$Palantir Technologies Inc.(PLTR)$ $NVIDIA(NVDA)$ $CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.(CRWD)$ 🤖🚀⚡ Palantir’s Valuation Vortex: Speculation, Strategy, and the Shape of Smart Power ⚡🚀🤖
🧠 Market Context
We’ve just survived the most volatile six-month stretch in retail market history, and Palantir wasn’t just along for the ride, it was the ride. $6.6T in retail churn: tariffs, tanks, and tech hysteria. I traded it through every storm.
Palantir ($PLTR) became a mirror to the market’s psyche in 2025: geopolitical anxiety, AI speculation, and liquidity rotation all converged into one ticker. With wars dragging on, tariffs backfiring, and U.S. politics fraying at the seams, $PLTR drew both panic sellers and euphoric chasers. And somehow, it’s still holding near the highs.
🌍 Macro Whiplash, Narrative Reversal
Back in April, the White House dropped fresh tariffs on AI-enabling tech, sparking global retaliation. That spooked everything, from chips to cloud. Yet just weeks later, we got behind-the-scenes diplomacy: backchannels with China, bilateral easing with the U.K., and soft rhetoric from key cabinet voices.
The result? A sudden shift in capital flow. Defensive AI names with sticky government exposure, like Palantir, got bid hard again. That timing wasn’t random. $PLTR sits at the intersection of defence budgets, sovereign AI infrastructure, and commercial digital transformation. In 2025, that intersection is where the money flows.
📊 Momentum, Trend, and Swing Convergence
Price closed at $134.36 on 03Jul25, riding just above the 10-week SMA ($129.37) and the 21-day EMA ($133.49), while the 50-day ($137.42) remains overhead. We’re sitting in a consolidation wedge. The 5-day swing model shows:
• Risk Trigger: $147.25, with 72.88% hit rate
• Lower Band: $121.47, with 88.99% support probability
Momentum score rebounded to 4 out of 5 after dropping to 1 at the end of June. Weekly RSI6 sits at 64.28, still healthy, and MACD lines are tightening with a histogram flattening; classic pre-breakout tension. Unless $129 breaks with conviction, this remains a bullish structure.
📈 Fundamentals vs Fantasy
Palantir’s Q1 revenue hit $884M, with $487M from government and $397M from commercial. U.S. commercial revenue jumped 71% YoY. The global picture still lags, as European commercial rose only 33%, but that’s where the upside lies.
Then there’s the TeleTracking partnership, bringing Foundry into real-time hospital ops. With staff shortages and patient gridlock crippling systems globally, this isn’t just a software sale, it’s an efficiency revolution: fast-deployed, outcome-measurable, and politically scalable.
Yet here’s the rub: at $320B market cap, Palantir trades at 110x sales. To compress to even 30x (the ceiling for elite SaaS), we need 363% revenue growth. That’s a Tesla-style expectation. Is it justified?
Let’s benchmark:
• $CRWD trades ~21x sales, growing 35%
• $SNOW trades ~25x, but with wide adoption
• Even $NVDA, post-blowoff, sits at a multiple far below Palantir
This is where realism matters. If you’re buying $PLTR now, you’re not buying current cash flow. You’re buying future geopolitical dominance of AI infrastructure, or nothing.
⚔️ The Pattern Problem: No Handle, Just Hype
From a chartist’s view, the lack of a handle after the cup bothers me. It tells me this rally was news-driven, not base-built. A healthy base would’ve allowed institutions to load quietly, not this vertical hype move that now leaves investors uneasy.
The risk? Fragile confidence. The reward? NVDA-style breakout once Europe, defence, and healthcare go full AI-native. And if that happens, we could float above fundamentals for years, just like Nvidia did from 2020 to 2023.
🔍 Smart-Money Flow and Analysts
MarketSurge gives $PLTR a 99 Composite Rating, 98 EPS Rating, and 99 RS Rating. Fund ownership just climbed to 2,360 from 2,234, signalling continued institutional support.
• Citi: $115 base case
• William Blair: $125 top
• Wedbush: Bullish at $120
• Street average: $89
• My adjusted DCF: $110–$145 near-term range
Short interest is just 21% of float with 0.6 days to cover, meaning bears have almost no firepower. This isn’t being shorted anymore, it’s being front-run.
🧠 Contrarian Insight
There’s one critical tailwind I haven’t seen priced in yet: EU AI Act compliance. If Palantir becomes one of the few platforms certified for real-time AI governance across borders, it may lock out rivals from key use cases in energy, healthcare, and defence. That’s not in consensus models yet.
📌 Positioning and Trade Setup
I’m not chasing green candles. I want to own $PLTR before the next IV spike, not during it. If it reclaims $137.42 with volume confirmation, I’m scaling. If it flushes to the swing base, I’ll buy fear and hedge with short-dated calls. My edge? Knowing when to reload, not react.
📋 Key Watchlist Levels
• Support: $121.47 (5d model lower band), $129.37 (10-week SMA)
• Resistance: $137.42 (50-day), $147.25 (risk trigger), $148.22 (52-week high)
• Momentum score ≥ 4 with RSI12 > 65 = potential breakout conditions
• July earnings date: 11 Aug 25, watch for IV compression and AIP revenue commentary
🔒 Final Take
$PLTR isn’t a value stock. It’s a sentiment barometer, liquidity sponge, and geopolitical AI proxy. It trades on vision, not just valuation. But that doesn’t mean traders can ignore structure. The bullish trend remains valid above $129. Losing that opens the door to $121; below that, the narrative could start to fracture. I think we’ve got more room to run, but I’m trading this with one eye on the chart and the other on policy signals and earnings momentum.
📢 Don’t miss out! Like, Repost and Follow me for exclusive setups, cutting-edge trends, and insights that move markets 🚀📈 I’m obsessed with hunting down the next big movers and sharing strategies that crush it. Let’s outsmart the market and stack those gains together! 🍀
Trade like a boss! Happy trading ahead, Cheers, BC 📈🚀🍀🍀🍀
@Tiger_comments @TigerPicks @TigerStars @TigerObserver @TigerWire @Daily_Discussion
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.
Kol article bc