Musk Confirmed Terafab Talks With TSMC. Why Is Intel the One Falling?

The indices: the Nasdaq set a record close, the Dow did not follow

The three indices pulled apart on Monday: the $NASDAQ(.IXIC)$ Composite rose 1.05 per cent to 27,477.31, a record close for it, having reached 27,544.06 at its intraday peak; the $S&P 500(.SPX)$ rose 0.66 per cent to 7,773.95, still shy of its own record close by less than 0.6 per cent; and the $Dow Jones(.DJI)$ Industrial Average added just 0.18 per cent to 51,267.90. The 10-year Treasury yield closed at 5.31 per cent, three basis points above Friday.

Put those three together and what made the high was not the breadth of the market but a handful of very large technology names. The Dow rose less than a third as much as the S&P, which still has ground to recover before its own peak. Two paths follow. Should the leaders keep climbing and the gap to the Dow stop widening, this is a move driven by earnings expectations, and a higher policy rate matters less. Should the Dow keep falling further behind, the money is simply crowding into the narrowest corner of the market, and if those few names pause the index has no second leg. The thing to watch is whether the Dow's gain catches up again over the next few days.

Hard drives: Western Digital and Seagate recovered, SanDisk and Micron still fell

The two drive makers sold off on Friday clawed back most of it on Monday: Western Digital rose 6.34 per cent to US$441.64 and Seagate 4.49 per cent to US$887.09. The trigger was a positive response from the sell side — Bernstein called the market's panic over Toshiba's expansion a storm in a teacup, kept its overweight ratings on both Western Digital and Seagate, and judged that the industry is still nowhere near meeting demand.

Two others in the same group did not follow: $SanDisk Corp.(SNDK)$ fell 0.92 per cent to US$1,704.16 and $Micron Technology(MU)$ 1.02 per cent to US$1,063.96. Both the fall and the recovery sit with those two drive names, which says the money coming in on Monday was buying a level that had fallen too far, not a changed view on the whole group. Two paths follow. Should SanDisk and Micron start catching up, the Toshiba report was a burst of sentiment and the shortage premise is untouched. Should they never follow, Monday was a rebound within a downtrend and the real disagreement is still where it was. The thing to watch is whether SanDisk and Micron catch up this week.

Foundries: Tesla's chip project turned to TSMC, Intel fell alone

$Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing(TSM)$ rose 2.75 per cent to US$485.80, having reached US$487.46 at its intraday peak, a 52-week high. The push came from Tesla's chief executive confirming early talks over Terafab, and the counterparty is TSMC. In the same news, SpaceX rose 7.63 per cent to US$171.09.

$Intel(INTC)$ went the other way, down 2.63 per cent at US$116.19 and the only clear laggard among these semiconductor names. Until now it had been the only named foundry partner in Musk's chip project, and the talks were read as squeezing that position. What is public so far is the phrase "early talks" and nothing else — no sum, no capacity, no timetable. Two paths follow. Should what lands be a contract with capacity and a term attached, TSMC is collecting a toll that can be counted. Should the talks stay at an early stage with no follow-through, Monday's gain has to be given back. The thing to watch is whether there is a formal disclosure on the next step.

Cerebras: Altman publicly called it a close partner and the shares rebounded

$Cerebras Systems(CBRS)$ rose 9.08 per cent to US$181.55. The trigger was OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman publicly calling it a close partner, which pushed down the question the market had been most worried about. The pressure came earlier: a tweet from SemiAnalysis had weakened the stock, with the concern centred on its demand position in this race. Its 52-week range runs from US$160.81 to US$386.34, and the price sits not far above the bottom of it.

Within a single day, a valuation knocked down by a tweet and pulled back up by a sentence, which says what prices this company is still the story rather than verifiable orders and deliveries. Two paths follow. Should specific supply arrangements appear next, Altman's sentence has something to be checked against and the price holds. Should there be only the sentence and nothing after it, this rebound is still travelling on the story and goes back the moment the wind turns. The thing to watch is whether the company puts out order or supply figures.

Power: the Energy Department confirmed a nuclear loan and Vistra closed higher

$Vistra Energy Corp.(VST)$ rose 3.48 per cent to US$144.89. The push was the US Department of Energy confirming a nuclear loan of about US$4.2 billion to expand nuclear generation. The backdrop is that data-centre electricity demand has pushed power assets back to the centre of pricing, and the names bracketed with it are Constellation, NextEra and NRG.

The money points at expanding generation, and the buyers of that power are data centres on long contracts, so the cash flow is more visible than for an ordinary utility asset. On the other side, a loan becoming generation means a construction cycle in between, and the current price already has several years of demand growth in it. Two paths follow. Should the data-centre power commitments be met on schedule, this line has something physical under the price. Should those commitments slip, the valuation moves first. The thing to watch is the price at which these power companies sign their next round of long-term supply agreements.

This is personal analysis and not investment advice.

💬 【Talking Point】

The $Dow Jones(.DJI)$ added 0.18 per cent on the day the $NASDAQ(.IXIC)$ set a record close. Would you rather own the index here, or the handful of names carrying it?

💰 【Bounty】

Drop your view in the comments and there are Tiger Coins in it for you! 🎁

🔔 Better shared than saved — tag a friend and split the coins!

# Musk Confirms Terafab Talking to TSMC; Why Is Intel the Lone Decliner?

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Report

Comment(16)

  • Top
  • Latest
  • MHh
    ·10-06 18:08
    TOP
    The individual stocks have been really volatile lately. I definitely prefer to hold the index to save myself from the anxiety. I do have a long investment horizon of at least 20 years, so buying the index is a safer and stress-free option. @Success88 @HelenJanet @Fenger1188 @LuckyPiggie @SPOT_ON @SR050321 @Wayneqq @Universe宇宙 @Kaixiang @DiAngel come join
    Reply
    Report
    Fold Replies
  • Universe宇宙
    ·10-07 11:50
    TOP
    A rising tide won't lift all boats. Alpha comes from selecting moat-heavy compounders over speculative hype riders.

    @MHh @koolgal @rL @icycrystal @Shyon

    Reply
    Report
    Fold Replies
  • Jerry Lam
    ·10-06 18:57
    我更倾向于 拥有“几个名字”,而不是现在直接买整个指数。

    原因是当前市场结构太明显了:纳指创新高,但道指只涨0.18%,说明真正拉动指数的还是少数大市值科技股。

    在10年期美债收益率仍在 5%以上 的环境里,我更愿意挑那些能用盈利和现金流扛住高贴现率的公司,而不是把资金平均分给整个市场。

    我会重点看三类:

    第一,AI算力和代工:NVDA、TSM;
    第二,真正有订单和现金流支撑的数据中心基础设施;
    第三,能持续上修盈利预期的龙头,而不是单纯靠估值扩张的公司。

    现在最大的风险不是指数创新高,而是 市场宽度没有同步创新高。如果后面道指、小盘股、等权指数开始补涨,那我会更愿意买指数;但如果还是少数科技龙头一路抬着指数走,我宁愿继续精选个股。

    一句话:指数创新高不等于所有股票都在牛市,现在更像“买对公司”比“买整个市场”重要。

    Reply
    Report
  • D1ane
    ·10-06 17:20
    I’d take the index here. The big names may keep leading, but the concentration adds risk. Owning the index gives exposure to the leaders while still leaving room to benefit if market breadth improves
    Reply
    Report
  • Lanceljx
    ·10-07 11:15
    I’d rather own the index here.

    The handful of mega-cap leaders may continue outperforming, but buying them after a strong run means accepting much greater concentration and valuation risk. If earnings or guidance disappoint, the same stocks carrying the market could also lead the correction.

    An index lets me participate in the AI and tech rally while retaining exposure to financials, industrials, healthcare and other sectors that could take over leadership if the rally broadens.

    I wouldn’t completely avoid the winners, but I prefer them as part of a diversified portfolio rather than making a concentrated bet.

    At record highs, diversification may look boring, but I’m happy to trade some upside for less single-stock risk. 📈

    Reply
    Report
  • Shyon
    ·10-06 23:45
    I would rather own the index while selectively holding the strongest names. The Nasdaq hitting a record shows strong tech leadership, but the narrow market also means higher concentration risk. I am still bullish on the long-term AI trend, but I do not want to chase momentum blindly.

    I am watching semiconductors and AI infrastructure closely, but I prefer confirmation over headlines. I would rather wait for pullbacks and scale in gradually than make a large move after a strong rally.

    My approach remains DCA and adding gradually. The market can stay strong even when leadership is narrow, but I want to see broader participation before becoming more aggressive. For me, consistency and patience matter more than catching every short-term move.

    @TigerStars @Marktomarket @Tiger_comments @TigerClub

    Reply
    Report
  • 吉3186
    ·10-06 21:45
    My view:
    Nasdaq hitting a new high while the Dow lags shows that money is mainly flowing into a few big tech stocks. If those leaders stop rising, the market could become fragile.
    The 10-year Treasury yield at 5.31% is still a major pressure. High rates usually hurt expensive growth stocks.
    Hard drives: Western Digital and Seagate rebounded, but SanDisk and Micron did not. This suggests the market is still not fully convinced about the long-term shortage story.
    TSMC vs Intel: If Tesla really gives chip capacity to TSMC, TSMC could benefit. But it is still only an “early discussion,” not a confirmed order.
    Cerebras: A big move based mainly on one comment shows the stock is still driven heavily by the story. That makes it risky.
    Power stocks: I like this long-term theme. AI data centers need huge amounts of electricity, so nuclear and power companies could benefit. But valuations already include a lot of expectations.
    For a conservative long-term investor:
    I would not chase the ma
    Reply
    Report
  • Kentzw
    ·10-06 17:11
    I’d still take the index. If the market leaders keep delivering strong earnings, the index benefits — and if leadership broadens out, even better. The bigger question now is whether the rally can spread beyond the usual names.
    Reply
    Report
  • popzi
    ·10-06 16:42
    For long-only index holders, this kind of narrow lift is fine until weight concentration starts doing all the work. I would lean index over the hero names here, but breadth needs to catch up
    Reply
    Report
  • Alfano
    ·10-07 08:31
    just invest in s&p 500, buy when it drop or crash.. [Smile]
    Reply
    Report
  • Success88
    ·10-06 19:35
    Invest in TSMC good company
    Reply
    Report
  • 琉璃思索
    ·10-07 01:07
    MNGA
    Reply
    Report
  • Isleigh
    ·10-06 19:12
    There is still value in owning individual stock if you have the appetite for some risk. Read my take here:

    https://tigr.link/s/50JWuXd

    Reply
    Report