Dumb ass author playing revers

1
Comment
Favorite

Dumb ass author playing reversion to the mean, if you want value go buy Nike

Why Growth Stocks' Surprising Strength May be Warning of a Market Bubble

Growth stocks usually lag when interest rates rise. But not this year. Here's why that's concerning.Growth stocks' surprising strength in the face of rising rates is reminiscent of the last few months

Why Growth Stocks' Surprising Strength May be Warning of a Market Bubble

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Report

Comment

Top
Latest

No comments yet

Most Discussed

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"data":{"magic":2,"id":608990209090096,"tweetId":"608990209090096","gmtCreate":1789705942251,"gmtModify":1789708136267,"author":{"id":3575343781681994,"idStr":"3575343781681994","authorId":3575343781681994,"authorIdStr":"3575343781681994","name":"White Cat","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/06d363ddd2da6266ae05f61b5862984a","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[],"fanSize":2,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"title":"","html":"<html><head></head><body><p>Dumb ass author playing reversion to the mean, if you want value go buy Nike&nbsp;</p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p>Dumb ass author playing reversion to the mean, if you want value go buy Nike&nbsp;</p></body></html>","text":"Dumb ass author playing reversion to the mean, if you want value go buy Nike","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/608990209090096","repostId":2668997809,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2668997809","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1789702756,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2668997809?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2026-09-18 11:39","market":"sh","language":"en","title":"Why Growth Stocks' Surprising Strength May be Warning of a Market Bubble","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2668997809","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Growth stocks usually lag when interest rates rise. But not this year. Here's why that's concerning.Growth stocks' surprising strength in the face of rising rates is reminiscent of the last few months","content":"<html><head></head><body><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Yet another warning sign of a stock-market bubble is coming from growth stocks&#39; surprising strength.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">I say &#34;surprising&#34; because, despite sharply higher interest rates over the past six month, they have handily beaten value stocks. It&#39;s usually just the opposite.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Growth stocks (those trading for relatively high ratios of price to earnings, cash flow, book value and so forth) typically exhibit the greatest relative strength when interest rates are falling - not rising. That&#39;s because a greater share of their fundamental value comes from future years, and as a result they suffer disproportionately when higher interest rates are used to calculate those future years&#39; present value.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Value stocks, of course, are just the opposite. They trade for relatively low price ratios, and so more of their fundamental value comes from current earnings. The present value of those earnings is therefore relatively immune from interest-rate increases.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Try telling this investment principle to growth stocks this year. The Treasury&#39;s 10-year yield BX:TMUBMUSD10Y hit its 2026 low in late February at 3.99%, but after the Federal Reserve&#39;s interest-rate hike this week, it&#39;s been trading about a full percentage point higher. Yet since the February low, the Vanguard S&amp;P 500 Growth ETF VOOG has beaten the Vanguard S&amp;P 500 Value ETF by 9.9 percentage points - 15.2% to 5.3%, according to LSEG total return data (through Sep. 16).</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Growth stocks&#39; surprising strength in the face of rising rates is reminiscent of the last few months of the dot-com bubble. From the end of 1999&#39;s third quarter to when the Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA hit its bubble high in mid-January 2000, the Treasury&#39;s 10-year yield rose 85 basis points - almost as much as it has since this year&#39;s February low. Over this four-month period the S&amp;P 500 Growth Index (to which the VOOG ETF is benchmarked) outperformed the S&amp;P 500 Value Index by 8.2 percentage points.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">The reason such strength constitutes a bubble warning is that investors have to be particularly exuberant in order to bid growth stocks higher in the wake of rising interest rates. It would be remarkable for growth stocks just to hold their own when rates are rising, since even that assumes earnings will grow faster despite rising rates. But it strains credulity to assume that earnings will grow so much more quickly that, even after being discounted at higher interest rates, they still come out ahead.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/232b862318c3090613332edc93d29258\" data-align=\"center\" tg-width=\"477\" tg-height=\"347\"/><span></span></p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">While the analogy between recent months and the top of the dot-com bubble is stark and alarming, it&#39;s not the only evidence pointing to the downside risk of exuberant earnings-growth assumptions. Take a look at the above chart, which plots the correlation between earnings-growth rates and the S&amp;P 500&#39;s return. On average since 1927, according to Ned Davis Research data, the S&amp;P 500 SPX performed significantly better in quarters in which earnings were growing more slowly - or even falling modestly.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">To apply the lesson of this chart to today, consider that analysts are projecting year-over-year earnings growth of 26.3% for the fourth quarter of this year (according to FactSet). After the dot-com bubble burst in early 2000, value stocks hugely outperformed growth stocks, and it wouldn&#39;t be surprising if something similar occurs in the coming months.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">With that thought in mind, the list below contains those value stocks currently recommended for purchase by at least two of the investment newsletters monitored by my performance-auditing firm. Included are only those recommended stocks with ratios of price to earnings, cash flow, sales and book value that are lower than the S&amp;P 500&#39;s and which also have a higher dividend yield.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/c4a88575807497f447bd11c4fa216b90\" data-align=\"center\" tg-width=\"540\" tg-height=\"593\"/><span></span></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Growth Stocks' Surprising Strength May be Warning of a Market Bubble</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Growth Stocks' Surprising Strength May be Warning of a Market Bubble\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2026-09-18 11:39</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Yet another warning sign of a stock-market bubble is coming from growth stocks&#39; surprising strength.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">I say &#34;surprising&#34; because, despite sharply higher interest rates over the past six month, they have handily beaten value stocks. It&#39;s usually just the opposite.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Growth stocks (those trading for relatively high ratios of price to earnings, cash flow, book value and so forth) typically exhibit the greatest relative strength when interest rates are falling - not rising. That&#39;s because a greater share of their fundamental value comes from future years, and as a result they suffer disproportionately when higher interest rates are used to calculate those future years&#39; present value.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Value stocks, of course, are just the opposite. They trade for relatively low price ratios, and so more of their fundamental value comes from current earnings. The present value of those earnings is therefore relatively immune from interest-rate increases.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Try telling this investment principle to growth stocks this year. The Treasury&#39;s 10-year yield BX:TMUBMUSD10Y hit its 2026 low in late February at 3.99%, but after the Federal Reserve&#39;s interest-rate hike this week, it&#39;s been trading about a full percentage point higher. Yet since the February low, the Vanguard S&amp;P 500 Growth ETF VOOG has beaten the Vanguard S&amp;P 500 Value ETF by 9.9 percentage points - 15.2% to 5.3%, according to LSEG total return data (through Sep. 16).</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Growth stocks&#39; surprising strength in the face of rising rates is reminiscent of the last few months of the dot-com bubble. From the end of 1999&#39;s third quarter to when the Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA hit its bubble high in mid-January 2000, the Treasury&#39;s 10-year yield rose 85 basis points - almost as much as it has since this year&#39;s February low. Over this four-month period the S&amp;P 500 Growth Index (to which the VOOG ETF is benchmarked) outperformed the S&amp;P 500 Value Index by 8.2 percentage points.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">The reason such strength constitutes a bubble warning is that investors have to be particularly exuberant in order to bid growth stocks higher in the wake of rising interest rates. It would be remarkable for growth stocks just to hold their own when rates are rising, since even that assumes earnings will grow faster despite rising rates. But it strains credulity to assume that earnings will grow so much more quickly that, even after being discounted at higher interest rates, they still come out ahead.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/232b862318c3090613332edc93d29258\" data-align=\"center\" tg-width=\"477\" tg-height=\"347\"/><span></span></p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">While the analogy between recent months and the top of the dot-com bubble is stark and alarming, it&#39;s not the only evidence pointing to the downside risk of exuberant earnings-growth assumptions. Take a look at the above chart, which plots the correlation between earnings-growth rates and the S&amp;P 500&#39;s return. On average since 1927, according to Ned Davis Research data, the S&amp;P 500 SPX performed significantly better in quarters in which earnings were growing more slowly - or even falling modestly.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">To apply the lesson of this chart to today, consider that analysts are projecting year-over-year earnings growth of 26.3% for the fourth quarter of this year (according to FactSet). After the dot-com bubble burst in early 2000, value stocks hugely outperformed growth stocks, and it wouldn&#39;t be surprising if something similar occurs in the coming months.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">With that thought in mind, the list below contains those value stocks currently recommended for purchase by at least two of the investment newsletters monitored by my performance-auditing firm. Included are only those recommended stocks with ratios of price to earnings, cash flow, sales and book value that are lower than the S&amp;P 500&#39;s and which also have a higher dividend yield.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/c4a88575807497f447bd11c4fa216b90\" data-align=\"center\" tg-width=\"540\" tg-height=\"593\"/><span></span></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SSS":"Cyber Hornet S&P 500 and Solana 75/25 Strategy ETF","PMDE":"PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - December","FLAO":"AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Floor5 Apr/Oct ETF","XXX":"Cyber Hornet S&P 500 and XRP 75/25 Strategy ETF","FEBU":"AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Feb ETF","SPYM":"投资组合标普500指数ETF-SPDR","EQRR":"ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF","ISSXF":"IShares Core S&P  500 Index ETF","GBXB":"Goldman Sachs U.S. Large Cap Buffer 2 ETF","JOYT":"JPMorgan Equity and Options Total Return ETF","UOCT":"Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - October","RGLO":"Global Equity Active ETF","CGUS":"Capital Group Core Equity ETF","CGDV":"Capital Group Dividend Value ETF","GXDW":"Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF","BKLC":"BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF","SPY":"标普500ETF","MRCP":"PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - March","VOTE":"TCW Transform 500 ETF","SCHG":"Schwab U.S. Large -Cap Growth ET","XSPI":"NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF","XPAY":"Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF","TSPA":"T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","CFO":"VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF","GPIX":"GOLDMAN SACHS S&P 500 CORE PREMIUM INCOME ETF","VYM":"红利股ETF-Vanguard","HELO":"JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF","LGDX":"INTECH S&P LARGE CAP DIVERSIFIED ALPHA ETF","GSUS":"Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF","UXJA":"FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January","OALC":"OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF","PTLC":"Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF","FLCC":"Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF","CAOS":"ALPHA ARCHITECT TAIL RISK ETF","LGH":"HCM Defender 500 Index ETF","FELC":"FIDELITY ENHANCED LARGE CAP CORE ETF","VOO":"Vanguard标普500ETF","RJZ":"ELEMENTS Linked to the Rogers International Commodity Index - Metals Total Return","PBJL":"PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - July","VGFPF":"Vanguard Funds PLC","PTL":"Inspire 500 ETF","XUSP":"Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF","VSL":"Volshares Large Cap ETF","VUG":"成长股指数ETF-Vanguard MSCI","DECU":"AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF","VOOG":"Vanguard标普500成长ETF","ACLC":"AMERICAN CENTURY LARGE CAP EQUITY ETF","CPST":"Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - September","FEBT":"AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Feb ETF"},"source_url":"https://dowjonesnews.com/newdjn/logon.aspx?AL=N","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2668997809","content_text":"Yet another warning sign of a stock-market bubble is coming from growth stocks' surprising strength.I say \"surprising\" because, despite sharply higher interest rates over the past six month, they have handily beaten value stocks. It's usually just the opposite.Growth stocks (those trading for relatively high ratios of price to earnings, cash flow, book value and so forth) typically exhibit the greatest relative strength when interest rates are falling - not rising. That's because a greater share of their fundamental value comes from future years, and as a result they suffer disproportionately when higher interest rates are used to calculate those future years' present value.Value stocks, of course, are just the opposite. They trade for relatively low price ratios, and so more of their fundamental value comes from current earnings. The present value of those earnings is therefore relatively immune from interest-rate increases.Try telling this investment principle to growth stocks this year. The Treasury's 10-year yield BX:TMUBMUSD10Y hit its 2026 low in late February at 3.99%, but after the Federal Reserve's interest-rate hike this week, it's been trading about a full percentage point higher. Yet since the February low, the Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF VOOG has beaten the Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF by 9.9 percentage points - 15.2% to 5.3%, according to LSEG total return data (through Sep. 16).Growth stocks' surprising strength in the face of rising rates is reminiscent of the last few months of the dot-com bubble. From the end of 1999's third quarter to when the Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA hit its bubble high in mid-January 2000, the Treasury's 10-year yield rose 85 basis points - almost as much as it has since this year's February low. Over this four-month period the S&P 500 Growth Index (to which the VOOG ETF is benchmarked) outperformed the S&P 500 Value Index by 8.2 percentage points.The reason such strength constitutes a bubble warning is that investors have to be particularly exuberant in order to bid growth stocks higher in the wake of rising interest rates. It would be remarkable for growth stocks just to hold their own when rates are rising, since even that assumes earnings will grow faster despite rising rates. But it strains credulity to assume that earnings will grow so much more quickly that, even after being discounted at higher interest rates, they still come out ahead.While the analogy between recent months and the top of the dot-com bubble is stark and alarming, it's not the only evidence pointing to the downside risk of exuberant earnings-growth assumptions. Take a look at the above chart, which plots the correlation between earnings-growth rates and the S&P 500's return. On average since 1927, according to Ned Davis Research data, the S&P 500 SPX performed significantly better in quarters in which earnings were growing more slowly - or even falling modestly.To apply the lesson of this chart to today, consider that analysts are projecting year-over-year earnings growth of 26.3% for the fourth quarter of this year (according to FactSet). After the dot-com bubble burst in early 2000, value stocks hugely outperformed growth stocks, and it wouldn't be surprising if something similar occurs in the coming months.With that thought in mind, the list below contains those value stocks currently recommended for purchase by at least two of the investment newsletters monitored by my performance-auditing firm. Included are only those recommended stocks with ratios of price to earnings, cash flow, sales and book value that are lower than the S&P 500's and which also have a higher dividend yield.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"MRCP":0.74,"SPYM":0.74,"PBJL":0.74,"UOCT":0.74,"FELC":0.74,"RGLO":0.9,"TSPA":0.74,"FEBT":0.74,"XSPI":0.74,"HELO":0.74,"VYM":0.74,"VGFPF":0.9,"FLCC":0.74,"EQRR":0.84,"GXDW":0.9,"VOTE":0.9,"OALC":0.74,"DECU":0.9,"XPAY":0.74,"PTL":0.74,"VOO":0.74,"BKLC":0.74,"VOOG":0.9,"ACLC":0.74,"GSUS":0.74,"XUSP":0.74,"CAOS":0.74,"VSL":0.74,"LGH":0.74,"UXJA":0.74,"RJZ":0.74,".SPX":0.74,"CFO":0.74,"FLAO":0.74,"XXX":0.74,"LGDX":0.74,"PTLC":0.84,"CGUS":0.74,"GBXB":0.74,"SSS":0.74,"SCHG":0.74,"GPIX":0.74,"JOYT":0.9,"VUG":0.74,"SPY":0.74,"ISSXF":0.84,"PMDE":0.9,"FEBU":0.9,"CGDV":0.74,"CPST":0.74}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":91,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"EN","currentLanguage":"EN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":62,"optionInvolvedFlag":false,"subscribersOnly":false,"subscribersOnlyAccessible":false,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ORIG"},"commentList":[],"hasMoreComment":false,"orderType":2}