# What “Low Point” Really Means To me, a “low point” is not the lowest price in history. It is whether the current price is low relative to current fundamentals and valuation. A stock can trade at a high price but still be cheap if earnings and assets are growing. That is why I focus on valuation, not charts alone. Not financial advice. # Left-Side Buying Left-side buying means I add as the price falls, not after a trend confirms. This can be uncomfortable, so I only do it with companies I have studied for months. I keep cash ready and scale in slowly. The goal is to accumulate a core position at attractive valuations, not to catch the exact bottom. Not financial advice. # Position Sizing Matters Position sizing is key. My value positions can be large because they are long-term. If they ri
I think Muse’s per-transaction cut mainly hits the shopping site entry point. Not just payment — it touches the moment someone decides what to buy and where. That’s where Amazon and other retail giants are strongest. If Muse becomes the first screen for shopping, it starts eating into their product discovery and ad money. Payment is affected too, but Meta is partnering with Stripe, PayPal and others, so that entry point is less directly threatened. For small businesses, I actually see potential. They can’t outbid big companies on ads. If an AI agent recommends based on product fit instead of ad spend, that could help them. But it’s still too early. The main issue is trust. I personally don’t trust Meta. I won’t give it all my info. If users don’t trust the agent, none of this works. Also,
# My Core Strategy My core strategy combines value investing with small-capital tactical trading. I focus on large, asset-rich companies, watch them for at least six months, and buy on weakness with left-side averaging. If a position grows too large, I trim but never fully exit. For short-term trades, I only use small capital on highly liquid, high-beta stocks and options. I remain long-term bullish on the US economy. Not financial advice. # Why Asset-Rich Companies Why asset-rich, high-value companies? They often have stronger balance sheets, better cash flow, and more ability to survive downturns. I prefer companies with real assets, not just stories. I watch them for months before buying. A low point is about current valuation, not historical price. If the price is high but valuation is
$100 oil is not just an energy story. It is a margin story. If oil stays above $100 for more than a short spike, the clearest winners could be low-cost energy producers and oilfield service companies. The losers may be airlines, logistics, chemicals and other businesses with high fuel costs but limited pricing power. Tech is more complicated. Most software companies are not directly exposed to oil, but persistent high oil prices could keep inflation elevated and delay rate cuts. That would put more pressure on expensive growth stocks. I would also watch gold if high oil comes with geopolitical risk and weaker growth expectations. For my portfolio, I would not chase energy just because oil crossed $100. The key is duration. If prices stay high for months, I would gradually favour qu