Big Bank Earnings Recap: Trump Policy Risk! Is Financial Still a Buy?

The January 2026 earnings season has started on a rough note for U.S. banks.

All major US banks have now reported their results. Although each bank has a different business focus, increasing short-term spending on future technologies, particularly AI, has become an industry-wide consensus.

However, the market’s reaction has been notably pragmatic: tolerance for rising expenses is fading, and the test of ROI (return on investment) has officially begun.

Management teams repeatedly emphasized AI, data centers, and automation as long-term necessities. But the market is no longer rewarding spending on trust alone.

Big bank earnings brief

  1. $Bank of America(BAC)$ delivered both EPS and revenue beats, supported by strong equity trading and a ~10% YoY increase in net interest income.
    Still, the stock recorded its worst earnings-day reaction since 2020.

  2. $JPMorgan Chase(JPM)$ missed expectations, with softer debt underwriting activity weighing on results.

  3. $Wells Fargo(WFC)$ missed across EPS, revenue, and NII, burdened by $612 million in severance costs.

  4. $Citigroup(C)$ reported lower earnings due to Russia exit losses, though investment banking fees surged 35%.

Despite very different business mixes, all four stocks sold off.

The split screen: MS and GS offer a different playbook

$Morgan Stanley(MS)$ delivered a clean “wealth management + investment banking recovery” story:

Q4 net revenue $17.89B (above expectations), full-year revenue a record $70.6B; EPS $2.68 (well above $2.44 expected)

Wealth management revenue $8.43B (+13%) with strong net new assets; Investment banking revenue +47%

$Goldman Sachs(GS)$ showed core strength but with a noisy headline:

Q4 net profit $4.62B (+12%), EPS $14.01 (+17%)

Equities trading $4.31B, a Wall Street record; Investment banking revenue +25%

But revenue optics were hit by one-off accounting impacts tied to the Apple card transition to JPM, dragging the platform solutions segment

Trump policy risk: JPMorgan says "Everything' on Table to fight 10% card cap

Trump’s proposal to cap credit card interest rates at 10% starting in 2026 immediately raised alarm.

Combined with lingering uncertainty around Federal Reserve leadership, policy risk has become a second headwind on top of earnings scrutiny.

Bank stocks have become a macro + policy + execution trade, not a simple earnings trade.

How are you trading this earnings season?

Which of the six major U.S. banks do you favor?

With Citigroup and Wells Fargo both announcing layoffs alongside increased AI investment, do you believe these moves can translate into long-term profitability?

Broadly, large banks now fall into two narratives:

  • Buying higher-certainty names such as Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, and Bank of America, or

  • Positioning for transformation stories, including JPMorgan’s Apple Card exposure, and the restructuring paths at Citigroup and Wells Fargo.

Which camp are you in — certainty or transformation?

Leave your comments to win tiger coins~

# Big Bank Earnings Recap: AI Divergence, MS is the Winner?

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Report

Comment25

  • Top
  • Latest
  • Shyon
    ·01-15 23:53
    TOP
    This earnings season confirms my view that bank stocks are now judged on execution and near-term ROI, not AI spending narratives. Automation and data investment are necessary, but the market is done rewarding long-term promises amid policy and rate uncertainty.

    From a trading standpoint, I favor higher-certainty names. Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs stand out with clearer earnings drivers, while Bank of America remains structurally sound despite a harsh market reaction.

    For transformation stories like JPMorgan, Citigroup, and Wells Fargo, I see potential but higher execution risk. Layoffs and AI investment may lift efficiency over time, but for now I stay in the “certainty” camp, watching for clearer inflection points.

    @koolgal @rL @icycrystal @nomadic_m @1PC @SPACE ROCKET @Michane @GoodLife99

    Reply
    Report
    Fold Replies
    • ShyonReplying toicycrystal
      [Great] [Great] [Great]
      01-16 15:35
      Reply
      Report
    • icycrystal
      thanks for sharing
      01-16 12:36
      Reply
      Report
  • Michane
    ·01-16 00:29
    TOP
    u might be surprised I don't trade banks nowadays [LOL]
    Rather I have holdings like $Sheng Siong(OV8.SI)$ when it was still $1+
    it is currently the winner 🏆 of my SG stocks!
    Reply
    Report
  • 這是甚麼東西
    ·01-16 14:47
    TOP
    Citigroup (C)

    Citigroup is undertaking a significant restructuring plan that involves eliminating 20,000 jobs by 2026 as part of a cost-cutting initiative expected to yield $2-$2.5 billion in annual savings. The bank has already reduced its headcount by over 10,000 employees.

    Citigroup is aggressively deploying Al tools to support these efficiency efforts, aiming to streamline processes, improve data quality, and drive automation across its operations. Its internal Al tools are freeing up approximately 100,000 developer hours per week, and nearly 180,000 employees have access to these Al capabilities.The bank also has an annual technology budget of $12 billion, suggesting significant funding for Al integration.

    Reply
    Report
  • icycrystal
    ·01-16 12:40
    如果我换确定性,我可能会关注标普500的横向盘整。

    如果我换转型,我正在关注专业技术的积极增长和硬资产的突破。

    我能两者兼得吗[Sly][Sly][Sly]

    Reply
    Report
  • L.Lim
    ·01-16 00:15
    I am certain... that they will cause the next global recession 😂
    US banks doing the same old tired play, finance a bubble carelessly, refuse to follow rules and believing that they are too large to fail. Then beg for handouts when things go south.
    I would not like to be holding the bag when the bubble pops because it will be as ugly as the dot-com bubble and the real estate bubble.
    Greed, it's always greed blinding these people. Play by the rules and things might just turn out ok, but no... they will resort to any means to have the regulations removed.
    Hopefully investors have indeed learned the lesson and figuratively whacked the banks' knuckles for being careless.
    Reply
    Report
  • koolgal
    ·01-16 14:58
    🌟🌟Certainty or Transformation?  The banks are split into 2 narratives. 

    Transformation: Citi & Wells Fargo announcing layoffs while increasing their AI investments, signal a familiar pattern in banking: streamline cost base, modernise infrastructure & hope the transformation is successful. 

    These moves can translate into long term profitability but the payoff depends on execution & whether legacy systems can be merged well.

    High potential, high complexity.

    Certainty: Certainty names like Goldman Sachs & Bank of America operate like wellrun machines.  Predictable earnings &diversified revenue streams.They are steady, reliable & less dramatic.

    Which camp am I in?

    Neither. I am in the disciplined camp. 

    I don't chase narratives. I don't pick favourites. I let $Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund(XLF)$ do the heavy lifting.

    Certainty is comfortable.  Transformation is exciting.  Disciplined allocation is where the long term returns are built.

    @Tiger_comments @TigerStars

    Reply
    Report
  • Mkoh
    ·01-16 11:31
    简而言之:2026年可能不是一笔好交易——至少现在还不是。拟议的信用卡利率10%上限将严重损害该领域收入最高的公司(想想第一资本、美国运通、Discover,甚至一些大银行的信用卡部门)。这对他们利润率最高的业务来说是一个巨大的打击,当特朗普推出该业务时,市场已经消化了相当丑陋的反应。如果上限真的获得通过并持续一整年,我预计这些名字会带来更多痛苦和更低的市盈率。另一方面,如果它被淡化、推迟或在国会/官僚机构中被悄然扼杀(这是很有可能的),那么股市可能会从这些低迷水平大幅反弹。现在感觉更像是一场高风险的“淡化恐惧”游戏,而不是干净的看涨设置。在26年积极做多大型发卡机构之前,我会等待更多情况明朗。你怎么看——你倾向于逢低买入还是远离?

    Reply
    Report
  • 北极篂
    ·01-16 09:10
    至于裁员+AI投资能否带来长期盈利,我的判断是:能,但只会集中在执行力最强、商业模式最清晰的银行身上。因此,我更偏向“确定性阵营”,优先选择MS、GS这类已经证明模式有效的名字,而不是去赌转型能否顺利落地。在这个阶段,不确定性,本身就是最大的成本。
    Reply
    Report
  • 北极篂
    ·01-16 09:10
    真正让我更谨慎的,是政策风险的重新定价。信用卡利率上限、监管取向、美联储人事不确定性,让银行股不再是单纯的“财报交易”,而更像一场宏观+政策+执行力的综合博弈。
    Reply
    Report
  • 北极篂
    ·01-16 09:10
    相比之下,摩根士丹利和高盛给出了完全不同的剧本。MS的财富管理飞轮清晰可见,新增资产和投行业务同步回暖,这是我认为当前环境下最“可预测”的增长路径。高盛依然展现了交易和投行的硬实力,只是一次性因素让财报“噪音”变大,但核心竞争力并未动摇。
    Reply
    Report
  • 北极篂
    ·01-16 09:10
    从结果看,传统大行的处境最为尴尬。美国银行盈利和收入都超预期,却交出了数年来最差的财报日表现,说明“稳健但没惊喜”已经不够。摩根大通和富国银行的问题更直接:投行业务和成本控制同时承压,任何一端失速,市场都会毫不留情地惩罚。花旗则再次提醒投资人,它的风险并不只来自业务周期,还有地缘政治与历史包袱。
    Reply
    Report
  • 北极篂
    ·01-16 09:09
    如果说这个财报季给了我什么最直观的感受,那就是:市场对美国大银行的耐心,正在快速消耗。几乎所有管理层都在谈人工智能、自动化、数据中心,但股价反应却异常冷淡,甚至“越好越跌”。这不是否定AI的重要性,而是投资人开始真正追问:钱花下去,什么时候能看到回报?
    Reply
    Report
  • Couchman
    ·01-16 06:15
    Despite some good results, we are at a point in the cycle where all the banks are historically expensive so i am out of banks for now until the valuations come back down
    Reply
    Report
  • Chrishust
    ·01-16 03:20
    $Goldman Sachs(GS)$ $JPMorgan Chase(JPM)$ $Bank of America(BAC)$ there is a lot to like about the banks performance at this time in the economic cycle. With high growth in the economy in the United States, there is a strong positive investor sentiment for banking stocks with strong momentum. This results in a high likelihood of price growth for each of the banks. Within this list of banks. The banks with greater commercial exposure are likely to outperform $Goldman Sachs(GS)$ benefiting from deal making in the economy. In terms of lower prospects. The real estate exposed banks $Bank of America(BAC)$ may lag the more higher performing stocks
    Reply
    Report
  • T20211222001
    ·01-15 23:49
    I'm betting on certainty, like Morgan Stanley. Transformation is too dicey with Trump's policies looming. [看涨]
    Reply
    Report
  • AliceSam
    ·01-15 23:48
    $美国银行(BAC)$在强劲的股票交易和净利息收入同比增长约10%的支持下,每股收益和收入均超出预期。
    Reply
    Report
  • PhoebeReade
    ·01-15 23:48
    BAC for certainty camp! Transformation too dicey with policy risks. [得意]
    Reply
    Report
  • highhand
    ·01-16 00:03
    financials don't have to be just banks. can be companies like $BlackRock(BLK)$ , $MasterCard(MA)$ , or seven $S&P Global(SPGI)$ . yes they can go up up up
    Reply
    Report
  • ECLC
    ·01-16 10:11
    对美国银行公布的一些收益感到惊讶,不确定性仍然存在。
    Reply
    Report
  • LucasOng
    ·01-16 00:12
    银行是金融市场的支柱。只要是一家信誉良好的银行。还能买'
    Reply
    Report