...bearish rating aged like milk... - it's just a nice way of saying you are wrong. Yet you still continue not to correct your position but mislead further. Beat size is expected to shrink, but demand outstripped supply is simply an economic rule you can't go against and being a leader will continue to raise its stock price until a worthy rival appears to split the market share.
Who is holding Morgan Stanley responsible for their wrongful call? Please have the decent morals to keep your mouth shut about Palantir moving forward!
Morgan Stanley removes Underweight rating on Palantir after ‘blowout’ Q3
Morgan Stanley says the firm’s previous Underweight thesis on Palantir was predicated on maturing government growth, lagging commercial traction, and limited free cash flow revision potential, but the trendlines extending into this quarter proved stronger than expected and the company’s Q3 “blowout” highlights the company’s AI positioning, as well as its “rare Rule of 68 profile,” says the analyst, who is removing the firm’s price target and rating on the shares.Closing Bell Movers: Palantir jumps 13% after results. Palantir Technologies Reports Strong Q3 2024 Revenue Surge
BofA you were so quiet... why raised only when the price is shooting up. Safe bets?
BofA Securities Raises Price Target on Tesla to $260 From $220, Maintains Buy Rating
BofA securities raises price target on Tesla to $260 from $220, maintains buy rating.Tesla shares rose 3.6% in morning trading after soaring 10% on Tuesday.Tesla has an average hold rating and price target range of $85 to $310, according to analysts polled by Capital IQ.
Where are the anal-yts that expect decline in sales and that the share price will take a beating? Where are they? Who are taking them to task for a wrongful analysis resulting in retail investors letting go too early?
Give that sum to that extraordinary man! It's his anyway and he runs the show nobody else can. Else try giving that sum to another Tom Dick or Harry and you see the value of the company lose everything overnight? Don't be Penny Wise Pound Foolish!
Tesla Stock Drops 3% as Glass Lewis Urges Shareholders to Reject Musk Pay Package
Proxy advisory firm Glass Lewis added some drama to the coming Tesla annual shareholder meeting.Tesla’s board is asking shareholders to reauthorize CEO Elon Musk’s compensation after a Delaware judge
Lower price, lower margin lower share price as what most analysts would foresee. Similarly these are faced by Tesla's rivals. Tesla has the scale to command the pricing and many services revenue which can compensate for the lower margin. Sell off will be higher because all analysts expect lower margin as the main reason. What I see is after these massive sell off, the price would still be set to the supoort at 228-240.
Is this how a trade union should operate? By calling a strike, are you going to ensure these workers continue to have a source of income if Amazon removes workers or move their operations out of these countries.
Is there a vested interest in this article? Otherwise, this is just another skewed article just to bring down a person and the share price. There are too many moving parts to deliver a projection or inspiration. No dividends in this stock anyway, hence if you believe his words, go for it else stay out and keep your stereotype for yourself.
Price cut is good as it cements its position as a leader in the EV industry. Analysts should not just see price drops as affecting margins. As a retail investor, I would like to see they sell more to remain market leader since they have the capabilities to produce the volume. When Tesla rivals can't play volume game, Tesla will neventually emerge as a winner (with more cars to make up for the same or more profits). It's a tough market so please stop seeing price car as an equation to bad sales.
I noticed there are always anal-ysts that always post views and articles when near quarter release. This has been the trend to move shares into quick sell/buy. After that, these articles accuracy just scoot off without having to bear the consequences of their "truth/false".