Profile - To The Moon

lupe

Posts · 4Posts · 4
Following · 0Following · 0
Followers · 0Followers · 0

- lupelupe
  ·2021-09-08
  nice
  Hong Kong watchdog still watching IPO sponsor banks, has several open cases
  HONG KONG, Sept 8 (Reuters) - Hong Kong's markets watchdog expects to penalise more brokers for misc
  Hong Kong watchdog still watching IPO sponsor banks, has several open cases
  1.03K 4
  8
  Share
  Report
- lupelupe
  ·2021-09-08
  wow
  Sorry, this post has been deleted
  463 Comment
  5
  Share
  Report
- lupelupe
  ·2021-09-07
  nice
  Sorry, this post has been deleted
  571 Comment
  1
  Share
  Report
- lupelupe
  ·2021-09-05
  nic
  Boeing’s Delivery of New 787 Dreamliners Likely Delayed Until at Least Late October
  FAA rejected plane maker’s recent inspection proposal; customers may get chance to redo orders as ha
  Boeing’s Delivery of New 787 Dreamliners Likely Delayed Until at Least Late October
  743 1
  7
  Share
  Report

抱歉，当前请求异常(-1)

Terms and Conditions·Privacy Policy

Company: TTMF Limited. Tech supported by Xiangshang Yixin.

Email：uservice@ttm.financial

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"isCurrentUser":false,"userPageInfo":{"id":"4093403835853240","uuid":"4093403835853240","gmtCreate":1630300771060,"gmtModify":1634349872005,"name":"lupe","pinyin":"lupe","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/573d7abef4f13f60d58b7497555cfb57","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":1,"headSize":30,"tweetSize":4,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.29","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":1,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"page":1,"watchlist":null,"tweetList":[{"id":889016700,"gmtCreate":1631090800400,"gmtModify":1676530465053,"author":{"id":"4093403835853240","authorId":"4093403835853240","name":"lupe","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/573d7abef4f13f60d58b7497555cfb57","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4093403835853240","authorIdStr":"4093403835853240"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"nice","listText":"nice","text":"nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/889016700","repostId":"2165362935","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2165362935","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1631090286,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2165362935?lang=&edition=full_marsco","pubTime":"2021-09-08 16:38","market":"sh","language":"en","title":"Hong Kong watchdog still watching IPO sponsor banks, has several open cases","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2165362935","media":"Reuters","summary":"HONG KONG, Sept 8 (Reuters) - Hong Kong's markets watchdog expects to penalise more brokers for misc","content":"<p>HONG KONG, Sept 8 (Reuters) - Hong Kong's markets watchdog expects to penalise more brokers for misconduct over listings in the financial hub, particularly smaller firms, its enforcement director said on Wednesday, despite some large fines levied recently.</p>\n<p>The fines for high-profile firms, such as UBS and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSTLW\">Morgan Stanley</a>, were part of a long-running campaign to improve listing standards after newly traded firms were hit by a slew of scandals.</p>\n<p>\"We have a number of open cases that will definitely end up in enforcement action,\" said Tom Atkinson of the city's Securities and Futures Commission.</p>\n<p>\"I think the enforcement actions we’ve taken have done a lot to change behavior with the large firms ... but there are still the smaller firms,\" he said at a conference organised by the Asia Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association.</p>\n<p>In 2019, the regulator suspended for 10 months&nbsp;UBS's licence to sponsor IPOs, besides fining it and Morgan Stanley&nbsp;among others, $100 million for failings in due diligence regarding three initial public offerings.</p>\n<p>Hong Kong IPOs need at least <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> sponsoring bank that typically takes the lead in running the IPO and is responsible for performing due diligence to assess the company being listed and assure investors that its IPO prospectus is accurate.</p>\n<p>(Reporting by Alun John; Editing by Clarence Fernandez)</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Hong Kong watchdog still watching IPO sponsor banks, has several open cases</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHong Kong watchdog still watching IPO sponsor banks, has several open cases\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-09-08 16:38</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>HONG KONG, Sept 8 (Reuters) - Hong Kong's markets watchdog expects to penalise more brokers for misconduct over listings in the financial hub, particularly smaller firms, its enforcement director said on Wednesday, despite some large fines levied recently.</p>\n<p>The fines for high-profile firms, such as UBS and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSTLW\">Morgan Stanley</a>, were part of a long-running campaign to improve listing standards after newly traded firms were hit by a slew of scandals.</p>\n<p>\"We have a number of open cases that will definitely end up in enforcement action,\" said Tom Atkinson of the city's Securities and Futures Commission.</p>\n<p>\"I think the enforcement actions we’ve taken have done a lot to change behavior with the large firms ... but there are still the smaller firms,\" he said at a conference organised by the Asia Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association.</p>\n<p>In 2019, the regulator suspended for 10 months&nbsp;UBS's licence to sponsor IPOs, besides fining it and Morgan Stanley&nbsp;among others, $100 million for failings in due diligence regarding three initial public offerings.</p>\n<p>Hong Kong IPOs need at least <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> sponsoring bank that typically takes the lead in running the IPO and is responsible for performing due diligence to assess the company being listed and assure investors that its IPO prospectus is accurate.</p>\n<p>(Reporting by Alun John; Editing by Clarence Fernandez)</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"00388":"香港交易所","HSI":"恒生指数","MS":"摩根士丹利"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2165362935","content_text":"HONG KONG, Sept 8 (Reuters) - Hong Kong's markets watchdog expects to penalise more brokers for misconduct over listings in the financial hub, particularly smaller firms, its enforcement director said on Wednesday, despite some large fines levied recently.\nThe fines for high-profile firms, such as UBS and Morgan Stanley, were part of a long-running campaign to improve listing standards after newly traded firms were hit by a slew of scandals.\n\"We have a number of open cases that will definitely end up in enforcement action,\" said Tom Atkinson of the city's Securities and Futures Commission.\n\"I think the enforcement actions we’ve taken have done a lot to change behavior with the large firms ... but there are still the smaller firms,\" he said at a conference organised by the Asia Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association.\nIn 2019, the regulator suspended for 10 months UBS's licence to sponsor IPOs, besides fining it and Morgan Stanley among others, $100 million for failings in due diligence regarding three initial public offerings.\nHong Kong IPOs need at least one sponsoring bank that typically takes the lead in running the IPO and is responsible for performing due diligence to assess the company being listed and assure investors that its IPO prospectus is accurate.\n(Reporting by Alun John; Editing by Clarence Fernandez)","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1030,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":889016264,"gmtCreate":1631090778658,"gmtModify":1676530465044,"author":{"id":"4093403835853240","authorId":"4093403835853240","name":"lupe","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/573d7abef4f13f60d58b7497555cfb57","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4093403835853240","authorIdStr":"4093403835853240"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"wow","listText":"wow","text":"wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/889016264","repostId":"2165362935","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":463,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":880911696,"gmtCreate":1631008054315,"gmtModify":1676530440965,"author":{"id":"4093403835853240","authorId":"4093403835853240","name":"lupe","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/573d7abef4f13f60d58b7497555cfb57","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4093403835853240","authorIdStr":"4093403835853240"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"nice","listText":"nice","text":"nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/880911696","repostId":"2165880909","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":571,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":814799903,"gmtCreate":1630883908902,"gmtModify":1676530409192,"author":{"id":"4093403835853240","authorId":"4093403835853240","name":"lupe","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/573d7abef4f13f60d58b7497555cfb57","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4093403835853240","authorIdStr":"4093403835853240"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"nic","listText":"nic","text":"nic","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/814799903","repostId":"1196127212","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1196127212","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1630883794,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1196127212?lang=&edition=full_marsco","pubTime":"2021-09-06 07:16","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Boeing’s Delivery of New 787 Dreamliners Likely Delayed Until at Least Late October","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1196127212","media":"The Wall Street Journal","summary":"FAA rejected plane maker’s recent inspection proposal; customers may get chance to redo orders as ha","content":"<p>FAA rejected plane maker’s recent inspection proposal; customers may get chance to redo orders as halt lingers</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/29b75e36468dd4bd2db9c77904b7f801\" tg-width=\"1290\" tg-height=\"859\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Boeing first paused 787 Dreamliner deliveries in October 2020, and about 100 completed aircraft awaited delivery at the end of June, worth more than $25 billion.</span></p>\n<p>Deliveries of&nbsp;Boeing&nbsp;Co.’s 787 Dreamliner will likely remain halted until at least late October as the plane maker has been unable to persuade air-safety regulators to approve its proposal to inspect the aircraft, people familiar with the matter said.</p>\n<p>With almost all deliveries paused for nearly a year, airlines and other Boeing customers increasingly are able to use the delay to walk away from deliveries or negotiate for concessions from the aerospace giant. Deliveries were first halted because the company and the Federal Aviation Administration began taking a deeper look at&nbsp;the plane’s manufacturing defects. The holdup has choked off an important source of cash for Boeing and complicated plans for airlines.</p>\n<p>The impasse has kept Boeing from moving more than $25 billion worth of Dreamliners. Boeing said it had about 100 of the jets in its inventory awaiting delivery at the end of June. List prices for Dreamliners start around $250 million, but customers typically pay about half that after customary discounts. First delivered in 2011, the Dreamliner has had an excellent safety record and the in-service fleet has seen heavy use during the pandemic.</p>\n<p>At an Aug. 2 meeting, Boeing’s quality-assurance specialists told their FAA counterparts that three aircraft were representative of how Boeing workers put together 106 completed aircraft awaiting delivery, the people familiar with the matter said. It was part of a broader, monthslong effort to persuade the agency to&nbsp;approve an inspection method&nbsp;that would speed deliveries with targeted checks rather than nose-to-tail teardowns.</p>\n<p>However, at least one other Boeing engineer told the regulator he didn’t support that assessment, these people said. He disagreed that the trio of planes reflected how the rest of the undelivered planes were built. The engineer is among a group of Boeing employees who represent the FAA internally at the company, one of these people said.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/19a1f36f4c024e20ea0bb4860ad7278a\" tg-width=\"1050\" tg-height=\"700\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Boeing’s plant in Everett, Wash. The company and air-safety regulators remain at odds over how the 787 Dreamliner will be inspected.</span></p>\n<p>The subset of three planes had recently rolled off the assembly line close together, people familiar with the matter said. The Boeing quality-assurance team chose the three jets because they were readily available for inspection in the factory, and the team determined they had undergone the same production process as the other aircraft, one of these people said.</p>\n<p>After the Aug. 2 presentation, the FAA flagged internal company disagreements over the aircraft sample size and restated its requirement that Boeing’s employee group that acts as in-house regulators need to also concur with the company’s proposals, people familiar with the matter said. The company agreed to get a signoff from the employee group, the people said. Boeing also agreed to broaden the sample size to about 10 aircraft, one of these people said.</p>\n<p>A Boeing spokesman said the company was committed to working with full transparency with regulators through a rigorous process that has already involved hundreds of hours of meetings and working sessions. He said the company appreciated the FAA’s direction and feedback.</p>\n<p>“Boeing wants and expects our teammates to speak freely, ask questions and present different perspectives about very complex and technical issues,” the spokesman said.</p>\n<p>An FAA spokeswoman said the agency won’t sign off on Boeing’s inspections “until our safety experts are satisfied.”</p>\n<p>As the delivery halt continues, Boeing faces increasing financial exposure as a growing number of deliveries become delayed by a year or more. Aircraft buyers can generally walk away—without financial penalty—under the so-called 12-month rule typically included in purchasing agreements. Aviation data provider Ascend by Cirium estimates that 54, or about half, of the Dreamliners in Boeing’s inventory could be at risk by Oct. 1.</p>\n<p>So far, Avolon Holdings Ltd. has canceled two of its Dreamliners awaiting delivery, according to the aviation data provider. The aircraft lessor has threatened to cancel three other 787 deliveries as it negotiates with Boeing, people familiar with the matter said.</p>\n<p>American Airlines Group Inc.&nbsp;is considering using its contractual leverage to cancel some of its Dreamliner deliveries, people familiar with the matter said. The carrier had expected Boeing to deliver 11 of the jets by the end of the year, according to a July securities filing.</p>\n<p>The Boeing spokesman said addressing Dreamliner quality issues was the right course of action despite a near-term impact to operations. He said the plane maker will continue to “take the time necessary to ensure we meet the highest standards.”</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/efc03311f6d3a32824e4c6cf5d4bd5f6\" tg-width=\"1050\" tg-height=\"700\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Boeing and the FAA halted deliveries of 787 Dreamliners to take a deeper look at the plane’s manufacturing defects. An American Airlines Dreamliner landing in Amsterdam last April.</span></p>\n<p>The FAA’s reaction to the Aug. 2 Boeing presentation is an example of the scrutiny that the Chicago-based aerospace giant is facing from its primary regulator following two 737 MAX crashes. The FAA kept that aircraft grounded for nearly two years after&nbsp;two of those jets crashed and killed 346 people&nbsp;in late 2018 and early 2019. U.S. lawmakers and others criticized the agency’s oversight of Boeing during that plane’s development and for failing to take drastic action to prevent the second crash. The FAA is also&nbsp;closely scrutinizing Boeing’s newest jet, the 777X, and detailed earlier this year how that plane wasn’t ready for key safety approvals.</p>\n<p>The FAA last year launched a broad review of how Boeing produces the Dreamliner, and inspections in the months since have found additional defects on the plane. The Aug. 2 meeting centered on areas surrounding passenger and cargo doors. The broader 787 inspection proposal is complex and involves a mix of physical inspections and data analysis related to multiple sections of the aircraft.</p>\n<p>After pausing deliveries in October 2020, Boeing had&nbsp;restarted handing over the planes&nbsp;to customers for two months this past March, but again&nbsp;stopped in May when the FAA demanded more data&nbsp;about Dreamliner inspections.</p>\n<p>At FAA headquarters, senior officials have been encouraged by Boeing promptly alerting the agency to newly discovered quality issues with the 787, people familiar with the agency’s discussions said. A recent example came earlier this summer when Boeing notified regulators of a defect that&nbsp;prompted Boeing to slow production&nbsp;so workers could fix the aircraft. Additional defects have since been identified, people familiar with the matter said.</p>\n<p>However, regulators have also at times been frustrated by a perception that Boeing wants the agency to rubber-stamp its proposals without seeing its engineers’ homework, people familiar with the matter said.</p>\n<p>Boeing Chief Executive David Calhoun has said the company wouldn’t pressure the agency to move faster, adding the FAA rightfully wants more information about proposed inspections. “It would be unfair of us to shove it down the FAA’s throat,” he said in June.</p>\n<p>The recent Dreamliner quality issues emerged in summer last year. Boeing&nbsp;voluntarily grounded eight of the aircraft&nbsp;after engineers determined that two defects in the same location could pose a potential hazard in extreme flying conditions. Engineers determined the issues by themselves don’t pose immediate safety risks, but could result in premature fatigue and pose structural issues earlier than anticipated. The defects generally are related to tiny gaps where sections of the aircraft are joined together.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Boeing’s Delivery of New 787 Dreamliners Likely Delayed Until at Least Late October</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBoeing’s Delivery of New 787 Dreamliners Likely Delayed Until at Least Late October\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-06 07:16 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.wsj.com/articles/boeings-delivery-of-new-787-dreamliners-likely-delayed-until-at-least-late-october-11630783728?mod=searchresults_pos2&page=1><strong>The Wall Street Journal</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>FAA rejected plane maker’s recent inspection proposal; customers may get chance to redo orders as halt lingers\nBoeing first paused 787 Dreamliner deliveries in October 2020, and about 100 completed ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.wsj.com/articles/boeings-delivery-of-new-787-dreamliners-likely-delayed-until-at-least-late-october-11630783728?mod=searchresults_pos2&page=1\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BA":"波音"},"source_url":"https://www.wsj.com/articles/boeings-delivery-of-new-787-dreamliners-likely-delayed-until-at-least-late-october-11630783728?mod=searchresults_pos2&page=1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1196127212","content_text":"FAA rejected plane maker’s recent inspection proposal; customers may get chance to redo orders as halt lingers\nBoeing first paused 787 Dreamliner deliveries in October 2020, and about 100 completed aircraft awaited delivery at the end of June, worth more than $25 billion.\nDeliveries of Boeing Co.’s 787 Dreamliner will likely remain halted until at least late October as the plane maker has been unable to persuade air-safety regulators to approve its proposal to inspect the aircraft, people familiar with the matter said.\nWith almost all deliveries paused for nearly a year, airlines and other Boeing customers increasingly are able to use the delay to walk away from deliveries or negotiate for concessions from the aerospace giant. Deliveries were first halted because the company and the Federal Aviation Administration began taking a deeper look at the plane’s manufacturing defects. The holdup has choked off an important source of cash for Boeing and complicated plans for airlines.\nThe impasse has kept Boeing from moving more than $25 billion worth of Dreamliners. Boeing said it had about 100 of the jets in its inventory awaiting delivery at the end of June. List prices for Dreamliners start around $250 million, but customers typically pay about half that after customary discounts. First delivered in 2011, the Dreamliner has had an excellent safety record and the in-service fleet has seen heavy use during the pandemic.\nAt an Aug. 2 meeting, Boeing’s quality-assurance specialists told their FAA counterparts that three aircraft were representative of how Boeing workers put together 106 completed aircraft awaiting delivery, the people familiar with the matter said. It was part of a broader, monthslong effort to persuade the agency to approve an inspection method that would speed deliveries with targeted checks rather than nose-to-tail teardowns.\nHowever, at least one other Boeing engineer told the regulator he didn’t support that assessment, these people said. He disagreed that the trio of planes reflected how the rest of the undelivered planes were built. The engineer is among a group of Boeing employees who represent the FAA internally at the company, one of these people said.\nBoeing’s plant in Everett, Wash. The company and air-safety regulators remain at odds over how the 787 Dreamliner will be inspected.\nThe subset of three planes had recently rolled off the assembly line close together, people familiar with the matter said. The Boeing quality-assurance team chose the three jets because they were readily available for inspection in the factory, and the team determined they had undergone the same production process as the other aircraft, one of these people said.\nAfter the Aug. 2 presentation, the FAA flagged internal company disagreements over the aircraft sample size and restated its requirement that Boeing’s employee group that acts as in-house regulators need to also concur with the company’s proposals, people familiar with the matter said. The company agreed to get a signoff from the employee group, the people said. Boeing also agreed to broaden the sample size to about 10 aircraft, one of these people said.\nA Boeing spokesman said the company was committed to working with full transparency with regulators through a rigorous process that has already involved hundreds of hours of meetings and working sessions. He said the company appreciated the FAA’s direction and feedback.\n“Boeing wants and expects our teammates to speak freely, ask questions and present different perspectives about very complex and technical issues,” the spokesman said.\nAn FAA spokeswoman said the agency won’t sign off on Boeing’s inspections “until our safety experts are satisfied.”\nAs the delivery halt continues, Boeing faces increasing financial exposure as a growing number of deliveries become delayed by a year or more. Aircraft buyers can generally walk away—without financial penalty—under the so-called 12-month rule typically included in purchasing agreements. Aviation data provider Ascend by Cirium estimates that 54, or about half, of the Dreamliners in Boeing’s inventory could be at risk by Oct. 1.\nSo far, Avolon Holdings Ltd. has canceled two of its Dreamliners awaiting delivery, according to the aviation data provider. The aircraft lessor has threatened to cancel three other 787 deliveries as it negotiates with Boeing, people familiar with the matter said.\nAmerican Airlines Group Inc. is considering using its contractual leverage to cancel some of its Dreamliner deliveries, people familiar with the matter said. The carrier had expected Boeing to deliver 11 of the jets by the end of the year, according to a July securities filing.\nThe Boeing spokesman said addressing Dreamliner quality issues was the right course of action despite a near-term impact to operations. He said the plane maker will continue to “take the time necessary to ensure we meet the highest standards.”\nBoeing and the FAA halted deliveries of 787 Dreamliners to take a deeper look at the plane’s manufacturing defects. An American Airlines Dreamliner landing in Amsterdam last April.\nThe FAA’s reaction to the Aug. 2 Boeing presentation is an example of the scrutiny that the Chicago-based aerospace giant is facing from its primary regulator following two 737 MAX crashes. The FAA kept that aircraft grounded for nearly two years after two of those jets crashed and killed 346 people in late 2018 and early 2019. U.S. lawmakers and others criticized the agency’s oversight of Boeing during that plane’s development and for failing to take drastic action to prevent the second crash. The FAA is also closely scrutinizing Boeing’s newest jet, the 777X, and detailed earlier this year how that plane wasn’t ready for key safety approvals.\nThe FAA last year launched a broad review of how Boeing produces the Dreamliner, and inspections in the months since have found additional defects on the plane. The Aug. 2 meeting centered on areas surrounding passenger and cargo doors. The broader 787 inspection proposal is complex and involves a mix of physical inspections and data analysis related to multiple sections of the aircraft.\nAfter pausing deliveries in October 2020, Boeing had restarted handing over the planes to customers for two months this past March, but again stopped in May when the FAA demanded more data about Dreamliner inspections.\nAt FAA headquarters, senior officials have been encouraged by Boeing promptly alerting the agency to newly discovered quality issues with the 787, people familiar with the agency’s discussions said. A recent example came earlier this summer when Boeing notified regulators of a defect that prompted Boeing to slow production so workers could fix the aircraft. Additional defects have since been identified, people familiar with the matter said.\nHowever, regulators have also at times been frustrated by a perception that Boeing wants the agency to rubber-stamp its proposals without seeing its engineers’ homework, people familiar with the matter said.\nBoeing Chief Executive David Calhoun has said the company wouldn’t pressure the agency to move faster, adding the FAA rightfully wants more information about proposed inspections. “It would be unfair of us to shove it down the FAA’s throat,” he said in June.\nThe recent Dreamliner quality issues emerged in summer last year. Boeing voluntarily grounded eight of the aircraft after engineers determined that two defects in the same location could pose a potential hazard in extreme flying conditions. Engineers determined the issues by themselves don’t pose immediate safety risks, but could result in premature fatigue and pose structural issues earlier than anticipated. The defects generally are related to tiny gaps where sections of the aircraft are joined together.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":743,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"defaultTab":"posts","isTTM":true}