Executive Summary : Google or Microsoft? Why  Buy Both -

Theme:

The “battle of AI business models” pits Google’s vertically-integrated strategy (chip → model → product → ads) against Microsoft’s ecosystem-and-partnership model (OpenAI + Azure + enterprise integration).

Both firms are seeing strong AI tailwinds — but their monetisation pathways and ROI timing differ.

Google’s ROI strength:

The vertical stack yields compounding returns once infrastructure is amortised — lower long-term unit cost per AI operation.

Monetisation spreads across multiple consumer products (Search, Ads, YouTube), giving diversified upside once AI enhances ad precision and user retention.

However, short-term ROI is diluted by large capital outlays in chips and data-centres.

Microsoft’s ROI strength:

Immediate revenue conversion via subscription-based AI tools (Copilot at $30/user/month).

AI consumption drives Azure utilisation — high-margin incremental cloud revenue.

ROI is realised sooner, though dependent on maintaining the OpenAI relationship and enterprise demand stability

📌 Strategic Takeaway:

Short-term winner: Microsoft (faster ROI, clear enterprise monetisation).

Long-term compounding winner: Google (own stack, lower marginal cost, broader monetisation surface).

Sorry, this post has been deleted

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Report

Comment

  • Top
  • Latest
empty
No comments yet