Pay More, Solve Nothing? Singapore’s Cost-Based Policy Problem
Higher EP Salaries Won’t Save Singaporean Jobs — Here’s Why
💸 Raising EP & S Pass Salaries to “Protect Singaporeans”? Let’s be real—it doesn’t.
PM Lawrence Wong just announced higher salary thresholds:
EP (Employment Pass): $5,600
S Pass: $3,300
The stated goal? “Protect Singaporean jobs” and ensure “quality” foreign workers.”
But let’s examine what actually happens.
If a company genuinely needs foreign talent, will a higher salary threshold stop them? No. They’ll just pay more.
Today, many firms are enjoying AI-driven cost savings. Automation, workflow tools, and digital systems reduce headcount and operational costs. The higher salary threshold becomes just another cost line — easily absorbed.
And what follows?
The cost of hiring more expensive foreign workers is passed down to consumers.
The foreign worker still comes — at a higher salary.
The Singaporean job seeker? Still competing in the same market.
The Bigger Issue: Skills Development Isn’t Working
We often hear that locals can upskill through SkillsFuture.
But let’s be honest — is it really developing deep, competitive capability?
A large portion of funded courses include:
Barbering
Massaging
Basic AI tools like ChatGPT usage
TikTok marketing
Image editing
Video editing
These are not high-barrier, high-value technical skills.
Learning to use ChatGPT or Canva is like learning Microsoft Excel — useful, yes. But it is basic digital literacy, not advanced AI engineering or machine learning capability.
Many Singaporeans are also confused about what constitutes real technical depth:
AI vs basic AI tools
Cloud computing vs simple SaaS usage
SQL database architecture vs running simple queries
Data science vs basic dashboard building
There is a dangerous illusion of upskilling — where people attend short courses, receive certificates, but gain little industry-grade expertise.
The Structural Gap
The real competitive skills needed today are:
Advanced software engineering
AI model development
Cybersecurity
Deep data infrastructure
Semiconductor and advanced manufacturing expertise
These require:
Years of technical foundation
Rigorous training
Real industry apprenticeship
Strong mathematics and systems thinking
Short courses on “AI content creation” or “TikTok monetisation” do not build national competitiveness.
Healthcare: Another Structural Example
Even with:
7% salary increases
PR pathways for foreign healthcare workers
We still see:
Rising MediShield premiums
Higher hospital bills
Long waiting times
Burnout among staff
Money is injected. Costs increase.
But manpower stress and systemic bottlenecks persist.
The Pattern
🚗 COE & ERP – Price congestion. Congestion remains.
🏠 ABSD – Price speculation. Housing pressure remains.
🌱 Carbon tax – Price emissions. Emissions also increased.
Imposing a carbon tax is supposed to help save the environment and encourage energy conservation.
But when we keep importing a large population — while the US and other major economies are returning to expanding carbon-intensive activities — it feels like all our sacrifices go down the drain.
What do we actually see on the ground? Higher inflation, rising costs, and a tougher life for Singaporeans
It’s like asking your child to switch off the lights, off the fan to save electricity…
while you secretly leave all the air-cons running and invite 20 more guests to stay over.
The child sacrifices. The bill still goes up.
That’s how carbon tax feels sometimes — we’re told to conserve and tighten our belts, but if population keeps expanding and bigger economies keep burning fuel freely, it’s like trying to empty a bathtub with a spoon while the tap is still running.
In the end, the water rises… and we’re the ones paying for it.
💼 EP/S Pass – Price foreign labour. Labour market competition remains.
🎓 SkillsFuture – Fund courses. Real capability gap remains.
💡 The pattern is consistent:
Pricing mechanisms and funding programs create activity — but don’t always solve structural problems.
What Would Actually Work?
✅ Deep technical pipelines from school to industry
✅ Apprenticeship-style industry immersion
✅ Sector-specific workforce planning
✅ Raising standards of training, not just volume of courses
✅ Clear distinction between digital literacy and advanced technical mastery
Singaporeans don’t need more surface-level certificates.
We need real capability building.
Policies should solve root causes — not just raise prices, increase premiums, or fund low-impact courses.
Singaporeans deserve better than token fixes.
Modify on 2026-02-18 16:24
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

