To The Moon

$Strategy(MSTR)$ These articles questioning MNAV are cracking me up. As if the structural risk of buying an unhedged commodity suddenly appeared and people are surprised by the impact when BTC falls. There is amplified risk on both sides. Isn't that the point of the model. Good grief. You would expect intelligent individuals to be smart. Or is there something more manipulative behind the intent of these content authors? Hard for me to believe they are not that intelligent.

$Strategy(MSTR)$ 's current downward pressure stems from predictable portfolio rebalancing activities and cyclical capital rotations. When these transitional phases conclude, the asset may demonstrate its fundamental strengths. Maintaining constructive perspective helps navigate temporary volatility.

$Strategy(MSTR)$ Just a minor tremor filtering out the faint-hearted. The bull's charging path remains unobstructed

$Strategy(MSTR)$ Shorts betting the Fed will halt the rally are scrambling to free up capital for bigger wagers

$Strategy(MSTR)$  Shorts sweating bullets before the real action kicks off

$Strategy(MSTR)$ Crypto purchasing goes live at Vanguard. Waiting for $iShares Bitcoin Trust(IBIT)$  rollout to managed and passive account holders. Fresh capital tsunami incoming.

Strategic dots emerging! Government positions in $Strategy(MSTR)$  signal institutional accumulation, BTC reserves poised for unprecedented levels

$Strategy(MSTR)$ The mega NAV resurgence is brewing. With digital asset valuation climbing and hashpower redistribution creating supply constraints, exchanges may soon face liquidity pressures. Valuation models incorporating updated NAV premiums suggest intriguing possibilities for MSTR.

$Strategy(MSTR)$  Looks like $JPMorgan Chase(JPM)$  orchestrated the dip. Still bullish myself, but someone needs to check if they're playing dirty

$Strategy(MSTR)$ I am okay to take chance at /r/n