Amazon +20% This Month! Anthropic $25B Mega Deal: Break $300 Like Google’s Re-Rating?
After Monday’s close, Amazon announced it will invest up to an additional $25 billion into Anthropic, while Anthropic simultaneously committed to spending $100 billion on AWS over the next decade. $Amazon.com(AMZN)$ rose more than 2.4% pre-market to $254. With earnings season approaching (April 29), one core question is now on the table:
This time, will Amazon become the next “Google-style re-rating”?
Over the past two weeks, Amazon has rebounded strongly by 18%, turning its year-to-date performance positive at +7.5%, completely shaking off its label as “one of the worst-performing Mag 7 stocks” at the start of the year. Now, the weakest names are Microsoft and Tesla — Amazon is no longer on that list.
1. What does Anthropic mega deal really mean for Amazon — AI Trade or AI Bubble?
Amazon’s total investment in Anthropic has now reached around $33 billion (previously $8B + this $25B), making it the largest single external bet in the global AI model race.
In return, Anthropic commits to spending over $100 billion on AWS over the next 10 years, and locking in 5 gigawatts of compute capacity for training and deploying Claude — including nearly 1GW of Trainium2/Trainium3 capacity coming online by the end of this year.
AWS customers can now access the full native Anthropic Claude interface directly within the AWS console, without additional contracts or billing relationships.
-
Claude Opus 4.7 is already live on Bedrock, with SWE-bench Pro score of 64.3% and Verified score of 87.6%
-
The Mythos model achieves 87% accuracy under a 3M token context window
Is This a “Circular Trade”?
Yes, some people are concerned. Is this similar to last year’s OpenAI–NVIDIA dynamic?
Amazon invests in Anthropic, and Anthropic uses that money to buy AWS — it looks like money moving from one hand to the other.
But ultimately, the market will judge based on one thing: Whether AWS revenue actually accelerates in a meaningful way
2. Amazon’s two investment thesis — Which has more upside?
AI Compute: $15B Run Rate, Still Supply-Constrained
AWS AI revenue has already surpassed a $15 billion annual run rate. Goldman describes it as “supply-constrained” — Amazon doesn’t lack customers, it lacks the ability to build data centers fast enough.
Its in-house chips Trainium and Inferentia now represent a $20 billion annualized scale, meaning Amazon is no longer fully dependent on NVIDIA in the AI compute stack, and is building its own moat.
Anthropic + Bedrock: Becoming Standard in Enterprise Procurement
This is currently the most direct commercialization path.
Now, 1 in 3 U.S. companies is paying for Anthropic models, meaning this has moved from “tech experimentation” to a fixed line item in enterprise IT budgets.
For AWS, this is one of the stickiest layers of recurring service revenue.
3. Can It Break $300? Referencing $Alphabet(GOOG)$ Re-Rating Playbook
Google’s re-rating this year was driven by a key shift: The market regained confidence in Gemini and Cloud AI commercialization, moving from a bearish narrative of “lagging OpenAI” to a bullish narrative of “ads + cloud dual engines.”
That shift led to a meaningful valuation expansion. Amazon is now at a similar narrative inflection point.
Over the past year, concerns focused on: AWS growth, AI capex, Anthropic investment returns.
But the recent price action suggests that, as AI revenue continues to be validated, the market is starting to assign Amazon a higher AI infrastructure premium.
Key Difference vs Google
Google has clearer AI monetization pathways(e.g., AI Overview ads, paid Gemini users)
Amazon’s AI revenue is currently more reflected in AWS compute consumption, and its “last mile” monetization is less clear.
That’s why its rally hasn’t been as strong as Google’s.
From the current pre-market price of $254, there is about 18% upside to $300.
Discussion
-
Anthropic’s $100B AWS commitment — do you see this as real money or an AI bubble?
-
Can Amazon replicate Google’s AI re-rating and break $300 after earnings?
-
In the AI infrastructure space, who really has pricing power now — AMZN, NVDA, or MSFT?
Leave your comments to win tiger coins~
r SG users only, welcome to open a CBA today and enjoy access to a trading limit of up to SGD 20,000 with unlimited trading on SG, HK, and US stocks, as well as ETFs.
🎉Cash Boost Account Now Supports 35,000+ Stocks & ETFs – Greater Flexibility Now
-
Find out more here.
Complete your first Cash Boost Account trade with a trade amount of ≥ SGD1000* to get SGD 688 stock vouchers*! The trade can be executed using any payment type available under the Cash Boost Account: Cash, CPF, SRS, or CDP.
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

2. AMZN > US$300 is possible, but earnings must show AWS acceleration + AI monetisation + margin discipline. Without clear conversion of AI demand into profit, re-rating may stall.
3. Pricing power now:
NVDA: strongest (chips + ecosystem, high margins)
MSFT: strong via enterprise bundling (Azure + Copilot)
AMZN: improving, but still proving ROI
Summary: NVDA leads pricing, MSFT leads monetisation, AMZN is the upside play.
I’m more bullish on the Anthropic + Bedrock layer than pure compute. Compute is capital-heavy, but enterprise lock-in is the real moat. As companies embed Claude via Amazon Web Services, switching costs rise — similar to $Microsoft(MSFT)$ ’s model.
On $300, a re-rating like $Alphabet(GOOGL)$ is possible but needs clearer monetization. If AWS growth re-accelerates, sentiment can shift. For now, Nvidia still holds the strongest pricing power. I also think the next key catalyst will be whether AI revenue starts contributing meaningfully to AWS margin expansion.
@Tiger_comments @TigerStars @TigerClub @Tiger_SG
但如果AI收入只是增长、利润却被资本开支吃掉,那股价空间会被压住。
能不能上300美元?我觉得关键不在这笔投资本身,而在财报能不能证明两件事:
第一,AI真的在拉动AWS增速,而不是只是在烧CapEx
第二,自研芯片(Trainium)有没有开始改善利润结构
但亚马逊的问题也很现实:它赚的是“用量的钱”,而不是“产品溢价的钱”。对比Alphabet,人家可以直接把AI变成广告收入或订阅,路径更清晰;AWS目前还是偏底层。
先讲结论:这不是简单的AI泡沫,更像是一种“锁需求”的基础设施打法。
这不是泡沫问题,而是“谁先把AI从成本变成利润”的问题。