Jefflau749 personal page - To The Moon

Jefflau749

Jefflau749

No personal profile

462Follow

7Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2021-08-13

$Asia Broadband, Inc.(AABB)$good

2021-07-23

ya XD

Tesla has partnered with a giant to address its "biggest concern" regarding battery production expansion.

2021-06-21

?

Uqhui passed the Hong Kong Stock Exchange hearing, with revenue exceeding HK$2.8 billion in 2020.

2021-06-16

?

Morgan Stanley predicts that inflation expectations may have peaked. With shrinking balance sheet approaching, how should one invest?

2021-06-12

WOW

Tiger Brokers helped BOSS Zhipin list on Nasdaq, which opened 75% higher on its first day of trading.

2021-07-03

yo

The Federal Reserve revealed that Powell had a "private chat" with the Coinbase CEO in May.

2021-06-23

?

Foxconn responds to new iPhone mass production as early as the end of August: No comment.

2021-05-31

?

What does a weak start and a continuously weakening dollar mean for US stocks?

2021-05-15

?

Economists have raised their US inflation forecasts for the coming year across the board.

2022-11-14

$老虎证券(TIGR)$ ya

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3576195246415673","uuid":"3576195246415673","gmtCreate":1613456613121,"gmtModify":1613735106622,"name":"Jefflau749","pinyin":"jefflau749","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3b16bea38b728770eeacee83d0ca1b56","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":7,"headSize":462,"tweetSize":215,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":3,"name":"书生虎","nameTw":"書生虎","represent":"努力向上","factor":"发布10条非转发主帖,其中5条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-4","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Tiger Star","description":"Join the tiger community for 2000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dddf24b906c7011de2617d4fb3f76987","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/53d58ad32c97254c6f74db8b97e6ec49","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6304700d92ad91c7a33e2e92ec32ecc1","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2026.08.10","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001,"isScarce":0,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-2","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"Executive Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $300,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9d20b23f1b6335407f882bc5c2ad12c0","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ada3b4533518ace8404a3f6dd192bd29","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/177f283ba21d1c077054dac07f88f3bd","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2026.04.28","exceedPercentage":"80.92%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101,"isScarce":0,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-2","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Master Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 100","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad22cfbe2d05aa393b18e9226e4b0307","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/36702e6ff3ffe46acafee66cc85273ca","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d52eb88fa385cf5abe2616ed63781765","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.28","exceedPercentage":"80.71%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100,"isScarce":0,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102,"isScarce":0,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100,"isScarce":0,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0}],"userBadgeCount":5,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"hot","tweets":[{"id":9955894656,"gmtCreate":1675317757976,"gmtModify":1676538992503,"author":{"id":"3576195246415673","authorId":"3576195246415673","name":"Jefflau749","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3b16bea38b728770eeacee83d0ca1b56","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576195246415673","authorIdStr":"3576195246415673"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"ya","listText":"ya","text":"ya","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9955894656","repostId":"1138331498","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1138331498","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1675298634,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1138331498?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-02-02 08:43","market":"sg","language":"en","title":"Singapore Stocks to Watch: FLCT, Oxley, Keppel Pacific Oak US Reit, Quantum Healthcare","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1138331498","media":"Business Times","summary":"THE following companies saw new developments that may affect trading of their securities on Thursday","content":"<div>\n<p>THE following companies saw new developments that may affect trading of their securities on Thursday (Feb 2):FRASERS Logistics & Commercial Trust recorded over 239,500 square metres (sq m) of leasing ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/companies-markets/stocks-watch-flct-oxley-keppel-pacific-oak-us-reit-quantum-healthcare\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"lsy1607307803821","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Singapore Stocks to Watch: FLCT, Oxley, Keppel Pacific Oak US Reit, Quantum Healthcare</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSingapore Stocks to Watch: FLCT, Oxley, Keppel Pacific Oak US Reit, Quantum Healthcare\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-02-02 08:43 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/companies-markets/stocks-watch-flct-oxley-keppel-pacific-oak-us-reit-quantum-healthcare><strong>Business Times</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>THE following companies saw new developments that may affect trading of their securities on Thursday (Feb 2):FRASERS Logistics & Commercial Trust recorded over 239,500 square metres (sq m) of leasing ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/companies-markets/stocks-watch-flct-oxley-keppel-pacific-oak-us-reit-quantum-healthcare\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"5UX.SI":"豪利","BUOU.SI":"星狮物流工业信托","CMOU.SI":"KOREReitUSD","V8Y.SI":"康敦医疗"},"source_url":"https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/companies-markets/stocks-watch-flct-oxley-keppel-pacific-oak-us-reit-quantum-healthcare","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1138331498","content_text":"THE following companies saw new developments that may affect trading of their securities on Thursday (Feb 2):FRASERS Logistics & Commercial Trust recorded over 239,500 square metres (sq m) of leasing across its portfolio for its first quarter ended Dec 31, 2022, the real estate investment trust’s (Reit) manager said in a Wednesday (Feb 1) business update.The Reit maintained a 100 per cent occupancy for its logistics and industrial (L&I) portfolio, while its commercial portfolio recorded an 89.8 per cent occupancy rate. Overall occupancy came in at 95.9 per cent.Mainboard-listed Oxley Holdings reported on Wednesday (Feb 1) a sharp decline in net profit for its first half on the back of lower revenue and higher finance costs.Net profit for the six-month period ended Dec 31, 2022 fell to S$277,000 from S$23.5 million in the corresponding period a year ago.The group said in the bourse filing that the lower profits were due to “lower revenue streams coupled with higher finance costs resulting from rising interest rates and lower mark-to-market fair-value gain on derivative financial instruments”.THE manager of Keppel Pacific Oak US Reit said large-scale layoffs amid a tech sector slowdown are not a major concern for its portfolio – and might even be viewed as “somewhat positive” for the US office-focused real estate investment trust (Reit).“When you look at the layoffs for these companies in Bellevue and Redmond and compare that to what their hiring has been over the last several years, you will find that it has been just a fraction of what their hiring had been,” said David Snyder, chief executive of the Reit manager, at a briefing on Wednesday (Feb 1) following its FY2022 results announcement.Quantum Healthcare, on Feb 2, announced that it has proposed to acquire the businesses of three clinics operating under the Dental Hub Group.The acquisition was scaled down from theinitial acquisition of six clinicsunder the Dental Hub Group.The three clinics under the acquisition are located at Alexandra Road, Bedok North and Choa Chua Kang. The previous agreement included other clinics that were located in Jurong West, Telok Blangah Crescent and West Coast Road. According to Quantum Healthcare, this is due to several factors such as the existing market conditions, the clinics’ financial performance, as well as the location of the clinics.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"CMOU.SI":0.9,"BUOU.SI":0.9,"5UX.SI":0.9,"V8Y.SI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4671,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9955894837,"gmtCreate":1675317716529,"gmtModify":1676538992495,"author":{"id":"3576195246415673","authorId":"3576195246415673","name":"Jefflau749","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3b16bea38b728770eeacee83d0ca1b56","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576195246415673","authorIdStr":"3576195246415673"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"ya","listText":"ya","text":"ya","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9955894837","repostId":"1144650848","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4600,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9969692003,"gmtCreate":1668421088003,"gmtModify":1676538054023,"author":{"id":"3576195246415673","authorId":"3576195246415673","name":"Jefflau749","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3b16bea38b728770eeacee83d0ca1b56","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576195246415673","authorIdStr":"3576195246415673"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/CLM\">$Cornerstone Strategic Value Fund(CLM)$ &nbsp;</a>ya","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/CLM\">$Cornerstone Strategic Value Fund(CLM)$ &nbsp;</a>ya","text":"$Cornerstone Strategic Value Fund(CLM)$ ya","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/40d0545f72bc49a80eab4e2b46927636","width":"1080","height":"2266"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9969692003","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4654,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9969696444,"gmtCreate":1668421068588,"gmtModify":1676538054022,"author":{"id":"3576195246415673","authorId":"3576195246415673","name":"Jefflau749","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3b16bea38b728770eeacee83d0ca1b56","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576195246415673","authorIdStr":"3576195246415673"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/TIGR\">$老虎证券(TIGR)$ &nbsp;</a>ya","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/TIGR\">$老虎证券(TIGR)$ &nbsp;</a>ya","text":"$老虎证券(TIGR)$ ya","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/33faa7bf44fa7209d11e62daa206ed23","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9969696444","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":6251,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9912570035,"gmtCreate":1664863260627,"gmtModify":1676537520880,"author":{"id":"3576195246415673","authorId":"3576195246415673","name":"Jefflau749","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3b16bea38b728770eeacee83d0ca1b56","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576195246415673","authorIdStr":"3576195246415673"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"ya","listText":"ya","text":"ya","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9912570035","repostId":"1185863834","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3930,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9912950969,"gmtCreate":1664751359551,"gmtModify":1676537500398,"author":{"id":"3576195246415673","authorId":"3576195246415673","name":"Jefflau749","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3b16bea38b728770eeacee83d0ca1b56","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576195246415673","authorIdStr":"3576195246415673"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AITX\">$Artificial Intelligence Technology Solutions Inc.(AITX)$</a>U","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AITX\">$Artificial Intelligence Technology Solutions Inc.(AITX)$</a>U","text":"$Artificial Intelligence Technology Solutions Inc.(AITX)$U","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/0739bbd9510f43bdc11bde975f59a1aa","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9912950969","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":5383,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9912950005,"gmtCreate":1664751332208,"gmtModify":1676537500397,"author":{"id":"3576195246415673","authorId":"3576195246415673","name":"Jefflau749","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3b16bea38b728770eeacee83d0ca1b56","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576195246415673","authorIdStr":"3576195246415673"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AITX\">$Artificial Intelligence Technology Solutions Inc.(AITX)$</a>ya","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AITX\">$Artificial Intelligence Technology Solutions Inc.(AITX)$</a>ya","text":"$Artificial Intelligence Technology Solutions Inc.(AITX)$ya","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/0739bbd9510f43bdc11bde975f59a1aa","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9912950005","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":5201,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9909019162,"gmtCreate":1658791730656,"gmtModify":1676536206553,"author":{"id":"3576195246415673","authorId":"3576195246415673","name":"Jefflau749","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3b16bea38b728770eeacee83d0ca1b56","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576195246415673","authorIdStr":"3576195246415673"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"ya","listText":"ya","text":"ya","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9909019162","repostId":"1100128143","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1100128143","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1658756746,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1100128143?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-07-25 21:45","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Is the \"Minsky\" moment for European debt approaching? This time is different.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1100128143","media":"李美岑投资策略","summary":"欧央行加入全球紧缩潮，欧债魅影缠绕意大利。为了阻止通胀和欧元走势进一步恶化，欧央行于7月21日晚超预期加息50BP，欧元区告别为期八年的负利率时代，后续9月、10月以及12月都存在继续收水的可能。作为","content":"<p><html><head></head><body><b>The European Central Bank has joined the global tightening wave, and the specter of European debt looms over Italy.</b>To prevent inflation and the euro from deteriorating further, the European Central Bank raised rate hike by 50 basis points on the evening of July 21, exceeding expectations. The Eurozone bid farewell to an eight-year era of negative interest rates, and there is a possibility of further tightening in September, October, and December. As one of the PIIGS countries with a heavy debt burden, Italy is most at risk: 1) Since 2019, its debt has continued to grow rapidly, currently accounting for nearly 60% of the PIIGS countries; 2) The economic situation is also deteriorating. The new government took office in 2018 but did not bring about economic improvement. Since 2019, GDP growth has continued to decline to 0%. 3) Rampant populism and increasing inflationary pressures have both led to a decline in economic stability. At the end of 2020, Italy's unemployment rate reached 9.15%. Following the ECB's announcement of rate hike, the yield on Italy's 10-year Treasury Bond immediately surged to 4.14%, and the interest rate spread between Germany and Italy continued to widen to around 236 basis points, gradually approaching the level seen during the 2010 European debt crisis.</p><p><b>Historically, credit rating downgrades and ECB rate hike have been major drivers of the escalating European debt crisis.</b>If we take the performance of Greek and Portuguese 10-year Treasury Bond yields during the European debt crisis as an example, after four rounds of sovereign credit rating downgrades and two rounds of ECB rate hike, the 10-year Treasury Bond in both countries jumped by 120-160 basis points, which is the \"mastermind behind the intensification of liquidity runs.\" In fact, when Greece announced its fiscal problems at the end of September 2010, the yield on the Greek 10-year Treasury Bond had jumped by only 20 basis points, far less than during the downgrade. Furthermore, core European countries, represented by Germany, did not provide timely assistance and did not begin to establish an EU crisis management mechanism until mid-2010, which led to the liquidity run caused by European debt spreading from peripheral countries to core countries, represented by France.</p><p><b>Short-term risks are controllable, but in the long run, the effectiveness of the ECB's TPI implementation is of paramount importance. Pay attention to liquidity and credit indicator early warnings.</b>The five PIIGS countries had a total outstanding debt of approximately €350 billion in 2022, compared to the current available funds of approximately €360 billion in the European Stability Mechanism (ESM), indicating that short-term risks are temporarily under control. However, during the debt repayment peak in 2023, the five PIIGS countries had approximately 561.3 billion euros due, of which Italy accounted for 63%, representing a huge amount of debt repayment. Although the currently launched TPI targeted bond purchase instrument does not have a purchase limit, the specific implementation details are still relatively vague. If core countries such as Germany and France struggle to survive due to economic problems, the effectiveness of the ECB's bailout may be greatly reduced, and the European debt problem will also face uncertainty. Since the European debt problem is essentially caused by credit defaults and liquidity runs, we will continue to pay attention to liquidity indicators (LIBOR-OIS spread) and credit indicators (credit default swap rate CDS and German-Italian 10-year Treasury Bond spread).</p><p><b>The European debt problem is a \"crisis coexisting\" for my country.</b>On the economic front, the EU is my country's second-largest trading partner. The pressure on the European economy may lead to a slowdown in my country's import and export growth. Under the impact of the last round of European debt, my country's export growth rate fell from 26.42% to 4.43%, and its import growth rate fell from 32.99% to 1.39%. On the other hand, the economic pressure brought about by the European debt crisis may increase the EU's trade dependence on my country, and attention should be paid to the possibility of restarting the China-EU agreement in the future. On the financial front, the escalation of the European debt crisis will trigger a \"risk-off\" mode for global financial assets, and the A-share market will not be immune in the short term. However, in the long run, with the replacement of the RMB and the divergence in fundamentals, the Chinese stock, bond, and foreign exchange markets are expected to develop independent trends.</p><p><b>Risk warning: Geopolitical crisis; Overseas rate hike exceeded expectations; The spread of the epidemic exceeded expectations.</b></p><p><b>text</b></p><p><b>1. The European Central Bank joins the global tightening wave, raising concerns about a European debt default.</b></p><p><b>1.1 Inflationary pressures repeatedly reach new highs, making the \"era of negative interest rates\" in the Eurozone a thing of the past.</b></p><p><b>The rise in oil prices triggered by the Russia-Ukraine conflict has led to a record high in inflation in the Eurozone, and the huge trade deficit has also caused the euro to fall to a 20-year low.</b>About 30% of the EU's oil imports come from Russia. Following supply chain strains caused by the Russia-Ukraine conflict at the beginning of the year and the partial oil embargo imposed on Russia by the US and Europe in May, the EU's crude oil imports from Russia have decreased by 20% compared to last year, and the supply-demand gap continues to widen. The current inflation rate in the Eurozone has reached 8.6%, a record high since its inception; The core CPI, excluding factors such as energy and food, was 3.7%, which also demonstrates the significant impact of energy prices on the Eurozone. Driven by rising import costs and weak external demand due to energy prices, the Eurozone has experienced its largest trade deficit since its inception (32.4 billion euros). Even Germany, the \"locomotive\" of the European economy, experienced its first trade deficit in 30 years in May.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ae99577318ca9108e9ff778ed2b142f7\" tg-width=\"623\" tg-height=\"481\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ef865d7c8ef48b331a4ab89a4bc5492b\" tg-width=\"622\" tg-height=\"481\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>To prevent inflation and the euro's performance from deteriorating further, the European Central Bank joined the global \"water withdrawal model,\" marking the end of an eight-year era of negative interest rates in the Eurozone.</b>Since its establishment in 1998, the European Central Bank has adjusted its monetary policy with the inflation rate as the core variable. In July 2021, the European Central Bank adjusted its monetary policy strategy, changing the monetary policy target from \"below but close to 2%\" to a symmetrical target of 2%. The Eurozone's inflation rate has now far exceeded the 2% target. Based on this, the European Central Bank announced a 50 basis point rate hike on the evening of July 21, ending an eight-year period of negative interest rates in the Eurozone before the third quarter. In addition, boosting the euro exchange rate is also one of the ECB's objectives in considering rate hike. Currently, due to the huge trade deficit, the euro has fallen below 1:1 against the dollar, a new low in 20 years, while the euro jumped 90 points against the dollar after the ECB rate hike 50 basis points.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5c1f314ac60faf81f63dc2224fdda9e6\" tg-width=\"948\" tg-height=\"638\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>1.2 rate hike pushes up debt costs, and the specter of European debt looms over Italy.</b></p><p><b>Debt levels in European countries have continued to rise since the 2010 European debt crisis, and this rate hike may further trigger the risk of default in peripheral countries by pushing up borrowing costs.</b>Taking the \"PIIG countries\" as an example, their current debt burden has long exceeded the level during the 2010 European debt crisis. Greece's national debt-to-GDP ratio is close to 200%, followed by Italy, Spain, and Portugal, which fluctuate around 120% of GDP. After the ECB initiated its first rate hike in July, there is a possibility that it will continue to tighten monetary policy in September, October and December. In the future, debt repayment interest rates in Eurozone countries will jump non-linearly, and the rate hike plan will expose heavily indebted countries to the potential risk of debt crises due to rising borrowing costs.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aec821604531a0bf44d93798410bbbda\" tg-width=\"621\" tg-height=\"472\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/55ab61b0445fde666357d205d28e915a\" tg-width=\"621\" tg-height=\"478\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>Italy may be the most dangerous \"flammable commodity\" in this European debt crisis.</b>Since 2019, Italy's debt has continued to grow rapidly, with outstanding debt exceeding 2 trillion euros over the next 10 years, accounting for nearly 60% of the five IPIC countries. Meanwhile, the economic situation is also deteriorating. The new government took office in 2018 but did not bring about economic improvement. In 2019, GDP growth continued to decline to 0%. Subsequently, the impact of the pandemic on the service sector also severely damaged the Italian economy. In addition, rampant populism and increasing inflationary pressures have both led to a decline in economic stability. At the end of 2020, Italy's unemployment rate reached 9.15%. After the European Central Bank announced its rate hike, the market generally worried that Italy would become the first \"bomb\" in this European debt default. The yield on Italy's 10-year Treasury Bond immediately soared to 4.14%, and the interest rate spread between Germany and Italy continued to widen to around 236 basis points, gradually approaching the level during the 2010 European debt crisis.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/352a1e10163f43bc57f2ee2696fef298\" tg-width=\"622\" tg-height=\"453\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e65ad6e7d00387f27f0f68e16301b7f5\" tg-width=\"623\" tg-height=\"460\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>2. The essence of the European debt crisis is a liquidity run in the entire Eurozone.</b></p><p><b>The European debt crisis is a derivative of the 2008 subprime mortgage crisis.</b>Southern Europe, with its weak endogenous growth, has long maintained a \"false prosperity\" in its economy through real estate and tourism under an economic structure with a hollowed-out manufacturing sector. The subprime mortgage crisis led to a sharp decline in real estate and tourism, cutting off Southern Europe's sources of income. Banks in countries such as Ireland and Spain have had to seek government assistance due to large amounts of bad real estate debt. Taking Ireland as an example, the local government injected at least 70 billion euros into the financial system, more than half of the GDP at the time. This led to the government being unable to borrow under the subsequent impact of European debt and having to seek help from the IMF.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/787d43a12dcb17ac7b010e11444e8d07\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"522\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>2.1. Against the backdrop of cross-holdings of Treasury Bond within the Eurozone, the rating downgrade became the trigger for the \"fiery conflict\".</b></p><p><b>The 2008 subprime mortgage crisis pushed Greece to a \"dead end,\" and the downgrade of Greece's rating was the first \"domino\" that triggered the European debt crisis.</b>After the 2008 subprime mortgage crisis, Greece, which was highly dependent on foreign investment, could no longer enjoy the economic dividends brought by exports and real estate. At the same time, since the ECB controls the monetary and exchange rate, Greece cannot stimulate the economy through independent monetary easing or currency devaluation, and can only choose to engage in massive Treasury Bond and expand fiscal spending. In early October 2009, the newly appointed Greek Finance Minister announced that the previous government's debt had been falsified. In fact, at that time, the fiscal deficit and public debt accounted for as much as 12.7% and 113% of GDP, respectively, far exceeding the 3% and 60% stipulated by the EU. In December, the three major rating agencies downgraded Greece's sovereign credit rating and gave it a negative outlook, directly leading to a surge in Greece's 10-year Treasury Bond, a significant widening of the interest rate spread with Germany, and panic in the market.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a918d6455be7c166b2c650eede522954\" tg-width=\"619\" tg-height=\"504\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/be57e1656f3a830e584216fc4737818a\" tg-width=\"623\" tg-height=\"477\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>The successive defaults of Portugal, Ireland, Spain, and Italy have gradually shifted the debt crisis from peripheral countries of the Eurozone to core countries.</b>The defaults of the \"PIGS\" countries differed. Portugal followed Greece's lead and increased its real fiscal deficit to 8%. The market was worried that it would not be able to safely weather the upcoming debt repayment peak. Portugal's 10-year Treasury Bond once approached 14.2% from 3.5%. For Ireland, the real estate bubble was the \"originator\". The 2008 subprime mortgage crisis impacted the real estate markets in Europe and the United States. In order to save the five major banks that were about to go bankrupt, the Irish government set a fiscal deficit ratio as high as 32% in 2010, public debt as a percentage of GDP as high as 100%, and its debt pressure surpassed that of Greece. The country's 10-year Treasury Bond soared to 9%. In October 2011, France, the core country of the Eurozone, was...<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MCO\">Moody's</a>The latter pointed out that France has the weakest debt performance among AAA-rated countries and its sovereign debt situation continues to deteriorate. Subsequently, Italy's public debt ratio climbed to 120%, second only to Greece, and rating agencies successively downgraded its sovereign rating. With Italy, France, and Spain accounting for as much as 55% of the Eurozone's Treasury Bond market, far exceeding that of Greece, Ireland, and Portugal (combined at only 7%), the European debt problem had evolved from a localized shock into a crisis for the entire Eurozone by the end of 2011.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5c9032ac6c07f356abceccf84c92b758\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"553\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>At the same time, the European debt crisis has escalated from sovereign states to the level of commercial banks throughout the Eurozone.</b>Eurozone commercial banks hold a large amount of Greek Treasury Bond, with French, German, British, and Portuguese commercial banks alone accounting for more than one-third of Greek holdings. As Treasury Bond yields soared following a series of sovereign credit rating downgrades, commercial banks across Europe began to experience large-scale bad debt provisions, and the pressure to replenish capital suddenly increased. Taking Belgium's Dexia Bank as an example, the liquidity shock caused by European debt prevented it from addressing its risk exposure of over 20 billion euros, forcing it to become the first bank to collapse. Other large European banks, such as Societe Generale,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/0HB5.UK\">BNP Paribas</a>Their ratings were also downgraded due to their large holdings of Greek government bonds.</p><p><b>2.2. The belated bailout measures also caused the impact of European debt to spiral out of control.</b></p><p><b>The failure of core European countries, represented by Germany, to provide timely assistance led to a further escalation of the European debt crisis.</b>In fact, only Greece had a debt problem in the early stages of the European debt crisis, but Germany adopted a passive bystander attitude at the time, believing that Greece should first reform its high-welfare and high-deficit social structure and did not intend to continue to act as an \"ATM\". In early 2010, Merkel's government also threatened to kick members who did not comply with fiscal discipline out of the eurozone. This hardline stance exacerbated market panic, dragging Ireland, Portugal, and Italy, which also faced high debt problems, into the mix. Germany's hardline stance has also increased the cost of bailing out the European debt crisis.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/84e83452454edb9f244374becaeaaf6f\" tg-width=\"623\" tg-height=\"464\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/abd8858e0e6e97ce19a74299f23ab516\" tg-width=\"621\" tg-height=\"467\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>In mid-2010, Germany recognized the seriousness of the European debt crisis and began to establish an EU crisis management mechanism. However, missing the best opportunity still caused the entire Eurozone to pay higher costs.</b>In May 2010, German Chancellor Angela Merkel relented and agreed to take on the responsibility of maintaining the stability of the euro, ultimately deciding to provide Greece with a three-year loan and credit guarantee of 110 billion euros. However, more than six months had passed since the Greek crisis, and the chain reaction of European debt had spiraled out of control. Subsequently, the European Central Bank had to inject more than €1 trillion in liquidity into the market through two rounds of three-year long-term refinancing operations (LTROs). The European Central Bank (ECB) launched its Securities Markets Programme (SMP), which involves weekly time deposit instruments to hedge liquidity injections. As of September 28, 2012, the ECB had purchased €208.83 billion in government bonds under the SMP programme. This intervention effectively lowered the yield on the Greek 10-year Treasury Bond by 8 basis points. The European Central Bank eliminates the tail risk of the euro by purchasing sovereign bonds (OMTs) on the secondary market. OMTs purchase sovereign bonds with maturities of 1 to 3 years, with no size cap or yield target, based on bailout programs such as the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF) and the European Stability Mechanism (ESM).</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/48f726a41026ac863575ccad237c0ec5\" tg-width=\"926\" tg-height=\"709\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>2.3. The core contradiction in the European debt problem lies in the monetary unification of the Eurozone, but the lack of fiscal unification.</b></p><p><b>High welfare spending has forced European countries to rely heavily on bond issuance, but for peripheral countries with weak endogenous economic growth, it is tantamount to \"drinking poison to quench thirst\".</b>Europe is known worldwide for its high welfare. For example, in Italy and Greece, social welfare spending accounted for as much as 21% of GDP in 2009, while in the United States and Canada it was only 14.66% and 9.87% respectively during the same period. At the same time, the industrial structure of the peripheral countries of the Eurozone is unbalanced, with most of them relying on real estate and services as their pillar industries. The manufacturing sector is hollowed out, and they have to use debt to boost investment and stimulate consumption in order to maintain a seemingly \"peaceful\" but actually fragile economy. Therefore, the surge in debt repayment pressure brought about by European debt inevitably appeared first in peripheral countries with high welfare and high fiscal deficits. As early as 2007, Greece's fiscal expenditure had reached 6.7% of GDP, while Portugal and Spain were also around 5% of GDP, both exceeding the Eurozone warning line.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0cda0d0996de5805a3e1b454690d34da\" tg-width=\"624\" tg-height=\"451\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/71feaf044db90b2a18341d785a7f8306\" tg-width=\"622\" tg-height=\"465\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>Joining the Eurozone gives peripheral countries such as Greece a certain amount of backing, enabling them to \"free-ride\" and expand their fiscal deficits at low cost.</b>Peripheral countries, due to their underdeveloped economies, had significantly higher borrowing costs before joining the Eurozone than core countries like Germany and France. However, after joining the euro, the market believed that the credit levels of countries across the Eurozone were consistent. Before the outbreak of European debt in 2010, the yields of both economically disadvantaged southern countries and economically developed northern countries in the 10-year Treasury Bond were around 5%, demonstrating the market's \"unfounded\" confidence in the Eurozone. As a result, economically weaker peripheral countries could leverage the Eurozone shell to obtain high credit ratings and borrow heavily at a lower cost. For a long time, core countries, led by Germany, have been capital exporters, while peripheral countries such as the \"European Pig Five\" have been capital inflows, resulting in long-term trade deficits.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ff4957e68990c695b9351d3712298946\" tg-width=\"623\" tg-height=\"472\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6250b57c451c5b1cb12b98dd3770c657\" tg-width=\"622\" tg-height=\"464\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>Unable to regulate the economy through monetary policy, the peripheral countries of the Eurozone can only rely on fiscal stimulus, which ultimately leads to a snowball of debt out of control.</b>The monetary policies of EU member states are uniformly formulated by the European Central Bank, which has focused on maintaining the stability of the euro since its inception and has no obligation to manage financial markets. In other words, when the market needs expansionary monetary policy to regulate the economy, the ECB will not take action to stabilize the financial environment by prioritizing the depreciation of the euro. However, as the impact of European debt expanded, the ECB had to act as a \"lender of last resort\" at the end of 2011, providing liquidity supplements through open market operations. Taking Germany as an example, the Bundesbank provided nearly 500 billion euros in loans through the ECB's TARGET-2 system in order to reduce the repayment pressure on banks in heavily indebted eurozone countries.</p><p><b>2.4. International capital played a \"fueling\" role in European debt.</b></p><p><b>Wall Street had its eye on Greece, which was \"living on debt,\" as early as the early 2000s.</b>In 1999, Greece was excluded from the European Economic and Monetary Union because it did not meet the conditions: the Maastricht Treaty stipulated that Eurozone member states must meet two conditions: First, countries must keep their annual deficits below 3% of GDP; Second, each country's Treasury Bond must account for less than 60% of its total GDP. Greece uses the euro to the dollar exchange rate of 1 to 1 and<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GS\">Goldman Sachs</a>The currency swap (at the time, the euro exchange rate against the dollar was roughly 1:0.9) was a \"devil's agreement\" that allowed the Greek government to cover up a public debt of up to 1 billion euros, resulting in a Greek deficit of only 1.5% of GDP on paper (actually 4.1%). Greece met the criteria for becoming a member of the eurozone on paper and joined the eurozone in 2001. However, fiscal fraud can only cover up the problem; the debt itself will not disappear. Instead, Greece has had to create more currency swaps to cover up its debt and deficit, which has increased its debt burden and made it trapped in a debt spiral from which it cannot extricate itself.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/45e21029ba71d609ae2dee610a906ec0\" tg-width=\"947\" tg-height=\"601\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>In addition to earning high commissions, international investment banks have also tied the core countries of the Eurozone to the \"pirate ship\" through financial derivatives.</b>After completing its transaction with Greece, Goldman Sachs purchased €1 billion in 20-year credit default swaps (CDSs) from German banks to hedge against Greek Treasury Bond risk, so that the underwriters could cover the losses in the event of payment problems with Greek debt. Given that Germany is the largest economy in the Eurozone, this move is tantamount to tying Germany to Greece's \"debt giant ship\". If the Greek government faces a payment crisis and the debt chain breaks, Germany will have to pay for 1 billion euros in debt.</p><p><b>3. Is the \"Minsky moment\" for European debt approaching? The European Central Bank has intervened, and short-term risks are controllable</b></p><p><b>3.1. Credit rating downgrades and ECB rate hike were key drivers of the escalating European debt crisis in 2010.</b></p><p>If we take the performance of Greek and Portuguese 10-year Treasury Bond yields during the European debt crisis as an example, after four rounds of sovereign credit rating downgrades and two rounds of ECB rate hike, the 10-year Treasury Bond in both countries jumped by 120-160 basis points, which is the \"mastermind behind the intensification of liquidity runs.\" In fact, when Greece announced its fiscal problems at the end of September 2010, the yield on the Greek 10-year Treasury Bond had jumped by only 20 basis points, far less than during the downgrade.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eab7de507966e0625a200fca71fe848c\" tg-width=\"944\" tg-height=\"672\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>Furthermore, the European Central Bank misjudged the situation and tightened monetary policy prematurely, further fueling the European debt crisis.</b>In April 2011, the European Central Bank decided to end its emergency bailout of peripheral countries, raising the deposit facilitation rate from 0.25% to 0.50%, and rate hike it again to 75 basis points in July, which further worsened the European debt crisis. Greece's Treasury Bond yield soared to around 30%, an increase of about 50%. In November 2011, the European Central Bank resumed its interest rate cut bailout measures, and with the help of non-traditional bailout tools, the Eurozone economy gradually improved.</p><p><b>3.2. Comparison of the European Debt Crisis with the Current Ten Points: Short-term risks are controllable; attention should be paid to the effectiveness of the ECB's \"fragmentation\" plan.</b></p><p>There has been no large-scale downgrade of sovereign credit ratings in 2010, the Eurozone's ability to control risks has been enhanced, and in the short term, European debt risk remains within a controllable range. In particular, the European Central Bank, having significantly learned from the \"lessons\" of not taking timely action during the previous round of European debt shocks, has already provided a \"preventative shot\" to the market and prepared a rescue plan, which has alleviated investors' current concerns to some extent. However, given that Europe is currently facing significantly higher pressures in areas such as inflation, economy, and geopolitical issues than in 2010, the outlook for European debt remains unclear. We believe that the implementation effect of the ECB's \"fragmentation\" plan, the TPI, remains a key focus.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/864b9d8c4a504c7047be2670827d0e15\" tg-width=\"785\" tg-height=\"756\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>3.2.1. Improvements compared to the European debt crisis: Risk tolerance and response speed have both increased.</b></p><p><b>Comparing the current situation with the European debt crisis in 2010, we have found five improvements:</b></p><p><b>1) Debt repayment costs have decreased.</b>Despite the current high level of government debt, the average interest rate on outstanding debt has decreased. During the 2011 European debt crisis, the average interest rate on Greece's outstanding debt was as high as 4.69%, while currently, the average outstanding interest rate in all Eurozone countries is below 3.50%, fluctuating around 3%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ff2238505a03ecb2fe1baf7a811cdee0\" tg-width=\"622\" tg-height=\"446\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/680a04e0995a13b1e48000ba117ca7f5\" tg-width=\"623\" tg-height=\"452\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>2) The bad debt ratio decreased and the capital adequacy ratio increased.</b>In terms of risk resistance, the bad debt ratios of Eurozone countries in this round of risks are all below 10%, while their capital adequacy ratios are above 10%. During the European debt period, Greece's capital adequacy ratio was below 0%, and its bad debt ratio was above 47%. Compared with the 2010 European debt crisis, European economies have a better ability to resist risks in this round of crisis.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/54ed6b576e5aaca9245552291f612b88\" tg-width=\"950\" tg-height=\"551\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>3) The European Central Bank has more experience in dealing with the 2011 European debt crisis.</b>European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde served as IMF Managing Director during the European debt crisis and was a \"troublemaker\" in resolving the crisis. Following the announcement of the July rate hike, in response to significant market concerns following the European Central Bank's monetary tightening plan, the ECB held an emergency meeting a week later to discuss corresponding measures and proposed launching a new bond purchase program in July. A month later, on July 21, the European Central Bank announced a 50 basis point rate hike, and at the same time launched a new bond purchase \"Transmission Protection Instrument\" (TPI) to prevent the problem of \"fragmentation\" from worsening.</p><p><b>The current debt repayment pressure is controllable, but if core countries such as Germany and France are unable to survive due to economic problems during the 2023 debt repayment peak, the ECB's bailout effect may be greatly reduced, and the European debt problem will also face uncertainty.</b>The five PIIGS countries had a total outstanding debt of approximately €350 billion in 2022, compared to the current available funds of approximately €360 billion in the European Stability Mechanism (ESM), indicating that short-term risks are temporarily under control. However, heavily indebted countries will see a peak in debt repayment in 2023, with approximately 561.3 billion euros due in the five PIIGs, of which Italy accounts for 63%. The amount of debt repayment is huge, and the risks should not be underestimated. Judging from the ECB's current statements, the details of the newly launched TPI are still rather vague, such as requiring applicant countries to meet four basic requirements, including 1) compliance with the EU fiscal framework; 2) There are no serious macroeconomic imbalances; 3) Fiscal and public debt sustainability; 4) Macroeconomic policies are sound and sustainable.</p><p>From another perspective, if the current TPI targeted bond purchase method is similar to the bond purchase policy of the Treasury Bond Market Direct Purchase (OMT) program in the secondary market during the European debt period, it may need to comply with the principles of the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF) and the European Stability Mechanism (ESM): the loan guarantee amount is 165% of the capital contribution amount, with Germany and France, the countries that contribute the most, bearing approximately 27% and 21% respectively. Considering that the EU provided €60 billion in bailout funds during the European debt crisis, and the IMF provided €240 billion in bailout funds, assuming that the EU and the IMF provide equal bailout funds, the remaining debt is spread over three years, requiring €150 million to be repaid annually. Germany and France would need to contribute €668.2 billion and €519.8 billion respectively annually over three years to repay the debt. These funds would account for approximately 18.7% and 16.2% of Germany's and France's GDP respectively, placing a heavy burden on core countries.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e8f37bb4992a0c0655c979378becf817\" tg-width=\"733\" tg-height=\"749\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>4) Market sentiment has improved somewhat after the ECB's action.</b>Despite panic in market sentiment following the European Central Bank's announcement of July rate hike, Italy's FTSE MIB index fell 6% to 22,547.48. In the week that followed, the European Central Bank held an emergency meeting, and the stock market rebounded, with Italy's FTSE MIB index rising 2%. On July 21, the European Central Bank raised rate hike by 50 basis points, exceeding expectations, and launched a new TPI bond purchase program. The market reaction was less strong than expected, with Italy's FTSE MIB index closing slightly higher by 0.65% on the second day.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4477efa53d7022dd5b39eb52c670e582\" tg-width=\"730\" tg-height=\"494\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>5) In this round of risk, the proportion of foreign holdings of Treasury Bond in Eurozone countries has decreased slightly.</b>Therefore, the risk of foreign capital \"fleeing\" during a crisis, leading to a chain reaction of soaring Treasury Bond rates, is slightly reduced. Taking Spain and Portugal as examples, as of the end of last year, 74% and 82% of their Treasury Bond were held by domestic commercial banks and non-bank institutions, respectively, while in 2011 only about 64% and 67% of their Treasury Bond were held by domestic capital, respectively. The Italian, Greek, and Irish holdings in Treasury Bond during the current and European debt crisis are basically the same as they were during the European debt crisis.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e19d650708bc4e5d23e75e4068f23949\" tg-width=\"482\" tg-height=\"357\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c36208dc67aed06319c7fcc15cd42435\" tg-width=\"477\" tg-height=\"358\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>3.2.2. Compared to the current worsening of the European debt crisis: rising debt levels and economic pressure may lead to a decrease in bailout capacity.</b></p><p><b>Comparing the current situation with the European debt crisis in 2010, we have found five points of deterioration:</b></p><p><b>1) The economic pressure facing the Eurozone has increased significantly compared to the previous round. Germany, the \"economic locomotive\" of the Eurozone, has experienced its first trade deficit of 1 billion euros in 30 years, reducing its ability to provide crisis relief.</b>During the European debt crisis, the most significant external shock was the 2008 global economic crisis, which resulted in zero global GDP growth for the first time. Compared to this round of risks, the average GDP growth rate in the past two years has been 3%, which is weaker than the economic level before the European debt crisis. The Eurozone is facing its most severe geopolitical crisis since World War II, with the Geopolitical Risk Index (GPR) at an all-time high, above 300. In addition, Europe, which has long relied on Russian imports, has been affected by the Russia-Ukraine conflict, causing its natural gas, oil, electricity and consumer goods prices to surge to $34.35 per million British thermal units.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a65c581f52939de86298cb6811327bd8\" tg-width=\"484\" tg-height=\"352\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c730055545b283140c09b818d316c89c\" tg-width=\"481\" tg-height=\"354\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8f8357be18d5dce44af50c9c351e1de7\" tg-width=\"482\" tg-height=\"388\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/31ce2e58fbfb8e2b9cfd2024a149fbcc\" tg-width=\"477\" tg-height=\"383\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>2) Eurozone countries are currently facing unprecedentedly high inflationary pressures.</b>Eurozone inflation is gradually approaching and rising, now far exceeding the level before European debt, with the harmonized CPI (HICP) reaching a year-on-year high of 8.6%, the highest level in history. Furthermore, the dual structure of separating fiscal and monetary policies among Eurozone countries has not changed, and the fact that \"fragmentation\" and unbalanced development among Eurozone countries have not improved also poses resistance to inflation regulation.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/29a7cb88bc64070c0b1c07beead5e0e2\" tg-width=\"480\" tg-height=\"356\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/de2092286c9ee47d57e20c21d52bf088\" tg-width=\"481\" tg-height=\"364\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>3) The Eurozone's debt level remains high.</b>The debt-to-GDP ratio of the peripheral countries of the Eurozone is close to and exceeds the level of 2009, and the outstanding government debt balance has gradually increased from 600 billion euros during the European debt period to 1 trillion euros now.</p><p><b>4) The euro fell to a record low, and capital outflows continued.</b>In this round of debt risk, the euro has weakened compared to the European debt period. The euro has historically reached a high of 1.6 against the US dollar and a low of 1.2 during the European debt period. Now that the euro has weakened, the euro has fallen below 1:1 against the US dollar, reaching a historical low.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5179b7a9e5ea3281459cc2ce33ca324c\" tg-width=\"480\" tg-height=\"367\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1d46dde1623095785c85d21ee8e864a8\" tg-width=\"478\" tg-height=\"363\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>5) The proportion of peripheral country bonds held by European commercial banks increased by 5%.</b>During the European debt crisis, Eurozone commercial banks held a large number of heavily indebted countries in Treasury Bond. As a result of the soaring Treasury Bond yields caused by the downgrade of sovereign credit ratings, European commercial banks gradually collapsed, and capital pressure suddenly increased. In this round of risks, commercial banks have increased their holdings of sovereign bonds of Eurozone countries, posing greater capital risks to banks. Taking Portugal as an example, the proportion of Portuguese sovereign debt held by major European commercial banks to the country's sovereign debt has increased by about 5% compared to the European debt era.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c2a22935ad810cdb8c0a9b8cd2f310a0\" tg-width=\"728\" tg-height=\"461\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>3.3. The effectiveness of the ECB's TPI implementation is of paramount importance; pay attention to liquidity and credit indicator early warnings.</b></p><p>To avoid shocks to the Eurozone bond market during central bank rate hike, the European Central Bank, while announcing a 50 basis point rate hike, launched the \"Transmission Protection Instrument (TPI)\" to target and unlimited new bond purchase programs. This aims to control the borrowing costs of heavily indebted Eurozone governments such as Italy, transmit monetary policy to all Eurozone countries, and avoid exacerbating the problem of \"fragmentation.\" However, it is worth noting that, unlike in 2011, Germany, the \"locomotive\" of the European economy, is also suffering from an economic recession, which may greatly reduce its enthusiasm for the ECB's bailout plan. Whether the bailout capacity, which accounted for about 21% of the ESM bailout plan during the European debt crisis, can be continued is also worth paying attention to.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/44bf00b93ba00cdcc63429155976e045\" tg-width=\"730\" tg-height=\"516\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>Since the European debt problem is essentially caused by credit defaults and liquidity runs, liquidity and credit indicators have a certain warning effect:</b></p><p>1) Liquidity indicators, such as the Euro LIBOR-OIS spread approaching 0.5%, should be taken seriously, as there may be chain debt risk exposure caused by insufficient interbank liquidity.</p><p>2) Credit indicators, such as when the credit default swap rate (CDS) is above 150, indicate that the market is concerned about sovereign credit risk.</p><p>3) The interest rate spread between the core and peripheral countries of the Eurozone has widened to more than 300 basis points. Italy may be the \"first domino\" in this round of European debt problems. The spread between Italian, German, and Italian 10-year Treasury Bond yields is gradually widening to over 200 basis points. If the spread gradually approaches the 300 basis points of the 2010 European debt crisis, we should be vigilant.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/768567bc6fe0f18d58e5569515433dc8\" tg-width=\"483\" tg-height=\"343\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aed5c286d9ae323db5bab55def20c9a1\" tg-width=\"482\" tg-height=\"346\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>4. The European debt problem presents a \"crisis coexisting\" for my country.</b></p><p><b>4.1. European turmoil affects Sino-European trade in the short term, but the Chinese market is becoming increasingly important for revitalizing the European economy.</b></p><p><b>The EU is my country's second-largest trading partner, and the pressure on the European economy may lead to a slowdown in my country's import and export growth.</b>In 2021, my country's exports to the EU reached US$518.661 billion, accounting for 15.42% of the total. Imports amounted to US$309.931 billion, accounting for 11.54%. The potential debt problems in the Eurozone may subsequently impact China's imports and exports. Historically, when the Eurozone is under significant economic pressure, such as during the 2008 subprime mortgage crisis, the 2010 European debt crisis, and the impact of the 2020 pandemic, my country's imports and exports with the EU have all turned from positive to negative year-on-year, which has also greatly dragged down my country's import and export trade. Under the impact of the last round of European debt, from Q1 2011 to Q3 2012, the Eurozone manufacturing PMI declined from 57.93 to 45.07. During the same period, my country's export growth rate fell from 26.42% to 4.43%, and its import growth rate fell from 32.99% to 1.39%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6b59ac53cd28cc68ff5dea567184430e\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"750\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/60c61d802f396d39129ace35cf2af81e\" tg-width=\"480\" tg-height=\"344\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p><b>From an industry perspective, power equipment, electronics, and basic chemicals are highly dependent on Sino-European trade.</b>In terms of exports, the power equipment industry accounts for the largest share, reaching 41.24%, with motors accounting for 18.91%, power equipment accounting for 19.79%, and power grid equipment accounting for 2.55%. From the perspective of domestic imports, the power equipment industry accounts for the largest share, reaching 46.20%, of which motors account for 21.37%, power equipment accounts for 22.25%, and power grid equipment accounts for 2.58%.</p><p><b>At the individual stock level, the top 100 companies in terms of overseas business scale or proportion are mainly concentrated in the electronics, home appliance and pharmaceutical sectors.</b>Among the 100 A-share listed companies with the largest overseas business revenue, 18 have electronics subsidiaries, including 8 consumer electronics companies, 3 optoelectronics companies, and 4 semiconductor companies. There are 7 listed home appliance companies, including 3 black appliance companies and 4 white goods companies. Among the 100 A-share listed companies with the highest proportion of overseas business revenue, 17 are in the pharmaceutical and biological industry, including 14 medical device companies, 2 chemical pharmaceutical companies, and 1 medical service company. There are 14 companies in the electronics industry, including 8 consumer electronics companies, 2 optoelectronics companies, and 2 listed semiconductor companies.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4a02a7a7c245df32957dee0f005e2e48\" tg-width=\"783\" tg-height=\"761\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>The economic pressure brought about by the European debt crisis may increase the EU's trade dependence on my country, and attention should be paid to the possibility of restarting the China-EU agreement in the future.</b>In terms of the content of the China-EU agreement, it mainly revolves around three aspects: market opening, fair competition, and investment protection. The first aspect is market opening, emphasizing that both sides will relax market access. In this regard, China has made unprecedented access commitments in many industries. The second aspect is fair competition, with both parties jointly committing to respecting intellectual property rights, improving labor standards, perfecting standard setting, and maintaining market order. The third aspect is investment protection. Both parties protect each other's investments, ensure a fair and transparent investment environment, and guarantee clear and transparent regulatory procedures. In May 2021, the European Parliament passed a resolution to freeze the China-EU investment agreement, thus shelving the agreement. However, as the Chinese market becomes increasingly important to revitalizing the European economy, Sino-European relations are expected to warm up.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b944fbbc17b4fb6aa6d5e8e4ade8453\" tg-width=\"619\" tg-height=\"484\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>4.2. With RMB substitution and diverging fundamentals, the Chinese stock, bond, and currency markets are expected to experience independent trends.</b></p><p><b>The escalating European debt crisis will trigger a \"risk-off\" mode for global financial assets, and the A-share market will not be immune in the short term. However, in the long run, the increase in the proportion of RMB as a reserve currency will boost the exchange rate and asset value.</b>Since 2022, the US dollar has appreciated by 8.9% against other countries and the RMB by 6.3% against the European Union and Japan, respectively. Behind this round of currency appreciation is the competitive rotation of international reserve currencies; As the proportion of the RMB in international monetary reserves continues to increase, the RMB and related assets will continue to appreciate in the future.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fad3d766fb509c5abb4d068ed0a422ed\" tg-width=\"576\" tg-height=\"428\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/71a4770a0219ba65c4bb0323636807af\" tg-width=\"576\" tg-height=\"423\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p></body></html></p>","source":"lsy1650252355349","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is the \"Minsky\" moment for European debt approaching? This time is different.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs the \"Minsky\" moment for European debt approaching? This time is different.\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">李美岑投资策略</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2022-07-25 21:45</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><html><head></head><body><b>The European Central Bank has joined the global tightening wave, and the specter of European debt looms over Italy.</b>To prevent inflation and the euro from deteriorating further, the European Central Bank raised rate hike by 50 basis points on the evening of July 21, exceeding expectations. The Eurozone bid farewell to an eight-year era of negative interest rates, and there is a possibility of further tightening in September, October, and December. As one of the PIIGS countries with a heavy debt burden, Italy is most at risk: 1) Since 2019, its debt has continued to grow rapidly, currently accounting for nearly 60% of the PIIGS countries; 2) The economic situation is also deteriorating. The new government took office in 2018 but did not bring about economic improvement. Since 2019, GDP growth has continued to decline to 0%. 3) Rampant populism and increasing inflationary pressures have both led to a decline in economic stability. At the end of 2020, Italy's unemployment rate reached 9.15%. Following the ECB's announcement of rate hike, the yield on Italy's 10-year Treasury Bond immediately surged to 4.14%, and the interest rate spread between Germany and Italy continued to widen to around 236 basis points, gradually approaching the level seen during the 2010 European debt crisis.</p><p><b>Historically, credit rating downgrades and ECB rate hike have been major drivers of the escalating European debt crisis.</b>If we take the performance of Greek and Portuguese 10-year Treasury Bond yields during the European debt crisis as an example, after four rounds of sovereign credit rating downgrades and two rounds of ECB rate hike, the 10-year Treasury Bond in both countries jumped by 120-160 basis points, which is the \"mastermind behind the intensification of liquidity runs.\" In fact, when Greece announced its fiscal problems at the end of September 2010, the yield on the Greek 10-year Treasury Bond had jumped by only 20 basis points, far less than during the downgrade. Furthermore, core European countries, represented by Germany, did not provide timely assistance and did not begin to establish an EU crisis management mechanism until mid-2010, which led to the liquidity run caused by European debt spreading from peripheral countries to core countries, represented by France.</p><p><b>Short-term risks are controllable, but in the long run, the effectiveness of the ECB's TPI implementation is of paramount importance. Pay attention to liquidity and credit indicator early warnings.</b>The five PIIGS countries had a total outstanding debt of approximately €350 billion in 2022, compared to the current available funds of approximately €360 billion in the European Stability Mechanism (ESM), indicating that short-term risks are temporarily under control. However, during the debt repayment peak in 2023, the five PIIGS countries had approximately 561.3 billion euros due, of which Italy accounted for 63%, representing a huge amount of debt repayment. Although the currently launched TPI targeted bond purchase instrument does not have a purchase limit, the specific implementation details are still relatively vague. If core countries such as Germany and France struggle to survive due to economic problems, the effectiveness of the ECB's bailout may be greatly reduced, and the European debt problem will also face uncertainty. Since the European debt problem is essentially caused by credit defaults and liquidity runs, we will continue to pay attention to liquidity indicators (LIBOR-OIS spread) and credit indicators (credit default swap rate CDS and German-Italian 10-year Treasury Bond spread).</p><p><b>The European debt problem is a \"crisis coexisting\" for my country.</b>On the economic front, the EU is my country's second-largest trading partner. The pressure on the European economy may lead to a slowdown in my country's import and export growth. Under the impact of the last round of European debt, my country's export growth rate fell from 26.42% to 4.43%, and its import growth rate fell from 32.99% to 1.39%. On the other hand, the economic pressure brought about by the European debt crisis may increase the EU's trade dependence on my country, and attention should be paid to the possibility of restarting the China-EU agreement in the future. On the financial front, the escalation of the European debt crisis will trigger a \"risk-off\" mode for global financial assets, and the A-share market will not be immune in the short term. However, in the long run, with the replacement of the RMB and the divergence in fundamentals, the Chinese stock, bond, and foreign exchange markets are expected to develop independent trends.</p><p><b>Risk warning: Geopolitical crisis; Overseas rate hike exceeded expectations; The spread of the epidemic exceeded expectations.</b></p><p><b>text</b></p><p><b>1. The European Central Bank joins the global tightening wave, raising concerns about a European debt default.</b></p><p><b>1.1 Inflationary pressures repeatedly reach new highs, making the \"era of negative interest rates\" in the Eurozone a thing of the past.</b></p><p><b>The rise in oil prices triggered by the Russia-Ukraine conflict has led to a record high in inflation in the Eurozone, and the huge trade deficit has also caused the euro to fall to a 20-year low.</b>About 30% of the EU's oil imports come from Russia. Following supply chain strains caused by the Russia-Ukraine conflict at the beginning of the year and the partial oil embargo imposed on Russia by the US and Europe in May, the EU's crude oil imports from Russia have decreased by 20% compared to last year, and the supply-demand gap continues to widen. The current inflation rate in the Eurozone has reached 8.6%, a record high since its inception; The core CPI, excluding factors such as energy and food, was 3.7%, which also demonstrates the significant impact of energy prices on the Eurozone. Driven by rising import costs and weak external demand due to energy prices, the Eurozone has experienced its largest trade deficit since its inception (32.4 billion euros). Even Germany, the \"locomotive\" of the European economy, experienced its first trade deficit in 30 years in May.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ae99577318ca9108e9ff778ed2b142f7\" tg-width=\"623\" tg-height=\"481\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ef865d7c8ef48b331a4ab89a4bc5492b\" tg-width=\"622\" tg-height=\"481\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>To prevent inflation and the euro's performance from deteriorating further, the European Central Bank joined the global \"water withdrawal model,\" marking the end of an eight-year era of negative interest rates in the Eurozone.</b>Since its establishment in 1998, the European Central Bank has adjusted its monetary policy with the inflation rate as the core variable. In July 2021, the European Central Bank adjusted its monetary policy strategy, changing the monetary policy target from \"below but close to 2%\" to a symmetrical target of 2%. The Eurozone's inflation rate has now far exceeded the 2% target. Based on this, the European Central Bank announced a 50 basis point rate hike on the evening of July 21, ending an eight-year period of negative interest rates in the Eurozone before the third quarter. In addition, boosting the euro exchange rate is also one of the ECB's objectives in considering rate hike. Currently, due to the huge trade deficit, the euro has fallen below 1:1 against the dollar, a new low in 20 years, while the euro jumped 90 points against the dollar after the ECB rate hike 50 basis points.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5c1f314ac60faf81f63dc2224fdda9e6\" tg-width=\"948\" tg-height=\"638\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>1.2 rate hike pushes up debt costs, and the specter of European debt looms over Italy.</b></p><p><b>Debt levels in European countries have continued to rise since the 2010 European debt crisis, and this rate hike may further trigger the risk of default in peripheral countries by pushing up borrowing costs.</b>Taking the \"PIIG countries\" as an example, their current debt burden has long exceeded the level during the 2010 European debt crisis. Greece's national debt-to-GDP ratio is close to 200%, followed by Italy, Spain, and Portugal, which fluctuate around 120% of GDP. After the ECB initiated its first rate hike in July, there is a possibility that it will continue to tighten monetary policy in September, October and December. In the future, debt repayment interest rates in Eurozone countries will jump non-linearly, and the rate hike plan will expose heavily indebted countries to the potential risk of debt crises due to rising borrowing costs.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aec821604531a0bf44d93798410bbbda\" tg-width=\"621\" tg-height=\"472\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/55ab61b0445fde666357d205d28e915a\" tg-width=\"621\" tg-height=\"478\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>Italy may be the most dangerous \"flammable commodity\" in this European debt crisis.</b>Since 2019, Italy's debt has continued to grow rapidly, with outstanding debt exceeding 2 trillion euros over the next 10 years, accounting for nearly 60% of the five IPIC countries. Meanwhile, the economic situation is also deteriorating. The new government took office in 2018 but did not bring about economic improvement. In 2019, GDP growth continued to decline to 0%. Subsequently, the impact of the pandemic on the service sector also severely damaged the Italian economy. In addition, rampant populism and increasing inflationary pressures have both led to a decline in economic stability. At the end of 2020, Italy's unemployment rate reached 9.15%. After the European Central Bank announced its rate hike, the market generally worried that Italy would become the first \"bomb\" in this European debt default. The yield on Italy's 10-year Treasury Bond immediately soared to 4.14%, and the interest rate spread between Germany and Italy continued to widen to around 236 basis points, gradually approaching the level during the 2010 European debt crisis.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/352a1e10163f43bc57f2ee2696fef298\" tg-width=\"622\" tg-height=\"453\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e65ad6e7d00387f27f0f68e16301b7f5\" tg-width=\"623\" tg-height=\"460\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>2. The essence of the European debt crisis is a liquidity run in the entire Eurozone.</b></p><p><b>The European debt crisis is a derivative of the 2008 subprime mortgage crisis.</b>Southern Europe, with its weak endogenous growth, has long maintained a \"false prosperity\" in its economy through real estate and tourism under an economic structure with a hollowed-out manufacturing sector. The subprime mortgage crisis led to a sharp decline in real estate and tourism, cutting off Southern Europe's sources of income. Banks in countries such as Ireland and Spain have had to seek government assistance due to large amounts of bad real estate debt. Taking Ireland as an example, the local government injected at least 70 billion euros into the financial system, more than half of the GDP at the time. This led to the government being unable to borrow under the subsequent impact of European debt and having to seek help from the IMF.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/787d43a12dcb17ac7b010e11444e8d07\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"522\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>2.1. Against the backdrop of cross-holdings of Treasury Bond within the Eurozone, the rating downgrade became the trigger for the \"fiery conflict\".</b></p><p><b>The 2008 subprime mortgage crisis pushed Greece to a \"dead end,\" and the downgrade of Greece's rating was the first \"domino\" that triggered the European debt crisis.</b>After the 2008 subprime mortgage crisis, Greece, which was highly dependent on foreign investment, could no longer enjoy the economic dividends brought by exports and real estate. At the same time, since the ECB controls the monetary and exchange rate, Greece cannot stimulate the economy through independent monetary easing or currency devaluation, and can only choose to engage in massive Treasury Bond and expand fiscal spending. In early October 2009, the newly appointed Greek Finance Minister announced that the previous government's debt had been falsified. In fact, at that time, the fiscal deficit and public debt accounted for as much as 12.7% and 113% of GDP, respectively, far exceeding the 3% and 60% stipulated by the EU. In December, the three major rating agencies downgraded Greece's sovereign credit rating and gave it a negative outlook, directly leading to a surge in Greece's 10-year Treasury Bond, a significant widening of the interest rate spread with Germany, and panic in the market.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a918d6455be7c166b2c650eede522954\" tg-width=\"619\" tg-height=\"504\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/be57e1656f3a830e584216fc4737818a\" tg-width=\"623\" tg-height=\"477\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>The successive defaults of Portugal, Ireland, Spain, and Italy have gradually shifted the debt crisis from peripheral countries of the Eurozone to core countries.</b>The defaults of the \"PIGS\" countries differed. Portugal followed Greece's lead and increased its real fiscal deficit to 8%. The market was worried that it would not be able to safely weather the upcoming debt repayment peak. Portugal's 10-year Treasury Bond once approached 14.2% from 3.5%. For Ireland, the real estate bubble was the \"originator\". The 2008 subprime mortgage crisis impacted the real estate markets in Europe and the United States. In order to save the five major banks that were about to go bankrupt, the Irish government set a fiscal deficit ratio as high as 32% in 2010, public debt as a percentage of GDP as high as 100%, and its debt pressure surpassed that of Greece. The country's 10-year Treasury Bond soared to 9%. In October 2011, France, the core country of the Eurozone, was...<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MCO\">Moody's</a>The latter pointed out that France has the weakest debt performance among AAA-rated countries and its sovereign debt situation continues to deteriorate. Subsequently, Italy's public debt ratio climbed to 120%, second only to Greece, and rating agencies successively downgraded its sovereign rating. With Italy, France, and Spain accounting for as much as 55% of the Eurozone's Treasury Bond market, far exceeding that of Greece, Ireland, and Portugal (combined at only 7%), the European debt problem had evolved from a localized shock into a crisis for the entire Eurozone by the end of 2011.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5c9032ac6c07f356abceccf84c92b758\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"553\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>At the same time, the European debt crisis has escalated from sovereign states to the level of commercial banks throughout the Eurozone.</b>Eurozone commercial banks hold a large amount of Greek Treasury Bond, with French, German, British, and Portuguese commercial banks alone accounting for more than one-third of Greek holdings. As Treasury Bond yields soared following a series of sovereign credit rating downgrades, commercial banks across Europe began to experience large-scale bad debt provisions, and the pressure to replenish capital suddenly increased. Taking Belgium's Dexia Bank as an example, the liquidity shock caused by European debt prevented it from addressing its risk exposure of over 20 billion euros, forcing it to become the first bank to collapse. Other large European banks, such as Societe Generale,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/0HB5.UK\">BNP Paribas</a>Their ratings were also downgraded due to their large holdings of Greek government bonds.</p><p><b>2.2. The belated bailout measures also caused the impact of European debt to spiral out of control.</b></p><p><b>The failure of core European countries, represented by Germany, to provide timely assistance led to a further escalation of the European debt crisis.</b>In fact, only Greece had a debt problem in the early stages of the European debt crisis, but Germany adopted a passive bystander attitude at the time, believing that Greece should first reform its high-welfare and high-deficit social structure and did not intend to continue to act as an \"ATM\". In early 2010, Merkel's government also threatened to kick members who did not comply with fiscal discipline out of the eurozone. This hardline stance exacerbated market panic, dragging Ireland, Portugal, and Italy, which also faced high debt problems, into the mix. Germany's hardline stance has also increased the cost of bailing out the European debt crisis.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/84e83452454edb9f244374becaeaaf6f\" tg-width=\"623\" tg-height=\"464\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/abd8858e0e6e97ce19a74299f23ab516\" tg-width=\"621\" tg-height=\"467\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>In mid-2010, Germany recognized the seriousness of the European debt crisis and began to establish an EU crisis management mechanism. However, missing the best opportunity still caused the entire Eurozone to pay higher costs.</b>In May 2010, German Chancellor Angela Merkel relented and agreed to take on the responsibility of maintaining the stability of the euro, ultimately deciding to provide Greece with a three-year loan and credit guarantee of 110 billion euros. However, more than six months had passed since the Greek crisis, and the chain reaction of European debt had spiraled out of control. Subsequently, the European Central Bank had to inject more than €1 trillion in liquidity into the market through two rounds of three-year long-term refinancing operations (LTROs). The European Central Bank (ECB) launched its Securities Markets Programme (SMP), which involves weekly time deposit instruments to hedge liquidity injections. As of September 28, 2012, the ECB had purchased €208.83 billion in government bonds under the SMP programme. This intervention effectively lowered the yield on the Greek 10-year Treasury Bond by 8 basis points. The European Central Bank eliminates the tail risk of the euro by purchasing sovereign bonds (OMTs) on the secondary market. OMTs purchase sovereign bonds with maturities of 1 to 3 years, with no size cap or yield target, based on bailout programs such as the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF) and the European Stability Mechanism (ESM).</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/48f726a41026ac863575ccad237c0ec5\" tg-width=\"926\" tg-height=\"709\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>2.3. The core contradiction in the European debt problem lies in the monetary unification of the Eurozone, but the lack of fiscal unification.</b></p><p><b>High welfare spending has forced European countries to rely heavily on bond issuance, but for peripheral countries with weak endogenous economic growth, it is tantamount to \"drinking poison to quench thirst\".</b>Europe is known worldwide for its high welfare. For example, in Italy and Greece, social welfare spending accounted for as much as 21% of GDP in 2009, while in the United States and Canada it was only 14.66% and 9.87% respectively during the same period. At the same time, the industrial structure of the peripheral countries of the Eurozone is unbalanced, with most of them relying on real estate and services as their pillar industries. The manufacturing sector is hollowed out, and they have to use debt to boost investment and stimulate consumption in order to maintain a seemingly \"peaceful\" but actually fragile economy. Therefore, the surge in debt repayment pressure brought about by European debt inevitably appeared first in peripheral countries with high welfare and high fiscal deficits. As early as 2007, Greece's fiscal expenditure had reached 6.7% of GDP, while Portugal and Spain were also around 5% of GDP, both exceeding the Eurozone warning line.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0cda0d0996de5805a3e1b454690d34da\" tg-width=\"624\" tg-height=\"451\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/71feaf044db90b2a18341d785a7f8306\" tg-width=\"622\" tg-height=\"465\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>Joining the Eurozone gives peripheral countries such as Greece a certain amount of backing, enabling them to \"free-ride\" and expand their fiscal deficits at low cost.</b>Peripheral countries, due to their underdeveloped economies, had significantly higher borrowing costs before joining the Eurozone than core countries like Germany and France. However, after joining the euro, the market believed that the credit levels of countries across the Eurozone were consistent. Before the outbreak of European debt in 2010, the yields of both economically disadvantaged southern countries and economically developed northern countries in the 10-year Treasury Bond were around 5%, demonstrating the market's \"unfounded\" confidence in the Eurozone. As a result, economically weaker peripheral countries could leverage the Eurozone shell to obtain high credit ratings and borrow heavily at a lower cost. For a long time, core countries, led by Germany, have been capital exporters, while peripheral countries such as the \"European Pig Five\" have been capital inflows, resulting in long-term trade deficits.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ff4957e68990c695b9351d3712298946\" tg-width=\"623\" tg-height=\"472\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6250b57c451c5b1cb12b98dd3770c657\" tg-width=\"622\" tg-height=\"464\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>Unable to regulate the economy through monetary policy, the peripheral countries of the Eurozone can only rely on fiscal stimulus, which ultimately leads to a snowball of debt out of control.</b>The monetary policies of EU member states are uniformly formulated by the European Central Bank, which has focused on maintaining the stability of the euro since its inception and has no obligation to manage financial markets. In other words, when the market needs expansionary monetary policy to regulate the economy, the ECB will not take action to stabilize the financial environment by prioritizing the depreciation of the euro. However, as the impact of European debt expanded, the ECB had to act as a \"lender of last resort\" at the end of 2011, providing liquidity supplements through open market operations. Taking Germany as an example, the Bundesbank provided nearly 500 billion euros in loans through the ECB's TARGET-2 system in order to reduce the repayment pressure on banks in heavily indebted eurozone countries.</p><p><b>2.4. International capital played a \"fueling\" role in European debt.</b></p><p><b>Wall Street had its eye on Greece, which was \"living on debt,\" as early as the early 2000s.</b>In 1999, Greece was excluded from the European Economic and Monetary Union because it did not meet the conditions: the Maastricht Treaty stipulated that Eurozone member states must meet two conditions: First, countries must keep their annual deficits below 3% of GDP; Second, each country's Treasury Bond must account for less than 60% of its total GDP. Greece uses the euro to the dollar exchange rate of 1 to 1 and<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GS\">Goldman Sachs</a>The currency swap (at the time, the euro exchange rate against the dollar was roughly 1:0.9) was a \"devil's agreement\" that allowed the Greek government to cover up a public debt of up to 1 billion euros, resulting in a Greek deficit of only 1.5% of GDP on paper (actually 4.1%). Greece met the criteria for becoming a member of the eurozone on paper and joined the eurozone in 2001. However, fiscal fraud can only cover up the problem; the debt itself will not disappear. Instead, Greece has had to create more currency swaps to cover up its debt and deficit, which has increased its debt burden and made it trapped in a debt spiral from which it cannot extricate itself.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/45e21029ba71d609ae2dee610a906ec0\" tg-width=\"947\" tg-height=\"601\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>In addition to earning high commissions, international investment banks have also tied the core countries of the Eurozone to the \"pirate ship\" through financial derivatives.</b>After completing its transaction with Greece, Goldman Sachs purchased €1 billion in 20-year credit default swaps (CDSs) from German banks to hedge against Greek Treasury Bond risk, so that the underwriters could cover the losses in the event of payment problems with Greek debt. Given that Germany is the largest economy in the Eurozone, this move is tantamount to tying Germany to Greece's \"debt giant ship\". If the Greek government faces a payment crisis and the debt chain breaks, Germany will have to pay for 1 billion euros in debt.</p><p><b>3. Is the \"Minsky moment\" for European debt approaching? The European Central Bank has intervened, and short-term risks are controllable</b></p><p><b>3.1. Credit rating downgrades and ECB rate hike were key drivers of the escalating European debt crisis in 2010.</b></p><p>If we take the performance of Greek and Portuguese 10-year Treasury Bond yields during the European debt crisis as an example, after four rounds of sovereign credit rating downgrades and two rounds of ECB rate hike, the 10-year Treasury Bond in both countries jumped by 120-160 basis points, which is the \"mastermind behind the intensification of liquidity runs.\" In fact, when Greece announced its fiscal problems at the end of September 2010, the yield on the Greek 10-year Treasury Bond had jumped by only 20 basis points, far less than during the downgrade.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eab7de507966e0625a200fca71fe848c\" tg-width=\"944\" tg-height=\"672\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>Furthermore, the European Central Bank misjudged the situation and tightened monetary policy prematurely, further fueling the European debt crisis.</b>In April 2011, the European Central Bank decided to end its emergency bailout of peripheral countries, raising the deposit facilitation rate from 0.25% to 0.50%, and rate hike it again to 75 basis points in July, which further worsened the European debt crisis. Greece's Treasury Bond yield soared to around 30%, an increase of about 50%. In November 2011, the European Central Bank resumed its interest rate cut bailout measures, and with the help of non-traditional bailout tools, the Eurozone economy gradually improved.</p><p><b>3.2. Comparison of the European Debt Crisis with the Current Ten Points: Short-term risks are controllable; attention should be paid to the effectiveness of the ECB's \"fragmentation\" plan.</b></p><p>There has been no large-scale downgrade of sovereign credit ratings in 2010, the Eurozone's ability to control risks has been enhanced, and in the short term, European debt risk remains within a controllable range. In particular, the European Central Bank, having significantly learned from the \"lessons\" of not taking timely action during the previous round of European debt shocks, has already provided a \"preventative shot\" to the market and prepared a rescue plan, which has alleviated investors' current concerns to some extent. However, given that Europe is currently facing significantly higher pressures in areas such as inflation, economy, and geopolitical issues than in 2010, the outlook for European debt remains unclear. We believe that the implementation effect of the ECB's \"fragmentation\" plan, the TPI, remains a key focus.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/864b9d8c4a504c7047be2670827d0e15\" tg-width=\"785\" tg-height=\"756\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>3.2.1. Improvements compared to the European debt crisis: Risk tolerance and response speed have both increased.</b></p><p><b>Comparing the current situation with the European debt crisis in 2010, we have found five improvements:</b></p><p><b>1) Debt repayment costs have decreased.</b>Despite the current high level of government debt, the average interest rate on outstanding debt has decreased. During the 2011 European debt crisis, the average interest rate on Greece's outstanding debt was as high as 4.69%, while currently, the average outstanding interest rate in all Eurozone countries is below 3.50%, fluctuating around 3%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ff2238505a03ecb2fe1baf7a811cdee0\" tg-width=\"622\" tg-height=\"446\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/680a04e0995a13b1e48000ba117ca7f5\" tg-width=\"623\" tg-height=\"452\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>2) The bad debt ratio decreased and the capital adequacy ratio increased.</b>In terms of risk resistance, the bad debt ratios of Eurozone countries in this round of risks are all below 10%, while their capital adequacy ratios are above 10%. During the European debt period, Greece's capital adequacy ratio was below 0%, and its bad debt ratio was above 47%. Compared with the 2010 European debt crisis, European economies have a better ability to resist risks in this round of crisis.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/54ed6b576e5aaca9245552291f612b88\" tg-width=\"950\" tg-height=\"551\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>3) The European Central Bank has more experience in dealing with the 2011 European debt crisis.</b>European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde served as IMF Managing Director during the European debt crisis and was a \"troublemaker\" in resolving the crisis. Following the announcement of the July rate hike, in response to significant market concerns following the European Central Bank's monetary tightening plan, the ECB held an emergency meeting a week later to discuss corresponding measures and proposed launching a new bond purchase program in July. A month later, on July 21, the European Central Bank announced a 50 basis point rate hike, and at the same time launched a new bond purchase \"Transmission Protection Instrument\" (TPI) to prevent the problem of \"fragmentation\" from worsening.</p><p><b>The current debt repayment pressure is controllable, but if core countries such as Germany and France are unable to survive due to economic problems during the 2023 debt repayment peak, the ECB's bailout effect may be greatly reduced, and the European debt problem will also face uncertainty.</b>The five PIIGS countries had a total outstanding debt of approximately €350 billion in 2022, compared to the current available funds of approximately €360 billion in the European Stability Mechanism (ESM), indicating that short-term risks are temporarily under control. However, heavily indebted countries will see a peak in debt repayment in 2023, with approximately 561.3 billion euros due in the five PIIGs, of which Italy accounts for 63%. The amount of debt repayment is huge, and the risks should not be underestimated. Judging from the ECB's current statements, the details of the newly launched TPI are still rather vague, such as requiring applicant countries to meet four basic requirements, including 1) compliance with the EU fiscal framework; 2) There are no serious macroeconomic imbalances; 3) Fiscal and public debt sustainability; 4) Macroeconomic policies are sound and sustainable.</p><p>From another perspective, if the current TPI targeted bond purchase method is similar to the bond purchase policy of the Treasury Bond Market Direct Purchase (OMT) program in the secondary market during the European debt period, it may need to comply with the principles of the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF) and the European Stability Mechanism (ESM): the loan guarantee amount is 165% of the capital contribution amount, with Germany and France, the countries that contribute the most, bearing approximately 27% and 21% respectively. Considering that the EU provided €60 billion in bailout funds during the European debt crisis, and the IMF provided €240 billion in bailout funds, assuming that the EU and the IMF provide equal bailout funds, the remaining debt is spread over three years, requiring €150 million to be repaid annually. Germany and France would need to contribute €668.2 billion and €519.8 billion respectively annually over three years to repay the debt. These funds would account for approximately 18.7% and 16.2% of Germany's and France's GDP respectively, placing a heavy burden on core countries.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e8f37bb4992a0c0655c979378becf817\" tg-width=\"733\" tg-height=\"749\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>4) Market sentiment has improved somewhat after the ECB's action.</b>Despite panic in market sentiment following the European Central Bank's announcement of July rate hike, Italy's FTSE MIB index fell 6% to 22,547.48. In the week that followed, the European Central Bank held an emergency meeting, and the stock market rebounded, with Italy's FTSE MIB index rising 2%. On July 21, the European Central Bank raised rate hike by 50 basis points, exceeding expectations, and launched a new TPI bond purchase program. The market reaction was less strong than expected, with Italy's FTSE MIB index closing slightly higher by 0.65% on the second day.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4477efa53d7022dd5b39eb52c670e582\" tg-width=\"730\" tg-height=\"494\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>5) In this round of risk, the proportion of foreign holdings of Treasury Bond in Eurozone countries has decreased slightly.</b>Therefore, the risk of foreign capital \"fleeing\" during a crisis, leading to a chain reaction of soaring Treasury Bond rates, is slightly reduced. Taking Spain and Portugal as examples, as of the end of last year, 74% and 82% of their Treasury Bond were held by domestic commercial banks and non-bank institutions, respectively, while in 2011 only about 64% and 67% of their Treasury Bond were held by domestic capital, respectively. The Italian, Greek, and Irish holdings in Treasury Bond during the current and European debt crisis are basically the same as they were during the European debt crisis.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e19d650708bc4e5d23e75e4068f23949\" tg-width=\"482\" tg-height=\"357\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c36208dc67aed06319c7fcc15cd42435\" tg-width=\"477\" tg-height=\"358\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>3.2.2. Compared to the current worsening of the European debt crisis: rising debt levels and economic pressure may lead to a decrease in bailout capacity.</b></p><p><b>Comparing the current situation with the European debt crisis in 2010, we have found five points of deterioration:</b></p><p><b>1) The economic pressure facing the Eurozone has increased significantly compared to the previous round. Germany, the \"economic locomotive\" of the Eurozone, has experienced its first trade deficit of 1 billion euros in 30 years, reducing its ability to provide crisis relief.</b>During the European debt crisis, the most significant external shock was the 2008 global economic crisis, which resulted in zero global GDP growth for the first time. Compared to this round of risks, the average GDP growth rate in the past two years has been 3%, which is weaker than the economic level before the European debt crisis. The Eurozone is facing its most severe geopolitical crisis since World War II, with the Geopolitical Risk Index (GPR) at an all-time high, above 300. In addition, Europe, which has long relied on Russian imports, has been affected by the Russia-Ukraine conflict, causing its natural gas, oil, electricity and consumer goods prices to surge to $34.35 per million British thermal units.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a65c581f52939de86298cb6811327bd8\" tg-width=\"484\" tg-height=\"352\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c730055545b283140c09b818d316c89c\" tg-width=\"481\" tg-height=\"354\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8f8357be18d5dce44af50c9c351e1de7\" tg-width=\"482\" tg-height=\"388\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/31ce2e58fbfb8e2b9cfd2024a149fbcc\" tg-width=\"477\" tg-height=\"383\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>2) Eurozone countries are currently facing unprecedentedly high inflationary pressures.</b>Eurozone inflation is gradually approaching and rising, now far exceeding the level before European debt, with the harmonized CPI (HICP) reaching a year-on-year high of 8.6%, the highest level in history. Furthermore, the dual structure of separating fiscal and monetary policies among Eurozone countries has not changed, and the fact that \"fragmentation\" and unbalanced development among Eurozone countries have not improved also poses resistance to inflation regulation.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/29a7cb88bc64070c0b1c07beead5e0e2\" tg-width=\"480\" tg-height=\"356\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/de2092286c9ee47d57e20c21d52bf088\" tg-width=\"481\" tg-height=\"364\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>3) The Eurozone's debt level remains high.</b>The debt-to-GDP ratio of the peripheral countries of the Eurozone is close to and exceeds the level of 2009, and the outstanding government debt balance has gradually increased from 600 billion euros during the European debt period to 1 trillion euros now.</p><p><b>4) The euro fell to a record low, and capital outflows continued.</b>In this round of debt risk, the euro has weakened compared to the European debt period. The euro has historically reached a high of 1.6 against the US dollar and a low of 1.2 during the European debt period. Now that the euro has weakened, the euro has fallen below 1:1 against the US dollar, reaching a historical low.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5179b7a9e5ea3281459cc2ce33ca324c\" tg-width=\"480\" tg-height=\"367\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1d46dde1623095785c85d21ee8e864a8\" tg-width=\"478\" tg-height=\"363\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>5) The proportion of peripheral country bonds held by European commercial banks increased by 5%.</b>During the European debt crisis, Eurozone commercial banks held a large number of heavily indebted countries in Treasury Bond. As a result of the soaring Treasury Bond yields caused by the downgrade of sovereign credit ratings, European commercial banks gradually collapsed, and capital pressure suddenly increased. In this round of risks, commercial banks have increased their holdings of sovereign bonds of Eurozone countries, posing greater capital risks to banks. Taking Portugal as an example, the proportion of Portuguese sovereign debt held by major European commercial banks to the country's sovereign debt has increased by about 5% compared to the European debt era.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c2a22935ad810cdb8c0a9b8cd2f310a0\" tg-width=\"728\" tg-height=\"461\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>3.3. The effectiveness of the ECB's TPI implementation is of paramount importance; pay attention to liquidity and credit indicator early warnings.</b></p><p>To avoid shocks to the Eurozone bond market during central bank rate hike, the European Central Bank, while announcing a 50 basis point rate hike, launched the \"Transmission Protection Instrument (TPI)\" to target and unlimited new bond purchase programs. This aims to control the borrowing costs of heavily indebted Eurozone governments such as Italy, transmit monetary policy to all Eurozone countries, and avoid exacerbating the problem of \"fragmentation.\" However, it is worth noting that, unlike in 2011, Germany, the \"locomotive\" of the European economy, is also suffering from an economic recession, which may greatly reduce its enthusiasm for the ECB's bailout plan. Whether the bailout capacity, which accounted for about 21% of the ESM bailout plan during the European debt crisis, can be continued is also worth paying attention to.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/44bf00b93ba00cdcc63429155976e045\" tg-width=\"730\" tg-height=\"516\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>Since the European debt problem is essentially caused by credit defaults and liquidity runs, liquidity and credit indicators have a certain warning effect:</b></p><p>1) Liquidity indicators, such as the Euro LIBOR-OIS spread approaching 0.5%, should be taken seriously, as there may be chain debt risk exposure caused by insufficient interbank liquidity.</p><p>2) Credit indicators, such as when the credit default swap rate (CDS) is above 150, indicate that the market is concerned about sovereign credit risk.</p><p>3) The interest rate spread between the core and peripheral countries of the Eurozone has widened to more than 300 basis points. Italy may be the \"first domino\" in this round of European debt problems. The spread between Italian, German, and Italian 10-year Treasury Bond yields is gradually widening to over 200 basis points. If the spread gradually approaches the 300 basis points of the 2010 European debt crisis, we should be vigilant.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/768567bc6fe0f18d58e5569515433dc8\" tg-width=\"483\" tg-height=\"343\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aed5c286d9ae323db5bab55def20c9a1\" tg-width=\"482\" tg-height=\"346\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>4. The European debt problem presents a \"crisis coexisting\" for my country.</b></p><p><b>4.1. European turmoil affects Sino-European trade in the short term, but the Chinese market is becoming increasingly important for revitalizing the European economy.</b></p><p><b>The EU is my country's second-largest trading partner, and the pressure on the European economy may lead to a slowdown in my country's import and export growth.</b>In 2021, my country's exports to the EU reached US$518.661 billion, accounting for 15.42% of the total. Imports amounted to US$309.931 billion, accounting for 11.54%. The potential debt problems in the Eurozone may subsequently impact China's imports and exports. Historically, when the Eurozone is under significant economic pressure, such as during the 2008 subprime mortgage crisis, the 2010 European debt crisis, and the impact of the 2020 pandemic, my country's imports and exports with the EU have all turned from positive to negative year-on-year, which has also greatly dragged down my country's import and export trade. Under the impact of the last round of European debt, from Q1 2011 to Q3 2012, the Eurozone manufacturing PMI declined from 57.93 to 45.07. During the same period, my country's export growth rate fell from 26.42% to 4.43%, and its import growth rate fell from 32.99% to 1.39%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6b59ac53cd28cc68ff5dea567184430e\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"750\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/60c61d802f396d39129ace35cf2af81e\" tg-width=\"480\" tg-height=\"344\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p><b>From an industry perspective, power equipment, electronics, and basic chemicals are highly dependent on Sino-European trade.</b>In terms of exports, the power equipment industry accounts for the largest share, reaching 41.24%, with motors accounting for 18.91%, power equipment accounting for 19.79%, and power grid equipment accounting for 2.55%. From the perspective of domestic imports, the power equipment industry accounts for the largest share, reaching 46.20%, of which motors account for 21.37%, power equipment accounts for 22.25%, and power grid equipment accounts for 2.58%.</p><p><b>At the individual stock level, the top 100 companies in terms of overseas business scale or proportion are mainly concentrated in the electronics, home appliance and pharmaceutical sectors.</b>Among the 100 A-share listed companies with the largest overseas business revenue, 18 have electronics subsidiaries, including 8 consumer electronics companies, 3 optoelectronics companies, and 4 semiconductor companies. There are 7 listed home appliance companies, including 3 black appliance companies and 4 white goods companies. Among the 100 A-share listed companies with the highest proportion of overseas business revenue, 17 are in the pharmaceutical and biological industry, including 14 medical device companies, 2 chemical pharmaceutical companies, and 1 medical service company. There are 14 companies in the electronics industry, including 8 consumer electronics companies, 2 optoelectronics companies, and 2 listed semiconductor companies.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4a02a7a7c245df32957dee0f005e2e48\" tg-width=\"783\" tg-height=\"761\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>The economic pressure brought about by the European debt crisis may increase the EU's trade dependence on my country, and attention should be paid to the possibility of restarting the China-EU agreement in the future.</b>In terms of the content of the China-EU agreement, it mainly revolves around three aspects: market opening, fair competition, and investment protection. The first aspect is market opening, emphasizing that both sides will relax market access. In this regard, China has made unprecedented access commitments in many industries. The second aspect is fair competition, with both parties jointly committing to respecting intellectual property rights, improving labor standards, perfecting standard setting, and maintaining market order. The third aspect is investment protection. Both parties protect each other's investments, ensure a fair and transparent investment environment, and guarantee clear and transparent regulatory procedures. In May 2021, the European Parliament passed a resolution to freeze the China-EU investment agreement, thus shelving the agreement. However, as the Chinese market becomes increasingly important to revitalizing the European economy, Sino-European relations are expected to warm up.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b944fbbc17b4fb6aa6d5e8e4ade8453\" tg-width=\"619\" tg-height=\"484\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>4.2. With RMB substitution and diverging fundamentals, the Chinese stock, bond, and currency markets are expected to experience independent trends.</b></p><p><b>The escalating European debt crisis will trigger a \"risk-off\" mode for global financial assets, and the A-share market will not be immune in the short term. However, in the long run, the increase in the proportion of RMB as a reserve currency will boost the exchange rate and asset value.</b>Since 2022, the US dollar has appreciated by 8.9% against other countries and the RMB by 6.3% against the European Union and Japan, respectively. Behind this round of currency appreciation is the competitive rotation of international reserve currencies; As the proportion of the RMB in international monetary reserves continues to increase, the RMB and related assets will continue to appreciate in the future.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fad3d766fb509c5abb4d068ed0a422ed\" tg-width=\"576\" tg-height=\"428\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/71a4770a0219ba65c4bb0323636807af\" tg-width=\"576\" tg-height=\"423\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p></body></html></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/_vDwqOA1KUM4bEpA0I7haQ\">李美岑投资策略</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d1e44b706229c298db732256920d2ace","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/_vDwqOA1KUM4bEpA0I7haQ","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1100128143","content_text":"欧央行加入全球紧缩潮，欧债魅影缠绕意大利。为了阻止通胀和欧元走势进一步恶化，欧央行于7月21日晚超预期加息50BP，欧元区告别为期八年的负利率时代，后续9月、10月以及12月都存在继续收水的可能。作为债务负担较重的欧猪五国一员，意大利最危险：1）2019年以来债务持续高增，当前在欧猪五国中债务占比接近六成；2）经济状况也在恶化，2018年新政府上台并未带来经济的改善，2019年以来GDP增速继续下滑至0%；3）民粹主义横行、通胀压力加剧均带来经济稳定性下降。2020年年底，意大利失业率高达9.15%。欧央行宣布加息后，意大利10年期国债收益率当即飙升至4.14%，德意两国利差也持续扩大至236BP左右，逐步接近2010年欧债危机时期水平。历史上来看，信用评级下调和欧央行加息是欧债危机加剧的重要推手。如果我们以希腊和葡萄牙10年期国债收益率在欧债危机期间的表现为例，四轮主权信用评级下调、两轮欧央行加息后，两个国10年期国债都出现120-160BP的跳升，是流动性挤兑加剧的“幕后黑手”。实际上，在2010年9月底希腊宣布财政问题时，希腊10年期国债收益率的跳升幅度仅20BP，远低于评级下调期间。此外，以德国为代表的欧洲核心国并未及时援助，直至2010年中才开始建立欧盟危机治理机制，导致欧债引发的流动性挤兑从边缘国蔓延至以法国为代表的核心国。短期风险可控，长期来看欧央行TPI的实施效果是重中之重，关注流动性指标和信用指标预警。欧猪五国在2022年未偿债务共计约3500亿欧元，对比当下欧洲稳定机制（ESM）可支配资金约3600亿欧元，短期风险暂时可控。但2023年偿债高峰下，欧猪五国到期规模约5613亿欧元，其中意大利就占据了63%，偿债体量巨大。当前推出的TPI定向购债工具尽管不设购买上限，但在具体实施细节上仍较为模糊。若德法等核心国因经济问题“自身难保”，欧央行的救助效果可能大打折扣，欧债问题也面临不确定。由于欧债问题本质上由信用违约和流动性挤兑造成的，后续持续关注流动性指标（LIBOR-OIS利差）与信用指标（信用违约互换利率CDS与德国-意大利10年期国债利差）。欧债问题对我国来说“危机并存”。经济层面，欧盟是我国第二大贸易伙伴，欧洲经济承压可能会导致我国进出口增速放缓，上一轮欧债冲击下，我国的出口增速从26.42%下至4.43%，进口增速从32.99%下跌至1.39%；另一方面，欧债问题带来的经济压力，可能会提升欧盟对我国贸易依赖度，未来应关注中欧协定的重启可能性。金融层面，欧债问题发酵将使全球金融资产开启“Risk Off”模式，A股市场短期也无法独善其身。但长期看，人民币替代+基本面分化，中国市场股债汇有望走出独立行情。风险提示：地缘政治危机；海外加息超预期；疫情扩散超预期。正文1.欧央行加入全球紧缩潮，欧债违约担忧再起1.1.通胀压力屡创新高，欧元区“负利率时代”成为历史俄乌冲突引发的油价攀升，导致欧元区通胀历史新高，巨额贸易逆差也使欧元跌至20年以来新低。欧盟进口的石油约有30%来自于俄罗斯。在经历了年初俄乌冲突导致的供应链紧张，以及欧美5月对俄实施部分原油禁运后，欧盟从俄罗斯进口的原油相比去年已下降20%，供需缺口持续仍在扩大。欧元区当前的通胀水平已达到8.6%，处于成立以来的历史新高；而剔除能源、食品等因素后的核心CPI为3.7%，这也显示了能源价格对于欧元区的显著影响。能源价格带来的进口成本推升以及外需疲弱，欧元区出现了成立以来最庞大的贸易逆差（324亿欧元），连欧洲经济“火车头”德国也在5月出现了30年以来首次贸易逆差的情况。为了阻止通胀和欧元走势进一步恶化，欧央行加入全球“收水模式”，欧元区告别为期八年的负利率时代。自98年成立以来，欧洲央行以通货膨胀率为核心变量调整货币政策。2021年7月，欧洲央行调整了货币政策调控策略，货币政策目标由原来的“低于但接近2%”变为2%的对称目标。如今欧元区的通货膨胀率已远超2%的目标，基于此，欧央行在7月21日晚宣布加息50个基点，至此，为期8年的欧元区负利率在第三季度前结束。此外，提振欧元汇率也是欧央行考虑加息的目的之一。当前由于巨额贸易逆差，欧元兑美元已跌破1：1，处于二十年以来新低，而在欧央行加息50BP后，欧元兑美元跳升90点。1.2.加息推升负债成本，欧债魅影缠绕意大利欧洲各国债务水平在2010年欧债危机后仍持续走高，此次加息可能会因推高借贷成本，进一步触发边缘国的违约风险。以“欧猪五国”为例，当下债务负担早已超过2010年欧债危机时的水平。其中，希腊国家债务占GDP比例接近200%，意大利，西班牙和葡萄牙紧随其后，国家债务占GDP比例在120%附近波动。欧央行在7月开启第一次加息后，9月、10月以及12月都存在继续收水的可能。未来欧元区各国偿债利息将会非线性跃升，加息计划将使重债国面临因借贷成本升高而出现债务危机的潜在风险。意大利可能是本次欧债问题中最危险的“易燃品”。2019年以来，意大利债务持续高增，未来10年未偿债务规模超过2万亿欧元，在欧猪五国中占比接近六成。同时经济状况也在恶化，2018年新政府上台并未带来经济的改善，2019年GDP增速继续下滑至0%，此后疫情对服务业的冲击也使意大利经济受损严重。此外，民粹主义横行、通胀压力加剧均带来经济稳定性下降。2020年年底，意大利失业率高达9.15%。欧央行宣布加息后，市场普遍担忧意大利将成为此次欧债违约的第一个“炸弹”，意大利10年期国债收益率当即飙升至4.14%，德意两国利差也持续扩大至236BP左右，逐步接近2010年欧债危机时期水平。2.欧债危机的本质是整个欧元区的流动性挤兑欧债危机是2008年次贷危机的衍生。内生增长较弱的南欧在制造业空心化的经济结构下，常年以房地产和旅游业维持本国经济的“虚假繁荣”。次贷危机带来的地产和旅游景气急速回落，切断了南欧的收入来源。爱尔兰、西班牙等国的银行由于形成了大量的地产债务坏账，不得不向政府求助。以爱尔兰为例，当地政府向金融体系注入了至少700亿欧元，超过当时GDP的一半规模，这也导致了政府在后续欧债冲击下无力举债、不得不向IMF求助的困境。2.1.欧元区内部交叉持有国债的背景下，评级下调成为“火烧连营”的触发点2008年次贷危机将希腊推上“绝路”，希腊评级下调是推导欧债危机的第一块“多米诺骨牌”。08年次贷危机后，对外依存度较高的希腊无法再享受出口和房地产带来的经济红利。同时，由于欧央行把控了货币和汇率的主导权，希腊无法通过独立的宽松货币或者汇率贬值的方式来刺激经济，唯有选择大发国债、扩大财政支出。2009年10月初，新上任的希腊财政部长宣布前任政府债务作假，实际上当时的财政赤字和公共债务占GDP的比例高达12.7%和113%，已经远超欧盟规定的3%和60%。12月，三大评级机构纷纷下调希腊主权信用评级，并且给予负面展望，直接导致希腊10年期国债出现飙升，与德国的利差显著走阔，恐慌情绪充满着市场。葡萄牙、爱尔兰 、西班牙以及意大利的接连“暴雷”，逐步将债务危机从欧元区边缘国引向核心国。“欧猪五国”的暴雷方式有所不同，葡萄牙紧随希腊也提高了实际财政赤字至8%，市场担忧其无法平安渡过即将到来的偿债高峰，葡萄牙10年期国债从3.5%一度接近14.2%。对于爱尔兰来说，房地产泡沫则是“始作俑者”。08年次贷危机导致欧美地产受到冲击，爱尔兰政府为了拯救即将破产的五大银行，2010年财政赤字率将高达32%，公共债务占GDP比例高达100%，负债压力赶超希腊，本国10年期国债飚至9%。2011年10月，欧元区核心国家——法国被穆迪盯上，后者提出法国在3A评级国家中债务表现最弱，主权债务状况持续恶化。随后，意大利的公共债务占比攀升至120%，仅次于希腊水平，被评级机构陆续下调主权评级。由于意大利、法国以及西班牙在欧元区国债市场的规模占比高达55%，远高于希腊、爱尔兰与葡萄牙三国（合计仅7%），欧债问题在2011年底已从局部冲击演变成为整个欧元区的危机。同时，欧债危机还从主权国家升级至整个欧元区商业银行层面。欧元区商业银行交叉持有大量的“欧猪五国”国债，仅法国、德国、英国和葡萄牙四国商业银行对希腊的持有占比就超过1/3。随着一列主权信用等级下调带来的国债收益率飙升，整个欧洲商业银行都开始出现大规模的坏账计提，资本补充压力骤然提升。以比利时德克夏银行为例，欧债导致的流动性冲击使其无法解决超过200亿欧元的风险敞口，被迫成为首家倒下的银行。其他欧洲大型银行，诸如法兴银行、法国巴黎银行等也因持有大量希腊公债而被下调评级。2.2.迟来的救助措施也使得欧债的冲击超出控制以德国为代表的欧洲核心国并未及时援助，导致欧债危机进一步升级。实际上，在欧债危机初期仅希腊一国出现债务问题，但当时德国采取消极旁观态度，认为希腊首先应该对高福利与高赤字的社会结构进行改革，并不打算继续充当“取款机”的角色。2010年年初，默克尔政府还扬言将不遵守财政纪律的成员踢出欧元区，这一强硬态度加剧了市场恐慌，同样面对高债务问题的爱尔兰、葡萄牙以及意大利都被卷入其中。德国的强硬态度也提高了欧债危机的救助成本。德国在2010年年中认识到欧债危机的严重性，开始建立欧盟危机治理机制，但由于错过了最佳时机还是使整个欧元区付出了更高的成本。2010年5月，德国总理默克尔松口，愿意肩负维持欧元稳定的责任，最终决定向希腊提供1100亿欧元的三年期贷款和信用担保。但此时已经距离希腊事件冲击超过半年，欧债的连锁反应已出现失控。此后，欧洲央行不得不通过两轮三年期的长期再融资操作（LTROs）向市场注入超过1万亿欧元的流动性。欧洲央行推出证券市场计划（SMP），每周进行定期存款工具以对冲注入的流动性，截至2012年9月28日, 欧央行SMP计划下买入的政府债券存量为2088.3亿欧元。这一干预有效地将希腊10年期国债收益率降低8BP。欧洲央行通过在二级市场上购买主权债券（OMT），消除欧元的尾部风险，OMT以欧洲金融稳定基金（EFSF）及欧洲稳定机制（ESM）的宏观调整计划等救助计划为前提，购买1至3年期的主权债，无规模上限和收益率目标。2.3.欧债问题的核心矛盾在于欧元区货币统一，但财政不统一高福利支出迫使欧洲各国高度依赖发债，但对于经济内生增长较弱的边缘国来说无异于“饮鸩止渴”。欧洲以高福利著称全球，以意大利和希腊为例，两国在2009年社会福利支出占GDP比重高达21%，而同期美国和加拿大仅为14.66%和9.87%。与此同时，欧元区边缘国家产业结构不平衡，大多以房地产、服务为支柱产业，制造业空心化，不得不通过举债来拉动投资、刺激消费，以此来维持表面“祥和”但实际脆弱的经济。因此，欧债带来的偿债压力骤升不可避免地率先出现在高福利、高财政赤字的边缘国。早在2007年，希腊财政支出已达到GDP的6.7%，葡萄牙和西班牙也在GDP的5%左右，均超过欧元区警戒线。加入欧元区给予了希腊等边缘国一定的背书，使其能够以低成本“搭便车”的方式来扩大财政赤字。边缘国家由于经济欠发达，在未加入欧元区之前的借债成本显著高于德法这样的核心国家。但加入欧元后，市场认为整个欧元区中各国的信用水平一致。在2010年欧债爆发之前，经济状况欠缺的南部国家与经济发展完善的北部国家在10年期国债的收益率水平都为5%左右，显示了市场对于欧元区“莫须有”的信心，因而经济较弱的边缘国可以凭借欧元区外壳获得高信用评级，以更低的成本大肆举债。一直以来，以德国为首的核心国家成为资本输出国，而“欧猪五国”这样的边缘国家成为资本流入国，存在长期的贸易逆差。在无法通过货币政策来调控经济的背景下，欧元区边缘国只能依赖财政刺激，最终导致债务“滚雪球”失控。欧盟成员国的货币政策由欧洲央行统一制定，后者在成立以来的重点是保持欧元的稳定，并没有对于金融市场的管理义务。换一句话说，当市场需要扩张性货币政策来调控经济时，欧央行在优先考虑到欧元贬值的情况并不会出手稳定金融环境。但随着欧债影响范围的扩大，欧央行在2011年底不得不充当“最后贷款人”的角色，通过公开市场操作给予流动性补充。以德国为例，德意志联邦银行通过欧央行的TARGET-2系统提供了近5000亿欧元的贷款，以此来降低欧元区重债国银行的偿付压力。2.4.国际资本在欧债中起到了“推波助澜”的作用华尔街早在2000年初就盯上了“举债度日”的希腊。1999年，希腊因为条件不符而被欧洲经济货币同盟拒之门外：《马斯特里赫特条约》规定欧元区成员国要满足两个条件：第一，各国必须将年度赤字控制在GDP占比的3%以下；第二，各国国债占GDP总值须在60%以下。希腊以欧元兑美元1比1的汇率与高盛签订货币掉期交易（当时欧元兑美元汇率大致为1：0.9），这一“恶魔的约定”为希腊政府掩饰了一笔高达10亿欧元的公共债务，使希腊赤字从账面上看仅为GDP的1.5％（实际为4.1%），希腊账面上符合成为欧元区成员国的标准，2001年加入欧元区。但是财政作假仅仅只能掩盖问题，债务本身并不会消失。相反，希腊不得不制造更多的货币掉期交易掩饰债务和赤字，这加重了希腊的债务负担，使希腊深陷债务漩涡无法自拔。除了赚取高额的佣金报酬以外，国际投行还通过金融衍生品将欧元区核心国家绑上了“贼船”。高盛在完成与希腊的交易后，向德国银行购买了20年期的10亿欧元信用违约互换（CDS）来对冲希腊国债风险，以便在希腊债务出现支付问题时由承保方补足亏空。由于德国是欧元区最大的经济实体，此举相当于将德国绑在了希腊的“债务巨轮”上。如果希腊政府出现支付危机，债务链条断裂，德国将不得不为10亿欧元债务买单。3.欧债“明斯基时刻”将至？欧央行出手，短期风险可控3.1.信用评级下调和欧央行加息是2010年欧债危机加剧的重要推手如果我们以希腊和葡萄牙10年期国债收益率在欧债危机期间的表现为例，四轮主权信用评级下调、两轮欧央行加息后，两个国10年期国债都出现120-160BP的跳升，是流动性挤兑加剧的“幕后黑手”。实际上，在2010年9月底希腊宣布财政问题时，希腊10年期国债收益率的跳升幅度仅20BP，远低于评级下调期间。此外，欧洲央行误判形势，过早收紧货币政策，为欧债危机再添一把火。2011年4月，欧洲央行决定结束对边缘国的紧急救助，将存款便利利率由0.25%提高到0.50%，并在7月再次加息至75BP，致使欧债危机进一步恶化，希腊国债收益率飙升至30%左右，升高约50%，2011年11月，欧洲央行重新开始降息救助措施，再加之非传统救助工具的补救，欧元区经济逐渐有所好转。3.2.欧债危机与当前十点比较：短期风险可控，后续关注欧央行“碎片化”方案效果当前并未出现2010年主权信用评级大规模下调的情况，欧元区控制风险能力增强，短期来看欧债风险仍处于可控范围。尤其是欧央行在当前显著吸取上一轮欧债冲击期间没有及时出手的“教训”，已提前为市场打“预防针”且准备好救助方案，一定程度上缓解了投资者目前的担忧。但由于当前欧洲面临的通胀、经济以及地缘问题等方面的压力显著高于2010年，欧债的前景仍不明朗，我们认为后续欧央行“碎片化”方案TPI的实施效果仍然是重点。3.2.1.当前相较欧债危机的改善：风险承受能力、应对速度均有所提升对比当下与2010年欧债危机期间，我们发现五点改善：1）偿债成本下降。尽管当前政府债务规模进一步高企，但未偿还债务的平均利率有所降低。2011年欧债期间，希腊未偿还债务平均利率高达4.69%，而当前，欧元区各国未偿还平均利率皆低于3.50%，在3%左右波动。2）坏账率下降、资本充足率提升。从抵御风险能力看，本轮风险欧元区国家坏账率均处于10%以下，资本充足率高于10%，欧债期间希腊资本充足率低于0%，坏账率高于47%，相较2010年欧债危机，欧洲经济体在此轮危机中有更好的抵御风险能力。3）欧央行经过2011年欧债危机，当前更有应对经验。欧洲央行行长拉加德在欧债危机时期担任IMF总裁，是解决欧债危机的“麻烦终结者”。在宣布7月加息后，为了应对市场在欧央行提出货币收紧计划之后出现的显著担忧，时隔一周欧洲央行即召开紧急会议讨论对应措施，提出在7月推出新债券购买计划的提案。随后1个月，欧央行于7月21日宣布加息50BP，与此同时，推出新债券购买“传导保护机制”（TPI：Transmission Protection Instrument）以防止“碎片化”问题加剧。当前偿债压力可控，但23年偿债高峰下，若德法等核心国因经济问题“自身难保”，欧央行的救助效果可能大打折扣，欧债问题也面临不确定。欧猪五国在2022年未偿债务共计约3500亿欧元，对比当下欧洲稳定机制（ESM）可支配资金约3600亿欧元，短期风险暂时可控。但2023年重债国将迎来偿债高峰，欧猪五国到期规模约5613亿欧元，其中意大利占就据了63%，偿债体量巨大，风险不容小觑。从当前欧央行的表态来看，此次推出的TPI在细节上仍比较模糊，例如要求申请国满足四项基本要求，包括1）遵守欧盟财政框架；2）没有严重的宏观经济失衡；3）财政与公共债务可持续；4）宏观经济政策健全且可持续。另一个角度来看，如果当前TPI定向购债的方式类似于欧债期间二级市场国债直接购买计划（OMT）的购债政策，可能需要符合欧洲金融稳定基金（EFSF）和欧洲稳定机制（ESM）的原则：贷款担保额度为出资额度的165%，出资最多的国家德国和法国将各自承担约27%和21%。考虑到欧债危机期间欧盟救助提供救助资金600亿欧元，IMF提供2400亿欧元救助资金，假设此次欧盟和IMF给出同等救助，剩余债务分摊至3年还清，每年需要偿还1.5亿欧元，德、法需要在3年内每年各自出资6682亿欧元和5198亿欧元才能偿还债务，这笔资金将分别约占据德国和法国GDP18.7%和16.2%，为核心国家带来沉重的负担。4）市场情绪在欧央行行动后有所回暖。尽管在欧洲央行宣布7月加息后，市场情绪出现恐慌，意大利富时MIB指数下跌6%至22,547.48。此后一周内，欧洲央行召开紧急会议，股市有所回暖，意大利富时MIB指数上涨2%。7月21日，欧洲央行超预期加息50BP，并推出的TPI新债券购买计划。市场反应不如预期激烈，意大利富时MIB指数在第二天小幅收涨0.65%。5）本轮风险外国持有欧元区国家国债占比稍有降低。因此，发生危机时外国资本“跑路“而造成国债率飙升的连锁反应的危险略微减弱。以西班牙和葡萄牙为例，截至去年年底，西班牙和葡萄牙国债的74%被和82%分别本国商业银行和非银行机构持有，在2011年时期其国债仅64%和67%左右分别被本国资本持有。而意大利、希腊和爱尔兰在当前和欧债危机中国债持有比例与欧债危机期间基本一致。3.2.2.当前相较欧债危机的恶化：债务规模攀升，经济承压可能导致救助能力下降对比当下与2010年欧债危机期间，我们发现五点恶化：1）当下欧元区面临的经济压力相较上一轮显著提升，作为欧元区“经济火车头“的德国，出现三十年以来的首次贸易逆差10亿欧元，对危机救助能力下降。欧债危机时期，最主要的外部冲击因素是08年全球经济危机，全球GDP出现首次零增速，对比此轮风险，近两年GDP平均增速3%，比欧债前经济水平更弱。欧元区面临自二战以来最严峻的地缘政治危机，地缘政治风险指数（GPR）处历年高位，高于300；此外，长期依靠俄罗斯进口的欧洲遭受俄乌冲突波及，其天然气、石油、电力及消费品价格大涨至34.35美元/百万英热单位。2）欧元区国家当前面临空前的高通胀压力。欧元区通胀水平逐渐靠近走高，现远高于欧债之前的水平，调和CPI（HICP）同比高达8.6%，达历史最高水平。此外，欧元区国家之间财政、货币政策分离的二元结构没有改变，欧元区国家之间“碎片化”和不平衡的发展没有得到改善的事实也为通胀调节带来阻力。3）欧元区债务规模仍在高位。欧元区边缘国国家债务占GDP比例接近并超过2009年时的水平，政府未偿还债务余额也从欧债期间的6千亿欧元逐渐上升到现在的1万亿欧元。4）欧元跌至历史新低，资本外流持续。在本轮债务风险中，欧元较欧债期间走弱，欧元兑美元在历史上最高为1.6，在欧债期间最低为1.2，如今欧元走弱，欧元兑美元跌破1：1，处历史最低点。5）欧洲商业银行持有的边缘国债券占比提升5%。欧债危机时欧元区商业银行交叉持有大量的重债国国债，在主权信用等级下调带来的国债收益率飙升的恶果下，欧洲商业银行逐渐崩盘，资本压力骤然提升。在此轮风险中，商业银行持有欧元区内国家主权债的比重上升，银行面临更大的资本风险。以葡萄牙为例，欧洲主要商业银行持有葡萄牙主权债务占该国主权债务比例比欧债时期增加了5%左右。3.3.欧央行TPI的实施效果是重中之重，关注流动性指标和信用指标预警为了避免欧元区债券市场在央行加息时遭受冲击，欧洲央行在宣布加息50BP的同时，推出“传输保护工具（TPI）”来定向且不限规模的新债购买计划，以控制意大利等负债累累的欧元区政府的借贷成本，将货币政策传递到所有欧元区国家，避免“碎片化”问题加剧。但值得注意的是，与2011年不同，由于此次欧洲经济“火车头”—德国也饱受经济衰退的困扰，对于此次欧央行救助计划的积极性可能会大打折扣，在欧债危机中出资占ESM救助计划资金约21%的救助能力是否能够延续也值得后续关注。由于欧债问题本质上由信用违约和流动性挤兑造成的，流动性指标与信用指标具备一定示警作用：1）流动性指标，例如欧元LIBOR-OIS利差逼近0.5%时应该引起警惕，可能存在银行间流动性不足导致的连锁债务风险暴露。2）信用指标，例如当信用违约互换利率CDS高于150，预示着市场对于主权信用风险产生担忧。3）欧元区核心国家与边缘国家的利差走阔至300BP以上。意大利可能是本轮欧债问题的“第一块多米诺骨牌” ，意大利德国意大利10年期国债收益率利差逐渐走阔至200BP以上，若利差逐渐逼近2010年欧债危机时期的300BP，应加以警觉。4.欧债问题对我国来说“危机并存”4.1.欧洲动荡短期影响中欧贸易，但中国市场对于重振欧洲经济而言重要性增强欧盟是我国第二大贸易伙伴，欧洲经济承压可能会导致我国进出口增速放缓。2021年我国对欧盟出口规模达5186.61亿美元，占比15.42%；进口金额为3099.31亿美元，占比11.54%。欧元区潜在的债务问题后续可能会对中国进出口产生影响。历史上来看，当欧元区经济压力较大时，例如2008年次贷危机、2010年欧债危机以及2020年疫情冲击期间，我国与欧盟的进出口同比均出现了由正转负的情况，同时也对我国进出口贸易也产生极大拖累。上一轮欧债冲击下，从2011年Q1到2012年Q3，欧元区的制造业PMI从57.93下滑至45.07，同期我国的出口增速从26.42%下至4.43%，进口增速从32.99%下跌至1.39%。行业层面来看，电力设备、电子以及基础化工对于中欧贸易的依赖较高。对外出口角度来看，电力设备行业占比最高，占比高达41.24%，其中电机占比18.91%、电源设备占比19.79%、电网设备占比2.55%；对内进口角度而言，电力设备行业占比最高，占比高达46.20%，其中电机占比21.37%、电源设备占比22.25%、电网设备占比2.58%。个股层面来看，海外业务规模或占比排名前100的公司主要集中在电子、家电以及医药领域。海外业务收入规模最大的100家A股上市公司中，有18家电子公司，包括8家消费电子、3家光学光电子和4家半导体公司；有7家家电上市公司，包括3家黑电、4家白电企业。海外业务收入占比最高的100家A股上市公司中，医药生物行业的公司有17家，包括14家医疗器械、2家化学制药以及1家医疗服务；电子行业的公司有14家，包括8家消费电子、2家光学光电子以及2家半导体上市公司。欧债问题带来的经济压力，可能会提升欧盟对我国贸易依赖度，未来应关注中欧协定的重启可能性。就中欧协定内容来看，主要围绕市场开放、公平竞争和投资保护三个方面展开。第一方面是市场开放，强调双方放宽市场准入，在这一方面中国在多个行业给出了前所未有的的准入承诺；第二方面是公平竞争，双方共同承诺尊重知识产权、改善劳工标准、完善标准制定和维护市场秩序；第三方面是投资保护，双方保护相互投资，确保投资环境公平透明、保障监管程序清晰明了。2021年5月，欧洲议会通过了冻结中欧投资协定的议案，中欧协定就此搁置。但随着中国市场对于重振欧洲经济而言重要性增强，中欧关系有望回暖。4.2.人民币替代+基本面分化，中国市场股债汇有望走出独立行情欧债问题发酵将使全球金融资产开启“Risk Off”模式，A股市场短期也无法独善其身。但长期看，人民币的储备货币占比增加抬升汇率和资产价值。22年以来，美元对各国、人民币兑欧日分别升值8.9%、6.3%。这一轮货币升值背后是国际储备货币的竞争轮替；随着人民币在国际货币储备中占比不断提升，未来人民币及相关资产也将持续升值。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4435,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9074636978,"gmtCreate":1658357454094,"gmtModify":1676536144188,"author":{"id":"3576195246415673","authorId":"3576195246415673","name":"Jefflau749","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3b16bea38b728770eeacee83d0ca1b56","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576195246415673","authorIdStr":"3576195246415673"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"ya","listText":"ya","text":"ya","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9074636978","repostId":"1163029397","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4812,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9075890181,"gmtCreate":1658184629543,"gmtModify":1676536116377,"author":{"id":"3576195246415673","authorId":"3576195246415673","name":"Jefflau749","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3b16bea38b728770eeacee83d0ca1b56","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576195246415673","authorIdStr":"3576195246415673"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"ya","listText":"ya","text":"ya","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9075890181","repostId":"1148974307","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1148974307","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1658111581,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1148974307?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-07-18 10:33","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"It's so curly! The top brokerage firm dismantled Tesla and wrote a 94-page report.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1148974307","media":"华尔街见闻","summary":"没拆过车，都不好意思说自己是电车分析师。卖方分析师“卷无止尽”......继上个月海通国际拆了一台比亚迪“元”，用87页研报展示汽车零部件的详细细节后，“券商一哥”中信证券拆了一台特斯拉Model 3","content":"<p><html><head></head><body>If you've never disassembled a car, you'd be embarrassed to call yourself a tram analyst. Sell-side analysts are \"scrolling endlessly\"...</p><p>Following Haitong International's disassembly of a BYD \"Yuan\" last month and its 87-page research report showcasing detailed details of auto parts, CITIC Securities, the \"top brokerage firm,\" disassembled a Tesla Model 3 and wrote a 94-page research report.</p><p>Over two months, CITIC Securities' research department's TMT and automotive teams, in collaboration with multiple companies and institutions, completed a complete disassembly of the standard range version of the Model 3.</p><p>CITIC Securities stated:</p><p>The aim is to analyze the Tesla Model 3, a benchmark model for intelligent electric vehicles, to showcase Tesla's thinking on the intelligent electrification of automobiles as a leading global automaker, in order to clarify the possible direction of future industrial development and better support relevant decisions. Through disassembly, CITIC Securities conducted a detailed and in-depth analysis of Tesla's E/E architecture, three batteries, thermal management, and vehicle body.</p><p>domain controller architecture</p><p>According to CITIC Securities, the E/E architecture has shifted from a distributed to a domain control architecture, and the decoupling of software and hardware is key to software-defined cars. Tesla's Model 3 is a leader in domain control architecture.</p><p><b>1) Body domain: The front, left and right three bodies use positional zoning rather than functional zoning to reduce wiring difficulty, and HSD is widely used to replace relays;</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bcaee1d0a80c502e4b0095b3c6d47cdb\" tg-width=\"907\" tg-height=\"329\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>The front body domain controllers are located in the front cabin, which theoretically has a higher probability of collision. Therefore, they use aluminum alloy protective housings. The left and right body domain controllers, being located inside the passenger compartment, have a lower probability of encountering external collisions, and both protective housings are made of plastic.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9e2e3ec0d88244cf0ba05df76dbf12e5\" tg-width=\"706\" tg-height=\"439\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>2) Cockpit Domain: Integrates the T-BOX into the cockpit domain controller and uses Intel's A3950 chip, which is closer to a gaming platform than a mobile phone;</b></p><p>The cockpit domain is an important part of the user experience, and Tesla's cockpit control platform is constantly evolving. The 2020 Tesla Model 3 that CITIC Securities disassembled this time uses the second-generation cockpit domain controller (MCU2):</p><p>The MCU2 consists of two circuit boards, one is the motherboard, and the other is a small wireless communication circuit board fixed to the motherboard (shown in the pink box in the figure). This communication circuit board includes an LTE module, an Ethernet control chip, an antenna interface, etc., which is equivalent to the T-box used for external wireless communication in traditional cars. Integrating it into the MCU can save space and costs. The 2020 Model 3 we're disassembling this time uses Telit's LTE module. After the 2021 model, Tesla switched its wireless module supplier to Quectel. The MCU2 motherboard uses a double-sided PCB, with the front side mainly containing various network-related chips, such as Ethernet chips from Intel and Marvell, LTE modules from Telit, and video serializers from TI. Another important function of the front is to provide external interfaces, such as Bluetooth/WiFi/LTE antenna interfaces, camera input/output interfaces, audio interfaces, USB interfaces, Ethernet interfaces, etc.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e974436a2dc5b19a849251a7c210317d\" tg-width=\"937\" tg-height=\"544\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>The back of the MCU2 is more important, with an Intel Atoma 3950 chip at its core, paired with a total of 4GB of Micron memory and a 64GB eMMC memory chip also provided by Micron. In addition, there are WiFi/Bluetooth modules provided by LGInnotek.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6f06009817e03dc2d31a3f14a908f486\" tg-width=\"906\" tg-height=\"499\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><b>3) Driving range: Dual FSD chips, NPU offers better cost performance than Orin in the same area, and the Linux operating system is more suitable for large AI models;</b></p><p>Another important feature of Tesla is its Intelligent Driving, which is performed through its Autopilot Domain Controller (AP). The core of this section lies in Tesla's self-developed FSD chip; the rest of the configuration is not essentially different from other current autonomous driving controller solutions:</p><p>The HW3.0 version of the AP used in the Model 3 is equipped with two FSD chips, each configured with four Samsung 2GB memory chips, for a total of 8GB per FSD. Each FSD is also equipped with a 32GB Toshiba flash memory chip and a 64MB Spansion NorFlash chip for booting. In terms of networking, the AP controller includes Marvell Ethernet switches and physical layer transceivers, as well as TI's high-speed CAN transceivers. Positioning is also very important for autonomous driving, which is why it is equipped with a Ublox GPS positioning module.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9938c812944cab9e51cd6ed7319bc668\" tg-width=\"905\" tg-height=\"457\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/760b93bcd8e51158df569a11580ab6dc\" tg-width=\"756\" tg-height=\"426\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>To achieve autonomous driving, Tesla has proposed a complete solution based on vision and centered on FSD chips:</p><p>Its peripheral sensors mainly include 12 ultrasonic sensors (Valeo), 8 cameras (3 front-facing cameras on the windshield roof, 2 front-facing cameras on the B-pillar, 2 rear-facing cameras on the front fender, 1 rear-facing camera at the rear, and 1 DMS camera), and 1 millimeter-wave radar (Continental).<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4836c623d8b2cd73bb02956dcd6b24e3\" tg-width=\"733\" tg-height=\"426\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Its core front-facing trilocular camera includes a main camera in the middle and telephoto and wide-angle lenses on both sides, forming a combination of different field of view ranges. All three cameras use the same ON Semiconductor image sensor. The millimeter-wave radar is placed near the vehicle logo at the front of the vehicle and consists of a circuit board and an antenna board. The millimeter-wave radar uses a Freescale control chip and a TI regulated power supply management chip.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5b9d7b28727b0711f5b6eabbf28ff96d\" tg-width=\"749\" tg-height=\"429\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><b>4) Electronic control domain: The Model 3 pioneered the use of 48 SiC MOSFETs instead of 84 IGBTs, significantly reducing its size and power consumption;</b></p><p>According to CITIC Securities, the Model 3 is the first pure electric vehicle to use an all-SiC power module motor controller, pioneering the application of SiC.</p><p>The SiC model used in the Model 3 is STMicroelectronics' ST GK026. At the same power level, this SiC module uses laser welding to connect the SiC MOSFET, input busbar, and output three-phase copper. The package size is significantly smaller than that of a silicon module, and the switching loss is reduced by 75%. Using SiC modules instead of IGBT modules can improve system efficiency by about 5%, and reduce the number of chips and the total area. If the Model X IGBTs are still used, 54-60 IGBTs will be required.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c8cf1eba6f099b4490b34c7dfcaee3c0\" tg-width=\"927\" tg-height=\"383\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>5) Power range: The BMS manages a total of 2,976 21700 batteries, and its powerful software capabilities achieve consistent charging and discharging of each battery.</p><p>As an electric vehicle, the management of electrical energy and batteries is crucial for the Model 3, and the person responsible for managing the battery pack...<b>BMS</b>It is a highly difficult product:</p><p>The main control board is responsible for managing all BMS-related chips and is equipped with 7 sets of external interfaces, including control signals for the charging controller (CP), energy conversion system (PCS), and signals to the sampling board (BMB). In addition, it also includes dedicated current and voltage acquisition signals. The circuit board includes circuit modules such as a high-voltage isolation power supply and a sampling circuit. In terms of components, there are microcontrollers from Freescale and TI, as well as op-amps, reference voltage sources, isolators, data sampling chips, etc.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b587536f0b9997eb043397e683a0abb4\" tg-width=\"908\" tg-height=\"484\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Under the control of the BMS, the BMB circuit board specifically monitors the battery pack. For the Tesla Model 3:</p><p>There are four battery packs in total, each equipped with a BMB circuit board. The circuit layouts of the four circuit boards are different and can be easily distinguished from each other using the numbers on the circuit boards. They are connected together in sequence using a daisy chain, with daisy chains leading out from boards 1 and 4 and connecting to the P5 and P6 interfaces of the main control board.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/95ea719844ddd6929d8848c4bbdd2142\" tg-width=\"907\" tg-height=\"348\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Harnesses and Connectors</p><p>1) Wiring harness: CITIC Securities estimates that the value of wiring harnesses per vehicle is about 2,000 yuan. High-voltage wiring harnesses are the main increment of new energy vehicles. In order to reduce weight, the Model 3 has started to replace copper with aluminum. Low-voltage data cables will be reduced in the process of domain control.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7dbee6fccc6188cc23be8a636c09e9d1\" tg-width=\"913\" tg-height=\"354\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b02522a025888fa0b55934800991bc33\" tg-width=\"755\" tg-height=\"538\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>2) Connectors: Electrification brings an increase in high-voltage connectors, while intelligentization brings demand for high-speed connectors. TE is the core supplier of the Model 3, and domestic manufacturers are expected to achieve breakthroughs.</p><p>On the connector of the power battery-electric drive high-voltage wiring harness,<b>Model3</b>It adopts<b>You</b>of<b>HC Stak 25:</b></p><p>Its structure and function are similar to those of the HC Stak 35, but the difference lies in its size. As you can see, the HC Stak 25 is smaller than the HC Stak 35, so the terminals at the socket end of the HC Stak 25 are made up of 20 DEFCON terminals (the HC Stak 35 has 35). Different models share the same connector terminals. Connector terminals can be quickly assembled into different models by changing the number of stacks, which demonstrates the cost control advantages brought about by modular connector production.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/27ce3149504873c7d267762efc6fba53\" tg-width=\"775\" tg-height=\"301\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Battery: Tesla's intergenerational technology is leading, and the 4680 and CTC are future development directions.</p><p>1) The core concept of battery design is to improve specific energy: from small modules to large modules and then to moduleless CTC, the cell size has increased from 1865 to 2170 and then to 4680. The core trend is to reduce the number of non-energy structural components in the battery pack, reduce costs, reduce weight, and improve driving range.</p><p>According to CITIC Securities, the Model 3 battery pack uses four large modules. Compared with the battery packs of the iD.4 X and BMW iX3 at the same time, it adopts large module technology, resulting in higher integration and a cleaner internal layout. Battery pack technology is still in a leading position.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b23dabb7e95eaba19611c9fbd3810f29\" tg-width=\"771\" tg-height=\"216\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>2) Value and changes of 4680 batteries: The 4680 achieves the impossible triangle of \"high energy density, high rate, and low cost\" through the combination of full tab, high nickel and high silicon, dry electrode, and CTC. As the number of batteries in the module increases and the demand for fast charging rises, the requirements for cooling, thermal conductivity and flame retardancy of the battery pack are increasing. The number of cooling pipes in the battery pack is increasing, the length of the cold pipes is decreasing, and sealing and fireproof foam are added to ensure the thermal stability of the battery pack.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/df353f7deb14b1e3481ccc22db2f2a7a\" tg-width=\"783\" tg-height=\"378\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>The integration of the three electric motors and thermal management has been continuously improved, and thermal management has taken the lead in achieving full-domain integration.</p><p>1) The three-in-one integration enhances integration, with dual motors achieving complementary advantages: The Model 3/Y combines the drive motor, motor controller, and transmission into one, which is more integrated than the Model S/X. At the same time, the \"small three electric motors\" and battery pack are integrated, resulting in a compact structure and lower cost. The single-motor version evolved from an induction motor to a permanent magnet motor, while the dual-motor version evolved from a forward induction motor to a later permanent magnet motor arrangement. The two motors complement each other's advantages in the high-speed and low-speed regions.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fb1406d1dc031a4d940e03c4f6f676f2\" tg-width=\"631\" tg-height=\"356\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>2) Comprehensive integration of thermal management greatly improves energy utilization efficiency: In terms of thermal management, through the application of four-way valves and eight-way valves, the entire vehicle thermal management has been upgraded from independent circuits for each part to one that integrates the air conditioning, battery system, and power system, integrating the entire vehicle heat source to improve the system's energy utilization efficiency. Tesla's three-electric and thermal management systems maintain a leading position in terms of high integration, and their exemplary role will lead the industry to catch up, upgrade, and innovate secondarily.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b079e0e13760c45d4172f14f7baa31dd\" tg-width=\"813\" tg-height=\"333\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Automotive Body: Lightweight Demand: Integrated Aluminum Body Die Casting Becomes a Trend; Consumption Upgrades Make Sunroofs and Smart Headlights Become Fashionable</p><p>1) Body: Lightweight to meet energy conservation and improve range requirements, aluminum instead of steel is the best choice, and integrated die casting of the rear body will be carried out starting from the Model Y;<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/824c486f4801101f96cc3ed4c8a775ca\" tg-width=\"801\" tg-height=\"308\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>2) Headlights: The Model 3's exterior design combines technology and aesthetics, and the headlights use matrix LED light sources;</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2b296677f6ceb659eef22a35c43daf3a\" tg-width=\"799\" tg-height=\"277\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>3) Automotive glass: The Model 3 sunroof is leading industry trends, and its penetration rate is expected to continue to increase;</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a9e952c54e259cb11d491a29a696a968\" tg-width=\"813\" tg-height=\"320\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>4) Chassis: Adopting a control-by-wire chassis is essential for high-level autonomous driving.</p><p>According to CITIC Securities,<b>Model 3</b>The chassis is gradually becoming control-by-wire:</p><p>After disassembling the Model 3 chassis structure, we can see that in terms of suspension, all Tesla models use a front double wishbone independent suspension paired with a rear multi-link independent suspension, but are not equipped with air suspension. In terms of braking systems, Tesla vehicles use the most cutting-edge technology, namely the Ibooster in-line drive system; In terms of steering system, the Model 3 still uses traditional electric power steering. A control-by-wire chassis enables autonomous driving.<b>SAEL3</b>The cornerstone of \"execution\". An autonomous driving system consists of four parts: perception, decision-making, control, and execution. The chassis system is the \"execution\" mechanism in autonomous driving and is the core functional module that ultimately realizes autonomous driving. The realization of L3 and higher levels of autonomous driving cannot be achieved without the rapid response and precise execution of the chassis actuator, in order to achieve a high degree of synergy with the perception, decision-making and control of the upper layer. The upgrade of the chassis system also means the upgrade of functional modules such as the drive system, braking system, and steering system. Therefore, control-by-wire chassis, as the cornerstone of higher-level autonomous driving, are a concrete tool for developing autonomous driving.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a28e1239e7886002c8d3f9a3f999c049\" tg-width=\"799\" tg-height=\"304\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></body></html></p>","source":"highlight_wallstreetcn","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>It's so curly! The top brokerage firm dismantled Tesla and wrote a 94-page report.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIt's so curly! The top brokerage firm dismantled Tesla and wrote a 94-page report.\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">华尔街见闻</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2022-07-18 10:33</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><html><head></head><body>If you've never disassembled a car, you'd be embarrassed to call yourself a tram analyst. Sell-side analysts are \"scrolling endlessly\"...</p><p>Following Haitong International's disassembly of a BYD \"Yuan\" last month and its 87-page research report showcasing detailed details of auto parts, CITIC Securities, the \"top brokerage firm,\" disassembled a Tesla Model 3 and wrote a 94-page research report.</p><p>Over two months, CITIC Securities' research department's TMT and automotive teams, in collaboration with multiple companies and institutions, completed a complete disassembly of the standard range version of the Model 3.</p><p>CITIC Securities stated:</p><p>The aim is to analyze the Tesla Model 3, a benchmark model for intelligent electric vehicles, to showcase Tesla's thinking on the intelligent electrification of automobiles as a leading global automaker, in order to clarify the possible direction of future industrial development and better support relevant decisions. Through disassembly, CITIC Securities conducted a detailed and in-depth analysis of Tesla's E/E architecture, three batteries, thermal management, and vehicle body.</p><p>domain controller architecture</p><p>According to CITIC Securities, the E/E architecture has shifted from a distributed to a domain control architecture, and the decoupling of software and hardware is key to software-defined cars. Tesla's Model 3 is a leader in domain control architecture.</p><p><b>1) Body domain: The front, left and right three bodies use positional zoning rather than functional zoning to reduce wiring difficulty, and HSD is widely used to replace relays;</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bcaee1d0a80c502e4b0095b3c6d47cdb\" tg-width=\"907\" tg-height=\"329\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>The front body domain controllers are located in the front cabin, which theoretically has a higher probability of collision. Therefore, they use aluminum alloy protective housings. The left and right body domain controllers, being located inside the passenger compartment, have a lower probability of encountering external collisions, and both protective housings are made of plastic.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9e2e3ec0d88244cf0ba05df76dbf12e5\" tg-width=\"706\" tg-height=\"439\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>2) Cockpit Domain: Integrates the T-BOX into the cockpit domain controller and uses Intel's A3950 chip, which is closer to a gaming platform than a mobile phone;</b></p><p>The cockpit domain is an important part of the user experience, and Tesla's cockpit control platform is constantly evolving. The 2020 Tesla Model 3 that CITIC Securities disassembled this time uses the second-generation cockpit domain controller (MCU2):</p><p>The MCU2 consists of two circuit boards, one is the motherboard, and the other is a small wireless communication circuit board fixed to the motherboard (shown in the pink box in the figure). This communication circuit board includes an LTE module, an Ethernet control chip, an antenna interface, etc., which is equivalent to the T-box used for external wireless communication in traditional cars. Integrating it into the MCU can save space and costs. The 2020 Model 3 we're disassembling this time uses Telit's LTE module. After the 2021 model, Tesla switched its wireless module supplier to Quectel. The MCU2 motherboard uses a double-sided PCB, with the front side mainly containing various network-related chips, such as Ethernet chips from Intel and Marvell, LTE modules from Telit, and video serializers from TI. Another important function of the front is to provide external interfaces, such as Bluetooth/WiFi/LTE antenna interfaces, camera input/output interfaces, audio interfaces, USB interfaces, Ethernet interfaces, etc.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e974436a2dc5b19a849251a7c210317d\" tg-width=\"937\" tg-height=\"544\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>The back of the MCU2 is more important, with an Intel Atoma 3950 chip at its core, paired with a total of 4GB of Micron memory and a 64GB eMMC memory chip also provided by Micron. In addition, there are WiFi/Bluetooth modules provided by LGInnotek.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6f06009817e03dc2d31a3f14a908f486\" tg-width=\"906\" tg-height=\"499\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><b>3) Driving range: Dual FSD chips, NPU offers better cost performance than Orin in the same area, and the Linux operating system is more suitable for large AI models;</b></p><p>Another important feature of Tesla is its Intelligent Driving, which is performed through its Autopilot Domain Controller (AP). The core of this section lies in Tesla's self-developed FSD chip; the rest of the configuration is not essentially different from other current autonomous driving controller solutions:</p><p>The HW3.0 version of the AP used in the Model 3 is equipped with two FSD chips, each configured with four Samsung 2GB memory chips, for a total of 8GB per FSD. Each FSD is also equipped with a 32GB Toshiba flash memory chip and a 64MB Spansion NorFlash chip for booting. In terms of networking, the AP controller includes Marvell Ethernet switches and physical layer transceivers, as well as TI's high-speed CAN transceivers. Positioning is also very important for autonomous driving, which is why it is equipped with a Ublox GPS positioning module.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9938c812944cab9e51cd6ed7319bc668\" tg-width=\"905\" tg-height=\"457\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/760b93bcd8e51158df569a11580ab6dc\" tg-width=\"756\" tg-height=\"426\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>To achieve autonomous driving, Tesla has proposed a complete solution based on vision and centered on FSD chips:</p><p>Its peripheral sensors mainly include 12 ultrasonic sensors (Valeo), 8 cameras (3 front-facing cameras on the windshield roof, 2 front-facing cameras on the B-pillar, 2 rear-facing cameras on the front fender, 1 rear-facing camera at the rear, and 1 DMS camera), and 1 millimeter-wave radar (Continental).<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4836c623d8b2cd73bb02956dcd6b24e3\" tg-width=\"733\" tg-height=\"426\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Its core front-facing trilocular camera includes a main camera in the middle and telephoto and wide-angle lenses on both sides, forming a combination of different field of view ranges. All three cameras use the same ON Semiconductor image sensor. The millimeter-wave radar is placed near the vehicle logo at the front of the vehicle and consists of a circuit board and an antenna board. The millimeter-wave radar uses a Freescale control chip and a TI regulated power supply management chip.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5b9d7b28727b0711f5b6eabbf28ff96d\" tg-width=\"749\" tg-height=\"429\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><b>4) Electronic control domain: The Model 3 pioneered the use of 48 SiC MOSFETs instead of 84 IGBTs, significantly reducing its size and power consumption;</b></p><p>According to CITIC Securities, the Model 3 is the first pure electric vehicle to use an all-SiC power module motor controller, pioneering the application of SiC.</p><p>The SiC model used in the Model 3 is STMicroelectronics' ST GK026. At the same power level, this SiC module uses laser welding to connect the SiC MOSFET, input busbar, and output three-phase copper. The package size is significantly smaller than that of a silicon module, and the switching loss is reduced by 75%. Using SiC modules instead of IGBT modules can improve system efficiency by about 5%, and reduce the number of chips and the total area. If the Model X IGBTs are still used, 54-60 IGBTs will be required.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c8cf1eba6f099b4490b34c7dfcaee3c0\" tg-width=\"927\" tg-height=\"383\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>5) Power range: The BMS manages a total of 2,976 21700 batteries, and its powerful software capabilities achieve consistent charging and discharging of each battery.</p><p>As an electric vehicle, the management of electrical energy and batteries is crucial for the Model 3, and the person responsible for managing the battery pack...<b>BMS</b>It is a highly difficult product:</p><p>The main control board is responsible for managing all BMS-related chips and is equipped with 7 sets of external interfaces, including control signals for the charging controller (CP), energy conversion system (PCS), and signals to the sampling board (BMB). In addition, it also includes dedicated current and voltage acquisition signals. The circuit board includes circuit modules such as a high-voltage isolation power supply and a sampling circuit. In terms of components, there are microcontrollers from Freescale and TI, as well as op-amps, reference voltage sources, isolators, data sampling chips, etc.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b587536f0b9997eb043397e683a0abb4\" tg-width=\"908\" tg-height=\"484\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Under the control of the BMS, the BMB circuit board specifically monitors the battery pack. For the Tesla Model 3:</p><p>There are four battery packs in total, each equipped with a BMB circuit board. The circuit layouts of the four circuit boards are different and can be easily distinguished from each other using the numbers on the circuit boards. They are connected together in sequence using a daisy chain, with daisy chains leading out from boards 1 and 4 and connecting to the P5 and P6 interfaces of the main control board.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/95ea719844ddd6929d8848c4bbdd2142\" tg-width=\"907\" tg-height=\"348\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Harnesses and Connectors</p><p>1) Wiring harness: CITIC Securities estimates that the value of wiring harnesses per vehicle is about 2,000 yuan. High-voltage wiring harnesses are the main increment of new energy vehicles. In order to reduce weight, the Model 3 has started to replace copper with aluminum. Low-voltage data cables will be reduced in the process of domain control.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7dbee6fccc6188cc23be8a636c09e9d1\" tg-width=\"913\" tg-height=\"354\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b02522a025888fa0b55934800991bc33\" tg-width=\"755\" tg-height=\"538\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>2) Connectors: Electrification brings an increase in high-voltage connectors, while intelligentization brings demand for high-speed connectors. TE is the core supplier of the Model 3, and domestic manufacturers are expected to achieve breakthroughs.</p><p>On the connector of the power battery-electric drive high-voltage wiring harness,<b>Model3</b>It adopts<b>You</b>of<b>HC Stak 25:</b></p><p>Its structure and function are similar to those of the HC Stak 35, but the difference lies in its size. As you can see, the HC Stak 25 is smaller than the HC Stak 35, so the terminals at the socket end of the HC Stak 25 are made up of 20 DEFCON terminals (the HC Stak 35 has 35). Different models share the same connector terminals. Connector terminals can be quickly assembled into different models by changing the number of stacks, which demonstrates the cost control advantages brought about by modular connector production.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/27ce3149504873c7d267762efc6fba53\" tg-width=\"775\" tg-height=\"301\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Battery: Tesla's intergenerational technology is leading, and the 4680 and CTC are future development directions.</p><p>1) The core concept of battery design is to improve specific energy: from small modules to large modules and then to moduleless CTC, the cell size has increased from 1865 to 2170 and then to 4680. The core trend is to reduce the number of non-energy structural components in the battery pack, reduce costs, reduce weight, and improve driving range.</p><p>According to CITIC Securities, the Model 3 battery pack uses four large modules. Compared with the battery packs of the iD.4 X and BMW iX3 at the same time, it adopts large module technology, resulting in higher integration and a cleaner internal layout. Battery pack technology is still in a leading position.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b23dabb7e95eaba19611c9fbd3810f29\" tg-width=\"771\" tg-height=\"216\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>2) Value and changes of 4680 batteries: The 4680 achieves the impossible triangle of \"high energy density, high rate, and low cost\" through the combination of full tab, high nickel and high silicon, dry electrode, and CTC. As the number of batteries in the module increases and the demand for fast charging rises, the requirements for cooling, thermal conductivity and flame retardancy of the battery pack are increasing. The number of cooling pipes in the battery pack is increasing, the length of the cold pipes is decreasing, and sealing and fireproof foam are added to ensure the thermal stability of the battery pack.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/df353f7deb14b1e3481ccc22db2f2a7a\" tg-width=\"783\" tg-height=\"378\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>The integration of the three electric motors and thermal management has been continuously improved, and thermal management has taken the lead in achieving full-domain integration.</p><p>1) The three-in-one integration enhances integration, with dual motors achieving complementary advantages: The Model 3/Y combines the drive motor, motor controller, and transmission into one, which is more integrated than the Model S/X. At the same time, the \"small three electric motors\" and battery pack are integrated, resulting in a compact structure and lower cost. The single-motor version evolved from an induction motor to a permanent magnet motor, while the dual-motor version evolved from a forward induction motor to a later permanent magnet motor arrangement. The two motors complement each other's advantages in the high-speed and low-speed regions.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fb1406d1dc031a4d940e03c4f6f676f2\" tg-width=\"631\" tg-height=\"356\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>2) Comprehensive integration of thermal management greatly improves energy utilization efficiency: In terms of thermal management, through the application of four-way valves and eight-way valves, the entire vehicle thermal management has been upgraded from independent circuits for each part to one that integrates the air conditioning, battery system, and power system, integrating the entire vehicle heat source to improve the system's energy utilization efficiency. Tesla's three-electric and thermal management systems maintain a leading position in terms of high integration, and their exemplary role will lead the industry to catch up, upgrade, and innovate secondarily.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b079e0e13760c45d4172f14f7baa31dd\" tg-width=\"813\" tg-height=\"333\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Automotive Body: Lightweight Demand: Integrated Aluminum Body Die Casting Becomes a Trend; Consumption Upgrades Make Sunroofs and Smart Headlights Become Fashionable</p><p>1) Body: Lightweight to meet energy conservation and improve range requirements, aluminum instead of steel is the best choice, and integrated die casting of the rear body will be carried out starting from the Model Y;<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/824c486f4801101f96cc3ed4c8a775ca\" tg-width=\"801\" tg-height=\"308\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>2) Headlights: The Model 3's exterior design combines technology and aesthetics, and the headlights use matrix LED light sources;</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2b296677f6ceb659eef22a35c43daf3a\" tg-width=\"799\" tg-height=\"277\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>3) Automotive glass: The Model 3 sunroof is leading industry trends, and its penetration rate is expected to continue to increase;</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a9e952c54e259cb11d491a29a696a968\" tg-width=\"813\" tg-height=\"320\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>4) Chassis: Adopting a control-by-wire chassis is essential for high-level autonomous driving.</p><p>According to CITIC Securities,<b>Model 3</b>The chassis is gradually becoming control-by-wire:</p><p>After disassembling the Model 3 chassis structure, we can see that in terms of suspension, all Tesla models use a front double wishbone independent suspension paired with a rear multi-link independent suspension, but are not equipped with air suspension. In terms of braking systems, Tesla vehicles use the most cutting-edge technology, namely the Ibooster in-line drive system; In terms of steering system, the Model 3 still uses traditional electric power steering. A control-by-wire chassis enables autonomous driving.<b>SAEL3</b>The cornerstone of \"execution\". An autonomous driving system consists of four parts: perception, decision-making, control, and execution. The chassis system is the \"execution\" mechanism in autonomous driving and is the core functional module that ultimately realizes autonomous driving. The realization of L3 and higher levels of autonomous driving cannot be achieved without the rapid response and precise execution of the chassis actuator, in order to achieve a high degree of synergy with the perception, decision-making and control of the upper layer. The upgrade of the chassis system also means the upgrade of functional modules such as the drive system, braking system, and steering system. Therefore, control-by-wire chassis, as the cornerstone of higher-level autonomous driving, are a concrete tool for developing autonomous driving.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a28e1239e7886002c8d3f9a3f999c049\" tg-width=\"799\" tg-height=\"304\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></body></html></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3665028\">华尔街见闻</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bcaee1d0a80c502e4b0095b3c6d47cdb","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3665028","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/cc96873d3d23ee6ac10685520df9c100","article_id":"1148974307","content_text":"没拆过车，都不好意思说自己是电车分析师。卖方分析师“卷无止尽”......继上个月海通国际拆了一台比亚迪“元”，用87页研报展示汽车零部件的详细细节后，“券商一哥”中信证券拆了一台特斯拉Model 3，并写了一份94页的研报。耗时两个月，中信证券研究部TMT和汽车团队协同多家公司和机构对Model3标准续航版进行了完整的拆解。中信证券称：希望通过对特斯拉Model3这一智能电动的标杆车型的分析，展现特斯拉作为一家全球头部汽车企业对汽车智能电动化的思考，以期厘清后续产业发展的可能方向，更好地支持相关决策。通过拆解，中信证券对特斯拉的E/E架构、三电、热管理、车身等进行了详细深入地分析。域控制器架构据中信证券，E/E架构由分布式转向域控制结构，软硬件实现解耦，是软件定义汽车的关键，特斯拉的Model3是域控架构的引领者。1）车身域：前左右三个车身采用位置分区而非功能分区，意在降低布线难度，大量采用HSD替代继电器；前车身域控制器的位置在前舱，这个位置理论上来说遇到的碰撞概率要更高，因此采用铝合金的保护外壳，而左右车身域控制器由于在乘用舱内，遇到外界碰撞的概率较低，保护外壳均采用塑料结构：2）座舱域：将T-BOX集成到座舱域控制器，同时采用了Intel的A3950芯片，思路更接近游戏平台而非手机；座舱域是用户体验的重要组成部分，特斯拉的座舱控制平台也在不断进化中。中信证券本次拆解的特斯拉model3 2020款采用的是第二代座舱域控制器（MCU2）：MCU2由两块电路板构成，一块是主板，另一块是固定在主板上的一块小型无线通信电路板（图中粉色框所示）。这一块通信电路板包含了LTE模组、以太网控制芯片、天线接口等，相当于传统汽车中用于对外无线通信的T-box，此次将其集成在MCU中，能够节约空间和成本。我们本次拆解的2020款model3采用了Telit的LTE模组，在2021款以后特斯拉将无线模组供应商切换成移远通信。MCU2的主板采用了双面PCB板，正面主要布局各种网络相关芯片，例如Intel和Marvell的以太网芯片，Telit的LTE模组，TI的视频串行器等。正面的另一个重要作用是提供对外接口，如蓝牙/WiFi/LTE的天线接口、摄像头输入输出接口、音频接口、USB接口、以太网接口等。而MCU2的背面更为重要，其核心是一颗IntelAtomA3950芯片，搭配总计4GB的Micron内存和同样是Micron提供的64GBeMMC存储芯片。此外还有LGInnotek提供的WiFi/蓝牙模块等。3）驾驶域：双FSD芯片，NPU在同等面积下相比Orin有更高的性价比，采用Linux操作系统更适配AI大模型；特斯拉的另一个重要特色就是其智能驾驶，这部分功能是通过其自动驾驶域控制器（AP）来执行的。本部分的核心在于特斯拉自主开发的FSD芯片，其余配置则与当前其他自动驾驶控制器方案没有本质区别：在model3所用的HW3.0版本的AP中，配备两颗FSD芯片，每颗配置4个三星2GB内存颗粒，单FSD总计8GB，同时每颗FSD配备一片东芝的32GB闪存以及一颗Spansion的64MBNORflash用于启动。网络方面，AP控制器内部包含Marvell的以太网交换机和物理层收发器，此外还有TI的高速CAN收发器。对于自动驾驶来说，定位也十分重要，因此配备了一个Ublox的GPS定位模块。为了实现自动驾驶，特斯拉提出了一整套以视觉为基础，以FSD芯片为核心的解决方案：其外围传感器主要包含12个超声传感器（Valeo）、8个摄像头（风挡玻璃顶3个前视，B柱2个拍摄侧前方，前翼子板2个后视，车尾1个后视摄像头，以及1个DMS摄像头）、1个毫米波雷达（大陆）。其最核心的前视三目摄像头包含中间的主摄像头以及两侧的长焦镜头和广角镜头，形成不同视野范围的搭配，三个摄像头用的是相同的安森美图像传感器。毫米波雷达放置于车头处车标附近，包含一块电路板和一块天线板。该毫米波雷达内部采用的是一颗Freescale控制芯片以及一颗TI的稳压电源管理芯片。4）电控域：Model3首创采用48颗SiC MOSFET替代了84颗IGBT，体积、功耗大幅减小；据中信证券，Model3为第一款采用全SiC功率模块电机控制器的纯电动汽车，开创SiC应用的先河：Model3所用的SiC型号为意法半导体的ST GK026。在相同功率等级下，这款SiC模块采用激光焊接将SiC MOSFET、输入母排和输出三相铜进行连接，封装尺寸也明显小于硅模块，并且开关损耗降低75%。采用SiC模块替代IGBT模块，其系统效率可以提高5%左右，芯片数量及总面积也均有所减少。如果仍采用Model X的IGBT，则需要54-60颗IGBT。5）动力域：BMS共管理2976节21700电池，强大的软件能力实现每节电池充放电的一致性。Model3作为电动车，电能和电池的管理十分重要，而负责管理电池组的BMS是一个高难度产品:主控板负责管理所有BMS相关芯片，共设置7组对外接口，包含了对充电控制器（CP）、能量转换系统（PCS）的控制信号，以及到采样板（BMB）的信号，另外还包含专门的电流电压采集信号。电路板上包含高压隔离电源、采样电路等电路模块。元器件方面，有Freescale和TI的单片机，以及运放、参考电压源、隔离器、数据采样芯片等。在BMS的控制下，具体对电池组进行监测的是BMB电路板，对于特斯拉model3而言:共有4个电池组，每一组配备一个BMB电路板，并且4个电路板的电路布局各不相同，彼此之间可以很容易地利用电路板上的编号进行区别，并且按照顺序用菊花链连接在一起，在1号板和4号板引出菊花链连接到主控板的P5和P6接口。线束和连接器1）线束：中信证券测算线束单车价值量约2000元，高压线束是新能源汽车的主要增量，Model3为了轻量化开始用铝替代铜，低压数据线在域控化进程下将有所减少；2）连接器：电动化带来高压连接器增量，智能化带来高速连接器需求，TE（泰科）是Model3的核心供应商，国产厂商有望取得突破。在动力电池—电驱高压线束的连接器上，Model3采用的是TE的HC Stak 25：其结构和功能与HC Stak 35类似，不同点在于尺寸的大小，可以看到，HC Stak 25比HC Stak 35更小，因此HC Stak 25插座端的端子是20片DEFCON端子组成（HC Stak 35为35片），不同的型号共用相同的连接器端子。连接器端子通过数量堆叠的变化能够快速完成不同型号的组装，这体现了连接器模块化生产带来的成本管控优势。电池：特斯拉代际技术领先，4680和CTC是后续发展方向1）电池设计核心理念在于提升比能量：由小模组到大模组再到无模组CTC，电芯尺寸由1865到2170再到4680，核心趋势都是减少电池包中非能量的结构件数量，降低成本减少重量，提升续航里程。据中信证券，Model3电池包采用4块大模组，与同期的iD.4 X，宝马iX3的电池包相比，采用大模组技术，集成度更高，内部布局更为整洁，电池包技术目前仍处于领先地位。2）4680电池的价值及变化：4680通过全极耳、高镍高硅、干电极、CTC的组合，实现了“能量密度高、倍率高、成本低”的不可能三角。随着模组内电池数量增加、快充需求提升，对于电池包的冷却、导热阻燃要求提升，电池包内冷却管数量增加、冷管长度减少，增加灌封、防火泡棉，保障电池包热稳定性。三电与热管理：三电集成度不断提高，热管理率先实现全域打通。1）三合一提升集成度，双电机实现优势互补：Model 3/Y上驱动电机、电机控制器、变速箱三者合一，集成度相比Model S/X提高，同时“小三电”和电池包集成，结构紧凑成本更低；单电机版本由感应电机向永磁电机演变，双电机版本向前感应电机后永磁电机布置演进，两种电机在高速低速区优势互补。2）热管理全域打通，大大提升能量利用效率：热管理上，通过四通阀、八通阀的应用，由各部分独立的回路，向空调、电池系统、动力系统打通的整车热管理升级，整车热源集成，提升系统的能量利用效率。特斯拉的三电与热管理系统在高集成度方面保持领先，其示范作用将引领行业追赶升级与二次创新。汽车车身：轻量化需求铝车身一体压铸成趋势，消费升级天幕玻璃、智能车灯变潮流1）车身：轻量化以满足节能及提高续航要求，以铝代钢是最佳选择，并从Model Y开始进行后车身的一体压铸；2）车灯：Model3外饰搭配兼具科技感和美感，车灯选用矩阵式LED灯源；3）汽车玻璃：Model3天幕引领行业趋势，渗透率有望不断提升；4）底盘：采用线控底盘，是高级别自动驾驶必由之路。据中信证券，Model 3底盘逐步实现线控化：经过对Model 3底盘结构的拆解，我们看到：悬架方面，特斯拉全车型均采用前轮双叉臂式独立悬架搭配后轮多连杆式独立悬架的配置，未配置空气悬架；制动系统方面，特斯拉车系使用最前沿技术，即线控制动系统Ibooster；转向系统方面，Model3仍沿用传统的电动助力转向。线控底盘是实现自动驾驶SAEL3的“执行”基石。自动驾驶系统共分为感知、决策、控制和执行四个部分，其中底盘系统属于自动驾驶中的“执行”机构，是最终实现自动驾驶的核心功能模块。L3及L3以上更高级别自动驾驶的实现离不开底盘执行机构的快速响应和精确执行，以达到和上层的感知、决策和控制的高度协同。而底盘系统的升级也意味着其中驱动系统、制动系统和转向系统等功能模块的升级。所以，线控底盘作为更高级别自动驾驶的执行基石，是发展自动驾驶的具体抓手。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":5193,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9072469491,"gmtCreate":1658097092113,"gmtModify":1676536102512,"author":{"id":"3576195246415673","authorId":"3576195246415673","name":"Jefflau749","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3b16bea38b728770eeacee83d0ca1b56","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576195246415673","authorIdStr":"3576195246415673"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"ya","listText":"ya","text":"ya","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9072469491","repostId":"1137152216","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1451,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9070965783,"gmtCreate":1656996523942,"gmtModify":1676535929838,"author":{"id":"3576195246415673","authorId":"3576195246415673","name":"Jefflau749","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3b16bea38b728770eeacee83d0ca1b56","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576195246415673","authorIdStr":"3576195246415673"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"ya","listText":"ya","text":"ya","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9070965783","repostId":"1154332977","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1611,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9026007301,"gmtCreate":1653289996103,"gmtModify":1676535254607,"author":{"id":"3576195246415673","authorId":"3576195246415673","name":"Jefflau749","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3b16bea38b728770eeacee83d0ca1b56","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576195246415673","authorIdStr":"3576195246415673"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"ya","listText":"ya","text":"ya","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9026007301","repostId":"1109790779","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1927,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":894738668,"gmtCreate":1628855447654,"gmtModify":1676529875686,"author":{"id":"3576195246415673","authorId":"3576195246415673","name":"Jefflau749","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3b16bea38b728770eeacee83d0ca1b56","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576195246415673","authorIdStr":"3576195246415673"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AABB\">$Asia Broadband, Inc.(AABB)$</a>good","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AABB\">$Asia Broadband, Inc.(AABB)$</a>good","text":"$Asia Broadband, Inc.(AABB)$good","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/60ebbb9cb8c8c359560505d4db9c38bc","width":"1200","height":"2133"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":15,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/894738668","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2401,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":172707455,"gmtCreate":1626991903677,"gmtModify":1703481844263,"author":{"id":"3576195246415673","authorId":"3576195246415673","name":"Jefflau749","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3b16bea38b728770eeacee83d0ca1b56","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576195246415673","authorIdStr":"3576195246415673"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"ya XD","listText":"ya XD","text":"ya XD","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":12,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/172707455","repostId":"2153674116","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2153674116","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626964221,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2153674116?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-22 22:30","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Tesla has partnered with a giant to address its \"biggest concern\" regarding battery production expansion.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2153674116","media":"上海证券报","summary":"特斯拉又“牵手”了一大巨头。\n澳大利亚矿业巨头必和必拓7月22日宣布，与特斯拉签署镍供应协议，必和必拓旗下的西部镍业（Nickel West）将为特斯拉提供作为电池制造原料的镍。\n对于具体的合作内容，","content":"<p><div>Tesla has once again partnered with a major giant. Australian mining giant BHP Billiton announced on July 22 that it has signed a Nickel supply agreement with Tesla, under which BHP Billiton's Nickel West will provide Tesla with Nickel as a raw material for battery manufacturing. BHP Billiton has not disclosed the specific details of the cooperation. Nickel is one of the important raw materials for the production of power batteries, mainly used in ternary material batteries. Data from the China Automotive Power Battery Industry Innovation Alliance shows that in the first half of 2021, China's ternary lithium battery production reached 36.9 GWh, accounting for 49.3% of the total output, representing a year-on-year cumulative increase...</p><p><a href=\"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN202107222219457c23f505&s=b\">Web page link</a></div></p>","source":"shzqb","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla has partnered with a giant to address its \"biggest concern\" regarding battery production expansion.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla has partnered with a giant to address its \"biggest concern\" regarding battery production expansion.\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">上海证券报</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-22 22:30</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><div>Tesla has once again partnered with a major giant. Australian mining giant BHP Billiton announced on July 22 that it has signed a Nickel supply agreement with Tesla, under which BHP Billiton's Nickel West will provide Tesla with Nickel as a raw material for battery manufacturing. BHP Billiton has not disclosed the specific details of the cooperation. Nickel is one of the important raw materials for the production of power batteries, mainly used in ternary material batteries. Data from the China Automotive Power Battery Industry Innovation Alliance shows that in the first half of 2021, China's ternary lithium battery production reached 36.9 GWh, accounting for 49.3% of the total output, representing a year-on-year cumulative increase...</p><p><a href=\"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN202107222219457c23f505&s=b\">Web page link</a></div></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN202107222219457c23f505&s=b\">上海证券报</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8350896f4f33c86bc28f200b67ab82b4","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN202107222219457c23f505&s=b","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2153674116","content_text":"特斯拉又“牵手”了一大巨头。\n澳大利亚矿业巨头必和必拓7月22日宣布，与特斯拉签署镍供应协议，必和必拓旗下的西部镍业（Nickel West）将为特斯拉提供作为电池制造原料的镍。\n对于具体的合作内容，必和必拓没有公开。\n镍是生产动力电池的重要原材料之一，主要应用于三元材料电池。中国汽车动力电池产业创新联盟数据显示，2021年上半年，国内三元材料电池产量为36.9GWh，占总产量49.3%，同比累计增长149.2%。\n随着三元材料电池产量快速增长，电池用镍需求日益旺盛。据上海有色网数据，上半年国内三元前驱体对镍需求量达到9.67万吨，同比增长153%。\n必和必拓首席商务官潘文怡（Vandita Pant）表示，据估计，电池制造对镍的需求在未来十年将增长五倍以上，主要用于支持世界日益增长的电动汽车市场需求。\n镍对特斯拉有多重要？特斯拉CEO马斯克此前曾多次表达对未来镍供应的担忧，他曾表态需要矿商生产更多的镍。\n当地时间今年2月25日，特斯拉CEO马斯克曾在社交媒体上表示，镍是特斯拉扩大锂电池产量的最大顾虑，并暗示“缺镍”导致特斯拉大规模运用磷酸铁锂电池路线。\n去年，马斯克还在二季度财报电话会议上对采矿业喊话：如果你们以环保的方式高效开采镍，特斯拉将给你们一份长期大合同。\n正如马斯克所暗示，由于对镍供给存在顾虑，特斯拉转而大规模运用磷酸铁锂电池。但至今磷酸铁锂能量密度低、里程短的问题仍没有有效解决。随着消费者对新能源汽车的高续航里程、轻量化的需求逐步提升，三元材料电池路线仍是无可替代的，这使镍资源保障问题日益受到这个行业的重视。\n而镍在电池中的主要作用在于提高能量密度，即电池所含的镍比例越高，电池所含电量也越高，反映到新能源汽车上就是续航能力越高。\n\n而从国际电池头部企业的动作来看，高镍三元电池路线将成为一大主流。\n2021年，宝马IX系列、大众ID系列、奔驰EQ系列等搭载高镍电池的新车型纷纷上市。在降成本和提升产品竞争力要求下，高镍三元路线日益获得业内认可，电池企业纷纷研发镍含量更高的下一代电池。\n中信期货认为，2025年全球新能源汽车市场三元材料电池占比将达到74%。根据未来三元材料高镍化的比例来估算，预计电池用镍需求量将达到27万吨，是2020年需求的将近4 倍。\n华泰期货认为，随着全球新能源汽车产量快速增长、三元电池高镍化进程推进，全球三元电池耗镍量持续攀升。2021年开始全球三元电池耗镍增量逐渐显著，对镍价逐步形成推动力量，成为镍消费格局改变的转折点。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2269,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":152191144,"gmtCreate":1625274221188,"gmtModify":1703739708929,"author":{"id":"3576195246415673","authorId":"3576195246415673","name":"Jefflau749","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3b16bea38b728770eeacee83d0ca1b56","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576195246415673","authorIdStr":"3576195246415673"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"yo","listText":"yo","text":"yo","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/152191144","repostId":"2148801442","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2148801442","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1625272059,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2148801442?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-03 08:27","market":"fut","language":"zh","title":"The Federal Reserve revealed that Powell had a \"private chat\" with the Coinbase CEO in May.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2148801442","media":"华尔街见闻","summary":"今年5月比特币等加密货币的大跌可能吸引了美联储领导者的注意。\n美联储本周五公布的纪录显示，联储主席鲍威尔曾在5月11日和美国最大加密货币交易所Coinbase的CEO Brian Armstrong会","content":"<p>The sharp drop in cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin in May of this year may have caught the attention of Federal Reserve leaders.</p><p>Records released by the Federal Reserve this Friday show that Fed Chairman Jerome Powell met with Brian Armstrong, CEO of Coinbase, the largest cryptocurrency exchange in the United States, on May 11, and the meeting lasted 30 minutes. A day later, on the 12th, Powell met again with Christopher Giancarlo, chairman of the CFTC, a former regulator who actively promotes the central bank's digital currency, the digital dollar, for 30 minutes.</p><p>Although the Federal Reserve did not disclose the specifics of Powell's meetings with Armstrong and Giancarlo, and spokespeople for both the Fed and Coinbase declined to comment on the May meetings, Wall Street Insights noted that in the Fed's records, Powell only met with the CEOs of two companies in May: Armstrong and a Wall Street giant.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JPM\">JPMorgan Chase</a>CEO Dimon. Also in May, media reported last year that Federal Reserve Governor Brainard, who was expected to succeed Powell as Federal Reserve Chairman after the Biden administration took office, endorsed central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) in a public speech.</p><p>Brainard stated that month that central bank-backed cryptocurrencies could offer a variety of benefits, reducing counterparty risks, as well as risks to consumer protection and financial stability, while privately issued cryptocurrencies pose multiple risks such as money laundering, threatening consumer protection or creating widespread financial stability risks.</p><p>Coincidentally, in May, when Powell had a \"private chat\" with Armstrong, several cryptocurrencies experienced double-digit drops.</p><p>The Wall Street Insights article mentioned that on May 13, the day after the Powell talks, [the following text appears to be unrelated and possibly machine-generated].<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla</a>The suspension of car payments in Bitcoin and the investigation into Binance, the world's largest cryptocurrency exchange, by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and the Department of Justice have hit several major cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin, with some falling by more than 10%, and some by nearly 20%. On May 19, a week after Powell's meeting, several cryptocurrencies fell by more than 20% due to Tesla CEO Elon Musk's suspected hint that Tesla would sell its Bitcoin holdings, coupled with China's frequent signals of strengthened regulation. Bitcoin fell by more than $13,000 at one point during trading, nearly breaking the $30,000 mark.</p><p>The Wall Street Insights article also mentioned that by the end of May, Bitcoin had fallen by 37%, the largest monthly drop since 2011. Even Ethereum, which has the smallest monthly decline among mainstream cryptocurrencies, saw a drop of more than 9%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/135b17f50ce3dce1e12479ca9e7b97ad\" tg-width=\"972\" tg-height=\"518\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>","source":"wallstreetcn_api","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The Federal Reserve revealed that Powell had a \"private chat\" with the Coinbase CEO in May.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe Federal Reserve revealed that Powell had a \"private chat\" with the Coinbase CEO in May.\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">华尔街见闻</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-03 08:27</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>The sharp drop in cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin in May of this year may have caught the attention of Federal Reserve leaders.</p><p>Records released by the Federal Reserve this Friday show that Fed Chairman Jerome Powell met with Brian Armstrong, CEO of Coinbase, the largest cryptocurrency exchange in the United States, on May 11, and the meeting lasted 30 minutes. A day later, on the 12th, Powell met again with Christopher Giancarlo, chairman of the CFTC, a former regulator who actively promotes the central bank's digital currency, the digital dollar, for 30 minutes.</p><p>Although the Federal Reserve did not disclose the specifics of Powell's meetings with Armstrong and Giancarlo, and spokespeople for both the Fed and Coinbase declined to comment on the May meetings, Wall Street Insights noted that in the Fed's records, Powell only met with the CEOs of two companies in May: Armstrong and a Wall Street giant.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JPM\">JPMorgan Chase</a>CEO Dimon. Also in May, media reported last year that Federal Reserve Governor Brainard, who was expected to succeed Powell as Federal Reserve Chairman after the Biden administration took office, endorsed central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) in a public speech.</p><p>Brainard stated that month that central bank-backed cryptocurrencies could offer a variety of benefits, reducing counterparty risks, as well as risks to consumer protection and financial stability, while privately issued cryptocurrencies pose multiple risks such as money laundering, threatening consumer protection or creating widespread financial stability risks.</p><p>Coincidentally, in May, when Powell had a \"private chat\" with Armstrong, several cryptocurrencies experienced double-digit drops.</p><p>The Wall Street Insights article mentioned that on May 13, the day after the Powell talks, [the following text appears to be unrelated and possibly machine-generated].<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla</a>The suspension of car payments in Bitcoin and the investigation into Binance, the world's largest cryptocurrency exchange, by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and the Department of Justice have hit several major cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin, with some falling by more than 10%, and some by nearly 20%. On May 19, a week after Powell's meeting, several cryptocurrencies fell by more than 20% due to Tesla CEO Elon Musk's suspected hint that Tesla would sell its Bitcoin holdings, coupled with China's frequent signals of strengthened regulation. Bitcoin fell by more than $13,000 at one point during trading, nearly breaking the $30,000 mark.</p><p>The Wall Street Insights article also mentioned that by the end of May, Bitcoin had fallen by 37%, the largest monthly drop since 2011. Even Ethereum, which has the smallest monthly decline among mainstream cryptocurrencies, saw a drop of more than 9%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/135b17f50ce3dce1e12479ca9e7b97ad\" tg-width=\"972\" tg-height=\"518\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3634483\">华尔街见闻</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/62dafa537afba542bdc43da1b85df8b4","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯","GBTC":"比特币ETF-Grayscale"},"source_url":"https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3634483","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2148801442","content_text":"今年5月比特币等加密货币的大跌可能吸引了美联储领导者的注意。\n美联储本周五公布的纪录显示，联储主席鲍威尔曾在5月11日和美国最大加密货币交易所Coinbase的CEO Brian Armstrong会谈，会晤持续了30分钟。一天后，12日鲍威尔又和积极宣传央行数字货币数字美元的前监管方CFTC主席Christopher Giancarlo会晤，时长也是30分钟。\n虽然美联储未透露鲍威尔同Armstrong和Giancarlo会谈的具体内容，联储和Coinbase的发言人都拒绝就5月的会谈置评，但华尔街见闻注意到，在美联储公布的纪录里，5月鲍威尔只和两名企业的CEO有过会谈，除了Armstrong，另一位是华尔街巨头摩根大通的CEO戴蒙。也是在5月，去年媒体称拜登政府上台后有望接替鲍威尔任美联储主席的联储理事Brainard在公开讲话中为央行数字货币（CBDC）站台。\nBrainard当月称，央行支持的加密货币可能提供多种多样的益处，将减少对手方风险，以及消费者保护和金融稳定的风险，而私人发行的加密货币存在洗钱等多种风险，威胁消费者保护，或者制造大范围的金融稳定风险。\n巧的是，就在鲍威尔同Armstrong“私聊”的5月，多只加密货币都曾遭遇两位数大跌。\n华尔街见闻文章提到，在鲍威尔会谈次日，即5月13日，受特斯拉叫停比特币付款买车和全球最大数币交易所币安遭美国国税局和司法部调查的消息打击，比特币等多只主流加密货币均跌超10%，部分跌近20%；在鲍威尔会谈一周后的5月19日，因特斯拉CEO马斯克疑似暗示特斯拉将抛售所持比特币，加之中国频出加强监管信号，当天多只加密货币跌超20%，比特币盘中一度跌超1.3万美元，险破3万美元关口。\n华尔街见闻文章还提到，到5月末，全月比特币累跌37%，创2011年来最大月跌幅，即使是主流加密货币中月度跌幅相对最小的以太坊，也有9%以上的跌幅。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,"GBTC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1739,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":123421336,"gmtCreate":1624435606025,"gmtModify":1703836599567,"author":{"id":"3576195246415673","authorId":"3576195246415673","name":"Jefflau749","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3b16bea38b728770eeacee83d0ca1b56","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576195246415673","authorIdStr":"3576195246415673"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"?","listText":"?","text":"?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/123421336","repostId":"1136367931","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1136367931","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1624434750,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1136367931?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-23 15:52","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Foxconn responds to new iPhone mass production as early as the end of August: No comment.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1136367931","media":"中国证券报","summary":"6月23日，有媒体报道称，新iPhone预估最快8月底量产，下半年新机备货量估计8500万部至9000万部。6月23日下午，中国证券报记者向苹果iPhone代工厂富士康求证。富士康方面回应称：“不针对","content":"<p><div>On June 23, media reports indicated that the new iPhone is expected to enter mass production as early as the end of August, with an estimated 85 million to 90 million units in stock in the second half of the year. On the afternoon of June 23, a reporter from the China Securities Journal contacted Foxconn, Apple's iPhone contract manufacturer, for verification. Foxconn responded, \"We do not comment on any customers or products.\"</p><p><a href=\"https://finance.sina.com.cn/tech/2021-06-23/doc-ikqcfnca2754610.shtml\">Web page link</a></div></p>","source":"zgzqb","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Foxconn responds to new iPhone mass production as early as the end of August: No comment.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFoxconn responds to new iPhone mass production as early as the end of August: No comment.\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">中国证券报</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-06-23 15:52</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><div>On June 23, media reports indicated that the new iPhone is expected to enter mass production as early as the end of August, with an estimated 85 million to 90 million units in stock in the second half of the year. On the afternoon of June 23, a reporter from the China Securities Journal contacted Foxconn, Apple's iPhone contract manufacturer, for verification. Foxconn responded, \"We do not comment on any customers or products.\"</p><p><a href=\"https://finance.sina.com.cn/tech/2021-06-23/doc-ikqcfnca2754610.shtml\">Web page link</a></div></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"https://finance.sina.com.cn/tech/2021-06-23/doc-ikqcfnca2754610.shtml\">中国证券报</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f4e63a1aa601544badaafd05ced9e865","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://finance.sina.com.cn/tech/2021-06-23/doc-ikqcfnca2754610.shtml","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1136367931","content_text":"6月23日，有媒体报道称，新iPhone预估最快8月底量产，下半年新机备货量估计8500万部至9000万部。6月23日下午，中国证券报记者向苹果iPhone代工厂富士康求证。富士康方面回应称：“不针对任何客户及产品发表评论。”","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AAPL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1847,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":167902408,"gmtCreate":1624241300304,"gmtModify":1703831308026,"author":{"id":"3576195246415673","authorId":"3576195246415673","name":"Jefflau749","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3b16bea38b728770eeacee83d0ca1b56","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576195246415673","authorIdStr":"3576195246415673"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"?","listText":"?","text":"?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":6,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/167902408","repostId":"1139155384","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1139155384","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"提供IPO最新消息，及时更新市场动态，专家团队助力分析可投资项目价值，提供IPO项目咨询服务。","home_visible":1,"media_name":"独角兽早知道","id":"1023683695","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1147954ba5ed4a54ba9a061e9dd405e5"},"pubTimestamp":1624240718,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1139155384?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-21 09:58","market":"hk","language":"zh","title":"Uqhui passed the Hong Kong Stock Exchange hearing, with revenue exceeding HK$2.8 billion in 2020.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1139155384","media":"独角兽早知道","summary":"据港交所6月20日披露，品牌电子商务零售及批发解决方案提供商优趣汇已通过港交所上市聆讯，中金为独家保荐人。\n\n优趣汇是中国领先的品牌电子商务零售及批发解决方案提供商，战略性地专注于日本品牌快速消费品，","content":"<p>According to a disclosure by the Hong Kong Stock Exchange on June 20, U-Qhui, a provider of branded e-commerce retail and wholesale solutions, has passed the listing hearing of the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, with CICC as the sole sponsor.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b34695199c869a86dc6364bdfa98754\" tg-width=\"713\" tg-height=\"607\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Youqhui is a leading provider of branded e-commerce retail and wholesale solutions in China, strategically focusing on Japanese branded fast-moving consumer goods, including, among others, beauty products and personal care products.</p><p>According to a report by Frost & Sullivan, the company achieved a GMV of RMB 4 billion from overseas FMCG brand e-commerce services in 2019, with a market share of 1.2%, ranking tenth in China's overseas FMCG brand e-commerce service market.</p><p>According to the same source, based on the GMV of Japanese branded FMCG sold in China through e-commerce channels in 2019, Uqhui was the number one branded e-commerce solution provider in China with a market share of 5.5%, while the top five service providers in China collectively held a market share of 20% based on GMV in 2019.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9e8885cfa16fe76a48a44e4624c291b2\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"607\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>As Japanese FMCG brands have become increasingly popular and significant players in China's e-commerce business, the market size of e-commerce services for Japanese FMCG brands increased from RMB12.2 billion in 2014 to RMB73.3 billion in 2019, representing a CAGR of 43.1%. According to a report by CIC, it is expected to further grow by 12.6% to RMB 82.5 billion in 2020 and to RMB 111.4 billion in 2024, representing a compound annual growth rate of 8.7% from 2019 to 2024.</p><p>UQHUI's business model involves the company acting as a bridge between Chinese brand partners, e-commerce platforms, and customers, primarily conducting its business through distribution and service fees.</p><p>Under the distribution model, the Company purchases products from selected brand partners, manages the China and cross-border supply chain, identifies and reaches target customers through omnichannel marketing, and sells products to customers through online stores operated by the Company (which the Company refers to as a business-to-customer (B2C) model), or to e-commerce platforms or other distributors who sell products to customers (which the Company refers to as a business-to-business (B2B) model).</p><p>Under the service fee model, as a supplement to the B2C and B2B models, Unqhui also provides solutions to brand partners or other customers and charges service fees. The service fees are usually based on a pre-agreed amount and/or performance-based service fees, which the company refers to as providing services.</p><p>Leveraging UQHUI's extensive industry experience and strong brand analysis and data analysis capabilities, the company assists brand partners in designing operational and marketing strategies for the company's sales through multiple channels under the B2C and B2B models.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0153069158c634af87c7ebd57f17ac22\" tg-width=\"718\" tg-height=\"261\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>UQHui's revenue generated through general trading under the B2B model decreased from RMB1.014 billion in 2019 to RMB842 million in 2020, primarily due to the company ceasing to sell products under some brands in 2020. UQHui's revenue from its service provision business decreased from 2019 to 2020 because the company ceased providing online operation services to TCC in 2020.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1a24da482baa83f17aefd4f5982bf6f0\" tg-width=\"741\" tg-height=\"327\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>As two ways for overseas brands to enter China, general trade and cross-border import differ in terms of timing, cost, regulatory methods, and taxation.</p><p>For general trade, the products sold are stored domestically and the prices offered to end customers are generally higher as customs duties and taxes are generally higher compared to cross-border imports. For cross-border imports, goods are usually imported through bonded warehouses, import duties and taxes for some product categories are usually lower than those under general trade, and the registration and filing procedures are relatively simple.</p><p>As part of its cross-border e-commerce solutions, the company leverages the strengths of UQH Japan and UQH Hong Kong, and has accumulated knowledge and experience in handling customs regulations and policies related to China, Japan, and Hong Kong. Therefore, UQHUI is able to provide brand partners with the best strategies and solutions, taking into account factors such as the characteristics of their products and the regulatory requirements applicable to them.</p><p>In 2018, 2019 and 2020, total revenue derived from sales of Japanese brands accounted for 98.0%, 97.9% and 97.3% of total revenue, while revenue derived from provision of services to them accounted for 1.9%, 1.8% and 1.0% of total revenue, respectively.</p><p>In 2018, 2019 and 2020, sales of Japanese brands recorded 97.1%, 96.8% and 96.0% of the total gross profit, while services provided to them recorded 3.0%, 3.2% and 1.7% of the total gross profit, respectively. In 2018, 2019 and 2020, the gross profit margin of sales of Japanese brands was 24.0%, 28.6% and 31.3%, respectively, while the gross profit margin of revenue derived from services rendered to them was 38.7%, 53.6% and 56.7%, respectively.</p><p>The total revenue from the stores operated by UQHui on its major e-commerce platforms increased from RMB1,086 million in 2018 to RMB1,516 million in 2020, primarily due to the increase in revenue from the cross-border e-commerce stores operated by the Company on its major e-commerce platforms.</p><p>In 2019 and 2020, Uqhui saw a net increase of 15 and 9 stores operated on major e-commerce platforms for cross-border e-commerce, respectively. Revenue from general trading stores on major e-commerce platforms decreased from RMB640 million in 2018 to RMB590 million in 2019, primarily due to the company no longer providing services to a beauty product brand (which saw a significant increase in sales in 2018). Sales revenue in 2018 and 2019 was RMB134 million and RMB11.8 million, respectively, accounting for 5.3% and 0.4% of the company's total revenue for the same period.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Uqhui passed the Hong Kong Stock Exchange hearing, with revenue exceeding HK$2.8 billion in 2020.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUqhui passed the Hong Kong Stock Exchange hearing, with revenue exceeding HK$2.8 billion in 2020.\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1023683695\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/1147954ba5ed4a54ba9a061e9dd405e5);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">独角兽早知道 </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-06-21 09:58</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>According to a disclosure by the Hong Kong Stock Exchange on June 20, U-Qhui, a provider of branded e-commerce retail and wholesale solutions, has passed the listing hearing of the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, with CICC as the sole sponsor.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b34695199c869a86dc6364bdfa98754\" tg-width=\"713\" tg-height=\"607\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Youqhui is a leading provider of branded e-commerce retail and wholesale solutions in China, strategically focusing on Japanese branded fast-moving consumer goods, including, among others, beauty products and personal care products.</p><p>According to a report by Frost & Sullivan, the company achieved a GMV of RMB 4 billion from overseas FMCG brand e-commerce services in 2019, with a market share of 1.2%, ranking tenth in China's overseas FMCG brand e-commerce service market.</p><p>According to the same source, based on the GMV of Japanese branded FMCG sold in China through e-commerce channels in 2019, Uqhui was the number one branded e-commerce solution provider in China with a market share of 5.5%, while the top five service providers in China collectively held a market share of 20% based on GMV in 2019.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9e8885cfa16fe76a48a44e4624c291b2\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"607\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>As Japanese FMCG brands have become increasingly popular and significant players in China's e-commerce business, the market size of e-commerce services for Japanese FMCG brands increased from RMB12.2 billion in 2014 to RMB73.3 billion in 2019, representing a CAGR of 43.1%. According to a report by CIC, it is expected to further grow by 12.6% to RMB 82.5 billion in 2020 and to RMB 111.4 billion in 2024, representing a compound annual growth rate of 8.7% from 2019 to 2024.</p><p>UQHUI's business model involves the company acting as a bridge between Chinese brand partners, e-commerce platforms, and customers, primarily conducting its business through distribution and service fees.</p><p>Under the distribution model, the Company purchases products from selected brand partners, manages the China and cross-border supply chain, identifies and reaches target customers through omnichannel marketing, and sells products to customers through online stores operated by the Company (which the Company refers to as a business-to-customer (B2C) model), or to e-commerce platforms or other distributors who sell products to customers (which the Company refers to as a business-to-business (B2B) model).</p><p>Under the service fee model, as a supplement to the B2C and B2B models, Unqhui also provides solutions to brand partners or other customers and charges service fees. The service fees are usually based on a pre-agreed amount and/or performance-based service fees, which the company refers to as providing services.</p><p>Leveraging UQHUI's extensive industry experience and strong brand analysis and data analysis capabilities, the company assists brand partners in designing operational and marketing strategies for the company's sales through multiple channels under the B2C and B2B models.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0153069158c634af87c7ebd57f17ac22\" tg-width=\"718\" tg-height=\"261\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>UQHui's revenue generated through general trading under the B2B model decreased from RMB1.014 billion in 2019 to RMB842 million in 2020, primarily due to the company ceasing to sell products under some brands in 2020. UQHui's revenue from its service provision business decreased from 2019 to 2020 because the company ceased providing online operation services to TCC in 2020.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1a24da482baa83f17aefd4f5982bf6f0\" tg-width=\"741\" tg-height=\"327\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>As two ways for overseas brands to enter China, general trade and cross-border import differ in terms of timing, cost, regulatory methods, and taxation.</p><p>For general trade, the products sold are stored domestically and the prices offered to end customers are generally higher as customs duties and taxes are generally higher compared to cross-border imports. For cross-border imports, goods are usually imported through bonded warehouses, import duties and taxes for some product categories are usually lower than those under general trade, and the registration and filing procedures are relatively simple.</p><p>As part of its cross-border e-commerce solutions, the company leverages the strengths of UQH Japan and UQH Hong Kong, and has accumulated knowledge and experience in handling customs regulations and policies related to China, Japan, and Hong Kong. Therefore, UQHUI is able to provide brand partners with the best strategies and solutions, taking into account factors such as the characteristics of their products and the regulatory requirements applicable to them.</p><p>In 2018, 2019 and 2020, total revenue derived from sales of Japanese brands accounted for 98.0%, 97.9% and 97.3% of total revenue, while revenue derived from provision of services to them accounted for 1.9%, 1.8% and 1.0% of total revenue, respectively.</p><p>In 2018, 2019 and 2020, sales of Japanese brands recorded 97.1%, 96.8% and 96.0% of the total gross profit, while services provided to them recorded 3.0%, 3.2% and 1.7% of the total gross profit, respectively. In 2018, 2019 and 2020, the gross profit margin of sales of Japanese brands was 24.0%, 28.6% and 31.3%, respectively, while the gross profit margin of revenue derived from services rendered to them was 38.7%, 53.6% and 56.7%, respectively.</p><p>The total revenue from the stores operated by UQHui on its major e-commerce platforms increased from RMB1,086 million in 2018 to RMB1,516 million in 2020, primarily due to the increase in revenue from the cross-border e-commerce stores operated by the Company on its major e-commerce platforms.</p><p>In 2019 and 2020, Uqhui saw a net increase of 15 and 9 stores operated on major e-commerce platforms for cross-border e-commerce, respectively. Revenue from general trading stores on major e-commerce platforms decreased from RMB640 million in 2018 to RMB590 million in 2019, primarily due to the company no longer providing services to a beauty product brand (which saw a significant increase in sales in 2018). Sales revenue in 2018 and 2019 was RMB134 million and RMB11.8 million, respectively, accounting for 5.3% and 0.4% of the company's total revenue for the same period.</p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/26d35a88c8d9d9d46abd395d2bd24396","relate_stocks":{"02177":"优趣汇控股"},"is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1139155384","content_text":"据港交所6月20日披露，品牌电子商务零售及批发解决方案提供商优趣汇已通过港交所上市聆讯，中金为独家保荐人。\n\n优趣汇是中国领先的品牌电子商务零售及批发解决方案提供商，战略性地专注于日本品牌快速消费品，包括（其中包括）美妆产品及个人护理产品。\n根据灼识咨询报告，公司于2019年自海外快速消费品品牌电子商务服务获得GMV人民币40亿元，市场份额为1.2%，位列中国海外快速消费品品牌电子商务服务市场第十名。\n根据同一资料来源，按2019年通过电子商务渠道在中国出售的日本品牌快速消费品GMV计，优趣汇是中国排名第一的品牌电子商务解决方案提供商，市场份额为5.5%，而按2019年的GMV计，中国前五大服务提供商合共拥有20%的市场份额。\n\n由于日本快速消费品品牌已日益普及并成为中国电子商务业务的重要参与者，日本快速消费品品牌电子商务服务市场规模从2014年的人民币122亿元增至2019年的人民币733亿元，复合年增长率为43.1%。根据灼识咨询报告，预期于2020年进一步增长12.6%至人民币825亿元，于2024年进一步增长至人民币1,114亿元，2019年至2024年复合年增长率为8.7%。\n优趣汇的业务模式公司充当中国品牌合作伙伴、电子商务平台及客户之间的桥梁，主要通过分销方式及服务费方式经营公司的业务。\n在分销方式下，公司向选定的品牌合作伙伴购买产品，管理中国及跨境供应链，通过全渠道营销识别及接触目标客户，并通过公司所经营的网店向客户出售产品（公司称之为企业对客户(B2C)模式），或向电子商务平台或其他分销商出售产品，该等电子商务平台或分销商将产品售予客户（公司称之为企业对企业(B2B)模式）。\n在服务费方式下，作为对B2C及B2B模式的补充，优趣汇亦向品牌合作伙伴或其他客户提供解决方案，并收取服务费，服务费通常以预先约定的金额及╱或绩效服务费用为准，公司称之为提供服务业务。\n凭借优趣汇深厚的行业经验以及强大的品牌分析及数据分析能力，公司协助品牌合作伙伴通过B2C及B2B模式下的多个渠道设计公司销售的运营及营销策略。\n\n优趣汇通过一般贸易于B2B模式下产生的收入由2019年的人民币10.14亿元减少至2020年的人民币8.42亿元，乃主要由于公司在2020年不再销售一些品牌旗下的产品。优趣汇的提供服务业务所得收入于2019年至2020年有所减少，原因为公司于2020年停止为TCC提供在线运营服务。\n\n作为海外品牌进入中国的两种方式，一般贸易及跨境进口在时间、成本、监管方式及税收等方面不同。\n就一般贸易而言，所售产品存放于境内，由于关税及税收较跨境进口而言通常较高，故向终端客户提供的价格亦通常较高。就跨境进口而言，货物通常通过保税仓库进口，部分产品类别的进口关税及税收通常较一般贸易项下的关税及税收更低，且登记及备案程序亦相对轻简。\n作为跨境电子商务解决方案的一部分，公司利用日本优趣汇及优趣汇香港的优势，并在处理中国、日本及香港海关相关的法规及政策中积累知识及经验。因此，优趣汇能够为品牌合作伙伴提供最佳战略及解决方案，当中考虑其产品特性及适用于他们的监管要求等因素。\n于2018年、2019年及2020年，日本品牌销售所得的全部收入分别占总收入的98.0%、97.9%及97.3%，而向其提供服务所得收入分别占总收入的1.9%、1.8%及1.0%。\n于2018年、2019年及2020年，日本品牌销售分别录得总毛利的97.1%、96.8%及96.0%，而向其提供服务分别录得总毛利的3.0%、3.2%及1.7%。于2018年、2019年及2020年，日本品牌销售的毛利率分别为24.0%、28.6%及31.3%，而向其提供服务所得收入的毛利率分别为38.7%、53.6%及56.7%。\n优趣汇于主要电子商务平台上所运营店铺的总收入由2018年的人民币10.86亿元增加至2020年的人民币15.16亿元，乃主要由于公司于主要电子商务平台上所运营跨境电子商务店铺的收入增加。\n于2019年及2020年，优趣汇就跨境电子商务于主要电子商务平台上所运营的店铺分别净增加15间及9间，于主要电子商务平台自一般贸易店铺录得的收入自2018年的人民币6.4亿元减少至2019年的人民币5.9亿元，乃主要由于公司不再向一个美妆产品品牌品牌（于2018年的销售额大幅增长）提供服务，于2018年及2019年的销售收入分别为人民币1.34亿元及人民币1180万元，占公司同期总收入的5.3%及0.4%。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"02177":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2528,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":160628852,"gmtCreate":1623796738576,"gmtModify":1703819463780,"author":{"id":"3576195246415673","authorId":"3576195246415673","name":"Jefflau749","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3b16bea38b728770eeacee83d0ca1b56","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576195246415673","authorIdStr":"3576195246415673"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"?","listText":"?","text":"?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/160628852","repostId":"1134804844","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1134804844","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1623770805,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1134804844?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-15 23:26","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Morgan Stanley predicts that inflation expectations may have peaked. With shrinking balance sheet approaching, how should one invest?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1134804844","media":"第一财经","summary":"年初从成长到周期的轮动速度开始放缓，机构认为这一时期更应该均衡配置。\n\n为何美国通胀数据创下13年新高仍未动摇投资者情绪？美债收益率为何不涨反跌？紧缩周期临近应该怎么投？这些都是盘桓在近期投资者心中的","content":"<p><div>At the beginning of the year, the rotation from growth to cycle began to slow down, and institutions believe that a more balanced allocation is necessary during this period. Why did US inflation data hit a 13-year high but still not shake investor sentiment? Why did US Treasury yields fall instead of rising? How should one invest as a tightening cycle approaches? These are all huge questions that have been lingering in the minds of investors recently. Morgan Stanley recently stated that economic growth and inflation are expected to remain quite strong next year. However, the first quarter of this year experienced exceptionally strong demand, which may indicate that the rate of growth and inflation has peaked. The US market seems to agree with this, causing bond yields to peak and then fall...</p><p><a href=\"https://www.yicai.com/news/101082673.html\">Web page link</a></div></p>","source":"dyvj","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Morgan Stanley predicts that inflation expectations may have peaked. With shrinking balance sheet approaching, how should one invest?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nMorgan Stanley predicts that inflation expectations may have peaked. With shrinking balance sheet approaching, how should one invest?\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">第一财经</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-06-15 23:26</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><div>At the beginning of the year, the rotation from growth to cycle began to slow down, and institutions believe that a more balanced allocation is necessary during this period. Why did US inflation data hit a 13-year high but still not shake investor sentiment? Why did US Treasury yields fall instead of rising? How should one invest as a tightening cycle approaches? These are all huge questions that have been lingering in the minds of investors recently. Morgan Stanley recently stated that economic growth and inflation are expected to remain quite strong next year. However, the first quarter of this year experienced exceptionally strong demand, which may indicate that the rate of growth and inflation has peaked. The US market seems to agree with this, causing bond yields to peak and then fall...</p><p><a href=\"https://www.yicai.com/news/101082673.html\">Web page link</a></div></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"https://www.yicai.com/news/101082673.html\">第一财经</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c318bcd91a109139b7d70c76c30bb154","relate_stocks":{"MS":"摩根士丹利"},"source_url":"https://www.yicai.com/news/101082673.html","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1134804844","content_text":"年初从成长到周期的轮动速度开始放缓，机构认为这一时期更应该均衡配置。\n\n为何美国通胀数据创下13年新高仍未动摇投资者情绪？美债收益率为何不涨反跌？紧缩周期临近应该怎么投？这些都是盘桓在近期投资者心中的巨大疑问。\n摩根士丹利最新表示，明年经济增长和通胀预计仍将相当强劲。然而，今年第一季度经历了异常旺盛的需求，可能标志着增长和通胀的上升速率已达峰值。美国市场似乎也认同这一点，债券收益率因此触顶回落，一些周期性较强的股票也出现盘整。在一季度盈利大幅上修后，大摩现在认为未来继续上修的空间有限，毕竟一季度发生的一些事情未来不太会重复——经济重启叠加巨大的财政刺激带动了消费，加密市场泡沫也强化了财富效应。\n市场预计，本周举行的美联储议息会议将开始讨论缩减买债规模的问题。随着紧缩周期不断临近，投资策略也不同于早周期，盈利增速将成主要驱动力。年初从成长到周期的轮动速度开始放缓，机构认为这一时期更应该均衡配置。\n通胀预期可能触顶\n数据显示，美国5月整体CPI同比大涨5%，超过预期的4.7%，增速创2008年8月以来最高；剔除不稳定的食品与能源价格的核心CPI年率达3.8%，同样超过市场预期的3.5%，增速创1992年以来新高。\n\n美国整体通胀率。来源：Wind，美国劳工部\n然而，在6月10日上述数据发布后，10年期美债收益率不涨反跌，收盘仅报1.454%。美股也照涨不误，标普500指数上周五收于4247.44点，距离突破历史新高的4249.74点仅一步之遥。\n大摩认为，这背后的原因可能在于，通胀预期或已经近乎见顶。\n摩根士丹利首席美股策略师威尔逊（Michael J Wilson）对记者表示，通胀保值债券（TIPS）市场此前已变得非常拥挤，特别是在零售市场，因此无论通胀数据结果如何，回调的时机已经成熟；盈亏平衡通胀率已经反映了市场对通胀的乐观预期，达到10年高点；此外，企业和消费者调查都表明，他们对通胀的预期发生了变化，认为通胀是更持续性的而非间歇性的，这一点很重要，因为预期可以导致行为变化。\n“尽管所有这些指标都大幅走高，但它们似乎也已见顶，10年期国债名义收益率和盈亏平衡收益率已触顶回落。这可能是一个早期信号，表明后续经济增长和通胀都可能不及目前过高的预期。”威尔逊称。\n影响这一预期的关键仍和需求水平有关。一季度高达1.9万亿美元的财政刺激拉动了消费，叠加加密货币扩张又带来了近1万亿美元的财富效应。但机构认为，这两种情况都不太可能在二、三季度重演，这也会逐步体现在经济增速和通胀数据上。\n从名义利率拆解来看，2月中旬之前，美债收益率快速攀升主要受通胀预期回升驱动。疫情后美国经济加速复苏，叠加拜登政府推岀的一轮轮大规模财政刺激，通胀预期不断升温，彼时实际利率受疫情反复等因素的影响持续磨底。\n在突破1.3%后，通胀预期趋于缓和，实际利率替代通胀预期成为推动美债收益率快速上行的核心因素，这也意味着彼时市场的关注点更多落在经济数据的改善上。近期美债收益率的下行，更多则源于通胀预期和实际利率的同步走弱。隐含通胀预期从5月峰值下降近19BP，与CPI连续两个月的大幅上涨形成了鲜明对比。显然，美联储官员以及美国财长耶伦关于“通胀上升是暂时的”的说法终于让市场开始买账了，投资者开始相信，供给短缺造成的涨价将会缓解，且服务性需求的攀升也不可能一直持续下去。\n\n另一些因素可能也在推动收益率下行。景顺首席全球市场策略师Kristina Hooper对记者表示，债市正在对某些国家的新冠肺炎疫情未能受控的担忧做出反应，尤其是在更令人担忧的Delta变异病毒株迅速传播的情况下，这可能会抑制经济增长。Delta变异病毒株占英国新病例的90%，并且很可能成为美国的主要毒株；此外，美国以外的投资者仍被美国国债所吸引，特别是考虑到欧元区的利率非常低。上周的一个催化剂是美元走软，这刺激了外国购买美国政府债券。\n紧缩周期前夕应均衡配置\n不过，通胀预期触顶并不代表通胀会很快下行，更不代表全球央行尤其是美联储永远不“收水”。\nKristina Hooper预计，本周举行的美联储议息会议将开始讨论缩减买债规模的问题，可能会在夏末的杰克逊·霍尔会议（Jackson Hole）上宣布缩表时间点，并于秋季开始实行。但市场可能还没有准备好接受这个消息，预计美债收益率可能在下半年上升。\n历史数据也显示，即使在经济增长动能见顶放缓、流动性边际收紧的时期，股市表现仍可能保持良好，盈利增长是驱动股价攀升的关键。当然回报往往会弱于经济强劲增长的时期。在行业配置上，比起在上一个阶段侧重于顺周期板块的配置，在当前的中周期，行业配置就需要在长期可持续成长和顺周期板块中求取平衡。\n年初以来，从成长到价值的板块轮动加速。但事实上，5月以来，早周期板块相较于标普500的表现已明显触顶回落，这也和美债收益率触顶回落的时间点吻合。\n\n大摩认为，在成长（growth）和价值/周期性行业（value）之间，后疫情时代的每股收益驱动因素将更加均衡，消费者服务、运输、能源和资本物品等板块预计将成为价值/周期板块的重要增长驱动力，这和过去两年有较大不同，当时每股收益增长主要集中在科技和通信服务。\n未来，更高的利润率预期主要是由科技、互联网和制药行业推动的。就不同板块对整体营业利润的贡献来看，科技公司仍占主导。具体而言，传媒和娱乐行业(以谷歌和脸书主导）的利润增长几乎占预期利润增长的四分之一，软件/服务占17%，零售服务占16%（其中亚马逊一家公司就贡献了近三分之二），半导体占12%，科技硬件占10%，制药占11%。\n之所以这一时期要均衡配置，也是因为从绝对角度看，大摩认为预期利润率涨幅最大的是科技股和一些周期性行业，部分周期性行业在经历了上半年的大涨后，后续行情仍有望延续，包括汽车、耐用消费品/服装、多元金融(资管公司、投行、经纪公司)、能源和材料等。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"MS":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1853,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":188231743,"gmtCreate":1623445594882,"gmtModify":1704203800733,"author":{"id":"3576195246415673","authorId":"3576195246415673","name":"Jefflau749","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3b16bea38b728770eeacee83d0ca1b56","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576195246415673","authorIdStr":"3576195246415673"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"WOW","listText":"WOW","text":"WOW","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/188231743","repostId":"1156959915","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1156959915","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"为用户提供金融资讯、行情、数据，旨在帮助投资者理解世界，做投资决策。","home_visible":1,"media_name":"老虎资讯综合","id":"102","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1623429803,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1156959915?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-12 00:43","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Tiger Brokers helped BOSS Zhipin list on Nasdaq, which opened 75% higher on its first day of trading.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1156959915","media":"老虎资讯综合","summary":"北京时间6月12日，BOSS直聘登陆纳斯达克，首日开涨75%。\n老虎证券作为互联网承销商，与高盛、摩根士丹利、UBS、华兴、海通等国际知名大行同列BOSS直聘招股书封面，展现出老虎证券作为头部互联网科","content":"<p>On June 12, Beijing time, BOSS Zhipin listed on Nasdaq, rising 75% on its first day.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/57551fd25362c75885fbb928efe43f8a\"></p><p>As an internet underwriter, Tiger Brokers was featured on the cover of BOSS Zhipin's prospectus alongside internationally renowned banks such as Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, UBS, China Renaissance, and Haitong, demonstrating Tiger Brokers' influence as a leading internet technology investment bank.<br></p><p><br></p><p>According to the latest prospectus, BOSS Zhipin will publicly issue 48 million American Depositary Shares (ADSs) at a price of $19 per share, raising approximately $912 million, with a total market capitalization of $7.599 billion at the opening.</p><p>This valuation has surpassed the combined valuation of 51job, which is publicly valued at $5 billion, and Zhaopin.com, which is only valued at $1.7 billion in the private equity market due to delisting, making it the most valuable Chinese recruitment platform.</p><p>Of course, achieving such a high valuation indicates, to some extent, that BOSS Zhipin has also gained recognition from the capital market for its financial performance.</p><p><b>Financial Performance</b></p><p>BOSS Zhipin's recent financial performance can be summarized as follows: strong revenue growth momentum; Gross profit grew strongly, and the gross profit margin remained stable; Although operating profit is low, it has already achieved a turnaround from loss to profit; Operating cash flow surged.</p><p>Specifically, BOSS Zhipin's revenue reached $298 million in 2020, a surge of 95.4% compared to $152 million in 2019. In the first quarter of 2021, the company's revenue reached $120 million, a year-on-year increase of 178.9%.</p><p>BOSS Zhipin's gross profit was $261 million in 2020, a 98.7% increase from $131 million in 2019, while it reached $104 million in the first quarter of 2021, a year-on-year increase of 178.4%. Meanwhile, the company's gross profit margins remained almost unchanged at 86.20%, 87.65% and 86.45% in 2019, 2020 and the first quarter of 2021, respectively.</p><p>In 2019, 2020, and the first quarter of 2021, BOSS Zhipin achieved operating profits of US$392,800, US$1,356,000, and US$350,000 and US$400,000, respectively, with operating profit margins of 0.3%, 0.5%, and 0.3%. During the same period, the company reported net losses of US$112 million, US$188 million and US$40.972 million, respectively.</p><p>In 2019, 2020, and the first quarter of 2021, BOSS Zhipin's operating cash flow was -$16.1318 million, $60.676 million, and $25.235 million, respectively.</p><p>As of March 31, 2021, BOSS Zhipin held $626 million in cash and $332 million in liabilities. During the twelve months ended March 31, 2021, the company had free cash flow of US$102 million.</p><p><b>Research Analysis</b></p><p>BOSS Zhipin hopes to gain support from the US capital market to help them continue their expansion in the Chinese market.</p><p>Judging from the company's financial performance, their revenue and gross profit margin have grown rapidly, and they have achieved a turnaround from loss to profit at the operational level. The free cash flow as of March 31, 2021, exceeded $101 million, which is impressive.</p><p>In China, the market for providing online recruitment services for job seekers and employers is huge and has a promising future.</p><p>Goldman Sachs is the lead underwriter for this transaction. Over the past twelve months, the company has led the underwriting of IPO shares with an average return of 42.9%, which is in the middle range compared to the performance of all major underwriters during the same period.</p><p>The number one risk facing BOSS Zhipin is that the company may face a series of competitive pressures, such as talent networks or other mainstream international recruitment companies entering their markets. Once these become a reality, they will threaten their growth prospects or force them to significantly increase marketing spending, suppressing profitability.</p><p>China's various high-margin online businesses often eventually attract a large number of competitors, and the main means of competition is price wars, which is obviously not good news for the future returns of stocks.</p><p>From a valuation perspective, the price BOSS Zhipin offered to US IPO investors implies a company value-to-revenue ratio of around 19.2. Although this figure is higher than the current overall level of software-as-a-service stocks, BOSS Zhipin's revenue growth momentum is stronger. They have already crossed the profitability threshold at the operational level and generated considerable free cash flow.</p><p>Therefore, although BOSS Zhipin's IPO price is not cheap, it is still worth paying attention to for investors interested in the growth prospects of China's online recruitment market.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/361ada34c84eeaafbb2e860b6eb0db6f\"></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tiger Brokers helped BOSS Zhipin list on Nasdaq, which opened 75% higher on its first day of trading.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTiger Brokers helped BOSS Zhipin list on Nasdaq, which opened 75% higher on its first day of trading.\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/102\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">老虎资讯综合 </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-06-12 00:43</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>On June 12, Beijing time, BOSS Zhipin listed on Nasdaq, rising 75% on its first day.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/57551fd25362c75885fbb928efe43f8a\"></p><p>As an internet underwriter, Tiger Brokers was featured on the cover of BOSS Zhipin's prospectus alongside internationally renowned banks such as Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, UBS, China Renaissance, and Haitong, demonstrating Tiger Brokers' influence as a leading internet technology investment bank.<br></p><p><br></p><p>According to the latest prospectus, BOSS Zhipin will publicly issue 48 million American Depositary Shares (ADSs) at a price of $19 per share, raising approximately $912 million, with a total market capitalization of $7.599 billion at the opening.</p><p>This valuation has surpassed the combined valuation of 51job, which is publicly valued at $5 billion, and Zhaopin.com, which is only valued at $1.7 billion in the private equity market due to delisting, making it the most valuable Chinese recruitment platform.</p><p>Of course, achieving such a high valuation indicates, to some extent, that BOSS Zhipin has also gained recognition from the capital market for its financial performance.</p><p><b>Financial Performance</b></p><p>BOSS Zhipin's recent financial performance can be summarized as follows: strong revenue growth momentum; Gross profit grew strongly, and the gross profit margin remained stable; Although operating profit is low, it has already achieved a turnaround from loss to profit; Operating cash flow surged.</p><p>Specifically, BOSS Zhipin's revenue reached $298 million in 2020, a surge of 95.4% compared to $152 million in 2019. In the first quarter of 2021, the company's revenue reached $120 million, a year-on-year increase of 178.9%.</p><p>BOSS Zhipin's gross profit was $261 million in 2020, a 98.7% increase from $131 million in 2019, while it reached $104 million in the first quarter of 2021, a year-on-year increase of 178.4%. Meanwhile, the company's gross profit margins remained almost unchanged at 86.20%, 87.65% and 86.45% in 2019, 2020 and the first quarter of 2021, respectively.</p><p>In 2019, 2020, and the first quarter of 2021, BOSS Zhipin achieved operating profits of US$392,800, US$1,356,000, and US$350,000 and US$400,000, respectively, with operating profit margins of 0.3%, 0.5%, and 0.3%. During the same period, the company reported net losses of US$112 million, US$188 million and US$40.972 million, respectively.</p><p>In 2019, 2020, and the first quarter of 2021, BOSS Zhipin's operating cash flow was -$16.1318 million, $60.676 million, and $25.235 million, respectively.</p><p>As of March 31, 2021, BOSS Zhipin held $626 million in cash and $332 million in liabilities. During the twelve months ended March 31, 2021, the company had free cash flow of US$102 million.</p><p><b>Research Analysis</b></p><p>BOSS Zhipin hopes to gain support from the US capital market to help them continue their expansion in the Chinese market.</p><p>Judging from the company's financial performance, their revenue and gross profit margin have grown rapidly, and they have achieved a turnaround from loss to profit at the operational level. The free cash flow as of March 31, 2021, exceeded $101 million, which is impressive.</p><p>In China, the market for providing online recruitment services for job seekers and employers is huge and has a promising future.</p><p>Goldman Sachs is the lead underwriter for this transaction. Over the past twelve months, the company has led the underwriting of IPO shares with an average return of 42.9%, which is in the middle range compared to the performance of all major underwriters during the same period.</p><p>The number one risk facing BOSS Zhipin is that the company may face a series of competitive pressures, such as talent networks or other mainstream international recruitment companies entering their markets. Once these become a reality, they will threaten their growth prospects or force them to significantly increase marketing spending, suppressing profitability.</p><p>China's various high-margin online businesses often eventually attract a large number of competitors, and the main means of competition is price wars, which is obviously not good news for the future returns of stocks.</p><p>From a valuation perspective, the price BOSS Zhipin offered to US IPO investors implies a company value-to-revenue ratio of around 19.2. Although this figure is higher than the current overall level of software-as-a-service stocks, BOSS Zhipin's revenue growth momentum is stronger. They have already crossed the profitability threshold at the operational level and generated considerable free cash flow.</p><p>Therefore, although BOSS Zhipin's IPO price is not cheap, it is still worth paying attention to for investors interested in the growth prospects of China's online recruitment market.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/361ada34c84eeaafbb2e860b6eb0db6f\"></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3aee31599ee7010691cc73f0ff8ac182","relate_stocks":{"BZ":"BOSS直聘"},"is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1156959915","content_text":"北京时间6月12日，BOSS直聘登陆纳斯达克，首日开涨75%。\n老虎证券作为互联网承销商，与高盛、摩根士丹利、UBS、华兴、海通等国际知名大行同列BOSS直聘招股书封面，展现出老虎证券作为头部互联网科技投行的影响力。\n\n根据最新招股书信息显示，BOSS直聘将公开发行4800万股美国存托股份（ADS），发行价定为每股19美元，募资约9.12亿美元，总市值开盘时是75.99亿美元。\n而这个估值已经超过公开估值50亿美元的前程无忧和由于退市只能在私募基金市场有估值17亿美元的智联招聘之和，成为估值最高的中国招聘平台。\n当然，能达到如此高额的估值，在一定程度上表明BOSS直聘也有着自己的在财务上的表现得到了资本市场的认可。\n财务表现\nBOSS直聘近期的财务表现大约可以做如下概括：营收增长势头强劲；毛利润增长强劲，毛利润率保持稳定；运营利润虽然低，但是已经实现了扭亏为盈；运营现金流猛增。\n具体而言，BOSS直聘2020年营收达到了2.98亿美元，较之2019年的1.52亿美元猛增95.4%之多，而2021年第一季度，公司营收就达到了1.20亿美元，同比增幅更高达178.9%。\nBOSS直聘毛利润2020年为2.61亿美元，较之2019年的1.31亿美元增长98.7%，而2021年第一季度达到1.04亿美元，同比增幅高达178.4%。与此同时，在2019年、2020年和2021年第一季度当中，公司毛利润率分别为86.20%、87.65%和86.45%，几乎保持不变。\n2019年、2020年和2021年第一季度，BOSS直聘分别实现运营利润39.28万美元、135.60万美元和35、40万美元，运营利润率分别为0.3%、0.5%和0.3%。同期内，公司净亏损分别为1.12亿美元、1.88亿美元和4097.20万美元。\n2019年、2020年和2021年第一季度，BOSS直聘运营现金流分别为-1613.18万美元、6067.60万美元和2523.50万美元。\n截至2021年3月31日，BOSS直聘持有现金6.26亿美元，负债3.32亿美元。截至2021年3月31日的十二个月内，公司自由现金流为1.02亿美元。\n研究分析\nBOSS直聘希望获得美国资本市场的支持，帮助他们在中国市场上继续扩张。\n从公司的财务表现看，他们营收和毛利润率增长迅猛，运营层面已经实现扭亏为盈。截至2021年3月31日的自由现金流超过1.01亿美元，令人印象深刻。\n在中国，为求职者和雇主提供线上招聘服务，市场体量是很巨大的，前景是很可观的。\n高盛是本次交易的领衔承销商，在过去十二个月时间内，该公司领衔承销的IPO股票，平均回报率为42.9%，在所有主要承销商同期业绩的比较当中位于中游水平。\nBOSS直聘面前的头号风险是，该公司可能会面对一系列竞争压力，比如人才网络，或者其他主流国际招聘公司进入他们所在的市场，而这些一旦成为现实，就将威胁到他们的增长前景，或者是迫使他们大幅提升营销支出，打压盈利能力。\n中国各种利润率较高的线上业务，往往最终都会吸引大量竞争者，而最主要的竞争手段就是大打价格战，而这对于股票未来的回报显然不是什么好消息。\n从估值角度看，BOSS直聘为美国IPO投资者开出的价格意味着公司企业价值营收比率为19.2左右，虽然这一数字高于软件即服务股票当前的总体水平，但是BOSS直聘的营收增长势头更为强劲，他们已经在运营层面越过盈利门槛，并且产生了可观的自由现金流。\n因此，虽然BOSS直聘IPO价格称不上低廉，但是对于那些有意于中国线上招聘市场成长前景的投资者而言，这一股票还是值得关注的。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"BZ":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1927,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":894738668,"gmtCreate":1628855447654,"gmtModify":1676529875686,"author":{"id":"3576195246415673","authorId":"3576195246415673","name":"Jefflau749","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3b16bea38b728770eeacee83d0ca1b56","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576195246415673","authorIdStr":"3576195246415673"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AABB\">$Asia Broadband, Inc.(AABB)$</a>good","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AABB\">$Asia Broadband, Inc.(AABB)$</a>good","text":"$Asia Broadband, Inc.(AABB)$good","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/60ebbb9cb8c8c359560505d4db9c38bc","width":"1200","height":"2133"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":15,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/894738668","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2401,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":172707455,"gmtCreate":1626991903677,"gmtModify":1703481844263,"author":{"id":"3576195246415673","authorId":"3576195246415673","name":"Jefflau749","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3b16bea38b728770eeacee83d0ca1b56","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576195246415673","authorIdStr":"3576195246415673"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"ya XD","listText":"ya XD","text":"ya XD","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":12,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/172707455","repostId":"2153674116","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2153674116","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626964221,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2153674116?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-22 22:30","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Tesla has partnered with a giant to address its \"biggest concern\" regarding battery production expansion.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2153674116","media":"上海证券报","summary":"特斯拉又“牵手”了一大巨头。\n澳大利亚矿业巨头必和必拓7月22日宣布，与特斯拉签署镍供应协议，必和必拓旗下的西部镍业（Nickel West）将为特斯拉提供作为电池制造原料的镍。\n对于具体的合作内容，","content":"<p><div>Tesla has once again partnered with a major giant. Australian mining giant BHP Billiton announced on July 22 that it has signed a Nickel supply agreement with Tesla, under which BHP Billiton's Nickel West will provide Tesla with Nickel as a raw material for battery manufacturing. BHP Billiton has not disclosed the specific details of the cooperation. Nickel is one of the important raw materials for the production of power batteries, mainly used in ternary material batteries. Data from the China Automotive Power Battery Industry Innovation Alliance shows that in the first half of 2021, China's ternary lithium battery production reached 36.9 GWh, accounting for 49.3% of the total output, representing a year-on-year cumulative increase...</p><p><a href=\"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN202107222219457c23f505&s=b\">Web page link</a></div></p>","source":"shzqb","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla has partnered with a giant to address its \"biggest concern\" regarding battery production expansion.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla has partnered with a giant to address its \"biggest concern\" regarding battery production expansion.\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">上海证券报</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-22 22:30</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><div>Tesla has once again partnered with a major giant. Australian mining giant BHP Billiton announced on July 22 that it has signed a Nickel supply agreement with Tesla, under which BHP Billiton's Nickel West will provide Tesla with Nickel as a raw material for battery manufacturing. BHP Billiton has not disclosed the specific details of the cooperation. Nickel is one of the important raw materials for the production of power batteries, mainly used in ternary material batteries. Data from the China Automotive Power Battery Industry Innovation Alliance shows that in the first half of 2021, China's ternary lithium battery production reached 36.9 GWh, accounting for 49.3% of the total output, representing a year-on-year cumulative increase...</p><p><a href=\"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN202107222219457c23f505&s=b\">Web page link</a></div></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN202107222219457c23f505&s=b\">上海证券报</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8350896f4f33c86bc28f200b67ab82b4","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN202107222219457c23f505&s=b","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2153674116","content_text":"特斯拉又“牵手”了一大巨头。\n澳大利亚矿业巨头必和必拓7月22日宣布，与特斯拉签署镍供应协议，必和必拓旗下的西部镍业（Nickel West）将为特斯拉提供作为电池制造原料的镍。\n对于具体的合作内容，必和必拓没有公开。\n镍是生产动力电池的重要原材料之一，主要应用于三元材料电池。中国汽车动力电池产业创新联盟数据显示，2021年上半年，国内三元材料电池产量为36.9GWh，占总产量49.3%，同比累计增长149.2%。\n随着三元材料电池产量快速增长，电池用镍需求日益旺盛。据上海有色网数据，上半年国内三元前驱体对镍需求量达到9.67万吨，同比增长153%。\n必和必拓首席商务官潘文怡（Vandita Pant）表示，据估计，电池制造对镍的需求在未来十年将增长五倍以上，主要用于支持世界日益增长的电动汽车市场需求。\n镍对特斯拉有多重要？特斯拉CEO马斯克此前曾多次表达对未来镍供应的担忧，他曾表态需要矿商生产更多的镍。\n当地时间今年2月25日，特斯拉CEO马斯克曾在社交媒体上表示，镍是特斯拉扩大锂电池产量的最大顾虑，并暗示“缺镍”导致特斯拉大规模运用磷酸铁锂电池路线。\n去年，马斯克还在二季度财报电话会议上对采矿业喊话：如果你们以环保的方式高效开采镍，特斯拉将给你们一份长期大合同。\n正如马斯克所暗示，由于对镍供给存在顾虑，特斯拉转而大规模运用磷酸铁锂电池。但至今磷酸铁锂能量密度低、里程短的问题仍没有有效解决。随着消费者对新能源汽车的高续航里程、轻量化的需求逐步提升，三元材料电池路线仍是无可替代的，这使镍资源保障问题日益受到这个行业的重视。\n而镍在电池中的主要作用在于提高能量密度，即电池所含的镍比例越高，电池所含电量也越高，反映到新能源汽车上就是续航能力越高。\n\n而从国际电池头部企业的动作来看，高镍三元电池路线将成为一大主流。\n2021年，宝马IX系列、大众ID系列、奔驰EQ系列等搭载高镍电池的新车型纷纷上市。在降成本和提升产品竞争力要求下，高镍三元路线日益获得业内认可，电池企业纷纷研发镍含量更高的下一代电池。\n中信期货认为，2025年全球新能源汽车市场三元材料电池占比将达到74%。根据未来三元材料高镍化的比例来估算，预计电池用镍需求量将达到27万吨，是2020年需求的将近4 倍。\n华泰期货认为，随着全球新能源汽车产量快速增长、三元电池高镍化进程推进，全球三元电池耗镍量持续攀升。2021年开始全球三元电池耗镍增量逐渐显著，对镍价逐步形成推动力量，成为镍消费格局改变的转折点。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2269,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":167902408,"gmtCreate":1624241300304,"gmtModify":1703831308026,"author":{"id":"3576195246415673","authorId":"3576195246415673","name":"Jefflau749","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3b16bea38b728770eeacee83d0ca1b56","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576195246415673","authorIdStr":"3576195246415673"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"?","listText":"?","text":"?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":6,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/167902408","repostId":"1139155384","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1139155384","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"提供IPO最新消息，及时更新市场动态，专家团队助力分析可投资项目价值，提供IPO项目咨询服务。","home_visible":1,"media_name":"独角兽早知道","id":"1023683695","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1147954ba5ed4a54ba9a061e9dd405e5"},"pubTimestamp":1624240718,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1139155384?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-21 09:58","market":"hk","language":"zh","title":"Uqhui passed the Hong Kong Stock Exchange hearing, with revenue exceeding HK$2.8 billion in 2020.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1139155384","media":"独角兽早知道","summary":"据港交所6月20日披露，品牌电子商务零售及批发解决方案提供商优趣汇已通过港交所上市聆讯，中金为独家保荐人。\n\n优趣汇是中国领先的品牌电子商务零售及批发解决方案提供商，战略性地专注于日本品牌快速消费品，","content":"<p>According to a disclosure by the Hong Kong Stock Exchange on June 20, U-Qhui, a provider of branded e-commerce retail and wholesale solutions, has passed the listing hearing of the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, with CICC as the sole sponsor.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b34695199c869a86dc6364bdfa98754\" tg-width=\"713\" tg-height=\"607\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Youqhui is a leading provider of branded e-commerce retail and wholesale solutions in China, strategically focusing on Japanese branded fast-moving consumer goods, including, among others, beauty products and personal care products.</p><p>According to a report by Frost & Sullivan, the company achieved a GMV of RMB 4 billion from overseas FMCG brand e-commerce services in 2019, with a market share of 1.2%, ranking tenth in China's overseas FMCG brand e-commerce service market.</p><p>According to the same source, based on the GMV of Japanese branded FMCG sold in China through e-commerce channels in 2019, Uqhui was the number one branded e-commerce solution provider in China with a market share of 5.5%, while the top five service providers in China collectively held a market share of 20% based on GMV in 2019.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9e8885cfa16fe76a48a44e4624c291b2\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"607\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>As Japanese FMCG brands have become increasingly popular and significant players in China's e-commerce business, the market size of e-commerce services for Japanese FMCG brands increased from RMB12.2 billion in 2014 to RMB73.3 billion in 2019, representing a CAGR of 43.1%. According to a report by CIC, it is expected to further grow by 12.6% to RMB 82.5 billion in 2020 and to RMB 111.4 billion in 2024, representing a compound annual growth rate of 8.7% from 2019 to 2024.</p><p>UQHUI's business model involves the company acting as a bridge between Chinese brand partners, e-commerce platforms, and customers, primarily conducting its business through distribution and service fees.</p><p>Under the distribution model, the Company purchases products from selected brand partners, manages the China and cross-border supply chain, identifies and reaches target customers through omnichannel marketing, and sells products to customers through online stores operated by the Company (which the Company refers to as a business-to-customer (B2C) model), or to e-commerce platforms or other distributors who sell products to customers (which the Company refers to as a business-to-business (B2B) model).</p><p>Under the service fee model, as a supplement to the B2C and B2B models, Unqhui also provides solutions to brand partners or other customers and charges service fees. The service fees are usually based on a pre-agreed amount and/or performance-based service fees, which the company refers to as providing services.</p><p>Leveraging UQHUI's extensive industry experience and strong brand analysis and data analysis capabilities, the company assists brand partners in designing operational and marketing strategies for the company's sales through multiple channels under the B2C and B2B models.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0153069158c634af87c7ebd57f17ac22\" tg-width=\"718\" tg-height=\"261\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>UQHui's revenue generated through general trading under the B2B model decreased from RMB1.014 billion in 2019 to RMB842 million in 2020, primarily due to the company ceasing to sell products under some brands in 2020. UQHui's revenue from its service provision business decreased from 2019 to 2020 because the company ceased providing online operation services to TCC in 2020.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1a24da482baa83f17aefd4f5982bf6f0\" tg-width=\"741\" tg-height=\"327\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>As two ways for overseas brands to enter China, general trade and cross-border import differ in terms of timing, cost, regulatory methods, and taxation.</p><p>For general trade, the products sold are stored domestically and the prices offered to end customers are generally higher as customs duties and taxes are generally higher compared to cross-border imports. For cross-border imports, goods are usually imported through bonded warehouses, import duties and taxes for some product categories are usually lower than those under general trade, and the registration and filing procedures are relatively simple.</p><p>As part of its cross-border e-commerce solutions, the company leverages the strengths of UQH Japan and UQH Hong Kong, and has accumulated knowledge and experience in handling customs regulations and policies related to China, Japan, and Hong Kong. Therefore, UQHUI is able to provide brand partners with the best strategies and solutions, taking into account factors such as the characteristics of their products and the regulatory requirements applicable to them.</p><p>In 2018, 2019 and 2020, total revenue derived from sales of Japanese brands accounted for 98.0%, 97.9% and 97.3% of total revenue, while revenue derived from provision of services to them accounted for 1.9%, 1.8% and 1.0% of total revenue, respectively.</p><p>In 2018, 2019 and 2020, sales of Japanese brands recorded 97.1%, 96.8% and 96.0% of the total gross profit, while services provided to them recorded 3.0%, 3.2% and 1.7% of the total gross profit, respectively. In 2018, 2019 and 2020, the gross profit margin of sales of Japanese brands was 24.0%, 28.6% and 31.3%, respectively, while the gross profit margin of revenue derived from services rendered to them was 38.7%, 53.6% and 56.7%, respectively.</p><p>The total revenue from the stores operated by UQHui on its major e-commerce platforms increased from RMB1,086 million in 2018 to RMB1,516 million in 2020, primarily due to the increase in revenue from the cross-border e-commerce stores operated by the Company on its major e-commerce platforms.</p><p>In 2019 and 2020, Uqhui saw a net increase of 15 and 9 stores operated on major e-commerce platforms for cross-border e-commerce, respectively. Revenue from general trading stores on major e-commerce platforms decreased from RMB640 million in 2018 to RMB590 million in 2019, primarily due to the company no longer providing services to a beauty product brand (which saw a significant increase in sales in 2018). Sales revenue in 2018 and 2019 was RMB134 million and RMB11.8 million, respectively, accounting for 5.3% and 0.4% of the company's total revenue for the same period.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Uqhui passed the Hong Kong Stock Exchange hearing, with revenue exceeding HK$2.8 billion in 2020.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUqhui passed the Hong Kong Stock Exchange hearing, with revenue exceeding HK$2.8 billion in 2020.\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1023683695\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/1147954ba5ed4a54ba9a061e9dd405e5);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">独角兽早知道 </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-06-21 09:58</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>According to a disclosure by the Hong Kong Stock Exchange on June 20, U-Qhui, a provider of branded e-commerce retail and wholesale solutions, has passed the listing hearing of the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, with CICC as the sole sponsor.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b34695199c869a86dc6364bdfa98754\" tg-width=\"713\" tg-height=\"607\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Youqhui is a leading provider of branded e-commerce retail and wholesale solutions in China, strategically focusing on Japanese branded fast-moving consumer goods, including, among others, beauty products and personal care products.</p><p>According to a report by Frost & Sullivan, the company achieved a GMV of RMB 4 billion from overseas FMCG brand e-commerce services in 2019, with a market share of 1.2%, ranking tenth in China's overseas FMCG brand e-commerce service market.</p><p>According to the same source, based on the GMV of Japanese branded FMCG sold in China through e-commerce channels in 2019, Uqhui was the number one branded e-commerce solution provider in China with a market share of 5.5%, while the top five service providers in China collectively held a market share of 20% based on GMV in 2019.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9e8885cfa16fe76a48a44e4624c291b2\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"607\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>As Japanese FMCG brands have become increasingly popular and significant players in China's e-commerce business, the market size of e-commerce services for Japanese FMCG brands increased from RMB12.2 billion in 2014 to RMB73.3 billion in 2019, representing a CAGR of 43.1%. According to a report by CIC, it is expected to further grow by 12.6% to RMB 82.5 billion in 2020 and to RMB 111.4 billion in 2024, representing a compound annual growth rate of 8.7% from 2019 to 2024.</p><p>UQHUI's business model involves the company acting as a bridge between Chinese brand partners, e-commerce platforms, and customers, primarily conducting its business through distribution and service fees.</p><p>Under the distribution model, the Company purchases products from selected brand partners, manages the China and cross-border supply chain, identifies and reaches target customers through omnichannel marketing, and sells products to customers through online stores operated by the Company (which the Company refers to as a business-to-customer (B2C) model), or to e-commerce platforms or other distributors who sell products to customers (which the Company refers to as a business-to-business (B2B) model).</p><p>Under the service fee model, as a supplement to the B2C and B2B models, Unqhui also provides solutions to brand partners or other customers and charges service fees. The service fees are usually based on a pre-agreed amount and/or performance-based service fees, which the company refers to as providing services.</p><p>Leveraging UQHUI's extensive industry experience and strong brand analysis and data analysis capabilities, the company assists brand partners in designing operational and marketing strategies for the company's sales through multiple channels under the B2C and B2B models.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0153069158c634af87c7ebd57f17ac22\" tg-width=\"718\" tg-height=\"261\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>UQHui's revenue generated through general trading under the B2B model decreased from RMB1.014 billion in 2019 to RMB842 million in 2020, primarily due to the company ceasing to sell products under some brands in 2020. UQHui's revenue from its service provision business decreased from 2019 to 2020 because the company ceased providing online operation services to TCC in 2020.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1a24da482baa83f17aefd4f5982bf6f0\" tg-width=\"741\" tg-height=\"327\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>As two ways for overseas brands to enter China, general trade and cross-border import differ in terms of timing, cost, regulatory methods, and taxation.</p><p>For general trade, the products sold are stored domestically and the prices offered to end customers are generally higher as customs duties and taxes are generally higher compared to cross-border imports. For cross-border imports, goods are usually imported through bonded warehouses, import duties and taxes for some product categories are usually lower than those under general trade, and the registration and filing procedures are relatively simple.</p><p>As part of its cross-border e-commerce solutions, the company leverages the strengths of UQH Japan and UQH Hong Kong, and has accumulated knowledge and experience in handling customs regulations and policies related to China, Japan, and Hong Kong. Therefore, UQHUI is able to provide brand partners with the best strategies and solutions, taking into account factors such as the characteristics of their products and the regulatory requirements applicable to them.</p><p>In 2018, 2019 and 2020, total revenue derived from sales of Japanese brands accounted for 98.0%, 97.9% and 97.3% of total revenue, while revenue derived from provision of services to them accounted for 1.9%, 1.8% and 1.0% of total revenue, respectively.</p><p>In 2018, 2019 and 2020, sales of Japanese brands recorded 97.1%, 96.8% and 96.0% of the total gross profit, while services provided to them recorded 3.0%, 3.2% and 1.7% of the total gross profit, respectively. In 2018, 2019 and 2020, the gross profit margin of sales of Japanese brands was 24.0%, 28.6% and 31.3%, respectively, while the gross profit margin of revenue derived from services rendered to them was 38.7%, 53.6% and 56.7%, respectively.</p><p>The total revenue from the stores operated by UQHui on its major e-commerce platforms increased from RMB1,086 million in 2018 to RMB1,516 million in 2020, primarily due to the increase in revenue from the cross-border e-commerce stores operated by the Company on its major e-commerce platforms.</p><p>In 2019 and 2020, Uqhui saw a net increase of 15 and 9 stores operated on major e-commerce platforms for cross-border e-commerce, respectively. Revenue from general trading stores on major e-commerce platforms decreased from RMB640 million in 2018 to RMB590 million in 2019, primarily due to the company no longer providing services to a beauty product brand (which saw a significant increase in sales in 2018). Sales revenue in 2018 and 2019 was RMB134 million and RMB11.8 million, respectively, accounting for 5.3% and 0.4% of the company's total revenue for the same period.</p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/26d35a88c8d9d9d46abd395d2bd24396","relate_stocks":{"02177":"优趣汇控股"},"is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1139155384","content_text":"据港交所6月20日披露，品牌电子商务零售及批发解决方案提供商优趣汇已通过港交所上市聆讯，中金为独家保荐人。\n\n优趣汇是中国领先的品牌电子商务零售及批发解决方案提供商，战略性地专注于日本品牌快速消费品，包括（其中包括）美妆产品及个人护理产品。\n根据灼识咨询报告，公司于2019年自海外快速消费品品牌电子商务服务获得GMV人民币40亿元，市场份额为1.2%，位列中国海外快速消费品品牌电子商务服务市场第十名。\n根据同一资料来源，按2019年通过电子商务渠道在中国出售的日本品牌快速消费品GMV计，优趣汇是中国排名第一的品牌电子商务解决方案提供商，市场份额为5.5%，而按2019年的GMV计，中国前五大服务提供商合共拥有20%的市场份额。\n\n由于日本快速消费品品牌已日益普及并成为中国电子商务业务的重要参与者，日本快速消费品品牌电子商务服务市场规模从2014年的人民币122亿元增至2019年的人民币733亿元，复合年增长率为43.1%。根据灼识咨询报告，预期于2020年进一步增长12.6%至人民币825亿元，于2024年进一步增长至人民币1,114亿元，2019年至2024年复合年增长率为8.7%。\n优趣汇的业务模式公司充当中国品牌合作伙伴、电子商务平台及客户之间的桥梁，主要通过分销方式及服务费方式经营公司的业务。\n在分销方式下，公司向选定的品牌合作伙伴购买产品，管理中国及跨境供应链，通过全渠道营销识别及接触目标客户，并通过公司所经营的网店向客户出售产品（公司称之为企业对客户(B2C)模式），或向电子商务平台或其他分销商出售产品，该等电子商务平台或分销商将产品售予客户（公司称之为企业对企业(B2B)模式）。\n在服务费方式下，作为对B2C及B2B模式的补充，优趣汇亦向品牌合作伙伴或其他客户提供解决方案，并收取服务费，服务费通常以预先约定的金额及╱或绩效服务费用为准，公司称之为提供服务业务。\n凭借优趣汇深厚的行业经验以及强大的品牌分析及数据分析能力，公司协助品牌合作伙伴通过B2C及B2B模式下的多个渠道设计公司销售的运营及营销策略。\n\n优趣汇通过一般贸易于B2B模式下产生的收入由2019年的人民币10.14亿元减少至2020年的人民币8.42亿元，乃主要由于公司在2020年不再销售一些品牌旗下的产品。优趣汇的提供服务业务所得收入于2019年至2020年有所减少，原因为公司于2020年停止为TCC提供在线运营服务。\n\n作为海外品牌进入中国的两种方式，一般贸易及跨境进口在时间、成本、监管方式及税收等方面不同。\n就一般贸易而言，所售产品存放于境内，由于关税及税收较跨境进口而言通常较高，故向终端客户提供的价格亦通常较高。就跨境进口而言，货物通常通过保税仓库进口，部分产品类别的进口关税及税收通常较一般贸易项下的关税及税收更低，且登记及备案程序亦相对轻简。\n作为跨境电子商务解决方案的一部分，公司利用日本优趣汇及优趣汇香港的优势，并在处理中国、日本及香港海关相关的法规及政策中积累知识及经验。因此，优趣汇能够为品牌合作伙伴提供最佳战略及解决方案，当中考虑其产品特性及适用于他们的监管要求等因素。\n于2018年、2019年及2020年，日本品牌销售所得的全部收入分别占总收入的98.0%、97.9%及97.3%，而向其提供服务所得收入分别占总收入的1.9%、1.8%及1.0%。\n于2018年、2019年及2020年，日本品牌销售分别录得总毛利的97.1%、96.8%及96.0%，而向其提供服务分别录得总毛利的3.0%、3.2%及1.7%。于2018年、2019年及2020年，日本品牌销售的毛利率分别为24.0%、28.6%及31.3%，而向其提供服务所得收入的毛利率分别为38.7%、53.6%及56.7%。\n优趣汇于主要电子商务平台上所运营店铺的总收入由2018年的人民币10.86亿元增加至2020年的人民币15.16亿元，乃主要由于公司于主要电子商务平台上所运营跨境电子商务店铺的收入增加。\n于2019年及2020年，优趣汇就跨境电子商务于主要电子商务平台上所运营的店铺分别净增加15间及9间，于主要电子商务平台自一般贸易店铺录得的收入自2018年的人民币6.4亿元减少至2019年的人民币5.9亿元，乃主要由于公司不再向一个美妆产品品牌品牌（于2018年的销售额大幅增长）提供服务，于2018年及2019年的销售收入分别为人民币1.34亿元及人民币1180万元，占公司同期总收入的5.3%及0.4%。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"02177":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2528,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":160628852,"gmtCreate":1623796738576,"gmtModify":1703819463780,"author":{"id":"3576195246415673","authorId":"3576195246415673","name":"Jefflau749","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3b16bea38b728770eeacee83d0ca1b56","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576195246415673","authorIdStr":"3576195246415673"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"?","listText":"?","text":"?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/160628852","repostId":"1134804844","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1134804844","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1623770805,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1134804844?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-15 23:26","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Morgan Stanley predicts that inflation expectations may have peaked. With shrinking balance sheet approaching, how should one invest?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1134804844","media":"第一财经","summary":"年初从成长到周期的轮动速度开始放缓，机构认为这一时期更应该均衡配置。\n\n为何美国通胀数据创下13年新高仍未动摇投资者情绪？美债收益率为何不涨反跌？紧缩周期临近应该怎么投？这些都是盘桓在近期投资者心中的","content":"<p><div>At the beginning of the year, the rotation from growth to cycle began to slow down, and institutions believe that a more balanced allocation is necessary during this period. Why did US inflation data hit a 13-year high but still not shake investor sentiment? Why did US Treasury yields fall instead of rising? How should one invest as a tightening cycle approaches? These are all huge questions that have been lingering in the minds of investors recently. Morgan Stanley recently stated that economic growth and inflation are expected to remain quite strong next year. However, the first quarter of this year experienced exceptionally strong demand, which may indicate that the rate of growth and inflation has peaked. The US market seems to agree with this, causing bond yields to peak and then fall...</p><p><a href=\"https://www.yicai.com/news/101082673.html\">Web page link</a></div></p>","source":"dyvj","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Morgan Stanley predicts that inflation expectations may have peaked. With shrinking balance sheet approaching, how should one invest?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nMorgan Stanley predicts that inflation expectations may have peaked. With shrinking balance sheet approaching, how should one invest?\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">第一财经</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-06-15 23:26</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><div>At the beginning of the year, the rotation from growth to cycle began to slow down, and institutions believe that a more balanced allocation is necessary during this period. Why did US inflation data hit a 13-year high but still not shake investor sentiment? Why did US Treasury yields fall instead of rising? How should one invest as a tightening cycle approaches? These are all huge questions that have been lingering in the minds of investors recently. Morgan Stanley recently stated that economic growth and inflation are expected to remain quite strong next year. However, the first quarter of this year experienced exceptionally strong demand, which may indicate that the rate of growth and inflation has peaked. The US market seems to agree with this, causing bond yields to peak and then fall...</p><p><a href=\"https://www.yicai.com/news/101082673.html\">Web page link</a></div></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"https://www.yicai.com/news/101082673.html\">第一财经</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c318bcd91a109139b7d70c76c30bb154","relate_stocks":{"MS":"摩根士丹利"},"source_url":"https://www.yicai.com/news/101082673.html","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1134804844","content_text":"年初从成长到周期的轮动速度开始放缓，机构认为这一时期更应该均衡配置。\n\n为何美国通胀数据创下13年新高仍未动摇投资者情绪？美债收益率为何不涨反跌？紧缩周期临近应该怎么投？这些都是盘桓在近期投资者心中的巨大疑问。\n摩根士丹利最新表示，明年经济增长和通胀预计仍将相当强劲。然而，今年第一季度经历了异常旺盛的需求，可能标志着增长和通胀的上升速率已达峰值。美国市场似乎也认同这一点，债券收益率因此触顶回落，一些周期性较强的股票也出现盘整。在一季度盈利大幅上修后，大摩现在认为未来继续上修的空间有限，毕竟一季度发生的一些事情未来不太会重复——经济重启叠加巨大的财政刺激带动了消费，加密市场泡沫也强化了财富效应。\n市场预计，本周举行的美联储议息会议将开始讨论缩减买债规模的问题。随着紧缩周期不断临近，投资策略也不同于早周期，盈利增速将成主要驱动力。年初从成长到周期的轮动速度开始放缓，机构认为这一时期更应该均衡配置。\n通胀预期可能触顶\n数据显示，美国5月整体CPI同比大涨5%，超过预期的4.7%，增速创2008年8月以来最高；剔除不稳定的食品与能源价格的核心CPI年率达3.8%，同样超过市场预期的3.5%，增速创1992年以来新高。\n\n美国整体通胀率。来源：Wind，美国劳工部\n然而，在6月10日上述数据发布后，10年期美债收益率不涨反跌，收盘仅报1.454%。美股也照涨不误，标普500指数上周五收于4247.44点，距离突破历史新高的4249.74点仅一步之遥。\n大摩认为，这背后的原因可能在于，通胀预期或已经近乎见顶。\n摩根士丹利首席美股策略师威尔逊（Michael J Wilson）对记者表示，通胀保值债券（TIPS）市场此前已变得非常拥挤，特别是在零售市场，因此无论通胀数据结果如何，回调的时机已经成熟；盈亏平衡通胀率已经反映了市场对通胀的乐观预期，达到10年高点；此外，企业和消费者调查都表明，他们对通胀的预期发生了变化，认为通胀是更持续性的而非间歇性的，这一点很重要，因为预期可以导致行为变化。\n“尽管所有这些指标都大幅走高，但它们似乎也已见顶，10年期国债名义收益率和盈亏平衡收益率已触顶回落。这可能是一个早期信号，表明后续经济增长和通胀都可能不及目前过高的预期。”威尔逊称。\n影响这一预期的关键仍和需求水平有关。一季度高达1.9万亿美元的财政刺激拉动了消费，叠加加密货币扩张又带来了近1万亿美元的财富效应。但机构认为，这两种情况都不太可能在二、三季度重演，这也会逐步体现在经济增速和通胀数据上。\n从名义利率拆解来看，2月中旬之前，美债收益率快速攀升主要受通胀预期回升驱动。疫情后美国经济加速复苏，叠加拜登政府推岀的一轮轮大规模财政刺激，通胀预期不断升温，彼时实际利率受疫情反复等因素的影响持续磨底。\n在突破1.3%后，通胀预期趋于缓和，实际利率替代通胀预期成为推动美债收益率快速上行的核心因素，这也意味着彼时市场的关注点更多落在经济数据的改善上。近期美债收益率的下行，更多则源于通胀预期和实际利率的同步走弱。隐含通胀预期从5月峰值下降近19BP，与CPI连续两个月的大幅上涨形成了鲜明对比。显然，美联储官员以及美国财长耶伦关于“通胀上升是暂时的”的说法终于让市场开始买账了，投资者开始相信，供给短缺造成的涨价将会缓解，且服务性需求的攀升也不可能一直持续下去。\n\n另一些因素可能也在推动收益率下行。景顺首席全球市场策略师Kristina Hooper对记者表示，债市正在对某些国家的新冠肺炎疫情未能受控的担忧做出反应，尤其是在更令人担忧的Delta变异病毒株迅速传播的情况下，这可能会抑制经济增长。Delta变异病毒株占英国新病例的90%，并且很可能成为美国的主要毒株；此外，美国以外的投资者仍被美国国债所吸引，特别是考虑到欧元区的利率非常低。上周的一个催化剂是美元走软，这刺激了外国购买美国政府债券。\n紧缩周期前夕应均衡配置\n不过，通胀预期触顶并不代表通胀会很快下行，更不代表全球央行尤其是美联储永远不“收水”。\nKristina Hooper预计，本周举行的美联储议息会议将开始讨论缩减买债规模的问题，可能会在夏末的杰克逊·霍尔会议（Jackson Hole）上宣布缩表时间点，并于秋季开始实行。但市场可能还没有准备好接受这个消息，预计美债收益率可能在下半年上升。\n历史数据也显示，即使在经济增长动能见顶放缓、流动性边际收紧的时期，股市表现仍可能保持良好，盈利增长是驱动股价攀升的关键。当然回报往往会弱于经济强劲增长的时期。在行业配置上，比起在上一个阶段侧重于顺周期板块的配置，在当前的中周期，行业配置就需要在长期可持续成长和顺周期板块中求取平衡。\n年初以来，从成长到价值的板块轮动加速。但事实上，5月以来，早周期板块相较于标普500的表现已明显触顶回落，这也和美债收益率触顶回落的时间点吻合。\n\n大摩认为，在成长（growth）和价值/周期性行业（value）之间，后疫情时代的每股收益驱动因素将更加均衡，消费者服务、运输、能源和资本物品等板块预计将成为价值/周期板块的重要增长驱动力，这和过去两年有较大不同，当时每股收益增长主要集中在科技和通信服务。\n未来，更高的利润率预期主要是由科技、互联网和制药行业推动的。就不同板块对整体营业利润的贡献来看，科技公司仍占主导。具体而言，传媒和娱乐行业(以谷歌和脸书主导）的利润增长几乎占预期利润增长的四分之一，软件/服务占17%，零售服务占16%（其中亚马逊一家公司就贡献了近三分之二），半导体占12%，科技硬件占10%，制药占11%。\n之所以这一时期要均衡配置，也是因为从绝对角度看，大摩认为预期利润率涨幅最大的是科技股和一些周期性行业，部分周期性行业在经历了上半年的大涨后，后续行情仍有望延续，包括汽车、耐用消费品/服装、多元金融(资管公司、投行、经纪公司)、能源和材料等。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"MS":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1853,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":188231743,"gmtCreate":1623445594882,"gmtModify":1704203800733,"author":{"id":"3576195246415673","authorId":"3576195246415673","name":"Jefflau749","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3b16bea38b728770eeacee83d0ca1b56","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576195246415673","authorIdStr":"3576195246415673"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"WOW","listText":"WOW","text":"WOW","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/188231743","repostId":"1156959915","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1156959915","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"为用户提供金融资讯、行情、数据，旨在帮助投资者理解世界，做投资决策。","home_visible":1,"media_name":"老虎资讯综合","id":"102","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1623429803,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1156959915?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-12 00:43","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Tiger Brokers helped BOSS Zhipin list on Nasdaq, which opened 75% higher on its first day of trading.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1156959915","media":"老虎资讯综合","summary":"北京时间6月12日，BOSS直聘登陆纳斯达克，首日开涨75%。\n老虎证券作为互联网承销商，与高盛、摩根士丹利、UBS、华兴、海通等国际知名大行同列BOSS直聘招股书封面，展现出老虎证券作为头部互联网科","content":"<p>On June 12, Beijing time, BOSS Zhipin listed on Nasdaq, rising 75% on its first day.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/57551fd25362c75885fbb928efe43f8a\"></p><p>As an internet underwriter, Tiger Brokers was featured on the cover of BOSS Zhipin's prospectus alongside internationally renowned banks such as Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, UBS, China Renaissance, and Haitong, demonstrating Tiger Brokers' influence as a leading internet technology investment bank.<br></p><p><br></p><p>According to the latest prospectus, BOSS Zhipin will publicly issue 48 million American Depositary Shares (ADSs) at a price of $19 per share, raising approximately $912 million, with a total market capitalization of $7.599 billion at the opening.</p><p>This valuation has surpassed the combined valuation of 51job, which is publicly valued at $5 billion, and Zhaopin.com, which is only valued at $1.7 billion in the private equity market due to delisting, making it the most valuable Chinese recruitment platform.</p><p>Of course, achieving such a high valuation indicates, to some extent, that BOSS Zhipin has also gained recognition from the capital market for its financial performance.</p><p><b>Financial Performance</b></p><p>BOSS Zhipin's recent financial performance can be summarized as follows: strong revenue growth momentum; Gross profit grew strongly, and the gross profit margin remained stable; Although operating profit is low, it has already achieved a turnaround from loss to profit; Operating cash flow surged.</p><p>Specifically, BOSS Zhipin's revenue reached $298 million in 2020, a surge of 95.4% compared to $152 million in 2019. In the first quarter of 2021, the company's revenue reached $120 million, a year-on-year increase of 178.9%.</p><p>BOSS Zhipin's gross profit was $261 million in 2020, a 98.7% increase from $131 million in 2019, while it reached $104 million in the first quarter of 2021, a year-on-year increase of 178.4%. Meanwhile, the company's gross profit margins remained almost unchanged at 86.20%, 87.65% and 86.45% in 2019, 2020 and the first quarter of 2021, respectively.</p><p>In 2019, 2020, and the first quarter of 2021, BOSS Zhipin achieved operating profits of US$392,800, US$1,356,000, and US$350,000 and US$400,000, respectively, with operating profit margins of 0.3%, 0.5%, and 0.3%. During the same period, the company reported net losses of US$112 million, US$188 million and US$40.972 million, respectively.</p><p>In 2019, 2020, and the first quarter of 2021, BOSS Zhipin's operating cash flow was -$16.1318 million, $60.676 million, and $25.235 million, respectively.</p><p>As of March 31, 2021, BOSS Zhipin held $626 million in cash and $332 million in liabilities. During the twelve months ended March 31, 2021, the company had free cash flow of US$102 million.</p><p><b>Research Analysis</b></p><p>BOSS Zhipin hopes to gain support from the US capital market to help them continue their expansion in the Chinese market.</p><p>Judging from the company's financial performance, their revenue and gross profit margin have grown rapidly, and they have achieved a turnaround from loss to profit at the operational level. The free cash flow as of March 31, 2021, exceeded $101 million, which is impressive.</p><p>In China, the market for providing online recruitment services for job seekers and employers is huge and has a promising future.</p><p>Goldman Sachs is the lead underwriter for this transaction. Over the past twelve months, the company has led the underwriting of IPO shares with an average return of 42.9%, which is in the middle range compared to the performance of all major underwriters during the same period.</p><p>The number one risk facing BOSS Zhipin is that the company may face a series of competitive pressures, such as talent networks or other mainstream international recruitment companies entering their markets. Once these become a reality, they will threaten their growth prospects or force them to significantly increase marketing spending, suppressing profitability.</p><p>China's various high-margin online businesses often eventually attract a large number of competitors, and the main means of competition is price wars, which is obviously not good news for the future returns of stocks.</p><p>From a valuation perspective, the price BOSS Zhipin offered to US IPO investors implies a company value-to-revenue ratio of around 19.2. Although this figure is higher than the current overall level of software-as-a-service stocks, BOSS Zhipin's revenue growth momentum is stronger. They have already crossed the profitability threshold at the operational level and generated considerable free cash flow.</p><p>Therefore, although BOSS Zhipin's IPO price is not cheap, it is still worth paying attention to for investors interested in the growth prospects of China's online recruitment market.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/361ada34c84eeaafbb2e860b6eb0db6f\"></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tiger Brokers helped BOSS Zhipin list on Nasdaq, which opened 75% higher on its first day of trading.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTiger Brokers helped BOSS Zhipin list on Nasdaq, which opened 75% higher on its first day of trading.\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/102\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">老虎资讯综合 </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-06-12 00:43</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>On June 12, Beijing time, BOSS Zhipin listed on Nasdaq, rising 75% on its first day.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/57551fd25362c75885fbb928efe43f8a\"></p><p>As an internet underwriter, Tiger Brokers was featured on the cover of BOSS Zhipin's prospectus alongside internationally renowned banks such as Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, UBS, China Renaissance, and Haitong, demonstrating Tiger Brokers' influence as a leading internet technology investment bank.<br></p><p><br></p><p>According to the latest prospectus, BOSS Zhipin will publicly issue 48 million American Depositary Shares (ADSs) at a price of $19 per share, raising approximately $912 million, with a total market capitalization of $7.599 billion at the opening.</p><p>This valuation has surpassed the combined valuation of 51job, which is publicly valued at $5 billion, and Zhaopin.com, which is only valued at $1.7 billion in the private equity market due to delisting, making it the most valuable Chinese recruitment platform.</p><p>Of course, achieving such a high valuation indicates, to some extent, that BOSS Zhipin has also gained recognition from the capital market for its financial performance.</p><p><b>Financial Performance</b></p><p>BOSS Zhipin's recent financial performance can be summarized as follows: strong revenue growth momentum; Gross profit grew strongly, and the gross profit margin remained stable; Although operating profit is low, it has already achieved a turnaround from loss to profit; Operating cash flow surged.</p><p>Specifically, BOSS Zhipin's revenue reached $298 million in 2020, a surge of 95.4% compared to $152 million in 2019. In the first quarter of 2021, the company's revenue reached $120 million, a year-on-year increase of 178.9%.</p><p>BOSS Zhipin's gross profit was $261 million in 2020, a 98.7% increase from $131 million in 2019, while it reached $104 million in the first quarter of 2021, a year-on-year increase of 178.4%. Meanwhile, the company's gross profit margins remained almost unchanged at 86.20%, 87.65% and 86.45% in 2019, 2020 and the first quarter of 2021, respectively.</p><p>In 2019, 2020, and the first quarter of 2021, BOSS Zhipin achieved operating profits of US$392,800, US$1,356,000, and US$350,000 and US$400,000, respectively, with operating profit margins of 0.3%, 0.5%, and 0.3%. During the same period, the company reported net losses of US$112 million, US$188 million and US$40.972 million, respectively.</p><p>In 2019, 2020, and the first quarter of 2021, BOSS Zhipin's operating cash flow was -$16.1318 million, $60.676 million, and $25.235 million, respectively.</p><p>As of March 31, 2021, BOSS Zhipin held $626 million in cash and $332 million in liabilities. During the twelve months ended March 31, 2021, the company had free cash flow of US$102 million.</p><p><b>Research Analysis</b></p><p>BOSS Zhipin hopes to gain support from the US capital market to help them continue their expansion in the Chinese market.</p><p>Judging from the company's financial performance, their revenue and gross profit margin have grown rapidly, and they have achieved a turnaround from loss to profit at the operational level. The free cash flow as of March 31, 2021, exceeded $101 million, which is impressive.</p><p>In China, the market for providing online recruitment services for job seekers and employers is huge and has a promising future.</p><p>Goldman Sachs is the lead underwriter for this transaction. Over the past twelve months, the company has led the underwriting of IPO shares with an average return of 42.9%, which is in the middle range compared to the performance of all major underwriters during the same period.</p><p>The number one risk facing BOSS Zhipin is that the company may face a series of competitive pressures, such as talent networks or other mainstream international recruitment companies entering their markets. Once these become a reality, they will threaten their growth prospects or force them to significantly increase marketing spending, suppressing profitability.</p><p>China's various high-margin online businesses often eventually attract a large number of competitors, and the main means of competition is price wars, which is obviously not good news for the future returns of stocks.</p><p>From a valuation perspective, the price BOSS Zhipin offered to US IPO investors implies a company value-to-revenue ratio of around 19.2. Although this figure is higher than the current overall level of software-as-a-service stocks, BOSS Zhipin's revenue growth momentum is stronger. They have already crossed the profitability threshold at the operational level and generated considerable free cash flow.</p><p>Therefore, although BOSS Zhipin's IPO price is not cheap, it is still worth paying attention to for investors interested in the growth prospects of China's online recruitment market.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/361ada34c84eeaafbb2e860b6eb0db6f\"></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3aee31599ee7010691cc73f0ff8ac182","relate_stocks":{"BZ":"BOSS直聘"},"is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1156959915","content_text":"北京时间6月12日，BOSS直聘登陆纳斯达克，首日开涨75%。\n老虎证券作为互联网承销商，与高盛、摩根士丹利、UBS、华兴、海通等国际知名大行同列BOSS直聘招股书封面，展现出老虎证券作为头部互联网科技投行的影响力。\n\n根据最新招股书信息显示，BOSS直聘将公开发行4800万股美国存托股份（ADS），发行价定为每股19美元，募资约9.12亿美元，总市值开盘时是75.99亿美元。\n而这个估值已经超过公开估值50亿美元的前程无忧和由于退市只能在私募基金市场有估值17亿美元的智联招聘之和，成为估值最高的中国招聘平台。\n当然，能达到如此高额的估值，在一定程度上表明BOSS直聘也有着自己的在财务上的表现得到了资本市场的认可。\n财务表现\nBOSS直聘近期的财务表现大约可以做如下概括：营收增长势头强劲；毛利润增长强劲，毛利润率保持稳定；运营利润虽然低，但是已经实现了扭亏为盈；运营现金流猛增。\n具体而言，BOSS直聘2020年营收达到了2.98亿美元，较之2019年的1.52亿美元猛增95.4%之多，而2021年第一季度，公司营收就达到了1.20亿美元，同比增幅更高达178.9%。\nBOSS直聘毛利润2020年为2.61亿美元，较之2019年的1.31亿美元增长98.7%，而2021年第一季度达到1.04亿美元，同比增幅高达178.4%。与此同时，在2019年、2020年和2021年第一季度当中，公司毛利润率分别为86.20%、87.65%和86.45%，几乎保持不变。\n2019年、2020年和2021年第一季度，BOSS直聘分别实现运营利润39.28万美元、135.60万美元和35、40万美元，运营利润率分别为0.3%、0.5%和0.3%。同期内，公司净亏损分别为1.12亿美元、1.88亿美元和4097.20万美元。\n2019年、2020年和2021年第一季度，BOSS直聘运营现金流分别为-1613.18万美元、6067.60万美元和2523.50万美元。\n截至2021年3月31日，BOSS直聘持有现金6.26亿美元，负债3.32亿美元。截至2021年3月31日的十二个月内，公司自由现金流为1.02亿美元。\n研究分析\nBOSS直聘希望获得美国资本市场的支持，帮助他们在中国市场上继续扩张。\n从公司的财务表现看，他们营收和毛利润率增长迅猛，运营层面已经实现扭亏为盈。截至2021年3月31日的自由现金流超过1.01亿美元，令人印象深刻。\n在中国，为求职者和雇主提供线上招聘服务，市场体量是很巨大的，前景是很可观的。\n高盛是本次交易的领衔承销商，在过去十二个月时间内，该公司领衔承销的IPO股票，平均回报率为42.9%，在所有主要承销商同期业绩的比较当中位于中游水平。\nBOSS直聘面前的头号风险是，该公司可能会面对一系列竞争压力，比如人才网络，或者其他主流国际招聘公司进入他们所在的市场，而这些一旦成为现实，就将威胁到他们的增长前景，或者是迫使他们大幅提升营销支出，打压盈利能力。\n中国各种利润率较高的线上业务，往往最终都会吸引大量竞争者，而最主要的竞争手段就是大打价格战，而这对于股票未来的回报显然不是什么好消息。\n从估值角度看，BOSS直聘为美国IPO投资者开出的价格意味着公司企业价值营收比率为19.2左右，虽然这一数字高于软件即服务股票当前的总体水平，但是BOSS直聘的营收增长势头更为强劲，他们已经在运营层面越过盈利门槛，并且产生了可观的自由现金流。\n因此，虽然BOSS直聘IPO价格称不上低廉，但是对于那些有意于中国线上招聘市场成长前景的投资者而言，这一股票还是值得关注的。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"BZ":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1927,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":152191144,"gmtCreate":1625274221188,"gmtModify":1703739708929,"author":{"id":"3576195246415673","authorId":"3576195246415673","name":"Jefflau749","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3b16bea38b728770eeacee83d0ca1b56","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576195246415673","authorIdStr":"3576195246415673"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"yo","listText":"yo","text":"yo","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/152191144","repostId":"2148801442","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2148801442","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1625272059,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2148801442?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-03 08:27","market":"fut","language":"zh","title":"The Federal Reserve revealed that Powell had a \"private chat\" with the Coinbase CEO in May.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2148801442","media":"华尔街见闻","summary":"今年5月比特币等加密货币的大跌可能吸引了美联储领导者的注意。\n美联储本周五公布的纪录显示，联储主席鲍威尔曾在5月11日和美国最大加密货币交易所Coinbase的CEO Brian Armstrong会","content":"<p>The sharp drop in cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin in May of this year may have caught the attention of Federal Reserve leaders.</p><p>Records released by the Federal Reserve this Friday show that Fed Chairman Jerome Powell met with Brian Armstrong, CEO of Coinbase, the largest cryptocurrency exchange in the United States, on May 11, and the meeting lasted 30 minutes. A day later, on the 12th, Powell met again with Christopher Giancarlo, chairman of the CFTC, a former regulator who actively promotes the central bank's digital currency, the digital dollar, for 30 minutes.</p><p>Although the Federal Reserve did not disclose the specifics of Powell's meetings with Armstrong and Giancarlo, and spokespeople for both the Fed and Coinbase declined to comment on the May meetings, Wall Street Insights noted that in the Fed's records, Powell only met with the CEOs of two companies in May: Armstrong and a Wall Street giant.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JPM\">JPMorgan Chase</a>CEO Dimon. Also in May, media reported last year that Federal Reserve Governor Brainard, who was expected to succeed Powell as Federal Reserve Chairman after the Biden administration took office, endorsed central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) in a public speech.</p><p>Brainard stated that month that central bank-backed cryptocurrencies could offer a variety of benefits, reducing counterparty risks, as well as risks to consumer protection and financial stability, while privately issued cryptocurrencies pose multiple risks such as money laundering, threatening consumer protection or creating widespread financial stability risks.</p><p>Coincidentally, in May, when Powell had a \"private chat\" with Armstrong, several cryptocurrencies experienced double-digit drops.</p><p>The Wall Street Insights article mentioned that on May 13, the day after the Powell talks, [the following text appears to be unrelated and possibly machine-generated].<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla</a>The suspension of car payments in Bitcoin and the investigation into Binance, the world's largest cryptocurrency exchange, by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and the Department of Justice have hit several major cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin, with some falling by more than 10%, and some by nearly 20%. On May 19, a week after Powell's meeting, several cryptocurrencies fell by more than 20% due to Tesla CEO Elon Musk's suspected hint that Tesla would sell its Bitcoin holdings, coupled with China's frequent signals of strengthened regulation. Bitcoin fell by more than $13,000 at one point during trading, nearly breaking the $30,000 mark.</p><p>The Wall Street Insights article also mentioned that by the end of May, Bitcoin had fallen by 37%, the largest monthly drop since 2011. Even Ethereum, which has the smallest monthly decline among mainstream cryptocurrencies, saw a drop of more than 9%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/135b17f50ce3dce1e12479ca9e7b97ad\" tg-width=\"972\" tg-height=\"518\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>","source":"wallstreetcn_api","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The Federal Reserve revealed that Powell had a \"private chat\" with the Coinbase CEO in May.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe Federal Reserve revealed that Powell had a \"private chat\" with the Coinbase CEO in May.\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">华尔街见闻</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-03 08:27</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>The sharp drop in cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin in May of this year may have caught the attention of Federal Reserve leaders.</p><p>Records released by the Federal Reserve this Friday show that Fed Chairman Jerome Powell met with Brian Armstrong, CEO of Coinbase, the largest cryptocurrency exchange in the United States, on May 11, and the meeting lasted 30 minutes. A day later, on the 12th, Powell met again with Christopher Giancarlo, chairman of the CFTC, a former regulator who actively promotes the central bank's digital currency, the digital dollar, for 30 minutes.</p><p>Although the Federal Reserve did not disclose the specifics of Powell's meetings with Armstrong and Giancarlo, and spokespeople for both the Fed and Coinbase declined to comment on the May meetings, Wall Street Insights noted that in the Fed's records, Powell only met with the CEOs of two companies in May: Armstrong and a Wall Street giant.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JPM\">JPMorgan Chase</a>CEO Dimon. Also in May, media reported last year that Federal Reserve Governor Brainard, who was expected to succeed Powell as Federal Reserve Chairman after the Biden administration took office, endorsed central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) in a public speech.</p><p>Brainard stated that month that central bank-backed cryptocurrencies could offer a variety of benefits, reducing counterparty risks, as well as risks to consumer protection and financial stability, while privately issued cryptocurrencies pose multiple risks such as money laundering, threatening consumer protection or creating widespread financial stability risks.</p><p>Coincidentally, in May, when Powell had a \"private chat\" with Armstrong, several cryptocurrencies experienced double-digit drops.</p><p>The Wall Street Insights article mentioned that on May 13, the day after the Powell talks, [the following text appears to be unrelated and possibly machine-generated].<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla</a>The suspension of car payments in Bitcoin and the investigation into Binance, the world's largest cryptocurrency exchange, by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and the Department of Justice have hit several major cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin, with some falling by more than 10%, and some by nearly 20%. On May 19, a week after Powell's meeting, several cryptocurrencies fell by more than 20% due to Tesla CEO Elon Musk's suspected hint that Tesla would sell its Bitcoin holdings, coupled with China's frequent signals of strengthened regulation. Bitcoin fell by more than $13,000 at one point during trading, nearly breaking the $30,000 mark.</p><p>The Wall Street Insights article also mentioned that by the end of May, Bitcoin had fallen by 37%, the largest monthly drop since 2011. Even Ethereum, which has the smallest monthly decline among mainstream cryptocurrencies, saw a drop of more than 9%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/135b17f50ce3dce1e12479ca9e7b97ad\" tg-width=\"972\" tg-height=\"518\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3634483\">华尔街见闻</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/62dafa537afba542bdc43da1b85df8b4","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯","GBTC":"比特币ETF-Grayscale"},"source_url":"https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3634483","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2148801442","content_text":"今年5月比特币等加密货币的大跌可能吸引了美联储领导者的注意。\n美联储本周五公布的纪录显示，联储主席鲍威尔曾在5月11日和美国最大加密货币交易所Coinbase的CEO Brian Armstrong会谈，会晤持续了30分钟。一天后，12日鲍威尔又和积极宣传央行数字货币数字美元的前监管方CFTC主席Christopher Giancarlo会晤，时长也是30分钟。\n虽然美联储未透露鲍威尔同Armstrong和Giancarlo会谈的具体内容，联储和Coinbase的发言人都拒绝就5月的会谈置评，但华尔街见闻注意到，在美联储公布的纪录里，5月鲍威尔只和两名企业的CEO有过会谈，除了Armstrong，另一位是华尔街巨头摩根大通的CEO戴蒙。也是在5月，去年媒体称拜登政府上台后有望接替鲍威尔任美联储主席的联储理事Brainard在公开讲话中为央行数字货币（CBDC）站台。\nBrainard当月称，央行支持的加密货币可能提供多种多样的益处，将减少对手方风险，以及消费者保护和金融稳定的风险，而私人发行的加密货币存在洗钱等多种风险，威胁消费者保护，或者制造大范围的金融稳定风险。\n巧的是，就在鲍威尔同Armstrong“私聊”的5月，多只加密货币都曾遭遇两位数大跌。\n华尔街见闻文章提到，在鲍威尔会谈次日，即5月13日，受特斯拉叫停比特币付款买车和全球最大数币交易所币安遭美国国税局和司法部调查的消息打击，比特币等多只主流加密货币均跌超10%，部分跌近20%；在鲍威尔会谈一周后的5月19日，因特斯拉CEO马斯克疑似暗示特斯拉将抛售所持比特币，加之中国频出加强监管信号，当天多只加密货币跌超20%，比特币盘中一度跌超1.3万美元，险破3万美元关口。\n华尔街见闻文章还提到，到5月末，全月比特币累跌37%，创2011年来最大月跌幅，即使是主流加密货币中月度跌幅相对最小的以太坊，也有9%以上的跌幅。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,"GBTC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1739,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":123421336,"gmtCreate":1624435606025,"gmtModify":1703836599567,"author":{"id":"3576195246415673","authorId":"3576195246415673","name":"Jefflau749","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3b16bea38b728770eeacee83d0ca1b56","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576195246415673","authorIdStr":"3576195246415673"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"?","listText":"?","text":"?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/123421336","repostId":"1136367931","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1136367931","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1624434750,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1136367931?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-23 15:52","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Foxconn responds to new iPhone mass production as early as the end of August: No comment.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1136367931","media":"中国证券报","summary":"6月23日，有媒体报道称，新iPhone预估最快8月底量产，下半年新机备货量估计8500万部至9000万部。6月23日下午，中国证券报记者向苹果iPhone代工厂富士康求证。富士康方面回应称：“不针对","content":"<p><div>On June 23, media reports indicated that the new iPhone is expected to enter mass production as early as the end of August, with an estimated 85 million to 90 million units in stock in the second half of the year. On the afternoon of June 23, a reporter from the China Securities Journal contacted Foxconn, Apple's iPhone contract manufacturer, for verification. Foxconn responded, \"We do not comment on any customers or products.\"</p><p><a href=\"https://finance.sina.com.cn/tech/2021-06-23/doc-ikqcfnca2754610.shtml\">Web page link</a></div></p>","source":"zgzqb","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Foxconn responds to new iPhone mass production as early as the end of August: No comment.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFoxconn responds to new iPhone mass production as early as the end of August: No comment.\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">中国证券报</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-06-23 15:52</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><div>On June 23, media reports indicated that the new iPhone is expected to enter mass production as early as the end of August, with an estimated 85 million to 90 million units in stock in the second half of the year. On the afternoon of June 23, a reporter from the China Securities Journal contacted Foxconn, Apple's iPhone contract manufacturer, for verification. Foxconn responded, \"We do not comment on any customers or products.\"</p><p><a href=\"https://finance.sina.com.cn/tech/2021-06-23/doc-ikqcfnca2754610.shtml\">Web page link</a></div></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"https://finance.sina.com.cn/tech/2021-06-23/doc-ikqcfnca2754610.shtml\">中国证券报</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f4e63a1aa601544badaafd05ced9e865","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://finance.sina.com.cn/tech/2021-06-23/doc-ikqcfnca2754610.shtml","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1136367931","content_text":"6月23日，有媒体报道称，新iPhone预估最快8月底量产，下半年新机备货量估计8500万部至9000万部。6月23日下午，中国证券报记者向苹果iPhone代工厂富士康求证。富士康方面回应称：“不针对任何客户及产品发表评论。”","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AAPL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1847,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":137776399,"gmtCreate":1622413434111,"gmtModify":1704183832414,"author":{"id":"3576195246415673","authorId":"3576195246415673","name":"Jefflau749","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3b16bea38b728770eeacee83d0ca1b56","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576195246415673","authorIdStr":"3576195246415673"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"?","listText":"?","text":"?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/137776399","repostId":"1182234546","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1182234546","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"追踪全球财经热点，精选影响您财富的资讯，投资理财必备神器！","home_visible":1,"media_name":"华尔街见闻","id":"1084101182","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/66809d1f5c2e43e2bdf15820c6d6897e"},"pubTimestamp":1622373655,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1182234546?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-30 19:20","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"What does a weak start and a continuously weakening dollar mean for US stocks?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1182234546","media":"华尔街见闻","summary":"今年4月以来，美元指数持续走弱，截至目前已经接近2014年以来的最低水平。有分析认为，如果美元指数跌破90关口，并在2021年下半年持续向80这一关口趋近，那么将对美股产生重大影响。\n\n今年4月以来，","content":"<p>Since April of this year, the US Dollar Index has continued to weaken and is now close to its lowest level since 2014. Some analysts believe that if the US Dollar Index breaks below the 90 mark and continues to approach the 80 mark in the second half of 2021, it will have a significant impact on US stocks. Since April of this year, the US Dollar Index has continued to weaken and is now close to its lowest level since 2014.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/93a456538a24c8e401919747b4e36a36\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"321\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>Why does the US Dollar Index continue to weaken?</b>An article published on the Knowledge Leaders Capital website argues that this is not surprising, as evidenced by both US monetary easing and the budget deficit.</p><p>The article's author, Bryce Coward, points out that, firstly, the U.S. money supply continues to grow at an extremely rapid pace compared to other countries, and QE may continue at full speed until the end of 2021.</p><p>Moreover, the U.S. budget deficit as a percentage of GDP is expected to explode in 2022 or even beyond, and this indicator is closely related to the level of the US Dollar Index. The ever-expanding budget deficit suggests that it is not impossible for the US Dollar Index to remain at a level of 70 or 80 in the coming years, which is equivalent to a continued decline of 11% to 22% from current levels.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/75b0820ed0e9f32cbff404d932fea93e\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"325\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>So what impact will the continued decline in the US Dollar Index have in the short term?</b></p><p><b>The article argues that if the US Dollar Index breaks below the 90 mark and continues to approach the 80 mark in the second half of 2021, it will have a significant impact on US stocks.</b></p><p>Specifically, one of the most enduring trends in US stocks over the past 15 years has been the strong performance of technology stocks, which have outperformed basic materials stocks. However, given the correlation between the US Dollar Index and the relative performance of these two sectors, future sector rotation may shift from technology to materials.</p><p>As shown in the chart, the red line represents the relative performance of materials stocks and technology stocks. The red line has been in a downward trend since 2005, which means that technology stocks have outperformed materials stocks. This trend has only recently changed. The blue line represents the US Dollar Index, but the scale is reversed. During the same time period, the US Dollar Index was rising most of the time... until recently. The close correlation between the US Dollar Index and the relative performance of technology/materials suggests that as the US Dollar Index weakens further, US stock sector rotation will shift from technology stocks to materials stocks. This is tricky and risky for passive investors, as technology stocks account for more than 40% of the S&P 500 index.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0844a8d30c1b9cda22e17b69b943eb7e\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"325\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">However, the article also mentions that valuation factors are also behind this sector rotation. Compared to technology stocks, materials stocks are valued far below average.</p><p>As shown in the figure, the two charts show the P/E and price-to-book ratio of materials stocks relative to technology stocks, respectively, with the green line showing the average relative valuation since 2006.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35e89bf1783674007b7b0c9774be436e\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"325\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a079bcd2f1b422c405f17c0bd2e65a5d\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"325\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Valuation must always be placed in the context of profit growth. Technology stocks should be the engine of high-speed growth in the market, so theoretically they should receive higher valuations than low-growth companies. However, the relative growth of materials and technology stocks is normalizing. This doesn't mean that materials companies will grow faster than coin technology companies, but rather that the growth gap between the two types of companies is narrowing.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1ffb15881e669bd53ac1d94493aabac7\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"325\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Therefore, to summarize the point of this blog post: the recent weakening of the US dollar is due to fundamental factors such as money supply and budget deficit; If the US dollar weakens further and falls below a key level in the future, it will have a significant impact on US stocks, one of which will be sector rotation, from technology stocks to materials stocks.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>What does a weak start and a continuously weakening dollar mean for US stocks?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhat does a weak start and a continuously weakening dollar mean for US stocks?\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1084101182\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/66809d1f5c2e43e2bdf15820c6d6897e);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">华尔街见闻 </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-05-30 19:20</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Since April of this year, the US Dollar Index has continued to weaken and is now close to its lowest level since 2014. Some analysts believe that if the US Dollar Index breaks below the 90 mark and continues to approach the 80 mark in the second half of 2021, it will have a significant impact on US stocks. Since April of this year, the US Dollar Index has continued to weaken and is now close to its lowest level since 2014.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/93a456538a24c8e401919747b4e36a36\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"321\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>Why does the US Dollar Index continue to weaken?</b>An article published on the Knowledge Leaders Capital website argues that this is not surprising, as evidenced by both US monetary easing and the budget deficit.</p><p>The article's author, Bryce Coward, points out that, firstly, the U.S. money supply continues to grow at an extremely rapid pace compared to other countries, and QE may continue at full speed until the end of 2021.</p><p>Moreover, the U.S. budget deficit as a percentage of GDP is expected to explode in 2022 or even beyond, and this indicator is closely related to the level of the US Dollar Index. The ever-expanding budget deficit suggests that it is not impossible for the US Dollar Index to remain at a level of 70 or 80 in the coming years, which is equivalent to a continued decline of 11% to 22% from current levels.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/75b0820ed0e9f32cbff404d932fea93e\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"325\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>So what impact will the continued decline in the US Dollar Index have in the short term?</b></p><p><b>The article argues that if the US Dollar Index breaks below the 90 mark and continues to approach the 80 mark in the second half of 2021, it will have a significant impact on US stocks.</b></p><p>Specifically, one of the most enduring trends in US stocks over the past 15 years has been the strong performance of technology stocks, which have outperformed basic materials stocks. However, given the correlation between the US Dollar Index and the relative performance of these two sectors, future sector rotation may shift from technology to materials.</p><p>As shown in the chart, the red line represents the relative performance of materials stocks and technology stocks. The red line has been in a downward trend since 2005, which means that technology stocks have outperformed materials stocks. This trend has only recently changed. The blue line represents the US Dollar Index, but the scale is reversed. During the same time period, the US Dollar Index was rising most of the time... until recently. The close correlation between the US Dollar Index and the relative performance of technology/materials suggests that as the US Dollar Index weakens further, US stock sector rotation will shift from technology stocks to materials stocks. This is tricky and risky for passive investors, as technology stocks account for more than 40% of the S&P 500 index.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0844a8d30c1b9cda22e17b69b943eb7e\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"325\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">However, the article also mentions that valuation factors are also behind this sector rotation. Compared to technology stocks, materials stocks are valued far below average.</p><p>As shown in the figure, the two charts show the P/E and price-to-book ratio of materials stocks relative to technology stocks, respectively, with the green line showing the average relative valuation since 2006.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35e89bf1783674007b7b0c9774be436e\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"325\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a079bcd2f1b422c405f17c0bd2e65a5d\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"325\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Valuation must always be placed in the context of profit growth. Technology stocks should be the engine of high-speed growth in the market, so theoretically they should receive higher valuations than low-growth companies. However, the relative growth of materials and technology stocks is normalizing. This doesn't mean that materials companies will grow faster than coin technology companies, but rather that the growth gap between the two types of companies is narrowing.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1ffb15881e669bd53ac1d94493aabac7\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"325\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Therefore, to summarize the point of this blog post: the recent weakening of the US dollar is due to fundamental factors such as money supply and budget deficit; If the US dollar weakens further and falls below a key level in the future, it will have a significant impact on US stocks, one of which will be sector rotation, from technology stocks to materials stocks.</p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/37cf1a899f018a102327895848b06a09","relate_stocks":{"FXY":"日元ETF-CurrencyShares","TTTN":"老虎中美互联网巨头ETF","FXB":"英镑ETF-CurrencyShares","QNETCN":"纳斯达克中美互联网老虎指数","FXF":"瑞士法郎ETF-CurrencyShares","03086":"华夏纳指","EUO":"欧元ETF-ProShares两倍做空","FXE":"欧元做多ETF-CurrencyShares","FXA":"澳元ETF-CurrencyShares","YCS":"日元ETF-ProShares两倍做空"},"is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1182234546","content_text":"今年4月以来，美元指数持续走弱，截至目前已经接近2014年以来的最低水平。有分析认为，如果美元指数跌破90关口，并在2021年下半年持续向80这一关口趋近，那么将对美股产生重大影响。\n\n今年4月以来，美元指数持续走弱，截至目前已经接近2014年以来的最低水平。\n\n美元指数为何持续走弱？Knowledge Leaders Capital网站刊登的一篇文章认为，这没什么可奇怪的，无论是美国货币放水还是预算赤字都表明了这一点。\n文章作者Bryce Coward指出，首先，相对于其他国家，美国的货币供应继续以极快的速度增长，同时QE也可能全速持续到2021年底。\n不仅如此，美国预算赤字占GDP的比重预计将在2022年甚至更久之后爆炸性增长，而这一指标与美元指数水平密切相关。不断膨胀的预算赤字表明，未来几年美元指数处于70或80的水平并非不可能，这相当于从目前的水平继续下跌11%至22%。\n\n那么短期来看，美元指数持续下跌将会产生什么影响？\n文章的观点是，如果美元指数跌破90关口，并且在2021年下半年持续向80这一关口趋近，那么将对美股产生相当大的影响。\n具体来看，过去15年的时间，美股最持久的趋势之一就是科技股的强劲表现，即科技股表现优于基础材料股。不过考虑到美元指数和这两个板块相对表现之间的关联性，未来板块轮动可能从科技转向材料。\n\n 如图所示，红线代表了材料股和科技股的相对表现。自2005年以来，红线一直处于下降趋势，这意味着科技股表现强于材料股。直到最近，这一趋势才有所改变。蓝线代表着美元指数，不过刻度倒转。同样的时间段，美元指数大部分时间都在上涨……直到最近。美元指数和科技/材料相对表现之间的紧密关联表明，随着美元指数进一步疲软，美股板块轮动将从科技股轮动到材料股。对于被动投资者而言，这很棘手，也很有风险，因为科技股占到了标普500指数的比重超过40%。\n \n\n不过文章也提到，这种板块轮动背后的背后也有估值因素。相对于科技股，材料股的估值远低于平均水平。\n\n 如图所示，两张图分别显示了材料股相对科技股的市盈率和市净率，绿线显示了2006年以来的平均相对估值。\n \n估值必须始终放在盈利增长的背景下。科技股应该是市场的高速增长引擎，所以理论上科技股应该获得比低增长公司更高的估值。然而，材料股和科技股的相对增长正在正常化。这不是意味着材料公司将币科技公司增长更快，而是指这两类公司的增长速度差距正在缩小。”\n \n\n所以总结一下这篇博文的观点：美元近来走弱，是受货币供给和预算赤字等基本面因素的影响；未来如果美元进一步走软并跌破关键关口，那么将对美股产生重大影响，其中一个就是板块轮动，从科技股轮动至材料股。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TTTN":0.9,"JPYmain":0.9,"CHFmain":0.9,"YCS":0.9,"FXA":0.9,"FXE":0.9,"EURmain":0.9,"MEURmain":0.9,"CADmain":0.9,"MAUDmain":0.9,"FXY":0.9,"FXF":0.9,"NZDmain":0.9,"03086":0.9,"EUO":0.9,"GBPmain":0.9,"FXB":0.9,"MGBPmain":0.9,"QNETCN":0.9,"AUDmain":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":925,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":196365513,"gmtCreate":1621027283532,"gmtModify":1704352052311,"author":{"id":"3576195246415673","authorId":"3576195246415673","name":"Jefflau749","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3b16bea38b728770eeacee83d0ca1b56","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576195246415673","authorIdStr":"3576195246415673"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"?","listText":"?","text":"?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/196365513","repostId":"1134686534","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1134686534","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1621002693,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1134686534?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-14 22:31","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Economists have raised their US inflation forecasts for the coming year across the board.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1134686534","media":"新浪财经","summary":"明年初以前美国通胀率将会高企。","content":"<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ac47d596840d5818497ee856ff57fda0\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"344\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>A growing number of economists predict that U.S. inflation will remain high until early next year.</p><p>Bloomberg's latest monthly survey shows that forecasters have raised their forecasts for several price pressure indicators up to the first quarter of 2022, including the consumer price index, the personal consumption expenditures price index (PCE), and the PCE indicator excluding food and fuel.</p><p>According to a survey of 71 economists conducted from May 7 to 13, the CPI is expected to climb 3.8% year-on-year at the end of the second quarter of this year, and the PCE price index is expected to rise by 3%.</p><p>The latest forecasts are much higher than those at the beginning of the year, showing that forecasters are taking into account supply shortages, transportation problems, strong demand, and trillions of dollars in fiscal and monetary policy support.</p><p>“The U.S. economy’s supply capacity may not be able to keep up with demand growth, which is already evident in everything from chips to labor supply,” said James Knightley, ING’s chief international economist. \"We believe that inflation may remain high for a longer period than the Federal Reserve expects.\"</p>","source":"XLCJ","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Economists have raised their US inflation forecasts for the coming year across the board.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nEconomists have raised their US inflation forecasts for the coming year across the board.\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">新浪财经</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-05-14 22:31</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ac47d596840d5818497ee856ff57fda0\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"344\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>A growing number of economists predict that U.S. inflation will remain high until early next year.</p><p>Bloomberg's latest monthly survey shows that forecasters have raised their forecasts for several price pressure indicators up to the first quarter of 2022, including the consumer price index, the personal consumption expenditures price index (PCE), and the PCE indicator excluding food and fuel.</p><p>According to a survey of 71 economists conducted from May 7 to 13, the CPI is expected to climb 3.8% year-on-year at the end of the second quarter of this year, and the PCE price index is expected to rise by 3%.</p><p>The latest forecasts are much higher than those at the beginning of the year, showing that forecasters are taking into account supply shortages, transportation problems, strong demand, and trillions of dollars in fiscal and monetary policy support.</p><p>“The U.S. economy’s supply capacity may not be able to keep up with demand growth, which is already evident in everything from chips to labor supply,” said James Knightley, ING’s chief international economist. \"We believe that inflation may remain high for a longer period than the Federal Reserve expects.\"</p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"https://finance.sina.com.cn/stock/usstock/c/2021-05-14/doc-ikmyaawc5358865.shtml\">新浪财经</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c685480ed37cb27252b8611b704480cc","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://finance.sina.com.cn/stock/usstock/c/2021-05-14/doc-ikmyaawc5358865.shtml","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1134686534","content_text":"越来越多的经济学家预计，明年初以前美国通胀率将会高企。\n彭博进行的最新月度调查显示，预测人士上调了到2022年第一季度为止的多项物价压力指标，包括消费者价格指数、个人消费支出物价指数（PCE）以及剔除食品和燃料的PCE指标。\n根据5月7日至13日对71位经济学家的调查，今年第二季度末的CPI同比料攀升3.8%，PCE物价指数料上升3%。\n最新的预测远高于年初的预测，显示预测者将供应短缺、运输问题、需求走强以及数万亿美元的财政和货币政策支持纳入考量。\n“美国经济的供应能力可能无法跟上需求增长的步伐，这一点从芯片到劳动力供应等各个方面已经很明显，”ING首席国际经济学家James Knightley表示。“我们认为，通胀率可能在比美联储预期的更长一段时间里维持高位。”","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1072,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9969696444,"gmtCreate":1668421068588,"gmtModify":1676538054022,"author":{"id":"3576195246415673","authorId":"3576195246415673","name":"Jefflau749","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3b16bea38b728770eeacee83d0ca1b56","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576195246415673","authorIdStr":"3576195246415673"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/TIGR\">$老虎证券(TIGR)$ &nbsp;</a>ya","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/TIGR\">$老虎证券(TIGR)$ &nbsp;</a>ya","text":"$老虎证券(TIGR)$ ya","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/33faa7bf44fa7209d11e62daa206ed23","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9969696444","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":6251,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}