To The Moon

$Intel(INTC)$

Intel’s Market Position: A Rough Patch with Renewed Interest

Hey, welcome back! Intel has had a tough few years, but market interest is picking up, largely due to the company's fundamental value. Let’s take a closer look. While most metrics are down, Q4 performed better than expected. However, the outlook for Q1 is weak. That said, a single quarter doesn’t mean much—companies sometimes lower guidance intentionally to create positive surprises later. Although it’s regulated, there’s flexibility in how it's done.

Intel’s Financial Strength and Investment Strategy

Personally, I’m bullish on Intel and own a small stake, but keep in mind that my views are general. Intel once boasted strong margins, even above the industry average, but they’ve now turned negative. However, we’re seeing some improvements. The biggest factor weighing on Intel—and also its potential savior—is the massive investment cycle in Intel Foundry. Without this, Intel might have remained stagnant, gradually declining due to competition. The company projects operational break-even for the foundry business by the end of 2027, meaning this could be a medium-term challenge rather than a long-term issue. Without the investment cycle, Intel would likely have generated around $13 billion even in a tough market—still a solid figure.

Competitive Challenges and Business Shift

Despite being a market leader in many areas, Intel has lagged behind Nvidia and, in some cases, AMD in both technology and price-to-performance. Pivoting from a losing battle into a high-potential market and new business model could be a smart move—but more on that in a bit. Right now, Intel isn’t profitable because of its heavy investment cycle. Cash flow is negative, but historically, it generated $10-12 billion annually, meaning that at today’s valuation, it would be trading at a ratio of around 10. The environment is different now, of course, but the core business remains strong.

Massive CAPEX and Strategic Growth Plans

Over the past five years, Intel has spent more than $20 billion annually on CAPEX, despite recent efforts to slow down. This is part of its strategy to become the second-largest chip manufacturer after TSMC by 2030. The company has received substantial government support, and with the push to bring key tech back to the U.S., political factors could play a role. There have been media reports suggesting TSMC could operate Intel’s fabs, but don’t forget what the "T" in TSMC stands for—it’s not an American company. While other options exist, the country’s reliance on Taiwan would remain unchanged, and politics are unpredictable—not to mention whether TSMC would even be interested.

Recovery Prospects and Cost-Cutting Measures

Intel expects some recovery in Q2, Q3, and Q4 and has planned CAPEX reductions for a more measured approach. Depending on timing and market conditions, cash flow could turn positive relatively soon. Even now, with normal CAPEX levels, Intel is still profitable. The challenge is ensuring enough funding to complete projects. Significant contributions from partners are expected in 2024, but cutting costs too aggressively could delay profitability.

Financial Position and Potential Risks

Financially, Intel is in an okay position—current assets cover liabilities, though there is considerable debt. However, its physical assets are worth more than twice its debt, so in an extreme scenario, the company could spin off assets if necessary. What’s particularly striking is that the company’s equity was recently about equal to its market cap—before the 16% jump in stock price. Intel has a good amount of cash and a stable financial position, but the market is concerned about negative net income and cash flow. However, its R&D and CAPEX spending are on par with Nvidia, AMD, and even Palantir combined.

Intel’s Unique Advantage: Physical Assets and Geopolitical Influence

One key advantage Intel has is its massive physical assets. Unlike patents and technology that can quickly become outdated, Intel's fabs are essential for the semiconductor industry, which is dominated by fabless companies. Beyond that, Intel’s geopolitical significance and political influence make it an attractive player. As I’ve shown in past videos, the CEO has met with key leaders across the U.S., Germany, and other major economies, attending high-level events. Imagine if AMD or Nvidia had that kind of influence on top of their existing strengths.

Leadership Change and Market Reactions

A major catalyst for the recent stock movement was the CEO’s resignation. He had strong government ties and, along with the CFO, led the Foundry investment strategy that put Intel in its current situation. The idea of creating a strong American and European alternative to TSMC was strategic, but the execution may have been rushed, and market conditions were unfavorable. Debt has increased by around 60% since 2019, nearly doubling since 2018. Intel also cut its dividend by 65% before suspending it entirely, which the market didn’t take well. Intel was previously seen as a reliable dividend stock, and cutting payouts while shifting from buybacks to issuing shares lost them a key financial tool.

Market Sentiment and Execution Issues

Had Intel communicated a clearer plan from the start—perhaps issuing 5% new stock annually, adjusting dividends more gradually, and implementing cost-saving measures—the market reaction might have been different. Instead, their approach was abrupt: a massive investment plan, sharp declines in cash flow and net income, and major layoffs (15,000 employees), all announced at once. They aim to save $10 billion by 2025, but the execution felt reactive rather than strategic.

Future Risks and the Role of New Management

A risk going forward is whether new leadership might abandon the Foundry strategy, selling projects at a loss to refocus on competing directly with Nvidia and AMD. That could be disastrous, as Intel is already at a disadvantage there. From a geopolitical standpoint, the current plan is highly beneficial. However, the semiconductor market remains intensely competitive, and chips are increasingly commoditized, making the business highly volatile. If Intel completes its projects during a downturn in semiconductor demand, faces difficulties securing customers, or struggles with debt repayments, it could run into trouble.

Intel ($INTC) Stock Valuation & Final Thoughts

Bearish Scenario: Worst-Case Valuation

In a pessimistic scenario, let’s assume Intel invests $100-200 billion, yet the business only generates $10 billion in annual earnings. This would indicate poor returns and weak margins. If the stock trades at a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 7—far below the industry average of 40-50—it would imply a $70 billion market cap. That translates to a stock price of $16.22, reflecting a substantial loss, similar to the lows seen recently. If this scenario plays out over the next five years, additional stock dilution could push the price even lower. However, given Intel’s high-value assets, including state-of-the-art foundries, a potential acquisition could still be on the table, as the equity value might exceed double this market cap.

Moderate Scenario: A Reasonable Recovery

In a more balanced scenario, Intel achieves $15 billion in annual earnings, a modest $5 billion increase over its historical levels. Given the industry landscape, a conservative P/E ratio of 10—still below Intel’s average—would result in a $150 billion market cap. That equates to a stock price of $34.75, offering solid gains from recent lows. If Intel resumes dividends and buybacks, a combined 10% yield could further enhance returns, making it an attractive income investment.

Bullish Scenario: Strong Growth Potential

A more optimistic, yet still reasonable scenario would see Intel reaching $20 billion in annual earnings. At a P/E ratio of 15—historically on the higher end for Intel but not unprecedented—the market cap would hit $300 billion, implying a stock price of $69.51. This would be a 3x return from current levels, not including potential dividends and buybacks. Interestingly, this valuation aligns with Intel’s stock peak from half a decade ago, suggesting it's not an extreme stretch. If market sentiment shifts, valuation multiples expand, or earnings significantly exceed expectations, Intel could even become a 10-bagger. While unlikely, the potential remains if the company executes well.

Conclusion: A Value Play with Upside

At its current price, Intel presents a compelling value investment. While I hold a relatively small position (less than 1% of my portfolio), $21 and consider anything below that an attractive risk-reward opportunity. The company maintains a solid balance sheet and has enough cash to operate at a loss for a few years—likely enough time to complete its investment cycle and return to positive cash flow.

Additionally, the possibility of an acquisition or strategic partnership further strengthens Intel’s margin of safety. Even if it lags in technology, its manufacturing assets remain critical to the industry. While better communication from management could have softened the stock’s decline, the drop created a buying opportunity. Unlike high-growth competitors that require 30-40% annual expansion to justify valuations, Intel’s story is different. It doesn’t need hypergrowth—just successful execution.

For long-term investors, Intel remains a company worth watching If Intel not the next Boooeing!

Disclaimer: I want to make it clear that I am not a financial advisor, and nothing I say is intended to be a recommendation to buy or sell any financial instrument. Additionally, it's important to remember that there are no guarantees or certainties in trading or investing, and you should never invest money that you can't afford to lose.

@Daily_Discussion @TigerPM @TigerObserver @Tiger_comments @TigerClub