HOW AMD COULD STILL WIN THE AI RACE
$Advanced Micro Devices(AMD)$ The market doesn’t care about potential anymore. It’s not pricing vision, ambition, or a roadmap full of what-ifs. It’s pricing execution. And right now, AMD isn’t executing -- not where it matters. Not in data center. Not in AI. Not at scale.
We’re past the point of giving credit for adjacency. This isn’t 2021, where throwing around “AI” in an earnings call earned you a premium multiple. The hype has matured. The narrative has narrowed. Now it’s about infrastructure. Ecosystem. Dominance. $NVDA isn’t just leading this market -- it’s defining it. And AMD, for all the talk, is still stuck in the preamble.
If AI demand were truly diversifying away from Nvidia, we’d feel it in AMD’s numbers. But their latest report gave us the opposite. $3.9B in data center revenue when expectations were at $4.2B -- during the peak of an AI capex boom. That’s not a small miss. That’s a structural signal. MI300X might be talked about like it’s a contender, but the market isn’t treating it like one. Because one deployment with $MSFT doesn’t make a platform. It makes a case study. And right now, AMD doesn’t need validation -- it needs velocity.
And velocity doesn’t come from hardware alone.
Because in AI infrastructure, hardware is table stakes. The battleground isn’t just chip specs. It’s not who has the fastest FLOPs or the tightest node. It’s who owns the stack. And on that front, Nvidia is untouchable. CUDA isn’t a feature. It’s the operating system of modern AI. It’s the backbone of every framework, every optimization, every deployment pipeline built over the past decade. It’s embedded in the very muscle memory of AI development.
AMD’s answer -- ROCm -- doesn’t meet the moment. It exists, sure. But existence isn’t enough. ROCm doesn’t pull. It doesn’t attract. It doesn’t compel developers to rebuild around it. It lacks the polish, the community, the tight integration that makes CUDA not just dominant but indispensable. Even when ROCm works, it often works differently, which in software terms means friction. And friction kills scale.
You can’t sell scale when you make every customer build from scratch.
And that’s the fatal flaw in AMD’s AI story. They’re trying to sell hardware in a market that already chose its software. They’re trying to play catch-up in a race where second place isn’t just behind -- it’s irrelevant. Because $GOOGL, $META, $MSFT & $AMZN don’t build infrastructure around contenders. They build around commitments. Around roadmaps they trust. Around ecosystems they don’t have to think about. That’s what Nvidia delivers. That’s what AMD hasn’t.
And the market knows it. Look at the margins. Nvidia’s margins keep climbing with every generation -- not just because the chips are better, but because the platform is deeper. AMD’s margins? Flat. 54%. No pricing power. No leverage. No sign that AI is shifting the product mix. Because without the ecosystem, performance doesn’t matter. Without software leadership, hardware can’t lead.
Even outside AI, there’s no cushion left. Gaming is down. Embedded is down. Client is up, but nobody’s re-rating AMD for selling more laptops. That’s the old playbook. The new game is infrastructure. And AMD isn’t driving it.
Meanwhile, Nvidia is already playing the next hand. Blackwell is here, and Rubin is just around the corner. CUDA is evolving. Inference is scaling. Nvidia isn’t just ahead -- it’s accelerating. AMD is still trying to win the last round while Nvidia is busy defining the next one
And this isn’t the kind of market where you can afford to wait. AI infrastructure is consolidating. Hyperscaler spend is locking in. The winners are being crowned now -- not in theory, but in contracts, in integrations, in the workflows of every enterprise AI team that doesn’t have time to experiment with “the other option.”
That’s the real takeaway. AMD isn’t being punished for poor performance -- it’s being priced out in a redefinition of compute, where software defines value and platform lock-in defines leadership
And until AMD proves it can win something more than a slide in a presentation -- until ROCm becomes the default, not the workaround -- nothing else matters. Not MI300X benchmarks. Not single wins. Not conference applause. What matters is conversion. Market share. Ecosystem pull.
That’s what the market is pricing. Not the dream. The delivery. And right now, AMD isn’t delivering. If I were Lisa Su, I wouldn’t be chasing Nvidia in training -- I’d be rewriting the playbook for inference.
Because here’s the thing: the AI arms race is shifting. Training gets the headlines, but inference is where the next wave of scale, spend, and differentiation will happen. It’s not just about massive LLMs anymore — it’s about deploying them everywhere. On the edge. In real time. Across consumer apps, enterprise workflows, security systems, vehicles, devices, and autonomous infrastructure. Inference is the infrastructure layer of the new digital economy — and right now, Nvidia’s trying to lock it down before anyone else catches up.
But that door isn’t closed. Not yet.
If I were Lisa Su, I’d stop fighting to be another option for training clusters and start owning inference -- and not just in the cloud, but everywhere compute is shifting: edge servers, AI PCs, industrial robotics, retail, logistics, automotive. I’d position AMD not as a replacement for Nvidia’s dominance in training, but as the engine behind the real-time AI world we’re actually moving into.
That means building a new ROCm stack, from the ground up, optimized specifically for inference -- lightweight, modular, scalable, open. Make it so plug-and-play that startups, hyperscalers, and edge developers can deploy it in hours, not weeks. Make it so cost-efficient and power-optimized that it becomes the obvious choice for AI at the edge. Don’t just match CUDA -- bypass it. Make ROCm the Android of AI inference.
So no -- I’m not buying the story. Not because I don’t believe in the company (I really want to). But because I believe in gravity. And in this market, CUDA has it.
Image
For whom haven't open CBA can know more from below:
🏦 Open a CBA today and enjoy privileges of up to SGD 20,000 in trading limit with 0 commission. Trade SG, HK, US stocks as well as ETFs unlimitedly!
Find out more here：
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.
