To The Moon

📊 Market Recap As of September 29, 2026, Rocket Lab USA, Inc. closed at $72.19, down -2.38%. The stock remains well below its 52-week high of $151.00, trading roughly 52% off that peak, while holding above the 52-week low of $37.57. The recent price action suggests a volatile consolidation phase, with resistance near $91.10 and support around $66.68 from late September. 🚀 Key Drivers Space Infrastructure Sentiment: Investor focus remains on Rocket Lab’s expanding launch cadence and space systems backlog, though no major company-specific catalyst emerged in the latest session. Profit-Taking Pressure: After prior strength, capital flow data shows net outflows in four of the last five sessions, signaling cautious positioning among short-term traders. High Short Interest: The short volume rati

📊 Market Recap As of the close on September 29, 2026 (Eastern Time), 'MRVL' finished at $251.90, down -3.83% on the day. The stock now sits approximately 23.6% below its 52-week high of $329.88, with intraday trading confined to a range of $248.14 to $261.78. Today's decline pushed shares back toward the lower end of a multi-week consolidation zone, signaling increased caution among AI and data-center semiconductor investors. 🚀 Key Drivers Profit-taking after high-level divergence: Recent RSI readings peaked above 77 on the 6-day frame, leaving the stock vulnerable to a sharp pullback once momentum stalled. AI peer valuation reset: Broader semiconductor sentiment cooled as investors rotated out of high-multiple AI names, pressuring 'MRVL' despite stable fundamentals. Short interest decline

📊 Market Recap As of September 29, 2026 (Eastern Time), Meta Platforms, Inc. closed at $715.62, down -4.79% on the day. The stock remains about 8.2% below its 52-week high of $779.82, after an intraday swing from $713.19 to $750.58. The sharp pullback reflects mounting legal and product-safety concerns, even as the AI-driven momentum from the previous week cools. 🚀 Key Drivers New Mexico legal blow: Meta lost a case tied to the Cambridge Analytica data scandal, with the state attorney general seeking civil penalties of up to $219 billion, creating a major overhang on sentiment. Muse security concerns: Meta's AI assistant Muse was reportedly exposed to a security vulnerability that could allow access to users' cloud files and emails, raising doubts about the safety of its next-generation AI

$Meta Platforms, Inc.(META)$   $META Ran 30%+ in September. I'm Selling the $680 Put, Not Chasing the Stock Meta was the loudest name in my feed all month, and for good reason. Muse, its personal AI assistant, launched on Sept 8 and climbed to the top of the US App Store's free charts. Connect 2026 then showed Muse running hands-free on the new Ray-Ban and Oakley glasses. The stock went from the mid-$550s in late August to a 52-week high of $779.82 last Thursday. Piper Sandler, TD Cowen and Canaccord all raised targets this week, into the $865-$950 range. Then Friday reminded everyone that nothing goes up in a straight line. META closed at $751.66, down 3.3% on the day, and slipped another few dollars after hours. I don't want to buy a stock

$Bloom Energy Corp(BE)$ just jumped 8.27% — but the bigger story may be what happens AFTER the GPUs arrive. Everyone has been focused on chips, servers and data centres. But there is another bottleneck becoming increasingly difficult to ignore: ⚡ Power. Bloom Energy is positioning its fuel-cell technology as an onsite power solution for AI data centres, helping operators avoid some of the delays involved in connecting massive new facilities to the traditional grid. And the timing is interesting. Bloom recently unveiled an 800V DC-native power architecture designed around next-generation AI infrastructure. The company says its system can reduce non-compute capital costs for a 1GW AI data centre by $3.6 billion, although those figures are Bloom’s own

For me, a cash-secured put is not simply a strategy to collect premium—it is a commitment to buy a stock at a price I have already decided is attractive. I prefer OTM strikes with enough downside buffer, typically giving myself time for theta to work without taking unnecessary assignment risk. But the biggest lesson is that a high premium often comes with a reason: elevated IV usually means the market expects bigger moves. I also prefer limit orders, especially when spreads are wide. A few cents of execution difference may look insignificant, but repeated across multiple contracts, it adds up. Most importantly, I treat assignment as part of the original plan, not a failure. Before entering, I ask one question: If this stock falls another 30%, would I still be comfortable owning 100 shares

I think Wednesday was a good reminder that rates can temporarily override fundamentals. Strong PMI pushed yields higher, and with the 10-year above 5%, growth and semiconductor stocks faced renewed valuation pressure. I would not treat one red day as a change in the long-term AI thesis. For $Meta Platforms, Inc.(META)$ , I find the Muse monetization angle more interesting than downloads alone. A transaction fee could turn engagement into revenue, but I want to see the actual fee structure and user retention before changing my view. For me, patience matters. I am still comfortable accumulating quality AI and semiconductor names during meaningful pullbacks, but I prefer scaling in gradually rather than chasing strength. Earnings, cash flow and AI m

I find the memory strength interesting because $SanDisk Corp.(SNDK)$ , $Micron Technology(MU)$ and $SK hynix(SKHY)$ all moved higher while the broader chip chain also remained positive. To me, this looks more like money staying within the AI semiconductor theme rather than a simple rotation away from chips. For Micron, the September 30 earnings will be important. I want to see whether margins and guidance can support the current memory-cycle optimism. A strong report could reinforce the thesis, while weaker guidance would make me more cautious. I am still bullish on semiconductors over the longer term, but I prefer to accumulate gradually during pullbacks rather t

🌟🌟🌟 $SanDisk Corp.(SNDK)$ pullback isn't a structural breakdown.  It is a healthy breathing moment for a red hot sector. Beneath yesterday's drop lies an economic reality.  SanDisk latest revenue soared 175% year over year to USD 20.3 billion, with adjusted EPS erupting to USD 70.88. SanDisk has literally signed away two thirds  of next year's manufacturing output to long term enterprise agreements. Yet Wall Street is pricing SanDisk at a conservative forward Price to Earnings (P/E ratio) at just 8 times future profits. For long term investors, a 24% discount from recent all time highs is a gift. Another alternative strategy is to buy $Roundhill Memory ETF(DRAM)$ which includes

The AI Fortress Cracks — 30Y Yields at 5.44% Drag the Mag 7 into the Same Fire That Torched Everything Else One thing has held this market up for months and the legs are getting wobbly. Mega-cap Tech and AI absorbed the capital while everything rate-sensitive got crushed. NVDA, MSFT, AAPL, GOOGL, AMZN, META, AVGO — the Mag 7 and the AI complex (SMCI, ARM, TSM) vacuumed up every free dollar. The rest of the tape? Rate-sensitive cyclicals, regional banks, REITs, homebuilders, small caps — all left for dead. That worked as long as AI stayed insulated from the macro. The 30Y just hit 5.44%, its highest since 2004. Nasdaq futures are down close to a point. That is not a minor tick. When the long end of the curve is screaming like this, duration gets repriced and the high-multiple growth names f

For years, one of the simplest stablecoin theses has been: Money moves onchain → traditional payment rails become less important → Visa and Mastercard get disrupted. Makes sense. But something happened this week that made me question whether we’ve got the second half of that equation wrong. On September 22, SoFi announced it was moving its entire debit and credit card program onto stablecoin settlement using SoFiUSD. Expected annualised volume? More than US$25 billion. But here’s the interesting part. It isn’t bypassing Mastercard. It’s settling through Mastercard’s global payments network. That sent me down a rabbit hole. And I think there might be a much bigger story developing underneath the stablecoin boom. 💳 THE DISRUPTORS ARE MEETING THE TOLL ROADS Stablecoins solve some genuine prob

👟 NIKE (NKE): Turnaround Opportunity or More Pain Ahead? Nike is approaching an important test with Q1 FY2027 earnings on October 1. The iconic sportswear giant is going through one of its most difficult resets in years. FY2026 showed some encouraging signs, but the recovery remains uneven. 📊 Where Nike stands • FY2026 revenue: around $46.4B • Wholesale business has started improving • North America showing signs of stabilization • Nike is rebuilding relationships with wholesale partners • New product innovation and sport-focused strategy remain central to CEO Elliott Hill's turnaround ⚠️ But major challenges remain • Greater China continues to be weak • Nike Direct and digital sales remain under pressure • Gross margins have been hurt by tariffs, discounting and product-mix pressures • Co

$BlackBerry(BB)$ walking for my BB to bring me to the moon!

$Microsoft(MSFT)$ The Ultimate Triple Engine: Microsoft doesn't rely on just one revenue stream. It dominates across three massive pillars:Intelligent Cloud: Azure is one of the world's leading enterprise hyperscalers, growing at an impressive ~40% YoY pace.Productivity & Business Processes: Microsoft 365, LinkedIn, and Dynamics generate massive, non-negotiable subscription revenue from enterprises.More Personal Computing: Windows, Xbox (boosted by Activision Blizzard), and Surface devices handle consumer and hardware tech.🔒 High Switching Costs (The "Moat"): Once a corporation integrates Windows, Office 365, Azure, and active directory infrastructure, leaving is incredibly difficult and expensive. This gives Microsoft immense pricing power.💡

$Palantir Technologies Inc.(PLTR)$ Would you hold on to $Palantir Technologies Inc.(PLTR)$  ? Yes — I would consider Palantir (PLTR) a long-term holding, but I would treat it as a high-growth, high-valuation position, not a core defensive holding like MSFT or GOOGL. The key issue in September 2026 is not whether Palantir’s business is growing — it clearly is. The issue is how much of that future growth is already priced into the stock. Why I like the long-term business Palantir’s latest numbers are unusually strong: * Q2 2026 revenue: $1.935B, +93% YoY * U.S. commercial revenue: +149% YoY * U.S. government revenue: +90% * U.S. commercial remaining deal value: $6.24B, +124% YoY * Adjusted operati

$Qualcomm(QCOM)$ would you trim if you have $Qualcomm(QCOM)$  ? At the current QCOM price around $202, I would trim modestly rather than exit, especially after the sharp move from the $160–180 area. QCOM jumped about 9.3% on Sept. 21 and closed at $201.97 on Sept. 25. Why I’d trim some 1. The recent rally has caught up with near-term valuation.
QCOM is now around 23× trailing earnings / ~20× forward earnings. The current analyst consensus target is about $204, essentially around the market price. 2. The fundamental picture is mixed. The latest quarter showed: * Revenue $9.95B, -4% YoY * Handset revenue -20% * Automotive revenue +61% * Q4 adjusted EPS guidance $2.05–$2.25, below the then-consensu

I don't think the market suddenly discovered dilution a day late. The shares were being sold through an ATM programme, so the dilution was happening gradually and was already known. What changed when the raise was completed was certainty: 29.3 million new shares had actually been issued, raising US$1.94B. That's roughly 5% dilution against Rocket Lab's previous common-share count. Thursday's rally may therefore have been relief that the Iridium financing was secured and the US$3.6B bridge facility could be cancelled. Friday then looked more like the market digesting the other side of that trade: a stronger balance sheet, but more shares dividing the future upside. So I wouldn't say dilution was priced exactly one day late. The market first rewarded financing certainty, then reconsidered w

HOOD is shifting gears — Prediction Markets just overtook Crypto Robinhood just showed something big in the numbers. In Q2, revenue from its prediction markets (event contracts) hit $156 million.
Crypto trading brought in only $100 million. That’s the first time prediction markets have beaten crypto at Robinhood. And a big part of the jump came from Rothera — the CFTC-licensed prediction market exchange they launched with Susquehanna in late May/June. Rothera processed over 3.5 billion contracts in a very short time and quickly became one of the top platforms. World Cup volume helped a lot, and now football season is kicking in. Management is routing more and more flow through Rothera so they keep a bigger piece of the economics instead of sharing it with third-party exchanges. This is not