To The Moon

If I had to choose one ETF to DCA consistently, my answer would be QQQ.

Not because it is the safest ETF.

Not because it will outperform every year.

And definitely not because I expect technology stocks to go up in a straight line.

I choose it because I want my long-term money exposed to companies benefiting from some of the biggest structural trends of the next decade: AI, cloud computing, semiconductors, automation, digital advertising and software.

And DCA solves one of my biggest problems as an investor:

I do not need to predict every bottom correctly.

🔵 WHY QQQ OVER VOO OR SPY?

VOO and SPY are excellent core ETFs. If someone prioritises diversification and smoother compounding, I would happily recommend starting there.

But personally, I want more growth exposure.

QQQ gives me heavier exposure to many businesses I would want to own anyway, without forcing me to decide every week whether NVDA, META, MSFT, AMZN or another technology leader offers the best entry.

That matters because today's winner may not be the winner five years from now.

The ETF does some of that selection for me.

🟢 MY DCA STRATEGY IS NOT COMPLETELY BLIND

This is where I differ slightly from traditional DCA.

I would invest a fixed amount regularly, but keep additional cash available for corrections.

My simple framework:

🟢 Normal market: 1x regular DCA

🟢 QQQ down 5-10%: 1.5x

🟢 QQQ down 10-15%: 2x

🟢 QQQ down 15-20%: 2.5x

🟢 QQQ down more than 20%: 3x, provided the long-term earnings thesis remains intact

I call this weighted DCA.

I am not trying to catch the exact bottom.

I am simply allowing volatility to buy me more shares.

🔴 THE HARDEST PART OF DCA

The mathematics is easy.

The psychology is not.

When QQQ is making new highs, everyone wants to start investing.

When it falls 15%, suddenly every headline explains why technology is finished.

Yet the entire advantage of DCA comes from continuing to buy when your emotions tell you to stop.

That is why I would automate the base contribution.

Remove the monthly decision.

Then use additional cash opportunistically during genuine corrections.

WHAT IF I WERE STARTING TODAY?

With $10,000, I would not put everything into QQQ immediately.

I would start with roughly $3,000, then DCA the remainder over the following months.

If we get another meaningful technology correction, I would accelerate deployment.

That leaves me participating if the market keeps climbing, while preserving ammunition if volatility returns.

🔵 WOULD I DCA ONLY QQQ?

Probably not.

If I were building a long-term portfolio rather than choosing one ETF for this question, I would use something closer to:

60% broad-market ETF such as VOO

30% QQQ

10% individual high-conviction opportunities

VOO becomes the compounding engine.

QQQ provides additional growth exposure.

The final 10% satisfies my desire to actively hunt opportunities without allowing one bad trade to derail the entire portfolio.

That separation is important.

My investing money compounds. My trading money takes calculated risks.

MY ONE PIECE OF ADVICE FOR SOMEONE STARTING DCA

Do not spend too much time asking:

“Is today a good entry?”

Ask instead:

“Can I keep doing this for ten years?”

The biggest advantage of DCA is not finding the perfect ETF or buying at the perfect price.

It is building a system that continues working when you are busy, scared, euphoric or simply not paying attention to markets.

For me, that ETF is QQQ.

But the real investment is the habit.

Automate the boring part. Save extra ammunition for the scary part. Then give compounding time to do its job.

I am not a financial advisor. Trade wisely, Comrades!

VOO, QQQ or both: which ETF are you DCA-ing and why?

If you find this post interesting, give it wings! 🪽 Repost and share the insights.

Do consider ‘Follow me’ and get firsthand read of my daily new post. Thank you. @Tiger_SG  @TigerEvents  @Daily_Discussion  @TigerStars  @TigerPM