Top-Down vs. Bottom-Up Investing: Which One Suits You?
This week the market delivered a full-blown roller coaster: consecutive selloffs, extreme fear, a sharp rally followed by a crash on Thursday, and a weak open with a shaky rebound on Friday that barely closed in the green.
$NVIDIA(NVDA)$ earnings “failed to save the market,” U.S. equities were dumped across the board, and even Fed officials had to come out repeatedly to calm investors.
Amid the waves of panic, tech stocks finally showed a bit of stabilization. But the reality is simple: most investors ended this week in the red.
Whenever the market enters a violent correction, an old question always comes back:
Are you better suited for top-down investing or bottom-up investing?
🔍 What Is Top-Down Investing?
Top-down logic is straightforward:
Start with the macro → interest rates, inflation, GDP, policy shifts
Then look at sectors → which sectors benefit in the current cycle?
Finally choose your stocks or ETFs.
In an extreme week like this, a top-down approach often suggests adjusting exposure: reducing positions, hedging, or shifting to defense — all based on macro signals.
🔍 What Is Bottom-Up Investing?
Bottom-up thinking flips the order:
Start with the company → earnings, valuation, moat, growth drivers
Macro is just “background noise.”
These investors believe: “If the company is truly great, short-term volatility doesn’t matter.” They’re often long-term buy-and-hold types who love deep company research.
In a week of steep declines, bottom-up investors might actually see opportunity: high-quality companies dumped in panic, and “bargains” starting to emerge.
If you have cash and the ability to do deep research, this type of environment can feel like hunting season.
So Which Strategy Fits You?
The truth is, it’s not a binary choice. In practice, both approaches can and should coexist. Just like Merrill Lynch’s Investment Clock suggests, the economy moves through cycles, and your strategy needs to move with it.
In a market like this, what matters more — the “big picture” or “stock picking”?
Are you better suited for top-down investing or bottom-up investing?
Leave your comments to win tiger coins & vouchers!
Click here to view the event detail: Weekly Top Contributor (10 - 16 Nov): New Week, New Winners🐯 Check Our New Scheme!
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.
I use a top down view to determine the current macro economic factors & determine which sectors to invest in. Eg: I would lean into defensive sectors if a recession is looming such as consumer staples.
Once I have chosen the sector, I switch to a bottom up approach, to select companies that are most likely to outperform their peers. Eg: Under consumer staples I would select $Coca-Cola(KO)$ which has a wide brand moat.
By using both Top down and Bottom up approach, I have the best of both worlds. It is not about perfect predictions but about robust risk management and balanced conviction.
The best approach is ultimately the one that allows me to remain disciplined and rational when volatility is at the highest.
In adopting a blended approach, I would be to seize opportunities and be a better investor.
@Tiger_comments @TigerStars @Tiger_SG @TigerClub @CaptainTiger
Are you better suited for top-down investing or bottom-up investing?
Leave your comments to win tiger coins & vouchers!
@koolgal @SPACE ROCKET @nomadic_m @GoodLife99 @Shyon @Aqa @HelenJanet @rL @Universe宇宙 @Barcode @Zarkness @LMSunshine
但與此同時，我也不能忽視自下而上的基本面。當恐慌襲來，所有東西都被不分青紅皁白地出售時，我就開始關注那些無緣無故被拖累的高質量名字。如果公司的長期故事是可靠的，短期波動就會變得不那麼可怕，而更像是一個機會。
所以對我來說，最好的方法是兩者結合。我使用自上而下的信號來調整敞口並在宏觀動盪期間保護自己，並使用自下而上的研究來利用錯誤定價的機會。
@Tiger_comments @TigerStars
Hence, it would involved both ultimately.
Bottom-Up Investing during boom time!
During geopolitical crisis one can use the top-down approach to identify the promising sectors and selects specific stocks. Whereas in prosperity time when economy is generally stable, bottom-up approach focuses on company fundamentals which enable one to acquire undervalued stocks with great fundamentals. Thanks @Tiger_comments @icycrystal @TigerStars @Tiger_SG Thanks for tag!
The big picture is not so controllable IMHO. Especially recent geo political environment changes fast.
But it is best if we have the discipline to spread out the risk & be patient.
Check them in the history - “community distribution“
对我来说，还是那句话：积累现金，等待市场地震后再开银行账户，继续买入...
当前交易策略：波段交易