THE U.S. SPACE STACK IS BEING DE-MUSKIFIED -- RKLB IS THE TOP BENEFICIARY
$Rocket Lab USA, Inc.(RKLB)$ The U.S. government didn’t set out to rely on Elon Musk. But over time, it happened -- and that concentration of risk became embedded in every layer of American space and defense infrastructure. SpaceX wasn’t just the leading launch provider. It became the only path for certain critical missions. Dragon emerged as the singular route for human transport to the ISS. Starlink became a default node in military communications. Falcon 9 controlled the cadence of national security payloads. And the system stopped diversifying -- because it didn’t have to.
But the moment Musk weaponized his leverage -- the moment Dragon contracts became a chip on the table of a political feud -- that entire house of cards collapsed in real time. Because there are two things defense and space agencies cannot tolerate: uncertainty and single-vendor dependency. And this wasn’t just a policy headache anymore. It was an operational liability that now required immediate action.
And that action has one name at the top of the list: Rocket Lab.
Not because Rocket Lab is ready to fully replace SpaceX tomorrow -- it isn’t. But because it is the only credible U.S.-based supplier that is vertically integrated, commercially proven, strategically aligned, and already inside the government trust perimeter -- with a clear path to Falcon-class redundancy.
Government officials have already begun dialing the phones. And Rocket Lab was one of the first calls. Not window-dressing. Not politics. Urgent contingency planning. Because when continuity of command is threatened -- when Dragon is politicized -- the response isn’t theoretical. It’s procurement in action. And that procurement cycle is now moving with force.
Neutron, which many dismissed as a capital-light hedge, is now a procurement priority. And every dollar of capital the government funnels to Rocket Lab will be highly accretive -- not dilutive -- because the company is already architected to scale. Rocket Lab owns and operates its entire stack: it manufactures composite launch vehicles in-house, designs and builds its own engines (Rutherford for Electron, Archimedes for Neutron), produces avionics, flight software, and guidance systems, and operates its own private launch range in New Zealand -- providing unmatched launch cadence flexibility and sovereign control.
Beyond launch, its space systems business is a key national asset in its own right -- producing fully integrated spacecraft (Photon), flight-proven components, satellite buses, solar power systems, reaction wheels, star trackers, and separation systems. These products are already embedded in classified government missions and commercial constellations alike.
This integrated ecosystem allows Rocket Lab to not just launch payloads, but to deliver end-to-end mission solutions -- from ground to orbit to on-orbit operations -- with a speed and agility few competitors can match. It’s why the company has been able to secure repeat business from U.S. Space Force, NRO, and DARPA. It’s why Neutron is being fast-tracked not simply as a launch vehicle, but as a critical pillar in a de-Muskified space architecture.
And here’s the real throughline: this isn’t a temporary adjustment. Just as U.S. trade policy has shifted from growth to leverage, U.S. space policy is shifting from efficiency to resilience. Diversification is no longer an optional procurement goal. It is a core mandate. And in that architecture, Rocket Lab moves from second-tier disruptor to first-tier strategic partner.
Every conversation about de-Muskification -- in Congress, in the Pentagon, at NASA -- now carries procurement urgency. Because the U.S. government cannot risk another Dragon event. It cannot risk another Starlink entanglement. And it cannot afford to wait for political stability to restore trust in Musk-controlled systems. The shift is happening now -- and Rocket Lab is perfectly positioned to capture it.
Most of the market still doesn’t see this. They still argue over Neutron specs or debate Falcon 9 superiority. But they’re missing the real driver: procurement isn’t waiting for perfect parity. It is building a redundant stack -- now -- and Rocket Lab’s architecture, trust profile, and execution readiness put it at the center of that rebuild.
That’s why I believe Rocket Lab is, by far, the single biggest beneficiary of the Musk-Trump feud -- because it is structurally aligned with the new procurement reality. And that reality isn’t going away.
This isn’t a temporary rotation of contracts. It is a forced architectural rebalancing of the U.S. space and defense stack. And Rocket Lab is about to become indispensable to it.
Image
For whom haven't open CBA can know more from below:
🏦 Open a CBA today and enjoy privileges of up to SGD 20,000 in trading limit with 0 commission. Trade SG, HK, US stocks as well as ETFs unlimitedly!
Find out more here：
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.
