Between, I view SK hynix as the higher-risk, higher-reward pure play on AI memory demand, while Samsung is the more diversified & resilient option. SK hynix benefits more directly from Nvidia-driven HBM demand but is also more exposed if AI capex slows or pricing weakens.
On the bubble question, I don’t see a full top yet, but I do see a late-cycle phase with elevated FOMO and volatility. The fundamentals are still strong, but selectivity matters more as sharp corrections become more common.
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.
- EricVaughan·06-10 18:33TOPHBM is the choke point, agreed. I’m watching SK hynix more than Samsung here — if Vera Rubin ramps on schedule, memory suppliers probably lead the next leg. Who’s pricing in robotics yet?1Report
- 1PC·06-10 23:21TOPNice Sharing 😁 @DiAngel @Aqa @koolgal @Barcode @JC888 @Shernice軒嬣 20001Report