To The Moon
Home
News
TigerAI
Log In
Sign Up
Azac
+Follow
Posts · 92
Posts · 92
Following · 0
Following · 0
Followers · 0
Followers · 0
Azac
Azac
·
2021-03-31
Like and comment
Exclusive: China considering new bourse to attract overseas-listed firms
HONG KONG (Reuters) - China is considering establishing a stock exchange to attract overseas-listed
Exclusive: China considering new bourse to attract overseas-listed firms
看
2.48K
回复
2
点赞
3
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
Azac
Azac
·
2021-03-31
Like and comment
Sorry, this post has been deleted
看
2.81K
回复
4
点赞
6
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
Azac
Azac
·
2021-03-30
Like it
Here’s How Boeing Can Test Fresh 52-Week Highs
Boeing has the look of a stock that wants to run. The question is whether bulls can muster up enough
Here’s How Boeing Can Test Fresh 52-Week Highs
看
2.53K
回复
2
点赞
2
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
Azac
Azac
·
2021-03-29
Good indeed
Sorry, this post has been deleted
看
2.20K
回复
Comment
点赞
2
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
Azac
Azac
·
2021-03-29
Indeed indeed
Adam Neumann's final WeWork act: helping SoftBank's SPAC deal
(Reuters) - An unlikely figure helped set the spark for SoftBank Group Corp’s $9 billion deal to tak
Adam Neumann's final WeWork act: helping SoftBank's SPAC deal
看
2.11K
回复
Comment
点赞
5
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
Azac
Azac
·
2021-03-27
Will it really crash?
Sorry, this post has been deleted
看
2.10K
回复
1
点赞
4
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
Azac
Azac
·
2021-03-26
Here we go again
Here's why Cathie Wood and Kevin O'Leary are still bullish on growth stocks
New York (CNN Business) - Tech stocks have taken a hit lately as investors continue to seek comfort
Here's why Cathie Wood and Kevin O'Leary are still bullish on growth stocks
看
2.00K
回复
Comment
点赞
Like
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
Azac
Azac
·
2021-03-26
Whatsuuppppp
Dow rises more than 100 points amid tame inflation data, bank shares lead
U.S. stocks climbed on Friday, led by bank shares and economic reopening plays as investors cheered
Dow rises more than 100 points amid tame inflation data, bank shares lead
看
2.66K
回复
1
点赞
3
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
Azac
Azac
·
2021-03-25
Good or bad?
Sorry, this post has been deleted
看
2.94K
回复
1
点赞
2
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
Azac
Azac
·
2021-03-24
Some are just like this
Why SPACs Won’t Replace Traditional IPOs -- and Vice Versa
Will SPACs replace traditional IPOs? I think to a degree, they already have -- at least for now. Lon
Why SPACs Won’t Replace Traditional IPOs -- and Vice Versa
看
1.33K
回复
Comment
点赞
2
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
Load more
Most Discussed
{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"isCurrentUser":false,"userPageInfo":{"id":"3575203835628386","uuid":"3575203835628386","gmtCreate":1612109811780,"gmtModify":1706620739040,"name":"Azac","pinyin":"azac","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eb0497e1bcb22483542ebadc20d76df2","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":6,"headSize":109,"tweetSize":92,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":3,"name":"书生虎","nameTw":"書生虎","represent":"努力向上","factor":"发布10条非转发主帖,其中5条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-3","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":" Tiger Idol","description":"Join the tiger community for 1500 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b40ae7da5bf081a1c84df14bf9e6367","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f160eceddd7c284a8e1136557615cfad","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11792805c468334a9b31c39f95a41c6a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2025.03.12","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-1","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Elite Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 30","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ab0f87127c854ce3191a752d57b46edc","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c9835ce48b8c8743566d344ac7a7ba8c","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76754b53ce7a90019f132c1d2fbc698f","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":"60.47%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":4,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"page":1,"watchlist":null,"tweetList":[{"id":354742381,"gmtCreate":1617203357243,"gmtModify":1704697288714,"author":{"id":"3575203835628386","authorId":"3575203835628386","name":"Azac","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eb0497e1bcb22483542ebadc20d76df2","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3575203835628386","idStr":"3575203835628386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like and comment","listText":"Like and comment","text":"Like and comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/354742381","repostId":"2123240433","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2123240433","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1617175920,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2123240433?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-31 15:32","market":"sh","language":"en","title":"Exclusive: China considering new bourse to attract overseas-listed firms","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2123240433","media":"Reuters","summary":"HONG KONG (Reuters) - China is considering establishing a stock exchange to attract overseas-listed ","content":"<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6a2aec2f17166faf15866f85301330c7\" tg-width=\"200\" tg-height=\"132\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>HONG KONG (Reuters) - China is considering establishing a stock exchange to attract overseas-listed firms and bolster the global status of its onshore share markets, two people with knowledge of the matter told Reuters.</p><p>The country's State Council has asked the top securities regulator to lead studies on how to design the exchange that would target Chinese firms listed in offshore markets such as Hong Kong and the United States, said the people.</p><p>The government hopes the initiative would also lure marquee global firms such as Apple Inc and Tesla Inc, which would have the option of carving out local businesses and listing them on the new bourse, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> of the people said.</p><p>The plan comes as Beijing and Washington remain locked in a rivalry that has featured moves by the U.S. securities regulator toward expelling Chinese companies from U.S. exchanges if they do not comply with U.S. auditing standards.</p><p>About 13 U.S.-listed Chinese firms including Alibaba Group Holding Ltd, Baidu Inc and JD.com Inc have conducted secondary listings worth a combined $36 billion in Hong Kong over the past 16 months, Refinitiv data showed.</p><p>With Sino-U.S. relations showing little sign of easing, bankers and investors expect more such \"homecoming\" offerings.</p><p>Talks for the new exchange are in early stages and a time frame and location are yet to be decided, said the people, who declined to be identified as the discussions are confidential.</p><p>The China Securities Regulatory Commission did not respond to a Reuters' request for comment.</p><p>China has two main onshore exchanges, in Shanghai and Shenzhen, with combined listed market capitalisation of 78.7 trillion yuan ($12 trillion).</p><p>The same rules govern initial public offerings as well as non-initial listings, in contrast to some other leading bourses, such as Hong Kong's, which offer waivers for secondary listings.</p><p>One option under discussion is upgrading an existing listing platform such as a smaller bourse in Beijing, said the people.</p><p>Beijing's municipal government has been lobbying for years to upgrade its equity exchange for small and mid-sized firms, known as the \"New Third Board\", to be home to U.S.-listed Chinese firms, said <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> of the people and three other sources.</p><p>The securities regulator and a few government bodies have for about six month been studying the feasibility of such an upgrade, for which there is a \"50-50\" chance of adoption, said one of the three sources.</p><p>In a meeting with regulators and institutions in February, Cai Qi, head of Beijing city's Communist Party, called for the capital to lead financial reform and develop a modern financial industry, the official Beijing Daily reported.</p><p>The Beijing government's media office did not respond to Reuters' requests for comment.</p><p>($1 = 6.5623 Chinese yuan)</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Exclusive: China considering new bourse to attract overseas-listed firms</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nExclusive: China considering new bourse to attract overseas-listed firms\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-31 15:32 GMT+8 <a href=https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=18200096><strong>Reuters</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>HONG KONG (Reuters) - China is considering establishing a stock exchange to attract overseas-listed firms and bolster the global status of its onshore share markets, two people with knowledge of the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=18200096\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6a2aec2f17166faf15866f85301330c7","relate_stocks":{"399001":"深证成指","399006":"创业板指","000001.SH":"上证指数","HSI":"恒生指数"},"source_url":"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=18200096","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2123240433","content_text":"HONG KONG (Reuters) - China is considering establishing a stock exchange to attract overseas-listed firms and bolster the global status of its onshore share markets, two people with knowledge of the matter told Reuters.The country's State Council has asked the top securities regulator to lead studies on how to design the exchange that would target Chinese firms listed in offshore markets such as Hong Kong and the United States, said the people.The government hopes the initiative would also lure marquee global firms such as Apple Inc and Tesla Inc, which would have the option of carving out local businesses and listing them on the new bourse, one of the people said.The plan comes as Beijing and Washington remain locked in a rivalry that has featured moves by the U.S. securities regulator toward expelling Chinese companies from U.S. exchanges if they do not comply with U.S. auditing standards.About 13 U.S.-listed Chinese firms including Alibaba Group Holding Ltd, Baidu Inc and JD.com Inc have conducted secondary listings worth a combined $36 billion in Hong Kong over the past 16 months, Refinitiv data showed.With Sino-U.S. relations showing little sign of easing, bankers and investors expect more such \"homecoming\" offerings.Talks for the new exchange are in early stages and a time frame and location are yet to be decided, said the people, who declined to be identified as the discussions are confidential.The China Securities Regulatory Commission did not respond to a Reuters' request for comment.China has two main onshore exchanges, in Shanghai and Shenzhen, with combined listed market capitalisation of 78.7 trillion yuan ($12 trillion).The same rules govern initial public offerings as well as non-initial listings, in contrast to some other leading bourses, such as Hong Kong's, which offer waivers for secondary listings.One option under discussion is upgrading an existing listing platform such as a smaller bourse in Beijing, said the people.Beijing's municipal government has been lobbying for years to upgrade its equity exchange for small and mid-sized firms, known as the \"New Third Board\", to be home to U.S.-listed Chinese firms, said one of the people and three other sources.The securities regulator and a few government bodies have for about six month been studying the feasibility of such an upgrade, for which there is a \"50-50\" chance of adoption, said one of the three sources.In a meeting with regulators and institutions in February, Cai Qi, head of Beijing city's Communist Party, called for the capital to lead financial reform and develop a modern financial industry, the official Beijing Daily reported.The Beijing government's media office did not respond to Reuters' requests for comment.($1 = 6.5623 Chinese yuan)","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"399001":0.9,"399006":0.9,"HSI":0.9,"000001.SH":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2478,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":354746762,"gmtCreate":1617203335056,"gmtModify":1704697288549,"author":{"id":"3575203835628386","authorId":"3575203835628386","name":"Azac","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eb0497e1bcb22483542ebadc20d76df2","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3575203835628386","idStr":"3575203835628386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like and comment","listText":"Like and comment","text":"Like and comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/354746762","repostId":"1196818239","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2812,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":355430797,"gmtCreate":1617093702419,"gmtModify":1704801869172,"author":{"id":"3575203835628386","authorId":"3575203835628386","name":"Azac","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eb0497e1bcb22483542ebadc20d76df2","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3575203835628386","idStr":"3575203835628386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like it","listText":"Like it","text":"Like it","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/355430797","repostId":"1154263159","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1154263159","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1617093284,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1154263159?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-30 16:34","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Here’s How Boeing Can Test Fresh 52-Week Highs","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1154263159","media":"The Street","summary":"Boeing has the look of a stock that wants to run. The question is whether bulls can muster up enough","content":"<blockquote>\n Boeing has the look of a stock that wants to run. The question is whether bulls can muster up enough momentum for new highs.\n</blockquote>\n<p>Boeing (<b>BA</b>) -Get Report shares got off to a strong start this week, jumping 4% at its highs on Monday.</p>\n<p>Helping drive the stock higherwas a firm order for100 737 MAX jets from Southwest Airlines (<b>LUV</b>) -Get Report.</p>\n<p>With Southwest willing to purchase more 737 MAX jets - and other airlines doing so as well - investors are hoping that Boeing has largely put those issues behind it and can get back to seeing order growth.</p>\n<p>If that’s the case, this stockcould have more momentumto it in the coming months and quarters.</p>\n<p>That’s particularly true with the reopening trade looking more and more promising as the COVID-19 vaccines arerolling out more quickly than expected.</p>\n<p>If Boeing gains a bit more momentum, it could refuel its way back to new 52-week highs. Let’s look at the chart.</p>\n<p><b>Trading Boeing</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d3a3bd0c84af2019843b15f1652dc154\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"457\">Shares pulled back hard off the recent 52-week high, up at $278.57. However, Boeing stock found support by surging off the 10-week moving average.</p>\n<p>Amid that move, it reclaimed the 10-day and 21-day moving averages as well.</p>\n<p>On Monday, the stock was trying to give bulls a daily-up rotation, by clearing and closing above Friday’s high. If Boeing can clear $250.27, it will also put it back over the 61.8% retracement.</p>\n<p>If it can do that, it puts a potentially weekly-up rotation on the table at $257.67.</p>\n<p>Bulls would love to see a weekly rotation higher, as that would really set the stage for a rally. That’s not to say Boeing can’t get back to new highs without it, but it would force the hand of traders and certainly tip bullish in that event.</p>\n<p>If shares can’t put together that type of rotational setup, let’s at least see that it can hold above the 21-day moving average. If it can’t and the 10-week moving average also fails as support, lower prices are on the way.</p>\n<p>Specifically, it would put last week’s low in play near $231.75, followed by a cluster of moving averages between $215 and $225.</p>\n<p></p>","source":"lsy1610613172068","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Here’s How Boeing Can Test Fresh 52-Week Highs</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHere’s How Boeing Can Test Fresh 52-Week Highs\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-30 16:34 GMT+8 <a href=https://www.thestreet.com/investing/boeing-ba-stock-52-week-highs-trading-032921><strong>The Street</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Boeing has the look of a stock that wants to run. The question is whether bulls can muster up enough momentum for new highs.\n\nBoeing (BA) -Get Report shares got off to a strong start this week, ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/boeing-ba-stock-52-week-highs-trading-032921\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/db65f3d4f6f7c47bb1a0c9e744a2fd64","relate_stocks":{"BA":"波音"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/boeing-ba-stock-52-week-highs-trading-032921","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1154263159","content_text":"Boeing has the look of a stock that wants to run. The question is whether bulls can muster up enough momentum for new highs.\n\nBoeing (BA) -Get Report shares got off to a strong start this week, jumping 4% at its highs on Monday.\nHelping drive the stock higherwas a firm order for100 737 MAX jets from Southwest Airlines (LUV) -Get Report.\nWith Southwest willing to purchase more 737 MAX jets - and other airlines doing so as well - investors are hoping that Boeing has largely put those issues behind it and can get back to seeing order growth.\nIf that’s the case, this stockcould have more momentumto it in the coming months and quarters.\nThat’s particularly true with the reopening trade looking more and more promising as the COVID-19 vaccines arerolling out more quickly than expected.\nIf Boeing gains a bit more momentum, it could refuel its way back to new 52-week highs. Let’s look at the chart.\nTrading Boeing\nShares pulled back hard off the recent 52-week high, up at $278.57. However, Boeing stock found support by surging off the 10-week moving average.\nAmid that move, it reclaimed the 10-day and 21-day moving averages as well.\nOn Monday, the stock was trying to give bulls a daily-up rotation, by clearing and closing above Friday’s high. If Boeing can clear $250.27, it will also put it back over the 61.8% retracement.\nIf it can do that, it puts a potentially weekly-up rotation on the table at $257.67.\nBulls would love to see a weekly rotation higher, as that would really set the stage for a rally. That’s not to say Boeing can’t get back to new highs without it, but it would force the hand of traders and certainly tip bullish in that event.\nIf shares can’t put together that type of rotational setup, let’s at least see that it can hold above the 21-day moving average. If it can’t and the 10-week moving average also fails as support, lower prices are on the way.\nSpecifically, it would put last week’s low in play near $231.75, followed by a cluster of moving averages between $215 and $225.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"BA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2532,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":355051365,"gmtCreate":1617017657157,"gmtModify":1704800869211,"author":{"id":"3575203835628386","authorId":"3575203835628386","name":"Azac","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eb0497e1bcb22483542ebadc20d76df2","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3575203835628386","idStr":"3575203835628386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good indeed","listText":"Good indeed","text":"Good indeed","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/355051365","repostId":"1158986665","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2198,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":355053787,"gmtCreate":1617017623749,"gmtModify":1704800870199,"author":{"id":"3575203835628386","authorId":"3575203835628386","name":"Azac","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eb0497e1bcb22483542ebadc20d76df2","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3575203835628386","idStr":"3575203835628386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Indeed indeed","listText":"Indeed indeed","text":"Indeed indeed","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/355053787","repostId":"1198529750","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1198529750","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1617017479,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1198529750?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-29 19:31","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Adam Neumann's final WeWork act: helping SoftBank's SPAC deal","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1198529750","media":"Reuters","summary":"(Reuters) - An unlikely figure helped set the spark for SoftBank Group Corp’s $9 billion deal to tak","content":"<p>(Reuters) - An unlikely figure helped set the spark for SoftBank Group Corp’s $9 billion deal to take WeWork public.</p>\n<p>Adam Neumann, WeWork’s co-founder and ousted chief executive, met in November with the head of the special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) that would go on to clinch a deal with WeWork, according to people familiar with the matter.</p>\n<p>Neumann was locked in a fierce legal battle at the time with SoftBank over a $3 billion deal for a portion of his and other investors’ stake in the office space-sharing company.</p>\n<p>The introduction between Neumann and BowX Acquisition Corp co-chief executive Vivek Ranadivé over a Zoom call was facilitated by a senior UBS Group AG capital markets banker, the sources said. It preceded discussions the SPAC chief had with WeWork.</p>\n<p>Neumann played up WeWork’s prospects on the call and the conversation piqued Ranadivé’s interest, the sources said.</p>\n<p>Ranadivé’s SPAC had been looking for an acquisition target after raising $420 million in an IPO in August.</p>\n<p>The ensuing deal announced on Friday cushions some of the blow SoftBank has suffered with its investment in WeWork. It has invested at least $18.5 billion in WeWork since 2017, including $6 billion when a fundraising round valued the startup at $47 billion in January 2019.</p>\n<p>The sources described the meeting between Neumann and Ranadivé on condition of anonymity. Representatives for Neumann, UBS and SoftBank declined to comment. Ranadivé did not respond to multiple requests for comment.</p>\n<p>Neumann, who has kept a low profile since his unceremonious ouster after WeWork’s failed IPO attempt in 2019, has had a contentious relationship with SoftBank.</p>\n<p>The Japanese tech investment giant pushed for his ouster before it took over WeWork in a $10 billion rescue financing deal in October 2019. It later backtracked on an agreement to buy $3 billion of WeWork shares from Neumann and other investors, citing criminal and civil investigations into WeWork, the company’s failure to restructure a joint venture in China, and the shift to remote work due to the COVID-19 outbreak.</p>\n<p>One week before the case was due to go to trial, SoftBank reached a settlement with Neumann and other investors in February to pay out about half of its original commitment. It did not want the potential legal liability to jeopardize the SPAC deal, the sources said.</p>\n<p>Neumann also stands to benefit from the SPAC deal as he still has a roughly 10% stake in WeWork, worth around $790 million.</p>\n<p><b>LIMITED OPTIONS</b></p>\n<p>Neumann had no role in the SPAC deal after his discussion with Ranadivé, the sources said. Ranadivé and his team began discussions with WeWork in December. SoftBank Chief Operating Officer and WeWork Executive Chairman Marcelo Claure led the negotiations on behalf of SoftBank, with SoftBank CEO Masayoshi Son also stepping in, one of the sources said.</p>\n<p>WeWork was apprehensive about opting for a traditional IPO following its failed attempt in 2019, and its options for a SPAC deal were limited. BowX was the only SPAC that expressed a serious interest in WeWork, two of the sources said.</p>\n<p>Ranadivé, a 63-year-old technology executive turned investor and owner of the Sacramento Kings basketball team, said last week WeWork stood to benefit from a shift by many companies to a hybrid model of working that calls for employees to come in to a workplace just a few days a month.</p>\n<p>He called the shift a tailwind for WeWork.</p>\n<p>The deal was received well by Wall Street, with BowX shares ending trade on Friday up 20% following the merger’s announcement.</p>\n<p>WeWork’s valuation was revised down in the final stages of the negotiations. Investors participating in the private investment in public equity (PIPE) transaction managed to drive down WeWork’s valuation in the agreement from $9.9 billion to $9 billion, including debt, the sources said. The size of the PIPE increased to $800 million from $500 million.</p>\n<p>Ranadivé and the rest of the BowX senior team will receive WeWork shares worth almost $90 million after investing $11.7 million of their own money. They will be restricted from selling these shares for the first year unless certain share price targets are met. (Reporting by Joshua Franklin in Boston and Anirban Sen in Bangalore; Editing by Greg Roumeliotis and Edwina Gibbs)</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Adam Neumann's final WeWork act: helping SoftBank's SPAC deal</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAdam Neumann's final WeWork act: helping SoftBank's SPAC deal\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-03-29 19:31</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>(Reuters) - An unlikely figure helped set the spark for SoftBank Group Corp’s $9 billion deal to take WeWork public.</p>\n<p>Adam Neumann, WeWork’s co-founder and ousted chief executive, met in November with the head of the special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) that would go on to clinch a deal with WeWork, according to people familiar with the matter.</p>\n<p>Neumann was locked in a fierce legal battle at the time with SoftBank over a $3 billion deal for a portion of his and other investors’ stake in the office space-sharing company.</p>\n<p>The introduction between Neumann and BowX Acquisition Corp co-chief executive Vivek Ranadivé over a Zoom call was facilitated by a senior UBS Group AG capital markets banker, the sources said. It preceded discussions the SPAC chief had with WeWork.</p>\n<p>Neumann played up WeWork’s prospects on the call and the conversation piqued Ranadivé’s interest, the sources said.</p>\n<p>Ranadivé’s SPAC had been looking for an acquisition target after raising $420 million in an IPO in August.</p>\n<p>The ensuing deal announced on Friday cushions some of the blow SoftBank has suffered with its investment in WeWork. It has invested at least $18.5 billion in WeWork since 2017, including $6 billion when a fundraising round valued the startup at $47 billion in January 2019.</p>\n<p>The sources described the meeting between Neumann and Ranadivé on condition of anonymity. Representatives for Neumann, UBS and SoftBank declined to comment. Ranadivé did not respond to multiple requests for comment.</p>\n<p>Neumann, who has kept a low profile since his unceremonious ouster after WeWork’s failed IPO attempt in 2019, has had a contentious relationship with SoftBank.</p>\n<p>The Japanese tech investment giant pushed for his ouster before it took over WeWork in a $10 billion rescue financing deal in October 2019. It later backtracked on an agreement to buy $3 billion of WeWork shares from Neumann and other investors, citing criminal and civil investigations into WeWork, the company’s failure to restructure a joint venture in China, and the shift to remote work due to the COVID-19 outbreak.</p>\n<p>One week before the case was due to go to trial, SoftBank reached a settlement with Neumann and other investors in February to pay out about half of its original commitment. It did not want the potential legal liability to jeopardize the SPAC deal, the sources said.</p>\n<p>Neumann also stands to benefit from the SPAC deal as he still has a roughly 10% stake in WeWork, worth around $790 million.</p>\n<p><b>LIMITED OPTIONS</b></p>\n<p>Neumann had no role in the SPAC deal after his discussion with Ranadivé, the sources said. Ranadivé and his team began discussions with WeWork in December. SoftBank Chief Operating Officer and WeWork Executive Chairman Marcelo Claure led the negotiations on behalf of SoftBank, with SoftBank CEO Masayoshi Son also stepping in, one of the sources said.</p>\n<p>WeWork was apprehensive about opting for a traditional IPO following its failed attempt in 2019, and its options for a SPAC deal were limited. BowX was the only SPAC that expressed a serious interest in WeWork, two of the sources said.</p>\n<p>Ranadivé, a 63-year-old technology executive turned investor and owner of the Sacramento Kings basketball team, said last week WeWork stood to benefit from a shift by many companies to a hybrid model of working that calls for employees to come in to a workplace just a few days a month.</p>\n<p>He called the shift a tailwind for WeWork.</p>\n<p>The deal was received well by Wall Street, with BowX shares ending trade on Friday up 20% following the merger’s announcement.</p>\n<p>WeWork’s valuation was revised down in the final stages of the negotiations. Investors participating in the private investment in public equity (PIPE) transaction managed to drive down WeWork’s valuation in the agreement from $9.9 billion to $9 billion, including debt, the sources said. The size of the PIPE increased to $800 million from $500 million.</p>\n<p>Ranadivé and the rest of the BowX senior team will receive WeWork shares worth almost $90 million after investing $11.7 million of their own money. They will be restricted from selling these shares for the first year unless certain share price targets are met. (Reporting by Joshua Franklin in Boston and Anirban Sen in Bangalore; Editing by Greg Roumeliotis and Edwina Gibbs)</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1198529750","content_text":"(Reuters) - An unlikely figure helped set the spark for SoftBank Group Corp’s $9 billion deal to take WeWork public.\nAdam Neumann, WeWork’s co-founder and ousted chief executive, met in November with the head of the special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) that would go on to clinch a deal with WeWork, according to people familiar with the matter.\nNeumann was locked in a fierce legal battle at the time with SoftBank over a $3 billion deal for a portion of his and other investors’ stake in the office space-sharing company.\nThe introduction between Neumann and BowX Acquisition Corp co-chief executive Vivek Ranadivé over a Zoom call was facilitated by a senior UBS Group AG capital markets banker, the sources said. It preceded discussions the SPAC chief had with WeWork.\nNeumann played up WeWork’s prospects on the call and the conversation piqued Ranadivé’s interest, the sources said.\nRanadivé’s SPAC had been looking for an acquisition target after raising $420 million in an IPO in August.\nThe ensuing deal announced on Friday cushions some of the blow SoftBank has suffered with its investment in WeWork. It has invested at least $18.5 billion in WeWork since 2017, including $6 billion when a fundraising round valued the startup at $47 billion in January 2019.\nThe sources described the meeting between Neumann and Ranadivé on condition of anonymity. Representatives for Neumann, UBS and SoftBank declined to comment. Ranadivé did not respond to multiple requests for comment.\nNeumann, who has kept a low profile since his unceremonious ouster after WeWork’s failed IPO attempt in 2019, has had a contentious relationship with SoftBank.\nThe Japanese tech investment giant pushed for his ouster before it took over WeWork in a $10 billion rescue financing deal in October 2019. It later backtracked on an agreement to buy $3 billion of WeWork shares from Neumann and other investors, citing criminal and civil investigations into WeWork, the company’s failure to restructure a joint venture in China, and the shift to remote work due to the COVID-19 outbreak.\nOne week before the case was due to go to trial, SoftBank reached a settlement with Neumann and other investors in February to pay out about half of its original commitment. It did not want the potential legal liability to jeopardize the SPAC deal, the sources said.\nNeumann also stands to benefit from the SPAC deal as he still has a roughly 10% stake in WeWork, worth around $790 million.\nLIMITED OPTIONS\nNeumann had no role in the SPAC deal after his discussion with Ranadivé, the sources said. Ranadivé and his team began discussions with WeWork in December. SoftBank Chief Operating Officer and WeWork Executive Chairman Marcelo Claure led the negotiations on behalf of SoftBank, with SoftBank CEO Masayoshi Son also stepping in, one of the sources said.\nWeWork was apprehensive about opting for a traditional IPO following its failed attempt in 2019, and its options for a SPAC deal were limited. BowX was the only SPAC that expressed a serious interest in WeWork, two of the sources said.\nRanadivé, a 63-year-old technology executive turned investor and owner of the Sacramento Kings basketball team, said last week WeWork stood to benefit from a shift by many companies to a hybrid model of working that calls for employees to come in to a workplace just a few days a month.\nHe called the shift a tailwind for WeWork.\nThe deal was received well by Wall Street, with BowX shares ending trade on Friday up 20% following the merger’s announcement.\nWeWork’s valuation was revised down in the final stages of the negotiations. Investors participating in the private investment in public equity (PIPE) transaction managed to drive down WeWork’s valuation in the agreement from $9.9 billion to $9 billion, including debt, the sources said. The size of the PIPE increased to $800 million from $500 million.\nRanadivé and the rest of the BowX senior team will receive WeWork shares worth almost $90 million after investing $11.7 million of their own money. They will be restricted from selling these shares for the first year unless certain share price targets are met. (Reporting by Joshua Franklin in Boston and Anirban Sen in Bangalore; Editing by Greg Roumeliotis and Edwina Gibbs)","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2106,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":356577383,"gmtCreate":1616802989242,"gmtModify":1704799166771,"author":{"id":"3575203835628386","authorId":"3575203835628386","name":"Azac","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eb0497e1bcb22483542ebadc20d76df2","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3575203835628386","idStr":"3575203835628386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Will it really crash? ","listText":"Will it really crash? ","text":"Will it really crash?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/356577383","repostId":"1119843211","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2095,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":356154484,"gmtCreate":1616766282648,"gmtModify":1704798603127,"author":{"id":"3575203835628386","authorId":"3575203835628386","name":"Azac","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eb0497e1bcb22483542ebadc20d76df2","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3575203835628386","idStr":"3575203835628386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Here we go again","listText":"Here we go again","text":"Here we go again","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/356154484","repostId":"1192588043","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1192588043","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1616765117,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1192588043?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-26 21:25","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Here's why Cathie Wood and Kevin O'Leary are still bullish on growth stocks","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1192588043","media":"CNN Business","summary":"New York (CNN Business) - Tech stocks have taken a hit lately as investors continue to seek comfort ","content":"<p><b>New York (CNN Business) - </b>Tech stocks have taken a hit lately as investors continue to seek comfort in banks, big oil and other value sectors. But some fans of trendy momentum stocks aren't giving up on them just yet.</p>\n<p>That's the message from Cathie Wood of Ark Invest — who has become one of the more influential voices on Wall Street and is a major backer of Tesla (TSLA)— and two other titans of growth investing, who shared their investment insights Thursday.</p>\n<p>\"We've seen higher valuation stocks hit hard this year. But the growth for these innovative companies will still be treated well over time,\" Wood said during a webcast hosted by Cboe (CBOE) Global Markets.</p>\n<p>Wood joined Kevin O'Leary of \"Shark Tank\" fame (he also runs a family of O'Shares ETFs) and Jan van Eck, whose firm recently launched the BUZZ ETF that tracks stocks popular on social media, for the Cboe chat.</p>\n<p>Wood noted that investors are shifting their money into more so-called cyclical areas — those dependent on the success of the economy, like retailers and airlines — and said that's a good thing. She's encouraged to see that the broader market rally is broadening even further.</p>\n<p><b>The bullish case for growth stocks still exists</b></p>\n<p>As the economy continues its fragile recovery, fears about bond yields and inflation have been high. But all three of the fund managers said they are not too worried about these trends hurting growth stocks.</p>\n<p>They also stressed that younger individual investors will continue to play a big role in the market thanks to the rise of zero commission brokerage firms: \"There are a lot of retail investors playing in the market thanks to Robinhood and Coinbase. Individual investors are more engaged,\" van Eck said.</p>\n<p>He says investors should flock more to companies that have a big competitive advantage, such as those in his firm'sWide Moat ETF(MOAT)— which invests in stocks that are dominant in their respective fields, like its key holdings including Charles Schwab (SCHW),Intel (INTC),Microsoft (MSFT) and Amazon(AMZN).</p>\n<p>O'Leary, too, believes the stock market boom can last, saying he $1.9 trillion in new stimulus is \"free money\" for many investors. But he's not buying into the notion that cyclical stocks can continue to outperform tech for much longer.</p>\n<p>\"Yes, people are seeking quality. But some sectors are permanently damaged and airlines are one of them due to technology,\" he said. \"I don't need to fly to Dubai as much anymore for meetings when were doing Zoom calls every week.\"</p>\n<p>O'Leary said he is also willing to make some speculative bets on emerging industries that aren't getting a lot of attention. For example, O'Leary's firm owns shares of MindMed (MMEDF), which is working on developing legal psychedelic medications that can be used to help treat depression, anxiety and other mental health disorders.</p>\n<p>Wood is also investing in innovative health care companies, with oneArk ETF devoted to genomics (ARKG). And she thinks younger investors, many of whom are inheriting money from baby boomers, will continue to gravitate toward more dynamic fields like robotics and alternative energy. So she's not too concerned that the recent rebound in value stocks spells an end to the tech renaissance.</p>\n<p>\"A lot of companies catering to short-term investors who wanted profits now invested more in stock buybacks and dividends over innovation,\" Wood said. \"That puts them in harm's way.\"</p>\n<p><b>'Prime time' for bitcoin coming?</b></p>\n<p>Wood also thinks bitcoin is ready for \"prime time\" and that prices will continue climbing over the long haul as more companies will adopt crypto-friendly strategies like Tesla andSquar(SQ)have done. In fact, Wood said she thinks it makes sense for investors to have between 2.5% and 6.5% of their assets in bitcoin, adding that her funds are betting on crypto primarily through the publicly traded Grayscale Bitcoin Trus.(GBTC)</p>\n<p>O'Leary, meanwhile, had been somewhat skeptical of bitcoin a few years ago. But he said Thursday that he is growing more convinced that bitcoin will gain traction, and he believes it makes to have about 3% of a portfolio in bitcoin as well as crypto miner stocks.</p>\n<p>And van Eck noted that the upcoming market debut of Coinbase will be one to watch — at a potential valuation of $100 billion following its direct listing, the stock would dwarf the roughly $24 billion market value of Nasda.(NDAQ)</p>\n<p>With that in mind, van Eck expects more big investment firms to try to cash in on bitcoin or risk being left out.Fidelit,(EFIPX) for example, just jointed a growing list of firms filing to launch a crypto ETF with the SEC.</p>\n<p>\"Crypto Wall Street will be a disruptive threat to traditional banks and institutions,\" van Eck said.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Here's why Cathie Wood and Kevin O'Leary are still bullish on growth stocks</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHere's why Cathie Wood and Kevin O'Leary are still bullish on growth stocks\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-26 21:25 GMT+8 <a href=https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/25/investing/cathie-wood-kevin-oleary-vaneck-stocks/index.html><strong>CNN Business</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>New York (CNN Business) - Tech stocks have taken a hit lately as investors continue to seek comfort in banks, big oil and other value sectors. But some fans of trendy momentum stocks aren't giving up ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/25/investing/cathie-wood-kevin-oleary-vaneck-stocks/index.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"ARKG":"ARK Genomic Revolution ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯","GBTC":"比特币ETF-Grayscale",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/25/investing/cathie-wood-kevin-oleary-vaneck-stocks/index.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1192588043","content_text":"New York (CNN Business) - Tech stocks have taken a hit lately as investors continue to seek comfort in banks, big oil and other value sectors. But some fans of trendy momentum stocks aren't giving up on them just yet.\nThat's the message from Cathie Wood of Ark Invest — who has become one of the more influential voices on Wall Street and is a major backer of Tesla (TSLA)— and two other titans of growth investing, who shared their investment insights Thursday.\n\"We've seen higher valuation stocks hit hard this year. But the growth for these innovative companies will still be treated well over time,\" Wood said during a webcast hosted by Cboe (CBOE) Global Markets.\nWood joined Kevin O'Leary of \"Shark Tank\" fame (he also runs a family of O'Shares ETFs) and Jan van Eck, whose firm recently launched the BUZZ ETF that tracks stocks popular on social media, for the Cboe chat.\nWood noted that investors are shifting their money into more so-called cyclical areas — those dependent on the success of the economy, like retailers and airlines — and said that's a good thing. She's encouraged to see that the broader market rally is broadening even further.\nThe bullish case for growth stocks still exists\nAs the economy continues its fragile recovery, fears about bond yields and inflation have been high. But all three of the fund managers said they are not too worried about these trends hurting growth stocks.\nThey also stressed that younger individual investors will continue to play a big role in the market thanks to the rise of zero commission brokerage firms: \"There are a lot of retail investors playing in the market thanks to Robinhood and Coinbase. Individual investors are more engaged,\" van Eck said.\nHe says investors should flock more to companies that have a big competitive advantage, such as those in his firm'sWide Moat ETF(MOAT)— which invests in stocks that are dominant in their respective fields, like its key holdings including Charles Schwab (SCHW),Intel (INTC),Microsoft (MSFT) and Amazon(AMZN).\nO'Leary, too, believes the stock market boom can last, saying he $1.9 trillion in new stimulus is \"free money\" for many investors. But he's not buying into the notion that cyclical stocks can continue to outperform tech for much longer.\n\"Yes, people are seeking quality. But some sectors are permanently damaged and airlines are one of them due to technology,\" he said. \"I don't need to fly to Dubai as much anymore for meetings when were doing Zoom calls every week.\"\nO'Leary said he is also willing to make some speculative bets on emerging industries that aren't getting a lot of attention. For example, O'Leary's firm owns shares of MindMed (MMEDF), which is working on developing legal psychedelic medications that can be used to help treat depression, anxiety and other mental health disorders.\nWood is also investing in innovative health care companies, with oneArk ETF devoted to genomics (ARKG). And she thinks younger investors, many of whom are inheriting money from baby boomers, will continue to gravitate toward more dynamic fields like robotics and alternative energy. So she's not too concerned that the recent rebound in value stocks spells an end to the tech renaissance.\n\"A lot of companies catering to short-term investors who wanted profits now invested more in stock buybacks and dividends over innovation,\" Wood said. \"That puts them in harm's way.\"\n'Prime time' for bitcoin coming?\nWood also thinks bitcoin is ready for \"prime time\" and that prices will continue climbing over the long haul as more companies will adopt crypto-friendly strategies like Tesla andSquar(SQ)have done. In fact, Wood said she thinks it makes sense for investors to have between 2.5% and 6.5% of their assets in bitcoin, adding that her funds are betting on crypto primarily through the publicly traded Grayscale Bitcoin Trus.(GBTC)\nO'Leary, meanwhile, had been somewhat skeptical of bitcoin a few years ago. But he said Thursday that he is growing more convinced that bitcoin will gain traction, and he believes it makes to have about 3% of a portfolio in bitcoin as well as crypto miner stocks.\nAnd van Eck noted that the upcoming market debut of Coinbase will be one to watch — at a potential valuation of $100 billion following its direct listing, the stock would dwarf the roughly $24 billion market value of Nasda.(NDAQ)\nWith that in mind, van Eck expects more big investment firms to try to cash in on bitcoin or risk being left out.Fidelit,(EFIPX) for example, just jointed a growing list of firms filing to launch a crypto ETF with the SEC.\n\"Crypto Wall Street will be a disruptive threat to traditional banks and institutions,\" van Eck said.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".IXIC":0.9,"XBTmain":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9,"ARKG":0.9,"BTCmain":0.9,"GBTC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1999,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":356154397,"gmtCreate":1616766262919,"gmtModify":1704798602156,"author":{"id":"3575203835628386","authorId":"3575203835628386","name":"Azac","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eb0497e1bcb22483542ebadc20d76df2","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3575203835628386","idStr":"3575203835628386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Whatsuuppppp","listText":"Whatsuuppppp","text":"Whatsuuppppp","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/356154397","repostId":"1104998749","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1104998749","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1616765504,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1104998749?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-26 21:31","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Dow rises more than 100 points amid tame inflation data, bank shares lead","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1104998749","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"U.S. stocks climbed on Friday, led by bank shares and economic reopening plays as investors cheered ","content":"<p>U.S. stocks climbed on Friday, led by bank shares and economic reopening plays as investors cheered data showing subdued inflation.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average gained 118 points. The S&P 500 rose 0.4%, while the Nasdaq Composite climbed 0.2%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5467cdbacf419736bd8452e030e0c531\" tg-width=\"1036\" tg-height=\"443\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Bank stocks rose after the Fed announced that banks could resume buybacks and raise dividends starting at the end of June. The central bank originally said it would lift pandemic era restrictions in the first quarter, but even the delayed move gives investors more clarity.</p><p>Shares of JPMorgan rose 1.5%, while Bank of America advanced 2%. Goldman Sachs gained 1%.</p><p>Classic reopening plays built on the momentum from the previous session. American Airlines climbed 1%, while Royal Caribbean, Carnival and Norwegian Cruise Line all climbed more than 1%.</p><p>The core personal consumption expenditure price index, which strips out volatile food and energy prices, rose 0.1% month over month, matching expectations from economists polled by Dow Jones. Year over year, the gauge climbed 1.4%, slightly lower than a 1.5% estimate.</p><p>The move in futures comes after stocks bounced in afternoon trading on Thursday, with the Dow swinging more than 500 points as cyclical trades gained steam. The strong close broke a recent trend of poor finishes on Wall Street and trimmed the market’s week-to-date losses. The Dow and S&P 500 are now down less than 0.1% for the week, while the Nasdaq Composite is in the red by 1.8%.</p><p>“If you’re positioned the way we are, which is for a cyclical recovery and being overweight the value sectors, certainly you can’t run a victory lap here. But it is nice to see, after the last six days, that some of the trends that have been in place for the better part of six months seem to be reasserting themselves,” Jason Trennert, CEO of Strategas Research Partners, said on CNBC’s “Closing Bell.”</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Dow rises more than 100 points amid tame inflation data, bank shares lead</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDow rises more than 100 points amid tame inflation data, bank shares lead\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-03-26 21:31</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>U.S. stocks climbed on Friday, led by bank shares and economic reopening plays as investors cheered data showing subdued inflation.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average gained 118 points. The S&P 500 rose 0.4%, while the Nasdaq Composite climbed 0.2%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5467cdbacf419736bd8452e030e0c531\" tg-width=\"1036\" tg-height=\"443\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Bank stocks rose after the Fed announced that banks could resume buybacks and raise dividends starting at the end of June. The central bank originally said it would lift pandemic era restrictions in the first quarter, but even the delayed move gives investors more clarity.</p><p>Shares of JPMorgan rose 1.5%, while Bank of America advanced 2%. Goldman Sachs gained 1%.</p><p>Classic reopening plays built on the momentum from the previous session. American Airlines climbed 1%, while Royal Caribbean, Carnival and Norwegian Cruise Line all climbed more than 1%.</p><p>The core personal consumption expenditure price index, which strips out volatile food and energy prices, rose 0.1% month over month, matching expectations from economists polled by Dow Jones. Year over year, the gauge climbed 1.4%, slightly lower than a 1.5% estimate.</p><p>The move in futures comes after stocks bounced in afternoon trading on Thursday, with the Dow swinging more than 500 points as cyclical trades gained steam. The strong close broke a recent trend of poor finishes on Wall Street and trimmed the market’s week-to-date losses. The Dow and S&P 500 are now down less than 0.1% for the week, while the Nasdaq Composite is in the red by 1.8%.</p><p>“If you’re positioned the way we are, which is for a cyclical recovery and being overweight the value sectors, certainly you can’t run a victory lap here. But it is nice to see, after the last six days, that some of the trends that have been in place for the better part of six months seem to be reasserting themselves,” Jason Trennert, CEO of Strategas Research Partners, said on CNBC’s “Closing Bell.”</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1104998749","content_text":"U.S. stocks climbed on Friday, led by bank shares and economic reopening plays as investors cheered data showing subdued inflation.The Dow Jones Industrial Average gained 118 points. The S&P 500 rose 0.4%, while the Nasdaq Composite climbed 0.2%.Bank stocks rose after the Fed announced that banks could resume buybacks and raise dividends starting at the end of June. The central bank originally said it would lift pandemic era restrictions in the first quarter, but even the delayed move gives investors more clarity.Shares of JPMorgan rose 1.5%, while Bank of America advanced 2%. Goldman Sachs gained 1%.Classic reopening plays built on the momentum from the previous session. American Airlines climbed 1%, while Royal Caribbean, Carnival and Norwegian Cruise Line all climbed more than 1%.The core personal consumption expenditure price index, which strips out volatile food and energy prices, rose 0.1% month over month, matching expectations from economists polled by Dow Jones. Year over year, the gauge climbed 1.4%, slightly lower than a 1.5% estimate.The move in futures comes after stocks bounced in afternoon trading on Thursday, with the Dow swinging more than 500 points as cyclical trades gained steam. The strong close broke a recent trend of poor finishes on Wall Street and trimmed the market’s week-to-date losses. The Dow and S&P 500 are now down less than 0.1% for the week, while the Nasdaq Composite is in the red by 1.8%.“If you’re positioned the way we are, which is for a cyclical recovery and being overweight the value sectors, certainly you can’t run a victory lap here. But it is nice to see, after the last six days, that some of the trends that have been in place for the better part of six months seem to be reasserting themselves,” Jason Trennert, CEO of Strategas Research Partners, said on CNBC’s “Closing Bell.”","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2661,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":351492147,"gmtCreate":1616621238789,"gmtModify":1704796482581,"author":{"id":"3575203835628386","authorId":"3575203835628386","name":"Azac","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eb0497e1bcb22483542ebadc20d76df2","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3575203835628386","idStr":"3575203835628386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good or bad?","listText":"Good or bad?","text":"Good or bad?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/351492147","repostId":"1175341082","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2935,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":353737379,"gmtCreate":1616529361591,"gmtModify":1704795289661,"author":{"id":"3575203835628386","authorId":"3575203835628386","name":"Azac","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eb0497e1bcb22483542ebadc20d76df2","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3575203835628386","idStr":"3575203835628386"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Some are just like this","listText":"Some are just like this","text":"Some are just like this","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/353737379","repostId":"1102596742","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1102596742","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1616514133,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1102596742?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-23 23:42","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why SPACs Won’t Replace Traditional IPOs -- and Vice Versa","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1102596742","media":"TheStreet","summary":"Will SPACs replace traditional IPOs? I think to a degree, they already have -- at least for now. Lon","content":"<p>Will SPACs replace traditional IPOs? I think to a degree, they already have -- at least for now. Longer-term, however, I think that traditional investment banking will survive, and that there will always be room for both methods of going public.</p>\n<p>Part of why I say that traditional IPOs will survive is due to the sheer abundance of SPACs out there right now. Can they all find winning companies to merge with? What happens to those that don't find the right dance partner? Surely some will wither and die. But at the same time, the SPAC model is probably here to stay since it does simplify and expedite the whole process of going public and raising capital. And so I think that SPACs will survive even once we’re past the current manic stage.</p>\n<p>First, understand that IPOs and SPACs are really just two ways of getting a private company from point A (in need of capital) to point B (capital needs satisfied and trading publicly). As you'll see, it's really a matter of putting the wagon before the horse, or the horse before the wagon. And the same model doesn’t work for every private company in every situation.</p>\n<p><b>The IPO</b></p>\n<p>The traditional IPO, or Initial Public Offering, has been around since the beginning. This is what investment bankers, among other things, do for a living. As a former senior New York Stock Exchange floor trader who worked as part of the IPO team for what was considered the hottest investment bank during the internet bubble of the late 1990's, early 2000's, I have a great deal of experience in both supporting and in running the execution end of traditional IPOs, either from the booth, or in the crowd at the point of sale.</p>\n<p>In simplified form, IPOs involve private companies working with an investment bank or several investment banks to raise capital by “going public.\" The investment banks place a value on the private firm through a strenuous level of fundamental analysis, all the while gauging or trying to drum up demand. That part of the job is often referred to as a \"road show.\"</p>\n<p>The private company must also register with the exchange where it plans to list, as well as the Securities and Exchange Commission. There is a lengthy process that must be followed, as well as numerous requirements, such as compliance around transparency in financial reporting, that must be met.</p>\n<p>The investment bank or banks, also known as the underwriters, may guarantee the IPO by purchasing the offering in a firm commitment and then selling the shares themselves in the secondary market. Without this \"firm\" commitment, the IPO is considered to be a \"best effort\" agreement, in which the underwriter sells the shares with no guarantee.</p>\n<p>In my experience, the vast majority of IPOs are indeed “firm commitments” in which the underwriter takes on either the profit or loss (the risk) when selling shares after having priced the IPO. In the case of a \"best effort'' IPO, the investment bank is really more like a broker and advisor than a trader, and passes on to the formerly private company's shareholders the proceeds of those initial sales.</p>\n<p><b>The SPAC</b></p>\n<p>The SPAC, or Special Purpose Acquisition Company, has become increasingly popular lately. Some of you may have heard of \"Blank Check Companies.\" This is another term for basically the same thing as a SPAC. The whole idea is simply to raise funds first and then target private companies to merge with afterwards.</p>\n<p>In this way, the private firm is able to get in position to quickly merge with an already-public company, greatly simplifying the process of going public. At that point, the shareholders or owners of the private company can either redeem their stakes at the offering price, or accept stock in the newly-merged company, depending on their preference.</p>\n<p>Why would a private company choose this route over a traditional IPO? There are several good reasons. The first is speed to market. By foregoing the whole \"road show\" process and merging with an already public firm, the company can now bypass all of the registrations and regulatory requirements. In addition, the risk of allowing investment bankers to price the deal is removed once the merger is agreed to.</p>\n<p>What makes SPACs so attractive to private companies that might be in need of capital? It’s pretty simple --<i>in a traditional IPO, the private company chases the capital, but with a SPAC, the capital chases the private company</i>.</p>\n<p>Notably, the SPAC structure is less risky to the owners of the targeted private company. The private company negotiates and agrees to a deal. Their work is now done, and the risk is transferred to the SPAC. This is great -- if you happen to run a highly sought-after private company in a suddenly hot industry. That is another reason why speed matters. No one ever knows how long the iron (or industry) stays hot.</p>\n<p>Now, for the less highly sought-after private business, there will always be a need for a traditional investment banker since these companies still need to raise capital and will need help finding investors. However, in the IPO model, the workload and the risk are more on the private company than they are on the bank -- at least until the issue is priced and regardless of whether a firm commitment has been made.</p>\n<p><b>The Bottom Line</b></p>\n<p>In my opinion, there will always be room in this marketplace for both traditional investment bankers as well as SPACs. For now, amid a pandemic, which has largely taken the \"road show\" aspect out of the IPO, and as certain industries have taken off seemingly overnight, SPACs have taken as much as half of the market for new issues.</p>\n<p>That is the current environment and it is not only subject to change, it<i>will</i>change. As some SPACs fail to attract potentially hot new private companies, their ranks will thin. In a market that’s tougher than the current bull one, raising money ahead of a deal becomes more difficult, and the pendulum will swing back toward traditional investment bankers who provide access to a broader array of potential investors.</p>\n<p>That said, these are two ways of going about doing the same thing. Neither is going away. Quality will succeed where success is deserved, and so quality investment bankers will outperform lower-quality SPACs and vice versa. Where quality is less obvious, there will be failure to last, or to find the right dance partner. The route chosen may depend on just how desirable, or choosy, the private company is able to be.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why SPACs Won’t Replace Traditional IPOs -- and Vice Versa</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy SPACs Won’t Replace Traditional IPOs -- and Vice Versa\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-23 23:42 GMT+8 <a href=https://www.thestreet.com/investing/why-spacs-wont-replace-traditional-ipos><strong>TheStreet</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Will SPACs replace traditional IPOs? I think to a degree, they already have -- at least for now. Longer-term, however, I think that traditional investment banking will survive, and that there will ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/why-spacs-wont-replace-traditional-ipos\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/why-spacs-wont-replace-traditional-ipos","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1102596742","content_text":"Will SPACs replace traditional IPOs? I think to a degree, they already have -- at least for now. Longer-term, however, I think that traditional investment banking will survive, and that there will always be room for both methods of going public.\nPart of why I say that traditional IPOs will survive is due to the sheer abundance of SPACs out there right now. Can they all find winning companies to merge with? What happens to those that don't find the right dance partner? Surely some will wither and die. But at the same time, the SPAC model is probably here to stay since it does simplify and expedite the whole process of going public and raising capital. And so I think that SPACs will survive even once we’re past the current manic stage.\nFirst, understand that IPOs and SPACs are really just two ways of getting a private company from point A (in need of capital) to point B (capital needs satisfied and trading publicly). As you'll see, it's really a matter of putting the wagon before the horse, or the horse before the wagon. And the same model doesn’t work for every private company in every situation.\nThe IPO\nThe traditional IPO, or Initial Public Offering, has been around since the beginning. This is what investment bankers, among other things, do for a living. As a former senior New York Stock Exchange floor trader who worked as part of the IPO team for what was considered the hottest investment bank during the internet bubble of the late 1990's, early 2000's, I have a great deal of experience in both supporting and in running the execution end of traditional IPOs, either from the booth, or in the crowd at the point of sale.\nIn simplified form, IPOs involve private companies working with an investment bank or several investment banks to raise capital by “going public.\" The investment banks place a value on the private firm through a strenuous level of fundamental analysis, all the while gauging or trying to drum up demand. That part of the job is often referred to as a \"road show.\"\nThe private company must also register with the exchange where it plans to list, as well as the Securities and Exchange Commission. There is a lengthy process that must be followed, as well as numerous requirements, such as compliance around transparency in financial reporting, that must be met.\nThe investment bank or banks, also known as the underwriters, may guarantee the IPO by purchasing the offering in a firm commitment and then selling the shares themselves in the secondary market. Without this \"firm\" commitment, the IPO is considered to be a \"best effort\" agreement, in which the underwriter sells the shares with no guarantee.\nIn my experience, the vast majority of IPOs are indeed “firm commitments” in which the underwriter takes on either the profit or loss (the risk) when selling shares after having priced the IPO. In the case of a \"best effort'' IPO, the investment bank is really more like a broker and advisor than a trader, and passes on to the formerly private company's shareholders the proceeds of those initial sales.\nThe SPAC\nThe SPAC, or Special Purpose Acquisition Company, has become increasingly popular lately. Some of you may have heard of \"Blank Check Companies.\" This is another term for basically the same thing as a SPAC. The whole idea is simply to raise funds first and then target private companies to merge with afterwards.\nIn this way, the private firm is able to get in position to quickly merge with an already-public company, greatly simplifying the process of going public. At that point, the shareholders or owners of the private company can either redeem their stakes at the offering price, or accept stock in the newly-merged company, depending on their preference.\nWhy would a private company choose this route over a traditional IPO? There are several good reasons. The first is speed to market. By foregoing the whole \"road show\" process and merging with an already public firm, the company can now bypass all of the registrations and regulatory requirements. In addition, the risk of allowing investment bankers to price the deal is removed once the merger is agreed to.\nWhat makes SPACs so attractive to private companies that might be in need of capital? It’s pretty simple --in a traditional IPO, the private company chases the capital, but with a SPAC, the capital chases the private company.\nNotably, the SPAC structure is less risky to the owners of the targeted private company. The private company negotiates and agrees to a deal. Their work is now done, and the risk is transferred to the SPAC. This is great -- if you happen to run a highly sought-after private company in a suddenly hot industry. That is another reason why speed matters. No one ever knows how long the iron (or industry) stays hot.\nNow, for the less highly sought-after private business, there will always be a need for a traditional investment banker since these companies still need to raise capital and will need help finding investors. However, in the IPO model, the workload and the risk are more on the private company than they are on the bank -- at least until the issue is priced and regardless of whether a firm commitment has been made.\nThe Bottom Line\nIn my opinion, there will always be room in this marketplace for both traditional investment bankers as well as SPACs. For now, amid a pandemic, which has largely taken the \"road show\" aspect out of the IPO, and as certain industries have taken off seemingly overnight, SPACs have taken as much as half of the market for new issues.\nThat is the current environment and it is not only subject to change, itwillchange. As some SPACs fail to attract potentially hot new private companies, their ranks will thin. In a market that’s tougher than the current bull one, raising money ahead of a deal becomes more difficult, and the pendulum will swing back toward traditional investment bankers who provide access to a broader array of potential investors.\nThat said, these are two ways of going about doing the same thing. Neither is going away. Quality will succeed where success is deserved, and so quality investment bankers will outperform lower-quality SPACs and vice versa. Where quality is less obvious, there will be failure to last, or to find the right dance partner. The route chosen may depend on just how desirable, or choosy, the private company is able to be.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".SPX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1331,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"defaultTab":"posts","isTTM":true}