$Intel(INTC)$  smart no choice but maybe a lot lose job

$Intel( $Intel(INTC)$ )$ $Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing( $Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing(TSM)$ )$ $NVIDIA Corp( $NVIDIA(NVDA)$ )$ On April 14, 2025, Intel made waves by selling a 51% stake in its FPGA subsidiary Altera to Silver Lake for $4.46 billion, valuing Altera at $8.75 billion. Intel retains a 49% stake, and its stock jumped 3% on the news. But at nearly half the $16.7 billion Intel paid for Altera in 2015, this discount sale raises big questions: Is this a savvy step in Intel’s transformation, or a sign of deeper struggles? Will more spinoffs follow? And should investors be bullish on Intel’s future? Let’s dig in with fresh data and analysis as of

$Intel(INTC)$  going down deeper and deeper 

$Intel(INTC)$ While the sale provides immediate capital, Intel's decision to divest a majority stake in Altera raises questions about its long-term strategy. Altera's 2024 performance, with $1.54 billion in revenue and $35 million in adjusted operating income, indicates potential that Intel might be relinquishing too soon. Additionally, the sale price reflects a significant devaluation from the $16.7 billion Intel paid in 2015, suggesting a possible misstep in maximizing asset value.

$Intel(INTC)$ Intel's sale of a majority stake in Altera to Silver Lake is a calculated move to sharpen its focus on core businesses and improve financial health. By retaining a 49% stake, Intel can still benefit from Altera's growth, especially as the FPGA market expands in areas like AI and edge computing. The appointment of Raghib Hussain, formerly of Marvell, as Altera's CEO, brings experienced leadership to drive innovation and competitiveness.

$Intel(INTC)$ Selling a majority stake in Altera at a valuation significantly lower than its 2015 acquisition price of $16.7 billion raises concerns about Intel's long-term strategy. While the immediate influx of $4.46 billion may alleviate short-term financial pressures, it also means relinquishing control over a business that could be pivotal in the growing FPGA market, especially with the rise of AI and edge computing. The move might be seen as Intel stepping back from diversification efforts, potentially narrowing its future revenue streams. Furthermore, the success of this partnership heavily relies on Silver Lake's management of Altera, introducing uncertainties that could impact Intel's residual stake. This decisio

$Intel(INTC)$ Intel's sale of a majority stake in Altera is a calculated move to refocus on its core competencies—CPUs, GPUs, and foundry services. By partnering with Silver Lake, a firm with a strong track record in tech investments, Altera gains operational independence and access to resources that could accelerate its growth in the FPGA market. Intel retains a 49% stake, allowing it to benefit from Altera's future success without the burden of direct management. This divestiture also strengthens Intel's balance sheet, providing capital to invest in areas with higher growth potential. The market's positive reaction, with Intel's shares rising approximately 6% following the announcement, suggests investor confidence in t

$Intel(INTC)$  we need to see the revised financial details 

$Intel(INTC)$ While Intel hasn't quite lived up to its long-term potential just yet, the recent news of a new CEO has definitely sparked some hope. The stock bump shows that people are cautiously optimistic, and I think you're right that there's still room for growth – especially with cost reductions, a potential recovery in the PC market, and just the fact that expectations are pretty low right now. It's kind of the perfect storm for a rebound. I still think Intel is undervalued and could be a solid buy for investors looking for an opportunity. I predict could break into the early $30 range after April's report.

$Intel(INTC)$ Most stocks are Down because the Market is Down, Intel is Down because they need to keep it Down. What happens if and when Intel USA takes back market share of the Chip Market? While Pat was CEO many companies were splitting Intel and taking the parts they need for themselves. CEO Tan is an unexpected problem for them now. Intel USA's 18a and AI will be in more PCs and Laptops than all of them put together. I like a good fight, that's why I am here.

$Intel(INTC)$ Intel going green again while the rest of semis bleed? Not surprising. It’s trading below book, has a new CEO, old board members stepping out, internal reforms kicking in, and Tan’s global chip influence is the real deal. The turnaround is already underway—this isn’t just another AI hype play.

$Intel(INTC)$  

$Intel(INTC)$ Intel’s recent pullback has raised questions about whether its foundry business should be split to unlock more value. A separation could allow the foundry division to focus on its own growth and investments, without the legacy of Intel’s core semiconductor business. It might attract more specialized investors and streamline operations. However, splitting could also create execution risks, reduce economies of scale, and complicate Intel’s integrated approach. The decision hinges on how the foundry business evolves and whether it can stand independently in a competitive market.

$Intel(INTC)$ Intel’s recent pullback reflects market skepticism about its foundry turnaround. Spinning off the foundry business could unlock shareholder value by allowing more focus on core chip design. However, the foundry unit’s heavy capital demands and slow profitability turnaround make it a tough call. A split might help streamline operations, but execution risks remain high. For now, staying cautious until clearer signs of foundry growth emerge seems prudent.

$Intel(INTC)$ Intel’s recent pullback reflects market skepticism about its foundry turnaround. Spinning off the foundry business could unlock shareholder value by allowing more focus on core chip design. However, the foundry unit’s heavy capital demands and slow profitability turnaround make it a tough call. A split might help streamline operations, but execution risks remain high. For now, staying cautious until clearer signs of foundry growth emerge seems prudent.

Buy some and they should split low business 

$Intel(INTC)$ Intel board should make up their mind and get rid of the unpersuasive anti-IDM ppl who doesn't add much value in other areas. Their seats should be for open minded ppl capable of adding value to Intel ppl. That's the minimal condition to rehire Pat or any other good CEO for Intel.

Intel go go go 👍 worth to buy more