From a valuation perspective this market is divided into the Bigs (top 100) and the Big-Nots (everyone else). If you’re big you attract all the flows, have a much lower cost of capital (aka very high valuations), you suck up a lot of small companies through M&A, and to be fair if you got big in the first place you probably have pretty decent earnings and growth. If you’re small you’re off the radar, under-covered, under-valued, under-performing and probably underestimated. And even if you’re large —but not the largest, you still trade at a discount to the largest companies. As alluded, this is partly selection effects (successful companies get big), but also reinforced by the relentless rise of passive/index investing. But where things are sitting now is what you would call extreme. An