4.62K
·
10-20
$CRCL 20261120 125.0 CALL$ Selling covered calls for the covered that will be expiring
CRCL CALL
10-20 22:52
US20261120 125.0
| Side | Price | Filled | Realized P&L |
|---|---|---|
| Sell Open | 0.80 3Lot(s) | +68.75% Holding |
TOPWayneEvans: 130 would leave a bit more upside open. That 125 strike gets called away fast if CRCL squeezes.
2.81K
·
10-20
$MARA 20261106 9.5 CALL$ Covered call. Selling on a daily basis whether stock is up or down. Trying to create a dca
MARA CALL
10-20 23:01
US20261106 9.5
| Side | Price | Filled | Realized P&L |
|---|---|---|
| Sell Open | 0.17 30Lot(s) | +82.36% Holding |
TOPDaily call selling works, but delta drifts fast on MARA. Theta helps, though at this IV I care more about roll timing than forcing it every day
6.30K
·
10-20
$Hasbro(HAS)$ 🐶📈 OPTIONS PUPPY: Hasbro Beats Earnings — Why I Am Adding to My Existing Position! 1️⃣ Why am I making this trade now? 🎲💰 I have been holding Hasbro (HAS), and after seeing its latest earnings results, I decided to add to my existing position. For me, this is not simply about a toy company selling toys. I am looking at the strength of its brands, its gaming business and its ability to turn intellectual property into recurring revenue. 📊 The numbers are worth paying attention to! According to my trading platform’s earnings screenshot, Hasbro reported quarterly revenue of US$1.60 billion against estimates of US$1.48 billion. Earnings per share came in at US$2.90, compared with expectations of US$1.857
TOPThat 56% EPS beat is hard to ignore, but the bigger shift for me is IP monetization finally looking less sluggish. If digital gaming keeps carrying margin, the story changes a lot.
5.09K
·
10-20
$IAU 20261030 77.5 PUT$ 🖤💗 BLINK FANS: How I Scalp IAU Gold Options for a Quick Profit! 🪙📈 💗 1. Why I Bought IAU PUT Options Today, I decided to trade IAU, the gold ETF, using options rather than buying or selling the ETF shares directly. My strategy was simple: look for a short-term opportunity, enter at a reasonable price and take profit when the market gave me a chance. I bought one IAU $77.50 put option expiring on 30 October at $0.83. A put option generally increases in value when the underlying asset falls, although its price also depends on time remaining, implied volatility and other factors. My trade was not a prediction that gold would collapse. I was looking for a short-term move that I could trade carefully. 📊 2
TOPThat 77.68 to 78.08 fade was clean for a scalp. The 5 min EMA squeeze mattered more than the $7 win lol
3.68K
·
10-20
$DAL CALENDAR 261023/261106 CALL 82.0/CALL 82.0$ DAL: Take profit. the current covered call expiring this Fri are almost exhausted with little remaining premium. Decided to roll out early with same strike of $82 and further by 2 more weeks to 6th Nov to collect a bit more premium. Defensive position as the underlying stock is in paper loss.
DAL Calendar
10-20 22:20
US82.0/82.0
| Side | Price | Filled | Realized P&L |
|---|---|---|
| Credit Close | -0.75 1 | -- Closed |
TOPDefensive maybe, but two more weeks for a little premium does not fix paper loss. Feels more like kicking the can unless DAL can reclaim 82 fast
6.14K
·
10-21
$Quanta(PWR)$ 📉 Why I Am Buying Quanta Services (PWR): Looking for Opportunity in the Sell-Off 🐶 1️⃣ My Reason for Buying PWR I am looking at Quanta Services (PWR) because I believe a sharp price decline can sometimes create an opportunity for investors who are willing to look beyond short-term market sentiment. From my chart, PWR is trading at around $600.82, down 2.84%, after falling from a recent high of approximately $722.21. That is a significant pullback, and I want to understand whether the market is offering me a more attractive entry price. ⚡ 2️⃣ Why I Am Interested in Quanta Services Quanta Services operates in infrastructure services, including electrical power systems, grid modernisation and related energy infrastructure. I am inte
TOPThat drop from 722 to 600 is real, but I still care more about whether cash flow can justify this setup. If FCF stays tight, 587 may not be the floor everyone wants
1.11K
·
10-21
$TSLA 20261023 305.0 PUT$ TSLA: take profit. this short put is one leg of a multi leg double ratio strategy. Overall profitable trade and I'm closing these leg by leg to improve my chances of closing profitable one first at better pricing. Closing all these ahead of earning to avoid volatile binary outcome that might jeopardise the trade profits.
TSLA PUT
10-21 00:47
US20261023 305.0
| Side | Price | Filled | Realized P&L |
|---|---|---|
| Buy Close | 0.12 2Lot(s) | +94.16% Closed |
TOP305 put into earnings is fair to peel off. I care more about the vol pop on the same expiry calls now 👀
1.13K
·
10-21
$GRBK 20261120 55.0 PUT$ For Green Brick Partners (GRBK) watchlist , the latest consensus revenue forecast is $469.4 million for 2026Q3 , based on 3 analysts. The forecast range is $461.3 million–$479.3 million , and consensus implies 2.3% year-over-year growth . For full-year 2026, consensus expects revenue of $1.915 billion (3 analysts), implying an 8.7% decline from the reported $2.098 billion in 2025 . The full-year forecast range is $1.889 billion–$1.943 billion . Information is for reference only and does not constitute investment advice.
GRBK PUT
10-21 00:59
US20261120 55.0
| Side | Price | Filled | Realized P&L |
|---|---|---|
| Sell Open | 0.54 1Lot(s) | +62.97% Holding |
TOPThat 2026 revenue guide barely matters for this put pricing. IV and near term vol are doing way more work here
4.42K
·
10-21
$GSL 20261120 40.0 PUT$ Conditional view: Global Ship Lease (GSL) watchlist looks attractive on valuation and income, but I would treat it as a cyclical value opportunity rather than a straightforward growth buy. The core appeal is a profitable, cash-generative containership lessor trading below book value; the key offset is that consensus expects earnings to decline through 2027 and the share price is in a short- and medium-term downtrend. Valuation/income are compelling. At $40.76 on 2026-10-21, GSL trades at 3.98x trailing P/E , 4.11x forward P/E , and 0.75x book value —a 25.00% discount to book . The indicated dividend yield is 6.13% , with quarterly payments; the latest $0.625/share quarterly dividend annualizes to $2
GSL PUT
10-21 00:57
US20261120 40.0
| Side | Price | Filled | Realized P&L |
|---|---|---|
| Sell Open | 1.20 1Lot(s) | +45.84% Holding |
TOPThat 24.39% payout does leave cushion, but capex and facility draws are where I’d stay picky. Next print probably needs to show free cash flow still covering the dividend cleanly.
593
·
10-21
$GSL 20261120 37.0 PUT$ GSL — what's driving the recent move Short answer: the recent move is a pullback, not a rally. Global Ship Lease (GSL) watchlist has fallen from ~USD 45.19 on 2026-10-13 to USD 40.85 (as of 2026-10-21, intraday), about -9.6% in five sessions and -12.3% from its 52-week high of USD 46.57 (2026-09-17). The decline looks catalyst-light on the company side and more like a combination of a shipping-sector de-rating plus a run of insider sales — while the fundamental news flow over the same window was actually constructive.
GSL PUT
10-21 01:04
US20261120 37.0
| Side | Price | Filled | Realized P&L |
|---|---|---|
| Sell Open | 0.35 1Lot(s) | +51.43% Holding |
TOP12.3% off the high still looks normal for shipping beta, not some company-specific break. The insider sales headline just made the de-rating feel nastier lol
2.19K
·
10-21
$CLSK 20261023 8.0 PUT$ Recent news flow for CleanSpark (CLSK) watchlist is mixed, with the bigger near-term concern being execution and financing rather than a clear deterioration in its core mining business. Bullish developments AI/data-center optionality: Reports describe CleanSpark as expanding beyond Bitcoin mining into data-center infrastructure tied to a Meta-related project. That can diversify the company away from pure Bitcoin-price exposure if the project is delivered and contracted as expected. East Money Financing demand was present: A reported roughly US$2.28 billion five-year high-yield bond offering was said to have drawn about US$10 billion of orders—about 4.4× the deal size—showing investors were willing t
CLSK PUT
10-21 00:38
US20261023 8.0
| Side | Price | Filled | Realized P&L |
|---|---|---|
| Sell Open | 0.09 1Lot(s) | -- Closed |
TOP23.11 implies a huge gap from 8.58, but that spread mostly screams execution discount to me. The Meta-linked data center economics need to get concrete before that target means much
832
·
10-21
$CLSK 20261023 8.0 PUT$ CleanSpark (CLSK) — Outlook Bottom line (conditional): CLSK is a high-beta, story-driven name that has just been repriced hard to the downside — down ~44% from its late-September high and sitting near the bottom of its 52-week range. The near-term path hinges far more on the funding cost of its AI/datacenter pivot and on bitcoin's price than on the mining business itself. The fundamental picture is currently weak (large losses, negative margins, rising leverage), while sell-side consensus remains nominally bullish but has been repeatedly wrong-footed by the price.
CLSK PUT
10-21 01:02
US20261023 8.0
| Side | Price | Filled | Realized P&L |
|---|---|---|
| Sell Open | 0.09 1Lot(s) | -- Closed |
TOPCalling it weak now misses the point — transition capex is the whole bet here, not a bug
756
·
10-21
$TEX 20261120 65.0 CALL$ Terex (TEX) — What's Going On Bottom line: Terex is a beaten-down industrial name that has just put in a sharp two-day bounce off its lows. The stock is up 3.35% today at $52.46 (as of 2026-10-21), following a +3.4% session on 2026-10-20 — but it is still down ~24% over the past 60 trading days and sitting at just the 32.6th percentile of its 52-week range. The move looks like a relief rally into next week's Q3 print rather than a change in the underlying trend.
TEX CALL
10-21 01:25
US20261120 65.0
| Side | Price | Filled | Realized P&L |
|---|---|---|
| Sell Open | 0.28 1Lot(s) | -25.00% Holding |
TOP52.5 isn't some clean reversal to me. Into Q3, short covering can squeeze this another 5-8%, then the real test is backlog and FCF.
1.84K
·
10-21
$TEX 20261120 65.0 CALL$ Calculator [ symbol:TEX|Terex (TEX)] is moving more like a volatile rebound within a recent sell-off than a clean, news-driven rerating. Latest move: TEX was quoted at US$52.58, up 3.58% in the latest session snapshot. However, the volume ratio was only 0.58 , so turnover was below its usual pace; that makes the bounce less convincing as a broad institutional repricing. Recent path: It rose from US$54.94 on 2026-10-01 to an intraperiod high of US$58.41 on 2026-10-06 —a 6.32% move—then fell to US$50.67 on 2026-10-09 , a 13.25% decline from that high. The current upswing therefore appears to be a recovery after a sharp reset, not a sustained uptrend yet. What likely drove the weakness: Truist cut its
TEX CALL
10-21 01:31
US20261120 65.0
| Side | Price | Filled | Realized P&L |
|---|---|---|
| Sell Open | 0.28 1Lot(s) | -25.00% Holding |
TOPOrders are still the real check on Oct 28. A 3.58% bounce with 0.58 volume ratio does not look convincing yet.
2.57K
·
10-21
$INTC 20261023 96.0 CALL$ Still feeling strong downwards pressure and doubt in the market especially the chip sector. Selling a 3DTE. Will take assignment or continue to lower average cost from incoming premiums. Take profit => 80%
TOP96 strike feels a bit rich for 3DTE lol, that 80% take profit is the cleaner part here
4.47K
·
10-21
$BABA 20261106 118.0 CALL$ selling call option to earn full premium and leveraging my share
BABA CALL
10-21 02:00
US20261106 118.0
| Side | Price | Filled | Realized P&L |
|---|---|---|
| Sell Open | 1.02 1Lot(s) | +94.12% Holding |
TOP118 strike for 1.02 feels decent, but I care more about whether you’re capping upside too early if BABA squeezes through 120
4.81K
·
10-21
$IBM 20261218 185.0 PUT$ $IBM 20261218 185.0 PUT$ IBM: take profit. Sold this when IBM was at $220 and it's now moved up to $241 in about 2 weeks. As such, the profit target of 70% max premium had been achieved with 59 DTE remaining. There is less reason to hold on to the trade when little remaining premium and with still almost 2 months to wait so closing the trade is the right action to take. Earnings on 21st Oct so this action also remove binary conclusion that will lower the risk to reward of the trade.
TOP59 DTE with 70% of max already done, I’d close it too. Theta really stops paying enough once you’re still that far from expiry.
5.44K
·
10-21
💰🐯 SpaceX's AI Business Overtakes Starlink: What's Next for Tesla and Musk's Growing Empire?
$SpaceX(SPCX)$ 's Q3 results reveal a major shift toward AI computing, while Starlink continues generating substantial profits. With $Tesla Motors(TSLA)$ reporting tonight and merger discussions underway, what could drive the next market move? Hey Tigers! 🐯 $SpaceX(SPCX)$ delivered a strong Q3 earnings report on October 20, with revenue surging 161% year-over-year to $14.58 billion and GAAP net income reaching $4.4 billion, reversing last year's loss. But the biggest development wasn't simply the earnings beat. For the first time, SpaceX's Super Intelligence (SI) business overtook Starlink as its largest revenue contributor, signaling a shift from traditional a
TOPa. SpaceX's AI computing expansion. SpaceX's biggest transformation is not rockets reaching orbit, but AI computing becoming its growth engine. SI generated $7.56 billion in Q3 revenue, while Starlink contributed $2.37 billion in operating income to help fund expansion. However, SpaceX spent $19.59 billion on capital expenditure, exceeding quarterly revenue of $14.58 billion. AI demand may be booming, but returns must justify the investment.Execution will ultimately separate winners from hype. Tesla's earnings and a potential merger could trigger volatility, yet neither guarantees stronger shareholder returns. La merger could create synergies but complicate capital allocation and valuation. My view: watch cash flow, not just growth.The winner will be the business that converts AI ambition into sustainable profits. Hype lifts valuations; financial discipline sustains them. @AI_FocusedTrader [得意]
12.91K
·
10-21
The ETF I Would DCA for Years: QQQ, With One Important Rule
If I had to choose one ETF to DCA consistently, my answer would be QQQ. Not because it is the safest ETF. Not because it will outperform every year. And definitely not because I expect technology stocks to go up in a straight line. I choose it because I want my long-term money exposed to companies benefiting from some of the biggest structural trends of the next decade: AI, cloud computing, semiconductors, automation, digital advertising and software. And DCA solves one of my biggest problems as an investor: I do not need to predict every bottom correctly. 🔵 WHY QQQ OVER VOO OR SPY? VOO and SPY are excellent core ETFs. If someone prioritises diversification and smoother compounding, I would happily recommend starting there. But personally, I want more growth exposure. QQQ gives me heavier
TOPQQQ, but only if the process is automated. The hard part is not entry, it is not touching it when fear hits lol
797
·
10-21
🚨 DBS ($D05.SI) Intraday Technical Alert: Rebound Phase or Temporary Pause After Heavy Sell-Off? 📉📈
✨✨✨ After taking a heavy hit earlier this month—dropping sharply from October highs near $78.56 down to a low of $72.50—Singapore banking giant DBS ($D05.SI) is displaying early signs of stabilization. As of this afternoon (21 Oct 2026, 14:18 SGT), DBS is trading up +0.55% (+0.410) at $74.84, recovering nicely from its intraday low of $74.35 on moderate turnover of ~2.50M shares. Is this the beginning of a meaningful technical reversal, or merely a brief consolidation before the next move? Let’s break down what the intraday technical indicators are telling us. 📊 The Technical Setup: Key Indicators at a Glance Moving Averages (MA): MA5 ($74.32): Prices are currently trading above the short-term 5-day moving average, signaling mild short-term bullish momentum. MA12 ($74.80) & MA26 ($76.2