their subordinates. In 2019,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MCD\">McDonald's</a>The company's former CEO was dismissed by the board of directors for having an intimate relationship with a female employee.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/48e7630ab78f177b4beef70b1b57a49e\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"328\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Recent reports could not only damage Gates' personal reputation, but also put him at a disadvantage in the division of property in the divorce case. It is reported that Gates has transferred at least $3 billion to Melinda since announcing his divorce.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9582961d249d905e99b9f1d934c13167\" tg-width=\"656\" tg-height=\"330\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>According to another report, Microsoft's current CEO Satya Nadella said on Friday that corporate executives should not abuse the power they are given. This is the first time a Microsoft executive has commented since media reports that Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates had an affair with an employee in 2000.</p><p>Since Nadella became CEO in 2014, Microsoft has not faced many controversies. Nadella is considered a thoughtful leader who helped Microsoft rebuild in the highly competitive technology industry. During this period, Nadella did not encounter many complicated problems.</p><p>But now Nadella faces a thorny problem that his predecessor (Gates) single-handedly created 20 years ago, when Nadella was just one of many vice presidents at Microsoft.</p><p>In response, Nadella said in a recent interview: \"In general, power in the workplace cannot be abused in any form. For us, the most important thing is to ensure that everyone can feel free to ask any questions they see and that we can conduct a full investigation.\"</p><p>According to a Microsoft spokesperson, in the second half of 2019, Microsoft received a report alleging that Gates had attempted to establish an intimate relationship with an employee in 2000. With the help of a law firm, Microsoft investigated the matter. Last weekend, some media reported on this investigation. Shortly before this, Gates had just announced his divorce.</p><p>In the interview, Della also stated that Microsoft has had a policy prohibiting executive misconduct since 2006. Before this, Nadella had not dealt with many difficult problems, although he had encountered some troubles.</p><p>In 2014, Nadella faced some criticism because he advised female employees not to ask for a raise. Nadella stated at the time that women would receive long-term rewards when their excellent work was recognized if they did not demand more salary from their employers. Nadella later apologized for this.</p><p>In 2019, Nadella defended the move after some employees protested Microsoft's contract to provide augmented reality (AR) headsets to the U.S. military. He said, \"We have made a principled decision that we will not refuse to provide technology to our democratically elected institutions to protect the freedoms we enjoy.\"</p>","source":"YSCJ","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Bill Gates is under investigation for \"close relationships,\" which could affect the division of his assets.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBill Gates is under investigation for \"close relationships,\" which could affect the division of his assets.\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">央视财经</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-05-22 18:07</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>After announcing their divorce, regarding Bill Gates and<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a>Reports of inappropriate relationships between female employees have been rampant. According to The Wall Street Journal, Microsoft's board of directors decided last year that Gates was no longer suitable to continue serving on the board after investigating his past close relationship with a female Microsoft employee.</p><p>A spokesperson for Gates acknowledged that he did have an extramarital affair 20 years ago, but denied that Gates' departure from the Microsoft board was directly related to the incident.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d3c235491c4dd6fdf7ee7547fb3f4ae5\" tg-width=\"649\" tg-height=\"332\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>In the United States, many large companies prohibit executives from dating their subordinates. In 2019,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MCD\">McDonald's</a>The company's former CEO was dismissed by the board of directors for having an intimate relationship with a female employee.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/48e7630ab78f177b4beef70b1b57a49e\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"328\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Recent reports could not only damage Gates' personal reputation, but also put him at a disadvantage in the division of property in the divorce case. It is reported that Gates has transferred at least $3 billion to Melinda since announcing his divorce.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9582961d249d905e99b9f1d934c13167\" tg-width=\"656\" tg-height=\"330\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>According to another report, Microsoft's current CEO Satya Nadella said on Friday that corporate executives should not abuse the power they are given. This is the first time a Microsoft executive has commented since media reports that Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates had an affair with an employee in 2000.</p><p>Since Nadella became CEO in 2014, Microsoft has not faced many controversies. Nadella is considered a thoughtful leader who helped Microsoft rebuild in the highly competitive technology industry. During this period, Nadella did not encounter many complicated problems.</p><p>But now Nadella faces a thorny problem that his predecessor (Gates) single-handedly created 20 years ago, when Nadella was just one of many vice presidents at Microsoft.</p><p>In response, Nadella said in a recent interview: \"In general, power in the workplace cannot be abused in any form. For us, the most important thing is to ensure that everyone can feel free to ask any questions they see and that we can conduct a full investigation.\"</p><p>According to a Microsoft spokesperson, in the second half of 2019, Microsoft received a report alleging that Gates had attempted to establish an intimate relationship with an employee in 2000. With the help of a law firm, Microsoft investigated the matter. Last weekend, some media reported on this investigation. Shortly before this, Gates had just announced his divorce.</p><p>In the interview, Della also stated that Microsoft has had a policy prohibiting executive misconduct since 2006. Before this, Nadella had not dealt with many difficult problems, although he had encountered some troubles.</p><p>In 2014, Nadella faced some criticism because he advised female employees not to ask for a raise. Nadella stated at the time that women would receive long-term rewards when their excellent work was recognized if they did not demand more salary from their employers. Nadella later apologized for this.</p><p>In 2019, Nadella defended the move after some employees protested Microsoft's contract to provide augmented reality (AR) headsets to the U.S. military. He said, \"We have made a principled decision that we will not refuse to provide technology to our democratically elected institutions to protect the freedoms we enjoy.\"</p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"https://finance.sina.com.cn/stock/usstock/c/2021-05-22/doc-ikmyaawc6885660.shtml\">央视财经</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f5f084842fb3799c40f34178d55cdc2f","relate_stocks":{"MSFT":"微软"},"source_url":"https://finance.sina.com.cn/stock/usstock/c/2021-05-22/doc-ikmyaawc6885660.shtml","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1118299916","content_text":"宣布离婚后，关于比尔·盖茨与微软女员工存在不当关系的报道就层出不穷。据《华尔街日报》报道称，微软董事会对盖茨和一名微软女员工曾经的亲密关系进行调查后，在去年做出决定，认为盖茨不再适合继续在董事会任职。一名盖茨的发言人承认，盖茨确实在20年前有过一段婚外情，不过否认了盖茨离开微软董事会与这一事件的直接关系。在美国，不少大型公司都禁止高管与下属恋爱，2019年，麦当劳公司前CEO就因为与一名女员工存在亲密关系而被董事会解聘。近期的报道不仅可能有损盖茨的个人名誉，也可能使其在离婚官司的财产分割中陷于不利。据悉，在宣布离婚后，盖茨已经向梅琳达转账至少30亿美元。另据报道，微软现任CEO萨蒂亚·纳德拉（Satya Nadella）周五表示，企业高管不应滥用其被赋予的权力。这是在媒体报道微软联合创始人比尔·盖茨（Bill Gates）在2000年与一名员工有染后，微软高管首次发表评论。自纳德拉2014年出任CEO以来，微软并未面临太多争议。纳德拉被认为是一位深思熟虑的领导者，在竞争激烈的科技行业，他帮助微软重振旗鼓。期间，纳德拉并未遭遇太多复杂的问题。但如今，纳德拉却面临一个棘手的问题，他的前任（盖茨）在20年前一手酿成的，当时纳德拉只是微软公司众多副总裁之中的一位。对此，纳德拉日前在接受采访时表示：“总的来说，职场的权力不能以任何形式被滥用。对我们来说，最重要的是确保每个人都能放心地提出他们看到的任何问题，并让我们能够对此进行全面调查。”据微软发言人称，2019年下半年，微软收到一份报告，称盖茨在2000年曾试图与一名员工建立亲密关系。在一家律师事务所的帮助下，微软对此进行了调查。上周末，有媒体报道了这项调查。而此之前不久，盖茨刚刚宣布离婚。德拉在采访中还表示，自2006年以来，微软一直有禁止高管不当行为的政策。在此之前，纳德拉并未处理过太多棘手的问题，尽管他也遭遇过一些麻烦。2014年，纳德拉曾面临一些批评，因为他建议女性员工别要求加薪。纳德拉当时称，如果女性不向雇主索要更多薪水，那么当她们的优异工作得到认可时，也会得到长期的奖励。后来，纳德拉对此进行了道歉。2019年，在一些员工抗议微软向美国军队提供增强现实（AR）头盔的合同后，纳德拉为这一举动进行了辩护。他说：“我们做出了一个原则性的决定，我们不会拒绝向我们民主选举的机构提供技术，以保护我们享有的自由。”","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"MSFT":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":6263,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":191045748,"gmtCreate":1620830207184,"gmtModify":1704349069331,"author":{"id":"3536928846214760","authorId":"3536928846214760","name":"東海吉龍","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0ef8466588cf515f97a20c636e2be8a0","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3536928846214760","idStr":"3536928846214760"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"666","listText":"666","text":"666","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/191045748","repostId":"1123721888","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1123721888","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"为用户提供金融资讯、行情、数据，旨在帮助投资者理解世界，做投资决策。","home_visible":1,"media_name":"老虎资讯综合","id":"102","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1620812439,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1123721888?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-12 17:40","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Tiger Brokers has been included in the MSCI China All Equity Index!","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1123721888","media":"老虎资讯综合","summary":"此次被纳入MSCI意味着国际资本市场对老虎证券的认可和信心！","content":"<p>On May 11, MSCI, an international index provider, released its quarterly index adjustment results for May.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TIGR\">Tiger Brokers</a>It will be included in the MSCI China All Shares Index, effective after the market closes on May 27.</p><p>Tiger Brokers founder and CEO Wu Tianhua stated, \"Tiger Brokers' inclusion in the MSCI China All Equity Index represents international market recognition and confidence in our long-term investment value and development prospects. Tiger Brokers' mission is to make investing better through technology. Through continuous technological iteration, we are committed to providing investors with a more efficient, convenient, and smooth one-stop global investment experience.\" As Tiger enters countries and regions such as Singapore and the United States, we look forward to serving even more global users.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6cac618ec6413c15fd5aad09ee702621\" tg-width=\"405\" tg-height=\"720\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">MSCI is currently the world's most important index company, compiling hundreds of indices for various markets around the world, which are used as investment benchmarks and tracked by numerous international institutions and investors. Since launching its first index in 1969, MSCI has primarily provided products and services such as indices, risk portfolio and performance analysis tools, and corporate governance tools, tailored to different countries and regions, market sizes, industries, and investment methods. With approximately $10 trillion in global assets benchmarked against the MSCI index, 97 of the world's top 100 largest asset managers are MSCI clients. Pensions in the United States that hold 95% of their investment interests are benchmarked by MSCI.</p><p>The MSCI China All Shares Index, compiled by Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI), is the most important component of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. According to MSCI's index adjustment methodology, companies that can be included in its index system generally have to meet a series of requirements, including total market capitalization, free-float market capitalization, liquidity, and trading hours.</p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e8f2f148520e460cb20ee263c4b5fd2f\" tg-width=\"830\" tg-height=\"536\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>MSCI official website</span></p><p>Historical performance of the MSCI China All Shares Index:</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6c5df675372dbd49e16da8a583e0f650\" tg-width=\"830\" tg-height=\"426\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">According to MSCI's quarterly adjustment results, the MSCI China All Stock Index added 60 stocks and removed 26 stocks. So what does being on the list mean for Tiger?</p><p>This signifies that the international capital market's recognition and confidence in Tiger Brokers will help further expand the company's influence in the international capital market and enhance the internationalization level of its shareholders.</p><p>According to MSCI estimates, trillions of dollars worldwide track emerging market indices, including both active and passive funds, with passive funds investing in the MSCI China All Equity Index. Once stocks are included in the index, passive investors will allocate these newly added constituent stocks proportionally.</p><p>View details:</p><p><a href=\"https://www.msci.com/eqb/gimi/stdindex/MSCI_May21_ChinaAllShares_PublicList.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Explanation of Adjustments to MSCI China Index Constituents</a></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tiger Brokers has been included in the MSCI China All Equity Index!</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTiger Brokers has been included in the MSCI China All Equity Index!\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/102\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">老虎资讯综合 </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-05-12 17:40</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>On May 11, MSCI, an international index provider, released its quarterly index adjustment results for May.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TIGR\">Tiger Brokers</a>It will be included in the MSCI China All Shares Index, effective after the market closes on May 27.</p><p>Tiger Brokers founder and CEO Wu Tianhua stated, \"Tiger Brokers' inclusion in the MSCI China All Equity Index represents international market recognition and confidence in our long-term investment value and development prospects. Tiger Brokers' mission is to make investing better through technology. Through continuous technological iteration, we are committed to providing investors with a more efficient, convenient, and smooth one-stop global investment experience.\" As Tiger enters countries and regions such as Singapore and the United States, we look forward to serving even more global users.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6cac618ec6413c15fd5aad09ee702621\" tg-width=\"405\" tg-height=\"720\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">MSCI is currently the world's most important index company, compiling hundreds of indices for various markets around the world, which are used as investment benchmarks and tracked by numerous international institutions and investors. Since launching its first index in 1969, MSCI has primarily provided products and services such as indices, risk portfolio and performance analysis tools, and corporate governance tools, tailored to different countries and regions, market sizes, industries, and investment methods. With approximately $10 trillion in global assets benchmarked against the MSCI index, 97 of the world's top 100 largest asset managers are MSCI clients. Pensions in the United States that hold 95% of their investment interests are benchmarked by MSCI.</p><p>The MSCI China All Shares Index, compiled by Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI), is the most important component of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. According to MSCI's index adjustment methodology, companies that can be included in its index system generally have to meet a series of requirements, including total market capitalization, free-float market capitalization, liquidity, and trading hours.</p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e8f2f148520e460cb20ee263c4b5fd2f\" tg-width=\"830\" tg-height=\"536\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>MSCI official website</span></p><p>Historical performance of the MSCI China All Shares Index:</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6c5df675372dbd49e16da8a583e0f650\" tg-width=\"830\" tg-height=\"426\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">According to MSCI's quarterly adjustment results, the MSCI China All Stock Index added 60 stocks and removed 26 stocks. So what does being on the list mean for Tiger?</p><p>This signifies that the international capital market's recognition and confidence in Tiger Brokers will help further expand the company's influence in the international capital market and enhance the internationalization level of its shareholders.</p><p>According to MSCI estimates, trillions of dollars worldwide track emerging market indices, including both active and passive funds, with passive funds investing in the MSCI China All Equity Index. Once stocks are included in the index, passive investors will allocate these newly added constituent stocks proportionally.</p><p>View details:</p><p><a href=\"https://www.msci.com/eqb/gimi/stdindex/MSCI_May21_ChinaAllShares_PublicList.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Explanation of Adjustments to MSCI China Index Constituents</a></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9e4b807dafecc161ebbd0d3c42055f20","relate_stocks":{"TIGR":"老虎证券"},"is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1123721888","content_text":"5月11日消息，国际指数编制公司MSCI公布5月指数季度调整结果，其中，老虎证券获纳入MSCI中国全股票指数（MSCI China All Shares Index），将于5月27日收盘后生效。老虎证券创始人及CEO巫天华表示：“老虎证券获纳入MSCI中国全股票指数代表国际市场对我们长期投资价值和发展前景的认可和信心。老虎证券的使命是科技让投资更美好。通过不断技术迭代，我们致力于为投资者提供更高效、便捷、流畅的一站式全球投资体验。随着老虎进入新加坡，美国等国家和地区，我们期待服务更多全球用户。”MSCI（明晟）是目前全球最重要的指数公司，编制数百种全球各个市场的指数，被大量国际机构，投资者作为投资基准并跟踪。从 1969年发布第一只指数至今，MSCI按照国家和区域、市场规模大小、行业及投资方式的不同，主要提供指数、风险组合和业绩分析工具以及公司治理工具等产品和服务。全球约10万亿美元的资产以MSCI指数为基准，全球前100个最大资产管理者中，97个都是MSCI的客户。美国95%的投资权益的养老金以MSCI为基准。MSCI中国全股票指数(MSCI China All Shares Index)由摩根士丹利资本国际(MSCI)编制，是 MSCI新兴市场指数中最重要的组成部分。根据 MSCI指数的调整方法，能被纳入到其指数体系的公司一般要满足总市值、自由流通市值、流动性和交易时间等一系列要求。MSCI官网明晟中国全股票指数(MSCI China All Shares Index)历史表现：根据MSCI发布的季度调整结果， MSCI中国全股票指数本次新增60只个股，剔除26只股票。那么，上榜对于老虎意味着什么呢？意味着国际资本市场对老虎证券的认可和信心，有助于进一步扩大公司国际资本市场影响力、提升公司股东国际化水平。据 MSCI估算，全球数以万亿美元的资金跟踪新兴市场指数，其中既包含了主动型资金，又包含了被动型基金，被动型资金以明晟中国全股票指数作为投资标的。当股票被纳入指数后，被动型投资者会按比例配置新增这些成份股。详情查看：MSCI中国指数成分股调整说明","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TIGR":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":7404,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":108054251,"gmtCreate":1619966313173,"gmtModify":1704336841241,"author":{"id":"3536928846214760","authorId":"3536928846214760","name":"東海吉龍","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0ef8466588cf515f97a20c636e2be8a0","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3536928846214760","idStr":"3536928846214760"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"666","listText":"666","text":"666","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/108054251","repostId":"2132567538","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2132567538","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1619941518,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2132567538?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-02 15:45","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Was the US GDP relatively strong or weak in the first quarter?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2132567538","media":"智通财经网","summary":"本文来自“申万宏源宏观”。摘要一、周观点：美国一季度GDP究竟是偏强还是偏弱?21Q1美国GDP同比0.4%，略低于市场预期。美国21Q1  GDP实际同比0.4%，疫情以来首次同比转正，环比1.6%","content":"<p><b>This article is from \"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/000166\">Shenwan Hongyuan</a>\"Macroeconomic\".</b></p><p>Abstract</p><p><b>I. Weekly Viewpoint: Was the US Q1 GDP relatively strong or weak?</b></p><p><b>The US GDP grew by 0.4% year-on-year in Q1 2021, slightly lower than market expectations.</b>The US GDP grew 0.4% year-on-year in real terms in Q1 2021, turning positive year-on-year for the first time since the pandemic, and 1.6% month-on-month. The main contributing factors were goods consumption, service consumption, and non-residential investment, demonstrating the rapid recovery of the US economy under the improvement of the pandemic and fiscal subsidies. However, the main drags were changes in private inventories and imports. In fact, the US GDP growth rate in the first quarter was slightly lower than market expectations, indicating insufficient market awareness of the slow recovery of production caused by excessive fiscal subsidies in the US, as well as overly optimistic expectations for the improvement of the pandemic.</p><p><b>Consumer spending: Subsidies boost commodity consumption, and the pandemic eases the recovery of the service sector.</b>1) In Q1 2021, U.S. personal consumption expenditures contributed 1.1 percentage points to GDP year-on-year, a significant improvement of 3 percentage points compared to Q4 2020. Commodity consumption is mainly driven by durable goods, while service consumption has a greater impact on GDP growth than durable goods consumption. 2) From a monthly high-frequency perspective, PCE in March was 8.5% year-on-year and 3.7% month-on-month, strengthening again after a slight decline during the direct subsidy vacuum in February. This demonstrates the immediate stimulating effect of the $1,400 subsidy in March on consumption, as well as the recovery of service consumption after the relaxation of prevention and control measures. However, in terms of the strength of the recovery in service consumption, it was actually slightly weaker than the overly optimistic expectations of overseas markets in February and March.</p><p><b>Investment: Equipment investment improved significantly, interest rates suppressed real estate investment, and inventory replenishment did not occur.</b>In Q1 2021, domestic private investment contributed 0.8 percentage points to GDP year-on-year, a slight improvement of 0.1 percentage points compared to the fourth quarter. 1) Improved non-residential investment indicates that the U.S. manufacturing sector's expectations for the economic outlook have improved; 2) The decline in the year-on-year contribution of private inventory changes to GDP in Q1 2021 reflects the supply-demand gap in the US economy. Strong demand but slow production recovery lead to a decline in inventories. This means that the strength of commodity prices in Q1 cannot be supported by the logic of strong US industrial production and proactive inventory replenishment. 3) The year-on-year contribution of residential investment to GDP remained basically stable, while the month-on-month growth rate was suppressed by the overall rise in US interest rates in the previous period. It is expected to continue to cool down as interest rates rise in the medium term.</p><p><b>Government spending and net exports: Subsidies have driven up government spending, while the widening supply-demand gap has led to high import growth.</b>The supply-demand gap in the US economy has further deepened the drag on GDP from net exports. In Q1 2021, net exports dragged down GDP by 2 percentage points year-on-year, an increase of 0.7 percentage points compared to Q4 2020. Government spending contributed 0.1 percentage points to GDP year-on-year in Q1 2021, mainly due to the U.S. government's direct subsidy checks to the banking system for residents and the cost of purchasing vaccines.</p><p><b>The US economic recovery is expected to peak in the second quarter, and attention should be paid to the subsequent developments of the pandemic.</b>We believe the strength of the future U.S. economic recovery will depend on the vaccination process and the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic. Assuming that the US pandemic continues to ease and the service sector gradually recovers, the second quarter is expected to be the peak of the US economic recovery. However, the supply-demand gap caused by excessive subsidies will continue until September, and the strength of the US economic recovery this year may not be as strong as the market expects. Personal consumption expenditures: The first quarter is expected to be the peak of goods consumption, and service sector consumption will continue to gradually recover as the pandemic eases. However, the spread of more contagious virus variants in the United States and overseas countries will also affect the strength of the subsequent service sector recovery. Investment: The improvement of non-residential investment requires attention to the subsequent progress of the pandemic. Residential investment will decline as the real estate market gradually cools down; Changes in private inventories may not improve until unemployment benefits end in September. Government spending and net exports: Government spending is expected to continue to make a positive year-on-year contribution to GDP until the fourth quarter. Net exports will return to normal levels as the supply-demand gap narrows later this year.</p><p><b>II. Global Macro Data</b></p><p><b>This week's high-frequency data</b>New orders for U.S. durable goods rose both year-on-year and month-on-month.</p><p><b>epidemic</b>The number of new confirmed cases in the United States has decreased.</p><p><b>Demand</b>Retail sales in Japan rebounded significantly year-on-year.</p><p><b>Supply and Employment</b>New orders for durable goods in the United States rose both year-on-year and month-on-month.</p><p><b>Trade</b>U.S. imports and exports both rose significantly year-on-year in March.</p><p><b>Inflation and commodities</b>Oil prices rose slightly.</p><p><b>Real Estate</b>The U.S. existing home sales index rose in March.</p><p><b>Monetary policy and exchange rates</b>the US Dollar Index fell, while gold prices remained stable.</p><p><b>Global Macro Calendar</b>Focus on the US ISM Manufacturing PMI</p><p>text</p><p><b>I. Weekly Viewpoint: Was the US Q1 GDP relatively strong or weak?</b></p><p><b>US GDP grew 0.4% year-on-year in Q1, slightly lower than market expectations.</b></p><p>The US GDP grew by 0.4% year-on-year in real terms in Q1 2021, turning positive year-on-year for the first time since the pandemic, and by 1.6% month-on-month. The main contributing factors were goods consumption, service consumption, and non-residential investment, demonstrating the relatively rapid recovery of the US economy under the improvement of the pandemic and fiscal subsidies. The main drags were changes in private inventories and imports. In fact, the US GDP growth rate in the first quarter was slightly lower than market expectations, indicating insufficient market awareness of the slow production recovery caused by excessive fiscal subsidies in the US, as well as overly optimistic expectations for the improvement of the pandemic.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/867b3b31bf5a4410ca85884cf283ce1f.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"588\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>2. Consumer spending: Subsidies boost commodity consumption, and the pandemic eases the recovery of the service sector.</b></p><p>In Q1 2021, government subsidies of up to $2,000 per person boosted consumer spending; The easing of the pandemic has driven the recovery of service consumption, but it is slightly weaker than the initial optimistic expectations of overseas markets. 1) From a quarterly perspective, US personal consumption expenditures contributed 1.1 percentage points to GDP year-on-year in Q1 2021, a significant improvement of 3 percentage points compared to Q4 2020. It jumped from being the biggest drag on GDP in Q4 to the biggest contributor, showing that the first quarter had the stimulating effect of both the $600 subsidy in January and the $1,400 subsidy that began to be distributed in March on consumption, as well as the gradual release of service consumption under the easing of the epidemic. 2) From a monthly high-frequency perspective, PCE reached 8.5% year-on-year and 3.7% month-on-month in March, strengthening again after a slight decline during the direct subsidy vacuum in February. Among them, the year-on-year growth rates of durable goods and service consumption increased again, reaching 43.3% and 4.8% respectively in March, while the year-on-year growth rate of non-durable goods slowed slightly (4.3%), indicating that the US$1,400 subsidy in March had an immediate stimulating effect on consumption, as well as the recovery of service consumption under the relaxation of prevention and control measures. However, in terms of the strength of the recovery in service consumption, it was actually slightly weaker than the overly optimistic expectations of overseas markets in February and March.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/fb6a3cdada866cc05b11f3b44abb7b40.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"398\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Consumption of goods and services jointly drove high growth in personal consumption expenditure. 1) Commodity consumption is mainly driven by durable goods. In Q1 2021, commodity consumption contributed 3.2 percentage points to GDP, an improvement of 1.5 percentage points compared to Q4 2020. This was mainly due to the renewed high growth of durable goods under fiscal stimulus in the first quarter. In Q1 2021, the contribution of durable goods to GDP improved significantly by 1.3 percentage points compared to Q4, while the contribution of non-durable goods to GDP improved only slightly by 0.3 percentage points. 2) Service consumption has a greater impact on GDP growth than durable goods consumption. Although service consumption still had a negative contribution of -1.4% to GDP in Q1 2021, it improved significantly by 1.6 percentage points compared to the previous quarter. The improvement was greater than that of durable goods consumption, demonstrating that service consumption has greater resilience in improving under the dual factors of fiscal subsidies and easing of the pandemic.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/e8b1b37f95a3c799e28a194bc63e56e7.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"399\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>3. Investment: Equipment investment improved significantly, interest rates suppressed real estate investment, and inventory replenishment did not occur.</b></p><p>The impact of non-residential investment on GDP growth has improved significantly, while private inventory has become a drag. In Q1 2021, domestic private investment contributed 0.8 percentage points to GDP year-on-year, a slight improvement of 0.1 percentage points compared to the fourth quarter.</p><p>1) Improved non-residential investment indicates that the U.S. manufacturing sector has improved its expectations for the economic outlook. The main contributor to the improvement in private investment was non-residential investment (an improvement of 0.6 percentage points), mainly from equipment investment, indicating that manufacturing companies remain optimistic about the prospects for economic recovery.</p><p>2) The decline in the year-on-year contribution of private inventory changes to GDP in Q1 2021 reflects the gap between supply and demand in the US economy. Strong demand but slow production recovery lead to a decline in inventory. This means that the strengthening of commodity prices in Q1 cannot be supported by the logic of strong US industrial production and proactive inventory replenishment. The main factor dragging down private investment was changes in private inventories (a drag of 0.4 percentage points).</p><p>3) The year-on-year contribution of residential investment to GDP remained basically stable, while the month-on-month growth rate was suppressed by the overall rise in US interest rates in the previous period. It is expected to continue to cool down as interest rates rise in the medium term. In Q1 2021, residential investment's contribution to GDP remained stable. However, with the gradual rise in mortgage rates since 2021, the US real estate market has cooled down, and residential construction spending and existing home sales have slowed down. It is expected that the contribution of residential investment to GDP will gradually decline in the future.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/8831f8bd60fdfc9671df61b6e741faaa.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"393\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>4. Government spending and net exports: Subsidies drove up government spending, while the widening supply-demand gap led to high import growth.</b></p><p>The supply-demand gap in the US economy has further deepened the drag on GDP from net exports. In Q1 2021, net exports dragged down GDP by 2 percentage points year-on-year, an increase of 0.7 percentage points compared to Q4 2020. 1) Exports dragged down by 1 percentage point, but improved by 0.2 percentage points compared to the previous quarter, indicating a slight recovery in US industrial production. However, this still pales in comparison to the 3.0 percentage point improvement in personal consumption expenditures. In reality, it reflects the widening supply-demand gap in Q1 2021 due to excessive US fiscal subsidies. 2) Imports dragged down GDP by 1.0 percentage points year-on-year in Q1 2021, a significant increase of 0.9 percentage points compared to the previous quarter. The direct consequence of the widening supply and demand gap in the United States is the expansion of imports.</p><p>Government spending contributed 0.1 percentage points to GDP year-on-year in Q1 2021, mainly due to the U.S. government's direct subsidy checks to the banking system for residents and the cost of purchasing vaccines.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/1e6d4ceb162a00ae93de51b3cf6bb71b.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"386\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>5. The US economic recovery is expected to peak in the second quarter; attention should be paid to the subsequent developments of the pandemic.</b></p><p>Looking ahead, we believe the strength of the future U.S. economic recovery will depend on the vaccination progress and the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic. Assuming that the US pandemic continues to ease and the service sector gradually recovers, the second quarter is expected to be the peak of the US economic recovery. However, the supply-demand gap caused by excessive subsidies will continue until September, and the strength of the US economic recovery this year may not be as strong as the market expects.</p><p>Personal consumption expenditures: 1) Although goods consumption showed extremely strong momentum in Q1 2021, we expect the first quarter to be the peak of goods consumption, and it will gradually decline as subsidies subside; 2) Service sector consumption will continue to gradually recover as the pandemic eases, but the global pandemic has rebounded since March, especially in European countries and emerging countries. At the same time, the spread of more contagious virus variants in the United States and overseas countries will also affect the intensity of the subsequent recovery of the service sector.</p><p>Investment: 1) The main driver of the improvement in non-residential investment in Q1 2021 was positive economic expectations. From the current perspective, the global pandemic is the core factor determining the strength of economic recovery, and the subsequent progress of the pandemic needs to be monitored. 2) Residential investment will decline as the real estate market gradually cools down; 3) Changes in private inventory, i.e., the intensity of inventory replenishment, will depend on whether the current supply-demand gap in the United States can be alleviated. From the current perspective, it may not be until after unemployment benefits end in September that a significant trend of bridging between the supply and demand sides of the United States can emerge, thereby driving inventory investment.</p><p>Government spending and net exports: 1) With the continued payment of unemployment benefits in the second and third quarters, government spending is expected to continue to make a positive year-on-year contribution to GDP until the fourth quarter. If the US jobs program or the US family program can be implemented within the year, it will also boost government spending levels; In terms of net exports, exports will depend on the progress of the recovery of US industrial production, which, as mentioned above, may not be boosted until the fourth quarter, while imports, on the contrary, will fall back to normal levels as the supply-demand gap narrows later this year.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/32e1b124c2e79173310a2a69f29f1ee7.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"547\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>II. Global macro data: New confirmed cases in the United States decline</b></p><p><b>1. Epidemic: New confirmed cases in the United States decline</b></p><p>New confirmed cases in the United States declined this week. The average number of new confirmed cases in the United States dropped to more than 53,000 over the past seven days. As of April 29, the cumulative number of confirmed cases of COVID-19 worldwide exceeded 150 million, the cumulative number of deaths reached 3.14 million, and the cumulative number of recoveries reached 120 million. Over the four days of this week (April 27-April 30), the United States and the United Kingdom reported 220,000 and 9,000 new confirmed cases, respectively.</p><p>As of April 28, Israel had the highest average number of COVID-19 vaccines per 100 people globally, at 121.1 doses per 100 people, followed by the United States at 70.2 doses per 100 people and the United Kingdom at 70.9 doses per 100 people. As of April 28, Israel had the highest proportion of fully vaccinated people globally, at 58.7%, followed by the United States and the United Kingdom at 29.3% and 20.7%, respectively.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/887a942234cb8fe459a2f83e1d51371f.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"591\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/62573bfd15fa133a1b4a5d4e236f878d.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"397\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>2. Demand: Japanese retail sales rebounded significantly year-on-year.</b></p><p>Both retail and wholesale sales in Japan saw significant year-on-year growth. Japan's retail sales index rose 5.3% year-on-year in March, with textiles and apparel retailing at 15.8% year-on-year and wholesale sales at 1.0% year-on-year in March.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/a115423dbfa92a2b68fd1ddba7b7202c.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"432\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>South Korea's retail sales continued to grow year-on-year in March, and consumption of semi-durable goods increased significantly. South Korea's retail sales rose 3.5 percentage points to 13.5% year-on-year in March, with semi-durable goods consumption growing the fastest at 35.5% year-on-year. Durable goods increased by 13.6% year-on-year, while non-durable goods increased by 6.5% year-on-year.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/660433692ab7c356ac6e92af5532c956.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"549\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>3. Supply and Employment: New orders for U.S. durable goods rose both year-on-year and month-on-month.</b></p><p>U.S. durable goods inventories rose, and new order growth both increased month-on-month. U.S. durable goods inventories reached $431.84 billion in March, up 1.0% month-over-month and 1.7% year-over-year. New orders for durable goods in the United States rose 0.5% month-on-month in March and a sharp increase of 25% year-on-year.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/00d167c28987b587b0353bdb22cabcb3.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"397\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Japan's unemployment rate fell to 2.6% in March. Japan's unemployment rate fell 0.3 percentage points to 2.6% in March from the previous month. South Korea's industrial production index rose both year-on-year and month-on-month, indicating a continued recovery in industry. South Korea's industrial production index rose 5.7% year-on-year and 0.8% month-on-month to 112.6 in March.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/3e518f69ea70eb9423bd2c4c0800a9d4.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"393\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>U.S. industrial materials production continues to rise. 1) In the week ending April 24, U.S. weekly crude steel production rose 43.6% year-on-year, and capacity utilization increased slightly by 0.4 percentage points from the previous week to 78.4%; 2) As of April 23, the operational capacity utilization rate of U.S. refineries rose by 0.4 percentage points to 85.4%.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/08378049f4011957a1ca13a61b5f7ee9.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"395\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>The number of initial jobless claims in the United States fell slightly that week, while the number of continuing jobless claims rose slightly. In the week ending April 24, initial jobless claims in the United States reached 553,000, a decrease of 13,000 from the previous week; The number of people continuing to claim unemployment benefits reached 3.66 million in the week ending April 17, an increase of 9,000 from the previous week.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/50abaebb23322c65845134f36edf2eac.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"550\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>4. Trade: US imports and exports both rose significantly year-on-year in March.</b></p><p>U.S. imports and exports both rose significantly year-on-year in March. U.S. exports rose sharply by 16.5 percentage points to 11.5% in March from the previous month, while imports rose by 20.6% year-on-year. The U.S. merchandise trade balance was -$90.59 billion in March.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/b94fcaf0b73f26e0f7e86a9f8b746b80.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"549\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>5. Inflation and commodities: Oil prices rose slightly.</b></p><p>EIA crude oil inventories rose by 9 million barrels in the week ending April 28, while U.S. crude oil production fell slightly by 100,000 barrels per day to 10.9 million barrels per day. As of April 29, the weekly average price of WTI crude oil rose to $63.2 per barrel; The weekly average price of Brent crude rose to $66.6 per barrel.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/2ea9504a69c4ccccc0e74ff1a56da96e.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"396\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/e2a42a869453a51bf63a352119f75e6a.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"402\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>6. Real Estate: The US existing home sales index rose year-on-year in March.</b></p><p>The U.S. S&P/CS home price index rose for the eighth consecutive month in February. The U.S. S&P/CS home price index rose 11.9% year-over-year to 246.0 in February, marking its eighth consecutive month of gains. The U.S. existing home sales index rose sharply by 23.3% year-on-year and 1.9% month-on-month in March.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/6ac3751240b8a02c34f4c66d93fb255b.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"398\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>New home starts and construction orders in Japan rose sharply in March. New home starts in Japan in March rose 1.5% year-on-year and 18.1% month-on-month, while construction orders in March rose 12.5% year-on-year and 192.7% month-on-month, the highest increase in nearly a year.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/e961519800be12d5e185f10acff56a58.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"392\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>U.S. 5-year mortgage rates fell, while 15-year and 30-year mortgage rates rose. In the week ending April 29, the 5-year mortgage rate fell 0.2 percentage points to 2.6%, while the 15-year and 30-year mortgage rates rose to 2.3% and 3.0%, respectively. In the week ending April 23, the U.S. MBA market index fell 18.2 to 706.6, indicating a slight cooling of housing market activity.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/2eb2b206b830b79a11aed2265d986bec.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"395\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>7. Monetary policy and exchange rates: the US Dollar Index fell, while gold prices remained basically stable.</b></p><p>This week, the Federal Reserve held its interest rate meeting, Powell's speech was dovish, the US Dollar Index fell, and gold prices remained basically stable. On April 28 local time, the Federal Reserve released its interest rate meeting statement. At the post-meeting press conference, Powell said that it would take some time to see substantial progress, and that the current scale of asset purchases would be maintained before that. It was not yet time to discuss Taper, and the US Dollar Index continued to decline. As of April 29, the the US Dollar Index closed at 90.6140, down 0.7% from the previous week; The euro and the pound sterling closed at 1.2129 and 1.3906 against the dollar respectively (pound sterling exchange rate data as of the 28th), appreciating 0.7% and depreciating 0.2% respectively from last week; The Canadian dollar strengthened, closing at 1.2292, up 1.7% from last week, as the Bank of Canada took the lead in tapering. The average weekly price of gold in London this week was $1,774.8 per ounce, basically stable from last week, with a year-on-year increase of 1.2 percentage points to 3.6%.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/c2e4e8d549f84a56f7d651806cc3a657.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"398\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/09b461fbeb60aed3abf2e7ffd691b486.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"551\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>","source":"highlight_zhitongcaijin","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Was the US GDP relatively strong or weak in the first quarter?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWas the US GDP relatively strong or weak in the first quarter?\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">智通财经网</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-05-02 15:45</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>This article is from \"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/000166\">Shenwan Hongyuan</a>\"Macroeconomic\".</b></p><p>Abstract</p><p><b>I. Weekly Viewpoint: Was the US Q1 GDP relatively strong or weak?</b></p><p><b>The US GDP grew by 0.4% year-on-year in Q1 2021, slightly lower than market expectations.</b>The US GDP grew 0.4% year-on-year in real terms in Q1 2021, turning positive year-on-year for the first time since the pandemic, and 1.6% month-on-month. The main contributing factors were goods consumption, service consumption, and non-residential investment, demonstrating the rapid recovery of the US economy under the improvement of the pandemic and fiscal subsidies. However, the main drags were changes in private inventories and imports. In fact, the US GDP growth rate in the first quarter was slightly lower than market expectations, indicating insufficient market awareness of the slow recovery of production caused by excessive fiscal subsidies in the US, as well as overly optimistic expectations for the improvement of the pandemic.</p><p><b>Consumer spending: Subsidies boost commodity consumption, and the pandemic eases the recovery of the service sector.</b>1) In Q1 2021, U.S. personal consumption expenditures contributed 1.1 percentage points to GDP year-on-year, a significant improvement of 3 percentage points compared to Q4 2020. Commodity consumption is mainly driven by durable goods, while service consumption has a greater impact on GDP growth than durable goods consumption. 2) From a monthly high-frequency perspective, PCE in March was 8.5% year-on-year and 3.7% month-on-month, strengthening again after a slight decline during the direct subsidy vacuum in February. This demonstrates the immediate stimulating effect of the $1,400 subsidy in March on consumption, as well as the recovery of service consumption after the relaxation of prevention and control measures. However, in terms of the strength of the recovery in service consumption, it was actually slightly weaker than the overly optimistic expectations of overseas markets in February and March.</p><p><b>Investment: Equipment investment improved significantly, interest rates suppressed real estate investment, and inventory replenishment did not occur.</b>In Q1 2021, domestic private investment contributed 0.8 percentage points to GDP year-on-year, a slight improvement of 0.1 percentage points compared to the fourth quarter. 1) Improved non-residential investment indicates that the U.S. manufacturing sector's expectations for the economic outlook have improved; 2) The decline in the year-on-year contribution of private inventory changes to GDP in Q1 2021 reflects the supply-demand gap in the US economy. Strong demand but slow production recovery lead to a decline in inventories. This means that the strength of commodity prices in Q1 cannot be supported by the logic of strong US industrial production and proactive inventory replenishment. 3) The year-on-year contribution of residential investment to GDP remained basically stable, while the month-on-month growth rate was suppressed by the overall rise in US interest rates in the previous period. It is expected to continue to cool down as interest rates rise in the medium term.</p><p><b>Government spending and net exports: Subsidies have driven up government spending, while the widening supply-demand gap has led to high import growth.</b>The supply-demand gap in the US economy has further deepened the drag on GDP from net exports. In Q1 2021, net exports dragged down GDP by 2 percentage points year-on-year, an increase of 0.7 percentage points compared to Q4 2020. Government spending contributed 0.1 percentage points to GDP year-on-year in Q1 2021, mainly due to the U.S. government's direct subsidy checks to the banking system for residents and the cost of purchasing vaccines.</p><p><b>The US economic recovery is expected to peak in the second quarter, and attention should be paid to the subsequent developments of the pandemic.</b>We believe the strength of the future U.S. economic recovery will depend on the vaccination process and the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic. Assuming that the US pandemic continues to ease and the service sector gradually recovers, the second quarter is expected to be the peak of the US economic recovery. However, the supply-demand gap caused by excessive subsidies will continue until September, and the strength of the US economic recovery this year may not be as strong as the market expects. Personal consumption expenditures: The first quarter is expected to be the peak of goods consumption, and service sector consumption will continue to gradually recover as the pandemic eases. However, the spread of more contagious virus variants in the United States and overseas countries will also affect the strength of the subsequent service sector recovery. Investment: The improvement of non-residential investment requires attention to the subsequent progress of the pandemic. Residential investment will decline as the real estate market gradually cools down; Changes in private inventories may not improve until unemployment benefits end in September. Government spending and net exports: Government spending is expected to continue to make a positive year-on-year contribution to GDP until the fourth quarter. Net exports will return to normal levels as the supply-demand gap narrows later this year.</p><p><b>II. Global Macro Data</b></p><p><b>This week's high-frequency data</b>New orders for U.S. durable goods rose both year-on-year and month-on-month.</p><p><b>epidemic</b>The number of new confirmed cases in the United States has decreased.</p><p><b>Demand</b>Retail sales in Japan rebounded significantly year-on-year.</p><p><b>Supply and Employment</b>New orders for durable goods in the United States rose both year-on-year and month-on-month.</p><p><b>Trade</b>U.S. imports and exports both rose significantly year-on-year in March.</p><p><b>Inflation and commodities</b>Oil prices rose slightly.</p><p><b>Real Estate</b>The U.S. existing home sales index rose in March.</p><p><b>Monetary policy and exchange rates</b>the US Dollar Index fell, while gold prices remained stable.</p><p><b>Global Macro Calendar</b>Focus on the US ISM Manufacturing PMI</p><p>text</p><p><b>I. Weekly Viewpoint: Was the US Q1 GDP relatively strong or weak?</b></p><p><b>US GDP grew 0.4% year-on-year in Q1, slightly lower than market expectations.</b></p><p>The US GDP grew by 0.4% year-on-year in real terms in Q1 2021, turning positive year-on-year for the first time since the pandemic, and by 1.6% month-on-month. The main contributing factors were goods consumption, service consumption, and non-residential investment, demonstrating the relatively rapid recovery of the US economy under the improvement of the pandemic and fiscal subsidies. The main drags were changes in private inventories and imports. In fact, the US GDP growth rate in the first quarter was slightly lower than market expectations, indicating insufficient market awareness of the slow production recovery caused by excessive fiscal subsidies in the US, as well as overly optimistic expectations for the improvement of the pandemic.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/867b3b31bf5a4410ca85884cf283ce1f.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"588\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>2. Consumer spending: Subsidies boost commodity consumption, and the pandemic eases the recovery of the service sector.</b></p><p>In Q1 2021, government subsidies of up to $2,000 per person boosted consumer spending; The easing of the pandemic has driven the recovery of service consumption, but it is slightly weaker than the initial optimistic expectations of overseas markets. 1) From a quarterly perspective, US personal consumption expenditures contributed 1.1 percentage points to GDP year-on-year in Q1 2021, a significant improvement of 3 percentage points compared to Q4 2020. It jumped from being the biggest drag on GDP in Q4 to the biggest contributor, showing that the first quarter had the stimulating effect of both the $600 subsidy in January and the $1,400 subsidy that began to be distributed in March on consumption, as well as the gradual release of service consumption under the easing of the epidemic. 2) From a monthly high-frequency perspective, PCE reached 8.5% year-on-year and 3.7% month-on-month in March, strengthening again after a slight decline during the direct subsidy vacuum in February. Among them, the year-on-year growth rates of durable goods and service consumption increased again, reaching 43.3% and 4.8% respectively in March, while the year-on-year growth rate of non-durable goods slowed slightly (4.3%), indicating that the US$1,400 subsidy in March had an immediate stimulating effect on consumption, as well as the recovery of service consumption under the relaxation of prevention and control measures. However, in terms of the strength of the recovery in service consumption, it was actually slightly weaker than the overly optimistic expectations of overseas markets in February and March.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/fb6a3cdada866cc05b11f3b44abb7b40.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"398\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Consumption of goods and services jointly drove high growth in personal consumption expenditure. 1) Commodity consumption is mainly driven by durable goods. In Q1 2021, commodity consumption contributed 3.2 percentage points to GDP, an improvement of 1.5 percentage points compared to Q4 2020. This was mainly due to the renewed high growth of durable goods under fiscal stimulus in the first quarter. In Q1 2021, the contribution of durable goods to GDP improved significantly by 1.3 percentage points compared to Q4, while the contribution of non-durable goods to GDP improved only slightly by 0.3 percentage points. 2) Service consumption has a greater impact on GDP growth than durable goods consumption. Although service consumption still had a negative contribution of -1.4% to GDP in Q1 2021, it improved significantly by 1.6 percentage points compared to the previous quarter. The improvement was greater than that of durable goods consumption, demonstrating that service consumption has greater resilience in improving under the dual factors of fiscal subsidies and easing of the pandemic.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/e8b1b37f95a3c799e28a194bc63e56e7.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"399\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>3. Investment: Equipment investment improved significantly, interest rates suppressed real estate investment, and inventory replenishment did not occur.</b></p><p>The impact of non-residential investment on GDP growth has improved significantly, while private inventory has become a drag. In Q1 2021, domestic private investment contributed 0.8 percentage points to GDP year-on-year, a slight improvement of 0.1 percentage points compared to the fourth quarter.</p><p>1) Improved non-residential investment indicates that the U.S. manufacturing sector has improved its expectations for the economic outlook. The main contributor to the improvement in private investment was non-residential investment (an improvement of 0.6 percentage points), mainly from equipment investment, indicating that manufacturing companies remain optimistic about the prospects for economic recovery.</p><p>2) The decline in the year-on-year contribution of private inventory changes to GDP in Q1 2021 reflects the gap between supply and demand in the US economy. Strong demand but slow production recovery lead to a decline in inventory. This means that the strengthening of commodity prices in Q1 cannot be supported by the logic of strong US industrial production and proactive inventory replenishment. The main factor dragging down private investment was changes in private inventories (a drag of 0.4 percentage points).</p><p>3) The year-on-year contribution of residential investment to GDP remained basically stable, while the month-on-month growth rate was suppressed by the overall rise in US interest rates in the previous period. It is expected to continue to cool down as interest rates rise in the medium term. In Q1 2021, residential investment's contribution to GDP remained stable. However, with the gradual rise in mortgage rates since 2021, the US real estate market has cooled down, and residential construction spending and existing home sales have slowed down. It is expected that the contribution of residential investment to GDP will gradually decline in the future.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/8831f8bd60fdfc9671df61b6e741faaa.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"393\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>4. Government spending and net exports: Subsidies drove up government spending, while the widening supply-demand gap led to high import growth.</b></p><p>The supply-demand gap in the US economy has further deepened the drag on GDP from net exports. In Q1 2021, net exports dragged down GDP by 2 percentage points year-on-year, an increase of 0.7 percentage points compared to Q4 2020. 1) Exports dragged down by 1 percentage point, but improved by 0.2 percentage points compared to the previous quarter, indicating a slight recovery in US industrial production. However, this still pales in comparison to the 3.0 percentage point improvement in personal consumption expenditures. In reality, it reflects the widening supply-demand gap in Q1 2021 due to excessive US fiscal subsidies. 2) Imports dragged down GDP by 1.0 percentage points year-on-year in Q1 2021, a significant increase of 0.9 percentage points compared to the previous quarter. The direct consequence of the widening supply and demand gap in the United States is the expansion of imports.</p><p>Government spending contributed 0.1 percentage points to GDP year-on-year in Q1 2021, mainly due to the U.S. government's direct subsidy checks to the banking system for residents and the cost of purchasing vaccines.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/1e6d4ceb162a00ae93de51b3cf6bb71b.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"386\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>5. The US economic recovery is expected to peak in the second quarter; attention should be paid to the subsequent developments of the pandemic.</b></p><p>Looking ahead, we believe the strength of the future U.S. economic recovery will depend on the vaccination progress and the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic. Assuming that the US pandemic continues to ease and the service sector gradually recovers, the second quarter is expected to be the peak of the US economic recovery. However, the supply-demand gap caused by excessive subsidies will continue until September, and the strength of the US economic recovery this year may not be as strong as the market expects.</p><p>Personal consumption expenditures: 1) Although goods consumption showed extremely strong momentum in Q1 2021, we expect the first quarter to be the peak of goods consumption, and it will gradually decline as subsidies subside; 2) Service sector consumption will continue to gradually recover as the pandemic eases, but the global pandemic has rebounded since March, especially in European countries and emerging countries. At the same time, the spread of more contagious virus variants in the United States and overseas countries will also affect the intensity of the subsequent recovery of the service sector.</p><p>Investment: 1) The main driver of the improvement in non-residential investment in Q1 2021 was positive economic expectations. From the current perspective, the global pandemic is the core factor determining the strength of economic recovery, and the subsequent progress of the pandemic needs to be monitored. 2) Residential investment will decline as the real estate market gradually cools down; 3) Changes in private inventory, i.e., the intensity of inventory replenishment, will depend on whether the current supply-demand gap in the United States can be alleviated. From the current perspective, it may not be until after unemployment benefits end in September that a significant trend of bridging between the supply and demand sides of the United States can emerge, thereby driving inventory investment.</p><p>Government spending and net exports: 1) With the continued payment of unemployment benefits in the second and third quarters, government spending is expected to continue to make a positive year-on-year contribution to GDP until the fourth quarter. If the US jobs program or the US family program can be implemented within the year, it will also boost government spending levels; In terms of net exports, exports will depend on the progress of the recovery of US industrial production, which, as mentioned above, may not be boosted until the fourth quarter, while imports, on the contrary, will fall back to normal levels as the supply-demand gap narrows later this year.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/32e1b124c2e79173310a2a69f29f1ee7.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"547\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>II. Global macro data: New confirmed cases in the United States decline</b></p><p><b>1. Epidemic: New confirmed cases in the United States decline</b></p><p>New confirmed cases in the United States declined this week. The average number of new confirmed cases in the United States dropped to more than 53,000 over the past seven days. As of April 29, the cumulative number of confirmed cases of COVID-19 worldwide exceeded 150 million, the cumulative number of deaths reached 3.14 million, and the cumulative number of recoveries reached 120 million. Over the four days of this week (April 27-April 30), the United States and the United Kingdom reported 220,000 and 9,000 new confirmed cases, respectively.</p><p>As of April 28, Israel had the highest average number of COVID-19 vaccines per 100 people globally, at 121.1 doses per 100 people, followed by the United States at 70.2 doses per 100 people and the United Kingdom at 70.9 doses per 100 people. As of April 28, Israel had the highest proportion of fully vaccinated people globally, at 58.7%, followed by the United States and the United Kingdom at 29.3% and 20.7%, respectively.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/887a942234cb8fe459a2f83e1d51371f.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"591\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/62573bfd15fa133a1b4a5d4e236f878d.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"397\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>2. Demand: Japanese retail sales rebounded significantly year-on-year.</b></p><p>Both retail and wholesale sales in Japan saw significant year-on-year growth. Japan's retail sales index rose 5.3% year-on-year in March, with textiles and apparel retailing at 15.8% year-on-year and wholesale sales at 1.0% year-on-year in March.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/a115423dbfa92a2b68fd1ddba7b7202c.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"432\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>South Korea's retail sales continued to grow year-on-year in March, and consumption of semi-durable goods increased significantly. South Korea's retail sales rose 3.5 percentage points to 13.5% year-on-year in March, with semi-durable goods consumption growing the fastest at 35.5% year-on-year. Durable goods increased by 13.6% year-on-year, while non-durable goods increased by 6.5% year-on-year.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/660433692ab7c356ac6e92af5532c956.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"549\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>3. Supply and Employment: New orders for U.S. durable goods rose both year-on-year and month-on-month.</b></p><p>U.S. durable goods inventories rose, and new order growth both increased month-on-month. U.S. durable goods inventories reached $431.84 billion in March, up 1.0% month-over-month and 1.7% year-over-year. New orders for durable goods in the United States rose 0.5% month-on-month in March and a sharp increase of 25% year-on-year.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/00d167c28987b587b0353bdb22cabcb3.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"397\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Japan's unemployment rate fell to 2.6% in March. Japan's unemployment rate fell 0.3 percentage points to 2.6% in March from the previous month. South Korea's industrial production index rose both year-on-year and month-on-month, indicating a continued recovery in industry. South Korea's industrial production index rose 5.7% year-on-year and 0.8% month-on-month to 112.6 in March.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/3e518f69ea70eb9423bd2c4c0800a9d4.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"393\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>U.S. industrial materials production continues to rise. 1) In the week ending April 24, U.S. weekly crude steel production rose 43.6% year-on-year, and capacity utilization increased slightly by 0.4 percentage points from the previous week to 78.4%; 2) As of April 23, the operational capacity utilization rate of U.S. refineries rose by 0.4 percentage points to 85.4%.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/08378049f4011957a1ca13a61b5f7ee9.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"395\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>The number of initial jobless claims in the United States fell slightly that week, while the number of continuing jobless claims rose slightly. In the week ending April 24, initial jobless claims in the United States reached 553,000, a decrease of 13,000 from the previous week; The number of people continuing to claim unemployment benefits reached 3.66 million in the week ending April 17, an increase of 9,000 from the previous week.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/50abaebb23322c65845134f36edf2eac.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"550\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>4. Trade: US imports and exports both rose significantly year-on-year in March.</b></p><p>U.S. imports and exports both rose significantly year-on-year in March. U.S. exports rose sharply by 16.5 percentage points to 11.5% in March from the previous month, while imports rose by 20.6% year-on-year. The U.S. merchandise trade balance was -$90.59 billion in March.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/b94fcaf0b73f26e0f7e86a9f8b746b80.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"549\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>5. Inflation and commodities: Oil prices rose slightly.</b></p><p>EIA crude oil inventories rose by 9 million barrels in the week ending April 28, while U.S. crude oil production fell slightly by 100,000 barrels per day to 10.9 million barrels per day. As of April 29, the weekly average price of WTI crude oil rose to $63.2 per barrel; The weekly average price of Brent crude rose to $66.6 per barrel.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/2ea9504a69c4ccccc0e74ff1a56da96e.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"396\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/e2a42a869453a51bf63a352119f75e6a.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"402\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>6. Real Estate: The US existing home sales index rose year-on-year in March.</b></p><p>The U.S. S&P/CS home price index rose for the eighth consecutive month in February. The U.S. S&P/CS home price index rose 11.9% year-over-year to 246.0 in February, marking its eighth consecutive month of gains. The U.S. existing home sales index rose sharply by 23.3% year-on-year and 1.9% month-on-month in March.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/6ac3751240b8a02c34f4c66d93fb255b.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"398\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>New home starts and construction orders in Japan rose sharply in March. New home starts in Japan in March rose 1.5% year-on-year and 18.1% month-on-month, while construction orders in March rose 12.5% year-on-year and 192.7% month-on-month, the highest increase in nearly a year.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/e961519800be12d5e185f10acff56a58.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"392\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>U.S. 5-year mortgage rates fell, while 15-year and 30-year mortgage rates rose. In the week ending April 29, the 5-year mortgage rate fell 0.2 percentage points to 2.6%, while the 15-year and 30-year mortgage rates rose to 2.3% and 3.0%, respectively. In the week ending April 23, the U.S. MBA market index fell 18.2 to 706.6, indicating a slight cooling of housing market activity.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/2eb2b206b830b79a11aed2265d986bec.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"395\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>7. Monetary policy and exchange rates: the US Dollar Index fell, while gold prices remained basically stable.</b></p><p>This week, the Federal Reserve held its interest rate meeting, Powell's speech was dovish, the US Dollar Index fell, and gold prices remained basically stable. On April 28 local time, the Federal Reserve released its interest rate meeting statement. At the post-meeting press conference, Powell said that it would take some time to see substantial progress, and that the current scale of asset purchases would be maintained before that. It was not yet time to discuss Taper, and the US Dollar Index continued to decline. As of April 29, the the US Dollar Index closed at 90.6140, down 0.7% from the previous week; The euro and the pound sterling closed at 1.2129 and 1.3906 against the dollar respectively (pound sterling exchange rate data as of the 28th), appreciating 0.7% and depreciating 0.2% respectively from last week; The Canadian dollar strengthened, closing at 1.2292, up 1.7% from last week, as the Bank of Canada took the lead in tapering. The average weekly price of gold in London this week was $1,774.8 per ounce, basically stable from last week, with a year-on-year increase of 1.2 percentage points to 3.6%.</p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/c2e4e8d549f84a56f7d651806cc3a657.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"398\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><img src=\"http://img.zhitongcaijing.com/images/contentformat/09b461fbeb60aed3abf2e7ffd691b486.jpg\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"551\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"http://www.zhitongcaijing.com/content/detail/466474.html\">智通财经网</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://img.zhitongcaijing.com/image/20210501/20210501134714_46528.png?x-oss-process=image/format,jpg/quality,Q_80/resize,w_250","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"http://www.zhitongcaijing.com/content/detail/466474.html","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/6ca2dcdccfa2217fb20a0351f4efe814","article_id":"2132567538","content_text":"本文来自“申万宏源宏观”。摘要一、周观点：美国一季度GDP究竟是偏强还是偏弱?21Q1美国GDP同比0.4%，略低于市场预期。美国21Q1  GDP实际同比0.4%，疫情以来首次同比转正，环比1.6%。主要贡献因素为商品消费、服务消费、非住宅投资，显示出疫情改善+财政补贴下美国经济快速复苏。但主要拖累项为私人存货变动及进口，且实际上，美国一季度GDP增速是小幅低于市场预期的，显示市场对美国过度财政补贴导致生产恢复缓慢的认识不足，以及对疫情改善过度乐观的预期。居民消费：补贴推动商品消费，疫情缓和服务业修复。1)21Q1美国个人消费支出拉动GDP同比1.1个百分点，较20Q4大幅改善3个百分点。商品消费主要为耐用品推动，而服务消费对GDP拉动的改善幅度大于耐用品消费;2)月度高频角度，3月PCE同比8.5%，环比3.7%，在2月直接补贴真空期小幅回落后再度走强。显示3月1400美金补贴发放对于消费立竿见影的刺激效果，以及防控措施放松下服务消费的恢复。但从服务消费恢复的强度来看，实际上略弱于2-3月海外市场的过度乐观预期。投资：设备投资改善显著，利率抑制地产投资，补库存并未出现。21Q1国内私人投资拉动GDP同比0.8个百分点，较4季度小幅改善0.1个百分点。1)非住宅投资改善显示美国生产部门对经济前景预期有所改善;2)私人存货变动对21Q1  GDP同比贡献的下降是美国经济供需撕裂的体现，需求旺盛而生产恢复缓慢，从而导致库存下降，这也就意味着Q1大宗商品价格的走强并不能得到美国工业生产强劲、主动补库存逻辑的支持;3)住宅投资对GDP同比贡献基本保持稳定，环比增速则随前期美国利率的整体抬升而受到抑制。后续预计将随着利率的中期上行过程而持续降温。政府支出和净出口：补贴推动政府支出增加，供需缺口拉大导致进口高增。美国经济供需撕裂导致净出口对GDP拖累程度再度加深。21Q1净出口拖累GDP同比2个百分点，拖累程度较上20Q4扩大0.7个百分点。政府支出21Q1对GDP同比拉动0.1个百分点，主要由于美国政府向银行体系发放针对居民的直接补贴支票以及购买疫苗费用。预计美国经济复苏2季度为高点，关注疫情后续进展。我们认为未来美国经济恢复的强度依赖于疫苗接种进程，以及新冠疫情的扩散情况。在美国疫情持续缓和、服务业渐进修复的假设下，预计2季度为美国经济恢复高点，但由于过度补贴导致的供需撕裂情况将持续到9月份，年内美国经济恢复的强度或将不会如市场预期一般强劲。个人消费支出：预计1季度是商品消费高点，服务业消费将继续随着疫情缓和而渐进式恢复，但美国本土及海外国家传染性更强的病毒变种的传播也将影响后续服务业恢复强度;投资：非住宅投资的改善需要关注后续疫情进展。住宅投资将随着地产市场的逐步降温而走低;私人库存变动或要等到9月失业补贴结束之后得以改善。政府支出和净出口：政府支出预计将在4季度前持续对GDP同比形成正贡献。净出口将随着今年后期供需缺口的收窄而回到正常水平。二、全球宏观数据本周高频数据：美国耐用品新订单同环比均上升疫情：美国新增确诊病例下降。需求：日本零售销售同比大幅回升。供给与就业：美国耐用品新订单同环比均上升。贸易：美国3月进出口同比均大幅上升。通胀和大宗商品：油价小幅上行。房地产：美3月成屋签约销售指数上升。货币政策和汇率：美元指数下跌，黄金价格稳定。全球宏观日历：关注美国ISM制造业PMI正文一、周观点：美国一季度GDP究竟是偏强还是偏弱?1.21Q1美国GDP同比0.4%，略低于市场预期美国21Q1GDP实际同比0.4%，疫情以来首次同比转正，环比1.6%。主要贡献因素为商品消费、服务消费、非住宅投资，显示出疫情改善+财政补贴下美国经济相对较快的复苏。主要拖累项为私人存货变动及进口，且实际上，美国一季度GDP增速是小幅低于市场预期的，显示市场对美国过度财政补贴导致生产恢复缓慢的认识不足，以及对疫情改善过度乐观的预期。2.居民消费：补贴推动商品消费，疫情缓和服务业修复21Q1高达2000美金/人的财政补贴拉动商品消费;疫情缓和推动服务消费恢复，但略弱于前期海外市场乐观预期。1)从季度角度看，21Q1美国个人消费支出拉动GDP同比1.1个百分点，较20Q4大幅改善3个百分点，从4季度对GDP最大的拖累项一跃转为最大的贡献项，显示一季度同时具备1月600美金补贴以及3月开始发放的1400美金补贴对消费的刺激效果，以及疫情缓和下服务消费的渐次释放。2)而从月度高频角度，3月PCE同比达到8.5%，环比3.7%，在2月直接补贴真空期小幅回落后再度走强。其中，耐用品、服务消费同比增速再度提升，3月分别达到43.3%和4.8%，而非耐用品同比略有放缓(4.3%)，显示3月1400美金补贴发放对于消费立竿见影的刺激效果，以及防控措施放松下服务消费的恢复。但从服务消费恢复的强度来看，实际上略弱于2-3月海外市场的过度乐观预期。商品消费、服务消费共同驱动个人消费支出高增。1)商品消费主要为耐用品推动。21Q1商品消费对GDP拉动3.2个百分点，较20Q4改善1.5个百分点，主要归功于耐用品在一季度财政刺激下再度高增，21Q1耐用品对GDP贡献度较4季度大幅改善1.3个百分点，而非耐用品对GDP贡献度仅小幅改善0.3个百分点;2)服务消费对GDP拉动效果的改善幅度大于耐用品消费。21Q1服务消费对GDP虽然仍为-1.4%的负拉动，但已较上季度大幅改善1.6个百分点，改善幅度更甚于耐用品消费，显示出服务消费在财政补贴+疫情缓和双重因素下改善的弹性更大。3.投资：设备投资改善显著，利率抑制地产投资，补库存并未出现非住宅投资对GDP拉动效果大幅改善，私人存货转为拖累。21Q1国内私人投资拉动GDP同比0.8个百分点，较4季度小幅改善0.1个百分点。1)非住宅投资改善显示美国生产部门对经济前景预期有所改善。私人投资改善的主要贡献因素为非住宅投资(改善0.6个百分点)，其中主要来自于设备投资，显示制造业企业对经济恢复前景保持乐观。2)私人存货变动对21Q1  GDP同比贡献的下降是美国经济供需撕裂的体现，需求旺盛而生产恢复缓慢，从而导致库存下降，这也就意味着Q1大宗商品价格的走强并不能得到美国工业生产强劲、主动补库存逻辑的支持。拖累私人投资的主要因素为私人存货变动(拖累0.4个百分点)。3)住宅投资对GDP同比贡献基本保持稳定，环比增速则随前期美国利率的整体抬升而受到抑制。后续预计将随着利率的中期上行过程而持续降温。21Q1住宅投资对GDP的拉动保持稳定，但随着21年以来抵押贷款利率的逐步上行，美国房地产市场已经有所降温，住宅营建支出、成屋销售已经有所放缓，预计后续住宅投资对GDP的拉动效果将逐步下降。4.政府支出和净出口：补贴推动政府支出增加，供需缺口拉大导致进口高增美国经济供需撕裂导致净出口对GDP拖累程度再度加深。21Q1净出口拖累GDP同比2个百分点，拖累程度较上20Q4扩大0.7个百分点。1)出口拖累1个百分点，但已较上个季度改善0.2个百分点，显示美国工业生产的小幅恢复，但相比个人消费支出3.0个百分点的改善幅度仍然相形见绌，实际体现的是美国过度财政补贴下21Q1供需缺口的拉大;2)而进口在21Q1拖累GDP同比1.0个百分点，拖累程度较上季度大幅扩大0.9个百分点，美国供需缺口拉大的直接后果便是进口规模的扩大。政府支出21Q1对GDP同比拉动0.1个百分点，主要由于美国政府向银行体系发放针对居民的直接补贴支票以及购买疫苗费用。5.预计美国经济复苏2季度为高点，关注疫情后续进展展望未来，我们认为未来美国经济恢复的强度依赖于疫苗接种进程，以及新冠疫情的扩散情况。在美国疫情持续缓和、服务业渐进修复的假设下，预计2季度为美国经济恢复高点，但由于过度补贴导致的供需撕裂情况将持续到9月份，年内美国经济恢复的强度或将不会如市场预期一般强劲。个人消费支出：1)虽然21Q1商品消费显示出极为强劲的势头，但我们预计1季度已经是商品消费高点，后续将随着补贴退潮而逐步回落;2)服务业消费将继续随着疫情缓和而渐进式恢复，但3月以来全球疫情有所反弹，特别是在欧洲国家以及新兴国家，同时美国本土及海外国家传染性更强的病毒变种的传播也将影响后续服务业恢复强度。投资：1)21Q1非住宅投资的改善主要驱动力为经济向好预期，而从当前时点来看，全球疫情是决定经济恢复强度的核心因素，需要关注后续疫情进展;2)住宅投资将随着地产市场的逐步降温而走低;3)私人库存变动，即补库存的力度将依赖于美国供需撕裂的现状是否能够缓和，从当前来看，或要等到9月失业补贴结束之后，美国供需两端才能出现显著的弥合趋势，进而带动库存投资。政府支出和净出口：1)随着失业补贴在2、3季度的持续发放，政府支出预计将在4季度前持续对GDP同比形成正贡献，而如果美国就业计划或美国家庭计划能够在年内落地，也将提振政府支出水平;净出口方面，出口将依赖于美国工业生产恢复的进度，如上文所说，或要到4季度才能得到提振，进口则恰恰相反，将随着今年后期供需缺口的收窄而回落到正常水平。二、全球宏观数据：美国新增确诊病例下降1.疫情：美国新增确诊病例下降本周美国新增确诊病例下降。美国新增确诊7日平均下降至5.3万人以上。截止4月29日，全球新冠疫情累计确诊超过1.5亿，累计死亡病例314万人，累计康复病例1.2亿人。本周四天(4月27日-4月30日)美国、英国分别新增确诊病例22万人和0.9万人。截止4月28日，全球范围内平均每百人接种新冠疫苗最多的是以色列，达每百人121.1针，美国每百人70.2针，英国每百人70.9针。截止4月28日，全球范围内完全接种疫苗的人占人口比例最高的是以色列，达58.7%，美国、英国分别为29.3%、20.7%。2.需求：日本零售销售同比大幅回升日本零售销售和批发销售同比均大幅上行。日本3月零售销售指数同比5.3%，其中零售中纺织服装同比15.8%，3月批发销售指数同比1.0%。韩国3月零售销售同比持续增长，半耐用品消费大幅增长。韩国3月零售销售同比较上月上升3.5个百分点至13.5%，其中半耐用品消费增速最快，同比35.5%;耐用品同比13.6%，非耐用品同比6.5%。3.供给与就业：美国耐用品新订单同环比均上升美国耐用品库存上升，新订单增速同环比均上升。3月美国耐用品库存达4318.4亿美元，环比上升1.0%，同比增长1.7%。美国3月耐用品新订单环比上升0.5%，同比大幅上升25%。日本3月失业率下降至2.6%。3月日本失业率较上月下降0.3个百分点至2.6%。韩国工业生产指数同环比均上升，工业持续回升。韩国3月工业生产指数同比上升5.7%，环比上升0.8%至112.6。美国工业材料生产持续上升。1)截止4月24日当周，美国周度粗钢产量同比上升43.6%，产能利用率较上周小幅上升0.4个百分点至78.4%;2)截止4月23日，美国炼油厂可运营能力利用率上升0.4个百分点至85.4%。美国当周初请失业金人数小幅下降，持续申领失业金人数小幅上升。4月24日当周美国初请失业金人数达55.3万人，环比上周下降1.3万人;4月17日当周持续申领失业金人数达366万人，环比上升0.9万人。4.贸易：美国3月进出口同比均大幅上升美国3月进出口同比均大幅上升。美国3月出口增速较上月大幅上升16.5个百分点至11.5%，进口同比20.6%。美国3月份商品贸易差额为-905.9亿美元。5.通胀和大宗商品：油价小幅上行4月28日当周EIA原油库存上升900万桶，美国原油产量小幅下降10万桶/日至1090万桶/日。截止4月29日，WTI原油周均价上升至63.2美元/桶;布油周均价上升至66.6美元/桶。6.房地产：美国3月成屋签约销售指数同比上升美国2月标普/CS房价指数连续8个月上涨。2月美国标普/CS房价指数同比上升11.9%至246.0，连续8个月上涨。美国3月成屋签约销售指数同比大幅23.3%，环比1.9%。日本3月新屋开工、营建订单大幅上行。日本3月新屋开工同比1.5%，环比18.1%，3月营建订单数同比12.5%，环比192.7%，涨幅达到近一年最高。美国5年期抵押贷款利率下降，15年期、30年期抵押贷款利率上升。截止4月29日当周，5年期抵押贷款利率下降0.2个百分点至2.6%，15年期、30年期抵押贷款利率分别上升至2.3%和3.0%。截止4月23日当周，美国MBA市场指数下降18.2至706.6，房市热度小幅回落。7.货币政策和汇率：美元指数下跌，黄金价格基本稳定本周美联储议息会议召开，鲍威尔发言偏鸽，美元指数下跌，黄金价格基本稳定。当地时间4月28日，美联储公布议息会议声明，鲍威尔在会后新闻发布会上表示看到实质性进展仍需一些时间，在此之前会维持当前的资产购买规模，现在还未到讨论Taper的时间，美元指数持续下行。截至4月29日，美元指数报收90.6140，较上周下行0.7%;欧元、英镑兑美元汇率(英镑汇率数据截至28日)分别报收1.2129、1.3906，分别较上周升值0.7%、贬值0.2%;由于加拿大央行率先Taper，加元走强，报收1.2292，较上周升值1.7%。本周伦敦金周均价1774.8美元/盎司，较上周基本稳定，同比涨幅较上周下行1.2pct至3.6%。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"ZBmain":0.9,".DJI":0.9,"ZTmain":0.9,"ZFmain":0.9,"ZNmain":0.9,"UBmain":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1655,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":975192876,"gmtCreate":1600477207395,"gmtModify":1705064706487,"author":{"id":"3536928846214760","authorId":"3536928846214760","name":"東海吉龍","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0ef8466588cf515f97a20c636e2be8a0","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3536928846214760","idStr":"3536928846214760"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"??","listText":"??","text":"??","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/975192876","repostId":"976538100","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":976538100,"gmtCreate":1599751203694,"gmtModify":1705062659052,"author":{"id":"3491416357875149","authorId":"3491416357875149","name":"Owen_trading room","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/5d4e379a31618023c7f5cc95a2df3468","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3491416357875149","idStr":"3491416357875149"},"themes":[],"title":"10個點的調整已經結束了嗎？關於當前美股大盤，這裏有你應瞭解的一切","htmlText":"標題裝個像，不喜勿噴? 納指終於在50日均線處企穩了，可能你現在最大的兩個問題就是： 第一：美股的暴跌是否已經結束？大盤會就此開始止跌回升嗎？ 第二：在下一輪的上漲中，科技股還是否會扮演領漲板塊的角色，什麼類型的股票纔是下一輪行情當中的首選呢？ 這次分享，咱們不說一些虛頭八腦的東西，直接解決上面兩個問題，而且只用邏輯和數據說話。 首先，美股大跌是否已經結束？ 大跌是結束了，但大幅震盪則是剛剛開始，像之前那樣納指單邊上揚的行情應該是不會再出現了。類似前幾個交易日那樣，突然的閃跌兩個到三個點情況，可能還會更多。 爲什麼？看下面納指ETF和vix的技術分析圖，雖然納指在50日均線處站穩，但波動率指數VIX並沒能隨着指數的反彈而跌破50日均線，反而停留在大跌前的位置，指數未來的波動仍然很大。從我經常跟蹤的幾個盤面指標看，技術面給出的信息很明顯，區間震盪。 你看，上方RIS已經跌破50均線，看多情緒降低不少，即便是出現反彈，RSI也沒能走破50的中軸線，其他MACD，和PPO都是死叉，負柱向下延伸，沒有企穩的跡象，成交量震盪指標PVO倒是出現背離價格的一波拉昇，短期成交量均線高出長期成交量均線不少，這說明目前價格趨勢向下，但在大跌後的這個價位有不少買盤認可。短期內跌破怕是不容易，但向上走也很難。 特別是能量潮OBV的滯漲，說明買賣盤兩方的力量均衡。 顯然，恐慌並沒有被充分的釋放出來，這次的調整就難以決定是不是已經築底。 我之前分享過多次的一個指標，A/D 積累曲線圖（不瞭解這個指標的朋友可以翻看下我之前的分享）他的50-50賣盤信號，也沒有被完全的觸發,指數觸及50日均線又被拉了上去，RSI的50均線反到是跌破。這個圖形也意味着盤面會圍繞目前的位置做拉鋸整理。 第一波的調整已經告一段落，而崩盤又是不可能的，所以就看大盤圍繞50日均線會做什麼文章吧，假如美聯儲沒有任何態度和行動上的變化","listText":"標題裝個像，不喜勿噴? 納指終於在50日均線處企穩了，可能你現在最大的兩個問題就是： 第一：美股的暴跌是否已經結束？大盤會就此開始止跌回升嗎？ 第二：在下一輪的上漲中，科技股還是否會扮演領漲板塊的角色，什麼類型的股票纔是下一輪行情當中的首選呢？ 這次分享，咱們不說一些虛頭八腦的東西，直接解決上面兩個問題，而且只用邏輯和數據說話。 首先，美股大跌是否已經結束？ 大跌是結束了，但大幅震盪則是剛剛開始，像之前那樣納指單邊上揚的行情應該是不會再出現了。類似前幾個交易日那樣，突然的閃跌兩個到三個點情況，可能還會更多。 爲什麼？看下面納指ETF和vix的技術分析圖，雖然納指在50日均線處站穩，但波動率指數VIX並沒能隨着指數的反彈而跌破50日均線，反而停留在大跌前的位置，指數未來的波動仍然很大。從我經常跟蹤的幾個盤面指標看，技術面給出的信息很明顯，區間震盪。 你看，上方RIS已經跌破50均線，看多情緒降低不少，即便是出現反彈，RSI也沒能走破50的中軸線，其他MACD，和PPO都是死叉，負柱向下延伸，沒有企穩的跡象，成交量震盪指標PVO倒是出現背離價格的一波拉昇，短期成交量均線高出長期成交量均線不少，這說明目前價格趨勢向下，但在大跌後的這個價位有不少買盤認可。短期內跌破怕是不容易，但向上走也很難。 特別是能量潮OBV的滯漲，說明買賣盤兩方的力量均衡。 顯然，恐慌並沒有被充分的釋放出來，這次的調整就難以決定是不是已經築底。 我之前分享過多次的一個指標，A/D 積累曲線圖（不瞭解這個指標的朋友可以翻看下我之前的分享）他的50-50賣盤信號，也沒有被完全的觸發,指數觸及50日均線又被拉了上去，RSI的50均線反到是跌破。這個圖形也意味着盤面會圍繞目前的位置做拉鋸整理。 第一波的調整已經告一段落，而崩盤又是不可能的，所以就看大盤圍繞50日均線會做什麼文章吧，假如美聯儲沒有任何態度和行動上的變化","text":"標題裝個像，不喜勿噴? 納指終於在50日均線處企穩了，可能你現在最大的兩個問題就是： 第一：美股的暴跌是否已經結束？大盤會就此開始止跌回升嗎？ 第二：在下一輪的上漲中，科技股還是否會扮演領漲板塊的角色，什麼類型的股票纔是下一輪行情當中的首選呢？ 這次分享，咱們不說一些虛頭八腦的東西，直接解決上面兩個問題，而且只用邏輯和數據說話。 首先，美股大跌是否已經結束？ 大跌是結束了，但大幅震盪則是剛剛開始，像之前那樣納指單邊上揚的行情應該是不會再出現了。類似前幾個交易日那樣，突然的閃跌兩個到三個點情況，可能還會更多。 爲什麼？看下面納指ETF和vix的技術分析圖，雖然納指在50日均線處站穩，但波動率指數VIX並沒能隨着指數的反彈而跌破50日均線，反而停留在大跌前的位置，指數未來的波動仍然很大。從我經常跟蹤的幾個盤面指標看，技術面給出的信息很明顯，區間震盪。 你看，上方RIS已經跌破50均線，看多情緒降低不少，即便是出現反彈，RSI也沒能走破50的中軸線，其他MACD，和PPO都是死叉，負柱向下延伸，沒有企穩的跡象，成交量震盪指標PVO倒是出現背離價格的一波拉昇，短期成交量均線高出長期成交量均線不少，這說明目前價格趨勢向下，但在大跌後的這個價位有不少買盤認可。短期內跌破怕是不容易，但向上走也很難。 特別是能量潮OBV的滯漲，說明買賣盤兩方的力量均衡。 顯然，恐慌並沒有被充分的釋放出來，這次的調整就難以決定是不是已經築底。 我之前分享過多次的一個指標，A/D 積累曲線圖（不瞭解這個指標的朋友可以翻看下我之前的分享）他的50-50賣盤信號，也沒有被完全的觸發,指數觸及50日均線又被拉了上去，RSI的50均線反到是跌破。這個圖形也意味着盤面會圍繞目前的位置做拉鋸整理。 第一波的調整已經告一段落，而崩盤又是不可能的，所以就看大盤圍繞50日均線會做什麼文章吧，假如美聯儲沒有任何態度和行動上的變化","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2b93be211dfc6d634afddac8fa4fa00d","width":"1080","height":"586"},{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3f1ea78884f057833b0ce66cd2f58cbd","width":"878","height":"489"},{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4e2795092660ed23c1fb2b19a5421591","width":"800","height":"816"}],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":2,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/976538100","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":22,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1341,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"3527667803686145","authorId":"3527667803686145","name":"社区成长助手","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2b7c7106b5c0c8b0037faa67439d898f","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3527667803686145","idStr":"3527667803686145"},"content":"Finally, when you first post [compare heart] [compare heart] post, you can get more exposure by related stocks or related topics. If you want to create high-quality articles, please checkGuidelines for Tiger Community Creation","text":"Finally, when you first post [compare heart] [compare heart] post, you can get more exposure by related stocks or related topics. If you want to create high-quality articles, please checkGuidelines for Tiger Community Creation","html":"Finally, when you first post [compare heart] [compare heart] post, you can get more exposure by related stocks or related topics. If you want to create high-quality articles, please checkGuidelines for Tiger Community Creation"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":131283763,"gmtCreate":1621863226252,"gmtModify":1704363464048,"author":{"id":"3536928846214760","authorId":"3536928846214760","name":"東海吉龍","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0ef8466588cf515f97a20c636e2be8a0","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3536928846214760","idStr":"3536928846214760"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"666","listText":"666","text":"666","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/131283763","repostId":"1120894920","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":5703,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":104068993,"gmtCreate":1620345931912,"gmtModify":1704342217749,"author":{"id":"3536928846214760","authorId":"3536928846214760","name":"東海吉龍","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0ef8466588cf515f97a20c636e2be8a0","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3536928846214760","idStr":"3536928846214760"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"666","listText":"666","text":"666","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/104068993","repostId":"2133691576","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2133691576","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"为用户提供金融资讯、行情、数据，旨在帮助投资者理解世界，做投资决策。","home_visible":1,"media_name":"老虎资讯综合","id":"102","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1620333000,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2133691576?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-07 04:30","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Dropbox reported first-quarter revenue of $510 million, with net profit up 21% year-over-year.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2133691576","media":"老虎资讯综合","summary":"5月7日，云存储服务提供商Dropbox美股盘后公布了该公司的2021财年第一季度财报。报告显示，Dropbox第一季度总营收为5.116亿美元，与上年同期的4.550亿美元相比增长12%，不计入汇率","content":"<p>On May 7, cloud storage service providers<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMC\">Dropbox</a>The company released its financial results for the first quarter of fiscal year 2021 after the US stock market closed. The report shows that Dropbox's total revenue for the first quarter was $511.6 million, a 12% increase compared to $455 million in the same period last year, and an 11% year-over-year increase excluding the impact of currency fluctuations. Net income was $47.6 million, a 21% increase compared to a net income of $39.3 million in the same period last year; Non-GAAP adjusted net income was $141.8 million, compared with $69.8 million in the same period last year.</p><p>Dropbox's first-quarter revenue and adjusted earnings per share both exceeded Wall Street analysts' expectations, driving its stock price up nearly 2% in after-hours trading.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7cdec3e6dcc56ee4828167017836a71e\" tg-width=\"1302\" tg-height=\"833\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>First Quarter Results Summary:</b></p><p>Dropbox's total revenue for the first quarter was $511.6 million, a 12% increase compared to $455 million in the same period last year, and an 11% increase year-over-year excluding the impact of currency fluctuations, exceeding Wall Street analysts' expectations. according to<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/YHOO\">Yahoo</a>Data provided by the financial channel shows that nine analysts had previously expected Dropbox's total revenue to reach $505.18 million in the first quarter.</p><p>According to U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, Dropbox's net profit for the first quarter was $47.6 million, a 21% increase compared to a net profit of $39.3 million in the same period last year. Excluding certain one-time items (not in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles), Dropbox's adjusted net income for the first quarter was $141.8 million, compared to $69.8 million in the same period last year.</p><p>Under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, Dropbox's diluted earnings per share attributable to common shareholders for the first quarter were $0.12, compared to $0.09 in the same period last year. Excluding certain one-time items (not in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles), Dropbox's diluted earnings per share attributable to common shareholders for the first quarter were $0.35, compared to $0.17 in the same period last year, which also exceeded Wall Street analysts' expectations. according to<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/YHOO\">Yahoo</a>Data provided by the financial channel shows that 10 analysts had previously expected Dropbox's adjusted earnings per share to reach $0.30 in the first quarter.</p><p>Dropbox reported a gross profit of $402.3 million in the first quarter, compared to $351.9 million in the same period last year. Dropbox reported operating profit of $42.5 million in the first quarter, compared to $26.8 million in the same period last year.</p><p>Dropbox's total operating expenses for the first quarter were $359.8 million, compared to $325.1 million in the same period last year. Of this, R&D expenditure was US$181.2 million, compared to US$181.8 million in the same period of the previous year; Sales and marketing expenses were $102.7 million, compared to $104.3 million in the same period last year; General and administrative expenses amounted to $58.6 million, compared to $39 million in the same period of the previous year; Impairment charges related to real estate assets amounted to $17.3 million, compared to no such charge in the same period last year.</p><p>As of the end of the first quarter, Dropbox's total ARR (accounting rate of return, a method of measuring profitability) was $2.112 billion, a 13% increase compared to the same period last year. Excluding the impact of currency fluctuations, Dropbox's total ARR as of the end of the first quarter increased by $60.5 million compared to the previous quarter, representing a 12% increase compared to the same period last year.</p><p>As of the end of the first quarter, Dropbox had 15.83 million paying users, compared to 14.59 million at the end of the first quarter of fiscal year 2020. The average revenue per paying user was $132.55, compared to $126.30 in the same period last year.</p><p>According to U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, Dropbox's gross profit margin for the first quarter was 78.6%, compared to 77.3% in the same period last year. Excluding certain one-time items (not in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles), Dropbox's gross margin for the first quarter was 80.2%, compared to 78.3% in the same period last year.</p><p>According to U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, Dropbox's operating profit margin for the first quarter was 8.3%, compared to 5.9% in the same period last year. Excluding certain one-time items (not in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles), Dropbox's operating profit margin for the first quarter was 29.1%, compared to 16.1% in the same period last year.</p><p>Dropbox's net cash from operating activities in the first quarter was $115.7 million, compared to $53.3 million in the same period last year. Dropbox's operating cash flow for the first quarter was $108.8 million, compared to $25.5 million in the same period last year.</p><p>As of the end of the first quarter, Dropbox held $1.916 billion in cash and cash equivalents, as well as short-term investments.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Dropbox reported first-quarter revenue of $510 million, with net profit up 21% year-over-year.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDropbox reported first-quarter revenue of $510 million, with net profit up 21% year-over-year.\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/102\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">老虎资讯综合 </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-05-07 04:30</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>On May 7, cloud storage service providers<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMC\">Dropbox</a>The company released its financial results for the first quarter of fiscal year 2021 after the US stock market closed. The report shows that Dropbox's total revenue for the first quarter was $511.6 million, a 12% increase compared to $455 million in the same period last year, and an 11% year-over-year increase excluding the impact of currency fluctuations. Net income was $47.6 million, a 21% increase compared to a net income of $39.3 million in the same period last year; Non-GAAP adjusted net income was $141.8 million, compared with $69.8 million in the same period last year.</p><p>Dropbox's first-quarter revenue and adjusted earnings per share both exceeded Wall Street analysts' expectations, driving its stock price up nearly 2% in after-hours trading.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7cdec3e6dcc56ee4828167017836a71e\" tg-width=\"1302\" tg-height=\"833\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>First Quarter Results Summary:</b></p><p>Dropbox's total revenue for the first quarter was $511.6 million, a 12% increase compared to $455 million in the same period last year, and an 11% increase year-over-year excluding the impact of currency fluctuations, exceeding Wall Street analysts' expectations. according to<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/YHOO\">Yahoo</a>Data provided by the financial channel shows that nine analysts had previously expected Dropbox's total revenue to reach $505.18 million in the first quarter.</p><p>According to U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, Dropbox's net profit for the first quarter was $47.6 million, a 21% increase compared to a net profit of $39.3 million in the same period last year. Excluding certain one-time items (not in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles), Dropbox's adjusted net income for the first quarter was $141.8 million, compared to $69.8 million in the same period last year.</p><p>Under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, Dropbox's diluted earnings per share attributable to common shareholders for the first quarter were $0.12, compared to $0.09 in the same period last year. Excluding certain one-time items (not in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles), Dropbox's diluted earnings per share attributable to common shareholders for the first quarter were $0.35, compared to $0.17 in the same period last year, which also exceeded Wall Street analysts' expectations. according to<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/YHOO\">Yahoo</a>Data provided by the financial channel shows that 10 analysts had previously expected Dropbox's adjusted earnings per share to reach $0.30 in the first quarter.</p><p>Dropbox reported a gross profit of $402.3 million in the first quarter, compared to $351.9 million in the same period last year. Dropbox reported operating profit of $42.5 million in the first quarter, compared to $26.8 million in the same period last year.</p><p>Dropbox's total operating expenses for the first quarter were $359.8 million, compared to $325.1 million in the same period last year. Of this, R&D expenditure was US$181.2 million, compared to US$181.8 million in the same period of the previous year; Sales and marketing expenses were $102.7 million, compared to $104.3 million in the same period last year; General and administrative expenses amounted to $58.6 million, compared to $39 million in the same period of the previous year; Impairment charges related to real estate assets amounted to $17.3 million, compared to no such charge in the same period last year.</p><p>As of the end of the first quarter, Dropbox's total ARR (accounting rate of return, a method of measuring profitability) was $2.112 billion, a 13% increase compared to the same period last year. Excluding the impact of currency fluctuations, Dropbox's total ARR as of the end of the first quarter increased by $60.5 million compared to the previous quarter, representing a 12% increase compared to the same period last year.</p><p>As of the end of the first quarter, Dropbox had 15.83 million paying users, compared to 14.59 million at the end of the first quarter of fiscal year 2020. The average revenue per paying user was $132.55, compared to $126.30 in the same period last year.</p><p>According to U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, Dropbox's gross profit margin for the first quarter was 78.6%, compared to 77.3% in the same period last year. Excluding certain one-time items (not in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles), Dropbox's gross margin for the first quarter was 80.2%, compared to 78.3% in the same period last year.</p><p>According to U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, Dropbox's operating profit margin for the first quarter was 8.3%, compared to 5.9% in the same period last year. Excluding certain one-time items (not in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles), Dropbox's operating profit margin for the first quarter was 29.1%, compared to 16.1% in the same period last year.</p><p>Dropbox's net cash from operating activities in the first quarter was $115.7 million, compared to $53.3 million in the same period last year. Dropbox's operating cash flow for the first quarter was $108.8 million, compared to $25.5 million in the same period last year.</p><p>As of the end of the first quarter, Dropbox held $1.916 billion in cash and cash equivalents, as well as short-term investments.</p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3a51a02ea9a24f4d4f0b9e4e8e4c6bc7","relate_stocks":{"DBX":"Dropbox Inc."},"is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2133691576","content_text":"5月7日，云存储服务提供商Dropbox美股盘后公布了该公司的2021财年第一季度财报。报告显示，Dropbox第一季度总营收为5.116亿美元，与上年同期的4.550亿美元相比增长12%，不计入汇率变动的影响为同比增长11%；净利润为4760万美元，与上年同期的净利润3930万美元相比增长21%；不按照美国通用会计准则的调整后净利润为1.418亿美元，相比之下上年同期为6980万美元。\nDropbox第一季度营收和调整后每股收益均超出华尔街分析师预期，从而推动其盘后股价上涨近2%。\n\n第一季度业绩概要：\nDropbox第一季度总营收为5.116亿美元，与上年同期的4.550亿美元相比增长12%，不计入汇率变动的影响为同比增长11%，这一业绩超出华尔街分析师预期。据雅虎财经频道提供的数据显示，9名分析师此前平均预期Dropbox第一季度总营收将达5.0518亿美元。\n按照美国通用会计准则，Dropbox第一季度净利润为4760万美元，与上年同期的净利润3930万美元相比增长21%。不计入某些一次性项目（不按照美国通用会计准则），Dropbox第一季度的调整后净利润为1.418亿美元，相比之下上年同期为6980万美元。\n按照美国通用会计准则，Dropbox第一季度归属于普通股股东的每股摊薄收益为0.12美元，相比之下去年同期为0.09美元。不计入某些一次性项目（不按照美国通用会计准则），Dropbox第一季度归属于普通股股东的每股摊薄收益为0.35美元，相比之下去年同期为0.17美元，这一业绩也超出华尔街分析师预期。据雅虎财经频道提供的数据显示，10名分析师此前平均预期Dropbox第一季度调整后每股收益将达0.3美元。\nDropbox第一季度毛利润为4.023亿美元，相比之下上年同期的毛利润为3.519亿美元。Dropbox第一季度运营利润为4250万美元，相比之下上年同期为2680万美元。\nDropbox第一季度总运营支出为3.598亿美元，相比之下上年同期为3.251亿美元。其中，研发支出为1.812亿美元，相比之下上年同期为1.818亿美元；销售和营销支出为1.027亿美元，相比之下上年同期为1.043亿美元；总务和行政支出为5860万美元，相比之下上年同期为3900万美元；与不动产资产相关的减值支出为1730万美元，而上年同期并无这项支出。\n截至第一季度末，Dropbox的总ARR（会计收益率法，一种衡量盈利性的方法）为21.12亿美元，与上年同期相比增长13%。不计入汇率变动影响，Dropbox截至第一季度末的总ARR与上一季度相比增长6050万美元，与上年同期相比增长12%。\n截至第一季度末，Dropbox的付费用户人数为1583万人，相比之下截至2020财年第一季度末为1459万人；平均每付费用户收入为132.55美元，相比之下上年同期为126.30美元。\n按照美国通用会计准则，Dropbox第一季度毛利率为78.6%，相比之下上年同期为77.3%。不计入某些一次性项目（不按照美国通用会计准则），Dropbox第一季度毛利率为80.2%，相比之下上年同期为78.3%。\n按照美国通用会计准则，Dropbox第一季度运营利润率为8.3%，相比之下上年同期为5.9%。不计入某些一次性项目（不按照美国通用会计准则），Dropbox第一季度运营利润率为29.1%，相比之下上年同期为16.1%。\nDropbox第一季度来自于业务运营活动的净现金为1.157亿美元，相比之下上年同期为5330万美元。Dropbox第一季度运营现金流为1.088亿美元，相比之下上年同期为2550万美元。\n截至第一季度末，Dropbox所持现金和现金等价物以及短期投资总额为19.16亿美元。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"DBX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":6990,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":374212552,"gmtCreate":1619448102976,"gmtModify":1704724098062,"author":{"id":"3536928846214760","authorId":"3536928846214760","name":"東海吉龍","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0ef8466588cf515f97a20c636e2be8a0","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3536928846214760","idStr":"3536928846214760"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"666","listText":"666","text":"666","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/374212552","repostId":"1112124246","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1112124246","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1619446921,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1112124246?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-26 22:22","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Copper prices soared to the highest level in a decade and the non-ferrous metals sector rose","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1112124246","media":"智通财经","summary":"高盛将未来12个月铜目标价提高到1.1万美元/吨。","content":"<p>On Monday, April 26, the non-ferrous metals sector rose during trading. As of press time,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FCX\">McMoran Copper Gold</a>It rose more than 6%.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AA\">Alcoa</a>It rose more than 5%.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TRQ\">Turquoise Hill Resources</a>It rose more than 4%, and Albert & Paykel Inc. rose more than 3%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4747a8a90284928bc8ab8f9768b760f4\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Previously, global copper prices soared to their highest level in a decade, with LME copper rising to $9,700 per ton at one point. Including<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GS\">Goldman Sachs</a>Other institutions believe that, given the important role of copper in the green energy transition, the climate goals of various countries will make this round of copper price rebound the beginning of a longer-term rise in copper prices.</p><p>Goldman Sachs has raised its 12-month copper price target to $11,000 per ton, up $500 from its reiterated 12-month copper price target two weeks ago, an increase of nearly 4.8%.</p>","source":"highlight_zhitongcaijin","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Copper prices soared to the highest level in a decade and the non-ferrous metals sector rose</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCopper prices soared to the highest level in a decade and the non-ferrous metals sector rose\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">智通财经</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-04-26 22:22</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>On Monday, April 26, the non-ferrous metals sector rose during trading. As of press time,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FCX\">McMoran Copper Gold</a>It rose more than 6%.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AA\">Alcoa</a>It rose more than 5%.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TRQ\">Turquoise Hill Resources</a>It rose more than 4%, and Albert & Paykel Inc. rose more than 3%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4747a8a90284928bc8ab8f9768b760f4\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Previously, global copper prices soared to their highest level in a decade, with LME copper rising to $9,700 per ton at one point. Including<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GS\">Goldman Sachs</a>Other institutions believe that, given the important role of copper in the green energy transition, the climate goals of various countries will make this round of copper price rebound the beginning of a longer-term rise in copper prices.</p><p>Goldman Sachs has raised its 12-month copper price target to $11,000 per ton, up $500 from its reiterated 12-month copper price target two weeks ago, an increase of nearly 4.8%.</p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"https://www.zhitongcaijing.com/content/detail/458639.html\">智通财经</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eeb9a4d452d8568bcc6a2558535ad160","relate_stocks":{"FCX":"麦克莫兰铜金","AA":"美国铝业"},"source_url":"https://www.zhitongcaijing.com/content/detail/458639.html","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/6ca2dcdccfa2217fb20a0351f4efe814","article_id":"1112124246","content_text":"4月26日(周一)，有色金属板块盘中走高，截至发稿，麦克莫兰铜金涨超6%，美国铝业涨超5%，Turquoise Hill Resources涨超4%，美国雅宝公司涨超3%。此前全球铜价飙升至十年来的最高水平，伦铜一度升至9700美元/吨。包括高盛等机构认为，考虑到铜在绿色能源转型中的重要作用，各国的气候目标将使本轮铜价反弹成为更长维度铜价上涨的开始。高盛将未来12个月铜目标价提高到1.1万美元/吨，较两周前其重申的12个月铜目标价上调500美元，升幅将近4.8%。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"FCX":0.9,"TRQ":0.9,"AA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1501,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":395211797,"gmtCreate":1607670566019,"gmtModify":1704971623587,"author":{"id":"3536928846214760","authorId":"3536928846214760","name":"東海吉龍","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0ef8466588cf515f97a20c636e2be8a0","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3536928846214760","idStr":"3536928846214760"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"??","listText":"??","text":"??","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/395211797","repostId":"1153666475","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1432,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":132724324,"gmtCreate":1622117672068,"gmtModify":1704179755218,"author":{"id":"3536928846214760","authorId":"3536928846214760","name":"東海吉龍","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0ef8466588cf515f97a20c636e2be8a0","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3536928846214760","idStr":"3536928846214760"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"666","listText":"666","text":"666","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/132724324","repostId":"1171660212","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1171660212","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1622115884,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1171660212?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-27 19:44","market":"hk","language":"zh","title":"The United States buys time with money, and the whole world enters a \"new era of mediocrity\"","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1171660212","media":"投资作业本","summary":"全球化配置的时代已经开始了。","content":"<p>This year is not a bear market for US stocks; a bear market is definitely a global systemic risk. \"The Federal Reserve's monetary policy framework has changed drastically since 2019; it has completely changed. Many investors, especially those in mainland China, now believe that the US stock market is going to collapse, that the US is doomed, that inflation in the US stock market is so high, and that the economy is so good. The US is simply overheating. No matter how you look at it, you feel that the Federal Reserve needs to accelerate its tightening pace. But in fact, this kind of thinking is using an 'old map,' that the Federal Reserve has been focusing on inflation for a long time, and that paying attention to inflation is better than anything else.\"</p><p>\"In the second half of the year, the US economy will show resilience. It's not that it will suddenly jump down from eighteen floors, but that it will maintain a range of fluctuations, and the overall marginal growth momentum will weaken. At this time, there is no need to implement stimulus policies. This is the first point. The dimension of US economic growth will slow down, and the month-on-month momentum will weaken.\"</p><p>\"In the second half of the year, the unemployment rate (in the United States) will ease... This round of decline in the unemployment rate in the United States has been relatively smooth, rather than rapid and steep... (The Federal Reserve) will still focus on employment. Before the United States achieves full employment and before the pressure of social conflicts eases, it will be difficult for the United States to recover all at once.\"</p><p>\"US inflation will not fall all at once in the second half of the year. The peak of inflation will be in the second quarter, but inflation may still hover at a high level in the second half of the year. The Federal Reserve needs to control the real interest rate in the US.\"</p><p>\"Against the backdrop of the current great power competition, we believe that the United States is buying time with money. This is a rewriting of the American Dream, which means that whether it is the US dollar, the US dollar exchange rate or the US long-term Treasury yield, they will ultimately obey the so-called new American Dream. Money is used to buy time, time for the US economic recovery and time for the expansion of US domestic demand. Recently, whether it is with South Korea or some other regions, the United States hopes that advanced manufacturing in these regions can come to the United States, buy time for manufacturing to return to the United States, and buy time for US technological innovation and upgrading.\"</p><p>\"Before the policy shift, it is actually predictable that the Federal Reserve will guide market expectations. Moreover, before the Fed's policy, there may be other policies, including taxes.\"</p><p>\"The Federal Reserve's policy is like the master valve of global liquidity, and we are unlikely to see this master valve tighten until at least the first quarter of this year or next year.\"</p><p>\"These companies, which are the backbone of the US stock index, are not expensive. They are not expensive globally, and they are not expensive compared to A-shares. On the contrary, relatively weaker and more thematic companies are more expensive.\"</p><p>\"The US stock market is definitely not a bear market. A bear market in the US stock market at this time is definitely a global systemic risk... As long as the US stock market is not a big bear market, it is a bull or structural market, which will bring opportunities to other markets around the world.\"</p><p>\"Don't think that the US stock index is very strong and ignore the professional and institutional characteristics of the US stock market. I have always said that we should try to focus on buying funds and investing in funds through fixed investment programs, so that professional investors can participate in the US stock market. Don't consider the US stock market with the mindset of speculating on A-shares or with the mindset of retail investors.\"</p><p>\"The world has entered an era of low growth and low interest rates, a new era of mediocrity. At this stage, we need to find the best companies in the world... The era of global allocation has begun.\"</p><p>On May 25, during a live broadcast of \"Cloud Conference | Global Capital Market Linkage, What is the Allocation Value of US Stocks?\" hosted by CBN, Zhang Yidong, Global Chief Strategist at Industrial Securities, shared the above views.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f539f1c96458b7ed999579cf5647d0ff\" tg-width=\"677\" tg-height=\"457\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>The following are the highlights of my investment workbook, which I would like to share with you:</p><p><b>The Federal Reserve's monetary policy framework has changed significantly, and we can no longer think with old-fashioned thinking.</b></p><p>Q: For the first time since the outbreak of the pandemic, Federal Reserve officials have discussed the possibility of tightening monetary policy. What does this mean for global markets?</p><p>Zhang Yidong: If people try to find the way forward using old maps, thinking that the Fed's tightening and bond purchases this time may lead to further tightening in the distant future, their approach is wrong. Conversely, if they conduct more in-depth research on the US stock market, they will find that the Fed's monetary policy framework has changed significantly since 2019 compared to before; it has completely changed.</p><p>Many investors, especially those in mainland China, believe that the US stock market is about to crash and the US is doomed. With inflation so high and the economy so good, the US is simply overheating. No matter how you look at it, you feel that the Federal Reserve needs to accelerate its tightening pace. But in fact, this kind of thinking is using an \"old map,\" believing that the Federal Reserve has been focusing on inflation for a long time and that focusing on inflation is better than anything else.</p><p><b>The US economy remains resilient in the second half of the year, and there is no need for stimulus policies at this time.</b></p><p>The US economy will show resilience in the second half of the year. It's not that it will suddenly jump down from eighteen floors, but rather that it will maintain a range of fluctuations, and the overall marginal growth momentum will weaken. At this point, there is no need for stimulus policies. This is the first point: the dimension of US economic growth will slow down, and the month-on-month momentum will weaken.</p><p>Secondly, in terms of the unemployment rate, the economic data for April was very good. The unemployment rate was 6.1%, slightly higher than in March, indicating a shift from simple to luxurious, and from luxurious to simple and difficult. Over the past year, the United States has experienced three rounds of massive monetary easing and bailouts. Low- and middle-income earners in the United States will take the bailout money to enjoy themselves first and spend it first. The US savings rate is still as high as 13.6%, while the historical average is 6-8%, which is its normal savings rate level. Therefore, they are not in a hurry to work or find jobs. Under these circumstances, the unemployment rate is relatively high.</p><p><b>The Fed's focus remains on employment.</b></p><p>In the second half of the year, the unemployment rate will ease because he needs to find work, and the savings rate will decline. However, the US economy won't be that bad in the second half of the year. He might be able to do odd jobs, which will make the decline in the US unemployment rate relatively smooth, rather than a rapid and steep one.</p><p>The Federal Reserve paid more attention to the unemployment rate, so much so that when the April inflation data was released, on May 12, US time, US inflation far exceeded expectations, causing an uproar in the market. At that time, many risky assets plummeted, triggering minor global turmoil that day.</p><p>However, several important figures with voting rights at the Federal Reserve, including the Fed Vice Chairman and another important official, stated that they saw the data and suggested that inflation caused by short-term transitional supply factors and employment factors were more worrying, so their focus was still on employment. Before the United States achieves full employment and before the pressure of social conflicts eases, it will be difficult for the United States to clean up its mess all at once.</p><p>US inflation peaked in the second quarter, and inflation hovered at a high level in the second half of the year.</p><p>Third, US inflation will not fall all at once in the second half of the year. Inflation will peak in the second quarter, but it may still hover at a high level in the second half of the year, requiring the Federal Reserve to control US real interest rates.</p><p><b>America buys time with money</b></p><p>Real interest rates are crucial to the recovery of the US economy, and in turn, they also play a guiding role in nominal interest rates. As you can see, everyone was very worried in mid-March, but in mid-March we clearly stated that US long-term Treasury yields would not pose a systemic risk. Against the backdrop of the current great power competition, we believe that the US is buying time with money, which is a rewriting of the American Dream. This means that whether it is the US dollar, the US dollar exchange rate, or US long-term Treasury yields, they will ultimately obey the so-called new American Dream. Money is used to buy time, time for the US economic recovery, time for the expansion of US domestic demand. Recently, whether in relations with South Korea or some other regions, the US hopes that advanced manufacturing in these regions can come to the US, buying time for manufacturing to return to the US and time for US technological innovation and upgrading.</p><p>Overall, under the current circumstances, neither employment nor inflation, nor the United States' need to enhance its competitiveness and maintain the sustainability of economic growth, are far from reaching a stage of contraction.</p><p>There are no systemic risks this year, and tightening market concerns have actually provided opportunities to invest in high-quality assets globally.</p><p>To summarize, my view is that everyone needs to see clearly the trump cards of the American elite and Powell's trump cards. Powell will be deciding on a second term next year, and under these circumstances, his focus will be more on the sustainability of economic growth and employment. That's why we say it's irreversible, and there are no systemic risks this year.</p><p>When the market is worried about tightening US policies, which will trigger global concerns, the resulting shock is a short-term disturbance. Instead, it gives us the opportunity to invest in higher-quality and more cost-effective assets globally. This is my thinking.</p><p>What impact would it have if the Federal Reserve's monetary policy shifted to tightening?</p><p>First, contraction will inevitably lead to adjustments in overvalued assets, even in a more drastic way.</p><p>Secondly, if it contracts, it will also lead to differentiation, especially for emerging markets. At that time, it is important to pay attention to the fact that the rebound of the US dollar will create a trend of suppression on commodities, which will put enormous pressure on emerging markets that rely mainly on midstream and upstream raw materials and minerals, and may even lead to debt risks and debt crises in emerging markets.</p><p>For US stocks, high valuations, especially some thematic junk stocks, will undergo a significant adjustment, and history will repeat itself. What should we focus on now? When will it actually turn?</p><p>It is unlikely that the Federal Reserve will tighten its policy this year or even in the first quarter of next year.</p><p>Before the policy shift, it was actually predictable that the Federal Reserve would guide market expectations. Moreover, before the Federal Reserve's policy, there may be other policies, including taxes.</p><p>In the second half of today, there will also be questions about whether tax increases will be approved by the State Taxation Administration, changes in taxes, bond issuance, and fiscal stimulus packages. Overall, we believe that this year and even the beginning of next year, we can basically see the Federal Reserve's trump cards clearly.</p><p>Frankly speaking, the global monetary system is still an international monetary system dominated by the US dollar. Therefore, the Federal Reserve's policy is equivalent to the master valve of global liquidity. At least in the first quarter of this year or even next year, it is difficult to see the master valve tighten.</p><p>It's even possible that the opposite could happen. If the US economy is weaker than people imagine in the second half of the year, the Federal Reserve might slightly amplify the overall valve. This would have the opposite effect, bringing better value-for-money assets worldwide, including some high-quality companies in the US stock market, European stocks, Chinese A-shares, Hong Kong stocks, and emerging market stocks.</p><p>It's okay to have a vague concept of the Fed's judgment. It's difficult to make a judgment about the general trend. It's difficult to be precise down to the month or week. We're taking it one step at a time. At least we can judge that the general trend is that we won't see the Fed tightening this year.</p><p><b>The slow and prolonged bull market in the US stock market is driven by the best companies.</b></p><p>Q: Can US stocks continue to improve? How long will it take for things to improve?</p><p>Zhang Yidong: Let's look at this from three perspectives: First, let's look at this from a structural perspective. The US stock market itself has three major indices. We often talk about the Dow Jones, Nasdaq, and S&P 500. Among these three indices, the best American companies, represented by Apple and Microsoft, mainly lead the index. Similarly, when we select the best companies in China to create an index, we are actually a super bull market.</p><p>Don't get the idea that everything in America is fine. In the US market, a large number of companies have launched, cleared, or delisted directly. A considerable number of companies have no trading volume and are like dead companies, suffering from a discount in liquidity. Therefore, in mature markets, it's truly a winner-takes-all situation. The best companies have reliable performance, and people give them valuations that match their profit growth, so we believe their sustainability is relatively long.</p><p>The US stock market itself is an index system, and its mechanism for effectively selecting the best companies is actually worth learning from. Moreover, its trading mechanism, whether it is T+0 or short selling, ensures its slow and long-term bull market, so that the best companies do not rise several times in a year or a year and a half, only to be Game over and not recover for several years.</p><p>From a structural perspective, the US stock market is driven by the best group of companies, which in turn benefit from its sound market mechanisms, trading mechanisms, and a series of market-oriented mechanisms, resulting in a very small bubble for the best group of companies.</p><p><b>Core companies in the US stock market are not expensive.</b></p><p>We often say that US-listed companies are expensive, but we can say that they are expensive from two perspectives:</p><p>First, the backbone of the US stock market, which can drive the US stock index upwards, is not expensive. It is not expensive globally, and it is not expensive compared to A-shares. On the contrary, those that are relatively weaker and more thematic are more expensive.</p><p>Secondly, because its interest rates are low, after rising for so long, the 10-year Treasury Bond yield in the US stock market is only 1.6 or 1.7. This is the first point. Looking at the structure of the US stock market, until the US substantially tightens the tap (substantial contraction), the path of the most outperforming companies in the US stock market leading the index is unlikely to end.</p><p><b>This year is not a bear market for US stocks; a bear market is definitely a global systemic risk.</b></p><p>Second, differences between countries. We believe that the US stock market is not in a bear market this year. At the end of last year, many people said they were not optimistic about the US stock market this year, but I said that the US stock market is definitely not in a bear market. If the US stock market is in a bear market at this time, it must be a global systemic risk. If the US stock market experiences a bear market this year, it will definitely be because the Federal Reserve has tightened its overall valve. This is a global systemic risk, and neither A-shares, emerging markets, nor European stock markets can withstand it.</p><p>On the second level, from a global perspective, if the United States leads a systemic tightening of the global monetary system, it may not necessarily mean that US stocks are the best performers. Since the beginning of the year, US stocks have underperformed European stock markets, and some of their indices have even underperformed relatively well-performing emerging market stock markets. As long as the US stock market is not a major bear market, but rather a bull or structural market, it presents opportunities for other global markets. This is a comparison between country markets and regional stock markets.</p><p>Third, style. Clearly, the style of US stocks this year has been that small and mid-cap stocks have outperformed large-cap stocks, and cyclical and value stocks have outperformed growth stocks. This has been the case since the beginning of the year. However, there may be changes, and the growth style may improve in the second half of the year.</p><p>From a long-term perspective, the United States is still an economy driven by technology and domestic demand. From a style perspective, its backbone is still these giants with technological innovation capabilities, which are driving the US stock market. This year, the Dow Jones, Russell 3000, and Russell 2000 have performed much better than the Nasdaq since the beginning of the year.</p><p>However, we see that US stocks are not rising and falling simultaneously; they are rising in a style, such as value stocks rising and growth stocks adjusting. Whether it's Chinese concept stocks or pure US stocks in the US, many growth-oriented stocks have actually adjusted by more than 30%-50% since the beginning of this year. Don't assume that the US stock index is very strong and ignore the professional and institutional characteristics of the US stock market. I've always said that we should focus on buying funds and investing in funds through regular fixed-amount investments, so that professional investors can participate in the US stock market. We shouldn't consider the US stock market with the mindset of speculating on A-shares or with the mindset of retail investors.</p><p><b>Three points to note when investing in QDII: Know yourself, use long-term strategies against short-term strategies, and use slow-term strategies</b></p><p>Q: What should I pay attention to when investing in QDII?</p><p>Zhang Yidong: QDII itself is a tool, a product, a product that helps enrich asset allocation. There are a few concerns:</p><p>First, understand yourself. Before understanding a product, first look at what you are like. Because not everyone can make money on certain products. For example, the products of some famous fund managers may have increased dozens of times in more than ten years, but it was useless. Holders sold them after a short while.</p><p>Some people say that buying QDII is like buying various A-share products. When I make a swing trade, I often end up losing money. Knowing yourself is very important. Your risk tolerance is different whether you should make a swing trade or just make a long-term allocation.</p><p>Second, focus on using long-term strategies to combat After buying, try to know that the QDII you are buying is in a relatively unfamiliar market outside your own circle of competence. You need to go through a relatively familiar process with the fund manager. You need to be truly professional and have a genuine understanding of the market. Recognizing that making money in the US stock market doesn't depend on timing, but on good, high-quality companies. Investing in companies when they offer suitable cost-effectiveness is ultimately a measure of value.</p><p>Third, fight fast with slow motion. Because people are interested in overseas markets, they often feel that the A-share market is hopeless and prefer to invest their money, as the returns are better than those in the A-share market. However, the style of A-shares can go crazy very quickly. Many people cut their losses when the A-share market rises, directly withdrawing their money from QDII investment.</p><p>These three points—self-awareness, using long-term skills to combat short-term skills, and using slow skills to combat fast skills—are my advice to everyone. Even if the US stock market index is doing very well, if we cannot have a clear understanding of ourselves, I suggest that everyone should rather do what they are good at than follow the crowd.</p><p>In 2007 and 2008, when QDII was very popular, many people took advantage of the hype to subscribe to QDII and lost a lot of money, cutting their losses and getting out of the market.</p><p>Therefore, when subscribing to a QDII, you need to consider the investor's asset allocation philosophy and the assessment period. Once you understand yourself, it is always a good choice. Just like financial management, you take out money that you don't need urgently in the short term and continuously invest it regularly. Your purpose is very clear: to buy some assets that are not available in the A-share market, or even through the Hong Kong Stock Connect, assets that are not even available in the Hong Kong stock market, to buy the best global core assets, not just the core assets of A-shares and Hong Kong stocks in China. This is my sharing.</p><p><b>The era of global allocation has begun; we need to find the world's best companies.</b></p><p>Q: If we want to invest in QDII, is QDII a mandatory target in our basket? Is this a very important tool for allocating assets in our basket?</p><p>Zhang Yidong: Definitely, because the world has entered an era of low growth and low interest rates, a new era of mediocrity. At this stage, we need to find the best companies in the world. In 2016, I proposed the concept of Chinese core assets. In fact, this concept can be expanded to the whole world, whether it is Europe, Japan, or the United States. We need to find the best companies globally and continuously provide assets with core competitiveness and good cost-effectiveness.</p><p>When Chinese people's social wealth has accumulated to a certain stage, and our per capita GDP has now reached $10,000, based on the experience of Europe and the United States, this is precisely the beginning of the global allocation of wealth in the United States. Based on this experience, we should start considering regular fixed-amount investments in QDII (Qualified Domestic Investment Institutions) to gradually become familiar with such excellent managers. We should not put all our energy into it at once. If we put all our energy into it, we may become disheartened and heartbroken because of a fluctuation. It is best to take it slow, using long-term investments against short-term investments and slow investments against fast investments. However, the era of global allocation has already begun.</p>","source":"lsy1597111094582","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The United States buys time with money, and the whole world enters a \"new era of mediocrity\"</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe United States buys time with money, and the whole world enters a \"new era of mediocrity\"\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">投资作业本</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-05-27 19:44</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>This year is not a bear market for US stocks; a bear market is definitely a global systemic risk. \"The Federal Reserve's monetary policy framework has changed drastically since 2019; it has completely changed. Many investors, especially those in mainland China, now believe that the US stock market is going to collapse, that the US is doomed, that inflation in the US stock market is so high, and that the economy is so good. The US is simply overheating. No matter how you look at it, you feel that the Federal Reserve needs to accelerate its tightening pace. But in fact, this kind of thinking is using an 'old map,' that the Federal Reserve has been focusing on inflation for a long time, and that paying attention to inflation is better than anything else.\"</p><p>\"In the second half of the year, the US economy will show resilience. It's not that it will suddenly jump down from eighteen floors, but that it will maintain a range of fluctuations, and the overall marginal growth momentum will weaken. At this time, there is no need to implement stimulus policies. This is the first point. The dimension of US economic growth will slow down, and the month-on-month momentum will weaken.\"</p><p>\"In the second half of the year, the unemployment rate (in the United States) will ease... This round of decline in the unemployment rate in the United States has been relatively smooth, rather than rapid and steep... (The Federal Reserve) will still focus on employment. Before the United States achieves full employment and before the pressure of social conflicts eases, it will be difficult for the United States to recover all at once.\"</p><p>\"US inflation will not fall all at once in the second half of the year. The peak of inflation will be in the second quarter, but inflation may still hover at a high level in the second half of the year. The Federal Reserve needs to control the real interest rate in the US.\"</p><p>\"Against the backdrop of the current great power competition, we believe that the United States is buying time with money. This is a rewriting of the American Dream, which means that whether it is the US dollar, the US dollar exchange rate or the US long-term Treasury yield, they will ultimately obey the so-called new American Dream. Money is used to buy time, time for the US economic recovery and time for the expansion of US domestic demand. Recently, whether it is with South Korea or some other regions, the United States hopes that advanced manufacturing in these regions can come to the United States, buy time for manufacturing to return to the United States, and buy time for US technological innovation and upgrading.\"</p><p>\"Before the policy shift, it is actually predictable that the Federal Reserve will guide market expectations. Moreover, before the Fed's policy, there may be other policies, including taxes.\"</p><p>\"The Federal Reserve's policy is like the master valve of global liquidity, and we are unlikely to see this master valve tighten until at least the first quarter of this year or next year.\"</p><p>\"These companies, which are the backbone of the US stock index, are not expensive. They are not expensive globally, and they are not expensive compared to A-shares. On the contrary, relatively weaker and more thematic companies are more expensive.\"</p><p>\"The US stock market is definitely not a bear market. A bear market in the US stock market at this time is definitely a global systemic risk... As long as the US stock market is not a big bear market, it is a bull or structural market, which will bring opportunities to other markets around the world.\"</p><p>\"Don't think that the US stock index is very strong and ignore the professional and institutional characteristics of the US stock market. I have always said that we should try to focus on buying funds and investing in funds through fixed investment programs, so that professional investors can participate in the US stock market. Don't consider the US stock market with the mindset of speculating on A-shares or with the mindset of retail investors.\"</p><p>\"The world has entered an era of low growth and low interest rates, a new era of mediocrity. At this stage, we need to find the best companies in the world... The era of global allocation has begun.\"</p><p>On May 25, during a live broadcast of \"Cloud Conference | Global Capital Market Linkage, What is the Allocation Value of US Stocks?\" hosted by CBN, Zhang Yidong, Global Chief Strategist at Industrial Securities, shared the above views.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f539f1c96458b7ed999579cf5647d0ff\" tg-width=\"677\" tg-height=\"457\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>The following are the highlights of my investment workbook, which I would like to share with you:</p><p><b>The Federal Reserve's monetary policy framework has changed significantly, and we can no longer think with old-fashioned thinking.</b></p><p>Q: For the first time since the outbreak of the pandemic, Federal Reserve officials have discussed the possibility of tightening monetary policy. What does this mean for global markets?</p><p>Zhang Yidong: If people try to find the way forward using old maps, thinking that the Fed's tightening and bond purchases this time may lead to further tightening in the distant future, their approach is wrong. Conversely, if they conduct more in-depth research on the US stock market, they will find that the Fed's monetary policy framework has changed significantly since 2019 compared to before; it has completely changed.</p><p>Many investors, especially those in mainland China, believe that the US stock market is about to crash and the US is doomed. With inflation so high and the economy so good, the US is simply overheating. No matter how you look at it, you feel that the Federal Reserve needs to accelerate its tightening pace. But in fact, this kind of thinking is using an \"old map,\" believing that the Federal Reserve has been focusing on inflation for a long time and that focusing on inflation is better than anything else.</p><p><b>The US economy remains resilient in the second half of the year, and there is no need for stimulus policies at this time.</b></p><p>The US economy will show resilience in the second half of the year. It's not that it will suddenly jump down from eighteen floors, but rather that it will maintain a range of fluctuations, and the overall marginal growth momentum will weaken. At this point, there is no need for stimulus policies. This is the first point: the dimension of US economic growth will slow down, and the month-on-month momentum will weaken.</p><p>Secondly, in terms of the unemployment rate, the economic data for April was very good. The unemployment rate was 6.1%, slightly higher than in March, indicating a shift from simple to luxurious, and from luxurious to simple and difficult. Over the past year, the United States has experienced three rounds of massive monetary easing and bailouts. Low- and middle-income earners in the United States will take the bailout money to enjoy themselves first and spend it first. The US savings rate is still as high as 13.6%, while the historical average is 6-8%, which is its normal savings rate level. Therefore, they are not in a hurry to work or find jobs. Under these circumstances, the unemployment rate is relatively high.</p><p><b>The Fed's focus remains on employment.</b></p><p>In the second half of the year, the unemployment rate will ease because he needs to find work, and the savings rate will decline. However, the US economy won't be that bad in the second half of the year. He might be able to do odd jobs, which will make the decline in the US unemployment rate relatively smooth, rather than a rapid and steep one.</p><p>The Federal Reserve paid more attention to the unemployment rate, so much so that when the April inflation data was released, on May 12, US time, US inflation far exceeded expectations, causing an uproar in the market. At that time, many risky assets plummeted, triggering minor global turmoil that day.</p><p>However, several important figures with voting rights at the Federal Reserve, including the Fed Vice Chairman and another important official, stated that they saw the data and suggested that inflation caused by short-term transitional supply factors and employment factors were more worrying, so their focus was still on employment. Before the United States achieves full employment and before the pressure of social conflicts eases, it will be difficult for the United States to clean up its mess all at once.</p><p>US inflation peaked in the second quarter, and inflation hovered at a high level in the second half of the year.</p><p>Third, US inflation will not fall all at once in the second half of the year. Inflation will peak in the second quarter, but it may still hover at a high level in the second half of the year, requiring the Federal Reserve to control US real interest rates.</p><p><b>America buys time with money</b></p><p>Real interest rates are crucial to the recovery of the US economy, and in turn, they also play a guiding role in nominal interest rates. As you can see, everyone was very worried in mid-March, but in mid-March we clearly stated that US long-term Treasury yields would not pose a systemic risk. Against the backdrop of the current great power competition, we believe that the US is buying time with money, which is a rewriting of the American Dream. This means that whether it is the US dollar, the US dollar exchange rate, or US long-term Treasury yields, they will ultimately obey the so-called new American Dream. Money is used to buy time, time for the US economic recovery, time for the expansion of US domestic demand. Recently, whether in relations with South Korea or some other regions, the US hopes that advanced manufacturing in these regions can come to the US, buying time for manufacturing to return to the US and time for US technological innovation and upgrading.</p><p>Overall, under the current circumstances, neither employment nor inflation, nor the United States' need to enhance its competitiveness and maintain the sustainability of economic growth, are far from reaching a stage of contraction.</p><p>There are no systemic risks this year, and tightening market concerns have actually provided opportunities to invest in high-quality assets globally.</p><p>To summarize, my view is that everyone needs to see clearly the trump cards of the American elite and Powell's trump cards. Powell will be deciding on a second term next year, and under these circumstances, his focus will be more on the sustainability of economic growth and employment. That's why we say it's irreversible, and there are no systemic risks this year.</p><p>When the market is worried about tightening US policies, which will trigger global concerns, the resulting shock is a short-term disturbance. Instead, it gives us the opportunity to invest in higher-quality and more cost-effective assets globally. This is my thinking.</p><p>What impact would it have if the Federal Reserve's monetary policy shifted to tightening?</p><p>First, contraction will inevitably lead to adjustments in overvalued assets, even in a more drastic way.</p><p>Secondly, if it contracts, it will also lead to differentiation, especially for emerging markets. At that time, it is important to pay attention to the fact that the rebound of the US dollar will create a trend of suppression on commodities, which will put enormous pressure on emerging markets that rely mainly on midstream and upstream raw materials and minerals, and may even lead to debt risks and debt crises in emerging markets.</p><p>For US stocks, high valuations, especially some thematic junk stocks, will undergo a significant adjustment, and history will repeat itself. What should we focus on now? When will it actually turn?</p><p>It is unlikely that the Federal Reserve will tighten its policy this year or even in the first quarter of next year.</p><p>Before the policy shift, it was actually predictable that the Federal Reserve would guide market expectations. Moreover, before the Federal Reserve's policy, there may be other policies, including taxes.</p><p>In the second half of today, there will also be questions about whether tax increases will be approved by the State Taxation Administration, changes in taxes, bond issuance, and fiscal stimulus packages. Overall, we believe that this year and even the beginning of next year, we can basically see the Federal Reserve's trump cards clearly.</p><p>Frankly speaking, the global monetary system is still an international monetary system dominated by the US dollar. Therefore, the Federal Reserve's policy is equivalent to the master valve of global liquidity. At least in the first quarter of this year or even next year, it is difficult to see the master valve tighten.</p><p>It's even possible that the opposite could happen. If the US economy is weaker than people imagine in the second half of the year, the Federal Reserve might slightly amplify the overall valve. This would have the opposite effect, bringing better value-for-money assets worldwide, including some high-quality companies in the US stock market, European stocks, Chinese A-shares, Hong Kong stocks, and emerging market stocks.</p><p>It's okay to have a vague concept of the Fed's judgment. It's difficult to make a judgment about the general trend. It's difficult to be precise down to the month or week. We're taking it one step at a time. At least we can judge that the general trend is that we won't see the Fed tightening this year.</p><p><b>The slow and prolonged bull market in the US stock market is driven by the best companies.</b></p><p>Q: Can US stocks continue to improve? How long will it take for things to improve?</p><p>Zhang Yidong: Let's look at this from three perspectives: First, let's look at this from a structural perspective. The US stock market itself has three major indices. We often talk about the Dow Jones, Nasdaq, and S&P 500. Among these three indices, the best American companies, represented by Apple and Microsoft, mainly lead the index. Similarly, when we select the best companies in China to create an index, we are actually a super bull market.</p><p>Don't get the idea that everything in America is fine. In the US market, a large number of companies have launched, cleared, or delisted directly. A considerable number of companies have no trading volume and are like dead companies, suffering from a discount in liquidity. Therefore, in mature markets, it's truly a winner-takes-all situation. The best companies have reliable performance, and people give them valuations that match their profit growth, so we believe their sustainability is relatively long.</p><p>The US stock market itself is an index system, and its mechanism for effectively selecting the best companies is actually worth learning from. Moreover, its trading mechanism, whether it is T+0 or short selling, ensures its slow and long-term bull market, so that the best companies do not rise several times in a year or a year and a half, only to be Game over and not recover for several years.</p><p>From a structural perspective, the US stock market is driven by the best group of companies, which in turn benefit from its sound market mechanisms, trading mechanisms, and a series of market-oriented mechanisms, resulting in a very small bubble for the best group of companies.</p><p><b>Core companies in the US stock market are not expensive.</b></p><p>We often say that US-listed companies are expensive, but we can say that they are expensive from two perspectives:</p><p>First, the backbone of the US stock market, which can drive the US stock index upwards, is not expensive. It is not expensive globally, and it is not expensive compared to A-shares. On the contrary, those that are relatively weaker and more thematic are more expensive.</p><p>Secondly, because its interest rates are low, after rising for so long, the 10-year Treasury Bond yield in the US stock market is only 1.6 or 1.7. This is the first point. Looking at the structure of the US stock market, until the US substantially tightens the tap (substantial contraction), the path of the most outperforming companies in the US stock market leading the index is unlikely to end.</p><p><b>This year is not a bear market for US stocks; a bear market is definitely a global systemic risk.</b></p><p>Second, differences between countries. We believe that the US stock market is not in a bear market this year. At the end of last year, many people said they were not optimistic about the US stock market this year, but I said that the US stock market is definitely not in a bear market. If the US stock market is in a bear market at this time, it must be a global systemic risk. If the US stock market experiences a bear market this year, it will definitely be because the Federal Reserve has tightened its overall valve. This is a global systemic risk, and neither A-shares, emerging markets, nor European stock markets can withstand it.</p><p>On the second level, from a global perspective, if the United States leads a systemic tightening of the global monetary system, it may not necessarily mean that US stocks are the best performers. Since the beginning of the year, US stocks have underperformed European stock markets, and some of their indices have even underperformed relatively well-performing emerging market stock markets. As long as the US stock market is not a major bear market, but rather a bull or structural market, it presents opportunities for other global markets. This is a comparison between country markets and regional stock markets.</p><p>Third, style. Clearly, the style of US stocks this year has been that small and mid-cap stocks have outperformed large-cap stocks, and cyclical and value stocks have outperformed growth stocks. This has been the case since the beginning of the year. However, there may be changes, and the growth style may improve in the second half of the year.</p><p>From a long-term perspective, the United States is still an economy driven by technology and domestic demand. From a style perspective, its backbone is still these giants with technological innovation capabilities, which are driving the US stock market. This year, the Dow Jones, Russell 3000, and Russell 2000 have performed much better than the Nasdaq since the beginning of the year.</p><p>However, we see that US stocks are not rising and falling simultaneously; they are rising in a style, such as value stocks rising and growth stocks adjusting. Whether it's Chinese concept stocks or pure US stocks in the US, many growth-oriented stocks have actually adjusted by more than 30%-50% since the beginning of this year. Don't assume that the US stock index is very strong and ignore the professional and institutional characteristics of the US stock market. I've always said that we should focus on buying funds and investing in funds through regular fixed-amount investments, so that professional investors can participate in the US stock market. We shouldn't consider the US stock market with the mindset of speculating on A-shares or with the mindset of retail investors.</p><p><b>Three points to note when investing in QDII: Know yourself, use long-term strategies against short-term strategies, and use slow-term strategies</b></p><p>Q: What should I pay attention to when investing in QDII?</p><p>Zhang Yidong: QDII itself is a tool, a product, a product that helps enrich asset allocation. There are a few concerns:</p><p>First, understand yourself. Before understanding a product, first look at what you are like. Because not everyone can make money on certain products. For example, the products of some famous fund managers may have increased dozens of times in more than ten years, but it was useless. Holders sold them after a short while.</p><p>Some people say that buying QDII is like buying various A-share products. When I make a swing trade, I often end up losing money. Knowing yourself is very important. Your risk tolerance is different whether you should make a swing trade or just make a long-term allocation.</p><p>Second, focus on using long-term strategies to combat After buying, try to know that the QDII you are buying is in a relatively unfamiliar market outside your own circle of competence. You need to go through a relatively familiar process with the fund manager. You need to be truly professional and have a genuine understanding of the market. Recognizing that making money in the US stock market doesn't depend on timing, but on good, high-quality companies. Investing in companies when they offer suitable cost-effectiveness is ultimately a measure of value.</p><p>Third, fight fast with slow motion. Because people are interested in overseas markets, they often feel that the A-share market is hopeless and prefer to invest their money, as the returns are better than those in the A-share market. However, the style of A-shares can go crazy very quickly. Many people cut their losses when the A-share market rises, directly withdrawing their money from QDII investment.</p><p>These three points—self-awareness, using long-term skills to combat short-term skills, and using slow skills to combat fast skills—are my advice to everyone. Even if the US stock market index is doing very well, if we cannot have a clear understanding of ourselves, I suggest that everyone should rather do what they are good at than follow the crowd.</p><p>In 2007 and 2008, when QDII was very popular, many people took advantage of the hype to subscribe to QDII and lost a lot of money, cutting their losses and getting out of the market.</p><p>Therefore, when subscribing to a QDII, you need to consider the investor's asset allocation philosophy and the assessment period. Once you understand yourself, it is always a good choice. Just like financial management, you take out money that you don't need urgently in the short term and continuously invest it regularly. Your purpose is very clear: to buy some assets that are not available in the A-share market, or even through the Hong Kong Stock Connect, assets that are not even available in the Hong Kong stock market, to buy the best global core assets, not just the core assets of A-shares and Hong Kong stocks in China. This is my sharing.</p><p><b>The era of global allocation has begun; we need to find the world's best companies.</b></p><p>Q: If we want to invest in QDII, is QDII a mandatory target in our basket? Is this a very important tool for allocating assets in our basket?</p><p>Zhang Yidong: Definitely, because the world has entered an era of low growth and low interest rates, a new era of mediocrity. At this stage, we need to find the best companies in the world. In 2016, I proposed the concept of Chinese core assets. In fact, this concept can be expanded to the whole world, whether it is Europe, Japan, or the United States. We need to find the best companies globally and continuously provide assets with core competitiveness and good cost-effectiveness.</p><p>When Chinese people's social wealth has accumulated to a certain stage, and our per capita GDP has now reached $10,000, based on the experience of Europe and the United States, this is precisely the beginning of the global allocation of wealth in the United States. Based on this experience, we should start considering regular fixed-amount investments in QDII (Qualified Domestic Investment Institutions) to gradually become familiar with such excellent managers. We should not put all our energy into it at once. If we put all our energy into it, we may become disheartened and heartbroken because of a fluctuation. It is best to take it slow, using long-term investments against short-term investments and slow investments against fast investments. However, the era of global allocation has already begun.</p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzI0OTU4MTM3NQ==&mid=2247489839&idx=1&sn=bfa4c7de9db93cf496b1571b54d2223f&chksm=e98e037fdef98a691f1f72fec74fa81d0495e5508953175e31a96ce3ad949fe19ad0150a5e74&mpshare=1&scene=23&srcid=0527nkCwOi69oB7tUYWCJjNe&sharer_sharetime=1622111756938&sharer_shareid=ad9b2b8e01e45d9350b7cd98d4e88279#rd\">投资作业本</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/15e20574f8fb568333181d61bb200086","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzI0OTU4MTM3NQ==&mid=2247489839&idx=1&sn=bfa4c7de9db93cf496b1571b54d2223f&chksm=e98e037fdef98a691f1f72fec74fa81d0495e5508953175e31a96ce3ad949fe19ad0150a5e74&mpshare=1&scene=23&srcid=0527nkCwOi69oB7tUYWCJjNe&sharer_sharetime=1622111756938&sharer_shareid=ad9b2b8e01e45d9350b7cd98d4e88279#rd","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1171660212","content_text":"今年美股不是熊市，出现熊市肯定是全球性系统风险。“美联储的货币政策框架已经从2019年以后和以前大不一样，它已经完全的改变。现在很多投资者，特别是中国内地的投资者老是认为美股要崩了，美国要完蛋了，美股通胀这么高，经济又这么好，美国简直就是过热了，怎么想都觉得美联储要加快收紧的步伐，但事实上这种思考用的是一种“旧地图”，觉得美联储以前就盯住通胀，关注通胀胜于其他。”“下半年，美国经济会有一个韧性。不是说一下子从十八层楼向下跳，而是它会维持一个区间震荡，整个边际增长的动能会减弱，这个时候没有必要进行刺激政策，这是第一点，美国经济增长的维度会放缓，环比的动能会减弱。”“到了下半年，（美国）失业率的情况会缓解….. 美国这一轮失业率下行相对比较平滑，而不是快速的陡峭…..(美联储)他们的着重点还在于就业。美国实现充分就业之前，社会矛盾的压力缓解之前，美国覆水很难一下子收起来。”“美国下半年的通胀不会一下子下去，通胀的峰值在二季度，但是下半年通胀可能还在高位徘徊，需要美联储控制住美国的实际利率。”“在当前大国博弈的背景下，我们认为美国是用钱买时间，这是重新编了一个美国梦，意味着无论是美元、美元汇率还是美国长债利率最终都要服从于所谓新的美国梦，用钱来买时间，买美国经济复苏的时间，买美国内需扩张的时间，近期无论跟韩国还是一些区域，美国都希望这些区域的先进制造业能够到美国，买制造业回流美国的时间，买美国科技创新升级的时间。”“在政策转向之前，其实是可以预期的，美联储会引导市场的预期。而且在美联储的政策之前，可能还会有其他的政策，包括税收。”“美联储的政策相当于全球流动性的总阀门，这个总阀门至少今年乃至明年的一季度，我们还是很难看到收紧。”“能够推动美股指数向上涨的主心骨的这些公司并不贵，放在全球都不贵，跟A股相比也不算贵。反而相对弱的，比较偏题材性的比较贵。”“美股肯定不是熊市，这个时候美股出现熊市，一定是全球性的系统风险……只要美股不是一个大熊，它是一个偏牛或者偏结构型的市场，带来全球其他市场就有机会。”“不要以为美股指数很牛，忽略了美股市场的专业化、机构化的特征。我一直讲尽量用买基金、定投基金为主，让专业的投资者参与到美股，不要用炒A股的思路，散户化的思路考虑美股的市场。”“全球都进入到低增长、低利率的时代，是一个新平庸时代。这个阶段就要找全世界最优秀的公司……全球化配置的时代已经开始了。”5月25日，在第一财经举办的《云上会丨全球资本市场联动，美股配置价值几何？》的直播中，兴业证券全球首席策略分析师张忆东分享了上述观点。以下是投资作业本整理的精华内容，分享给大家：美联储货币政策框架已大大不同，不能用老式思维思考Q: 疫情爆发以来，美联储官员首次讨论收紧货币政策的可能性，这对全球市场意味着什么？张忆东：大家如果用老的地图试图找到未来的路，认为美联储这一次进行收缩、购债，遥远的未来有可能进一步收紧，方法是错的，反过来说，如果对于美股市场一直比较多的深入研究就会发现美联储的货币政策框架已经从2019年以后和以前大不一样，它已经完全的改变。现在很多投资者，特别是中国内地的投资者老是认为美股要崩了，美国要完蛋了，美股通胀这么高，经济又这么好，美国简直就是过热了，怎么想都觉得美联储要加快收紧的步伐，但事实上这种思考用的是一种“旧地图”，觉得美联储以前就盯住通胀，关注通胀胜于其他。下半年美国经济仍有韧性，此时无需进行刺激政策下半年，美国经济会有一个韧性。不是说一下子从十八层楼向下跳，而是它会维持一个区间震荡，整个边际增长的动能会减弱，这个时候没有必要进行刺激政策，这是第一点，美国经济增长的维度会放缓，环比的动能会减弱。第二，从失业率的维度来说，4月份经济数据非常好。失业率是6.1%，比3月份提高了一点，这就是由简入奢易，由奢入简难。过去一年的时间里，美国经历了3轮大放水，纾困，美国中低收入阶层会拿着纾困的钱先Happy，先花掉，美国的储蓄率依然高达13.6%，美国历史上的平均值是6—8%，这是它正常的储蓄率水平，所以不急于干活、找工作，这种情况下，失业率比较高。美联储重点还是关注就业到了下半年，失业率的情况会缓解，因为他要找工作，储蓄率下降。但是美国下半年的经济不会那么糟，他可能打打零工就OK了，从而使得美国这一轮失业率下行相对比较平滑，而不是快速的陡峭。美联储对于失业率的关注度更高，以至于当4月份的通胀数据出现之后，美国时间5月12号，美国通胀大超预期，市场一片哗然，当时很多风险资产暴跌，引发了那一天全球性的小小动荡。但是，立刻美联储有投票权的几个大人物，美联储的副主席包括另外一个重要的官员提出，他们看到数据，提出相比较短期过渡性的供给因素引发的通胀，就业的因素更令人担心，所以他们的着重点还在于就业。美国实现充分就业之前，社会矛盾的压力缓解之前，美国覆水很难一下子收起来。美国通胀峰值在二季度，下半年通胀高位徘徊第三，美国下半年的通胀不会一下子下去，通胀的峰值在二季度，但是下半年通胀可能还在高位徘徊，需要美联储控制住美国的实际利率。美国用钱买时间实际利率对美国经济的复苏非常重要，进而对于名义利率也有一个引导作用。你可以看到很明显，3月中旬的时候大家都很担心，但是3月中旬我们旗帜鲜明的提出美国长债收益率不会构成系统性风险，在当前大国博弈的背景下，我们认为美国是用钱买时间，这是重新编了一个美国梦，意味着无论是美元、美元汇率还是美国长债利率最终都要服从于所谓新的美国梦，用钱来买时间，买美国经济复苏的时间，买美国内需扩张的时间，近期无论跟韩国还是一些区域，美国都希望这些区域的先进制造业能够到美国，买制造业回流美国的时间，买美国科技创新升级的时间。总体来说，现在的状态下，无论是就业、通胀还是美国要增强它的竞争力，维持经济增长的持续性，都远不到收缩的阶段。今年没有系统性风险，市场担忧收紧反而给了全球布局优质资产的机会做一个总结，我的看法是大家要看清楚美国精英阶层的底牌，要看清楚鲍威尔的底牌，鲍威尔明年就要决定第二轮任期，在这种情况下，他的关注点更多在经济增长的持续性，就业的层面。所以我们说叫做覆水难收，今年没有系统性风险。当市场担心美国政策收紧，进而引发全球性担忧，这种导致的震荡是一个短期的扰动，反而给了我们在全球范围内布局更优质资产，性价比更好的资产的机会，这是我的思考。假如美联储货币政策转向收缩，会带来哪些影响？第一，收缩一定会带来高估值资产的调整，甚至是以一个比较激烈的方式调整。第二，如果收缩，也会带来分化，特别是对于新兴市场，那个时候要关注美元的反弹对于大宗商品形成一个趋势性的压制，进而那些以中上游原材料和矿产为主要支柱的新兴市场就形成了一个巨大的压力，甚至会导致新兴市场的债务风险、债务危机。对于美股而言，它里边的高估值，特别是有一些题材型的垃圾股也会有一个明显的调整，历史都会重演。我们现在要关注的是什么？它什么时候会真正的转。今年乃至明年一季度很难看到美联储政策收紧在政策转向之前，其实是可以预期的，美联储会引导市场的预期。而且在美联储的政策之前，可能还会有其他的政策，包括税收。今天下半年，也会有加税会不会被国税批准，税收的变化，以及发债，财政刺激方案。总体来说，我们认为今年乃至于明年的年初，我们基本上认为大家还可以看清楚美联储的底牌。坦率说，现在全球的货币体系依然是以美元为主导的国际货币体系，所以美联储的政策相当于全球流动性的总阀门，这个总阀门至少今年乃至明年的一季度，我们还是很难看到总阀门的收紧。甚至不排除反过来，如果下半年美国经济可能比大家想象中的弱，也有可能美联储的总阀门略微的放大一点，这会带来反过来的作用，带来全世界性价比更好的资产，包括美国股个别优质的公司，欧洲的，中国A股、中国港股，包括新兴市场的。对于美联储的判断有一个模糊的概念就OK，对大体趋势做一个判断，具体精确到月、周那很难，我们也是走一步看一步，至少我们能够判断大的趋势是今年看不到美联储收缩的动作。美股的慢牛、长牛是由最优秀的一批公司驱动的Q：美股还能继续向好吗？向好的时间有多长？张忆东：分三个方面来看这个事情：第一，从结构的角度来看这件事情。美股市场本身的结构，它有三大指数，我们动辄讲道琼斯、纳斯达克、标普，这三大指数里面主要就是苹果、微软为代表的美国最优秀的公司带着指数走。同样，我们把中国最优秀的公司筛出来做一个指数，其实我们也是超级长牛。你不要有一个想法，美国所有的都好。美国市场大量的公司推出了，清零了，直接退市了，有相当一批公司没有成交量，像死了一样，流动性折价。所以成熟市场真的是赢家通吃，最优秀的公司它的业绩靠谱，大家给他符合盈利增长相匹配的估值，所以我们认为它的持续性比较长。美股本身是指数编制，以及它能够有效的把最优秀的公司筛选出来的机制其实值得我们学习，而且它的交易机制，无论是T+0还是融券的机制，反而保证了它的慢牛，长牛，使得最优秀的公司不会是一年或者一年半涨了几倍，涨完了就Game over，好几年起不来了。从结构的角度来说，美股是最优秀的一批公司驱动的，而最优秀的公司又受益于它良好的市场机制、交易机制和市场一系列的市场化机制，使得最优秀的一批公司反而泡沫很小。美股主心骨公司并不贵我们动辄讲美股公司贵，贵从两个角度说：第一，单独拿出来美股的主心骨，能够推动美股指数向上涨的主心骨的这些公司并不贵，放在全球都不贵，跟A股相比也不算贵。反而相对弱的，比较偏题材性的比较贵。第二，因为它的利率低，涨了这么久，美股的十年期国债收益率只有1.6、1.7。这是第一点，从美股市场的结构来看在美国实质性地收紧水龙头（实质性收缩）之前，美股最牛的一批公司引领着指数走的路径还是看不到终止的。今年美股不是熊市，出现熊市肯定是全球性系统风险第二，国别之间的差异。我们认为今年美股不是熊市，去年年底，很多人说今年不看好美股，我说美股肯定不是熊市，这个时候美股出现熊市，一定是全球性的系统风险。如果今年美股出现熊市，肯定是美联储总阀门收紧了，那是全球性的系统性风险，无论是A股、新兴市场、欧洲的股市，都顶不住。第二个层面，从全球的角度来说，如果美国引领了全球货币体系不是一个系统性的收紧，不一定是美股最优秀，年初以来，美股跑输了欧洲股市，甚至它的有些指数比新兴市场相对优秀的股市表现得弱一点。只要美股不是一个大熊，它是一个偏牛或者偏结构型的市场，带来全球其他市场就有机会，这是国别市场和区域股市之间的比较。第三，风格。很明显，今年美股的风格是中小型的表现得比大型得好，周期和价值表现的比成长的风格好，这是从年初一直到现在。但是有可能会有所变化，下半年不排除成长的风格有所改善。从长期的角度来说，美国还是一个依靠科技驱动、内需驱动的经济体，从风格的角度来说，它的主心骨还是具有科技创新能力的这些巨头拖着美股走，今年的道琼斯，罗素3000、罗素2000，表现的比纳斯达克从年初到现在好很多。但是恰恰我们看到美股不是同涨同跌，它是一个风格涨，比如说价值涨，成长在调整。无论是中概股还是美股本地的纯美股，其实在今年从年初以来偏成长的很多都调了30%—50%以上，不要以为美股指数很牛，忽略了美股市场的专业化、机构化的特征。我一直讲尽量用买基金、定投基金为主，让专业的投资者参与到美股，不要用炒A股的思路，散户化的思路考虑美股的市场。投资QDII注意三点：认知自我、以长打短、以慢打快Q：投资QDII的时候需要注意什么？张忆东：QDII本身就是一种工具，是一种产品，有助于丰富资产配置的产品。有几个关注点：第一，认知自我。在认知产品之前，先看一看自己是什么样子的。因为并不是所有的人都能够在某些产品上赚钱，比如某些著名基金经理的产品可能十几年翻了几十倍，但没用，持有人拿了一会儿就卖掉了。有些人说买QDII就和买A股的各种产品一样，我做一个波段，往往就砸在手里面了。认知自我很重要，你的风险承受能力，究竟是择时做一个波段还是只是做一个长远的配置，这是不一样的。第二，关注以长打短。买了以后，尽量要知道你买的QDII是在自己能力圈以外，相对陌生的市场，对于基金管理人要有一个相对熟悉的过程，路遥知马力，真正要专业，真正对市场有认知。认知到在美股赚钱不是靠择时，而是靠好的公司，优质的公司，在它性价比合适的时候进行布局，其实还是对价值的衡量。第三，以慢打快。因为大家对海外市场感兴趣，往往是因为觉得A股没戏，喜欢把钱投出去，相比A股那边的收益率好一点。但是A股的风格一旦疯起来特别快。很多人在A股一旦起来的时候就割肉，直接把钱从QDII折腾出来。这三点，认知自我，以长打短，以慢打快是我对大家的建议。就算是美股市场指数走得很好，如果我们不能够对自我有清醒的认识，我建议大家宁可做自己擅长的事，不一定随大流。2007年、2008年，QDII非常火的时候，趁着热度认购QDII，很多人都亏了大钱，割肉出局。所以认购QDII，需要看投资者资产配置的理念和考核的期限，你要认知好自我之后，什么时候都是一个好的选择。就像理财一样，你拿出短期不需要急用的钱，不断的定期定投，你的目的很清晰，就是买一些A股没有的资产，甚至通过港股通，连港股都没有的资产，买最优秀的全球型的核心资产，不止是A股、港股中国的核心资产，这是我的分享。全球化配置时代已开启，要寻找全世界最优秀的公司Q：如果要投资QDII，QDII是不是我们这个篮子里面必须要选择的标的？是不是我们这个篮子配置资产很重要的一个抓手？张忆东：肯定是的，因为全球都进入到低增长、低利率的时代，是一个新平庸时代。这个阶段就要找全世界最优秀的公司，我在2016年提出中国核心资产这个理念，其实这个理念可以扩增到全世界，无论是欧洲、日本、美国，全球范围内寻找最优秀的公司，持续提供有核心竞争力，性价比不错的资产。当中国人的社会财富积累到了一定的阶段，现在我们的人均GDP到了1万美金，按照欧美的经验来看，恰恰是美国财富全球化配置的开端，按照这样一个经验来看，我们应该开始考虑定期定投QDII，慢慢熟悉这种优秀的管理人，不要一下子把全部的精力放上去，如果全部放上去，很可能因为一个波动灰了心，伤了心，最好慢慢来，以长打短，以慢打快，但是全球化配置的时代已经开始了。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":6662,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":342948246,"gmtCreate":1618173901885,"gmtModify":1704707048918,"author":{"id":"3536928846214760","authorId":"3536928846214760","name":"東海吉龍","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0ef8466588cf515f97a20c636e2be8a0","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3536928846214760","idStr":"3536928846214760"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"666","listText":"666","text":"666","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/342948246","repostId":"2126006034","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2126006034","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"美股研究社，一个专注研究美股的平台，专业的美股投资人都在这。想了解美国股市行情、美股开户、美股资讯、美股公司；想获得一手美股重磅信息；想加入美股交流社群，敬请关注我们吧。","home_visible":0,"media_name":"美股研究社","id":"1074069735","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e09c69c7ea1d4781a9de127f9b375dd6"},"pubTimestamp":1618049504,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2126006034?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-10 18:11","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Which of the three stocks favored by \"Sister Wood\" is the most worthy of investors' support?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2126006034","media":"美股研究社","summary":"下面是三支遭受重创的Cathie Wood股票，它们是目前特别值得买入的股票。","content":"<p>Even the best investors go through tough times. Cathie Wood, founder and CEO of Ark Investments, is one such example. The shares of the five major exchange-traded funds (ETFs) managed by Wood are well below their highs earlier this year.</p><p>However, the stock market correction provides a huge opportunity for other investors to buy shares of the best companies owned by the Ark ETF. Here are three hard-hit Cathie Wood stocks that are particularly worth buying right now.</p><p><b>Sea Limite (SE.US)</b></p><p>Sea Limited in Wood<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ARKF\">ARK Fintech Innovation ETF</a>Ranked fifth in China. It is the 10th largest holding of the ARK Next Generation Internet ETF. The company's share price has fallen more than 12% from its high in February.</p><p>Of course, the company announced a large loss in the fourth quarter in early March. However, the stock's decline was more related to investors withdrawing from growth stocks than to Sea's underlying business. In fact, the company's business is booming.</p><p>Sea's digital entertainment division is making a fortune from the success of Free Fire, the highest-grossing mobile game in Latin America and Southeast Asia for six consecutive quarters. This business is essentially subsidizing the company's loss-making divisions focused on digital finance and e-commerce.</p><p>However, I believe that Sea's long-term prospects are very favorable for all three companies. Free Fire remains a global mobile game giant. Sea's Shopee e-commerce platform is a leader in markets such as Southeast Asia and Indonesia, and continues to achieve strong revenue growth. The company's SeaMoney mobile wallet is also accelerating its development.</p><p>I hope Sea's bottom line will improve, and I hope its stock price will rebound well.</p><p><b>Square (SQ.US)</b></p><p>Wood's favorite stock is Square (NYSE:SQ). This stock is<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ARKF\">ARK Fintech Innovation ETF</a>It is the largest stock held and the second largest position in the ARK Innovation ETF and the ARK Next Generation Internet ETF. However, Square's stock price has fallen 11% from its February high.</p><p>As with Sea Limited, Square's pullback is primarily the result of market rotation. Despite the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the company's seller ecosystem, there were signs of improvement in the fourth quarter. The increase in vaccine supply foreshadows a stronger performance for the remainder of 2021.</p><p>Meanwhile, Square's cash app digital wallet remains a huge growth story for the company. In the fourth quarter of this year, the gross profit of cash applications surged 162% year-on-year. Square should be able to achieve greater growth by driving the use of related products and services, such as cash and debit cards.</p><p>In March of this year, Square achieved a significant milestone when its financial services division began banking operations. Under the protection of federally chartered banks, Square will be able to provide more financial services to its business customers. Over time, the fintech giant may expand its banking services.</p><p>In many ways, Square's efforts to disrupt the financial services industry are only just beginning. Its stock price still has a lot of room to rise.</p><p><b>Teladoc Health (TDOC.US)</b></p><p>In<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ARKK\">ARK Innovation ETF</a>Among the companies with the largest shareholdings, Teladoc Health's shareholdings are second only to Square. This leader in the virtual care industry is the fourth largest holding of the ARK Next Generation Internet ETF and ranks first in the ARK Genomic Revolution ETF. Although Wood likes Teladoc's stock, its share price has fallen by nearly 40% from its February high.</p><p>Institutional investors shifting funds away from growth stocks is one reason for Teladoc's poor performance. However, the company also expects revenue growth to slow in the fourth quarter of 2021. In addition,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon</a>Announced plans to enter the telemedicine market this summer.</p><p>My answer to all of this is simply to look at the long-term prospects of Teladoc. Virtual medicine is still in its early stages. McKinsey Consulting predicts that the U.S. virtual healthcare market will reach $250 billion annually after the pandemic ends. Teladoc's opportunities are not limited to the United States.</p><p>I believe, without a doubt, that this is a large enough market to support multiple winners. Teladoc's leading edge, market share (its customers currently account for more than 40% of Fortune 500 companies), and range of products and services give the company a solid competitive advantage.</p><p>In 2020, due to the pandemic, the demand for telemedicine has surged like never before, and it is entirely understandable that revenue growth will slow down. In the long run, Teladoc should be able to continue its strong growth.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Which of the three stocks favored by \"Sister Wood\" is the most worthy of investors' support?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhich of the three stocks favored by \"Sister Wood\" is the most worthy of investors' support?\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/e09c69c7ea1d4781a9de127f9b375dd6);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">美股研究社 </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-04-10 18:11</p>\n</div>\n</div>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Even the best investors go through tough times. Cathie Wood, founder and CEO of Ark Investments, is one such example. The shares of the five major exchange-traded funds (ETFs) managed by Wood are well below their highs earlier this year.</p><p>However, the stock market correction provides a huge opportunity for other investors to buy shares of the best companies owned by the Ark ETF. Here are three hard-hit Cathie Wood stocks that are particularly worth buying right now.</p><p><b>Sea Limite (SE.US)</b></p><p>Sea Limited in Wood<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ARKF\">ARK Fintech Innovation ETF</a>Ranked fifth in China. It is the 10th largest holding of the ARK Next Generation Internet ETF. The company's share price has fallen more than 12% from its high in February.</p><p>Of course, the company announced a large loss in the fourth quarter in early March. However, the stock's decline was more related to investors withdrawing from growth stocks than to Sea's underlying business. In fact, the company's business is booming.</p><p>Sea's digital entertainment division is making a fortune from the success of Free Fire, the highest-grossing mobile game in Latin America and Southeast Asia for six consecutive quarters. This business is essentially subsidizing the company's loss-making divisions focused on digital finance and e-commerce.</p><p>However, I believe that Sea's long-term prospects are very favorable for all three companies. Free Fire remains a global mobile game giant. Sea's Shopee e-commerce platform is a leader in markets such as Southeast Asia and Indonesia, and continues to achieve strong revenue growth. The company's SeaMoney mobile wallet is also accelerating its development.</p><p>I hope Sea's bottom line will improve, and I hope its stock price will rebound well.</p><p><b>Square (SQ.US)</b></p><p>Wood's favorite stock is Square (NYSE:SQ). This stock is<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ARKF\">ARK Fintech Innovation ETF</a>It is the largest stock held and the second largest position in the ARK Innovation ETF and the ARK Next Generation Internet ETF. However, Square's stock price has fallen 11% from its February high.</p><p>As with Sea Limited, Square's pullback is primarily the result of market rotation. Despite the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the company's seller ecosystem, there were signs of improvement in the fourth quarter. The increase in vaccine supply foreshadows a stronger performance for the remainder of 2021.</p><p>Meanwhile, Square's cash app digital wallet remains a huge growth story for the company. In the fourth quarter of this year, the gross profit of cash applications surged 162% year-on-year. Square should be able to achieve greater growth by driving the use of related products and services, such as cash and debit cards.</p><p>In March of this year, Square achieved a significant milestone when its financial services division began banking operations. Under the protection of federally chartered banks, Square will be able to provide more financial services to its business customers. Over time, the fintech giant may expand its banking services.</p><p>In many ways, Square's efforts to disrupt the financial services industry are only just beginning. Its stock price still has a lot of room to rise.</p><p><b>Teladoc Health (TDOC.US)</b></p><p>In<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ARKK\">ARK Innovation ETF</a>Among the companies with the largest shareholdings, Teladoc Health's shareholdings are second only to Square. This leader in the virtual care industry is the fourth largest holding of the ARK Next Generation Internet ETF and ranks first in the ARK Genomic Revolution ETF. Although Wood likes Teladoc's stock, its share price has fallen by nearly 40% from its February high.</p><p>Institutional investors shifting funds away from growth stocks is one reason for Teladoc's poor performance. However, the company also expects revenue growth to slow in the fourth quarter of 2021. In addition,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon</a>Announced plans to enter the telemedicine market this summer.</p><p>My answer to all of this is simply to look at the long-term prospects of Teladoc. Virtual medicine is still in its early stages. McKinsey Consulting predicts that the U.S. virtual healthcare market will reach $250 billion annually after the pandemic ends. Teladoc's opportunities are not limited to the United States.</p><p>I believe, without a doubt, that this is a large enough market to support multiple winners. Teladoc's leading edge, market share (its customers currently account for more than 40% of Fortune 500 companies), and range of products and services give the company a solid competitive advantage.</p><p>In 2020, due to the pandemic, the demand for telemedicine has surged like never before, and it is entirely understandable that revenue growth will slow down. In the long run, Teladoc should be able to continue its strong growth.</p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"http://gimg2.baidu.com/image_search/src=http%3A%2F%2Finews.gtimg.com%2Fnewsapp_bt%2F0%2F13178222039%2F641&refer=http%3A%2F%2Finews.gtimg.com&app=2002&size=f9999,10000&q=a80&n=0&g=0n&fmt=jpeg?sec=1619929481&t=d215d79061ca1426fcf3fc9ef6561e9f","relate_stocks":{"SE":"Sea Ltd","TDOC":"Teladoc Health Inc.","ARKK":"ARK Innovation ETF"},"is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2126006034","content_text":"即使是最好的投资者也会经历艰难时期。方舟投资公司创始人兼首席执行官Cathie  Wood就是这样。Wood管理的五大交易所交易基金(ETFs)的股价远低于今年早些时候的高点。然而，股市回调为其他投资者提供了巨大的机会，让他们可以买进方舟ETF所拥有的最好公司的股票。下面是三支遭受重创的Cathie  Wood股票，它们是目前特别值得买入的股票。Sea Limite（SE.US）Sea Limited 在Wood的ARK Fintech Innovation ETF中排名第五。它是ARK Next  Generation Internet ETF的第10大持仓。该公司股价已较2月份创下的高点下跌逾12%。当然，该公司在3月初宣布了第四季度的大幅亏损。然而，该股的下跌更多地与投资者从成长型股票中撤出有关，而不是与Sea的基础业务有关。实际上，公司的业务正在蓬勃发展。Sea的数字娱乐部门正从《Free Fire》的成功中赚得盆满钵满，《Free  Fire》是拉丁美洲和东南亚连续6个季度营收最高的手机游戏。这项业务实质上是在补贴该公司专注于数字金融和电子商务的亏损部门。然而，我认为Sea的长期前景对这三项企业都非常有利。Free  Fire仍然是全球手机游戏巨头。Sea的Shopee电子商务平台在东南亚、印度尼西亚等市场处于领先地位，并持续实现强劲的收入增长。该公司的SeaMoney移动钱包也在加速发展。我希望Sea的底线会有所改善，并且我希望它的股价能很好地反弹。Square（SQ.US）Wood最喜欢的股票莫过于Square(NYSE:SQ)。该股是ARK Fintech Innovation ETF持有的最大股票，也是ARK  Innovation ETF和ARK Next Generation Internet  ETF的第二大头寸。但Square的股价较2月份的高点下跌了11%。与Sea  Limited的情况一样，Square的回调主要是市场轮转的结果。尽管该公司的卖家生态系统受到了COVID-19大流行的负面影响，但第四季度出现了改善的迹象。疫苗供应的增加预示着2021年剩余时间的表现将更加强劲。与此同时，Square的现金应用数字钱包仍然是该公司的一个巨大增长故事。今年第四季度，现金应用毛利润同比飙升162%。通过推动相关产品和服务(如现金卡和借记卡)的使用，Square应该能够实现更大的增长。今年3月，随着Square金融服务部门开始银行业务，该公司实现了一个重要的里程碑。在联邦特许银行的保护下，Square将能够为其商业客户提供更多的金融服务。随着时间的推移，这家金融科技巨头可能会扩大其银行服务。从很多方面来看，Square在颠覆金融服务业方面的努力才刚刚起步。它的股价还有很大的上涨空间。Teladoc Health（TDOC.US）在ARK Innovation ETF持股最多的公司中，Teladoc  Health的持股量仅次于Square。这家虚拟护理行业的领军企业是ARK Next Generation Internet  ETF的第四大持仓，在ARK Genomic Revolution  ETF位列第一。尽管Wood很喜欢Teladoc的股票，但其股价已从2月份的高点下跌了近40%。机构投资者将资金从成长型股票上转移，是Teladoc表现不佳的一个原因。然而，该公司也预计2021年第四季度的收入增长将放缓。此外，亚马逊宣布计划于今年夏天进军远程医疗市场。对于这一切，我的回答只是着眼于Teladoc的长期前景。虚拟医疗仍处于早期阶段。McKinsey咨询公司预测，疫情结束后，美国虚拟医疗市场每年将达到2500亿美元。Teladoc的机会也不仅仅局限于美国。我认为，毫无疑问，这是一个足够大的市场，足以支持多个赢家。Teladoc的领先优势、市场占有率(目前其客户占《财富》500强企业的40%以上)，以及产品和服务的范围，使公司具有坚实的竞争优势。2020年，由于大流行，远程医疗需求前所未有地激增，收入增长将有所放缓，这是完全可以理解的。而从长远来看，Teladoc应该能够持续强劲增长。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SE":0.9,"TDOC":0.9,"SQ":0.9,"ARKK":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1620,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}